Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!seismo!sundc!newstop!sun!turnpike!argv From: argv%turnpike@Sun.COM (Dan Heller) Newsgroups: comp.mail.mush Subject: Re: xmush ??? Message-ID: <125668@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 3 Oct 89 06:21:17 GMT References: <1796@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM Reply-To: argv@sun.UUCP (Dan Heller) Distribution: usa Lines: 19 In article <1796@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> browning@MATH.UCLA.EDU () writes: > When can we expect to see an X11 interface for mush? > After mushview matures some? I'm sure it would be > well received. Lots of people like mush, and lots > like xwindows. (Don't they?) Well, XView is Sun's user interface toolkit for X and it's freely available. It's based on Sunview, so there should be few code changes (altho a bunch of #defines) to get it to run under that. However, for the time being, XView is too buggy to use reliably, and I don't want to release a version of mush that will support it unless I can allow a makefile to simply have -DXVIEW to compile for the XView version. Right now, there just has to be too many code changes. Probably by the time R4 is released, I might have done something. dan----- My postings reflect my opinion only -- not the opinion of any company.