Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!agate!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: AIX (is it unix)?
Message-ID: <12207@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 24 Sep 89 03:27:29 GMT
References: <1702@naucse.UUCP>  <978@mtxinu.UUCP> <868@cirrusl.UUCP> <12197@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <2487@auspex.auspex.com>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

In article <2487@auspex.auspex.com> guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:

 >>Clearly not. Without something like Streams, you can't easily add support
							  ^^^^^^
 >>for new protocols.

>all I'll say
>is that I don't see any evidence to back up a claim stated as bluntly as
>"without something like streams...".

That depends on your own definition of "easily", doesn't it?
You can agree or disagree on whether it's easier for you or not,
but the statement still holds for some value of "easy" (mine,
for instance), thus it's not an absolute statement (like the original
one I was responding to).
    
Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell  Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com