Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!endor!siegel From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: THINK Class Library Questions Keywords: THINK C Message-ID: <2462@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 18 Aug 89 00:02:02 GMT References: <480@lloyd.camex.uucp> <1989Aug17.075500.9811@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec Language Products Group Lines: 33 In article <1989Aug17.075500.9811@agate.berkeley.edu> fjlim@garnet.berkeley.edu () writes: >In article <480@lloyd.camex.uucp> kent@lloyd.UUCP (Kent Borg) writes: > >>4) Is there a way to have some objects compile with 68020/68881 code, >>but not others? Use libraries? I am imagining two versions of the >>same object, one does SANE calls, one calls the 68881/2 directly. Or, >>some objects might use 68020 instructions, with a 68000 version also >>there. Would decide which types to create at initialization time. > You could use libraries, but mixed-mode projects are still tricky. I'd recommend two separate versions of the same program, each with its own compile settings. >>6) Might you folks ever port this object library to other platforms, >>or is the very idea too revolting? It's not a revolting idea, but I can't comment on the likelihood. (Company policy, you know. :-)) --Rich ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rich Siegel Staff Software Developer Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel "When it comes to my health, I think of my body as a temple - or at least a moderately well-managed Presbyterian youth center." - Emo Phillips ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~