Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!uwmacc!uwmcsd1!lakesys!steven
From: steven@lakesys.UUCP (Steven Goodman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Microsoft dropping Xenix
Message-ID: <309@lakesys.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 5-Dec-87 13:44:46 EST
Article-I.D.: lakesys.309
Posted: Sat Dec  5 13:44:46 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 10-Dec-87 19:38:50 EST
References: <4610@well.UUCP> <432@spdcc.COM>
Reply-To: steven@lakesys.UUCP (Steven Goodman)
Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee, WI
Lines: 25
Keywords: Microport Real Unix


I can't agree more, SCO's support is nothing less than "Premium".  
There are absolutly no instances I can recall where SCO's support
hasn't been able to solve my problems (and 99% of them are my 
problems NOT the OS's).  Everything runs smooth and I must say
that SCO version of Unix keeps a smile on my face.  I cannot speak
for the performance of Microport seeing as I was fortunite enough to
deside against it (Phew!).  Although I have spoken with individuals
whom have recently switch from Microport to SCO (you know who you are)
and I have received nothing but excellent feedback as to the switch.

A typical example of SCO's support happened quite recently where I needed
to drive my ports at 19,200 and also send some characters not supported
by SCO's uucico (Telebit TrailBlazer stuff), I called SCO and within a 
couple of days a new uucico and a new cu was delivered and works fine
(Thanks James).

In my opinion there is simply nothing more important than a stable system
with a GREAT support team behind it.

-- 
Steven Goodman                               |
Lake Systems   Milwaukee, Wisconsin          |      "A smart man talks,
1 (414) 744-7033                             |       a wise man listens"
UUCP:  {ihnp4,uwvax}!uwmcsd1!lakesys!steven  |