Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!ilan343
From: ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Unix for a 386-PC? Summary (627 lines)
Message-ID: <1989Sep30.010522.25322@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 30 Sep 89 01:05:22 GMT
References: <8909290807.AA17277@euler.Berkeley.EDU> <629@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <39233@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <655@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 10

In article <655@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
>
>  I won't get into non-standard. If BSD and naked ATT are standard,
>xenix isn't. Someone might say that there are more copies of xenix than
>any other flavor of unix (but since I can't find the source for that
>belief I can't press the claim).
>
Correct me if I wrong.  As of its latest version, Xenix is SysV 3.2.
With the exception of Sun's 386i (running SunOS which derived from
BSD 4.2), Sys V is the de facto standard for Unix in the Intel world.