Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!uh2 From: UH2@PSUVM.BITNET (Lee Sailer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: Wouldn't it be nice... Message-ID: <89273.101249UH2@PSUVM.BITNET> Date: 30 Sep 89 14:12:49 GMT References: <413@DB0TUI11.BITNET> Organization: Penn State University Lines: 30 I think your wish list is just fine, though I don't expect to see some of them very soon (eg multiple inheritance). However, others are really "just" new classes that could be grafted on by anyone. Which brings me to my real point. Why isn't there very much source posted in Smalltalk? The C community's strength lies in the long history of sharing, especially code. I'd like to see the same thing true here. I am just bginning to learn Smalltalk, and I know that I would benefit from perusing other peoples classes. As a teaching example, I am trying to build a trivial toy Payroll system. I already have had to sort of invent style from scratch, because I have no suitable models to follow. When it works, I plan to post it here. Why? 1. Maybe someone will say, "You clod. That's not how to do that!" 2. Or, "Wow. What a good way to do that. Thanks." 3. As an excercise in sharing. Right now, I don't even know how to dump the new classes and methods I've added into a file so that I can post them here. What will people who already have a class TimeCard do when they try to install my classes? Now, I bet that some of you are way ahead of me, here. You have some kind of toy demo that you could post, and we could all learn. BTW. I know that *real* source should go to one of the source groups. I am only suggesting that small sources for discusssion and education should be posted here.