Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!draken!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Macintosh Portable and IIci Intro
Message-ID: <1760@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 25 Sep 89 11:18:55 GMT
References: <34888@apple.Apple.COM> <12031@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <34992@apple.Apple.COM> <525@cpdaux.UUCP>
Reply-To: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 18

In article <525@cpdaux.UUCP> cpdaux!steve@apple.com (Steve Lemke) writes:
{In article <34992@apple.Apple.COM{ chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes:
{}The Mac IIx was 15% faster than the Mac II. The Mac IIci is about 50%
{}faster than the IIx, and if you add a cache card to that you can get up to
{}50-70% *more* above that.

{Cache card?  Where can we get such a beast?  Do we have to build one ourself?
{I thought it wasn't going to be available until next year...  :-)

But you CAN get a video card now, and supposedly that makes the IIci
faster, since the 68030 handles the video in the internal card (or,
that was the impression I got. I could be wrong, of course)

Happy Hacking !

h+@nada.kth.se
-- 
Documentation is like sex: When it's good, it's fantastic, when it's bad...