Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron
From: ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: UCB 2.9 LISP goes illegal
Message-ID: <17068@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 87 16:26:28 GMT
References: <10712@brl-adm.ARPA> <1498@mhres.mh.nl>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 6

In later PDP-11 releases it was system.s, early releases had certain
system calls hard coded into the assembler.  Others you had to explicitly
identify the call by number.  This lead to the "not in assembler" annotation
on certain of the Section 2 man pages.

-Ron