Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nbires!hao!noao!stsci!barsh
From: barsh@stsci.EDU (John Barshinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Lattice C 4.0 / 68000 vs. 68010 Performance
Message-ID: <116@obi-wan>
Date: Wed, 25-Nov-87 14:38:50 EST
Article-I.D.: obi-wan.116
Posted: Wed Nov 25 14:38:50 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Nov-87 09:01:09 EST
References: <111@obi-wan>
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218
Lines: 20

in article <111@obi-wan>, barsh@stsci.EDU (John Barshinger) says:
> 
> The following is my experience with the Lattice 4.0 compiler and
> utilizing the 68010 instead of the 68000 in my AMIGA...
> 

This is in response to the mail messages I have been getting
regarding the above named performance analysis:

Numbers 7 & 8 (the drystone program executions) are not
time values.  They are number of drystones executed per second
average.  The moral of the story is DRYer is indeed better...

					jrbii
					~~~~~
-- 
	        John Barshinger	
		Space Telescope Science Institute
		Baltimore, MD 21218
		plink:jrbii | bix:jrbii | barsh@stsci.edu