Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!psueea!jove.cs.pdx.edu!bartonr
From: bartonr@jove.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: WB 1.3.2 distribution
Message-ID: <1771@psueea.UUCP>
Date: 2 Oct 89 18:09:54 GMT
Sender: news@psueea.UUCP
Reply-To: bartonr@jove.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Portland State University; Portland OR
Lines: 8


 ejkst@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Eric J. Kennedy) writes:
> Is the two-interlaced-one-non-interlaced-screen bug fixed in wb 1.3.2?

  Is this bug possibly hardware-related?  I have tried to duplicate this with
my A1000, but no matter what mix of interlaced and non-interlaced screens I
use, I can switch between them in any order with no problems.
  (Not that I'm complaining.)