Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!udel!burdvax!psuvax1!gondor.cs.psu.edu!schwartz
From: schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz)
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: editor
Message-ID: <3568@psuvax1.psu.edu>
Date: 8 May 88 20:40:42 GMT
References: <2266@polyslo.UUCP> <10000006@snail>
Sender: netnews@psuvax1.psu.edu
Reply-To: schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz)
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 10

In article <10000006@snail> carroll@snail.CS.UIUC.EDU writes:
>>If not, how can anyone tolerate VI?
>Lack of choice. It's a lot better than "ed", or "cat".

Here is an anecdote for y'all.  I know someone who is one of two
users on a Sun 4.  His editor of choice is ed, even though vi and
emacs are available.  It does what he wants, as fast as he wants.
To each his own, I always say.

-- Scott Schwartz     schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu    schwartz@psuvaxg.bitnet