Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.mail.headers,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs vs. sendmail - battle of the titans
Message-ID: <8034@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 11:21:47 EST
Article-I.D.: steinmet.8034
Posted: Tue Dec  1 11:21:47 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Dec-87 22:25:41 EST
References: <8013@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: na
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 11
Keywords: GNU Emacs, sendmail
Xref: mnetor comp.emacs:2473 comp.mail.headers:226 comp.unix.wizards:5726

In article <8013@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> montanaro@ge-crd.arpa (Skip Montanaro) writes:
| Internet mail to our local network of Suns goes through a VMS VAX which adds
| a little something extra to return addresses. For instance, zip@zap.domain is

One of the other burning questions is, should the "Reply-to:" field
override all others and be used instead of any from field. That would
solve your problem, if only everybody's mailers did the same thing.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me