Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.dal.ca!dal1!dalnews From: dalnews@ac.dal.ca Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions Subject: Re: Signature files Message-ID: <692@ac.dal.ca> Date: 17 Aug 89 13:48:34 GMT References: <15046@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <549@buster.UUCP> <2689@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu> <691@ac.dal.ca> Lines: 18 Organisation: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada In article <691@ac.dal.ca>, dalnews@ac.dal.ca writes: > In article <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu>, > charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer) writes: >> >> Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why I should have a .sig at all? >> It would just be a repeat of the Reply-To line I suppose. > > In your case perhaps. In my case, no. I chose the DALNEWS name > because of its primrary function. I'm the only one that uses it, ^^^^^^^ Nothing worse than finding a spelling mistake the second or two after you transmit a message. Sorry folks. I've already flamed myself for it. Stuart Watson Halifax, Nova Scotia DALNEWS@AC.DAL.CA