Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: ben@sybase.com (ben ullrich) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Sprint Bashing Should Stop! Message-ID:Date: 17 Aug 89 18:05:00 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: sybase, inc., emeryville, ca. Lines: 24 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 306, message 3 of 5 In article , rick@uunet.uu.net (Rick Adams) writes: > > Chances are your Sprint rep friend will tell you they do not have 'call > > supervision equipment' and cannot tell when the call actually starts. PT] > Sprint claims that they have call supervision equipment in all areas that > offer equal access. > Why the continuing Sprint bashing? They aren't nearly as half-assed as > you seem determined to present them. How are they not half-assed?? Unless you give good reasons for the ``bashing'' to stop, there will be no motivation to do so. And ``Claims'' by Sprint are no better than any ``bashing.'' Let's see some real answers. ...ben ---- ben ullrich consider my words disclaimed,if you consider them at all sybase, inc., emeryville, ca "When you deal with human beings, a certain +1 (415) 596 - 3500 amount of nonsense is inevitable." -- mike trout ben@sybase.com {pyramid,pacbell,sun,lll-tis}!sybase!ben