Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!asylum.sf.ca.us!romkey
From: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us (John Romkey)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Comment on RFC1124 (?)
Message-ID: <8909272331.AA28023@asylum.sf.ca.us>
Date: 28 Sep 89 06:31:19 GMT
References: <5446@asylum.SF.CA.US>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

I'd suggest that rather than ban them, ensure that all RFC's are
available in plain text, and allow postscript versions as a secondary
format for them. But certainly never release an RFC in postscript-only
format.
			- john romkey
USENET/UUCP: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us	Internet: romkey@ftp.com
"Live the life you love, Use a god you trust,
 and don't take it all too seriously." - Love & Rockets