Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!vrdxhq!verdix!ogcvax!littlei!omepd!mipos3!intelca!oliveb!epimass!csi!varian!ptsfa!dsp From: dsp@ptsfa.UUCP Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: retraction Message-ID: <3037@ptsfa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 3-Jun-87 22:16:23 EDT Article-I.D.: ptsfa.3037 Posted: Wed Jun 3 22:16:23 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 20:12:33 EDT References: <9729@clyde.ATT.COM> <3767@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <16895@amdcad.AMD.COM> <3788@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <16959@amdcad.AMD.COM> <3842@jade Lines: 27 4 Jun 87 05:16:23 GMT Reply-To: dsp@ptsfa.UUCP (David St.Pierre) Followup-To: ba.test Distribution: ba Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA Lines: 20 In article <3842@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> era1987@violet.berkeley.edu () writes: >Are you saying that the Well didn't pay anyone for their newsfeed? As well's main feed, I can say "Yes, that's what he's saying". >I can understand supplying a feed to somebody who isn't going to profit >from it, and will help bear the expense, without asking anything in >return, but if I knew it were going to somebody who intended to resell it >at a profit, I might consider some consideration. Gee, if I did that, does *my* feed have the right to charge me? Because I feed a consultant who may get a job tip, should I charge him? Actually, I *have* profited from access to the net. I've gotten a lot of nice software, made a few friends and shared a few experiences. I think I'm profit a lot more if I didn't have to wade thru articles like these. -- David St. Pierre 415/823-6800 {ihnp4,lll-crg,ames,pyramid}!ptsfa!dsp It's not his bag of tea.