Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:7049 comp.unix.questions:15591
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!purdue!gatech!uflorida!novavax!rwright
From: rwright@novavax.UUCP (Ronald K. Wright)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: HPUX->SCO Xenix UUCP PROBLEM (long)
Keywords: HPUX SCO XENIX UUCP TANDY
Message-ID: <1428@novavax.UUCP>
Date: 10 Aug 89 10:12:02 GMT
References: <449@ntcsd1.UUCP> <902@sceard.COM>
Reply-To: rwright@novavax.UUCP (Ronald K. Wright)
Organization: Univ of Miami,Sch of Med,Dept of Path,Medical Examiners Office via Nova University novavax
Lines: 26

In article <902@sceard.COM> mrm@sceard.COM (0040-M.R.Murphy) writes:
In article <449@ntcsd1.UUCP> kdl@ntcsd1.UUCP (Dean Lane) writes:

>Hopefully accurate summary
>  386 box SCO 2.3.1 HDB talks to HP 9000/840 HP-UX 3.1 HDB
>  errors of the form
>>kdl ntcsd1 ntcsd1N0414 (7/27-XX:XX:XX,XXX,1) BAD READ (expected 'S' got FAIL)
>  occur.

>I've had these same symptoms occur with HP 9000/350 HP-UX 6 HDB talking to
>HP 9000/8?? HP-UX HDB. 

I have the same problems with a Tandy 6000 (Xenix 3.2.0) to my SCO Xenix
Zenith 386.

expected 'S' got FAIL is its favorite log expression.  I never get
this from my 3B1 ATT (UNIX V.3B1) to the Zenith.  All of the connections 
are the same and I have tried many configurations at various speeds.

Any help would be appreciated.


-=-=-==-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
R.K. Wright 				| uflorida!novavax!rwright
Chief Medical Examiner			| uflorida!novavax!medexam!rkw
Assoc.Professor of Pathology(Univ.Miami)| allegra!novavax!medexam!rkw