Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Nice to Swallow
Message-ID: <8909272131.AA00948@GAFFA.MIT.EDU>
Date: 27 Sep 89 21:31:06 GMT
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: Doug Alan 

> [Robert Rubinoff:] It seems plausible to me that the interviewer
> mis-heard or mis-remembered what Kate said.  These things do happen.

Is it plausible that the interviewer misheard Kate?  Yes, it is
*plausible*.  However, it is far from the likeliest explanation.  It
is *not* plausible that the interviewer misremembered what Kate said.
This was clearly not an interview transccribed via memory.

I'd like to point out that for each album Kate lists her favorite
tracks.  Every other song name is correct, or a shortened version of
the correct name.  If the interviewer was so bad, how come his or her
accuracy on the other song titles is on the mark?

|>oug