Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff
From: duff@eraserhead.steinmetz (David A Duff)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: RMAIL/Babyl format
Message-ID: <8030@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 09:04:21 EST
Article-I.D.: steinmet.8030
Posted: Tue Dec  1 09:04:21 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Dec-87 22:24:06 EST
References: <12312@think.UUCP>
Sender: root@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP
Reply-To: uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff (David A Duff)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 20

In article <12312@think.UUCP> rlk@THINK.COM writes:
>Let's see if I remember my BNF for babyl files; this corresponds to
>version 5:
>[...]

Is this truly a standard?  Last time I tried processing a file with ZMAIL and
then using RMAIL on it, RMAIL bombed in a big way.  Has this changed?  Are
ZMAIL and RMAIL using the same Babyl version number? 

>cca >>>>>>>>>>  |
>harvard >>>>>>  |
>bloom-beacon >  |think!rlk	Robert Krawitz 
>rutgers >>>>>>  |
>ihnp4 >>>>>>>>  .



Dave Duff (duffd@ge-crd.ARPA, uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff)
General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center
Schenectady, New York   ph. 518-387-5649