Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!cbmvax!ditto
From: ditto@cbmvax.UUCP (Michael "Ford" Ditto)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: how do I tell the size of a pseudoterm window?
Summary: Layers & X both need "connections" between clients and server
Keywords: layers xt
Message-ID: <5461@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 8 Dec 88 22:41:48 GMT
References: <2081@vedge.UUCP> <6766@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <564@auspex.UUCP> <9047@smoke.BRL.MIL> <577@auspex.UUCP> <5445@cbmvax.UUCP> <594@auspex.UUCP>
Reply-To: ditto@cbmvax.UUCP (Michael "Ford" Ditto)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 26

In article <594@auspex.UUCP> guy@auspex.UUCP (Guy Harris) writes:
[ about a layers terminal ]
> [ ... ] the
>question is whether programs on other machines on the network can use
>that terminal in the same way that programs on that machine can, in the
>same way programs using X can run either on the machine on which the
>display server is running (assuming it's not just an "X terminal" not
>set up to run applications) or on any machine that can be *logically*
>connected, via some kind of network connection, to that machine.

The big question is just whether those other machines can establish
a logical connection to the layers terminal.  The standard layers
software doesn't include a TCP gateway or anything like it, so normally,
the answer is no.  But there isn't anything inherent in the layers spec
that prevents such support from being written.

I think the "superiority" of X over layers in this respect is entirely
due to the transport mechanisms they normally use; the windowing
systems themselves are equally suitable for network use.
-- 
					-=] Ford [=-

"The number of Unix installations	(In Real Life:  Mike Ditto)
has grown to 10, with more expected."	ford@kenobi.cts.com
- The Unix Programmer's Manual,		...!sdcsvax!crash!elgar!ford
  2nd Edition, June, 1972.		ditto@cbmvax.commodore.com