Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nbires!hao!noao!stsci!barsh From: barsh@stsci.EDU (John Barshinger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Lattice C 4.0 / 68000 vs. 68010 Performance Message-ID: <116@obi-wan> Date: Wed, 25-Nov-87 14:38:50 EST Article-I.D.: obi-wan.116 Posted: Wed Nov 25 14:38:50 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Nov-87 09:01:09 EST References: <111@obi-wan> Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218 Lines: 20 in article <111@obi-wan>, barsh@stsci.EDU (John Barshinger) says: > > The following is my experience with the Lattice 4.0 compiler and > utilizing the 68010 instead of the 68000 in my AMIGA... > This is in response to the mail messages I have been getting regarding the above named performance analysis: Numbers 7 & 8 (the drystone program executions) are not time values. They are number of drystones executed per second average. The moral of the story is DRYer is indeed better... jrbii ~~~~~ -- John Barshinger Space Telescope Science Institute Baltimore, MD 21218 plink:jrbii | bix:jrbii | barsh@stsci.edu