Re: Star Trek: Nemesis [message #912] |
Fri, 04 May 2012 23:58 |
Duggy
Messages: 316 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On May 5, 1:15 am, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
> Duggy wrote:
> > On May 4, 6:49 pm, Professor Bubba wrote:
> > > It'd be much easier to blow up the local sun. That'd get rid of 'em,
> > > you betcha.
>
> > And yourself.
>
> Not in the Alderaan scenario. The Death Star had FTL capability, so it
> could outrun the explosion.
The Death Star didn't have the power to destroy a star.
===
= DUG.
===
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis [message #913 is a reply to message #912] |
Sat, 05 May 2012 04:51 |
Remysun
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On May 4, 10:58 pm, Duggy wrote:
> The Death Star didn't have the power to destroy a star.
Neither did a Star Destroyer. When marketing to the military, it's all
about the up sale.
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis [message #914 is a reply to message #912] |
Sat, 05 May 2012 06:19 |
Duggy
Messages: 316 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On May 5, 5:51 pm, Remysun wrote:
> On May 4, 10:58 pm, Duggy wrote:
>
> > The Death Star didn't have the power to destroy a star.
>
> Neither did a Star Destroyer. When marketing to the military, it's all
> about the up sale.
True, but BTR-Enterprise thought a Death Star could.
===
= DUG.
===
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis [message #915 is a reply to message #912] |
Sun, 06 May 2012 19:38 |
BTR1701
Messages: 20 Registered: May 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article
<6eaf8762-47df-429f-89db-8a9ce87debcc@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy wrote:
> On May 5, 1:15áam, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> >
> > áDuggy wrote:
> > > On May 4, 6:49ápm, Professor Bubba wrote:
> > > > It'd be much easier to blow up the local sun. áThat'd get rid of 'em,
> > > > you betcha.
> >
> > > And yourself.
> >
> > Not in the Alderaan scenario. The Death Star had FTL capability, so it
> > could outrun the explosion.
>
> The Death Star didn't have the power to destroy a star.
How do you know?
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis [message #916 is a reply to message #912] |
Sun, 06 May 2012 20:44 |
Duggy
Messages: 316 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On May 7, 8:38 am, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <6eaf8762-47df-429f-89db-8a9ce87de...@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Duggy wrote:
> > On May 5, 1:15 am, BTR1701 wrote:
> > > In article
> > > ,
>
> > > Duggy wrote:
> > > > On May 4, 6:49 pm, Professor Bubba wrote:
> > > > > It'd be much easier to blow up the local sun. That'd get rid of 'em,
> > > > > you betcha.
>
> > > > And yourself.
>
> > > Not in the Alderaan scenario. The Death Star had FTL capability, so it
> > > could outrun the explosion.
>
> > The Death Star didn't have the power to destroy a star.
>
> How do you know?
It's a flaw I couldn't get past when I designed it.
===
= DUG.
===
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|