Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!um-math!sharkey!cfctech!teemc!hpftc!zardoz!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!apple!netcom!hinton
From: hinton@netcom.UUCP (Greg Hinton)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: uSoft/Apple and user interfaces
Message-ID: <2213@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 26 Aug 89 22:24:18 GMT
References: <9025@cs.Buffalo.EDU> <3035@bucsb.UUCP>
Reply-To: hinton@netcom.UUCP (Greg Hinton)
Organization: NetCom -- San Jose, CA
Lines: 14

In article <3035@bucsb.UUCP> bear@bucsb.bu.edu (Blair M. Burtan) writes:
 [ . . . . ]
>Now the question is, can Jobs sue Apple and can Xerox sue Jobs?


Lots of folks have suggested that Xerox should sue Apple, but I read in
one of the many Apple/Jobs biographies (I'll try to dig up the reference
if someone insists) that Xerox licensed the technology to Apple (as I recall,
in exchange for Apple stock).  Anyone know more about this?

-- 
Greg Hinton
INET: hinton@netcom.uucp
UUCP: ...!uunet!apple!netcom!hinton