Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!rit!tropix!moscom!ur-valhalla!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!rutgers!gatech!ncar!ames!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Overloading operators in Fortran 8x
Message-ID: <8244@boring.cwi.nl>
Date: 8 Aug 89 00:14:12 GMT
References: <669hallidayd@yvax.byu.edu>
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 16


 In article <666hallidayd@yvax.byu.edu> hallidayd@yvax.byu.edu writes:
 
 >Here is a list of some of the comment forms used by some present
 >programming languages and comments on whether they may be useful in the
 >context of Fortran, particularly with operator definition capability of the
 >general kind found in Macsyma (the only language that allows such
 >definition to go beyond overloading predefined operators---Ada's
 >restriction):
 >
Note that also Algol 68 allows general operator definition (in fact the
number of potential operators in Algol 68 is infinite).
-- 
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
INTERNET   : dik@cwi.nl
BITNET/EARN: dik@mcvax