Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5a!hou5d!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!duke!mcnc!rti!trt
From: trt@rti.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re:  a thought about UNIX login security
Message-ID: <1116@rti.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jun-83 09:34:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: rti.1116
Posted: Thu Jun 23 09:34:30 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jun-83 01:10:52 EDT
Lines: 8

Oh yuck, 'joe' was a normal user.   My example was wrong.
(I do not have any original records, so I reconstructed
it from my own /etc/passwd, but was careless in doing it.)

Of course, there *are* systems with that kind of gaping hole.
The point of the story is the same in either case:
It is almost impossible to restrict something as general as the shell.
	Tom Truscott