Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site qubix.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!mit-eddi!mit-vax!eagle!harpo!decvax!decwrl!qubix!msc From: msc@qubix.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lan Subject: Interlan vs 3Com Message-ID: <326@qubix.UUCP> Date: Fri, 17-Jun-83 11:26:27 EDT Article-I.D.: qubix.326 Posted: Fri Jun 17 11:26:27 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jun-83 02:14:54 EDT Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA Lines: 15 I am conducting a survey of the relative merits of Interlan vs 3Com as vendors of ethernet products. I am interested in comments, both good and bad, about their respective products, (especially their unibus and multi-bus controllers) their responsiveness to problems and technical queries and their general business conduct. I will summarise all responses to the net, unless specifically requested otherwise. -- Mark ...{decvax,ucbvax}!decwrl!qubix!msc ...{ittvax,amd70}!qubix!msc decwrl!qubix!msc@Berkeley.ARPA