• Tag Archives Gateway
  • Digital Archaeology: Gateway M-1629

    When looking at another Gateway laptop almost exactly like this one in appearance I pondered when exactly when Gateway’s quality started to decline. I think it may have been with Core 2 Duo era laptops. While previous Pentium M and Turion 64 laptops (nearly identical in construction) may have lost some of the excitement of earlier models, they at least seemed pretty solid and of decent quality. The Turion based laptop I’m looking at here, while it has an attractive silver and red design, it also has a flimsier feeling keyboard and buttons. Still, I would say it holds up better than Dell Inspiron models of similar age.

    The Gateway M-1629 I am looking at here has the following features:

    • CPU: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 @ 2GHz
    • Memory: 3 GB DDR2-666/PC2-5300
    • Video: Radeon Xpress 1270M
    • Screen: 1280×800
    • Hard Drive: Western Digital ATA WDC WD3200BPVT-6 (320 GB)
    • Optical Drive: Optiarc DVD RW AD-7560A

    Check out the output of HardInfo for a more complete look at the hardware.

    This is a lower-end laptop. The CPU is an AMD model which tended to be put in lower end machines because they were cheaper. However, this particular model is quite a bit faster than a similar Pentium (Core 2 Duo variant) laptop I looked at recently. Of course, the Pentium is typically clocked lower and has less cache than a Core 2 Duo. MHz for MHz a Core 2 Duo will be faster but also more expensive. The Turion 64 X2 is based on the K8 architecture so it is essentially the same thing as an Athlon 64 X2 only designed for laptops. The CPU is socketed so theoretically it could be upgraded to a TL-68 model running at 2.4GHz.

    The video hardware is also low end. The Radeon Xpress 1270M is integrated with the chipset and shares system memory. I suppose it is technically a little better than the equivalent Intel solutions at the time but it hardly matters. Neither was sufficient for what would have been modern gaming at the time.

    Vista was the version of Windows that shipped with this laptop. I’m not sure if it was the 32-bit or 64-bit version. It seems like the 32-bit version was typically included as the default install because 64-bit drivers were somewhat less available. Some users likely would have downgraded to Windows XP as well assuming drivers exist to support the hardware. Windows 7 and/or Windows 8 are probably the best choices for a Microsoft OS for this laptop. Any of those are fine for retro use but if you really plan to use it in a modern context then Linux would be the best choice.

    With a low-ish end CPU and a video solution that is near the bottom of the barrel, this was definitely a laptop for bargain hunters. Still, having two cores and a 64-bit processor it is really still good enough to run a modern OS. The cap of 4GB of RAM is actually the biggest limitation. Windows 10 really does better with 8 GB, especially when the rest of your hardware is already low end. However, I’m running a modern version of Xubuntu and it does fine. Web browsing is problematic because modern web browsers are such memory hogs. However, if you stick to 1 or 2 tabs then it is usable, if not exactly snappy. For some reason Firefox, the default browser in Xubuntu, is extremely laggy and seems to constantly eat CPU cycles. Brave does quite a bit better and there are lighter browsers available.

    It’s also still good enough to run BOINC and most projects, at least the ones I am most interested in. You can see how it is doing in Einstein@home, Asteroids@home, and Universe@home or see how it is doing overall at FreeDC.

    The photo at the top and the specs image were taken from The Gateway Computers Wiki. The other images are from the user manual.


  • Digital Archaeology: Gateway GT5464

    I’m not sure when Gateway (formerly Gateway 2000) went from producing among the best pre-built PCs you could get to cheap crap but this machine fits more into the latter category than the former. My first PC was a 486 DX2-66 from Gateway 2000. It was an awesome machine for its time. About four years later, my next PC also game from Gateway, a Pentium II-300. It was also a very solid machine for its time. Sadly, I no longer have either of those but I’ve much more recently acquired an Athlon 700 based Gateway (Select 700 is the model or something like that) and it also seems to be a quality machine (with a unique, seemingly generic brand motherboard that appears to have no conventional capacitors but I digress). In contrast to those machines, the GT5464 seems to have been made with the cheapest, lowest end components available. Gateway bought eMachines in 2004 and I think that is probably roughly the time period in which quality went downhill as well. Instead of building relatively high end machines with quality name-brand components, they started producing primarily low-end machines with the lowest end name brand or generic components. Acer’s purchase in 2007 of Gateway didn’t change that, or if anything, made it worse.

    The motherboard is the Intel D945GCCRG1 which features the 945GC Express chipset with Graphics Intel Media Accelerator 950. Name brand, sure, but probably the lowest end produced by Intel at the time. No doubt Intel and Gateway consider that on-board “Media Accelerator” a feature but it was pretty much the lowest end graphics option at the time. Other highlights include support for two 400MHz or 533MHz DDR2 DIMMs, 6-channel (5.1) onboard audio featuring the RealTek ALC883 audio codec, 1 PCI Express x1 slot, 1 PCI Express x16 slot and two PCI slots, up to 8 USB 2.0 ports (I think this machine has 6), 4 3.0 GB/s SATA ports, 1 IDE ATA-66/100 connector, one disk drive interface (so you can hook up a floppy!), a VGA port for the media accelerator output, 1 parallel port, 1 serial port, a 10/100 Mb/s ethernet port and PS/2 mouse and keyboard ports.

    This motherboard supports LGA775 processors with a 533 or 800 MHz bus. I believe in this case that means Pentium 4 processors from the 500 series, Pentium D, Celeron D and 1st gen Core 2 Duo processors. This machine came with one of those processors that must have failed testing so they disabled components and downclocked it until it worked. That processor being a Pentium E2140. This is a Core 2 Duo based CPU with half the cache (1 MB instead of 2) and clocked at only 1.6 GHz. I’m pretty sure this was literally the lowest end consumer desktop CPU produced at the time. It was slower than many of the Pentium D models and even slower than some of the older Pentium 4s in some tasks. In trying to date this model, I found a Fry’s ad from a September 2007 copy of an Atlanta newspaper that featured this model.

    For complete specs of this particular machine (before upgrades), check out the report from HardInfo.

    The Gateway GT5464 does have a couple of nice touches. Just above the optical drive there is a card reader that features slots for compact flash, SD cards and other types of flash memory as well as two USB ports. Below the optical drive there is an empty slot for expansion and below that there is a “portable media drive bay”. Apparently, this was Gateway’s implementation of a hot swappable external hard drive. You could purchase a drive to plug in here but only from Gateway as the caddy it was in was proprietary as far as I can tell. They were relatively expensive compared to other external drive options and were not available for very long from Gateway. A neat idea but not really executed in the best way. As far as the case goes, I like the dark gray and black color scheme but ultimately it looks and feels much cheaper than Gateway’s earlier off-white cases.

    I installed Xubuntu 20.04 as the OS. Then, while expecting no miracles, I decided to see how this could be upgraded. I ended up grabbing a Core 2 Duo E4700 which I believe is the best processor this motherboard will support. It clocks in at 2.6 GHz (a full 1 GHz faster than that the stock E2140) and features 2 MB of cache. I also replaced the stock 1 GB of RAM (2 x 512 MB @ 400 MHz) with 4 GB (2 x 2 GB DDR2 @ 533 MHz). Apparently this motherboard officially only supports 2 GB but 4 GB works just fine with an up to date BIOS. You have to make sure to flash it with the Intel BIOS for this motherboard, not Gateway’s version. While still no speed demon by modern standards, these simple upgrades go a long way towards making this machine usable. One further upgrade I would like to do is to add a discrete video card. There is 1 PCI Express x16 slot so it should be simple to do. The only drawback is that the power supply is only 300 watts so choices will be limited.

    I haven’t looked to closely but but the motherboard model indicates this is a standard Micro ATX motherboard which presumably means that the power supply and front panel connectors are standard as well. It could still be a custom job for Gateway I suppose. Either way, I don’t really want to spend a fortune updating this thing so a reasonable video card that doesn’t stress the 300 watt power supply is probably the only further upgrade I MIGHT do. It seems an Nvidia GT 1030 might be the best choice as it only uses about 30 watts. But even that is still more than I want to spend on this machine. I could drop down to a GT 730 for around $50 or so but the performance difference is astronomical. There aren’t a great deal of choices when it comes to low power video cards that would provide a meaningful upgrade. I ended up putting a Quadro K600 in it because I happened to have one lying around. Still a massive upgrade relative to what it had.

    One of the things I do with all PCs I play around with, old or new, is to install BOINC so that it can at least do something useful. To see how this particular machine is doing, you can check out https://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=hostbycpid&cpid=15390392fb0a7a843e27e761b70bf8c8