Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ames!killer!elg
From: elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Sony vs Commodore
Message-ID: <4011@killer.UUCP>
Date: 8 May 88 04:09:00 GMT
References: <5154@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Distribution: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas
Lines: 16

in article <5154@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>, daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU (Mr Background) says:
> monitors. Is the Sony really that much better than the Commodore? 

In a word: YES. The recent Commodore multi-purpose monitors are very
inexpensive. After all, Amiga 500's and Commodore 128's need monitors, too,
and people who buy those computers can't afford spending hundreds of dollars
more on a high quality monitor.  But if you can afford a better monitor, get
it.  Interlace mode, in particular, is quite miserable on the Commodore
monitor, even with the contrast as low as can be seen (it's decent on the
older Amiga monitors, which also have an etched "bottle" so that you can't see
your face reflecting off the screen).

--
    Eric Lee Green  elg@usl.CSNET    Snail Mail P.O. Box 92191        
    ihnp4!killer!elg                 Lafayette, LA 70509              
"Is a dream a lie that don't come true, or is it something worse?"