Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!wivax!linus!allegra!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcad!louisp
From: louisp@tekcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Re: Radar Detectors, which to buy. - (nf)
Message-ID: <439@tekcad.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-May-83 19:47:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcad.439
Posted: Fri May 27 19:47:31 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 29-May-83 07:40:16 EDT
Lines: 19

Relay-Version:version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mhuxt.UUCP
Message-ID:<439@tekcad.UUCP>
Date:Fri, 27-May-83 19:47:31 EDT

#R:uw-june:-45800:tekcad:13200009:000:588
tekcad!louisp    May 27 16:47:00 1983

  I'll also vote for the ESCORT. The published specs of the SUPERFOX and
the ESCORT are very similiar as far as sensitivity goes, I can't compare
their early warning modes, The SF says it also beeps at increasing speed
as you get closer. BUT one thing for sure, ONLY the ESCORT has the digital
Auto-Correlation function that eliminates false warnings from cheap import
detectors that radiate all over the place. There are a bunch of cheapies out
there.
				Louis Pengue

uucp:	{ucbvax,decvax,chico,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!teklabs!tekcad!louisp
CSnet:	louisp@tek
ARPAnet:louisp.tek@rand-relay