Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!psueea!jove.cs.pdx.edu!bartonr From: bartonr@jove.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: WB 1.3.2 distribution Message-ID: <1771@psueea.UUCP> Date: 2 Oct 89 18:09:54 GMT Sender: news@psueea.UUCP Reply-To: bartonr@jove.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Portland State University; Portland OR Lines: 8 ejkst@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Eric J. Kennedy) writes: > Is the two-interlaced-one-non-interlaced-screen bug fixed in wb 1.3.2? Is this bug possibly hardware-related? I have tried to duplicate this with my A1000, but no matter what mix of interlaced and non-interlaced screens I use, I can switch between them in any order with no problems. (Not that I'm complaining.)