Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!uvaarpa!babbage!mac3n
From: mac3n@babbage.acc.virginia.edu (Alex Colvin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Sucessful Languages (was: Algol-68 down for the count)
Summary: pascal's design goals, Algol-68R
Message-ID: <430@babbage.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: 2 Dec 88 14:42:25 GMT
References: <388@ubbpc.UUCP> <16187@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <599@quintus.UUCP> <10085@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 14

The stated design goals for Pascal changed several times from the first
articles in 71 to later articles.  They pretty much match the prevalent use
at the time.

It is probably correct that Pascal was the true sucessor to Algol 60.

As to Algol-68, no "serious" language design since has ignored it.  Its
influence is felt not so much in use as in subsequent languages.  I'm
thinking of Ada's "elaborations", C's "union"s & "structs" and (pseudo)-
regular treatment of pointers, that awful word "pragma".  The Informal
Introduction was an early instance of hypertext.  There was a SIGPLAN
article once, "Ignorance of Algol 68 Considered Harmful".

Then there's CPL, not to mention ISWIM...