Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: smk@attunix.att.com (S M Krieger)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: More About NJ Sabotage
Message-ID: 
Date: 13 Aug 89 16:02:48 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Organization: Summit NJ
Lines: 21
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 294, message 8 of 10

In article , msmith@topaz.rutgers.edu
(Mark Robert Smith) writes:
> In article  bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (Barry
> Shein) writes:
>
> > How do you even know there was *any* sabotage? Because some phone
> > service got disrupted and the phone co blamed it on the strikers?
> > Maybe, maybe not.
>
All I know is that my daughter's phone line went dead (not even any power
to the phone) last Sunday, she got service restored Monday afternoon,
and for about three days, there was work going on at a cross-connection
box in New Providence, NJ about 0.9 miles away from my home.

And, unless it's really media manipulation, one of the "incidents"
that the Newark Star Ledger reported was damage to a telephone box
in New Providence that affected 400 subscribers.
--
Stan Krieger
Summit, NJ
 ...!att!attunix!smk