• Tag Archives debt
  • US now spending 26% of available tax revenue just to pay interest

    By the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire had become a has-been power whose glory days as the world’s superpower were well behind them.

    They had been supplanted the French, the British, and the Russian empires in all matters of economic, military, and diplomatic strength. Much of this was due to the Ottoman Empire’s massive debt burden.

    In 1868, the Ottoman government spent 17% of its entire tax revenue just to pay interest on the debt.

    And they were well past the point of no return where they had to borrow money just to pay interest on the money they had already borrowed.

    The increased debt meant the interest payments also increased. And three years later in 1871, the government was spending 32% of its tax revenue just to pay interest.

    By 1877, the Ottoman government was spending 52% of its tax revenue just to pay interest. And at that point they were finished. They defaulted that year.

    This is a common story throughout history.

    The French government saw a meteoric rise in their debt throughout the late 1700s. By 1788, on the eve of the French Revolution, they spent 62% of their tax revenue to pay interest on the debt.

    Charles I of Spain had so much debt that by 1559, interest payments exceeded ordinary revenue of the Habsburg monarchy. Spain defaulted four times on its debt before the end of the century.

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that an unsustainable debt burden soundly tolls the death knell of a nation’s economy, and its government.

    Unfortunately, it can sometimes take a rocket scientist to figure out what the real numbers are; governments have a vested interest in not being transparent about their debts and interest payments.

    In the Land of the Free, for example, the government routinely doesn’t count interest payments that they make to the Social Security Trust Fund.

    They’ve managed to convince people that those debts don’t matter ‘because we owe it to ourselves.’

    Apparently in their minds, solemn promises made to retirees simply don’t count.

    It’s like a person who is in debt up to his eyeballs with both credit card companies and family members has no compunction about stiffing Grandpa.

    Obligations are obligations, no matter who they’re owed to.

    Taking this into account, total US interest payments in Fiscal Year 2013 were a whopping $415 billion, roughly 17% of total tax revenue. Just like the Ottoman Empire was at in 1868.

    Here’s the thing, though– it’s inappropriate to look at total tax revenue when we’re talking about making interest payments.

    The IRS collected $2.49 trillion in taxes last year (net of refunds). But of this amount, $891 billion was from payroll tax.

    According to FICA and the Social Security Act of 1935, however, this amount is tied directly to funding Social Security and Medicare. It is not to be used for interest payments.

    Based on this data, the amount of tax revenue that the US government had available to pay for its operations was $1.599 trillion in FY2013.

    This means they actually spent approximately 26% of their available tax revenue just to pay interest last year.

    Full article: http://www.sovereign … -pay-interest-14024/


  • Obama budget raises spending, taxes

    Saying he’s optimistic the economy and the government’s fiscal picture have finally turned the corner five years into his tenure, President Obama announced a $3.9 trillion 2015 budget Tuesday that calls for tax hikes and a $60 billion boost in spending next year.

    The federal government would run a $564 billion deficit in 2015, which would be a record low for Mr. Obama’s tenure. But the deficit would remain at about half a trillion dollars a year for the next 10 years, meaning debt would continue to pile up. By 2024, Mr. Obama projects gross debt would be $27.5 trillion.

    He also rejected spending cuts he and Congress have agreed to in recent years, saying the government is wounding basic domestic programs. He instead said higher domestic spending can be accommodated by raising taxes on the wealthy.

    “At a time when our deficits are falling at the fastest rate in 60 years, we’ve got to decide if we’re going to keep squeezing the middle class,” Mr. Obama said.

    A $302 billion transportation-building program would be paid for by eliminating tax breaks for businesses — a move that is unlikely to sit well with Republicans, who have said any corporate tax code changes will have to be revenue neutral.

    Mr. Obama also proposed a federal tobacco tax hike to pay for federal funding to guarantee preschool and full-day kindergarten for children from low- and middle-income families.

    The budget is a month later than the deadline set in law.

    And it arrives in a Congress unlikely to care very much about the details. Senate Democrats have already said they won’t try to pass a budget this year, while House Republicans will try — but will reject most of the president’s proposals.

    Full article: http://www.washingto … ises-spending-taxes/


  • Supposedly Fiscally Conservative Republicans Make Exceptions For Defense Spending

    Some supposedly fiscally conservative Republicans are upset that the Obama administration has proposed that Department of Defense spending for fiscal year 2015 be limited to roughly $496 billion.

    Chairman of the House Budget Committee Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.), said that the Obama administration’s plans to cut the defense budget were “disappointing,” and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that the proposed defense budget would put the U.S. military’s ability to protect American interests abroad, provide a deterrent to attack, and provide security for allies at risk.

    Former Congressman Allen West (R-Fla.) issued a bizarre statement in response to the proposed budget, saying that it is being cheered by our enemies and that small cuts to our vast defense budget will “decimate our military capability.”

    You would think that those who like to talk about fiscal responsibility would be more open to cutting defense spending, especially given that U.S. defense spending dwarfs any other country’s.

    According to the International Business Times, in 2013 the top 20 military spenders spent $1.316 trillion on “defense-related expenditures.” The U.S. was responsible for an astonishing 44 percent of that spending.

    via Supposedly Fiscally Conservative Republicans Make Exceptions For Defense Spending