Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!bellcore!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!srcsip!gorby!mnkonar
From: mnkonar@gorby.SRC.Honeywell.COM (Murat N. Konar)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Yet another System 7.0 wishlist ite
Message-ID: <27413@srcsip.UUCP>
Date: 8 Aug 89 22:46:05 GMT
References: <18250.24DBBD91@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG> <186@dbase.UUCP>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM
Reply-To: mnkonar@gorby.UUCP (Murat N. Konar)
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN
Lines: 18

In article <186@dbase.UUCP> cy@dbase.UUCP (Cy Shuster) writes:
>(request for Finder's Open, with nothing selected, invoking SFGetFile)
>
>It makes sense, though, just from an argument of parallelism.  If Finder
>is supposed to be the model application, why not?  And why not have
>Shutdown as a Command-Q equivalent on the File Menu, as well?

I have an orthogonal (huh?) suggestion:  Make SFGetFile more Finder like.
Even making it more like the NeXT browser (which is not unique to the NeXT,
BTW) would be an improvement.




____________________________________________________________________
Have a day. :^|
Murat N. Konar        Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN
mnkonar@SRC.honeywell.com (internet) {umn-cs,ems,bthpyd}!srcsip!mnkonar(UUCP)