Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!hybrid!chance!john From: john@chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Old Group Deletion Procedures Summary: It must be hard picking groups... Keywords: newsgroups Message-ID: <1989Sep30.034347.11365@chance.UUCP> Date: 30 Sep 89 03:43:47 GMT References: <3137@ur-cc.UUCP> <1989Sep26.212755.8458@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <22888@looking.on.ca> <6342@ficc.uu.net> Reply-To: john@chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan) Organization: Haphazard Lines: 16 In article <6342@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: |In article <22888@looking.on.ca>, brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes: |> So how about it? It is harder to pick a group today? Are there more |> mistakes today? | |Well, have a look over in comp.sys.intel. The current discussion there is |whether it's appropriate to talk about xenix on intel 310 boxes there, or |in comp.sys.intel.ipsc310, or in comp.unix.xenix. Or look in the unix-pc.* groups for the ``I would like to run UNIX on my PC'' and ``How do I make my PC talk to a UNIX box'' articles. Of course I'd be the first to admit that unix-pc is a misleading name. -- John R. MacMillan "Don't you miss it...don't you miss it... john@chance.UUCP Some of you people just about missed it." ...!utcsri!hcr!chance!john -- Talking Heads