Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff From: duff@eraserhead.steinmetz (David A Duff) Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: RMAIL/Babyl format Message-ID: <8030@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 09:04:21 EST Article-I.D.: steinmet.8030 Posted: Tue Dec 1 09:04:21 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Dec-87 22:24:06 EST References: <12312@think.UUCP> Sender: root@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP Reply-To: uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff (David A Duff) Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 20 In article <12312@think.UUCP> rlk@THINK.COM writes: >Let's see if I remember my BNF for babyl files; this corresponds to >version 5: >[...] Is this truly a standard? Last time I tried processing a file with ZMAIL and then using RMAIL on it, RMAIL bombed in a big way. Has this changed? Are ZMAIL and RMAIL using the same Babyl version number? >cca >>>>>>>>>> | >harvard >>>>>> | >bloom-beacon > |think!rlk Robert Krawitz>rutgers >>>>>> | >ihnp4 >>>>>>>> . Dave Duff (duffd@ge-crd.ARPA, uunet!steinmetz!eraserhead!duff) General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center Schenectady, New York ph. 518-387-5649