Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site watcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watcgl!gcsherwood
From: gcsherwood@watcgl.UUCP (Geoffrey C. Sherwood)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.music
Subject: Re: Rock Music Considered Harmful to Unborn Children
Message-ID: <485@watcgl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-Jun-83 08:31:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: watcgl.485
Posted: Wed Jun 15 08:31:11 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Jun-83 07:06:31 EDT
References: sdchema.591, <3235@brunix.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 24

a recent submission:
{
From: gh@brunix.UUCP (Graeme Hirst)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.music
Subject: Re: Rock Music Considered Harmful to Unborn Children
Message-ID: <3235@brunix.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 12-Jun-83 12:49:33 EDT
Date-Received: Wed, 15-Jun-83 00:54:16 EDT
References: sdchema.591
Lines: 7

This is just the basic idea of Dianetics, with a little musical criticism
added.  Hubbard, the founder of Dianetics, had a thing about all the nasty
stuff mothers do and say to their poor fetus.  For details, see Martin
Gardner's book "Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science" (Dover Books).

	Graeme Hirst, Brown University Computer Science
	{allegra, decvax, ihnp4}!brunix!gh	 gh.brown@udel-relay

}

This is a wonderful example of the logical fallacy "guilt by association."
If you want to criticize an idea, do so on its own merits, NOT by who
subscribes to it.