Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6965 comp.unix.wizards:8386 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: KSH portability Message-ID: <10806@steinmetz.ge.com> Date: 11 May 88 17:32:00 GMT References: <295@cmtl01.UUCP> <12142@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <631@vsi.UUCP> <4063@mtgzz.UUCP> <341@alice.marlow.reuters.co.uk> Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 19 In article <341@alice.marlow.reuters.co.uk> fox@alice.UUCP (Paul Fox) writes: ... >Well, I managed to get it running on Xenix/386 very easily. Xenix/286 was >a different kettle of fish. In fact I couldnt spare the time to do the work. I ported it to Xenix/286 (2.1.3) by typing "make" and reading a magazine for a while. I don't recall any problems at all (this is the ksh-i versions, the older versions took some doing). I have ported it to Sun, Ultrix, Alliant, 3B1, Convex, and Encore. All were relatively easy, but the Convex version still doesn't have working line editing, due to a bug I don;t have time to chase. It doesn't ALWAYS self install so smoothly, but the changes are usually in the makefiles (and scripts) rather than the code. -- bill davidsen (wedu@ge-crd.arpa) {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me