Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!tower
From: tower@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.bicycle? - (nf)
Message-ID: <114@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 25-Jun-83 05:40:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.114
Posted: Sat Jun 25 05:40:15 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jun-83 01:25:05 EDT
Lines: 16

#R:turtleva:-19500:inmet:7000013:000:447
inmet!tower    Jun 24 09:08:00 1983

Other reasons for net.bicyle (NOT net.rec.bicycle) are:

1) some sites already have an "illegal" net.bicycle.

2) the man documentation for notes gives a net.bicycle as an example.

The reason I previously mentioned against net.rec.bicycle is that:

Bicycles are much more than just recreational vehicles, just like
autos (net.auto) and motorcycles (net.cycle) are. [perhaps we
need a net.transport.* -just kidding].

-len tower harpo!inmet!tower