Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!zardoz!dhw68k!david From: david@dhw68k.cts.com (David H. Wolfskill) Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx Subject: Re: Hello? Anyone out there? Keywords: REXX, MVS, TSO Message-ID: <25663@dhw68k.cts.com> Date: 17 Aug 89 03:57:36 GMT References: <1428@bruce.OZ> <2759@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> <273@ccu.UManitoba.CA> <222@lotus.UUCP> Reply-To: david@dhw68k.cts.com (David H. Wolfskill) Organization: Wolfskill & Dowling residence; Anaheim, CA (USA) Lines: 19 In article <222@lotus.UUCP> paulm@lotus.UUCP (Paul Morganthall) writes: }In article <273@ccu.UManitoba.CA> ndonald@ccu.UManitoba.CA (Nick Donaldson) writes: }>Hi. Anyone know when the mvs version of rexx will be out? }My version numbers may not be perfect, but I think REXX is a standard part }TSO/E version 2.1.1 (which we run under MVS/ESA) but not part of TSO/E }1.4. I don't know if ESA is important in this equation -- I once remember }hearing that REXX would run fine on MVS/XA with TSO/E 2.1 also. Yes; REXX is a standard part of TSO/E V2 (under MVS/XA). Fair warning: there exists a certain amount of function that is missing from the initial distribution, and is alleged to be supplied via an APAR (the number of which I don't have available at the moment). david -- David H. Wolfskill uucp: ...{spsd,zardoz,felix}!dhw68k!david InterNet: david@dhw68k.cts.com