Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!mcgill-vision!clyde!maxwell!timl From: timl@maxwell.Concordia.CA ( TIM LAPIN ) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: SuperPaint 2.0 Keywords: What the... Message-ID: <1315@clyde.Concordia.CA> Date: 27 Sep 89 20:42:45 GMT References: <734@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <26695@dhw68k.cts.com> Sender: sccs@Clyde.Concordia.CA Reply-To: timl@maxwell.Concordia.Ca ( TIM LAPIN ) Organization: Concordia University, Montreal Quebec Lines: 21 In article <26695@dhw68k.cts.com> thecloud@dhw68k.cts.com (Ken McLeod) writes: > > SuperPaint 2.0's 'PICT' format doesn't seem to be quite standard. I also >experienced quite a few crashes-while-saving, usually with files that had >a number of grouped objects in the Draw layer (between 20 and 50 individual >objects). > Needless to say, I don't use SuperPaint 2.0. Are other people experiencing >similar crashes? I haven't heard anything on the net to indicate this is a >quality-assurance blowit of Word 3 proportions, although if our experience >is typical, it would sure seem that way! > I too have problems with Superpaint 2.0. When I try to read in scanned images at 300 dpi it crashes. When I try at 200 dpi it firsts tries to re-scale the drawings then it crashes. If any one has a fix to this or a reason why I would appreciate it. -- Tim Lapin |Tel: (514) 848-7639 | My opinion is that Computer Centre |INTERNET: timl@maxwell.concordia.ca| my opinion is mine, Concordia University |BITNET: timl@vax2.concordia.ca | all mine. (Ahem)