Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: ficc!peter@uunet.uu.net Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Trapping 10333 by AT&T Message-ID:Date: 25 Sep 89 06:42:19 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 6 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 408, message 6 of 9 What with all this talk of trapping 10288, I'd like to note that the pay phones at LAX route all calls through AT&T. Is this legal? I would hardly think that Sprint (my carrier of choice) has no access to LA! To top it all off, the AT&T operator insisted I'd placed my call via AT&T, and got quite rude about it.