Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!newman
From: newman@utcsrgv.UUCP (Ken Newman)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: CD.sound
Message-ID: <1557@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Jun-83 14:06:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.1557
Posted: Fri Jun 17 14:06:21 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jun-83 14:40:24 EDT
References: <109@tesla.UUCP>
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 7

Just as a point of interest, if you pick up most any British hi-fi rag
nowadays you will probably see some article putting down cd's as
obscuring fine detail compared (a-b) with their pompous Linn-Naim-Ittok
etc megabuck analog setup. There seems to be a large underground 
consensus that cd's come out distinctly second best, for what that's
worth. They especially seem to shoot holes in the available disk quality,
often saying the disks are unlistenable. Any comments?