Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cfa!ward
From: ward@cfa.harvard.EDU (Steve Ward)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: IBM/Microsoft PC/MS-DOS: Last version or not?
Message-ID: <838@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU>
Date: 10 Dec 87 22:45:50 GMT
References: <1661@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. for Astrophysics
Lines: 27
Keywords: IBM Microsoft DOS
Summary: more ms/pc dos to come...

In article <1661@bsu-cs.UUCP>, mithomas@bsu-cs.UUCP (Michael Thomas Niehaus) writes:
> Well, everyone.  It is now time for you to make up your mind.  Is MS-DOS
> 3.3 the last version or not.  Many people have said that it is; others have
> said that it isn't.  Which is it?
> 
> I'm looking for someone who knows what they are talking about, if such a 
> person truly exists (and can prove it).
> 
> Michael Niehaus
> UUCP: ...!{uunet,pur-ee,iuvax}!bsu-cs!mithomas


Hold your horses, here comes MS-DOS/PC-DOS 3.3x and probably 3.4, too.

Microsoft had already planned to roll in the Compaq-inspired support for
greater-than-32MB hard disks that Compaq developed jointly with
Microsoft, thus engendering 3.3x (x being a digit on the order of 1-3).

However, the Desqview competition has encouraged Microsoft to come out
with DOS support for extended memory and limited multitasking similar to
the Desqview product.  There is rumor that these features may appear in
two steps, with the final product being 3.4 sometime between late spring
and mid summer.

I do not have any "insider" info, but trade rags abound with discussions
of these rumors, some with quotations from (reliable?) Microsoft
sources.