Thursday, December 22, 2011

Ron Paul’s Surge in Iowa Isn’t a Fluke

Republican officials are pushing back on claims in the media and competing GOP campaigns that a likely Ron Paul victory in the January 3 Iowa caucuses would be meaningless because critics view the Texas congressman as a political gadfly.

“It would be a mistake to call an Iowa win by Paul irrelevant,” said a Republican official closely monitoring the campaigns in Iowa.

The main reason: Voters in Iowa believe that Paul is the only candidate in the field with the authenticity to talk about the budget issues they are focused on. “The talk in Iowa is about spending, deficits, and debt, and Ron Paul has been talking about those issues for five years,” said a key official closely monitoring the Iowa race that Paul now leads.

What’s more, as Newt Gingrich’s lead dwindles, it’s Paul and not Mitt Romney who is surging, despite all the spending by Romney’s campaign on TV ads.

“That’s just another indication of the weakness of the Republican field. Don’t blame Ron Paul for surging, blame others like [Mississippi Gov.] Haley Barbour, [Indiana Gov.] Mitch Daniels, and others for not getting into the race. Ron Paul can win and should win this thing. He’s run the smartest campaign and he has the money,” said a key GOP official.

Full article: … in-iowa-isnt-a-fluke

Add comment

Fill out the form below to add your own comments

User data

Add your comment