Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.Huitema From: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR (Christian Huitema) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: ISO Session Help! Message-ID: <8908180723.AA25892@jerry.inria.fr> Date: 18 Aug 89 07:23:26 GMT References: <4756@ubc-cs.UUCP> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 12 Viola, The rules for SPDU concatenation are better understoud after reading the specs of the Teletex Session (CCITT T.62). A lot of the problems that you mention derive from a CCITT requirement to maintain a compatibility between the single layer ISO session protocol and the two layers (exchange + document) T.62 protocols. Then, there is the point of major synchronisation and activity end: should be considered as two names for the same thing. Christian Huitema