Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rutgers!dptg!att!chinet!ignatz
From: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Good Suggestion from Jonathan there!!!!
Summary: Actually, make 'tag' orthogonal..
Keywords: elm tag
Message-ID: <9705@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 29 Sep 89 21:22:37 GMT
References: <1169@ispi.UUCP> <440@hades.OZ>
Reply-To: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 9

While discussing 'tag', frankly it would make sense to make it orthogonal for
all reasonable commands--i.e., all tagged messages are forwarded, bounced,
saved, deleted, etc.  This would make handling classes of messages a *lot*
easier!

		Dave Ihnat
		Analysts International Corporation
		ignatz@homebru.chi.il.us (preferred return address)
		ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us