Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!xanth!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!bywater!acheron!clarke
From: clarke@acheron.UUCP (Ed Clarke)
Newsgroups: news.sysadmin
Subject: Valid groups?
Message-ID: <387@acheron.UUCP>
Date: 4 Dec 88 18:15:30 GMT
Lines: 13

I've just been cleaning up my 'active' file and have come up with a few
groups that look valid, but are not found in the checkgroups.inet from Gene 
Spafford.  Are these new ( since 12 Nov 88 ), bogus or should they go into
another category ( like gnu, pubnet, alt )?  Doesn't spaf coordinate 'comp'?

comp.archives
comp.lang.sigplan
comp.sys.ibm.pc.net

And I'm not even going to ask about 'alt.weemba.sheep' ...
-- 
Ed Clarke
uunet!bywater!acheron!clarke