Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.dal.ca!dal1!dalnews
From: dalnews@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions
Subject: Re: Signature files
Message-ID: <692@ac.dal.ca>
Date: 17 Aug 89 13:48:34 GMT
References: <15046@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <549@buster.UUCP> <2689@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu> <691@ac.dal.ca>
Lines: 18
Organisation: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <691@ac.dal.ca>, dalnews@ac.dal.ca writes:
> In article <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu>,
>  charlie@mica.stat.washington.edu (Charlie Geyer) writes:
>> 
>> Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why I should have a .sig at all?
>> It would just be a repeat of the Reply-To line I suppose.
> 
> In your case perhaps. In my case, no. I chose the DALNEWS name
> because of its primrary function. I'm the only one that uses it,
                 ^^^^^^^

Nothing worse than finding a spelling mistake the second or two
after you transmit a message. Sorry folks. I've already flamed
myself for it.

Stuart Watson
Halifax, Nova Scotia
DALNEWS@AC.DAL.CA