Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!tower From: tower@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.bicycle? - (nf) Message-ID: <114@inmet.UUCP> Date: Sat, 25-Jun-83 05:40:15 EDT Article-I.D.: inmet.114 Posted: Sat Jun 25 05:40:15 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jun-83 01:25:05 EDT Lines: 16 #R:turtleva:-19500:inmet:7000013:000:447 inmet!tower Jun 24 09:08:00 1983 Other reasons for net.bicyle (NOT net.rec.bicycle) are: 1) some sites already have an "illegal" net.bicycle. 2) the man documentation for notes gives a net.bicycle as an example. The reason I previously mentioned against net.rec.bicycle is that: Bicycles are much more than just recreational vehicles, just like autos (net.auto) and motorcycles (net.cycle) are. [perhaps we need a net.transport.* -just kidding]. -len tower harpo!inmet!tower