Xref: utzoo news.groups:11620 news.admin:6586
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: Designated counters
Message-ID: <1989Aug16.062825.1746@twwells.com>
Date: 16 Aug 89 06:28:25 GMT
References: <5554@ficc.uu.net>
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 21

In article <5554@ficc.uu.net>, jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes:
: Let me reiterate: the idea for a designated vote counter is a good
: one.  Bill, reassert yourself.

I'm back. My apartment was flooded and my computer damaged. But all
is well now, except that I'm over a week behind in answering anything.

Anyway, to repeat my earlier message: if anyone wants someone to run
a vote, because they don't know how to or can't do it, are not well
connected, or whatever, I'll be happy to run it from my machine. I've
run a vote once before and don't have any problems with doing it
again.

It might be a good idea if Greg were to put a list of people who are
willing to count votes into his monthly postings on
news.announce.newgroups. I do *not* think that it is a good idea that
votes be required to be taken by someone in that list.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com