Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!microsof!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!floyd!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!meri From: meri@rlgvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Royal Ostracism Message-ID: <495@rlgvax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 23-May-83 12:31:33 EDT Article-I.D.: rlgvax.495 Posted: Mon May 23 12:31:33 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 29-May-83 10:11:54 EDT Lines: 27 Andy: I appreciate your mail messages and you are probably right - I should not have posted that article to the net, it should have been mailed to you personally, but... the object of my article was to point out that yours and many other mens ideas of the "perfect woman" are so idealistic that there are very few (if any) women that could live up to your premeditated expectations. Most of us would love to be the type of woman you described, but, alas, all of us have some type of imperfections. I don't have a ballerina type body, but why couldn't you offer to work with me to possibly develop one, if my other qualities were of interest to you? This is just one of many other examples of how, by working together, you could develop a lasting relationship with someone you might have otherwise overlooked. I hope I have clarified myself somewhat. I received a lot of different mail responses - everything from Right-On! to name calling. Funny thing, the only real negative response was from a female! A thousand pardons, meri RLG Corp [seismo,mcnc,we13,brl-bmd,allegra]!rlgvax!meri