Xref: utzoo news.groups:3707 comp.sys.mac.programmer:800 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls From: sls@dukempd.UUCP (Shelley Shostak) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Anybody home in comp.sources.mac? Message-ID: <673@dukempd.UUCP> Date: 12 May 88 22:12:29 GMT References: <299@spt.entity.com> <5250@cup.portal.com> <6502@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Reply-To: sls@dukempd.UUCP (Shelley Shostak) Organization: Duke University Physics Dept.; Durham, N.C. Lines: 26 Posted: Thu May 12 18:12:29 1988 In article <6502@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> wetter@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (Pierce T. Wetter) writes: >In article <5250@cup.portal.com> Ilan@cup.portal.com writes: >>I second Gail's motion to UNMODERATE comp.sources.mac. The group as it >>currently stands is a poor excuse for a group. If the moderation is > > I third the motion to unmoderate. > I disagree with the idea of unmoderating comp.sources.mac. If unmoderated, the quality of sources will go down. I assume that the moderator compiles and runs the sources he receives, just as the moderator of comp.binaries.mac tries to run the binaries he receives. I don't think I'd waste my time downloading any source unless it was posted by someone whose reputation has been established in somp.sys.mac. I would like to see GOOD WORKING examples of sources, not just ANY examples. Shelley Shostak 1-919-684-8279 Duke University Dept. of Physics sls@dukempd.uucp Durham, N.C. 27706 mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls from BITNET : sls%dukempd@cs.duke.edu -- Shelley Shostak 1-919-684-8279 Duke University Dept. of Physics sls@dukempd.uucp Durham, N.C. 27706 mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls from BITNET : sls%dukempd@cs.duke.edu