Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Dealing with multiple scripting languages (was: Elinating the 'rx' from AREXX) Message-ID: <4234@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 28 Sep 89 11:06:55 GMT References: <721@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> <1989Aug29.031707.9022@agate.uucp>Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 13 In article , shadow@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven T. Corzine) writes: > peter> The best solution, if you want to change things, is to add a > peter> standard command input seperate from stdin [...] > Maybe. Is it worth it? All the people adding REXX ports to programs think so. This is a different implementation of the same model. And one a lot easier to program. -- Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva `-_-' ...texbell!sugar!peter, or peter@sugar.hackercorp.com 'U` "before making up your mind, please read the book." -- sherry.mann "This is contrary to the spirit of rec.arts.sf-lovers" -- Jim Winer