Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-kirk!mark From: mark@hp-kirk.UUCP Newsgroups: net.usenix Subject: Re: proposed alternate schedule - (nf) Message-ID: <1217@hp-pcd.UUCP> Date: Thu, 23-Jun-83 03:28:57 EDT Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1217 Posted: Thu Jun 23 03:28:57 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jun-83 00:24:47 EDT Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR Lines: 14 #R:idis:-21100:hp-kirk:15900002:000:662 hp-kirk!mark Jun 21 06:42:00 1983 Given the heavy demand on the technical sessions which results in considerable overbooking or restrictions on attendance, it is possible that the concurrent sessions were not seen as a problem but rather as a partial solution since this would give an opportunity of session attendance to the greatest number of people (nobody could attend two sessions). I don't know that I am in agreement with this but I would like to know if this was indeed the case. Anybody know? Is there a better way? Death Rowe hp-pcd!hp-cvd!mark Corvallis, Oregon