Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site packet.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!packet!cfv From: cfv@packet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.rec.disc Message-ID: <243@packet.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Jun-83 20:29:31 EDT Article-I.D.: packet.243 Posted: Mon Jun 20 20:29:31 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jun-83 09:48:08 EDT References: <1577@floyd.UUCP> <329@qubix.UUCP> Organization: PacketCable,Inc. Cupertino, CA. Lines: 11 Rather than go running off and create thousands of new topices, why not use net.rec for disc until we see how much traffic there is. If we are talking about 10-12 messages a year, why bother with the topic? Run it as a sub topic in net.rec for a while, and lets see if it gets used enough to make it worth having a topic of its own... (I think the same should apply to the proposed SCA topic. It can use net.rec as well...) -- >From the dungeons of the Warlock: Chuck Von Rospach ucbvax!amd70!packet!cfv (chuqui@mit-mc) <- obsolete!