Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!bionet!agate!saturn!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!laurie From: laurie@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (60648000) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: 16-bit memory, caches, and UNIX V/386 Message-ID: <8746@saturn.ucsc.edu> Date: 17 Aug 89 15:08:02 GMT References: <13274@megaron.arizona.edu> <9639@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> Sender: usenet@saturn.ucsc.edu Reply-To: laurie@ucscb.UCSC.EDU Ken Chapin Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz; CATS Lines: 11 In article <9639@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff) writes: >Does anyone have a benchmark as to what 16 bit memory does to performance >if you have a caching motherboard? I'm quite interested since it's the >only way I can add memory. I was running a AST premium 386/20 with 2.6mb of 32 bit memory. I then added a 2mb 16 bit 100 ns memory card and when running graphics programs that malloc'ed HUGE data structures (1-2 mb), my box ran about 40-60 % slower. I was really suprised at the diff. Ken Chapin