Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Splits of NNX? Message-ID:Date: 27 Sep 89 15:31:34 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 23 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 413, message 9 of 9 (This is primarily in answer to David Tamkin's comments). 714/619 in California was in 1982 713/409 in Texas was in 1983 (my list appearing in telecom had these) When was 404/912 done? I had never heard of that one before. Does anyone in Bellcore know about the splits occurring before 305/904 in 1965? No, 214 area DOES have N0X/N1X prefixes, although these may be limited to Dallas area rather than popping up in distant places like Tyler and Texarkana. Also, 415 did prepare for N0X/N1X (I have not yet come across any such prefixes, however). Earlier mail to telecom said that the inter-areacode local calls in DC area will be TEN (not eleven) digits, where the leading 1+ is left off. Toll calls require the leading 1+. I called this an areacode split because area code 202 is being reduced to DC proper (to allow for previously-forbidden prefix duplication), and will no longer be available for suburban points. -Carl Moore