Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!mtxinu!sybase!binky!tim From: tim@binky.sybase.com (Tim Wood) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: Parsing Query Languages in the Client or Server Message-ID: <6347@sybase.sybase.com> Date: 28 Sep 89 17:33:25 GMT References: <6155@sybase.sybase.com> <17450@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <632@daitc.daitc.mil> <6253@sybase.sybase.com> <637@daitc.daitc.mil> <6291@sybase.sybase.com> <641@daitc.daitc.mil> Sender: news@sybase.sybase.com Reply-To: tim@binky.UUCP (Tim Wood) Organization: Sybase, Inc. Lines: 24 In article <641@daitc.daitc.mil> jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jon Krueger) writes: >OK, I'll provide an example... > [ example film library schema ] >This will allow us to put all sorts of delightful queries.... > >>Let's agree on the scenario. For server checking, a batch of SQL >>(procedure definition or ad-hoc) is sent straight to the server... > >OK. By "batch" I assume you mean a "bunch"; that is, you intend to >support interactive applications? Yes. Note that the front-end may application may be a conventional "batch" application, or interactive. The server is not aware of which, however it assumes interactive response time needs. >Please supply some sample queries. >Then we'll run through the whole scenario. No, thank you. I just don't find this problem interesting enough. -TW Sybase, Inc. / 6475 Christie Ave. / Emeryville, CA / 94608 415-596-3500 tim@sybase.com {pacbell,pyramid,sun,{uunet,ucbvax}!mtxinu}!sybase!tim Voluntary disclaimer: This message is solely my personal opinion. It is not a representation of Sybase, Inc. OK.