|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244348 is a reply to message #244294] |
Tue, 06 December 2011 20:51   |
Pork Coffee
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:21:14 +0000, Ignis Fatuus
<Ignis@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 09:57:18 -0000, "Stephen Wilson"
> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ignis Fatuus" <Ignis@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>> news:uhemd79aqjittmmbs9ps6vll8pa3ropmk7@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> I have to concede that Harry Potter probably appeals to a wider
>>> audience (say four year olds to those in their hundreds) than Star
>>> Wars (8-14?); but that's because underneath the effects, SW is pretty
>>> dull stuff.
>>
>> I'd say - purely subjectively - that Star Wars is more popular amongst boys
>> (and was written by a man). Harry Potter - written by a woman - appeals to
>> more women than men.
>>
>> Not a fact, just my own observation.
>>
> If it's hard fact you're after, I've observed that Star Wars puts me
> to sleep, but (12-14 yr old) boys seem to think it's the dog's
> bollocks. On the other hand I've enjoyed all of the Potters (although
> I think the last two movies in particular were a bit pedestrian and so
> badly lit that at times I found it hard to tell what was going on). In
> fact I was pleasantly surprised by the first movies, as Columbus is
> such a hack. We have all the Potters on DVD and now Blu-Ray, and they
> get watched fairly regularly... but the secondhand SW box set was seen
> once and forgotten. I saw the first and third in the cinema, and I
> haven't bothered since.
>
> Of course, I'm hardly a cross section of the global population, but I
> don't know any adults who discuss their favourite SW movies.
You need cooler friends.
> On the
> other hand, Potter crops up fairly regularly in conversation. And of
> course, the movies were all written, produced, and directed by men;
> but I don't see that it makes much difference. Your argument on that
> score is lopsided, as it contains no factual reference, and omits
> girls altogether.
Hanky Huckleberry
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244349 is a reply to message #244280] |
Tue, 06 December 2011 21:05 |
Pork Coffee
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:33:31 -0800 (PST), Duggy
<p.allan.duggan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 8:31 am, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>> What's up with that?
>
>> Nobody has "proven me wrong".
>
> Tell me again how Harry Potter & the Deadly Hallows pt 2 (PG-13) is
> too scary for the intended audience but Revenge of the Sith (PG-13)
> isn't?
Harry Potter choked Ginny, killed a bunch of wizard kids, beat the
crap out of Ron, fell in lava and went on fire, right? Man, that
traumatized me for a week. Poor Hermione having to go into exile like
that.... such a downer ending.
>
> ===
> = DUG.
> ===
Hanky Huckleberry
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244362 is a reply to message #244361] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 06:23 |
Duggy
Messages: 316
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Dec 7, 8:43 pm, Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article
> <yourname-0612110848580...@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
> yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
>>> And words without substantiations are not facts.
>
>> Actually they can be.
>
>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>> bother wasting my time trying.
>
> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
Too many people have entered him and he's talking gibberish now.
===
= DUG.
===
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244363 is a reply to message #244362] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 06:48 |
Sandman
Messages: 97
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article
<70da2238-22ef-41e9-afde-7513d2035c86@e19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan.duggan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>
>>> Actually they can be.
>>
>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>
>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>
> Too many people have entered him and he's talking gibberish now.
So.. he's the Borg now? :)
--
Sandman[.net]
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244364 is a reply to message #244363] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 07:30 |
Duggy
Messages: 316
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Dec 7, 9:48 pm, Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article
> <70da2238-22ef-41e9-afde-7513d2035...@e19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Duggy <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > And words without substantiations are not facts.
>
>>>> Actually they can be.
>
>>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>
>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>
>> Too many people have entered him and he's talking gibberish now.
>
> So.. he's the Borg now? :)
Borg? Pah.
Picard and Data where having a contest to see how many different sets
of memories they could absorb.
===
= DUG.
===
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244367 is a reply to message #244361] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 14:49 |
YourName
Messages: 366
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <mr-7AF2BF.11434307122011@News.Individual.NET>, Sandman
<mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article
> <yourname-0612110848580001@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
>>> And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>
>> Actually they can be.
>>
>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>> bother wasting my time trying.
>
> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
is their problem - I really don't care less what anyone believes and have
got the time nor inclination to bother going around and around the smae
cirlce trying to prove or instill some common sense in people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244369 is a reply to message #244367] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 15:16 |
Sandman
Messages: 97
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article
<yourname-0812110849580001@203-118-175-227.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>
>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>
> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
> is their problem
I don't see it as a problem at all. Any claims about facts are ignored
when not accompanied with substantiation, I just felt it polite to
tell you that.
Please, continue typing words without meaning.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244370 is a reply to message #244260] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 15:41 |
AC
Messages: 8
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Your Name wrote:
> In article
> <90b2a867-736a-4907-a336-29aaa418cf13@l24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Duggy
> <Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au> wrote:
>>
>> Once upon a time "Your Name" was some who enjoyed attacking anything
>> that anyone said just to start a fight.
>>
>> Recently he seems to be throwing tantrums when anyone proves that he
>> is wrong.
>>
>> What's up with that?
>
> Nobody has "proven me wrong".
>
> I give FACTS and idiots reply with OPINIONS. But you believe whatever
> garbage you want to delude yourself with. :-\
ROFLMAO.
That is brilliant.
You claim "FACT" but use "OPINION" to prove it!!!! That is the dumbest
shit I have read on Usenet yet!!! Amazing.
Honestly, that is so incredibly stupid I have to respect it. It is genius.
Hats off.
--
AC
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244377 is a reply to message #244367] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 15:47 |
AC
Messages: 8
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Your Name wrote:
> In article<mr-7AF2BF.11434307122011@News.Individual.NET>, Sandman
> <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <yourname-0612110848580001@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>
>>>> And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>>
>>> Actually they can be.
>>>
>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>
>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>
> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
> is their problem - I really don't care less what anyone believes and have
> got the time nor inclination to bother going around and around the smae
> cirlce trying to prove or instill some common sense in people.
No you don't. You lie and make things up.
If I were you I'd get some professional help.
--
AC
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244378 is a reply to message #244369] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 15:48 |
AC
Messages: 8
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article
> <yourname-0812110849580001@203-118-175-227.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
>>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>>
>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>
>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>> is their problem
>
> I don't see it as a problem at all. Any claims about facts are ignored
> when not accompanied with substantiation, I just felt it polite to
> tell you that.
>
> Please, continue typing words without meaning.
>
>
They do have meaning. They define what he/she is.
Granted not the meaning it wants to convey, but its more than enough for
the casual observer to build a reasonable picture of it.
--
AC
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244379 is a reply to message #244330] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 15:50 |
AC
Messages: 8
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Your Name wrote:
> In article<bdGdnV9gdZk5OUDTnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Hornplayer9599"<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>> Your Name wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a
>>> LONG LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever
>>> garbage fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so
>>> I no longer bother wasting my time trying. I simply give the facts
>>> ... whether you fools want to believe them or not is your problem, I
>>> really couldn't care less.
>>
>> In other words....you *can't* prove it, so you are going to try to
>> deflect attention away from that by insulting others. OK, got it.
>
> Whatever utter garbage you want to delude yourself with. :-\
Not yours, which is why you are so frustrated. Still, you are getting
all this attention, so its not a complete loss to you.
--
AC
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244380 is a reply to message #244258] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 17:09 |
doctor
Messages: 57
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article <mr-181CF7.21163707122011@News.Individual.NET>,
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article
> <yourname-0812110849580001@203-118-175-227.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
>>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>>
>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>
>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>> is their problem
>
> I don't see it as a problem at all. Any claims about facts are ignored
> when not accompanied with substantiation, I just felt it polite to
> tell you that.
>
> Please, continue typing words without meaning.
>
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
edm.general are full of the above mentioned people.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Merry Christmas 2011 and Happy New Year 2012 !
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244381 is a reply to message #244258] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 17:10 |
doctor
Messages: 57
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article <phQDq.135201$4a.47754@newsfe04.ams2>, AC <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>> In article<mr-7AF2BF.11434307122011@News.Individual.NET>, Sandman
>> <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <yourname-0612110848580001@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>>
>>>> > And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>>>
>>>> Actually they can be.
>>>>
>>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>>
>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>
>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>> is their problem - I really don't care less what anyone believes and have
>> got the time nor inclination to bother going around and around the smae
>> cirlce trying to prove or instill some common sense in people.
>
> No you don't. You lie and make things up.
>
> If I were you I'd get some professional help.
>
> --
> AC
Join edm.general .
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Merry Christmas 2011 and Happy New Year 2012 !
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244382 is a reply to message #244367] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 18:52 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Hornplayer9599
Your Name wrote:
> In article <mr-7AF2BF.11434307122011@News.Individual.NET>, Sandman
> <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <yourname-0612110848580001@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>
>>>> And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>>
>>> Actually they can be.
>>>
>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised
>>> a LONG LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe
>>> whatever garbage fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I
>>> prove it, so I no longer bother wasting my time trying.
>>
>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>
> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it
> or not is their problem - I really don't care less what anyone
> believes and have got the time nor inclination to bother going around
> and around the smae cirlce trying to prove or instill some common
> sense in people.
When you start talking facts & common sense, we will let you know.
Until then, by all means continue, you are very entertaining.
--
What's considered psychotic behavior anywhere else is company policy
here.
--The Management
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244383 is a reply to message #244376] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 18:56 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Hornplayer9599
AC wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>> In article
>> <76e26e5e-42c3-48e8-98aa-b591e6f8c4c4@ca1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
>> Duggy
>> <p.allan.duggan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2:38=A0pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>>> FACT: the franchises were aimed at different aged audiences.
>>>> Star Wars is slightly older than Harry Potter.
>>>
>>> FACT: JK Rowling said she aimed the books are a market as it
>>> aged.
>>>
>>> Your fact contains a false claim.
>>
>> Whatever garbage you want to delude yoursefl with. :-\
>
> Not so cool with facts now?
>
> That is exactly what she did, and that the whole selling point of the
> series.
>
> You really are the cutting edge of rank stupid.
Oh, he's cool with facts, AC.....as long as they are /his/ facts. If
what everyone else says doesn't agree with him, it is either deluded
garbage, or deluded opinions.
--
What's considered psychotic behavior anywhere else is company policy
here.
--The Management
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244384 is a reply to message #244377] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 19:09 |
YourName
Messages: 366
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <phQDq.135201$4a.47754@newsfe04.ams2>, AC <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>> In article<mr-7AF2BF.11434307122011@News.Individual.NET>, Sandman
>> <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <yourname-0612110848580001@203-118-175-68.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>>
>>>> > And words without substantiations are not facts.
>>>>
>>>> Actually they can be.
>>>>
>>>> It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
>>>> LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
>>>> bother wasting my time trying.
>>>
>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>
>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>> is their problem - I really don't care less what anyone believes and have
>> got the time nor inclination to bother going around and around the smae
>> cirlce trying to prove or instill some common sense in people.
>
> No you don't. You lie and make things up.
>
> If I were you I'd get some professional help.
Fine - the infestation of morons win ... I completely give up wasting any
of my time at all, believe whatever garbage you idiots want to delude
yourselves with, but it's absolutely zero surprise that the planet is
going down the toilet with so many greedy, selfish morons running around
unable to understand simple common sense, common deceny and intelligence.
:-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244399 is a reply to message #244384] |
Wed, 07 December 2011 21:14 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Hornplayer9599
Your Name wrote:
>
> Fine - the infestation of morons win
I didn't know that one moron--you--constituted an infestation.
>believe whatever garbage you idiots want to delude yourselves with
You are doing enough of that for the entire planet.
What a shame you've decided to return to the nursury....you were just
stating to go from entertaining to hilarious.
--
What's considered psychotic behavior anywhere else is company policy
here.
--The Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244402 is a reply to message #244380] |
Thu, 08 December 2011 04:37 |
Sandman
Messages: 97
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article <jboo7b$s0$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <mr-181CF7.21163707122011@News.Individual.NET>,
> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>> In article
>> <yourname-0812110849580001@203-118-175-227.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>
>>>> > It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a
>>>> > LONG
>>>> > LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> > fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no
>>>> > longer
>>>> > bother wasting my time trying.
>>>>
>>>> Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>>> Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>>
>>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>>> is their problem
>>
>> I don't see it as a problem at all. Any claims about facts are ignored
>> when not accompanied with substantiation, I just felt it polite to
>> tell you that.
>>
>> Please, continue typing words without meaning.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sandman[.net]
>
> edm.general are full of the above mentioned people.
I don't post to edm.general though, I was crossposted there from
rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc :)
--
Sandman[.net]
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244403 is a reply to message #244384] |
Thu, 08 December 2011 04:57 |
Sandman
Messages: 97
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article
<yourname-0812111309490001@203-118-175-8.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>> If I were you I'd get some professional help.
>
> Fine - the infestation of morons win ... I completely give up wasting any
> of my time at all, believe whatever garbage you idiots want to delude
> yourselves with
Huh, it seems here as if your contribution here was meant to NOT make
these "idiots" believe what they want, which is in stark contrast to
the lack of actual substantiations for the supposed facts you claim to
have provided.
It doesn't really work both ways. Either you DON'T care what others
believe and don't provide support for your claims, or you DO care and
are thus forced to substantiate your claims. Obviously the path of
least resistance is to not care, at which point a reasonable person
would abandon the discussion altogether as to not conflict with the
entire "caring" part.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
|
|
|
| Re: Have too many people entered "Your Name" here? [message #244405 is a reply to message #244402] |
Thu, 08 December 2011 07:37 |
doctor
Messages: 57
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
In article <mr-0E9782.10373108122011@News.Individual.NET>,
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <jboo7b$s0$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>> In article <mr-181CF7.21163707122011@News.Individual.NET>,
>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <yourname-0812110849580001@203-118-175-227.nzwide.ihug.co.nz>,
>>> yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
>>>
>>>> > > It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a
>>>> > > LONG
>>>> > > LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
>>>> > > fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no
>>>> > > longer
>>>> > > bother wasting my time trying.
>>>> >
>>>> > Which means that we who are not "morons" won't believe you either.
>>>> > Don't do it for the "morons", do it for yourself.
>>>>
>>>> As I said, I simply give the facts, whether anyone else believes it or not
>>>> is their problem
>>>
>>> I don't see it as a problem at all. Any claims about facts are ignored
>>> when not accompanied with substantiation, I just felt it polite to
>>> tell you that.
>>>
>>> Please, continue typing words without meaning.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sandman[.net]
>>
>> edm.general are full of the above mentioned people.
>
> I don't post to edm.general though, I was crossposted there from
> rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc :)
>
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
Well vitriol is found in edm.general
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Merry Christmas 2011 and Happy New Year 2012 !
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
