Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!ihnp4!we13!otuxa!ll1!sb1!burl!duke!unc!bch
From: bch@unc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Resurrection and the Burden of Proof
Message-ID: <5290@unc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 28-May-83 02:27:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.5290
Posted: Sat May 28 02:27:30 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 29-May-83 08:04:56 EDT
References: ihuxu.172
Lines: 10

Relay-Version:version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mhuxt.UUCP
Message-ID:<5290@unc.UUCP>
Date:Sat, 28-May-83 02:27:30 EDT

While I don't feel qualified to speak for Tim Maroney, I think that
Vickie Klick has taken an exemplar rather than the thrust of Tim's
argument.  The point was that the burden of proof is on the claimant,
the one who claims that an event has taken place.  I will prove to you
that the Resurrection did not take place if you prove to me that I am
not holding a grue in my left hand.