Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!philmtl!philabs!crpmks!gallium!garyb From: garyb@gallium.UUCP (Gary Blumenstein) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: Good Suggestion from Jonathan there!!!! Keywords: elm tag Message-ID: <387@gallium.UUCP> Date: 3 Oct 89 03:09:41 GMT References: <1169@ispi.UUCP> <440@hades.OZ> <9705@chinet.chi.il.us> Reply-To: garyb@gallium.UUCP (Gary Blumenstein) Organization: gallium, Wingdale NY Lines: 14 In article <9705@chinet.chi.il.us> ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat) writes: >While discussing 'tag', frankly it would make sense to make it orthogonal for >all reasonable commands--i.e., all tagged messages are forwarded, bounced, >saved, deleted, etc. This would make handling classes of messages a *lot* >easier! I'll second that. It's an excellent idea! -- Gary Blumenstein, UNIX Network Administrator // CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION, USA =========================================================================== Voice: (914) 347-4700 7 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 FAX : (914) 347-5687 uucp: ...{philabs, gaboon}!crpmks!{sysadm, garyb}