Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!pyramid!fmsrl7!wayne
From: wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Amiga serial questions
Message-ID: <5279@fmsrl7.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Dec-87 21:32:05 EST
Article-I.D.: fmsrl7.5279
Posted: Sun Dec  6 21:32:05 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Dec-87 08:41:23 EST
References: <4558@pyr.gatech.EDU> <1303@saturn.ucsc.edu> <2893@cbmvax.UUCP> <5171@fmsrl7.UUCP> <1333@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Reply-To: wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP (/\/\ichael R. \/\/ayne)
Distribution: na
Organization: Ford Motor Company, Scientific Research Labs, Dearborn, MI
Lines: 15
Keywords: Serial speeds, terminal emulation


	Observant readers will note that I prefaced my remark with a
pessamistic prediction...  Anyway, for the curious, I was looking to do some
real-time data acquisition from a device that does not support flow control.
Note also that I mentioned that tek emulation was "desireable".  This is
actually for another project with similar specs (simple vector drawing only).
Anyway, I have seen terminals that will keep up with continuous 9600 without
flow control, I had hoped that the Amiga could be convinced to do a bit
better and go 19.2K.  Looks like I'll have to look elsewhere.

/\/\ \/\/
-- 
Michael R. Wayne  ***  TMC & Associates  ***  INTERNET: wayne@ford-vax.arpa
uucp: {philabs | pyramid} !fmsrl7!wayne   OR   wayne@fmsrl7.UUCP
>> If you own an MPulse, please contact me to exchange info and experiences <<