Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.Huitema
From: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR (Christian Huitema)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: ISO Session Help!
Message-ID: <8908180723.AA25892@jerry.inria.fr>
Date: 18 Aug 89 07:23:26 GMT
References: <4756@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12

Viola,

The rules for SPDU concatenation are better understoud after reading
the specs of the Teletex Session (CCITT T.62). A lot of the problems
that you mention derive from a CCITT requirement to maintain a
compatibility between the single layer ISO session protocol and the two
layers (exchange + document) T.62 protocols.

Then, there is the point of major synchronisation and activity end:
should be considered as two names for the same thing.

Christian Huitema