Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!zardoz!dhw68k!david
From: david@dhw68k.cts.com (David H. Wolfskill)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx
Subject: Re: Hello?  Anyone out there?
Keywords: REXX, MVS, TSO
Message-ID: <25663@dhw68k.cts.com>
Date: 17 Aug 89 03:57:36 GMT
References: <1428@bruce.OZ> <2759@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> <273@ccu.UManitoba.CA> <222@lotus.UUCP>
Reply-To: david@dhw68k.cts.com (David H. Wolfskill)
Organization: Wolfskill & Dowling residence; Anaheim, CA (USA)
Lines: 19

In article <222@lotus.UUCP> paulm@lotus.UUCP (Paul Morganthall) writes:
}In article <273@ccu.UManitoba.CA> ndonald@ccu.UManitoba.CA (Nick Donaldson) writes:
}>Hi. Anyone know when the mvs version of rexx will be out?

}My version numbers may not be perfect, but I think REXX is a standard part 
}TSO/E version 2.1.1 (which we run under MVS/ESA) but not part of TSO/E
}1.4.  I don't know if ESA is important in this equation -- I once remember
}hearing that REXX would run fine on MVS/XA with TSO/E 2.1 also.

Yes; REXX is a standard part of TSO/E V2 (under MVS/XA).

Fair warning:  there exists a certain amount of function that is missing
from the initial distribution, and is alleged to be supplied via an APAR
(the number of which I don't have available at the moment).

david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill
uucp: ...{spsd,zardoz,felix}!dhw68k!david	InterNet: david@dhw68k.cts.com