Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:7049 comp.unix.questions:15591 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!purdue!gatech!uflorida!novavax!rwright From: rwright@novavax.UUCP (Ronald K. Wright) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: HPUX->SCO Xenix UUCP PROBLEM (long) Keywords: HPUX SCO XENIX UUCP TANDY Message-ID: <1428@novavax.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 89 10:12:02 GMT References: <449@ntcsd1.UUCP> <902@sceard.COM> Reply-To: rwright@novavax.UUCP (Ronald K. Wright) Organization: Univ of Miami,Sch of Med,Dept of Path,Medical Examiners Office via Nova University novavax Lines: 26 In article <902@sceard.COM> mrm@sceard.COM (0040-M.R.Murphy) writes: In article <449@ntcsd1.UUCP> kdl@ntcsd1.UUCP (Dean Lane) writes: >Hopefully accurate summary > 386 box SCO 2.3.1 HDB talks to HP 9000/840 HP-UX 3.1 HDB > errors of the form >>kdl ntcsd1 ntcsd1N0414 (7/27-XX:XX:XX,XXX,1) BAD READ (expected 'S' got FAIL) > occur. >I've had these same symptoms occur with HP 9000/350 HP-UX 6 HDB talking to >HP 9000/8?? HP-UX HDB. I have the same problems with a Tandy 6000 (Xenix 3.2.0) to my SCO Xenix Zenith 386. expected 'S' got FAIL is its favorite log expression. I never get this from my 3B1 ATT (UNIX V.3B1) to the Zenith. All of the connections are the same and I have tried many configurations at various speeds. Any help would be appreciated. -=-=-==-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- R.K. Wright | uflorida!novavax!rwright Chief Medical Examiner | uflorida!novavax!medexam!rkw Assoc.Professor of Pathology(Univ.Miami)| allegra!novavax!medexam!rkw