Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!agate!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: AIX (is it unix)? Message-ID: <12207@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> Date: 24 Sep 89 03:27:29 GMT References: <1702@naucse.UUCP><978@mtxinu.UUCP> <868@cirrusl.UUCP> <12197@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <2487@auspex.auspex.com> Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com Reply-To: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 19 In article <2487@auspex.auspex.com> guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes: >>Clearly not. Without something like Streams, you can't easily add support ^^^^^^ >>for new protocols. >all I'll say >is that I don't see any evidence to back up a claim stated as bluntly as >"without something like streams...". That depends on your own definition of "easily", doesn't it? You can agree or disagree on whether it's easier for you or not, but the statement still holds for some value of "easy" (mine, for instance), thus it's not an absolute statement (like the original one I was responding to). Eduardo Krell AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com