Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!flute.cs.uiuc.edu!grunwald
From: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: RAL meta-patch
Message-ID: 
Date: 16 Aug 89 22:21:44 GMT
References: 
Reply-To: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 9


I also have to admit that I didn't find the RAL patches to be any
faster than the Purdue+ V2.1 patches. I compiled using gcc-1.35.96,
and had -DPURDUE -DRAL -DNO_SUN_CG4.

The resulting binary was bigger, and the server had some problems
(highlighted areas were retained, minor things). The may be due to
using gcc 1.35.96 (doubtful) or because I used the Purdue +2.1
patches (more likely) or because I botched the installation (doubtful).