Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ginosko!usc!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!eecae!cps3xx!usenet
From: usenet@cps3xx.UUCP (Usenet file owner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 386 vs. 386SX ????
Message-ID: <4798@cps3xx.UUCP>
Date: 1 Oct 89 01:54:58 GMT
References: <1640021@hpspcoi.HP.COM>
Organization: Engineering, Michigan State U., E. Lansing MI
Lines: 16

From article <1640021@hpspcoi.HP.COM>, by dlow@hpspcoi.HP.COM (Danny Low):
>>Can anyone out there help me to decide if I should get a 386 or a 386SX?
> 
> The 386SX is basically an attempt to redo the 286 correctly. The
> SX makes sense only for people on a very tight budget or who have
> a 286 and want to do a cheap upgrade as there are SX upgrade kits
> for many 286 machines. IOW, get the real 386.'

Personally, I consider the 386SX the perfect choice for a home system.
Especially as 20MHz SX machines with a cache become available. I
consider the 386DX in 20+MHz as a machine for at work. 

j				|%|John Lawitzke, Dale Computer Corp., R&D
				|%|UUCP: uunet!frith!dale1!jhl	   	Work
				|%|      uunet!frith!dale1!ipecac!jhl 	Home
Inquiring minds just wondering. |%|Internet: jhl@frith.egr.msu.edu