Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsstat.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsstat!laura
From: laura@utcsstat.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: swearing
Message-ID: <690@utcsstat.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Jun-83 11:09:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsstat.690
Posted: Fri Jun 17 11:09:11 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jun-83 14:24:04 EDT
References: <1625@yale-com.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada
Lines: 25

My civilised commentary on 55 went in net.auto. YOu may not have read
it yet, its the whopping big one with the expensive proposals in it.
My flames go here.

I swear, most people swear and even you may swear. It is not a "man"
thing, it is a "people" thing.
Occasionally it is more effective than a civilised article.
Occasionally it is more fun.
You said "I thought women were above swearing."

The sort of woman who is "above swearing" is generally the same brat
who demands to be equal, but then demands to be treated special because
she is a lady. She wont get very far with me.

This has nothing to do with any personal decision that you or anyone
else may have made not to swear because you dont like it.

Net.flame allows swearing. For God's sake it is about the only newgroup
where you can say what you feel without getting 42 complaints about
spelling, lets not gripe about content!

Think of it as the ultimate kitchen. If you cant stand the heat...

(you can read me in net.auto..)
laura