Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!nosc!logicon.arpa!trantor.harris-atd.com!pak!thaker
From: thaker@pak.harris-atd.com (Gautam Thaker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: gcc/g++ vs. native cc on R2000
Message-ID: <2727@trantor.harris-atd.com>
Date: 26 Sep 89 13:57:27 GMT
References: <1597@brazos.Rice.edu> 
Sender: news@trantor.harris-atd.com
Reply-To: thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com (Gautam Thaker)
Organization: Advanced Technology Dept., Harris Corp., Melbourne, Fl.
Lines: 18

In article  mende@athos.rutgers.edu (Bob Mende Pie) writes:
>While I have not tried this on my titans, gnu gcc/g++ has support for
>both the R2000 chip and for system V unix.  Thus you should be able to
>build it and have it work on the titan.

While this is not exactly a c++ question, can anyone comment on the
quality of code produced by gcc/g++ compiler for the R2000 when
compared to the C compiler from MIPS itself?
The MIPS compiler is very good and it would be interesting to know
how close gcc comes to this.

Gautam H. Thaker            Harris Corp; ESS; Advanced Technology Dept.
(407) 729-7099              MS 3A/1912; P. O. Box 37; Melbourne, FL 32902
Internet:                   thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com

Gautam H. Thaker            Harris Corp; GSS; Advanced Technology Dept.
(407) 729-7099              MS 3A/1912; P. O. Box 37; Melbourne, FL 32902
Internet:                   thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com