Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: ficc!peter@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Trapping 10333 by AT&T
Message-ID: 
Date: 25 Sep 89 06:42:19 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Lines: 6
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 408, message 6 of 9

What with all this talk of trapping 10288, I'd like to note that the
pay phones at LAX route all calls through AT&T. Is this legal? I would
hardly think that Sprint (my carrier of choice) has no access to LA!

To top it all off, the AT&T operator insisted I'd placed my call via
AT&T, and got quite rude about it.