Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!qmc-cs!jont From: jont@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Jon Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Coverage of multitasking Message-ID: <1186@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk> Date: 12 Aug 89 16:16:53 GMT References: <2592@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> Reply-To: jont@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Jon Taylor) Organization: Computer Science Dept, Queen Mary College, University of London, UK. Lines: 21 Summary: Expires: Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Keywords: gene schwartman writes > interested in it. How are you going to explain to a student that can > barely understand how to write a decent algorithm, etc.. about parallel > programming. As somebody has stated, first you crawl, then you walk, > then you run.. I would classify what you stated as a jog :-) Arguing along the lines of Bachus' attack on the Von Neumann intellectual bottleneck, it could be said that you are too fixed in your ways. Couldn't it be the case that teaching parallel programming second to sequential is putting blinkers on students. Is it not possible that by teaching them to think of parallel algorithms first you may get a whole new set of novel answers to programming problems ? Slap me around the face is you think I am dreaming. It's happened before. I can take it. Jon Taylor Dept. of Computer Science, Queen Mary College, University of London. email : jont@uk.ac.qmc.cs