Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!philmtl!philabs!crpmks!gallium!garyb
From: garyb@gallium.UUCP (Gary Blumenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Good Suggestion from Jonathan there!!!!
Keywords: elm tag
Message-ID: <387@gallium.UUCP>
Date: 3 Oct 89 03:09:41 GMT
References: <1169@ispi.UUCP> <440@hades.OZ> <9705@chinet.chi.il.us>
Reply-To: garyb@gallium.UUCP (Gary Blumenstein)
Organization: gallium, Wingdale NY
Lines: 14

In article <9705@chinet.chi.il.us> ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat) writes:

>While discussing 'tag', frankly it would make sense to make it orthogonal for
>all reasonable commands--i.e., all tagged messages are forwarded, bounced,
>saved, deleted, etc.  This would make handling classes of messages a *lot*
>easier!

I'll second that.  It's an excellent idea!

-- 
Gary Blumenstein, UNIX Network Administrator // CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION, USA
===========================================================================
Voice: (914) 347-4700                  7 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
FAX  : (914) 347-5687     uucp: ...{philabs, gaboon}!crpmks!{sysadm, garyb}