Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!decwrl!ucbvax!jade!violet.berkeley.edu!era1987
From: era1987@violet.berkeley.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Always playin' the innocent, eh, Lou ?
Message-ID: <6156@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Thu, 3-Dec-87 01:23:12 EST
Article-I.D.: jade.6156
Posted: Thu Dec  3 01:23:12 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Dec-87 20:04:04 EST
References: <5909@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <1842@chinet.UUCP> <5944@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <6132@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <2350@homxc.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: era1987@violet.berkeley.edu (Mark Ethan Smith)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 15

In article <2350@homxc.UUCP> scott@homxc.UUCP (Scott Berry) writes:
>It's really too bad that ignoring her/him/it just doesn't do any good.
>Faced with a lack of real attacks, she/he/it will always invent imagined 
>attacks and other reasons to vent her/his/its paranoia on the net.  So 
>she/he/it will never go away.  What a shame.  I suppose, however, that 

This obviously isn't directed towards me, but I'll respond
anyway, because I doubt if David Ehlert is a paranoid who invented
the destructive attack on his SO's files.  At any rate,
Scott Berry is mucyh more of a he/she/it than David, who is
obviously a heterosexual male with a female SO, while
Scott, whatever she/he/it might be, is one of those people so out
of touch with reality that they don't even know that attacks exist.

--Mark