Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Split Communities
Message-ID: 
Date: 17 Aug 89 00:50:47 GMT
Lines: 6
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 305, message 7 of 12

Recently, this digest has had an item about modifications to billing
algorithm in NJ to make within-community calls local if they are other-
wise long-distance.  I recall hearing in this digest back in 1983-84
that some California communities wound up split by the proposed 213/818
border, which got moved for that reason (necessitating some new phone
numbers); I never heard which communities were involved.