Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!hybrid!chance!john
From: john@chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Old Group Deletion Procedures
Summary: It must be hard picking groups...
Keywords: newsgroups
Message-ID: <1989Sep30.034347.11365@chance.UUCP>
Date: 30 Sep 89 03:43:47 GMT
References: <3137@ur-cc.UUCP> <1989Sep26.212755.8458@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <22888@looking.on.ca> <6342@ficc.uu.net>
Reply-To: john@chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan)
Organization: Haphazard
Lines: 16

In article <6342@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
|In article <22888@looking.on.ca>, brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes:
|> So how about it?  It is harder to pick a group today?  Are there more
|> mistakes today?
|
|Well, have a look over in comp.sys.intel. The current discussion there is
|whether it's appropriate to talk about xenix on intel 310 boxes there, or
|in comp.sys.intel.ipsc310, or in comp.unix.xenix.

Or look in the unix-pc.* groups for the ``I would like to run UNIX on
my PC'' and ``How do I make my PC talk to a UNIX box'' articles.  Of
course I'd be the first to admit that unix-pc is a misleading name.
-- 
John R. MacMillan           "Don't you miss it...don't you miss it...
john@chance.UUCP             Some of you people just about missed it."
...!utcsri!hcr!chance!john        -- Talking Heads