Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!mcgill-vision!clyde!maxwell!timl
From: timl@maxwell.Concordia.CA ( TIM LAPIN )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: SuperPaint 2.0
Keywords: What the...
Message-ID: <1315@clyde.Concordia.CA>
Date: 27 Sep 89 20:42:45 GMT
References: <734@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <26695@dhw68k.cts.com>
Sender: sccs@Clyde.Concordia.CA
Reply-To: timl@maxwell.Concordia.Ca ( TIM LAPIN )
Organization: Concordia University, Montreal Quebec
Lines: 21

In article <26695@dhw68k.cts.com> thecloud@dhw68k.cts.com (Ken McLeod) writes:
>
>  SuperPaint 2.0's 'PICT' format doesn't seem to be quite standard. I also
>experienced quite a few crashes-while-saving, usually with files that had
>a number of grouped objects in the Draw layer (between 20 and 50 individual
>objects). 
>  Needless to say, I don't use SuperPaint 2.0. Are other people experiencing
>similar crashes? I haven't heard anything on the net to indicate this is a
>quality-assurance blowit of Word 3 proportions, although if our experience
>is typical, it would sure seem that way!
>

I too have problems with Superpaint 2.0.  When I try to read in scanned images
at 300 dpi it crashes.  When I try at 200 dpi it firsts tries to re-scale the
drawings then it crashes.  If any one has a fix to this or a reason why I
would appreciate it.

-- 
Tim Lapin            |Tel:       (514) 848-7639           | My opinion is that
Computer Centre      |INTERNET:  timl@maxwell.concordia.ca| my opinion is mine,
Concordia University |BITNET:    timl@vax2.concordia.ca   | all mine. (Ahem)