Xref: utzoo comp.lang.postscript:2637 comp.windows.news:1478 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!intercon!amanda@intercon.uu.net From: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,comp.windows.news Subject: Re: newcomer, need help with forall Message-ID: <1353@intercon.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 89 14:43:19 GMT References:<7725@pogo.WV.TEK.COM> <18978@mimsy.UUCP> Sender: news@intercon.UUCP Reply-To: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker) Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation Lines: 17 In article <18978@mimsy.UUCP>, don@brillig.umd.edu (Don Hopkins) writes: > Quite right! But you could also go: > > {en to tre fire} {0 50 translate exec} forall You can also do: {en to tre fire} {0 50 translate exec} bind forall Which will probably be marginally faster (except under NeWS, where the interpreter will do the "bind" for you by default...). -- Amanda Walker InterCon Systems Corporation -- amanda@intercon.uu.net | ...!uunet!intercon!amanda