Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!ilan343 From: ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Unix for a 386-PC? Summary (627 lines) Message-ID: <1989Sep30.010522.25322@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 30 Sep 89 01:05:22 GMT References: <8909290807.AA17277@euler.Berkeley.EDU> <629@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <39233@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <655@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44) Distribution: usa Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 10 In article <655@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes: > > I won't get into non-standard. If BSD and naked ATT are standard, >xenix isn't. Someone might say that there are more copies of xenix than >any other flavor of unix (but since I can't find the source for that >belief I can't press the claim). > Correct me if I wrong. As of its latest version, Xenix is SysV 3.2. With the exception of Sun's 386i (running SunOS which derived from BSD 4.2), Sys V is the de facto standard for Unix in the Intel world.