Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ukma!david From: david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Looking for a fast modem < $1000. Message-ID: <7826@g.ms.uky.edu> Date: Sun, 6-Dec-87 20:24:42 EST Article-I.D.: g.7826 Posted: Sun Dec 6 20:24:42 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Dec-87 01:16:32 EST References: <48400001@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <7753@g.ms.uky.edu> <8093@ism780c.UUCP> Reply-To: david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences Lines: 29 In article <8093@ism780c.UUCP> tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) writes: >david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) writes: >< I have only one reservation. >< >< It's a proprietary protocol which will only work with Trailblazers. >I seem to recall that the proposed standards ( e.g., from ISO ) suck. >They do things like fall back from 9600 to 4800 if there is too much >line noise. The Trailblazer is much better. I completely understand and agree. The trailblazer will fall back as well, but in 300 baud speed increments instead of 4800 baud increments. However, one version of reality is that the PTT's in various countries control sales of modems within their countries. Also .. those very same PTT's are what makes up ISO. (at least as far as communications standards are concerned). This gives modems adhering to the ISO protocols an advantage in built-in sales even though the Telebit protocol is superior in many many many ways. Another version of reality is that if Telebit makes enough of a market niche, then they'll become a defacto standard which the PTT's will have to pay attention to because of pressure from their customers. -- <---- David Herron -- The E-Mail guy<---- or: {rutgers,uunet,cbosgd}!ukma!david, david@UKMA.BITNET <---- <---- Classic beer bellies aren't born! They're made!