Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!usc!bbn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!mica!charlie
From: charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer)
Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions
Subject: Re: Signature files (LONG)
Message-ID: <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu>
Date: 17 Aug 89 07:23:54 GMT
References: <15046@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <549@buster.UUCP> <2689@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu>
Sender: news@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu
Reply-To: charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer)
Organization: UW Statistics, Seattle
Lines: 3
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:


Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why I should have a .sig at all?
It would just be a repeat of the Reply-To line I suppose.