Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: INTEL 310
Keywords: intel 310 ipsc
Message-ID: <6320@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 26 Sep 89 21:46:18 GMT
References: <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <806@sdrc.UUCP> <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 14

In article <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>, bender@oobleck2.Central.Sun.COM (Michael Bender) writes:
> side thread of discussion about the 310 itself?  I don't know that it
> warrants a seperate newsgroup, and I don't know if comp.sys.intel is
> the right place to discuss it either (seems to be mostly about the 486,
> 586, 686, 786, 886, 986, 1086, 1186... well, you get the idea).

I think comp.sys.intel is the best place to discuss the 310. comp.unix.xenix
seems to be mainly for folks running one of the system-V based xenixes on
IBM-clones. Sigh. Crossposting to comp.unix.xenix might be an idea, though.
-- 
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
"That is not the Usenet tradition, but it's a solidly-entrenched            U
 delusion now." -- brian@ucsd.Edu (Brian Kantor)