Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site teklabs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekchips!teklabs!keithe
From: keithe@teklabs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: 'v8, sixes and torque'
Message-ID: <2078@teklabs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-Jun-83 10:30:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: teklabs.2078
Posted: Mon Jun 13 10:30:39 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 15-Jun-83 14:38:35 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 8

A recent article mentioned the superiority of a V8 in the low-end
torque department. I always thought a 6 cylinder had the better low-end
torque, but that the V8 would have a broader torque-vs-rpm curve.
Isn't that why the hi-class racing engines use 12 (smaller) cylinders
than a 6 or an 8? And isn't that why the Ford 300 cu in 6 cylinder
is a preferred truck engine over the 302 V8?

keith ericson at teklabs