Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!galadriel!pcf From: pcf@galadriel.bt.co.uk (Pete French) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Thoughts on the MINIX Memory Model and merging sources (long) Message-ID: <366@galadriel.bt.co.uk> Date: 28 Sep 89 10:22:08 GMT References: <599@augean.OZ> Organization: RT6115, BTRL, Martlesham Heath, England Lines: 18 From article <599@augean.OZ>, by cagney@chook.ua.oz (Andrew Cagney - aka Noid): > > 1. No memory management (e.g. ATARI ST, COMMODORE 64, MACINTOSH et al.) > ======================= > Commodore 64 - you have got to be kidding ! We considered a port to the BBC micro, but it required lots of sideways ram for switching, woould have to swap to disk and wwould cerainly not run on a basic machine. If you can port Minix to a 64K 6502 machine I will be most impressed. -Pete. -- -Pete French. | "I'm just a vision on your TV screen, British Telecom Research Labs. | Just something conjoured from a dream" Martlesham Heath, East Anglia. | All my own thoughts (of course) | -SIOUXSIE.