Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxh!mhuxr!mhuxv!mhuxm!mhuxa!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!hou5f!hou5b!hou5c!hou5e!mat
From: mat@hou5e.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.periphs
Subject: Re: System Industries Controllers
Message-ID: <535@hou5e.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-Jun-83 10:10:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou5e.535
Posted: Fri Jun  3 10:10:28 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Jun-83 00:46:32 EDT
References: ritcv.377
Lines: 11

I was speaking with a friend last night about this stuff as we were
standing next to his 11/45 with SI disks and RK05s and he told me that
he had talked about this with someone previously at DEC.  The story is
that many of the older DEC UNIBUS devices weren't designed to the proper
tolerances, or with enough buffering, or whatever.  Note that it is
almost always the RK05s or TU10s that choke -- systems with two or more
foriegn controllers usually don't show problems with the foriegn units
but with the DEC units.

						Mark Terribile
Remember, DEC and UNIBUS are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corp.