Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!bionet!agate!eos!eugene
From: eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Re: Communicating DSP Equations (was: Re: DSP textbook)
Message-ID: <5258@eos.UUCP>
Date: 27 Sep 89 17:31:51 GMT
References:  <1989Sep24.032009.11720@utzoo.uucp> <473@ctycal.UUCP>
Reply-To: eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Calif.
Lines: 22

Sorry, I voted for, and wanted to read about DSP.  Not about
formatter wars.  I thought editor wars were bad.  Sorry I had to
inject this non-DSP related thing.  Sure it's a loss.  There is
an real incentive to dump vt100s, 3270s, what ever!  Think about.
What are you doing at such a backward company? Second, news
had better start thinking about the exchange of imagery and Lo!
sound [hey wait a minute, ain't that DSP?].  If you guys can't start to
agree on stuff in the BACKGROUND (RFPs, RFCs, RFIs), then theres
no hope for news.  Hey, Etherphones (tm) exist, the BSD talk(1) and VMS
phone programs are DUMB.  And people are worried about HDTV? Gawd!
you guys are your own worst enemies (Detroit on the net).

Tell me when you start discussing real DSP.  I'll resubscribe then.

Another gross generalization from

--eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov
  resident cynic at the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
  "You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?"
  "If my mail does not reach you, please accept my apology."
  {ncar,decwrl,hplabs,uunet}!ames!eugene
  				Live free or die.