Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!bionet!sdsu!crash!victoro From: victoro@crash.cts.com (Victor O'Rear) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: CoSession & Novell Message-ID: <447@crash.cts.com> Date: 28 Sep 89 17:33:03 GMT References: <1102@koko.CSUStan.EDU> Reply-To: victoro@crash.cts.com (Victor O'Rear) Distribution: usa Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA Lines: 27 In article <1102@koko.CSUStan.EDU> jb@koko.csustan.edu.UUCP (John Birchfield) writes: >I am attempting to use co-session to talk to a pc hooked into a Novell >network with less than satisfactory results - i.e. the machine locks >up at arbitrary points and that's all the session can handle > >Specifically I am interested in finding out if anyone has successfully >used cosession or pc anywhere or relay gold to achieve remote access to >a Novell Network. > >The company I work for wants the cosession type of access because it lets >them use their normal word processors etc. > >Thanks in advance We have been using Close-Up 3.01A for the past year with no complaints but speed and the supseptablity to line noise. Close-Up shell must be loaded on the ComServer before anything else, but the IPX and NET3 shells must be loaded first. The graphics screen must be the same on both ends, I believe. Very expencive, but it does a good job. -- =============================================================================== | Victor O'Rear {hplabs!hp-sdd, cbosgd, ucsd, nosc.mil}!crash!victoro | | USnail: P.O. Box 3972, La Mesa, California 92044, United States of America| | mil : crash!victoro@nosc.ARPA and work: (619) 571-1222 | | | | "Fools, Idiots! Don't they realize that they are dealing with forces | | beyond comprehension!" - "Doctor Science" | ===============================================================================