Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!asylum.sf.ca.us!romkey From: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us (John Romkey) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Comment on RFC1124 (?) Message-ID: <8909272331.AA28023@asylum.sf.ca.us> Date: 28 Sep 89 06:31:19 GMT References: <5446@asylum.SF.CA.US> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us Organization: The Internet Lines: 8 I'd suggest that rather than ban them, ensure that all RFC's are available in plain text, and allow postscript versions as a secondary format for them. But certainly never release an RFC in postscript-only format. - john romkey USENET/UUCP: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us Internet: romkey@ftp.com "Live the life you love, Use a god you trust, and don't take it all too seriously." - Love & Rockets