Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!mtxinu!sybase!binky!tim
From: tim@binky.sybase.com (Tim Wood)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Parsing Query Languages in the Client or Server
Message-ID: <6347@sybase.sybase.com>
Date: 28 Sep 89 17:33:25 GMT
References: <6155@sybase.sybase.com> <17450@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <632@daitc.daitc.mil> <6253@sybase.sybase.com> <637@daitc.daitc.mil> <6291@sybase.sybase.com> <641@daitc.daitc.mil>
Sender: news@sybase.sybase.com
Reply-To: tim@binky.UUCP (Tim Wood)
Organization: Sybase, Inc.
Lines: 24

In article <641@daitc.daitc.mil> jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jon Krueger) writes:
>OK, I'll provide an example...
>	[ example film library schema ]
>This will allow us to put all sorts of delightful queries....
>
>>Let's agree on the scenario.  For server checking, a batch of SQL
>>(procedure definition or ad-hoc) is sent straight to the server...
>
>OK.  By "batch" I assume you mean a "bunch"; that is, you intend to
>support interactive applications?  

Yes.  Note that the front-end may application may be a conventional
"batch" application, or interactive.  The server is not aware of which,
however it assumes interactive response time needs.

>Please supply some sample queries.
>Then we'll run through the whole scenario.  

No, thank you.  I just don't find this problem interesting enough.
-TW
Sybase, Inc. / 6475 Christie Ave. / Emeryville, CA / 94608	  415-596-3500
tim@sybase.com          {pacbell,pyramid,sun,{uunet,ucbvax}!mtxinu}!sybase!tim
Voluntary disclaimer: This message is solely my personal opinion.
		      It is not a representation of Sybase, Inc.  OK.