Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: cattley@ntvax.uucp (Gary Cattley - CEMI)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: More About NJ Sabotage
Message-ID: 
Date: 9 Aug 89 13:51:45 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Organization: Center for  Experimental Music and Intermedia, U. of North Texas
Lines: 22
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 285, message 8 of 11

Mark Smith comments,
>>Once again I ask - what are the unions trying to prove here?  I can't see any
>>judge or arbitrator taking the union side on anything after all of this.

In article  bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (Barry
Shein) responded:
>Come back and report when charges are filed and the union is held
>responsible for this, not when some manager at NJ Bell calls the press
>to badmouth the union.

Irregardless of the source of the damage to telco equipment, it seemingly
is more than coincidental vandalism.  I found Smith's postings informative,
more for the explanation they offered for results that I got when trying
to place calls to the affected area(s), than for the political interpretations.
The latter, just take with proverbial salt in any posting, media source, etc.
If there are more service interruptions, please continue to post.

					gary

Gary Cattley - CEMI
email: cattley@dept.csci.unt.edu
or bitnet id48@vaxb.acs.unt.edu