Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!ucsd!pacbell.com!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: warack@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Christopher Warack) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Anti-Balistic Missiles Now Message-ID: <1990Dec15.014149.16495@cbnews.att.com> Date: 15 Dec 90 01:41:49 GMT References: <1990Dec14.002807.27573@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept. Lines: 56 Approved: military@att.att.com From: warack@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Christopher Warack) In article <1990Dec14.002807.27573@cbnews.att.com> bobmcc@tcs.com (Bob McCormick) writes: >From: bobmcc@tcs.com (Bob McCormick) >From: swilliam@dtoa1.dt.navy.mil (Williams) > >|> >>If not, how does a carrier battle group defend itself from incoming >warheads? >|> >|> Aircraft carriers have various "lines of defense" against anti-shipping >|> missiles: >|> > {description of defense zones deleted} > >Yes, the carriers have an elaborate system for defense againt anti-shipping >missles, but these are usually air-launched or surface-launched >(or sub-launched?) "medium-sized" missiles (my term). I think the original >post concerned ballistic missiles, which are larger and launched from >further away. > >Could a ballistic missile be accurately targetted at a ship convoy moving at >20-30 knots, even it it was travelling in a straight line? How about some blue sky here: stick a GPS receiver in it -- so it knows where it is; feed it a link from something like an AWACS or RORSAT that knows where the ship is; add maneuverability (and stir till thick :-). Still wouldn't be ultra-accurate given GPS errors at high speeds and any lag in a data link. Also, there would be ECM to contend with, maybe. Manueverable RV's are around (MARV's) but I don't know how much they can do. >What is the set-up time for the missile targetting information? >For example, if an airplane or small boat spotted a convoy, you could estimate >the location of the convoy in the next hour or so, with a certain error, >probability, which could be large. Could a missile be quickly re-programmed >and fired in under an hour? Theoretically, yes; given a big enough computer and a "hot link" to the ready missile. In reality, ???? >Obviously, the missile could not be expected to hit the deck of a moving >ship, i would think this scenario may be realistic only for >nuclear-tipped missiles. > >Bob McCormick Teknekron Communications Systems >bobmcc@tcs.com Berkeley, CA, USA Chris -- Christopher A. Warack warack@eecs.umich.edu Graduate Dept, EECS (313) 665-4789 University of Michigan