Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mtxinu!shore From: shore@mtxinu.COM (Melinda Shore) Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions Subject: Re: Signature files (LONG) Message-ID: <940@mtxinu.UUCP> Date: 19 Aug 89 18:03:14 GMT References: <2182@uw-entropy.ms.washington.edu> <73.UUL1.3#5131@mvac23.UUCP> Reply-To: shore@mtxinu.UUCP (Melinda Shore) Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley Lines: 24 [I generally try to avoid doing this kind of thing, but this one was too good to pass up ... ] In article <73.UUL1.3#5131@mvac23.UUCP> mvac23!thomas@udel.edu writes: >Summary: ADD a .sig with your e-mail addresses for as many networks as > you know (within reason, of course ;-). > - tom >============================================================================== >Internet: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu | Notice: System > or | will be going down > mvac23%thomas@udel.edu | at 4:45pm today for ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >uucp: {ucbvax,mcvax,psuvax1,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas| a disk crash. >Location: Newark, DE, USA | >============================================================================== Those who give advice about network addressing really ought to take care that the addresses with which they insist on littering up their .signature files are correct. Note that the second address, had it been correct, would not have added information anyway. Also note that the quote, the lines of "=", and the obscene number of blanks don't help anyone get mail to you. -- Melinda Shore shore@mtxinu.com Mt Xinu ..!uunet!mtxinu.com!shore