Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: What differentiates a Workstation from a PC (Re: What should GNU run on (was Re: what kinds of things . . .)) Message-ID: <5706@ficc.uu.net> Date: 15 Aug 89 23:08:41 GMT References: <20519@adm.BRL.MIL> <36370@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <5665@ficc.uu.net> <12035@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 18 In article <12035@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>, cjc@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Chris Calabrese[mav]) writes: [ regarding PCs versus workstations] > Most PC display adapter boards are simple memory maps between board > hardware and the pixels on the screen. [ but workstations have graphics processors ] Sorry, but at least one of these display boards, the Bell Tech IWS, has a separate graphics processor. Also, one rather low end PC, the Commodore Amiga, does too. On the other hand if the CPU is fast enough it can move bits around faster than a framebuffer (just ask Henry Spencer). No, you have to use some other definition. -- Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Business: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. | "The sentence I am now Personal: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-' | writing is the sentence Quote: Have you hugged your wolf today? 'U` | you are now reading"