Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: bnr-fos!bnr-public!davem@watmath.waterloo.edu (Dave Mielke)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: He loves me, He loves me not, He loves me, He...
Message-ID: 
Date: 12 Aug 89 02:15:38 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 66
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu


In article  laic!vogon.laic!darin@decwrl.dec.com (Darin Johnson) writes:
>1) God knows what our eventual fate is because God is omniscient, not
>   because it was 'decided'.  God can see the future, so he automatically
>   knows if we are saved or not (unless God makes a special effort to
>   not know this, which I doubt).  However, at the present time, we may
>   not have made that choice for ourselves.  God has not told us what
>   our individual fate is, so we act no differently.

This position assumes that God is a mere observer, i.e. He does not
intervene in our affairs. The Scriptures are, however, full of cases
where He has directly intervened. We must remember that God can, with
perfect foreknowledge, intervene in such a way as to make things turn
out in the way that He wants them to.
 
Even if the concept of a person having the free will to either accept
or reject God were true, there is still no way to avoid the fact that
God has to involve Himself with each person who is to even stand a
chance of being saved. John 6:44 begins "No man can come to me, except
the Father which hath sent me draw him:".
 
>   As an analogy, suppose you had a machine to see into the future.  You
>   saw that your child would run away from home and lead a life of crime.
>   However, at the moment, your child is 3 years old.  Your child has
>   not abandoned you yet.  Do you love him/her less?  What would you do
>   in this case?  Would you let your child know that he/she is going to
>   mess up in the future?

There are a couple of Scriptural problems with this theory.
 
The Scriptures teach that we have abandoned God as of the time we are
conceived. Psalm 58:3-5 says "The wicked are estranged from the womb:
they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison
{is} like the poison of a serpent: {they are} like the deaf adder
{that} stoppeth her ear; Which will not hearken to the voice of
charmers, charming never so wisely.". In case anyone wants to fault me
for having said "from conception" when this Scripture implies "from
actual birth", I would also like to quote Psalm 51:5 which says
"Behold, I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive
me.".
 
You have assumed that God considers all of us to be His children. There
is no Scriptural support for this idea other than the leap in logic
that says that we must be because He created Adam, because we are all
descendants of Adam, and because He must have considered Adam to be a
child of His. What the Scriptures actually teach is that we become His
children at the point when we become saved. John 1:12 says "But as many
as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God,
{even} to them that believe on his name:".
 
Please understand that I have not chosen to respond to you in this way
so as to give you a hard time. I, in fact, rarely even look at who
originated each article until afterward so that I can insure that my
response is not biased. This has given me an opportunity, though, to
illustrate the dangers of coming up with a nice sounding theory that is
very convincing yet cannot be supported by the Scriptures. I'm sure
that we all agree that the best way to get to accurately know God is to
let Him describe Himself to us through His Word. I, personally, would
like to see Scripture references that support any given position. This
is the only way to insure that we are speaking with even a minute
degree of authority.
 
    Dave Mielke, 613-726-0014
    856 Grenon Avenue
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    K2B 6G3