Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!dcs!wnp From: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: How to eliminate the cost of over 1/5 (or more) of net traffic Keywords: costs binaries Message-ID: <87@dcs.UUCP> Date: 12 May 88 12:25:23 GMT References: <1616@looking.UUCP> <17@idsnh.UUCP> Reply-To: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Organization: DCS, Dallas, Texas Lines: 34 In article <17@idsnh.UUCP> ben@.UUCP (Ben Smith) writes: > >Many may feel that this sounds like a lot of work. But if they were to >consider that eventually they have to share the costs of sending non-critical >data through a pricey communications system, they might see the common >sense of using diskettes and land based mail. The above referenced article >is sensible and should be used as a first draft of a RFC. >-ben The poster of the referenced article himself included the statement "It probably won't work." Why? Currently, in many companies and organizations the cost of USENET transmissions is assumed as a matter of course to be a part of the phone bill; no special approval or budget category is reqired. I'm not sure that the management in many of these organizations even knows what they are paying for. If you reduce net traffic by putting voluminous groups onto distributable media, these companies' financial officers will rejoice in the lower phone bill, but fail to see why they should approve purchase requisitions or check requests for the acquisition of source code which may or may not be relevant to the company's purpose. It's a lot easier to spend thousands of dollars on an already-approved item such as phone bills, than to spend a tenth of that amount on an unapproved, unbudgeted item like public domain sources distributions. -- Wolf N. Paul * 3387 Sam Rayburn Run * Carrollton TX 75007 * (214) 306-9101 UUCP: ihnp4!killer!dcs!wnp ESL: 62832882 INTERNET: wnp@DESEES.DAS.NET or wnp@dcs.UUCP TLX: 910-280-0585 EES PLANO UD