Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: What differentiates a Workstation from a PC (Re: What should GNU run on (was Re: what kinds of things . . .))
Message-ID: <5687@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 15 Aug 89 14:51:37 GMT
References: <20519@adm.BRL.MIL> <36370@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <5665@ficc.uu.net> <1528@convex.UUCP>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 11

In article <1528@convex.UUCP>, datri@concave.uucp (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
> Personally, I find it difficult to call something running MS-DOS with
> a fairly low-res screen a workstation.

How about something runing UNIX and X-windows with a 1K by 1K display?
That's what you'll find in high-end PCs these days.
-- 
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Business: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. | "The sentence I am now
Personal: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.   `-_-' |  writing is the sentence
Quote: Have you hugged your wolf today?  'U`  |  you are now reading"