Home »
Sci-Fi/Fantasy »
Battlestar Galactica »
Re: NASA and SF
| Re: NASA and SF [message #412907] |
Tue, 07 November 2006 15:57 |
|
|
Originally posted by: CatPanDaddy
"Wayland" <terminalwriter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cqahk2hbop9u3bcu0vbm10o8vnfu4e9qme@4ax.com...
>
>
> On Sep 25 1999, 2:00 am, "nanorc" <huh@mindspring.com.invalid> wrote:
>> Jordan S. Bassior <jsbass...@aol.com> wrote
>>
>>>> And the space shuttle won't have much to do with it, being a rather
>>>> expensive boondoggle. We've already explored low earth orbit.
>>
>>> I agree that the Shuttle Orbiter is obsolescent. What system or systems do
>>> you
>>> see replacing it for manned orbital spaceflight?
>>
>> Why replace something you don't need?
>
> Seven years later, the same discussion is still going on.
>
>
> Wayland
> ...the more things change...
....plus c'est la meme chose.
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 16:16:50 EDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11086 seconds
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
