Xref: utzoo news.groups:3707 comp.sys.mac.programmer:800
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls
From: sls@dukempd.UUCP (Shelley Shostak)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Anybody home in comp.sources.mac?
Message-ID: <673@dukempd.UUCP>
Date: 12 May 88 22:12:29 GMT
References: <299@spt.entity.com> <5250@cup.portal.com> <6502@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Reply-To: sls@dukempd.UUCP (Shelley Shostak)
Organization: Duke University Physics Dept.; Durham, N.C.
Lines: 26
Posted: Thu May 12 18:12:29 1988

In article <6502@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> wetter@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (Pierce T. Wetter) writes:
>In article <5250@cup.portal.com> Ilan@cup.portal.com writes:
>>I second Gail's motion to UNMODERATE comp.sources.mac. The group as it
>>currently stands is a poor excuse for a group.  If the moderation is
>
>   I third the motion to unmoderate.
>

I disagree with the idea of unmoderating comp.sources.mac.

   If unmoderated, the quality of sources will go down. I assume that the
   moderator compiles and runs the sources he receives, just as the moderator
   of comp.binaries.mac tries to run the binaries he receives. I don't think
   I'd waste my time downloading any source unless it was posted by someone
   whose reputation has been established in somp.sys.mac. I would like to
   see GOOD WORKING examples of sources, not just ANY examples.
 
	Shelley Shostak				1-919-684-8279
	Duke University Dept. of Physics	sls@dukempd.uucp
	Durham, N.C.      27706			mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls
                                  from BITNET : sls%dukempd@cs.duke.edu
-- 
	Shelley Shostak				1-919-684-8279
	Duke University Dept. of Physics	sls@dukempd.uucp
	Durham, N.C.      27706			mcnc!duke!dukempd!sls
                                  from BITNET : sls%dukempd@cs.duke.edu