{"id":11173,"date":"2015-09-29T10:47:46","date_gmt":"2015-09-29T14:47:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/?p=11173"},"modified":"2015-09-29T10:47:46","modified_gmt":"2015-09-29T14:47:46","slug":"n-j-supreme-court-expands-police-authority-for-warrantless-car-searches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/2015\/09\/29\/n-j-supreme-court-expands-police-authority-for-warrantless-car-searches\/","title":{"rendered":"N.J. Supreme Court expands police authority for warrantless car searches"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nj.com\/politics\/index.ssf\/2015\/09\/nj_supreme_court_expands_police_discretion_in_warr.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/18824951-mmmain1.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The state Supreme Court on Thursday overturned its own 2009 decision on warrantless car searches, broadening police authority to search vehicles based on probable cause.<\/p>\n<p>The 5-2 decision, stemming from the case of a Salem County man who was charged with illegal handgun possession following an unrelated motor vehicle stop, was praised by the state Attorney General as a fix that helps law enforcement.<\/p>\n<p>Civil rights advocates, however, decried it as a rollback of civil liberties in the state.<\/p>\n<p>William L. Witt was pulled over on Route 48 in Carneys Point in December 2012 after he approached a police officer with his high beams on and &#8220;failed to dim&#8221; as he passed. After speaking with Witt, the officer concluded he was intoxicated, performed a field sobriety test and placed him under arrest.<\/p>\n<p>While searching the car for evidence of open container alcohol consumption, the officer found a handgun in the center console.<\/p>\n<p>Witt sought at trial to suppress the gun on the ground that police performed an unreasonable search in violation of the the state constitution, and a state appeals court panel found in May of last year the officer did not meet the &#8220;exigent circumstances&#8221; standard for warrantless searches spelled out in a 2009 decision by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>That decision, known as State v. Pena-Flores, found police must obtain a warrant to search a vehicle unless they have both probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence and can demonstrate &#8220;exigent circumstances&#8221; such as time constraints or safety concerns that would justify performing a warrantless search.<\/p>\n<p>The state Attorney General&#8217;s Office had argued the Pena-Flores decision was &#8220;unworkable&#8221; because of the difficulty of obtaining warrants on the fly and had led to &#8220;unintended negative consequences.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Justice Barry T. Albin, writing the majority decision, found the standard applied in the 2009 decision &#8220;does not provide greater liberty or security to New Jersey&#8217;s citizens and has placed on law enforcement unrealistic and impracticable burdens.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The court also found the 2009 standard had the unintended consequence of causing an &#8220;exponential increase in police-induced consent automobile searches,&#8221; suggesting that police officers may be pressuring motorists to volunteer for searches rather than take time to obtain a warrant.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The heavy reliance on consent searches is of great concern given the historical abuses associated with such searches and the potential for future abuses,&#8221; Albin wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Federal law allows for warrantless vehicle searches based on probable cause, and New Jersey&#8217;s two-pronged standard has long been considered added protection for motorists.<\/p>\n<p>Writing the dissent, Justice Jaynee LaVecchia called the decision &#8220;a retreat to the federal standard for warrantless searches of an automobile.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Source: <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nj.com\/politics\/index.ssf\/2015\/09\/nj_supreme_court_expands_police_discretion_in_warr.html\">N.J. Supreme Court expands police authority for warrantless car searches | NJ.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The state Supreme Court on Thursday overturned its own 2009 decision on warrantless car searches, broadening police authority to search vehicles based on probable cause. The 5-2 decision, stemming from the case of a Salem County man who was charged with illegal handgun possession following an unrelated motor vehicle stop, was praised by the state Attorney General as a fix that helps law enforcement. Civil rights advocates, however, decried it as a rollback of civil liberties in the state. William L. Witt was pulled over on Route 48 in Carneys Point in December 2012 after he approached a police officer with his high beams on and &#8220;failed to dim&#8221; as he passed. After speaking with Witt, the officer concluded he was intoxicated, performed a field sobriety test and placed him under arrest. While searching the car for evidence of open container alcohol consumption, the officer found a handgun in the center console. Witt sought at trial to suppress the gun on the ground that police performed an unreasonable search in violation of the the state constitution, and a state appeals court panel found in May of last year the officer did not meet the &#8220;exigent circumstances&#8221; standard for warrantless searches [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[106],"class_list":["post-11173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-and-politics","tag-4th-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11173\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.megalextoria.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}