Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: ben@sybase.com (ben ullrich)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Sprint Bashing Should Stop!
Message-ID: 
Date: 17 Aug 89 18:05:00 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Organization: sybase, inc., emeryville, ca.
Lines: 24
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 306, message 3 of 5

In article ,
	rick@uunet.uu.net (Rick Adams) writes:

> > Chances are your Sprint rep friend will tell you they do not have 'call
> > supervision equipment' and cannot tell when the call actually starts.  PT]

> Sprint claims that they have call supervision equipment in all areas that
> offer equal access.

> Why the continuing Sprint bashing? They aren't nearly as half-assed as
> you seem determined to present them.

How are they not half-assed??  Unless you give good reasons for the
``bashing'' to stop, there will be no motivation to do so.  And
``Claims'' by Sprint are no better than any ``bashing.''  Let's see
some real answers.


 ...ben
----
ben ullrich	       consider my words disclaimed,if you consider them at all
sybase, inc., emeryville, ca	"When you deal with human beings, a certain
+1 (415) 596 - 3500	       amount of nonsense is inevitable." -- mike trout
ben@sybase.com			       {pyramid,pacbell,sun,lll-tis}!sybase!ben