Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!titan!preston From: preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: What I'd really like to see in an if-statement... Message-ID: <545@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 11 Aug 89 02:27:55 GMT References: <8577@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <14251@haddock.ima.isc.com> <516@brazos.Rice.edu> <8606@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Sender: root@rice.edu Reply-To: preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) Organization: Rice University, Houston Lines: 20 In article <8606@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> lacey@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (John Lacey) writes: >In article <516@brazos.Rice.edu> (3383 of comp.lang.misc) > preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) writes: >} but >} a} or a < (b < c) > >Just because the expression doesn't commute or associate doesn't mean >it is not a valid relation. But if < doesn't associate, then it doesn't make sense to write a