Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!wet!epsilon From: epsilon@wet.UUCP (Eric P. Scott) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Comment on RFC1124 (?) Summary: What took so long to get DECENT machine readable RFCs? Message-ID: <611@wet.UUCP> Date: 29 Sep 89 11:00:02 GMT References: <5446@asylum.SF.CA.US> Reply-To: epsilon@wet.UUCP (Eric P. Scott) Organization: Wetware Diversions, San Francisco Lines: 12 In article <5446@asylum.SF.CA.US> karl@asylum.SF.CA.US (Karl Auerbach) writes: >I propose that we ban postscript RFCs. Where have you been? PostScript has been the de facto standard for FTPable documents for quite some time. IMHO, PostScript RFCs are long overdue. More please! I still have hardcopy RFCs from the days when the NIC mailed them out. The text versions pale by comparison. Now if I can find textured manilla covers... -=EPS=-