Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!sco!ericg From: ericg@sco.COM (Mwa ha ha) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Please Read ATARI (attn:Neil Harris).. Message-ID: <401@viscous> Date: 9 Dec 87 20:25:58 GMT References: <871121-091947-2721@Xerox> <13852@felix.UUCP> Reply-To: ericg@sco.COM (Mwa ha ha) Organization: SCO Quality Assurance Lines: 33 preston@felix.UUCP (Preston Bannister) wrote in article <13852@felix.UUCP>: ]In article <871121-091947-2721@Xerox> Brantly.henr@Xerox.COM writes: ][much deleted] ]> ]>Heck Neil, even the guys/gals with color monitors would like to video ]>tape stuff from their machines..... ] ]I second the motion. :-) ] ]I can understand Atari leaving the RF modulator off the 1040ST ](although I think the reasoning as a bit cockeyed). But, I _would_ ]like to have one on my machine. ] ]Now, I imagine that coming up with an upgrade probably wouldn't be ]profitable for Atari. Let me suggest an alternative. ] ]Neil, why don't you see if Atari could least sell us the parts we need ]to put in an RF modulator? I'm sure that some enterprising people ]will come forward and offer to do the upgrades. It would cost Atari ]nothing, build some goodwill and possibly even give Atari's dealers a ]little more business. > I know I have a rare exception, but my 1040 (purchased in October) DOES have an RF modulator, which I do not use. I'm considering holding an auction :-) -- Eric Griswold (ericg@sco.COM) "That's no baby. That's a Mr. Potatohead" I do not speak for SCO, I barely have enough room for my own opinions.