Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!sco!ericg
From: ericg@sco.COM (Mwa ha ha)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Please Read ATARI (attn:Neil Harris)..
Message-ID: <401@viscous>
Date: 9 Dec 87 20:25:58 GMT
References: <871121-091947-2721@Xerox> <13852@felix.UUCP>
Reply-To: ericg@sco.COM (Mwa ha ha)
Organization: SCO Quality Assurance
Lines: 33

preston@felix.UUCP (Preston Bannister) wrote in article <13852@felix.UUCP>:
]In article <871121-091947-2721@Xerox> Brantly.henr@Xerox.COM writes:
][much deleted]
]>
]>Heck Neil, even the guys/gals with color monitors would like to video
]>tape stuff from their machines.....
]
]I second the motion. :-)  
]
]I can understand Atari leaving the RF modulator off the 1040ST
](although I think the reasoning as a bit cockeyed).  But, I _would_
]like to have one on my machine.
]
]Now, I imagine that coming up with an upgrade probably wouldn't be
]profitable for Atari.  Let me suggest an alternative.
]
]Neil, why don't you see if Atari could least sell us the parts we need
]to put in an RF modulator?  I'm sure that some enterprising people
]will come forward and offer to do the upgrades.  It would cost Atari
]nothing, build some goodwill and possibly even give Atari's dealers a
]little more business.
>

I know I have a rare exception, but my 1040 (purchased in October) 
DOES have an RF modulator, which I do not use.

I'm considering holding an auction :-)


-- 
Eric Griswold  (ericg@sco.COM)
"That's no baby.  That's a Mr. Potatohead"
I do not speak for SCO, I barely have enough room for my own opinions.