Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron From: ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: UCB 2.9 LISP goes illegal Message-ID: <17068@topaz.rutgers.edu> Date: 15 Dec 87 16:26:28 GMT References: <10712@brl-adm.ARPA> <1498@mhres.mh.nl> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 6 In later PDP-11 releases it was system.s, early releases had certain system calls hard coded into the assembler. Others you had to explicitly identify the call by number. This lead to the "not in assembler" annotation on certain of the Section 2 man pages. -Ron