Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: asuvax!gtephx!ellisond@ncar.ucar.edu (Dell Ellison)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Correction of Telco Name
Message-ID: 
Date: 9 Aug 89 02:55:15 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona
Lines: 17
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 282, message 9 of 9

In article , TK0GRM2%NIU.BITNET@uicvm.uic.edu writes:
> Patrick - just to clarify a message that somebody posted about
> a non-numeric phone number in Utah  (sorry I don't know who..old
> digests are auto-purged after they are read).  The BOC for Utah
> is Mountain Bell. (not Utah Bell).
> -=->G<-=-
>
> [Moderator's Note: You're right. Sorry, I missed that one myself.  PT]

I don't know.
I thought that Mountain Bell is now going by the parent name of U.S. West?

[Moderator's Note: Well, that too. But Mountain Bell is the way the customers
think of it, I imagine. We here in Chicago are variously known as Ameritech
or Illinois Bell, depending on who you ask. If you ask David Tamkin, of
course he would say Centel, since they have that one little dinky corner
of Chicago, along with Park Ridge and Des Plaines, IL.   PT]