Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!usc!bbn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!mica!charlie From: charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer) Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions Subject: Re: Signature files (LONG) Message-ID: <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu> Date: 17 Aug 89 07:23:54 GMT References: <15046@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <549@buster.UUCP> <2689@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> Sender: news@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu Reply-To: charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer) Organization: UW Statistics, Seattle Lines: 3 Summary: Expires: Sender: Followup-To: Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why I should have a .sig at all? It would just be a repeat of the Reply-To line I suppose.