Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mcnc!duke!gleicher From: gleicher@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael Gleicher) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Mac ][ C compilers Message-ID: <10814@duke.cs.duke.edu> Date: 12 Dec 87 15:05:30 GMT Organization: Duke University CS Dept.; Durham, NC Lines: 21 Keywords: LSC vs Aztec (I know this debate has been had before, but I'm a new convert to the Mac Universe) Can anyone tell me the relative merits/demerits of Aztec C (or some other inexpensive development environment) vs. LightSpeed on the Mac ][. LightSpeed is what everyone seems to recommend, but Aztec says it has a symbolic debugger (any good? I'm used to codeview on a PC and dbx on UNIX) make (does LSC have this?) and unlimited data size (this is important as I hope to port a prolog compiler from UNIX eventually, does LSC let you have huge memory spaces? - I want to have as much of my 5 megs for heap as possible) Thanks, Mike Michael Lee Gleicher (-: If it looks like I'm wandering Duke University (-: around like I'm lost . . . E-Mail: gleicher@cs.duke.edu)(or uucp (-: Or P.O.B. 5899 D.S., Durham, NC 27706 (-: It's because I am!