Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!uwvax!oddjob!hao!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!scgvaxd!trwrb!aero!venera.isi.edu!sllu
From: sllu@venera.isi.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lsi
Subject: MOSIS TINY FRAME PADS (28PC23x34 FRAME)
Message-ID: <4218@venera.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 1-Dec-87 20:49:13 EST
Article-I.D.: venera.4218
Posted: Tue Dec  1 20:49:13 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Dec-87 16:17:19 EST
Organization: USC-Information Sciences Institute
Lines: 28
Keywords: Magic DRC violations, I/O pad drivers, MOSIS, VLSI class

Dear MOSIS users,

There has been some confusion as to why MOSIS is distributing a set
of pads for her TINY CHIP frame (28pc23x34) with Magic
(Berkeley VLSI layout tool) design rule checker (DRC) violations.
First of all, these DRC violations are known to MOSIS. Furthermore
these violations cannot be easily (safely) avoided. The particular
violation - "This layer can't abut or partially overlap between subcells"
in question will NOT cause any electrical NOR geometrical problem.
Making the contacts twice the original size (so that
the contacts are completely overlaped) will eliminate the DRC violation,
but WILL cause more serious electrical problems. This problem
will be flagged as a CIF generation error in Magic. The other group
of DRC violations has to do with P+ select layers (which are automatically
generated by Magic) getting too close to transistor channels.
There are 16 pieces of diffusion layers used as shields to block
the bloating of P+ selects. These diffusions does not have to follow
the rules.

If there are further questions, please feel free to send me e-mail
or post them on the net.


Shih-Lien Lu
for MOSIS

ARPA: sllu@mosis.edu
USEnet: ...!seismo!sllu@mosis.edu