• Tag Archives computer arcana
  • Digital Archaeology: Codex (Floppy Disk) #8 (part 2)

    Continuing the exploration of the contents of this floppy disk (see the first part here). This disk is from a batch I picked up at a thrift store a number of years ago. As I have been digging through these disks, it has become obvious that at least some of them were once owned by someone named Connie A. Buys who used to run the “Close Encounters” Special Interest Group (SIG) on Delphi in the mid 1980s.

    My understanding is that a SIG, as it relates to Delphi, consisted of forums, live chat and files to download centered around a particular topic or theme. In this case, “Close Encounters” was about relationships and sex, particularly as it related to the online world of the day. Everything was text based from whatever terminal program you used to dial in to Delphi’s servers. Many of these disks have forum messages, e-mails and chat session logs. All of this is pre-internet stuff and I don’t know if there are any archives in existence today of what was on Delphi in the 1980s. In any case, much of this stuff would have been private at the time and some of it is quite personal.

    I’m splitting up the contents of this disk (descriptively labeled “File Disk”) since it contains a number of documents, some of which are pretty long. The second document I’m posting (DM1001B.DOC) is a series of e-mails, some of which are, um, love letters and some of which are administrative in nature about running the SIG. All are from October 1st, 1985.


    DM1001B.DOC

    #58 1-OCT-1985 00:08:51
    From: BOS1A::RODM
    To: CABUYS,RODM
    Subj: curious!

    My Beloved Darling Connie,

    I am simply dying of curiousity about something and I hope you don’t
    mind my asking and more importantly I hope you don’t mind answering.

    I was on-line and typing to John Sunday night and he asked if we were
    still together and my reply was “no! All gone! [sigh]” and
    IMMEDIATELY he typed back “brb sending mail” and I would have put
    money on it that he that very instant sent mail to YOU!!

    He would disappoint me I THINK if he didn’t – SO what I am asking is
    did you get mail from John that was originated at approx. 11 PM
    Sunday!!!

    I am NOT asking WHAT it was but just from his behavior I have to
    believe that he was sending it to you!! PLEASE! answer my curiousity!

    NOSEY AREN’T I !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Love,

    Rod

    P. S. The entire system [DELPHI] crashed before I could finish
    talking to him!

    #59 1-OCT-1985 01:23:46
    From: BOS1A::RODM
    To: CABUYS,RODM
    Subj: !

    My Dearest Delicous Darling Connie,

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    Love,

    Rod

    #60 1-OCT-1985 01:33:03
    From: BOS1A::RODM
    To: CABUYS,RODM
    Subj: !!

    RODM>> its past your bedtime – so LET’S go to bed!!!

    My Dearest Delicous Darling Connie,

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU

    Love,

    Rod

    #61 1-OCT-1985 01:35:17
    From: BOS1A::RODM
    To: CABUYS,RODM
    Subj: real

    My Beloved Darling,

    I wish I could find some way of telling you just how very much I love
    you!

    Talk to you soon!

    Love,

    Rod

    #3 1-OCT-1985 19:01:20
    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: RODM,CABUYS
    Subj: flags in Close Encounters sig

    Sweetheart,

    I’m going to set up some flags on your account in Insiders as
    follows:

    “A” flag – allows you to edit and delete Forum messages and display
    complete entry log

    “E” flag – allows you to edit announcements and experiment with
    Forms.

    “D” flag – allows you to access the database maintenance features.

    “V” flag – vendor flag in Shopping.

    I will also be forwarding to you some messages from Insiders Sig
    regarding the Forms program.

    Experiement as you wish with these flags – however please do keep me
    informed via dmail of any changes you do make. And by all means
    *don’t* let this new toy run your bill up and out of sight!

    I’ll notify John that I’ve set up these flags for you but would
    prefer that you not make it public knowledge to others for now.

    I love you very, very much!

    -Connie

    #4 1-OCT-1985 19:03:06
    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj: flags

    I’ve set flags A,E,D, and V for Rodm.

    I’m not sure yet but I may be setting A & D for Joey if he’s
    agreeable. Will let you know when I do.

    I love you!

    -Connie

    #9 1-OCT-1985 21:07:58
    From: BOS1A::JOHNMYSELF
    To: BOS1A::CABUYS,JOHNMYSELF
    Subj: RE: flags

    I remember a e and d but what is v?

    #10 1-OCT-1985 22:48:48
    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: BOS1A::JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj: RE: flags

    V has to do with Vendors for the shopping area, dear.

    Tho I’m not sure *exactly* what it has to do! [sigh]


  • Digital Archaeology: Codex (Floppy Disk) #8 (part 1)

    If I’m counting right, this is the eighth 5.25″ disk I have documented the contents of so far (see the last one here). All of them so far are from a batch I picked up at a thrift store a number of years ago. As I have been digging through these disks, it has become obvious that at least some of them were once owned by someone named Connie A. Buys who used to run the “Close Encounters” Special Interest Group (SIG) on Delphi in the mid 1980s.

    My understanding is that a SIG, as it relates to Delphi, consisted of forums, live chat and files to download centered around a particular topic or theme. In this case, “Close Encounters” was about relationships and sex, particularly as it related to the online world of the day. Everything was text based from whatever terminal program you used to dial in to Delphi’s servers. Many of these disks have forum messages, e-mails and chat session logs. All of this is pre-internet stuff and I don’t know if there are any archives in existence today of what was on Delphi in the 1980s. In any case, much of this stuff would have been private at the time and some of it is quite personal.

    This contents of this disk (descriptively labeled “File Disk”) will be split up into multiple posts since it contains a number of documents, some of which are pretty long. This first document (ARNE.DOC) is a series of e-mails questioning whether or not one of the participants in the SIG is of the appropriate age (i.e. 18+). Like most of the other documents, this one appears to be a raw terminal log so e-mails appear in the order read which isn’t always necessarily chronological and it includes commands and other editing artifacts.


    ARNIE.DOC

    #11 14-OCT-1985 19:47:26 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: ARNE,@MGRS.DIS,CABUYS
    Subj: Close Encounters SIG & Age Restriction

    Hello Arne,

    It has come to my attention that there is some question about how old you are.

    One of the membership requirements we have in Close Encounters sig is that
    one must be 18 years old or older.

    This information has been included in many areas of the sig, including the
    non-member message and new-member messages available to you when you first
    accessed this sig. It is a formal part of my contract with Delphi that I
    must enforce to the best of my ability.

    This information is also available to you in the Announcements> Membership
    section of the sig for review at any time and other such notices calling
    *all* sig members attention to this have been posted to be read automatically
    upon entry to the sig.

    Just in case you missed it, tho, I would like to quote as follows:

    “Membership in ‘Close Encounters’ is restricted to persons who are at least
    18 years of age or older…Although it’s difficult to verify age via this
    medium, anyone found to have violated the age requirement will be denied
    access to the sig at the discretion of the sig managers.”

    Other sig members have indicated that you are 17. If this is the case, then
    I will have to remove you from the membership. If this is not the case, and
    you can verify it by honestly telling me your age, then you can remain. If
    you feel insulted that we are going to such great pains about this, then
    perhaps Close Encounters is not really the sig for you.

    Please reply to this message by Wednesday, October 16, before 11 PM EST or I
    will have no choice but to take the necessary action.

    Thank you.

    -Connie A. Buys, Sig Manager
    -John Yerger, Asst. Manager
    -Joey, SysOp

    MAIL>

    #12 14-OCT-1985 20:38:01 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::ARNE
    To: CABUYS
    Subj: arne

    Dear Ms. Ca Bus ys,
    It has come to my attention that there is some question about my age.
    For the record, I am 28. S Naturally, th since this information is not being
    imparted to you by one of your cronies from years gone by, I don’t expect
    you to belive it.
    eve it.
    Arne

    MAIL> read 18

    #18 15-OCT-1985 08:22:50 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::ARNE
    To: CABUYS
    Subj: beinf g ornery

    Well, connie, looks like i’m in the process of being canned for rom the sig…
    guess you’re just doin’ your job….would “We’ll always have Parie s s” be
    laying in t on a bit too thick?
    arne

    MAIL> read 19

    #19 15-OCT-1985 10:17:45 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::JOHNWG
    To: JOEY,JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj: Could you please give me an explanation of this? Thanks, John

    From: BOS1A::SERVICE 14-OCT-1985 13:28
    To: JOHNWG
    Subj: I think ARNE didn’t like being excluded from Close Encounters..

    From: BOS1A::ARNE 13-OCT-1985 00:04
    To: SERVICE
    Subj: Close Enc SIG

    Dear Service,
    When I started using Delphi heavily about a month ago, several people
    warned me in no uncertain terms about how cliquish the place was. I thought
    they had an axe to grind for some other telecom service, so I just let it
    pass.
    Tonight the SIG managers of Close Encounters proved to me the hard way
    that I was mistaken.
    After joining the scheduled conf, the sysops started asking about my age
    which never seemed to be a prob with any lem any other time in that SIG. When I
    started joking about remembering World War I, they mde ade some rather Gestapo-
    like comments about owing them straight answers, then promptly barred me
    from the conference.
    I had offered to call the SIG mgr and convince him voice-to-voice of
    my age but the option of siml ply excluding someone who wasn’t a SIG mgr
    himself (or one of ther= ir older cronies) was apparently so much easier.
    Later I learned that the mgr’s traded quips about how strange I was
    and not fit material for their SIG anyway.
    When the heavi y usage I (and heavy bills) of September and October fall
    back to the little-or-no-usage of the pro evious months, this first-hand
    demonstration of cliquishness and cronie y-in sm in the Close Encounters group
    is the reason why.

    Very truly yours,
    Arne

    P.S. I/ ‘m not yet quick enough to know how to send copies of this to
    other users, so i but if you wig sh to send copies to JOEY, JOHNMYSELF, and
    CABUT YS, I would appreciate it.

    MAIL> read 1

    #1 15-OCT-1985 18:28:37 NEWMAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: ARNE,JOHNMYSELF,JOEY,CABUYS
    Subj: age question

    Arne,

    I honestly have no reason to *not* believe you about your age. I was simply
    trying to clear up a misunderstanding before it got out of hand, but it appears
    I was too late to do that.

    I see no reason, now that you have answered my question, to bar you from the
    sig and conferences. I do regret and apologize for any inconvenience this may
    have caused you, and very much regret that such circumstances have caused you
    to have a bad opinion of us. Please do understand that I was doing what I
    felt was necessary as Sig Manager in accordance with the terms of my contract
    with Delphi.

    If you wish to discuss this any further, please do call me collect at
    (904)-388-2531. I do wish I had been on line at the origination of all this
    problem because I would have accepted your offer at the time about making the
    call.

    -Connie A. Buys, Sig Manager

    MAIL>

    #1 15-OCT-1985 18:33:06 NEWMAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: @MGRS,CABUYS
    Subj: The Question of Age

    It’s true that we are having kids show up in the sig. And it’s true that we
    are having adults show up who are offended when asked their age.

    From this date on, I will personally handle any question about age. Until I
    can handle it, if I’m unavailable at the time of its occurrence, then the
    member is to be treated as any other member of the sig.

    Remember the users are paying our way here. We must not be harsh, or appear
    offensive or unkind to them and they require handling with kid gloves. This
    sig is young yet but has a good potential if we cultivate it carefully

    Thank you both co-operation and understanding it this.

    -Connie

    MAIL> list arne.doc

    #11 14-OCT-1985 19:47:26 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: ARNE,@MGRS.DIS,CABUYS
    Subj: Close Encounters SIG & Age Restriction

    Hello Arne,

    It has come to my attention that there is some question about how old you are.

    One of the membership requirements we have in Close Encounters sig is that
    one must be 18 years old or older.

    This information has been included in many areas of the sig, including the
    non-member message and new-member messages available to you when you first
    accessed this sig. It is a formal part of my contract with Delphi that I
    must enforce to the best of my ability.

    This information is also available to you in the Announcements> Membership
    section of the sig for review at any time and other such notices calling
    *all* sig members attention to this have been posted to be read automatically
    upon entry to the sig.

    Just in case you missed it, tho, I would like to quote as follows:

    “Membership in ‘Close Encounters’ is restricted to persons who are at least
    18 years of age or older…Although it’s difficult to verify age via this
    medium, anyone found to have violated the age requirement will be denied
    access to the sig at the discretion of the sig managers.”

    Other sig members have indicated that you are 17. If this is the case, then
    I will have to remove you from the membership. If this is not the case, and
    you can verify it by honestly telling me your age, then you can remain. If
    you feel insulted that we are going to such great pains about this, then
    perhaps Close Encounters is not really the sig for you.

    Please reply to this message by Wednesday, October 16, before 11 PM EST or I
    will have no choice but to take the necessary action.

    Thank you.

    -Connie A. Buys, Sig Manager
    -John Yerger, Asst. Manager
    -Joey, SysOp

    MAIL>

    #12 14-OCT-1985 20:38:01 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::ARNE
    To: CABUYS
    Subj: arne

    Dear Ms. Ca Bus ys,
    It has come to my attention that there is some question about my age.
    For the record, I am 28. S Naturally, th since this information is not being
    imparted to you by one of your cronies from years gone by, I don’t expect
    you to belive it.
    eve it.
    Arne

    MAIL> read 18

    #18 15-OCT-1985 08:22:50 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::ARNE
    To: CABUYS
    Subj: beinf g ornery

    Well, connie, looks like i’m in the process of being canned for rom the sig…
    guess you’re just doin’ your job….would “We’ll always have Parie s s” be
    laying in t on a bit too thick?
    arne

    MAIL> read 19

    #19 15-OCT-1985 10:17:45 MAIL

    From: BOS1A::JOHNWG
    To: JOEY,JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj: Could you please give me an explanation of this? Thanks, John

    From: BOS1A::SERVICE 14-OCT-1985 13:28
    To: JOHNWG
    Subj: I think ARNE didn’t like being excluded from Close Encounters..

    From: BOS1A::ARNE 13-OCT-1985 00:04
    To: SERVICE
    Subj: Close Enc SIG

    Dear Service,
    When I started using Delphi heavily about a month ago, several people
    warned me in no uncertain terms about how cliquish the place was. I thought
    they had an axe to grind for some other telecom service, so I just let it
    pass.
    Tonight the SIG managers of Close Encounters proved to me the hard way
    that I was mistaken.
    After joining the scheduled conf, the sysops started asking about my age
    which never seemed to be a prob with any lem any other time in that SIG. When I
    started joking about remembering World War I, they mde ade some rather Gestapo-
    like comments about owing them straight answers, then promptly barred me
    from the conference.
    I had offered to call the SIG mgr and convince him voice-to-voice of
    my age but the option of siml ply excluding someone who wasn’t a SIG mgr
    himself (or one of ther= ir older cronies) was apparently so much easier.
    Later I learned that the mgr’s traded quips about how strange I was
    and not fit material for their SIG anyway.
    When the heavi y usage I (and heavy bills) of September and October fall
    back to the little-or-no-usage of the pro evious months, this first-hand
    demonstration of cliquishness and cronie y-in sm in the Close Encounters group
    is the reason why.

    Very truly yours,
    Arne

    P.S. I/ ‘m not yet quick enough to know how to send copies of this to
    other users, so i but if you wig sh to send copies to JOEY, JOHNMYSELF, and
    CABUT YS, I would appreciate it.

    MAIL> read 1

    #1 15-OCT-1985 18:28:37 NEWMAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: ARNE,JOHNMYSELF,JOEY,CABUYS
    Subj: age question

    Arne,

    I honestly have no reason to *not* believe you about your age. I was simply
    trying to clear up a misunderstanding before it got out of hand, but it appears
    I was too late to do that.

    I see no reason, now that you have answered my question, to bar you from the
    sig and conferences. I do regret and apologize for any inconvenience this may
    have caused you, and very much regret that such circumstances have caused you
    to have a bad opinion of us. Please do understand that I was doing what I
    felt was necessary as Sig Manager in accordance with the terms of my contract
    with Delphi.

    If you wish to discuss this any further, please do call me collect at
    (904)-388-2531. I do wish I had been on line at the origination of all this
    problem because I would have accepted your offer at the time about making the
    call.

    -Connie A. Buys, Sig Manager

    MAIL>

    #1 15-OCT-1985 18:33:06 NEWMAIL

    From: BOS1A::CABUYS “CONNIE”
    To: @MGRS,CABUYS
    Subj: The Question of Age

    It’s true that we are having kids show up in the sig. And it’s true that we
    are having adults show up who are offended when asked their age.

    From this date on, I will personally handle any question about age. Until I
    can handle it, if I’m unavailable at the time of its occurrence, then the
    member is to be treated as any other member of the sig.

    Remember the users are paying our way here. We must not be harsh, or appear
    offensive or unkind to them and they require handling with kid gloves. This
    sig is young yet but has a good potential if we cultivate it carefully

    Thank you both co-operation and understanding it this.

    -Connie

    MAIL>
    Dear Mr. Gibney;

    During the early portion of our scheduled conference this past
    saturday, Arne joined us. It had been brought to our attention that
    he might not be over 18, a provision of membership as set forth in our
    rules and the contract we hold with Delphi, and I thought to enquire.
    He became evasive and refused to state his age directly. Tiglon, one
    of our members was the only person who stated that he was ‘old enough
    to vote’ but by this time he had already impressed me and several
    others that perhaps he should not be at our conference. I then set up
    a closed version of the conference until he left.

    I have included in this letter, a partial transcript of that
    conference covering Arne’s arrival to my setting up the new conference.
    I have deleted only the control characters (^M, ^H, ^G) and the extra
    lines of input. (I run with echo set so my lines appear twice – the
    duplicate lines are deleted). Sen messages have been kept in as well.

    As you know, we do have a specified age limit of 18 and while we
    recognize that we really connot verify that, it is our policy to
    check if there are conflicting reports of an individuals age.
    Otherwise, we question no one about their age preferring to
    rely on their own honesty.

    Also, a stipulation in the contract states that it is up to the
    sig managers to enforce this age restriction. Had Arne been direct
    I would have accepted that and let it be. However, he chose to remain
    ‘mysterious’, making ‘smart’ remarks about world wars, being way too
    young to run for president and the like. While he did offer to talk on
    the phone, he wanted a number to call ‘collect’. Had he considered
    having me call him, I might have done so, however, I refuse to give
    out my non-published number for ‘collect’ calls. Also, in his case,
    I probably would not give him my number under any conditions.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    partial transcript of conference 10-12-85
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    ** ARNE just joined CLE – CENTERFOLD (4 members now) **
    JOEY> Hi Arne
    .Marti> Hi Arne!!
    ARNE> hi, hi, hi
    .Myself> lo, lo, lo
    .Marti> Arne can be the centerfold…
    .Marti> boy…I’m gonna like this magazine
    .Myself> think he’s too young 4 tht.
    ARNE> smile when you say that!
    .Marti> how young?
    ARNE> how young am i?
    /w arne
    There is no information on file for ARNE.
    .Myself> right
    .Marti> yes, arene
    ARNE> who cares?
    .Marti> arne
    .Myself> I do
    JOEY> I do
    .Myself> and I am in charge here.
    ARNE> then i’m just your age or slightly older!
    ARNE> and a shameless liar
    .Myself> right , now if u pls – correct age
    JOEY> (gasp) No profile on Arne.
    ARNE> er, um, heh, heh, heh
    .Myself> I know that already
    JOEY>> I think he is a kid, also.
    /s joey I understand he does
    ILLUSION>> any idea how old he is?
    /s joey I understand he does not meet the age limit
    /s illusion too young – forget the actual number
    ARNE> w’all ah dew ‘member th’ Great War — fought in that one, by golly!
    .Marti> Arne likes to be mysterious
    JOEY>> Might want to check Clydeturbo too if he shows up.
    ARNE> war to end ’em all, we liked to call it
    .Marti> cute Arne
    JOEY> Straight answers sure are nice.
    .Myself> arne, I am afraid that you will not be allowed to remain. and I can
    keep u out easily
    ARNE> why????????
    .Marti> what is the age limit?
    .Marti> 18?
    .Myself> because we have an age limit restriction which I understand u do not
    meet –
    .Myself> and its in my contract to enforce same.
    ARNE> i’m well over 18, as aren’t we all
    .Myself> I have heard several reliable sources indicate otherwise.
    .Marti> [gulp]
    ARNE> if i were running for president i would be considered far too young
    .Myself> yes marti
    ARNE> that give you enuff clues
    JOEY> We don’t need clues.
    ARNE> what, then do you need, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
    .Marti> Are you under 18 Arne?
    .Myself> your correct – no lie – age
    ARNE> no, but if you’ll make enough suggestions that i am…
    .Myself> [and a letter from the Pope if u want to get smart abt it]
    ARNE> …we might get along REAL well
    /w
    GROUP LIST: 21:23:49
    1) CLE – CENTERFOLD
    Myself, JOEY, Marti, ARNE
    – idle
    AVAILABLE LIST: () = in conf
    (ARNE), (JOHNMYSELF), (JOEY), (ILLUSION)
    —— [4 in this area]
    ARNE> so what’s going on — we sit around and cross-examine each other?
    .Myself> not really –
    JOEY> No, we talk straight.
    ARNE> seig heil!
    .Myself> we are going to have a discussion aft 9:30
    .Myself> if anyone [else] shows up
    .Marti> is connie cming?
    .Myself> behave yourself and I might be induced to forget your not over 18
    JOEY> Connie will be here.
    .Myself> I hope so
    ARNE> yeah, yeah, yeah a sexy talk about naughty mags — whats the big deal
    JOEY> Rod won’t be, though.
    .Myself> no deal – big or otherwise.
    /w
    ARNE> then why the cross-examination

    GROUP LIST: 21:25:39
    1) CLE – CENTERFOLD
    Myself, JOEY, Marti, ARNE
    – idle
    AVAILABLE LIST: () = in conf
    (ARNE), (JOHNMYSELF), (JOEY), (ILLUSION)
    —— [4 in this area]
    JOEY> Personally, I’m not ashamed of my age.
    .Myself> mainly becasue of u sir
    .Marti> Arne…we just want to make sure you’re not a kid..
    ARNE> personally your age is your business
    .Myself> in this case, your age is my business.
    .Marti> This is a somehwat special Sig.
    .Myself> I have a sig to run, and the age limit is built into it for a variety o
    f reasons
    ARNE> ok, give me a phone number i can call collect…
    .Myself> I made sure that with my partner, we would have that in to avoid
    .Myself> potential trouble
    ARNE> i’ll talk to you and convince you i’m old enuff to vote
    JOEY>> This guy’s a smart ass!
    .Myself> sorry, my phone bills are too high for collect calls
    /s joey I will switch to a private group – stby
    ARNE> then it cant be that important
    ** Tiggy just joined CLE – CENTERFOLD (5 members now) **
    /t cle – sex mags & why read them
    .Tiggy> right on time!
    .Marti> Hi Tig!!!!
    .Tiggy> marti!! hi!
    JOEY> Hi Tig!
    ARNE> hey, tiggy, tells these cretins i’m old enuff to vote
    .Tiggy> john and joey hi!
    .Tiggy> he is old enough guys
    .Marti> cretins?
    ** <=== incognito 2) .Myself> ** PRIVATE group **

    **********end of transcript**********

    It is just possible that this matter could have been handled
    a bit better and we would be willing to meet with Arne to discuss
    this sig, and our rules and why we have them. However, I if he cannot
    conduct himself consistant with the age he expects us to accept him as,
    it is in the best interest of our membership not to allow him in.

    Please note that our action involved only the conference itself. No
    action has [yet] been taken to restrict access to the sig forum or
    data bases as we are giving the benefit of the doubt as to his correct
    age.

    Respectfully; JOohn ohn P. Yerger.
    Close Encounters Sig.

    WS> dir##


  • Digital Archaeology: Codex (Floppy Disk) #6

    This 5.25-inch magnetic scroll contains some very ancient e-mails of sorts. The disk is labeled “Conferences 8/3/85” (I think…with the handwriting it is kind of hard to tell…it could be “Confessions” but I think “Conferences” makes more sense in context). This appears to be a conversation about reorganizing some conferences/special interest groups. It’s hard to tell from the context exactly what is going on but it looks like these two people (John and Connie) were moderators (perhaps on a Compuserve special interest group?). These conferences are being downloaded, edited and being put back somewhere. Where are they being moved, what is ‘infams.co’ and who are John, Connie…and Peg? Perhaps we’ll never know…


    From COTEXTS.DOC


    Dear John,

    This is a list of conferences from the old sig newsletter. Some of
    them, I am sure, contain some very good information that the database
    could use.

    You suggested that I not download all these conferences because you
    most likely had them on disk.

    I’d suggest that we use some of these conferences, but only after
    doing some heavy editing to remove all the extraneous garbage.

    Contents:
    1 - Open House
    2 - Virginity
    3 - Rejection
    4 - Fantasies
    5 - Sex Talk
    6 - Christmas Eve Party part 1
    7 - Christmas Eve Party part 2
    8 - Sexuality and Ourselves
    9 - Telesex part 1
    10 - Telesex part 2
    11 - Sex Among Friends
    12 - Adultery

    Anyway, let me know what you think. If you want to send some of the
    conferences to me as they now are for the heavy editing I’m talking
    about, you can drop them into Preview area and I’ll pick ’em up as
    soon as possible.

    Love you,

    Connie

    P.S. I would particularly like the conference posted in which Rx came
    in and started his little game that really got things doing. That
    particular conference, tho I was sending to you like crazy about not
    knowing what to say, at least makes me appear more friendly than I
    normally do on line.

    Thanks, lover! [hugs] and [kisses]


    From EXCOTRNS.DOC


    From: JOHNMYSELF 14-AUG-1985 21:18
    To: CABUYS
    Subj: conference transcripts

    Have edited and loaded to preview the following:
    Open House
    Virginity
    Rejection
    Fantasies

    have located and peg and I will edit:
    Sex Talk
    Christmas Eve Party
    Sexuality and Ourself ves
    Telesex
    Adultery

    missing: Sex Among Friends. Seem to have misplaced all copies of
    this one.

    will have Peg helping me with the loading and editing of these files
    in the which case, check to see if it is her on my account which it
    could be.

    note: under no circumstances is ‘infams.co’ to be re-loaded to the
    new sig. per request of Peg herself.

    For those things in preview areas , check them out and decide where
    to put them. I posted them as going to ‘general’ for lack of a better
    place.

    Please advise what you do (and want done) with the rest).

                 Thanks Lover.           <warm hugs & ...>
                                 John