Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!iuvax!rutgers!njin!princeton!notecnirp!ahw From: ahw@notecnirp.Princeton.EDU (Arthur Watson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Results of informal vote on F-O-R S-A-L-E items Message-ID: <18660@princeton.Princeton.EDU> Date: 15 Aug 89 21:44:47 GMT References: <11590@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Reply-To: ahw@notecnirp.UUCP (Arthur Watson) Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University Lines: 21 In article <11590@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> tim@cit-vax.UUCP (Timothy L. Kay) writes: >I recently posted a request for votes regarding posting of FOR SALE >items to comp.sys.ibm.pc. > >Now, on to the vote. I received 20 replies (including one from >myself). Should FOR SALE items appear in comp.sys.ibm.pc? > > YES: 6 > NO: 14 > >How should we interpret this? Well, I read the included replies and it sure looked like YES: 4 NO: 16 to me! Perhaps the two "yes to comp.sys.ibm.pc.forsale" which seem fairly clear NO votes were considered yes. Of course since Mr Kay interprets 6 yes and 14 no votes to mean a result of yes for the net, he'd probably do the same with 4 yes and 16 no. :-) -Arthur