Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!uwmacc!uwmcsd1!lakesys!steven From: steven@lakesys.UUCP (Steven Goodman) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Microsoft dropping Xenix Message-ID: <309@lakesys.UUCP> Date: Sat, 5-Dec-87 13:44:46 EST Article-I.D.: lakesys.309 Posted: Sat Dec 5 13:44:46 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 10-Dec-87 19:38:50 EST References: <4610@well.UUCP> <432@spdcc.COM> Reply-To: steven@lakesys.UUCP (Steven Goodman) Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee, WI Lines: 25 Keywords: Microport Real Unix I can't agree more, SCO's support is nothing less than "Premium". There are absolutly no instances I can recall where SCO's support hasn't been able to solve my problems (and 99% of them are my problems NOT the OS's). Everything runs smooth and I must say that SCO version of Unix keeps a smile on my face. I cannot speak for the performance of Microport seeing as I was fortunite enough to deside against it (Phew!). Although I have spoken with individuals whom have recently switch from Microport to SCO (you know who you are) and I have received nothing but excellent feedback as to the switch. A typical example of SCO's support happened quite recently where I needed to drive my ports at 19,200 and also send some characters not supported by SCO's uucico (Telebit TrailBlazer stuff), I called SCO and within a couple of days a new uucico and a new cu was delivered and works fine (Thanks James). In my opinion there is simply nothing more important than a stable system with a GREAT support team behind it. -- Steven Goodman | Lake Systems Milwaukee, Wisconsin | "A smart man talks, 1 (414) 744-7033 | a wise man listens" UUCP: {ihnp4,uwvax}!uwmcsd1!lakesys!steven |