Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!nosc!logicon.arpa!trantor.harris-atd.com!pak!thaker From: thaker@pak.harris-atd.com (Gautam Thaker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: gcc/g++ vs. native cc on R2000 Message-ID: <2727@trantor.harris-atd.com> Date: 26 Sep 89 13:57:27 GMT References: <1597@brazos.Rice.edu>Sender: news@trantor.harris-atd.com Reply-To: thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com (Gautam Thaker) Organization: Advanced Technology Dept., Harris Corp., Melbourne, Fl. Lines: 18 In article mende@athos.rutgers.edu (Bob Mende Pie) writes: >While I have not tried this on my titans, gnu gcc/g++ has support for >both the R2000 chip and for system V unix. Thus you should be able to >build it and have it work on the titan. While this is not exactly a c++ question, can anyone comment on the quality of code produced by gcc/g++ compiler for the R2000 when compared to the C compiler from MIPS itself? The MIPS compiler is very good and it would be interesting to know how close gcc comes to this. Gautam H. Thaker Harris Corp; ESS; Advanced Technology Dept. (407) 729-7099 MS 3A/1912; P. O. Box 37; Melbourne, FL 32902 Internet: thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com Gautam H. Thaker Harris Corp; GSS; Advanced Technology Dept. (407) 729-7099 MS 3A/1912; P. O. Box 37; Melbourne, FL 32902 Internet: thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com