Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!pyramid!fmsrl7!wayne From: wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga serial questions Message-ID: <5279@fmsrl7.UUCP> Date: Sun, 6-Dec-87 21:32:05 EST Article-I.D.: fmsrl7.5279 Posted: Sun Dec 6 21:32:05 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Dec-87 08:41:23 EST References: <4558@pyr.gatech.EDU> <1303@saturn.ucsc.edu> <2893@cbmvax.UUCP> <5171@fmsrl7.UUCP> <1333@saturn.ucsc.edu> Reply-To: wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP (/\/\ichael R. \/\/ayne) Distribution: na Organization: Ford Motor Company, Scientific Research Labs, Dearborn, MI Lines: 15 Keywords: Serial speeds, terminal emulation Observant readers will note that I prefaced my remark with a pessamistic prediction... Anyway, for the curious, I was looking to do some real-time data acquisition from a device that does not support flow control. Note also that I mentioned that tek emulation was "desireable". This is actually for another project with similar specs (simple vector drawing only). Anyway, I have seen terminals that will keep up with continuous 9600 without flow control, I had hoped that the Amiga could be convinced to do a bit better and go 19.2K. Looks like I'll have to look elsewhere. /\/\ \/\/ -- Michael R. Wayne *** TMC & Associates *** INTERNET: wayne@ford-vax.arpa uucp: {philabs | pyramid} !fmsrl7!wayne OR wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP >> If you own an MPulse, please contact me to exchange info and experiences <<