Digital Archaeology: Codex (Floppy Disk) #10 (part 2)


A summary for those that haven’t been keeping up with this series:

I found a number of 5.25″ disks at a thrift store a number of years ago. I finally got around to acquiring a 5.25″ disk drive and extracting the contents a while back. Since then I have been posting the contents here.

Based on the contents, at least some of these disks were apparently once owned by someone named Connie who used to run the “Close Encounters” Special Interest Group (SIG) on Delphi in the mid 1980s.

A specific definition of this SIG was found in a document on one of the disks: “This SIG, known as ‘Close Encounters’, is a forum for the discussion of relationships that develop via computer services like the Source, CompuServe, and Delphi. Our primary emphasis is on the sexual aspects of those relationships.”

This service was text based and was accessed via whatever terminal program you used on your computer to dial in to Delphi’s servers. Many of these disks have forum messages, e-mails and chat session logs. All of this is pre-internet stuff and I don’t know if there are any archives in existence today of what was on Delphi in the 1980s. In any case, much of this stuff would have been private at the time and probably wouldn’t be in such archives even if they existed.

This post includes the contents of CLEC01.DOC. The file is dated October 26th, 1985 and contains a chat log about marriage, specifically regarding the question ‘Why get married?’.

See the previous post here.

===
CLEC01.DOC
===

 
 ** New group name "CLE - WHY MARRY ?" selected **

 ** NJOHNSON just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (2 members now) **
 ** JOEY just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (3 members now) **
 ** RBS just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (4 members now) **
 ** Dick just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (5 members now) **

 Myself> ATTN:...
 Myself> is time to discuss (or discover) the reason for marriage.
 JOEY> Hi Dick.
 Myself> one thing is certain before we start...
 Myself> Lawyers were invented AFTER the fact.
 RBS> brb
 RBS> - signed off -
 NJOHNSON> Your sure about that now?
 Myself> Yes, when they saw the possibilities in marriage - they
         immediately started
 NJOHNSON> i c
 Myself> specializing in the creation and maintainance of divorce
 JOEY> and charges.
 Myself> <yes nance - I'm sure>
 Myself> but on the more serious side....
 Myself> why marry in the first place?
 Myself> <comments here>
 Myself> <write legibly>
 JOEY> !
 Myself> ga joey
 JOEY> Well, I think that after two people see each other for
       awhile....
 NJOHNSON> Well in Justins First Apology it saids Marry for the
           purpose of raising a family or abstain completely. ga
 JOEY> They seem to think getting married married is a way of claiming
       the other person. ga
 Myself> claiming the other for what purpose
 Myself> don't they have enuf trouble
 Myself> with themselves?
 JOEY> For themselves, John. Less chance of them leaving.
       Probably....
 JOEY> a self confidence problem for some people.
 Myself> no doubt
 Myself> any one here tonight who is married?
 JOEY> Not me.
 Myself> well don't all spk at once.
 Myself> I can only take so much at one time <grin>
 Myself> dick care to comment?
 Dick> on being married?
 Myself> yes
 Dick> I like it!
 Myself> why?

 ** ray just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (5 members now) **

 Myself> hi ray
 JOEY> Hi Ray.
 NJOHNSON> hi
 ray> hi all
 Dick> it keeps me off the street corners and out of the bars <grin>
 Dick> also very broke.
 ray> long time no see
 Myself> I have a computer that does that much!
 Dick> however I find it very comfortable to have a family and its
       support to  offset the responsibilities of raising childern and
       being responsive to my wife's needs.
 Myself> ok
 Dick> the computer only adds to the problems when I spend too much
       time and/or money on it <grin>
 Myself> of course, if u weren't married you would not have those
         things to be offset.
 Myself> which it almost always does right?
 Dick> true, I'd find other vices to spend time and money on.
 NJOHNSON> - signed off -
 Myself> right
 Dick> right!
 JOEY> brb
 JOEY> - signed off -

 ** JOEY just joined CLE - WHY MARRY ? (4 members now) **

 JOEY> hmmm, couldn't find anybody.
 Myself> only 7 hrs dick?
 Dick> took a break for some "honeydo's"
 ray> - signed off -
 Myself> at least she was doing <an not don't ing>
 Dick> agreed.
 Myself> <remark contributed by Princess>
 JOEY> hehehe
 Myself> that was a quick co

 Myself> ** New group name "CLE THIS IS A CONFERENCE??" selected **

 Dick> so much for tonight.  see you in Forum.
 Myself> right
 JOEY> System is going nuts.
 Myself> so am I

 ** Marti just joined CLE THIS IS A CONFERENCE?? (3 members now) **

 JOEY> Hi Marti.
 Marti> Hi Joey
 JOEY> shhhhh, John.
 Myself> well, s abt time u got here <grin>
 Marti> Sorry....just got back from Boston
 Myself> thats true joey
 Marti> went 70 mph
 JOEY> WOW!
 Marti> well....almost
 Myself> will stick around till ten then hanging it up otherwise.
 JOEY> How was it?
 Marti> Wonderful!!!!
 JOEY> <jealous>
 Marti> Anyone else coming?
 JOEY> Not me.
 Myself> I am not even breathing hard!
 Marti> sheesh
 Myself> u askd
 Marti> you guys are no fun

 ** RODM just joined CLE THIS IS A CONFERENCE?? (4 members now) **

 Myself> hi rod
 JOEY> Hi Rod.
 Marti> Hi Rod!
 RODM> hey there
 JOEY> How you know Marti?
 Myself> u w the stars in ur eyes.
 Marti> hhmmm...guess I don't really know, do I?
 Myself> no!!
 Myself> for the record - I'm no fun
 Myself> just ask my favorite women!
 Marti> I don't believe that, John.
 Marti> women?
 JOEY> Princess, you there?
 JOEY> ahem
 Marti> he said "women"
 Myself> something wrong with your hem joey?
 JOEY> Yep, too short.

 ** EFK just joined CLE THIS IS A CONFERENCE?? (5 members now) **

 Marti> who else should we ask, John?
 JOEY> Hi Liz.
 Marti> Hi Elizabeth
 EFK> Hi All.
 RODM> Hi Liz

 ** Bob just joined CLE THIS IS A CONFERENCE?? (6 members now) **

 Myself> yeah, let it down and for god's sake cover those knees!
 Myself> hi lz
 Marti> Hi Bob
 JOEY> Hi Bob.

 Myself> ** New group name "CLE - WHY MARRY" selected **

 Bob> rehi all
 EFK> Why the Is this a conference name?
 EFK> Never you mind.
 Myself> because I thot no-one was going to show up
 EFK> Here's me.
 Myself> I am going to post a poll later thes evening on the subject
 Myself> of conference starting time.
 Myself> be sure to vote.
 EFK> Just got back from the Computer show.  Didn't make the early
      train. Sorry to be late.
 RODM> what show?!!
 JOEY> - signed off -
 Bob> - signed off -
 Myself> I heard there was a computer running around Boston in the
         Nude!
 RODM> oops there we go again!
 EFK> Madison Square Garden Selling show.
 Marti> Where Myself?
 Myself> everyone called that a computer show <grin>
 Myself> princess sends all her love.
 EFK> Tell her thanks.
 EFK> But she should save some.
 RODM> Likewise and tell her I miss her!
 Myself> says she has plenty to go around - thinks she is Juliet
 Myself> the more she gives the more she has.
 EFK> Saw a great button at the show a propos this sig...
 EFK> Nice computers don't go down.
 RODM> on line that is!!!
 Myself> right!!
 EFK> Someone should tell Delphi's VAX that!
 Myself> that's the Vax of life my friend.
 Marti> BRB..going to mail
 EFK> ok Marti.  We'll still be here.
 Myself> Liz - where's jane?
 EFK> Wanna wait for everybody to come back before we start?
 EFK> Was just gonna ask that myself.
 Myself> I'm still waiting for everyone to arrive in the first place.
 EFK> And I thought I was late.  Never again guilt
 Marti> I just got here too, Liz.....THEY were early.
 Myself> We were on time - note official co schedule time is 9:30 pm
         eastern time.
 EFK> Oh. Thought it was 9.
 Marti> Oh yeah?
 RODM> I'm ALWAYS late - the LATE Rod!
 Myself> I heard another name rod
 Myself> something applicable to warmer temps. <griggle>
 RODM> several I suspect!!!
 RODM> most of them bad!!
 EFK> What are you talking about?
 Marti> Is Connie coming tonight?
 Marti> <no comment myself>
 Myself> just running off at the mouth luv.
 RODM> I think so
 EFK> Fill my screen, Big Boy.
 RODM> she will be latre!
 RODM> late! that is
 Myself> what do u mean will be - she is <hahaha>
 Marti> Guess joey and bob are having problems.
 EFK> <he he ha>
 Myself> I didn't know they were c'ing ea other <gasp!>
 RODM> She should be arriving Jax about NOW!
 Myself> hahahahahahaha
 Myself> be at least 40 minutes b 4 she gets near to being on-line
 Marti> hhmm....it IS suspicious, Myself
 RODM> >John >2
 Myself> well shall we continue or what?
 RODM> go for it!
 Myself> ok....
 Marti> yes, Myself

 ** JOEY just joined CLE - WHY MARRY (5 members now) **

 Myself> the appointed topic is why marry, and 2 out of 3 people
         responsible for the suggested topic are now here so liz - go
         for it.
 JOEY> I miss anything?
 Marti> Hi Joey
 EFK> I ask this questin because...
 Myself> not yet joey
 Myself> <is bob ok? <griggle>>

 ** FRIDAY just joined CLE - WHY MARRY (6 members now) **

 EFK> More and more people are living together instead of going "legal
 FRIDAY> evening
 EFK> Hi Bob
 JOEY> Hi Richard. Long time no see.
 FRIDAY> yeah..good to be back!
 Marti> <Hi Richard>
 Myself> <lo rich>
 EFK> Why get legally married is a good questin for the 80's.
 RODM> rehi
 EFK> Do I have to go first?
 Myself> no
 Myself> but u may.
 FRIDAY> <grin>
 EFK> Ok.  The first time or the second?
 Myself> does it matter?  - yes it does
 EFK> yes it does.
 Myself> the first time is excusable - after that ur on ur own.
 Myself> lets start at the beginning
 EFK> I got married the first time after living together because...
 EFK> something in the back of my mind...
 EFK> (in my mother's voice) said I should be married.
 Myself> <mothers are like that>
 EFK> I was 22, and all that brainwashing is hard to overcome.
 EFK> The second time, Alex & I lived together first too, and I didn't
      want to get married.
 EFK> But he had never been married, and I think he wanted the legal 
      commitment. Since it didn't matter to me either way, no
      difference in my mind, anyway, I married him.
 Myself> and?
 EFK> I think people marry for the commitment.  But is it really
      necessary?
 Myself> good q
 EFK> And what really IS the commitment?  "fidelity" (I hate that
      word.)
 JOEY> !
 EFK> ga
 Myself> joey
 JOEY> I will say it again.. Men are not as self confident as
       women......
 JOEY> and they want the commitment because of jealousy or lack
       of.....
 JOEY> self confidence. ga
 Marti> ?
 Myself> ok, both valid points
 Myself> and no doubt some validity in both
 Myself> marti ga
 Marti> One thing we are overlooking here....
 Marti> is children...IF we decide we want them...
 Marti> aren't they entitled to have a mom and pop...
 EFK> !
 Marti> rather than mom and one of her friends? GA
 Myself> ef ga
 Myself> <then me>
 EFK> I would have kids whether I was married or not.  I'm not talking
      about a "friend."
 EFK> I'm talking about my mate whether we had the "piece of paper" or
      not, the commitment is the same.  And re: self confidence,
      you're as confident as you tell yourself you are. ga
 Myself> ok.
 Marti> !
 Myself> first - parents make a whole nother topic - but
 Myself> marriage per se doesn't make parents any more than does the
         biology of sex
 Myself> marti on ! and back to me
 Myself> ga
 Marti> ok....the "piece of paper"....
 Marti> makes it legal in the eyes of the court...
 Marti> if your mate decides he wants to split....
 Marti> even if he admits paternity....
 Marti> judges don't give as much support money to...
 Marti> "illegitimate" children....
 Marti> I think they are entitled to the legality...
 Marti> love is wonderful....and I'm not talking about being...
 Marti> good parents or bad partents...but I think children...
 Marti> should be made to feel they are "legal"...just my feeling. GA
 Myself> good points marti
 Myself> and the legal issue is very important
 Myself> indeed, but strictly speaking - parents are those who raise
         and love you
 Myself> which often has little to do with the marital status of the
         parent figures.
 Marti> <agreed>
 Myself> also, I think this current generation is far too ready to
         split and seems to be
 Myself> for ever looking for a way out if things don't go quite
         right.
 JOEY> True, John.
 Myself> sure, kids deserve parents, n I don't think a kid is any less
 Myself> legit <regardless of man made laws>
 Myself> just cause the parents weren't married.
 Myself> I think also, that the courts
 Myself> are starting to look at a lot of issues differently which is
         good.
 Myself> like the issue of custody - used to be the mother always got
         it except for rare cases - and the man never had a chance to
         do anything but pay for the rest of his life.
 Myself> ga
 Marti> ?
 Myself> <been on soap box too long>
 Myself> ga
 Marti> me?
 Myself> ur up marti
 Marti> Well...we're getting off the topic a bit..

 ** HANSOLO just joined CLE - WHY MARRY (5 members now) **

 Marti> but just want to say...
 Myself> <that happens>
 JOEY> hi
 John> (Hello folks)
 Marti> Hi John!!!!!!!!!!...
 Marti> I'm glad things have changed...
 Marti> I know many men who are better parents that wome...
 Marti> women...
 Marti> but I still think...if at all possible...
 Marti> if you plan to raise a family....you should have that...
 Marti> little piece of paper....
 EFK> Sorry Marti.  Why?
 Myself> my q too
 Marti> if kids are not involved...it's strictly between the people...
 Marti> lots. of reasons, Liz....
 Myself> exactly
 Marti> what about social security....
 John> ?
 Marti> inheritance and such...
 EFK> ?!
 Myself> what abt it?  uncle sam is going to kill the program b 4 our
         kids get to it.
 Marti> GA
 Myself> < john , efk >
 Myself> john ga
 John> Ok thnx
 Myself> <aft john - efk, me>
 John> the 'piece of paper' is to protect the offspring.
 John> more than anything else.
 John> It will also protect the right, such as they are, of the spouse
 John> in the event of a death.
 John> there is a case in court here cos a woman died and her
       'husband' wants executorship of the estate.  However she had
       filed for a divorce about six months ago.
 Marti> <what happened?>
 John> They were already separated when she died.  The husband
       allegedly owes the estate approx. 50,000 now.
 Marti> <boooooo>
 John> the case just went to hearing on thursday.
 Myself> <that will take a while>
 John> <I agree Marti>
 John> anyway to get back to why get married.
 John> Like I said earlier to provide for the children.
 John> Ga
 Myself> ef ga
 EFK> Tks.
 EFK> First of all, if it's money you're talking about...
 John> <Have u ever tried to concentrate n tis and an Agatha Christe movie?? grin>
 EFK> alimony is the price men have had to pay for keeping women
      down..
 EFK> Secondly, this is not a questin of money at least in my eyes.
 John> < I hate to say this but some let themselves be kept.>
 EFK> There's nothing wrong with being old fashioned and saying that
      the courts have to protect our poor defenseless little ones,
      but...
 EFK> you talk as though marriage keeps families together, when we see
      all around us that this is not so.
 EFK> First, staying together for the "sake of the children" is bad
      for the children.  What happens when they're grown up?
 EFK> Second, we live in an age where the phrase "blended family" has
      been coined...
 Myself> <now we are approaching my points>
 Marti> <I agree completely>
 EFK> two kids from his first wife, one from my second husband. etc. 
      How good is that for the kids?
 EFK> ga whoever.
 Myself> me
 Myself> thank you...
 Myself> and first - yes, if you are planning to raise a family in the
         strict legal sense of things, you should be 'married',
         however, having said that...
 Myself> let me also say that I lived with my second wife and was
         every bit married to her without the "paper
 EFK> That's it exactly.  Then why did you get married?
 Myself> and nothing has changed since getting it.
 Myself> Marriage (to my mind) is the committment shared between two
         people and the 'legal marriage' is merely an outward sign of
         that.
 John> ?
 Myself> <john next>
 Myself> the children will be every bit protected as long as the
         family unit chooses to provide for that.  As marti pointed
         out earlier..
 Myself> it is between themselves.  If for example two people profess
         to be married..
 Myself> who can say otherwise as long as they provide for their
         family?

 ** ESG just joined CLE - WHY MARRY (6 members now) **

 JOEY> Hi.
 Myself> whose business is it any way if they choose to be married
         without a 'legal' ceremony.?
 EFK> !
 Marti> <Hi ESG>
 Myself> as for inherritance, that with proper planning will be the
         same.
 ESG> hi marti
 Myself> and social sec will die of old age before I do.
 Myself> ef on ! then john ga
 EFK> me too, myself
 EFK> tks
 EFK> I just remembered, in addition to my mother's voice, there was
      great social pressure to get married (1974).
 EFK> It's so weird.  No one tells you directly, but the pressure is
      there. Also..
 EFK> You have no name for your lover/roommate/paramour?/mate etc.  It
      was so nice and easy to say "This is my husband."
 Myself> <social pressure - peer pressure never fazed me that much>
 EFK> As to whose business it is if anyone is married, somehow society
      still sanctions the institution.  If anything happened to Alex
      (heaven forbid), I would never marry again, kids or no kids. ga
 Myself> john ga
 John> Ok
 ESG> - signed off -

 ** Bob just joined CLE - WHY MARRY (6 members now) **

 EFK> (rehi Bob)
 John> There are at least two forms of marriage.
 Bob> rehi all... back from dumyland
 John> the 'legal' and 'religous or moral' type.
 Myself> <u look ok 4 a dummy - grin>
 John> It seems as if we are geting the two mxied.  (Which they are in
       the US.)
 Bob> (actually it was dumpyland)
 John> It also seems as if we agree that the 'legal' form is for the
       protection of the offspring and survivng dependent spouse,
       whether or not that be male or female.)
 John> ga
 Myself> ok
 Myself> good point - however - marriage is marriage-
 Myself> legal, moral or other-
 Myself> I mean consider a moment
 Myself> adam & eve.
 Myself> they were NEVER married as we understand it.
 Myself> God created them, put them in a garden and said "do it"
 Myself> that's all
 EFK> !
 Myself> they were society!
 John> <marriage is a creation of man!!>
 Myself> ef on ! ga
 EFK> Religion is not to be confused with mythology, Myself.
 John> gotta go folks need shower am going out in abt 15.
 Myself> bye john
 EFK> Night John.
 JOEY> Bye John.
 Bob> point is still valid liz
 Myself> I make no stand on the story - I simply present it as given.
 John> have a good weekend all
 Bob> nite
 John> - signed off -
 EFK> I don't, Myself.  It is not given at all!
 Myself> the point is important not the nature of the story containing
         it.
 Bob> !
 Myself> bob on !  ga
 EFK> ga I'm done.
 Bob> the point is, whether you accept the story or not..
 Bob> at some point in history, there first appeared creatures you
      would consider human...
 EFK> (there still are)
 Myself> <grin>
 Bob> they procreated without any concept of marriage as we 
      understand it
 Bob> the importance of the source (i.e. the story)
 Bob> is whether they were monogamous
 Bob> & that can't be objectively established
 EFK> If there were no other women, how could Adam fool around?
 EFK> and vice versa, of course.
 Marti> <must have been some incest there also>
 Myself> <is easy to be faithful when you have no choices huh?>
 Bob> within a generation or 2, I'm sure the opportunity was there
 EFK> Are you equating marriage and sex? Tsk tsk.
 Myself> hell no
 EFK> Bob?
 Myself> they aren't even related except that some married people do
         it.
 Bob> (I wish a co-worker of mine were here... he could argue the
      theology *very* pursuasively)
 Myself> theology per se is not this sig's topic.
 Bob> not at all, liz...
 Bob> however...
 Bob> marriage - sex = best friends
 EFK> I'm missing the point, then.
 Myself> <Goldie Hawn & Burt Reynolds - good flick>
 Bob> (best friends + sex = marriage ?)
 Myself> not necessarily bob
 EFK> Ah, now you may have something.
 JOEY> Can be a disaster.
 Myself> The point in Marriage is that two people make independent
         choices on the way things will be.  Then they decide whether
 Bob> independent or inter-dependent?
 Myself> or not to enter into the 'institution' of marriage.
 Myself> However, they can be just as married without it and its only
         their own business.
 Myself> a bit of both bob.
 Myself> the man made rules
 EFK> man-made, indeed.
 Myself> regarding marriage came much later in mans history and was
 Bob> indeed, liz!
 Myself> originally intended to serve to strengthen the family
 Myself> and social structures.
 Myself> In this so called 'modern' age it serves as little more than
 Bob> which has historically proved to be a positive feature
 Myself> a legal strangle hold on people wanting to 'cut their losses'
         when times aren't good enough for them.
 Bob> !
 Myself> ga bob
 Bob> I have to begin disagreeing, John...
 Myself> ga
 Myself> <devils advocate can be an interesting role>
 Bob> you're falling into the trap of thinking of historical times as
      somehow less advanced, more primitive
 Bob> technology has advanced, people have stayed pretty much the same
 Myself> that is true enough
 Bob> human nature (judging by history) is pretty much the same now as
      in prehistoric times
 EFK> If you believe in human nature, that is.
 EFK> Which I don't
 Bob> so, if marriage and the structures it supports had a valid
      function then, the institution porbably has a more valid
      function than a myopic look-ahead type view would seem to
      indicate
 Bob> e.g.
 Myself> yes, it no doubt does.
 Bob> during my lifetime, the institution of marriage was widely
      assailed actively during the 60's
 Bob> we're now seeing a backlash in terms of...
 Bob> unstable, stressful relationships, troubled kids,
 Myself> <next>
 Bob> pandemic diseases, etc.
 Bob> ga
 Myself> ok
 Myself> points taken....
 Myself> basically, marriage does some other things so far hinted at..
 EFK> (I can take a hint)
 Myself> and that is it provides a certain feeling of security, and
         importance to the people involved.
 Myself> admittedly, not everyone is cut to be married and they should
         follow their own course
 Bob> !
 Myself> but there are those who need that in many respects.  It says
         simply 'I belong'
 Myself> ga bob
 Bob> (finishing previous thought)
 Marti> <I agree Myself>
 Bob> the lesson was that once again people let technology (the pill)
      blind them to the other practical aspects of something it had
      taken many generations to learn & build upon
 Bob> other issue is...
 Bob> there is a more abstract value to be gained by the institution,
      though it is not very popular these days
 Bob> that is the daily experience of balancing the needs of the
      individual with the common goals and attendent submission of the
      ego to those goals
 Bob> unpopular because it's trendy in psychobabble circles to assume
      that self-involvement must come before all else
 Bob> ga
 JOEY> !
 Myself> ok.
 Myself> joey ga
 JOEY> I only have one thing to say.....
 JOEY> People usually get married because they love each other......
 JOEY> and want to spend the rest of their life with the other
       person....
 Myself> <right>
 JOEY> Whether it is legal or not doesn't matter.
 RBS>> suggested topic "what is love"
 EFK> How romantic <swoon>
 JOEY> g
 EFK> !
 JOEY> ga
 Myself> ef ga
 Myself> <good suggestion rbs>
 EFK> Love is not enough.
 Myself> <also true>
 JOEY> true
 EFK> Sex is not enough
 EFK> Kids are not enough.
 JOEY> wellllll
 EFK> If people only realized how much work "spending the rest of your
      life with someone" was, they'd think about it more...
 Myself> common interest isn't enough either.
 Myself> that is very true
 Myself> and then maybe fewer people would get divorced.
 EFK> I realize I think too much, but that's why I didn't feel the
      *need* to get married.  I would have felt married regardless of
      the ceremony...
 Bob> all are enough *IF* they are shared common goals, worked at
      equally
 JOEY> It's work, but not bad work!
 EFK> But Alex needed it, and I love him, so I did it for  him.  After
      all, I did want to spend the rest of my life with him <grin>
 Myself> sometimes it's the pits joey
 EFK> No, not the pits.
 JOEY> I know, John, I know.
 Bob> too many people get married when they're *in love* with someone,
      not when they *love* someone
 EFK> Just very VERY hard work.
 EFK> Bob, you're a genius.
 Myself> close anyway
 JOEY> They get married before the infatuation is over.
 Bob> duh, say what?!?
 EFK> Of course.  Joey is right.  They should wait until the "rush"
      goes away and then decide.
 Bob> but...
 Bob> they're bombarded by the *rush*
 EFK> (it goes away)
 Myself> that is where the decisions come in.  which you don't make
         well when your head is not in gear.
 EFK> If the rush didn't go away, we'd all starve to death.
 Bob> they see hours every day where people meet, fall in love (sic) &
      make commitments between the titles & the closing credits!
 Myself> I'll drink to that.
 EFK> <pouring>
 Bob> note:
 Myself> <thnx dear>
 Myself> <next>
 Bob> these people they see rarely have money prob's, pet peeves,
      sexual dysfunctions, b.o., morning mouth, etc.
 EFK> <grin>
 Bob> & if they do... they get divorced just as fast as they got
      involved!
 JOEY> All in half an hour, too.
 Bob> (or move on to a new partner)
 EFK> Unless they stay in love and it turns to real love.
 EFK> That's a chance we all take.
 Myself> bob - done?
 Bob> considering the propaganda we're bombarded with, it's a miracle
      there are any stable relationships left at all! (there sure
      aren't too many in the land where the stories come from)
 Bob> ga
 Myself> exactly and to make a point
 Myself> from Liz's earlier comments abt the voices saying she had to
         get married..
 Myself> look at the stories we were 'sold' in our early education...
 Myself> remember Dick and Jane?
 EFK> Vaguely
 Myself> they were the prototype of the married couple...
 EFK> sexist propaganda
 Marti> <I remember dick and Jane>
 JOEY> Me too.
 Myself> they lived in nice little white houses
 Myself> with picket fences and kind neighbors.
 Myself> cute little dogs etc.
 EFK> (See Spot run.)
 Bob> (I prefer chain link... no painting)
 EFK> (Run, run, run)
 Myself> they had nothing at all to do with the real world where
         pickets were laborers trying to get a decent wage from greedy
         bosses...
 Myself> they had no 'race' trouble - hell I don't recall thet they
         ever met a black person.
 Myself> and how did that house get paid for?  who knows, it was
         always theirs.
 Myself> <right??>
 RBS>> or greedy individuals who exepcted a living irregardless of the
       economy
 Myself> and what did they do when they grew up?
 Myself> of course, they married each other and
 Myself> perpetuated the structure.
 Myself> and then there was cinderella and that prince
 JOEY> Well, DickV was independently wealthty.
 EFK> <hehe>
 Myself> they lived 'hapilly ever after'
 EFK> !
 JOEY> And Jane loved it.
 Myself> with ravaging hordes trying to conguer their kingdom
 Myself> etc
 Bob> in my book, dick came out of the closet, while Jane was a leader
      of A.A. and M.A.D.D.after her 3rd divorce
 Myself> ga efk
 Myself> <cute bob>
 EFK> My parents are still blissfully (almost always) happy after 37
      years...
 EFK> In all fairness to my mother's pressure, I had very good role
      models for marriage right there in the house.  How could I not
      get married when they set such a good example?  ga
 Bob> !
 Myself> that is perhaps the most important reason why the idea stayed
         with you.
 Myself> lots of folks don't have the necessary role models to follow
 Myself> bob ga
 Bob> question: what were they doing right?
 Myself> <most things no doubt>
 EFK> yes.
 Bob> I think the one thread you'll find in most happy long-term
      relationships...
 Bob> is priorities
 Bob> what do each put first?
 EFK> And they fell in love at 14.  That's 43 years
 Myself> <each other if they lasted this long>
 Bob> if *both* honestly put the maintenance of the relatiopnship &
      the happiness of the other first, it'll generally work
 EFK> Absolutely.  They'd do anything for each other.  And my father
      is impossible to live with (he's a lot like me) <hehe>
 Bob> NOTE: this include ahead of careers & indiviual egos!
 JOEY> Definitive word, Bob. Both.
 Myself> <really goes without saying>
 Bob> necessary word, joey!
 Bob> I personally feel that the women's movement, which so many men
      decry, has helped a lot inthis regard
 Myself> so why get married?  because you both want to that's why.
 Bob> not that it's made things better... it hasn't
 EFK> Ta dah.  Case closed.
 Bob> but it has pointed out to men, by example, the effects & cost of
      putting other things in your life ahed of your family
 Myself> <wouldv'e made that point earlier - but would've been a short co>
 Bob> ga
 Myself> that is also true bob
 EFK> What about people who don't do what they want?
 Myself> xpln pls?
 EFK> Like I was telling Jane and Marti the other day...
 Bob> this was the position of the unsatisfied housewives before the
      liberation
 EFK> I just discovered that I generally don't consider what I *want*
      when I make a decision.
 Bob> I know I don't...
 EFK> I'm too analytical, and I don't follow my feelings.
 EFK> Care to comment?
 Bob> !
 Bob> sure
 Myself> I often don't get to do things I  think I  want
 Bob> I also always make plans around others in my family
 Myself> but is ok if everything else seems to work out.
 Bob> in all fairness, I get my way about as much as others...
 Myself> often by the time I think of it again, it really wasn't that
         important anyway.
 Bob> true john
 Myself> bob ga
 Bob> re: feelings
 Bob> returning to psychobabbly <retrieving favorite soapbox> feelings
      are over-rated
 Bob> they are great, sure
 Bob> they can be enjoyed, sure
 EFK> !
 Bob> but if you don't at least *try* to make them subservient to your
   intellect, you're destined to be a basket case, or irresponsible at
   best
 Bob> ga
 EFK> I don't think you understand what I meant.  Let me explain...
 EFK> When Alex wanted to get married,
 EFK> I weighed his feelings...
 EFK> security, money, sex, children etc.
 EFK> I never asked myself what did I *want*.
 EFK> Does that clarify it?
 Bob> !
 EFK> ga
 Myself> yes <but I didn't know u then <giggle>
 Myself> bob ga
 Bob> liz, you have to!
 EFK> I have to?
 Marti> <Gotta run...night all...hugs to everyone>
 Bob> it's part of the commitment...
 Myself> <not really>
 Bob> nite m
 EFK> Night Marti.  Come back soon!
 JOEY> Nite Marti, I am drooping, too.
 Bob> one last thought b4 I have to run, too...
 JOEY> Eyes, that is.
 Marti> <hahaha>
 Bob> on the insidiousness of psychobabble: once you do elect to
      exercize your intellect, you then are encouraged to analyze
      yourself into a Woody Allen-esque state of ineffectuality
 Bob> with that, I must be off for a bit...
 Marti> - signed off -
 Bob> <grin>
 EFK> Bye Bob.  Don't babble too much.
 Bob> I may be back... will see
 Bob> nite all
 EFK> Take care.
 JOEY> Nite bob
 Bob> bye
 Bob> adios
 Bob> au revoir
 Bob> ciao
 Bob> adieu
 Bob> auf viedersehen
 Bob> adio
 Bob> sayonara
 Bob> shalom
 Bob> <looking for cyrillic keys> da svedanya
 Bob> - signed off -
 JOEY> I need to go too.
 Myself> U know liz, u didn't ask urslf what u wanted, but u
         considered it
 EFK> Bye Joe.
 EFK> How, John?
 Myself> well, you obviously wanted to spend time <indeterminate amount> with him..
 EFK> yes,
 Myself> and in considering his feelings and wants/needs...
 Myself> you evidently considered that you wanted to meet them.
 EFK> I never thought I was so unselfish.  But I guess you proved me
      wrong!
 Myself> what you did do was to neglect consideration of whether or
         not your want not to marry
 Myself> was of greater import.
 JOEY> Nite all.
 EFK> Night Joe.
 Myself> in fact, you put your need not to marry ahead of his need to
         be.
 Myself> behind that is
 Myself> got my tenses mixed again
 JOEY> - signed off -
 EFK> Thanks for the thought.  I appreciate it.
 Myself> ur wlcm
 Myself> and thanx for the topic.  worked out ok for just a few of us.