Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re:  Splits of NNX?
Message-ID: 
Date: 27 Sep 89 15:31:34 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Lines: 23
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 413, message 9 of 9

(This is primarily in answer to David Tamkin's comments).

714/619 in California was in 1982
713/409 in Texas was in 1983
(my list appearing in telecom had these)

When was 404/912 done?  I had never heard of that one before.
Does anyone in Bellcore know about the splits occurring before
305/904 in 1965?

No, 214 area DOES have N0X/N1X prefixes, although these may be limited
to Dallas area rather than popping up in distant places like Tyler and
Texarkana.  Also, 415 did prepare for N0X/N1X (I have not yet come
across any such prefixes, however).

Earlier mail to telecom said that the inter-areacode local calls in DC
area will be TEN (not eleven) digits, where the leading 1+ is left
off.  Toll calls require the leading 1+.  I called this an areacode
split because area code 202 is being reduced to DC proper (to allow
for previously-forbidden prefix duplication), and will no longer be
available for suburban points.

 -Carl Moore