Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!jdm
From: jdm@ut-emx.UUCP (Jim Meiss)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Expressionist problem
Keywords: Expressionist
Message-ID: <17021@ut-emx.UUCP>
Date: 13 Aug 89 16:50:11 GMT
References: <4896@tank.uchicago.edu> <456@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <14926@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Reply-To: jdm@euclid.Colorado.edu (James Meiss)
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 21

In article <14926@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Chang.P.Woo@dartmouth.edu (Chang P. Woo) writes:
>Or you can try Formulator by ICOM. Unlike Expressionist which evolved

>The features over Expressionist are:
>1. ability to align equations (say with the equal sign)
.....
	Expressionist 2.03 does this.....

>The features missing from Formulator are:
>1. ability to transfer equations two-way for further editing
	How can you even think of using Formulator if you can't
	change your equations after putting them in your document!


>Overall, I am very satisfied with Formulator.
>Chang P. Woo             Chang.P.Woo@dartmouth.EDU (preferred)
	
	Overall, I'm pretty satisfied with Expressionist!

	Jim Meiss
	jdm@euclid.Colorado.edu (after Aug 15)