Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site packet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!packet!cfv
From: cfv@packet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: There is a "Modular C"
Message-ID: <269@packet.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 2-Jul-83 01:03:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: packet.269
Posted: Sat Jul  2 01:03:41 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 27-Jun-83 05:48:07 EDT
References: uiucdcs.2222 <4887@cca.UUCP>
Organization: PacketCable,Inc. Cupertino, CA.
Lines: 11

I read the article in SIGPLAN on modular C. It was definitely modular. If
was definitely C. If you follow the suggestions they make, it will also
definitely be unreadable and unmaintainable code. It is simply another case
of someone trying to force ideas onto a language that wasn't designed for
them, and I thought that the implementation wasn't extremely well though
out or clear.
-- 
>From the dungeons of the Warlock:
					      Chuck Von Rospach
					      ucbvax!amd70!packet!cfv
					      (chuqui@mit-mc)  <- obsolete!