Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site amd70.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!amd70!pn From: pn@amd70.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.newsite Subject: Re: new sites and news feeds Message-ID: <2463@amd70.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-Jun-83 01:24:04 EDT Article-I.D.: amd70.2463 Posted: Wed Jun 8 01:24:04 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 7-Jun-83 23:39:57 EDT References: <142@packet.UUCP> Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA Lines: 11 I guess it bothers me a little bit that a site I just gave a connection to would say it can't feed anyone else (right now). I am NOT going to take it back, it really doesn't bother me much, and I know that the reason in this case is not selfishness but just a need to sell management, but I am led to wonder how other sites view this situation. I think if I were really pressed to feed a new site, was too loaded myself and couldn't get one of my leaves to volunteer, I'd offer to feed the new site if it would take over feeding one of my leaves. I would like to hear comments on this approach. Is it fair? Phil Ngai