Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.roots » Re: Geneology Sources should *not* be posted to net.roots
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Geneology Sources should *not* be posted to net.roots [message #132922] Thu, 05 December 1985 06:33
gnu is currently offline  gnu
Messages: 91
Registered: March 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Article-I.D.: l5.315
Posted: Thu Dec  5 06:33:01 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Dec-85 15:49:59 EST
References: <412@whuts.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 19

Sources should go in net.sources or mod.sources.

If you think people in net.roots would be interested in your
source, post a little note saying "Look in net.sources to get this
great program".  You can even make your note a followup to your
source posting (change the Newsgroups: line and maybe subject),
so people can just follow the References: line up to the source
article (in vnews, the "p" for parent command).

There are a few reasons for this:

 * Lots of sites automatically archive net.sources, so if you post in
net.roots, they won't keep a copy of your source.

 * Lots of sites don't receive net.sources *deliberately* because
they want to keep their phone bills down.

Need I say more?  If so, try reading net.announce.newusers.  The
protocol for posting sources is in there.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Poland
Next Topic: Introduction
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 10:54:40 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01343 seconds