Path: utzoo!hoptoad!dasys1!jsb From: jsb@dasys1.UUCP (The Invisible Man) Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame Subject: Re: Accosting women on the street (was: Re: CTs) Message-ID: <4387@dasys1.UUCP> Date: 11 May 88 13:24:21 GMT References: <3910@gryphon.CTS.COM> <1270@hp-sdd.HP.COM> <4595@super.upenn.edu> <1273@hp-sdd.HP.COM> Reply-To: jsb@dasys1.UUCP (The Invisible Man) Distribution: alt Organization: Kentucky Fried Software Lines: 36 In article <1273@hp-sdd.HP.COM> nick@hp-sdd.UUCP (Nick Flor) writes: :A) You failed to see the context in which the "accosting" was done. : (you know, high school, kiddie days, golden years) Ah yes, but the abusive highscool personality you claim to have outgrown still shines through today! So now you've gone ahead to abuse people on the net. :B) You failed to see that the point I was trying to make was that : just because one is subject to verbal abuse is no reason to quake : in fear. It may be that the verbal abuser is an adolescent doing : something silly. And *this* point is consistent with your previous point: namely, If in your opinion the person you're abusing should not be afraid, its OK. In fact, people who are afraid when *you* think they shouldn't be are even more worthy of your abuse for this reason. :C) You failed to read my other postings which mentioned that I did not : just verbally abuse women, it was anyone on the street who we : felt like doing it to. No need to add to this point except to say I hope I fail to read all your postings forever. :D) You failed to have a brain by making such sweeping generalizations : as: "You had no such upbringing and society is that much worst off : for it." Don't make me laugh. In this, you were being given the benifit of the doubt and allowed to blame your parents for your personality. I'm not so generous. I blame you. -- Jim Baumbach @Big Electric Cat New York City {uunet}!mstan\ or uunet!actnyc!jsb {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!jsb . {sun}!hoptoad/ "Notitiae gratia notitiarum"