Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ames!elroy!cit-vax!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!cbosgd!mandrill!neoucom!wtm
From: wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Hard disk questions
Message-ID: <822@neoucom.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Dec-87 23:53:46 EST
Article-I.D.: neoucom.822
Posted: Sun Dec 6 23:53:46 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Dec-87 01:05:16 EST
References: <2312@unc.cs.unc.edu>
Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Lines: 32
Summary: which one depends on what you do most of the time
<>
A general rule of thumb is that faster is better; obviously, the
wallet is a mitigating factor.
Disk caching programs can make up partially for drive slowness. A
cache will slightly slow down througput due to the extra layer of
software added, but will dramatically enhance performance for
repetatively accessed data. This is good in dbase-like programs.
For programs where a datum is only used once, cahcing is not
helpful. I have tested Vcache, Lightning, and one from Paul Mace
software. Lightning did the best with the least memory.
RLL drives will improve throughput somewhat becuase they have a
higher data transfer rate. Since the drive still turns the same
speed as non-RLL, but has 150% the data, the xfer rate is 150% of
normal.
The ST-277 sounds good on paper. I don't have one here yet. I do
have a lot of ST-238s. While there has been bitching on the Net
about '238s ours have all held up so far. I stated installing '238
last January. Look around for deals on the Seagate ST-4051. It is
a pretty good full-height 40 meg drive.
My personal favorite are the Microscience Miniscribe series. The
72 meg 6085 is quite good. I've seen it for as little as $799. I
suppose a weakness of the 6085 is that it has a servo surface on
one of the platters, that if messed up, would probably send the
drive out to lunch. I haven't seen that happen though.
--Bill