Xref: utzoo comp.lang.postscript:2637 comp.windows.news:1478
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!intercon!amanda@intercon.uu.net
From: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,comp.windows.news
Subject: Re: newcomer, need help with forall
Message-ID: <1353@intercon.UUCP>
Date: 10 Aug 89 14:43:19 GMT
References:  <7725@pogo.WV.TEK.COM> <18978@mimsy.UUCP>
Sender: news@intercon.UUCP
Reply-To: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker)
Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation
Lines: 17

In article <18978@mimsy.UUCP>, don@brillig.umd.edu (Don Hopkins) writes:
> Quite right! But you could also go:
> 
> {en to tre fire} {0 50 translate exec} forall

You can also do:

	{en to tre fire} {0 50 translate exec} bind forall

Which will probably be marginally faster (except under NeWS, where the
interpreter will do the "bind" for you by default...).

--
Amanda Walker
InterCon Systems Corporation
--
amanda@intercon.uu.net    |    ...!uunet!intercon!amanda