Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: cattley@ntvax.uucp (Gary Cattley - CEMI) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: More About NJ Sabotage Message-ID:Date: 9 Aug 89 13:51:45 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: Center for Experimental Music and Intermedia, U. of North Texas Lines: 22 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 285, message 8 of 11 Mark Smith comments, >>Once again I ask - what are the unions trying to prove here? I can't see any >>judge or arbitrator taking the union side on anything after all of this. In article bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) responded: >Come back and report when charges are filed and the union is held >responsible for this, not when some manager at NJ Bell calls the press >to badmouth the union. Irregardless of the source of the damage to telco equipment, it seemingly is more than coincidental vandalism. I found Smith's postings informative, more for the explanation they offered for results that I got when trying to place calls to the affected area(s), than for the political interpretations. The latter, just take with proverbial salt in any posting, media source, etc. If there are more service interruptions, please continue to post. gary Gary Cattley - CEMI email: cattley@dept.csci.unt.edu or bitnet id48@vaxb.acs.unt.edu