Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!jdm From: jdm@ut-emx.UUCP (Jim Meiss) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Expressionist problem Keywords: Expressionist Message-ID: <17021@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 13 Aug 89 16:50:11 GMT References: <4896@tank.uchicago.edu> <456@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <14926@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Reply-To: jdm@euclid.Colorado.edu (James Meiss) Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 21 In article <14926@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Chang.P.Woo@dartmouth.edu (Chang P. Woo) writes: >Or you can try Formulator by ICOM. Unlike Expressionist which evolved >The features over Expressionist are: >1. ability to align equations (say with the equal sign) ..... Expressionist 2.03 does this..... >The features missing from Formulator are: >1. ability to transfer equations two-way for further editing How can you even think of using Formulator if you can't change your equations after putting them in your document! >Overall, I am very satisfied with Formulator. >Chang P. Woo Chang.P.Woo@dartmouth.EDU (preferred) Overall, I'm pretty satisfied with Expressionist! Jim Meiss jdm@euclid.Colorado.edu (after Aug 15)