Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: dattier@jolnet.orpk.il.us (David Tamkin) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Splits of NNX? Message-ID:Date: 25 Sep 89 16:12:00 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: Jolnet Public Access Unix Lines: 34 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 411, message 8 of 8 From Carl Moore, in volume 9, issue 389: | I am also NOT aware of N0X/N1X prefixes in use in the following | splits after 1980: | 305/407 in Florida | 303/719 in Colorado [The absence of N0X/N1X in the 617/508 split had been noted before.] | The only splits from 1965 thru 1981 are: | 305/904 in Florida in 1965 (305 was split again last year to form 407) | 703/804 in Virginia in 1973 (N0X/N1X has since come to DC area, with | some of those prefixes coming to Va. suburbs, in 703) And 713/409 in Texas in perhaps the mid-'70's, and 714/619 in California around 1979 or 1980. | [Moderator's Note: The 703/804 split was the first, nearly twenty five years | ago, if memory serves me. Then the 305/904 split. Then none for many years, | until the one in New York. Is my timing correct? PT] I think the very first split was 404/912 in Georgia. Probably the only splits where N0X/N1X prefixes *were* used first have been 213/818, 212/718, 312/708, and 201/908 (unless one considers the change from seven-digit to eleven-digit interstate dialing in metropolitan DC a "split"). NNX adherence seems to be the rule rather than the exception: I believe 214/903 and 415/510 will be splitting without use of N0X/N1X. David Tamkin dattier@jolnet.orpk.il.us {attctc,netsys,ddsw1}!jolnet!dattier P. O. Box 813 Rosemont, Illinois 60018-0813 (312) 693-0591 (708) 518-6769 BIX: dattier GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN CIS: 73720,1570 Jolnet is a public access system, where every user expresses personal opinions.