Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rutgers!dptg!att!chinet!ignatz From: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: Good Suggestion from Jonathan there!!!! Summary: Actually, make 'tag' orthogonal.. Keywords: elm tag Message-ID: <9705@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 29 Sep 89 21:22:37 GMT References: <1169@ispi.UUCP> <440@hades.OZ> Reply-To: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat) Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix Lines: 9 While discussing 'tag', frankly it would make sense to make it orthogonal for all reasonable commands--i.e., all tagged messages are forwarded, bounced, saved, deleted, etc. This would make handling classes of messages a *lot* easier! Dave Ihnat Analysts International Corporation ignatz@homebru.chi.il.us (preferred return address) ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us