Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!decwrl!ucbvax!jade!violet.berkeley.edu!era1987 From: era1987@violet.berkeley.edu.UUCP Newsgroups: alt.flame Subject: Re: Always playin' the innocent, eh, Lou ? Message-ID: <6156@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Thu, 3-Dec-87 01:23:12 EST Article-I.D.: jade.6156 Posted: Thu Dec 3 01:23:12 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Dec-87 20:04:04 EST References: <5909@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <1842@chinet.UUCP> <5944@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <6132@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <2350@homxc.UUCP> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: era1987@violet.berkeley.edu (Mark Ethan Smith) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 15 In article <2350@homxc.UUCP> scott@homxc.UUCP (Scott Berry) writes: >It's really too bad that ignoring her/him/it just doesn't do any good. >Faced with a lack of real attacks, she/he/it will always invent imagined >attacks and other reasons to vent her/his/its paranoia on the net. So >she/he/it will never go away. What a shame. I suppose, however, that This obviously isn't directed towards me, but I'll respond anyway, because I doubt if David Ehlert is a paranoid who invented the destructive attack on his SO's files. At any rate, Scott Berry is mucyh more of a he/she/it than David, who is obviously a heterosexual male with a female SO, while Scott, whatever she/he/it might be, is one of those people so out of touch with reality that they don't even know that attacks exist. --Mark