Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!vrdxhq!verdix!ogcvax!littlei!omepd!mipos3!intelca!oliveb!epimass!csi!varian!ptsfa!dsp
From: dsp@ptsfa.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: retraction
Message-ID: <3037@ptsfa.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Jun-87 22:16:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: ptsfa.3037
Posted: Wed Jun  3 22:16:23 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 20:12:33 EDT
References: <9729@clyde.ATT.COM> <3767@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <16895@amdcad.AMD.COM> <3788@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <16959@amdcad.AMD.COM> <3842@jade
Lines: 27

4 Jun 87 05:16:23 GMT
Reply-To: dsp@ptsfa.UUCP (David St.Pierre)
Followup-To: ba.test
Distribution: ba
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 20

In article <3842@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> era1987@violet.berkeley.edu () writes:
>Are you saying that the Well didn't pay anyone for their newsfeed?

As well's main feed, I can say "Yes, that's what he's saying".

>I can understand supplying a feed to somebody who isn't going to profit
>from it, and will help bear the expense, without asking anything in
>return, but if I knew it were going to somebody who intended to resell it
>at a profit, I might consider some consideration.

Gee, if I did that, does *my* feed have the right to charge me?
Because I feed a consultant who may get a job tip, should I charge him?

Actually, I *have* profited from access to the net. I've gotten a lot
of nice software, made a few friends and shared a few experiences.
I think I'm profit a lot more if I didn't have to wade thru articles
like these.
-- 
David St. Pierre    415/823-6800  {ihnp4,lll-crg,ames,pyramid}!ptsfa!dsp
It's not his bag of tea.