{"id":30841,"date":"2023-03-21T09:14:07","date_gmt":"2023-03-21T13:14:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/?p=30841"},"modified":"2023-03-21T09:14:35","modified_gmt":"2023-03-21T13:14:35","slug":"a-warning-to-americans-from-across-the-pond-dont-take-your-free-speech-rights-for-granted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/2023\/03\/21\/a-warning-to-americans-from-across-the-pond-dont-take-your-free-speech-rights-for-granted\/","title":{"rendered":"A Warning to Americans From Across the Pond: Don\u2019t Take Your Free Speech Rights for Granted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"\/wordpress\/?attachment_id=30842\" class=\"attachment wp-att-30842\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk-1024x592.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"802\" height=\"464\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-30842\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk-1024x592.png 1024w, http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk-300x174.png 300w, http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk-768x444.png 768w, http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk-207x120.png 207w, http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/free-speech_uk.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 802px) 100vw, 802px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>For the past decade, freedom of speech has been at the forefront of America&#8217;s culture war, and it should not be controversial to say that both sides are at least partly to blame for this.<\/p>\n<p>Many on the left have exploited their expanding cultural hegemony to suppress dissenting speech in universities, religious institutions, and the creative industries, while some on the right have attempted to suppress \u201cobscenity,\u201d punish the speech of their ideological enemies, and micromanage classroom instruction.<\/p>\n<p>To those on all sides who think of America\u2019s proud free speech tradition as a political football, I have a simple message: heed Britain\u2019s example.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, a woman was arrested in the UK for refusing to cooperate with a Police investigation into her activities near an abortion clinic. What stimulated this investigation? Was she blocking access to the clinic? Harassing women seeking an abortion? No, she was silently praying.<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/adf.uk\/support-isabel\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">The arrest of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce<\/a><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"> <\/span>is just the latest in a tapestry of alarming censorship exhibits. Since the passage of the Communications Act in 2003, it has become the norm to see reports of people being<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spiked-online.com\/2022\/11\/03\/now-private-messages-can-land-you-in-prison\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spiked-online.com\/2022\/11\/03\/now-private-messages-can-land-you-in-prison\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">jailed for \u2018offensive\u2019 private text messages<\/a>; during the mourning period for Queen Elizabeth, several peaceful anti-monarchy protesters were<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk\/advice_information\/explainer-anti-monarchy-protests\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk\/advice_information\/explainer-anti-monarchy-protests\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">detained or arrested<\/a>; and in a<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/christianconcern.com\/news\/government-admits-it-was-inappropriate-for-cps-to-call-bible-offensive\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/christianconcern.com\/news\/government-admits-it-was-inappropriate-for-cps-to-call-bible-offensive\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">recent statement<\/a>, the Crown Prosecution Service argued sections of The Bible \u201care simply no longer appropriate in modern society and \u2026 would be deemed offensive if stated in public.\u201d<\/p>\n<div style=\"display: flex; max-width: 550px; width: 100%; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;\"><iframe id=\"twitter-widget-0\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" allowtransparency=\"true\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" class=\"\" style=\"position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 672px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;\" title=\"Twitter Tweet\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=feeonline&amp;dnt=false&amp;embedId=twitter-widget-0&amp;features=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%3D&amp;frame=false&amp;hideCard=false&amp;hideThread=false&amp;id=1605966793314422786&amp;lang=en&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Ffee.org%2Farticles%2Fa-warning-to-americans-from-across-the-pond-don-t-take-your-free-speech-rights-for-granted%2F&amp;sessionId=aac1a861fff99c1fcd1dc744d9fb9fe8b5bf1622&amp;siteScreenName=feeonline&amp;theme=light&amp;widgetsVersion=aaf4084522e3a%3A1674595607486&amp;width=550px\" data-tweet-id=\"1605966793314422786\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div>\n<p>The reaction of Britain\u2019s governing elite has not been to correct this sorry state of affairs, but to double down on Parliamentary efforts to curb free expression. New legislation called <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/6241372\/uk-public-order-bill-climate-protests\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">The Public Order Bill<\/a>, if passed, will have a chilling effect on our right to protest; the government\u2019s proposed Online Safety Bill would fatally undermine encryption, while forcing tech companies to<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spectator.co.uk\/article\/the-online-harms-bill-still-threatens-free-speech-and-privacy\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spectator.co.uk\/article\/the-online-harms-bill-still-threatens-free-speech-and-privacy\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">censor speech \u201con an industrial scale\u201d<\/a>; and some MPs have recently taken it upon themselves to sign<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mirror.co.uk\/news\/politics\/sixty-mps-demand-action-against-28776933\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mirror.co.uk\/news\/politics\/sixty-mps-demand-action-against-28776933\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">a letter condemning<\/a> an offensive op-ed about Meghan Markle.<\/p>\n<p>Thankfully, the American Constitution is clear that decisions about the content of speech are not in the purview of legislators, but individuals. Although post-New Deal Supreme Court jurisprudence leaves much to be desired, it is to the judiciary\u2019s credit that it has generally upheld First Amendment provisions stringently.<\/p>\n<p>While a strong system of constitutional protections is a vital prerequisite to upholding individual freedom, it is not a silver bullet. The key threat to free speech in the UK comes from voters\u2019 unwillingness to defend the right at the ballot box.<\/p>\n<p>On free speech, most Brits are split into two groups. The first takes a Helen Lovejoy-esque approach to speech, with \u201cWon\u2019t somebody think of the children?\u201d <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/home-news\/self-harm-content-illegal-molly-russell-b2233627.html\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">being an essential rallying cry<\/a> for their campaign to encourage more online censorship. This group tends to endorse the view that<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/yougov.co.uk\/topics\/society\/survey-results\/daily\/2017\/08\/02\/02088\/2\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/yougov.co.uk\/topics\/society\/survey-results\/daily\/2017\/08\/02\/02088\/2\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">causing offence or panic trumps the right to free expression<\/a>, which in turn underpins their desire for other restrictions like anti-hate speech and anti-misinformation laws.<\/p>\n<p>The second group\u2019s approach is akin to appeasement, condemning the latest encroachment on free speech (particularly when it affects them or their in-group) and proclaiming censorship should not go one step further. They rarely, however, make the principled case for free speech or advocate the repeal of all speech-suppressing laws.<\/p>\n<div style=\"clear:both;\">\n<div id=\"om-fqmeg7lcejd7fy5oro5r-holder\">\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp-holder\">\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The first group is an active threat to free speech, while the second lacks the ideological commitment to fight back against the tide of censorship engulfing British law.<\/p>\n<p>The task ahead for those of us trying to restore free speech is titanic: first, we have to engineer a colossal change in the culture around free speech, such that voters will no longer tolerate infringements on their freedom by MPs. If we can accomplish this, we must then repeal a gargantuan body of speech-suppressing legislation. Only then would it be possible to implement institutional protections akin to the First Amendment, which would shield freedom of expression from future Parliamentary interference.<\/p>\n<p>Those willing to take on this task look to America as the shining city on the hill\u2014a haven of free expression in a world becoming increasingly hostile to it. So much of the work we must do in the UK is already done in the US: you have a proud revolutionary heritage which promotes individual expression, characters who stand proudly as individuals against the mob are<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/fee.org\/resources\/individualism-a-deeply-american-philosophy\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\" data-toggle=\"popover\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/fee.org\/resources\/individualism-a-deeply-american-philosophy\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\" data-toggle=\"popover\">core to so much of your history and mythology<\/a>, and your constitutional guarantee of free speech has largely withstood the challenges thrown its way.<\/p>\n<p>This has not, however, always been true. During World War I, Americans were whipped into a patriotic fervor which saw dissent as a vice, not a virtue. As expected, Congress was not immune to that fervor, passing the Espionage Act of 1917, which restricted anti-war speech. Tragically, the Supreme Court also refused to stop liberties being undermined, upholding Congressional censorship in cases like<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1900-1940\/249us211\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1900-1940\/249us211\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">Debs v. United States<\/a><em>\u2014<\/em>which approved the imprisonment of socialist presidential candidate Eugene Debs for speaking against the war\u2014and<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1900-1940\/249us47\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> <\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1900-1940\/249us47\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">Schenck v. United States<\/a><em>\u2014<\/em>which upheld the criminalization of speech urging people to ignore the draft and originated the misguided idea that falsely shouting \u2018Fire!\u2019 in a crowded theater is not legally protected speech.<\/p>\n<p>As America\u2019s past and Britain\u2019s present show, you cannot always rely on precedent and institutions to protect free speech. In 1944, Judge Learned Hand delivered a speech titled<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.btboces.org\/Downloads\/1_The%20Spirit%20of%20Liberty%20by%20Learned%20Hand.pdf\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"> \u201c<\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.btboces.org\/Downloads\/1_The%20Spirit%20of%20Liberty%20by%20Learned%20Hand.pdf\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\">The Spirit of Liberty<\/a>.\u201d While I believe the vision of liberty he articulated in the speech was flawed, he delivered an important insight when he said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cLiberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it. While it lies there, it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it.\u201d<\/em><\/blockquote>\n<p>The future of free speech lies in the heart of every American, in every university lecture theater, in every protest, in every vote, in every speech, and in every debate. Nurture it and selfishly guard it, because if politicians sense that your willingness to protect it has diminished, everything from your right to speak out against government policy to your right to silently pray outside an abortion clinic may, before you even realize it, be eroded.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom of speech is functionally extinct in Britain. I urge all Americans to learn the lessons from our experience.<\/p>\n<p><script src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" defer=\"\" async=\"\"><\/script>\n<div>\n<h5>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/fee.org\/people\/harrison-griffiths\/\" class=\"keychainify-checked steem-keychain-checked\"><br \/>\nHarrison Griffiths<br \/>\n<\/a><\/h5>\n<p class=\"brief-bio\">\n<p>Harrison Griffiths is Communications Officer at the Institute of Economic Affairs, a free-market think tank in London.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/fee.org\/articles\/a-warning-to-americans-from-across-the-pond-don-t-take-your-free-speech-rights-for-granted\/\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For the past decade, freedom of speech has been at the forefront of America&#8217;s culture war, and it should not be controversial to say that both sides are at least partly to blame for this. Many on the left have exploited their expanding cultural hegemony to suppress dissenting speech in universities, religious institutions, and the creative industries, while some on the right have attempted to suppress \u201cobscenity,\u201d punish the speech of their ideological enemies, and micromanage classroom instruction. To those on all sides who think of America\u2019s proud free speech tradition as a political football, I have a simple message: heed Britain\u2019s example. Last month, a woman was arrested in the UK for refusing to cooperate with a Police investigation into her activities near an abortion clinic. What stimulated this investigation? Was she blocking access to the clinic? Harassing women seeking an abortion? No, she was silently praying. The arrest of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce is just the latest in a tapestry of alarming censorship exhibits. Since the passage of the Communications Act in 2003, it has become the norm to see reports of people being jailed for \u2018offensive\u2019 private text messages; during the mourning period for Queen Elizabeth, several peaceful anti-monarchy [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30842,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[82,737],"class_list":["post-30841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-politics","tag-1st-amendment","tag-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30841"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30841\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30844,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30841\/revisions\/30844"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30842"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}