Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!ihnp4!we13!otuxa!ll1!sb1!burl!duke!unc!bch From: bch@unc.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Resurrection and the Burden of Proof Message-ID: <5290@unc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 28-May-83 02:27:30 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.5290 Posted: Sat May 28 02:27:30 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 29-May-83 08:04:56 EDT References: ihuxu.172 Lines: 10 Relay-Version:version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mhuxt.UUCP Message-ID:<5290@unc.UUCP> Date:Sat, 28-May-83 02:27:30 EDT While I don't feel qualified to speak for Tim Maroney, I think that Vickie Klick has taken an exemplar rather than the thrust of Tim's argument. The point was that the burden of proof is on the claimant, the one who claims that an event has taken place. I will prove to you that the Resurrection did not take place if you prove to me that I am not holding a grue in my left hand.