Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!Apple.COM!lsr From: lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Macintosh Portable and IIci Intro Message-ID: <4437@internal.Apple.COM> Date: 28 Sep 89 16:48:40 GMT Sender: usenet@Apple.COM Organization: Objects-R-Us, Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 15 References:<34888@apple.Apple.COM> <12031@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <34992@apple.Apple.COM> <2492@ualtamts.BITNET> In article <2492@ualtamts.BITNET> userRED3@ualtamts.BITNET (Steve Wart) writes: > I don't mean to be cynical, but could you back this up? I hope this isn't > some stupid Excel-based benchmark. I think Chuq was referring to the tests done by the National Software Testing Laboratories, a 3rd party testing organization. The information I saw mentioned testing 3 applications that are available both on the Macintosh and on MS-DOS (Excel, Pagemaker, and Illustrator). Larry Rosenstein, Apple Computer, Inc. Object Specialist Internet: lsr@Apple.com UUCP: {nsc, sun}!apple!lsr AppleLink: Rosenstein1