Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!ima!cfisun!susans From: susans@cfi.COM (susans) Newsgroups: rec.birds Subject: Skippy, what's wrong with you? Message-ID: <31@cfiprod.UUCP> Date: 14 Dec 87 16:01:40 GMT References: <9086@utzoo.UUCP> Reply-To: susans@cfiprod.UUCP (Susan Scheide -CFI-) Organization: Consumer Financial Institute, Waltham, Mass. Lines: 56 Summary: New Phobia at Univ. of Toronto Followup-To:Re: Domestic Parrots.... Original poster writes: >>Also, I'm not going to >>waste my time digging through the dog, cat, and goldfish articles to >>find the one or two articles a day about birds (NOTE: I do like all >>three of the aforementioned pets--I just don't like to read about them). > In article <9086@utzoo.UUCP> sciurid@utzoo.UUCP (skippy) writes: >Ah. Here is the real truth. There is a weeny group of parrot >owners who rightly ought to post their articles in rec.pets. But >they cann't be bothered to read through all the non-parrot postings. >They are even too lazy to press their `n' key or set up a kill file. >So, surprise, here is a group called `rec.birds' which isn't even >used that much. And who cares if dumping drivel about domestic parrots >is not what the group was set up for. There is the word `birds' in the >name, after all (maybe the `chick' and `bird' watchers in soc.singles >should post here too). >And why be bothered to set up a new special interest group--it is >too easy not to. > >Name: Skippy >Mail: Dept. Zoology, Univ. Toronto > Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1 >UUCP: {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!sciurid Oh Skippy, Skippy, Skippy. I didn't even have to LOOK at the sender of the message 9086 to know it was from the Univ. of Toronto. Has anyone else in netland noticed the pompous, condescending tone these "gentlemen" seem to be honor-bound to adopt when posting. I honestly believe I have discovered some new phobia running rampant in Toronto. These alleged zoologists all seem to hate pet birds. Why? Is it because they are against parrots or against keeping birds as pets? Did they all have terrible childhoods without pets of their own to love? I would be sincerely interested in hearing what exactly it is you seem to have against pet birds -- speaking "Skippy" only for yourself. Perhaps there are some people up there who don't fit my generalization - you can say "generalization" can't you? Sure, you did already! >Besides, only a fool bothers to follow guidelines. As it has been noted many times, the file containing descriptions of groups doesn't say "pet birds excluded." I believe it says "Discussion of birds and birdwatching." Tool. -- Susan Scheide (susans) "Another friend of Bill's"