Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!cambridge.apple.com!alms
From: alms@cambridge.apple.com (Andrew L. M. Shalit)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Left in Dust? (was: Adobe Type Manager)
Message-ID: 
Date: 25 Sep 89 19:23:05 GMT
References: <15514@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1179@adobe.UUCP> <459@amanue.UUCP>
	<20020@usc.edu> <1211@cbnewse.ATT.COM> <5068@ubc-cs.UUCP>
	<4312@internal.Apple.COM> <1989Sep23.021909.8835@NCoast.ORG>
Sender: news@cambridge.apple.com
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 18
In-reply-to: allbery@NCoast.ORG's message of 23 Sep 89 02:19:09 GMT

In article <1989Sep23.021909.8835@NCoast.ORG> allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) writes:


   But in my posting that started this thread, my complaint was that I CAN NOW
   GET THE EQUIVALENT TECHNOLOGY FOR LESS from others.  It's not as nice, but
   what makes it nice -- the software -- is not the expensive part.

Software is the expensive part.  Otherwise everyone would have software
as good as the Mac's.  But, companies like Atari and Commadore charge
so little for their computers that they can't afford system software
development.  (Don't ask me why Microsoft/IBM can't do it.  It's certainly
not for lack of resources.)

Apple doesn't sell the Finder and all the other system software.  They
have to make their money off the hardware sales.

  -andrew