| The women of TOS [message #108447] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:21  |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This page was born because of my righteous anger at Trek "fans" who
repeatedly talk about "Playboy Kirk" or the Star Trek "Babes" in an
appallingly sexist way. Here's proof that Kirk was NOT a playboy and
Star Trek was NOT a sexist show. It was an anti-sexist show: one of the
first, and one of the all-time best.
From now on, when anyone rolls into the Trek fan forum, spits their gum
out onto the floor, and oafishly declares that Kirk was a heterosexual
horndog who porked all of the chicks, I want you all to boldly and
confidently SCOFF at them. Scoff also if they say that all the TOS women
were bimbos in miniskirts who were nothing but eye-candy. The only
proper reaction to such ill-informed opinions is round, sound
scoffery... as I herein demonstrate:
http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
If we are going to argue, let's argue about facts, not fantasies nor
falsehoods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108449 is a reply to message #108448] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:27  |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/3/2013 9:25 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
> On 9/3/2013 9:21 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>
>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>
> FACT: Kirk did not pork all nor even most of the chicks. Most of the
> chicks were beyond his reach, and most of the rest of them he never
> reached for! FACT.
>
FACT 1: Kirk never porked his "great love" Edith Keeler.
FACT 2: Kirk only porked Mirimanee when he was a) afflicted by amnesia
and b) properly married to her.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108450 is a reply to message #108449] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:29 |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/3/2013 9:27 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
> On 9/3/2013 9:25 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>> On 9/3/2013 9:21 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>
>>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>>
>> FACT: Kirk did not pork all nor even most of the chicks. Most of the
>> chicks were beyond his reach, and most of the rest of them he never
>> reached for! FACT.
>>
>
> FACT 1: Kirk never porked his "great love" Edith Keeler.
>
> FACT 2: Kirk only porked Mirimanee when he was a) afflicted by amnesia
> and b) properly married to her.
FACT: Kirk apparently porked Deela only because she threatened his
life. He was under duress!
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108451 is a reply to message #108450] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:31 |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
If Kirk fucked every single woman who was on the show, so what? He was
presented as single and free. BUT the truth is that he pushed women
away more often than he embraced them. They were hot for him way more
than he was hot for them.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108452 is a reply to message #108451] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:34 |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/3/2013 9:31 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
> If Kirk fucked every single woman who was on the show, so what? He was
> presented as single and free. BUT the truth is that he pushed women
> away more often than he embraced them. They were hot for him way more
> than he was hot for them.
The truth is, that if Kirk made a play for a gal, more often than not is
was mission-related. He's a male Mata-Hari, using his sex appeal to
manipulate women. NOT to get laid, but to get something else from them.
|
|
|
|
| Playboy Kirk is a myth Re: The women of TOS [message #108453 is a reply to message #108452] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 09:40 |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/3/2013 9:34 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
> The truth is, that if Kirk made a play for a gal, more often than not is
> was mission-related. He's a male Mata-Hari, using his sex appeal to
> manipulate women. NOT to get laid, but to get something else from them.
If Star Trek was the Kirk-gets-laid-by-one-exotic-chick-each-show show,
then prove it. But you can't, because it wasn't that. That was in your
imagination, not in the show.
You say Kirk/Spock is in my imagination. I say Kirk-fucking-everything
is in your imagination. I have more evidence than you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108566 is a reply to message #108447] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 17:57 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04np3$t9k$1@dont-
email.me:
> This page was born because of my righteous anger at Trek "fans" who
> repeatedly talk about "Playboy Kirk" or the Star Trek "Babes" in an
> appallingly sexist way. Here's proof that Kirk was NOT a playboy and
> Star Trek was NOT a sexist show. It was an anti-sexist show: one of
the
> first, and one of the all-time best.
Fanboy alert!
>
> From now on, when anyone rolls into the Trek fan forum, spits their
gum
> out onto the floor, and oafishly declares that Kirk was a heterosexual
> horndog who porked all of the chicks, I want you all to boldly and
> confidently SCOFF at them. Scoff also if they say that all the TOS
women
> were bimbos in miniskirts who were nothing but eye-candy.
Whoever said that? Let's deal with REAL facts.
> The only
> proper reaction to such ill-informed opinions is round, sound
> scoffery... as I herein demonstrate:
>
> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>
> If we are going to argue, let's argue about facts, not fantasies nor
> falsehoods.
LOL
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108567 is a reply to message #108449] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 18:00 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04o3k$tib$2@dont-
email.me:
> On 9/3/2013 9:25 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>> On 9/3/2013 9:21 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>
>>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>>
>> FACT: Kirk did not pork all nor even most of the chicks. Most of
the
>> chicks were beyond his reach, and most of the rest of them he never
>> reached for! FACT.
>>
>
> FACT 1: Kirk never porked his "great love" Edith Keeler.
>
A. How do you know?
B. What difference does it make either way?
> FACT 2: Kirk only porked Mirimanee when he was a) afflicted by
amnesia
> and b) properly married to her.
>
The fact that he had amnesia makes it irrelevant to Kirk's character or
sexual preference.
The fact you continue to use the word PORK makes it even harder to take
anything that you say seriously.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108568 is a reply to message #108450] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 18:01 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04o7p$tib$3@dont-
email.me:
> On 9/3/2013 9:27 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>> On 9/3/2013 9:25 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>> On 9/3/2013 9:21 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>>>
>>> FACT: Kirk did not pork all nor even most of the chicks. Most of
the
>>> chicks were beyond his reach, and most of the rest of them he never
>>> reached for! FACT.
>>>
>>
>> FACT 1: Kirk never porked his "great love" Edith Keeler.
>>
>> FACT 2: Kirk only porked Mirimanee when he was a) afflicted by
amnesia
>> and b) properly married to her.
>
> FACT: Kirk apparently porked Deela only because she threatened his
> life. He was under duress!
>
Again, so? That was a specific case, not a general indication of Kirk's
character or sexual preference. Are these all the so-called facts you
have?
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108569 is a reply to message #108451] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 18:02 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04oc8$tib$4@dont-
email.me:
> If Kirk fucked every single woman who was on the show, so what? He was
> presented as single and free. BUT the truth is that he pushed women
> away more often than he embraced them. They were hot for him way more
> than he was hot for them.
>
All you see are individual occurences based on the plots written by
different writers. Good thing you're not a lawyer, you would never make it
through your first case.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #108570 is a reply to message #108452] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 18:05 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04oh4$tib$5@dont-
email.me:
> On 9/3/2013 9:31 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>> If Kirk fucked every single woman who was on the show, so what? He
was
>> presented as single and free. BUT the truth is that he pushed women
>> away more often than he embraced them. They were hot for him way
more
>> than he was hot for them.
>
> The truth is, that if Kirk made a play for a gal, more often than not
is
> was mission-related. He's a male Mata-Hari, using his sex appeal to
> manipulate women. NOT to get laid, but to get something else from
them.
>
All you see are the mission-related cases. There are no non-mission
episodes. Then you try to connect two unrelated scenarios and infer
some half-assed conclusion.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Playboy Kirk is a myth Re: The women of TOS [message #108571 is a reply to message #108453] |
Tue, 03 September 2013 18:07 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04osp$3mn$1@dont-
email.me:
> On 9/3/2013 9:34 AM, ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> The truth is, that if Kirk made a play for a gal, more often than not
is
>> was mission-related. He's a male Mata-Hari, using his sex appeal to
>> manipulate women. NOT to get laid, but to get something else from
them.
>
> If Star Trek was the Kirk-gets-laid-by-one-exotic-chick-each-show
show,
> then prove it. But you can't, because it wasn't that. That was in
your
> imagination, not in the show.
>
> You say Kirk/Spock is in my imagination. I say Kirk-fucking-
everything
> is in your imagination. I have more evidence than you do.
>
>
All you see are 50 minutes in each mission. You don't see Kirk take a
crap either. Does that mean he doesn't. If they only ate as often as
you see on screen, they would all starve.
You have NO evidence. Of anything. Only your own delusions.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The women of TOS [message #109574 is a reply to message #108566] |
Fri, 06 September 2013 22:11 |
nextgenfm
Messages: 2
Registered: September 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On 9/3/2013 5:57 PM, Wiseguy wrote:
> ToolPackinMama <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote in news:l04np3$t9k$1@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> This page was born because of my righteous anger at Trek "fans" who
>> repeatedly talk about "Playboy Kirk" or the Star Trek "Babes" in an
>> appallingly sexist way. Here's proof that Kirk was NOT a playboy and
>> Star Trek was NOT a sexist show. It was an anti-sexist show: one of
> the
>> first, and one of the all-time best.
>
> Fanboy alert!
>
>>
>> From now on, when anyone rolls into the Trek fan forum, spits their
> gum
>> out onto the floor, and oafishly declares that Kirk was a heterosexual
>> horndog who porked all of the chicks, I want you all to boldly and
>> confidently SCOFF at them. Scoff also if they say that all the TOS
> women
>> were bimbos in miniskirts who were nothing but eye-candy.
>
> Whoever said that? Let's deal with REAL facts.
>
>> The only
>> proper reaction to such ill-informed opinions is round, sound
>> scoffery... as I herein demonstrate:
>>
>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
>>
>> If we are going to argue, let's argue about facts, not fantasies nor
>> falsehoods.
>
> LOL
>
I just joined this is hilarious
-RadioGenius
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
