Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.mail.headers,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: GNU Emacs vs. sendmail - battle of the titans Message-ID: <8034@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 11:21:47 EST Article-I.D.: steinmet.8034 Posted: Tue Dec 1 11:21:47 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Dec-87 22:25:41 EST References: <8013@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) Distribution: na Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 11 Keywords: GNU Emacs, sendmail Xref: mnetor comp.emacs:2473 comp.mail.headers:226 comp.unix.wizards:5726 In article <8013@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> montanaro@ge-crd.arpa (Skip Montanaro) writes: | Internet mail to our local network of Suns goes through a VMS VAX which adds | a little something extra to return addresses. For instance, zip@zap.domain is One of the other burning questions is, should the "Reply-to:" field override all others and be used instead of any from field. That would solve your problem, if only everybody's mailers did the same thing. -- bill davidsen (wedu@ge-crd.arpa) {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me