Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site packet.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!packet!cfv From: cfv@packet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: There is a "Modular C" Message-ID: <269@packet.UUCP> Date: Sat, 2-Jul-83 01:03:41 EDT Article-I.D.: packet.269 Posted: Sat Jul 2 01:03:41 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 27-Jun-83 05:48:07 EDT References: uiucdcs.2222 <4887@cca.UUCP> Organization: PacketCable,Inc. Cupertino, CA. Lines: 11 I read the article in SIGPLAN on modular C. It was definitely modular. If was definitely C. If you follow the suggestions they make, it will also definitely be unreadable and unmaintainable code. It is simply another case of someone trying to force ideas onto a language that wasn't designed for them, and I thought that the implementation wasn't extremely well though out or clear. -- >From the dungeons of the Warlock: Chuck Von Rospach ucbvax!amd70!packet!cfv (chuqui@mit-mc) <- obsolete!