Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bionet!agate!eos!eugene From: eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: Re: Communicating DSP Equations (was: Re: DSP textbook) Message-ID: <5258@eos.UUCP> Date: 27 Sep 89 17:31:51 GMT References:<1989Sep24.032009.11720@utzoo.uucp> <473@ctycal.UUCP> Reply-To: eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Calif. Lines: 22 Sorry, I voted for, and wanted to read about DSP. Not about formatter wars. I thought editor wars were bad. Sorry I had to inject this non-DSP related thing. Sure it's a loss. There is an real incentive to dump vt100s, 3270s, what ever! Think about. What are you doing at such a backward company? Second, news had better start thinking about the exchange of imagery and Lo! sound [hey wait a minute, ain't that DSP?]. If you guys can't start to agree on stuff in the BACKGROUND (RFPs, RFCs, RFIs), then theres no hope for news. Hey, Etherphones (tm) exist, the BSD talk(1) and VMS phone programs are DUMB. And people are worried about HDTV? Gawd! you guys are your own worst enemies (Detroit on the net). Tell me when you start discussing real DSP. I'll resubscribe then. Another gross generalization from --eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov resident cynic at the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers: "You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?" "If my mail does not reach you, please accept my apology." {ncar,decwrl,hplabs,uunet}!ames!eugene Live free or die.