Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcad!louisp From: louisp@tekcad.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Re: Radar Detectors, which to buy. - (nf) Message-ID: <439@tekcad.UUCP> Date: Fri, 27-May-83 19:47:31 EDT Article-I.D.: tekcad.439 Posted: Fri May 27 19:47:31 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 29-May-83 07:40:16 EDT Lines: 19 Relay-Version:version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mhuxt.UUCP Message-ID:<439@tekcad.UUCP> Date:Fri, 27-May-83 19:47:31 EDT #R:uw-june:-45800:tekcad:13200009:000:588 tekcad!louisp May 27 16:47:00 1983 I'll also vote for the ESCORT. The published specs of the SUPERFOX and the ESCORT are very similiar as far as sensitivity goes, I can't compare their early warning modes, The SF says it also beeps at increasing speed as you get closer. BUT one thing for sure, ONLY the ESCORT has the digital Auto-Correlation function that eliminates false warnings from cheap import detectors that radiate all over the place. There are a bunch of cheapies out there. Louis Pengue uucp: {ucbvax,decvax,chico,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!teklabs!tekcad!louisp CSnet: louisp@tek ARPAnet:louisp.tek@rand-relay