Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!draken!d88-jwa From: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Macintosh Portable and IIci Intro Message-ID: <1760@draken.nada.kth.se> Date: 25 Sep 89 11:18:55 GMT References: <34888@apple.Apple.COM> <12031@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <34992@apple.Apple.COM> <525@cpdaux.UUCP> Reply-To: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 18 In article <525@cpdaux.UUCP> cpdaux!steve@apple.com (Steve Lemke) writes: {In article <34992@apple.Apple.COM{ chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: {}The Mac IIx was 15% faster than the Mac II. The Mac IIci is about 50% {}faster than the IIx, and if you add a cache card to that you can get up to {}50-70% *more* above that. {Cache card? Where can we get such a beast? Do we have to build one ourself? {I thought it wasn't going to be available until next year... :-) But you CAN get a video card now, and supposedly that makes the IIci faster, since the 68030 handles the video in the internal card (or, that was the impression I got. I could be wrong, of course) Happy Hacking ! h+@nada.kth.se -- Documentation is like sex: When it's good, it's fantastic, when it's bad...