• Tag Archives digital archaeology
  • Digital Archaeology: Floppy Disk #14 – ITSOVER.DOC

    A summary for those that haven’t been keeping up with this series:

    I found a number of 5.25″ disks at a thrift store a number of years ago (sometime in the late 1990s to the best of my recollection). I finally got around to acquiring a 5.25″ disk drive and extracting the contents a several years back. Since then, I have been occasionally posting the content here.

    Based on the contents, most or all of these disks were apparently once owned by someone named Connie who used to run the “Close Encounters” Special Interest Group (SIG) on Delphi in the mid 1980s.

    The following description of this SIG was found in a document on one of the disks: “This SIG, known as ‘Close Encounters’, is a forum for the discussion of relationships that develop via computer services like the Source, CompuServe, and Delphi. Our primary emphasis is on the sexual aspects of those relationships.”

    This service was text based and was accessed via a modem and whatever terminal program you had available for your computer to dial in with. Many of these disks have forum messages, e-mails and chat session logs. All of this is pre-internet stuff and I am not aware of any archives in existence today that contain what was on Delphi in the 1980s.

    This post includes the contents of ITSOVER.DOC. It contains a single e-mail dated December 10th, 1984. It’s one person’s opinion (going by the handle of FTF) of the sexual revolution and it is tied in to the topics discussed in the Close Encounters Special Interest Group. It looks like this was sent to three people including the manager of this particular SIG. Contents included below:


    =-=
    ITSOVER.DOC
    =-=



    From:   FTF            10-DEC-1984 20:46  
    To:     PRINCESS,JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj:   IT'S OVER!
    
    The sexual revolution is over!
    
    And I am not sure any of us can say who won...
    
    Sure, you say to yourselves, thats just a gimmick to get us to
    read more and perhaps that is part of what lies behind these
    words.  But consider, for a moment some concepts regarding
    trends of this sort. I certainly will concede that sex is
    alive and well in this United States and most certainly in the
    electronic world! 
    
    But it's different now for some reason.  Look at the types of 
    encounters that get discussed just here for example.  Loving 
    Submission.  Multiple person relationships.  Casual and quite 
    serious relationships.  The Main Event.  Even two years ago,
    would it have been possible on an individual level to discuss
    these events with such an open attitude?  I maintain it would
    have been difficult. 
    
    The sexual revolution was not so much an effort to make more 
    types of sexual contact acceptable.  Behind the closed doors
    of countless bedrooms the variations have always been
    occurring.  No. That was not the point of all of the front
    line actions.  The revolution has always been directed towards
    making us comfortable discussing it and engaging in it.  To
    take the word *dirty* out of what was already happening in the
    trenches. To let us say to ourselves first and later to others
    "You know,  I like sex!"  And then to go one step farther and
    say  "I wish my lover/friend/spouse would try this or not do
    that" and be honest about it.  To find the societal acceptance
    to be able to say that one does indeed have needs and desires.
    
    Of course with the greater awareness of the pleasures come the
    increased awarenesses of the potential dangers as well  - the 
    unwanted diseases - the greater risk of pregnancy - the fact
    that sometimes lovers aren't terribly honest about themselves.
    But those were always there.  We just didn't talk about them.
    
    The sexual revolution is over. I think we all won!

  • Digital Archaeology: Floppy Disk #14 – ITSOVER.DOC


    A summary for those that haven’t been keeping up with this series:

    I found a number of 5.25″ disks at a thrift store a number of years ago (we are talking late 1990s probably). I finally got around to acquiring a 5.25″ disk drive and extracting the contents a several years back. Since then, I have been occasionally posting the content here.

    Based on the contents, at least some of these disks were apparently once owned by someone named Connie who used to run the “Close Encounters” Special Interest Group (SIG) on Delphi in the mid 1980s.

    A description of this SIG was found in a document on one of the disks: “This SIG, known as ‘Close Encounters’, is a forum for the discussion of relationships that develop via computer services like the Source, CompuServe, and Delphi. Our primary emphasis is on the sexual aspects of those relationships.”

    This service was text based and was accessed via whatever terminal program you used on your computer to dial in to Delphi’s servers. Many of these disks have forum messages, e-mails and chat session logs. All of this is pre-internet stuff and I don’t know if there are any archives in existence today of what was on Delphi in the 1980s. In any case, much of this stuff would have been private at the time and probably wouldn’t be in such archives even if they existed.

    This post includes the contents of ITSOVER.DOC. It contains a single e-mail dated December 10th, 1984. It’s one person’s opinion (going by the handle of FTF) of the sexual revolution and it is tied in to the topics discussed in the Close Encounters Special Interest Group. It looks like this was sent to three people including the manager of this particular SIG. Contents included below:


    =-=
    ITSOVER.DOC
    =-=

    From:   FTF            10-DEC-1984 20:46  
    To:     PRINCESS,JOHNMYSELF,CABUYS
    Subj:   IT'S OVER!
    
    The sexual revolution is over!
    
    And I am not sure any of us can say who won...
    
    Sure, you say to yourselves, thats just a gimmick to get us to
    read more and perhaps that is part of what lies behind these
    words.  But consider, for a moment some concepts regarding
    trends of this sort. I certainly will concede that sex is
    alive and well in this United States and most certainly in the
    electronic world! 
    
    But it's different now for some reason.  Look at the types of 
    encounters that get discussed just here for example.  Loving 
    Submission.  Multiple person relationships.  Casual and quite 
    serious relationships.  The Main Event.  Even two years ago,
    would it have been possible on an individual level to discuss
    these events with such an open attitude?  I maintain it would
    have been difficult. 
    
    The sexual revolution was not so much an effort to make more 
    types of sexual contact acceptable.  Behind the closed doors
    of countless bedrooms the variations have always been
    occurring.  No. That was not the point of all of the front
    line actions.  The revolution has always been directed towards
    making us comfortable discussing it and engaging in it.  To
    take the word *dirty* out of what was already happening in the
    trenches. To let us say to ourselves first and later to others
    "You know,  I like sex!"  And then to go one step farther and
    say  "I wish my lover/friend/spouse would try this or not do
    that" and be honest about it.  To find the societal acceptance
    to be able to say that one does indeed have needs and desires.
    
    Of course with the greater awareness of the pleasures come the
    increased awarenesses of the potential dangers as well  - the 
    unwanted diseases - the greater risk of pregnancy - the fact
    that sometimes lovers aren't terribly honest about themselves.
    But those were always there.  We just didn't talk about them.
    
    The sexual revolution is over. I think we all won!
    
    =-=


  • Digital Archaeology: Hewlett Packard xw4100

    The HP Workstation xw4100 was an entry level workstation featuring a Pentium 4 processor. Based on a bit of googling, it seems to have been a popular choice for video editors. At least I found a couple of generally positive reviews from video publications. This machine features:

    • CPU: Pentium 4 @ 2.4 GHz (Northwood)
    • RAM: 2 GB DDR-333
    • Video: nVidia Geforce2 MX400

    For more detailed hardware information, check out the reports from HWiNFO, CPU-Z or HardInfo.

    Early versions of the Pentium 4 earned a pretty bad reputation as being expensive, underperforming power hungry CPUs. They weren’t really much faster (and sometimes slower) than the Pentium III on a per MHz basis. The supposed advantage of the Pentium 4 was that it would be able to scale to very high clock speeds. It turned out that it couldn’t really do that either.

    Having said that, by the time the Northwood variant came along, the Pentium 4 had come into its own and if it couldn’t outright beat the competition (primarily the Athlon XP at the time), then it could at least keep up. By the time the hyperthreaded Pentium 4s came along during this same generation, Intel had regained their lead.

    For a Windows XP machine, a Pentium 4 is a great processor having plenty of speed for pretty much any game and fast for video editing too though at the time we were only talking about DVD resolution stuff. This machine has 2 GB of RAM which is plenty for most things. Windows XP can only see about 3.5 GB so it isn’t like you can go all that much further anyway. However, you could upgrade this machine to 4 GB if you wanted to.

    The weak spot in this machine is probably the Geforce2 MX 400. It’s a pretty low end card for this machine and I suspect that it may not even be what originally came with it. In theory, this machine could run a 32-bit version of Linux reasonably well (given its age anyway) but unfortuantely, neither official nVidia drivers nor open source drivers seem to support this card properly. It seems to be limited to 1024×768 resolution and the video refresh is really slow. In theory, a newer card would fix this issue.

    On the other hand, Windows XP still runs well. If you wanted to use it as a video editing machine for old DV stuff then it would be great. If you wanted to use it for gaming though, you would probably want to find a better AGP video card.

    Other than upgrading the video card and expanding the RAM to 4 GB (which would be especially useful for Linux), you could also upgrade the CPU if you wanted to. It should support at least a 3.06 GHz hyperthreaded Pentium 4. I currently have both Linux and Windows XP installed. However, utnil I get a different video card installed, I’ll probably stick to using Windows XP as it performs much better (and supports the proper resolution).

    Like all of the machines I use, this one has BOINC installed and is participating in various projects including Einstein@home, Asteroids@home and World Community Grid. These seem to be the only three of the six projects I regularly participate in that still support 32-bit. You can see how it is doing overall at FreeDC.