Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Terrorist tactics (Re: Tired of bogus subject lines?)
Message-ID: <6272@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 24 Sep 89 17:36:10 GMT
References: <7921@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <1650@unocss.UUCP> <11578@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 20

(This message violates the RFC)

In article <11578@boulder.Colorado.EDU>, rsk@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Rich Kulawiec) writes:
> This would probably be a good time to point out that at no time did I
> state that I had actually installed the code to [drop articles]

Well, you strongly implied it.

> Perhaps "terrorist tactics" is a bit
> premature and (in my opinion) a bit of a loaded phrase.

I agree it's a loaded phrase. Just like other loaded phrases, such as "evil
and rude", it was intended to convey my string distaste for the action you
were advocating.

-- 
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
"That is not the Usenet tradition, but it's a solidly-entrenched            U
 delusion now." -- brian@ucsd.Edu (Brian Kantor)