Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Splits of NNX? Message-ID:Date: 2 Oct 89 13:16:46 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 12 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 424, message 7 of 9 Mail to johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us failed (invalid host name), but this message is of general interest: Earlier messages to telecom said that 7 digit local calls from 201 area across NPA boundary were being changed to 11 digits to help with prefix shortage while awaiting 201/908 split. I heard nothing about local calls from 609 area across NPA boundary, however. The use of 1 before area code was applied to 609 as well as to 201; a message to me said "statewide uniformity" as to why this was done, before I noticed 2 N0X/N1X prefixes in Toms River, just a 7 digit local call from Barnegat (609 area); in other words, no special timeout on such local call.