Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!bellcore!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!srcsip!gorby!mnkonar From: mnkonar@gorby.SRC.Honeywell.COM (Murat N. Konar) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Yet another System 7.0 wishlist ite Message-ID: <27413@srcsip.UUCP> Date: 8 Aug 89 22:46:05 GMT References: <18250.24DBBD91@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG> <186@dbase.UUCP> Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM Reply-To: mnkonar@gorby.UUCP (Murat N. Konar) Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN Lines: 18 In article <186@dbase.UUCP> cy@dbase.UUCP (Cy Shuster) writes: >(request for Finder's Open, with nothing selected, invoking SFGetFile) > >It makes sense, though, just from an argument of parallelism. If Finder >is supposed to be the model application, why not? And why not have >Shutdown as a Command-Q equivalent on the File Menu, as well? I have an orthogonal (huh?) suggestion: Make SFGetFile more Finder like. Even making it more like the NeXT browser (which is not unique to the NeXT, BTW) would be an improvement. ____________________________________________________________________ Have a day. :^| Murat N. Konar Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN mnkonar@SRC.honeywell.com (internet) {umn-cs,ems,bthpyd}!srcsip!mnkonar(UUCP)