Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site qubix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!mit-eddi!mit-vax!eagle!harpo!decvax!decwrl!qubix!msc
From: msc@qubix.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lan
Subject: Interlan vs 3Com
Message-ID: <326@qubix.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Jun-83 11:26:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: qubix.326
Posted: Fri Jun 17 11:26:27 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jun-83 02:14:54 EDT
Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA
Lines: 15


	I am conducting a survey of the relative merits of Interlan
	vs 3Com as vendors of ethernet products.

	I am interested in comments, both good and bad, about their
	respective products, (especially their unibus and multi-bus
	controllers) their responsiveness to problems and technical
	queries and their general business conduct.

	I will summarise all responses to the net, unless specifically
	requested otherwise.
-- 
	Mark
	...{decvax,ucbvax}!decwrl!qubix!msc
	...{ittvax,amd70}!qubix!msc
	decwrl!qubix!msc@Berkeley.ARPA