Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!bionet!sdsu!crash!victoro
From: victoro@crash.cts.com (Victor O'Rear)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: CoSession & Novell
Message-ID: <447@crash.cts.com>
Date: 28 Sep 89 17:33:03 GMT
References: <1102@koko.CSUStan.EDU>
Reply-To: victoro@crash.cts.com (Victor O'Rear)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 27

In article <1102@koko.CSUStan.EDU> jb@koko.csustan.edu.UUCP (John Birchfield) writes:
>I am attempting to use co-session to talk to a pc hooked into a Novell
>network with less than satisfactory results - i.e. the machine locks
>up at arbitrary points and that's all the session can handle
>
>Specifically I am interested in finding out if anyone has successfully
>used cosession or pc anywhere or relay gold to achieve remote access to
>a Novell Network.
>
>The company I work for wants the cosession type of access because it lets
>them use their normal word processors etc.
>
>Thanks in advance


We have been using Close-Up 3.01A for the past year with no complaints but speed and the supseptablity to line noise.  Close-Up shell must be loaded on the ComServer before anything else, but the IPX and NET3 shells must be loaded first.  The graphics screen must be the same on both ends, I believe.
Very expencive, but it does a good job.

-- 
===============================================================================
|  Victor O'Rear {hplabs!hp-sdd, cbosgd, ucsd, nosc.mil}!crash!victoro       |
|  USnail: P.O. Box 3972, La Mesa, California  92044, United States of America|
|  mil : crash!victoro@nosc.ARPA and work: (619) 571-1222                    |
|                                                                             |
|  "Fools, Idiots! Don't they realize that they are dealing with forces      |
|        beyond comprehension!" - "Doctor Science"                            |
===============================================================================