Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!um-math!sharkey!cfctech!teemc!hpftc!zardoz!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!apple!netcom!hinton From: hinton@netcom.UUCP (Greg Hinton) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: uSoft/Apple and user interfaces Message-ID: <2213@netcom.UUCP> Date: 26 Aug 89 22:24:18 GMT References: <9025@cs.Buffalo.EDU> <3035@bucsb.UUCP> Reply-To: hinton@netcom.UUCP (Greg Hinton) Organization: NetCom -- San Jose, CA Lines: 14 In article <3035@bucsb.UUCP> bear@bucsb.bu.edu (Blair M. Burtan) writes: [ . . . . ] >Now the question is, can Jobs sue Apple and can Xerox sue Jobs? Lots of folks have suggested that Xerox should sue Apple, but I read in one of the many Apple/Jobs biographies (I'll try to dig up the reference if someone insists) that Xerox licensed the technology to Apple (as I recall, in exchange for Apple stock). Anyone know more about this? -- Greg Hinton INET: hinton@netcom.uucp UUCP: ...!uunet!apple!netcom!hinton