Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sco!davidbe
From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION - modification of charter for news.announce.newgroups
Message-ID: <5004@viscous.sco.COM>
Date: 14 Aug 89 16:33:36 GMT
References: <3960@ncar.ucar.edu=  <629@sequoia.UUCP> <03Vo02th4a=301@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
Sender: news@sco.COM
Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Organization: The Safeway Clergy Onslaught
Lines: 20

I don't mind if n.a.n posts the newgroup messages.  Indeed, it's handy for
those people who don't read control to find out what groups they're missing
at their site.

I don't, however, want to see n.a.n cluttered with calls for discussion...
especially when the given hierarchy doesn't necessarily need one.

So keep the creation (and removal) messages as a public service, but have
that be about all.

						or am I the only 
						person to whom that 
						sounds reasonable?

-- 
David Bedno, Systems Administrator, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Email: davidbe@sco.COM / ..!{uunet,sun,ucbvax!ucscc,gorn}!sco!davidbe 
Phone: 408-425-7222 x5123 Disclaimer: Speaking from SCO but not for SCO.  

Taste me!  Taste me!  I'm organic!				- The Bobs