Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!galadriel!pcf
From: pcf@galadriel.bt.co.uk (Pete French)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the MINIX Memory Model and merging sources (long)
Message-ID: <366@galadriel.bt.co.uk>
Date: 28 Sep 89 10:22:08 GMT
References: <599@augean.OZ>
Organization: RT6115, BTRL, Martlesham Heath, England
Lines: 18

From article <599@augean.OZ>, by cagney@chook.ua.oz (Andrew Cagney - aka Noid):
> 
> 1. No memory management (e.g. ATARI ST, COMMODORE 64, MACINTOSH et al.)
> =======================
> 
Commodore 64 - you have got to be kidding ! We considered a port to the BBC
micro, but it required lots of sideways ram for switching, woould have to swap
to disk and wwould cerainly not run on a basic machine.

If you can port Minix to a 64K 6502 machine I will be most impressed.

-Pete.

-- 
       -Pete French.               | "I'm just a vision on your TV screen,
  British Telecom Research Labs.   |  Just something conjoured from a dream"
 Martlesham Heath, East Anglia.    |
All my own thoughts (of course)    |                       -SIOUXSIE.