Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re:  Splits of NNX?
Message-ID: 
Date: 2 Oct 89 13:16:46 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Lines: 12
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 424, message 7 of 9

Mail to johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us failed (invalid host name),
but this message is of general interest:

Earlier messages to telecom said that 7 digit local calls from 201
area across NPA boundary were being changed to 11 digits to help
with prefix shortage while awaiting 201/908 split.  I heard nothing
about local calls from 609 area across NPA boundary, however.
The use of 1 before area code was applied to 609 as well as to 201;
a message to me said "statewide uniformity" as to why this was done,
before I noticed 2 N0X/N1X prefixes in Toms River, just a 7 digit
local call from Barnegat (609 area); in other words, no special
timeout on such local call.