Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: INTEL 310 Keywords: intel 310 ipsc Message-ID: <6320@ficc.uu.net> Date: 26 Sep 89 21:46:18 GMT References: <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <806@sdrc.UUCP> <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Distribution: na Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 14 In article <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>, bender@oobleck2.Central.Sun.COM (Michael Bender) writes: > side thread of discussion about the 310 itself? I don't know that it > warrants a seperate newsgroup, and I don't know if comp.sys.intel is > the right place to discuss it either (seems to be mostly about the 486, > 586, 686, 786, 886, 986, 1086, 1186... well, you get the idea). I think comp.sys.intel is the best place to discuss the 310. comp.unix.xenix seems to be mainly for folks running one of the system-V based xenixes on IBM-clones. Sigh. Crossposting to comp.unix.xenix might be an idea, though. -- Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-' "That is not the Usenet tradition, but it's a solidly-entrenched U delusion now." -- brian@ucsd.Edu (Brian Kantor)