Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Split Communities Message-ID:Date: 17 Aug 89 00:50:47 GMT Lines: 6 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 305, message 7 of 12 Recently, this digest has had an item about modifications to billing algorithm in NJ to make within-community calls local if they are other- wise long-distance. I recall hearing in this digest back in 1983-84 that some California communities wound up split by the proposed 213/818 border, which got moved for that reason (necessitating some new phone numbers); I never heard which communities were involved.