Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!cica!gatech!udel!mmdf From: OHA101%URIACC.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu (F. Michael Theilig) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Go-Amigo Message-ID: <21464@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 11 Aug 89 01:31:52 GMT Lines: 33 Michael Portuesi said: > >Do you have a good reason for preferring the 1084 over the 1080? The >1080 is a much nicer monitor than the 1084, and over the past year or >two this newsgroup has been averaging about one 1084 horror story per >month (dead monitors, arcing, fire and brimstone shooting out the >back, etc. etc.). I've had my 1080 since fall of 1986 with no >problems whatsoever. > Someone emailed me saying that many believe the 1080 to be superior. My reasons were: a) I was told the 1084 had a sharper immage. I have never seen one up close. b) It would have been 3 years newer. c) More professional style. I haven't had many problems with my 1080. I *THOUGHT* the 1084 was better. >Note that these comments do not apply to the 1084-S, which is really a >stereo version of the 1080 that happens to go under the 1084 name. > > Interesting ... I didn't know that ... Doesn't the 1804-S have a problem of burning up? A friend of mine had one that died just out of warentee. > --M > >-- >Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Inc. > portuesi@SGI.COM /* F. Michael Theilig OHA101 at URIACC.Bitnet "There is no Dark Side in the Moon, really ... matter of fact it's all dark." */