Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!polyslo!vlsi3b15!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: dmg@lid.mitre.org (David Gursky)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: RE: Review of NIST anti-virus paper...
Message-ID: <0013.8910021119.AA27772@ge.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 30 Sep 89 13:30:38 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List 
Lines: 8
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

In the VIRUS-L Digest V2 #207, time@oxtrap.oxtrap (Tim Endres) writes:

> Sounds like the committee was seated with commercial software vendors!

The NIST paper was written by two staff members there, and is not a
committee report.  I've received some feedback from NIST on my
comments to the effect of "Good point.  We did not intend the bias
towards commercial software, but it is certainly there".