Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Lisps Message-ID: <6617@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 28 Sep 89 00:48:48 GMT References:Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 13 From ted@nmsu.edu (Ted Dunning): > trivial and lucid in lisps that support continuations and/or engines. > try scheme, allegro common lisp, symbolics common lisp, or xerox's > interlisp offerings. I take it the Lisp community does not value portability... what happens when you want to take code from one manufacturer's Lisp and compile it on a different system? Also: how about exception handling? Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu