Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stc!datlog!slxsys!jpp From: jpp@slxsys.specialix.co.uk (John Pettitt) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: smail2.5 Message-ID: <106@slxsys.specialix.co.uk> Date: 3 Dec 87 06:44:07 GMT References: <484@rel.eds.com> Reply-To: jpp@slxsys.UUCP (John Pettitt) Organization: Specialix International, London, UK. Lines: 27 Keywords: At last, a 'real' mailer for Xenix (are you listening SCO) :-) Summary: smail on xenix without writing new programs In article <484@rel.eds.com> bob@rel.eds.com (Bob Leffler) writes: >During the last several weeks there have been numerous solutions posted to >the net to resolved the interface problem with Xenix and smail 2.5. I >have tried all the solutions that I am aware of and my conclusion for the >best approach is a combination of two. lots of stuff about how to install smail deleted. I have just installed smail 2.5 on Xenix 386. The solution I used here was to replace /usr/lib/mail/execmail with a link to (copy of) /bin/smail. I also moved the old sco execmail to execmail.sco and used it as the local delivery agent. The above will not work as it stands because the command syntax for execmail is not the same as smail. This can be corrected by swapping the meaning of the -F and -f switches in smail (main.c and defs.h). The local delivery macro in defs.h should be set to give /usr/lib/mail/execmail.com -f from to. With this setup you get the sco mailer (mailx) and smail with both From and From: lines correct. Also as execmail is still used for 'local' delivery micnet (sco's RS232 "LAN") still works. -- John Pettitt G6KCQ, CIX jpettitt, Voice +44 1 398 9422 UUCP: ...uunet!mcvax!ukc!pyrltd!slxsys!jpp (jpp@slxsys.co.uk) Disclaimer: I don't even own a cat to share my views !