Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!Apple.COM!lsr
From: lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Macintosh Portable and IIci Intro
Message-ID: <4437@internal.Apple.COM>
Date: 28 Sep 89 16:48:40 GMT
Sender: usenet@Apple.COM
Organization: Objects-R-Us,  Apple Computer, Inc.
Lines: 15
References:<34888@apple.Apple.COM> <12031@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <34992@apple.Apple.COM> <2492@ualtamts.BITNET>

In article <2492@ualtamts.BITNET> userRED3@ualtamts.BITNET (Steve Wart) 
writes:
> I don't mean to be cynical, but could you back this up? I hope this isn't
> some stupid Excel-based benchmark.

I think Chuq was referring to the tests done by the National Software 
Testing Laboratories, a 3rd party testing organization.  The information I 
saw mentioned testing 3 applications that are available both on the 
Macintosh and on MS-DOS (Excel, Pagemaker, and Illustrator).

Larry Rosenstein, Apple Computer, Inc.
Object Specialist

Internet: lsr@Apple.com   UUCP: {nsc, sun}!apple!lsr
AppleLink: Rosenstein1