Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site amd70.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!amd70!pn
From: pn@amd70.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.newsite
Subject: Re: new sites and news feeds
Message-ID: <2463@amd70.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Jun-83 01:24:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: amd70.2463
Posted: Wed Jun  8 01:24:04 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 7-Jun-83 23:39:57 EDT
References: <142@packet.UUCP>
Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 11

I guess it bothers me a little bit that a site I just gave a connection
to would say it can't feed anyone else (right now). I am NOT going to
take it back, it really doesn't bother me much, and I know that the
reason in this case is not selfishness but just a need to sell management,
but I am led to wonder how other sites view this situation. I think if
I were really pressed to feed a new site, was too loaded myself and
couldn't get one of my leaves to volunteer, I'd offer to feed the new
site if it would take over feeding one of my leaves. I would like to
hear comments on this approach. Is it fair?

	Phil Ngai