Xref: utzoo soc.women:11013 alt.flame:1900 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!mejac!decwrl!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!nick From: nick@hp-sdd.HP.COM (Nick Flor) Newsgroups: alt.sex,soc.women,alt.flame Subject: Re: Accosting women on the street (was: Re: CTs) Keywords: rape, tease Message-ID: <1273@hp-sdd.HP.COM> Date: 11 May 88 01:43:31 GMT References: <3910@gryphon.CTS.COM> <1270@hp-sdd.HP.COM> <4595@super.upenn.edu> Reply-To: nick@hp-sdd.UUCP (Nick Flor) Distribution: alt Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Lines: 49 In article <4595@super.upenn.edu> remaker@eniac.seas.upenn.edu.UUCP (Phillip A. Remaker) writes: > >Nick, it is one thing to have accosted women, but it is an entirely different >thing to parade around saying "Yeah, I'm so cool because I intimidate >women." I have never accosted a woman on the street in my life because I >was taught that such lewd advances were very rude. You had no such upbringing, >and society is that much worse off for it. > Phillip, it is one thing to be stupid, and another thing to be brainless. I suspect you fall into the latter category. A) You failed to see the context in which the "accosting" was done. (you know, high school, kiddie days, golden years) B) You failed to see that the point I was trying to make was that just because one is subject to verbal abuse is no reason to quake in fear. It may be that the verbal abuser is an adolescent doing something silly. C) You failed to read my other postings which mentioned that I did not just verbally abuse women, it was anyone on the street who we felt like doing it to. D) You failed to have a brain by making such sweeping generalizations as: "You had no such upbringing and society is that much worst off for it." Don't make me laugh. >And if your sole goal is to piss people >off (as evidenced by cross posting such remarks to soc.women), then >move to talk.bizarre where you can commune with your own. Some idiot edited the original header and cross posted to soc.women. I admit that I was being stupid by not re-editing it myself. I won't edit out soc.women, because I want to clear the air as to what the posting was really about. >Heres wishing to years of your impotence! At least that's an original statement. >Phillip A. Remaker, B.S.E., E.E., 1989 | University Of Pennsylvania Gee, I thought you had to have some sort of reading comprehension in order to graduate. Nick -- + Disclaimer: The above opinions are my own, not necessarily my employer's. + + Oh, sure. Sure. I'm going. But I got | Nick V. Flor * * o * * + + your number, see? And one of these | Hewlett Packard SDD * * /I\ * * + + days, the joke's gonna be on you. | ..hplabs!hp-sdd!nick * * / \ * * +