Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!cornell!ddw From: ddw@cornell.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Smile and say . . . Message-ID: <4588@cornell.UUCP> Date: Sun, 12-Jun-83 13:43:48 EDT Article-I.D.: cornell.4588 Posted: Sun Jun 12 13:43:48 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 13-Jun-83 12:10:55 EDT Lines: 52 Well, here we go again, hot on the heels of another non-issue. uwvax!myers makes the claim: Speaking of govt subsidies, there would be a hell of a lot more food for the rest of the world if farmers weren't paid to let their fields lie fallow (to keep the price of corn, soy beans, etc. at an acceptable level for the other farmers). I admit that there is a lot of cropland out of production this year due to the PIK (payment in kind) program. However, it is a myth that in recent years vast amounts of US farmland have been lying fallow; in fact, US agriculture has been running more or less at full steam (with the exception of some minor crops). (My source for this statment is my father, who is a professor in the Ag school here at Cornell.) Of course, it would be bad business to just grow something in those fields and have the govt buy it and ship it somewhere... Can't be having the productive give any sustenance to those less fortunate, now can we??? Well, the government \has/ been buying vast amounts of commodities for years now; remember the dairy products giveaways of recent months? The only way the PIK program could even exist is that the government has vast amounts of grain stored. The grain, of course, was bought under subsidy programs. Now, I admit that there hasn't been an overwhelming amount of this stuff shipped to other countries, but I am not at all convinced that even if it were that it would make any real difference. With the Sahara Desert con- tinuing to retreat south, terrible weather all over the world, etc., who says it would do any good at all. Particularly since a lot of the countries with the worst starvation problems have either no decent food distribution systems or corrupt officials who grab the food and pump it into the local black market. And even if you could get the food to the people who need it, what if their countries have nothing to buy it with and little prospect of ever having anything? And if the population rises when the food supply goes up (which it does), who takes care of the excess? In other words, where does it all end? I don't like the idea of people starving, but I don't know how to solve the problem, either. Pardon my cynical state of mind, but if the CMP (capitalist mode of production) is so da*n efficient, why does this kind of under-production occur? Pardon *my* cynical state of mind, but what do you suggest as an alternative? I think I'll just point out that the USSR is hardly a shining example of agricultural production and wait for the flames to arrive. David Wright {vax135|decvax|purdue}!cornell!ddw ddw@cornell