Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!hou5f!orion!houca!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ixn5c!inuxc!pur-ee!CSvax:Pucc-H:Physics:piner From: CSvax:Pucc-H:Physics:piner@pur-ee.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: An example of good spelling, but bad language. Message-ID: <791@pur-phy.UUCP> Date: Wed, 22-Jun-83 00:39:36 EDT Article-I.D.: pur-phy.791 Posted: Wed Jun 22 00:39:36 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jun-83 20:13:03 EDT Lines: 29 I have seen the debate on spelling and language going on. I am currently trying to figure out the video display hardware on my new MAX-80 computer. Here is a sample of the CRT controller chip documentation from Hitachi included with the manual: "Number of horizontal displayed characters is pro- grammed to horizontal displayed register (R1) of the CRTC. Programmed value is based on screen format. Horizontal display period, which is given by specifi- cation of horizontal deflection frequency and horizontal retrace period of CRT display unit, determines horizontal character time, being divided by number of horizontal displayed characters. Moreover, as Fig. 9-10 shows the access method of refresh memory, its cycle time and access time which are necessary for CRT display system are determined by horizontal character time." There are no misspellings in this paragraph, but the meaning is not clear. If you go over it enough, move the words around, etc., you can make sense of it. Syntax is important, especially when the reader is unfamiliar with the subject. Please remember this when writting documentation. Spelling also counts, but a misspelled word in the right place, is not as confusing as a correctly spelled word in the wrong place. As a final reference, try reading "The God Damn English Language" by Mark Twain. Rich Piner Purdue Physics Dept.