Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!lll-winken!uunet!cbmvax!grr
From: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: A Plea to Mailing / News Forwarding List Maintainers
Message-ID: <7703@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 19 Aug 89 06:35:21 GMT
References: <7549@cbmvax.UUCP> <19062@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Distribution: na
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 26

In article <19062@mimsy.UUCP> steve@umiacs.umd.edu (Steve D. Miller) writes:
> 
>    If you're trying to hack headers to make sure that mail/news bounces go
> back where they belong, I'd suggest using the RFC 822 Sender:  line rather
> than Errors-To:.  The former is standard, while the latter is not.  The
> former works pretty well, too; on a large (> 500 users) mailing list I run,
> on which I put a Sender:  line in the header, submitters usually don't see
> any bounces.
> 
>    Hacking the From: line may or may not be worth it.  I don't, but that's
> just me.

I don't have any real problem with your comments, however there is some
question about which header lines survive gateways into VMS mailer(s).
I know the From: line makes it 8-).  The Sender: stuff makes sense,
however looking briefly at RFC822 didn't really reveal much about the
semantics - whether it would serve to redirect error messages or whether
it served mostly as a comment entry.  I dug around a bit in sendmail and
mostly ended up with a headache.

Happily, the problems seem to have gone away for the moment! 

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,	uucp: {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing	arpa: cbmvax!grr@uunet.uu.net
Commodore, Engineering Department	fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)