Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:15558 comp.unix.wizards:17579
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Where Goeth the Line-editing?
Message-ID: <2349@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 9 Aug 89 17:53:39 GMT
References: <7564@cbmvax.UUCP> <805@dms.UUCP>
Reply-To: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 15

>I agree that putting the editor in kernel code is ugly, however,
>since there doesn't seem to be any better way to do it without
>bringing the system to its knees, and IMHO line editing is
>absolutely required, it has to be there. Until somebody cooks
>up something better (like everybody starts using STREAMS),
>I'm going to keep using my kernel code line editor.

And even once everybody starts using STREAMS, you'll *still* keep it
(although modified for STREAMS), since streams modules run in the
kernel.

However, don't assume that there "isn't any better way to do it without
bringing the system to its knees" before trying one of the other ways;
try snarfing Ken Almquist's "atty", for instance, if you have
BSD-flavored pseudo-ttys.