Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site packet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!packet!cfv
From: cfv@packet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.rec.disc
Message-ID: <243@packet.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-Jun-83 20:29:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: packet.243
Posted: Mon Jun 20 20:29:31 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jun-83 09:48:08 EDT
References: <1577@floyd.UUCP> <329@qubix.UUCP>
Organization: PacketCable,Inc. Cupertino, CA.
Lines: 11

Rather than go running off and create thousands of new topices, why not
use net.rec for disc until we see how much traffic there is. If we are
talking about 10-12 messages a year, why bother with the topic? Run it
as a sub topic in net.rec for a while, and lets see if it gets used enough
to make it worth having a topic of its own... (I think the same should
apply to the proposed SCA topic. It can use net.rec as well...)
-- 
>From the dungeons of the Warlock:
					      Chuck Von Rospach
					      ucbvax!amd70!packet!cfv
					      (chuqui@mit-mc)  <- obsolete!