Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!newman From: newman@utcsrgv.UUCP (Ken Newman) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: CD.sound Message-ID: <1557@utcsrgv.UUCP> Date: Fri, 17-Jun-83 14:06:21 EDT Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.1557 Posted: Fri Jun 17 14:06:21 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jun-83 14:40:24 EDT References: <109@tesla.UUCP> Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto Lines: 7 Just as a point of interest, if you pick up most any British hi-fi rag nowadays you will probably see some article putting down cd's as obscuring fine detail compared (a-b) with their pompous Linn-Naim-Ittok etc megabuck analog setup. There seems to be a large underground consensus that cd's come out distinctly second best, for what that's worth. They especially seem to shoot holes in the available disk quality, often saying the disks are unlistenable. Any comments?