Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!ritzenth From: ritzenth@bgsuvax.UUCP (Phil Ritzenthaler) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: EMACS better than Vi? Message-ID: <2135@bgsuvax.UUCP> Date: 10 May 88 16:25:32 GMT References: <449@novavax.UUCP> <10000003@snail> <52207@sun.uucp> <52330@sun.uucp> Organization: The Land Beneath the Forest Moon of Endor Lines: 15 In article <52330@sun.uucp>, limes@sun.uucp (Greg Limes) writes: > > Some interesting EMACS features: > > Compile, toss the errors in a *compilation* window (while you edit > something else), and step from error to error in the source code OK . . . this is one I really like . . . just how do you do this using fortran? -- Phil Ritzenthaler UUCP :.!cbosgd!osu-cis!bgsuvax!ritzenth ARPA : ritzenth@andy.bgsu.edu "Remember, OPRAH spelled backwards is HARPO (toot-toot)!" -- Anonymous