Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!pyramid!bjb
From: bjb@pyramid.pyramid.com (Bruce Beare)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Problem with LSC 4.0 debugger.
Message-ID: <86232@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 2 Oct 89 17:38:44 GMT
References: <85031@pyramid.pyramid.com> <244@dbase.UUCP> <1989Sep29.032130.24399@NCoast.ORG> <267@dbase.UUCP>
Reply-To: bjb@pyramid.pyramid.com (Bruce Beare)
Distribution: na
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 24

In article <267@dbase.UUCP> awd@dbase.UUCP (Alastair Dallas) writes:
>
>I'm taking all kinds of heat from this group for flaming the first
>guy who posted that the THINK C debugger should display (and modify)
>the automatic variables of caller's stack frames.  I was jerk--I thought
>the fellow that made this request didn't understand scope of reference.
>
>One peculiar phenomenon has been private e-hatemail.  When you post to
>the net that this or that idea is stupid, let's face it, you're trying
>to look smart to your peers.  Second, you're educating people, but my

Alastair,
  Here you go again... It seems to me that you have a bad habit of mixing
fact, opinion and emotion together in public postings. My reading of this
last posting implies that I am one of those people that are trying to look
smart to their peers. 

I believe that in my original posting in this thread I made my purpose
quite clear. I want to insure that Think gets the message loud and 
clear - improve the debugger.

A word of advice... think before you type.

Bruce