Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!bionet!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!ditmela!hans
From: hans@ditmela.oz (Hans Eriksson)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: RFI: Oracle, Informix & Sybase
Message-ID: <7206@ditmela.oz>
Date: 26 Sep 89 00:01:55 GMT
References: <1460001@hp-ptp.HP.COM> <5527@tank.uchicago.edu>
Reply-To: hans@ditmela.oz.au (Hans Eriksson)
Organization: CSIRO/DIT, Melbourne, Australia (on leave from SICS, Sweden)
Lines: 15

In article <5527@tank.uchicago.edu> monty@delphi.UUCP (Monty Mullig) writes:
>
> the primary strengths of sybase were:

I've learnt that Sybase SQL is not the Standard SQL, at least not the
mebedded one. How much it differs I do not know, but it was too much
difference for us anyway. I would say that this would be a major
consideration also.

/hans
-- 
Hans Eriksson (hans@ditmela.oz.au)
CSIRO/DIT, 55 Barry Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia (we are GMT+10)
Tel: +61 3 347-8644 Fax: +61 3 347-8987 Home: +61 3 534-5188
On a years leave from Swedish Institute of Computer Science (hans@sics.se)