Xref: utzoo comp.ai:2778 talk.philosophy.misc:1668
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!apple!bionet!agate!gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu
From: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.ai,talk.philosophy.misc
Subject: Papal bull about infinity
Message-ID: <17723@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 3 Dec 88 09:24:15 GMT
References: <1919@garth.UUCP> <2671@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <1923@garth.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Followup-To: talk.philosophy.misc
Organization: Garnet Gang Gems of Wisdom, Inc.
Lines: 13
In-reply-to: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)

In article <1923@garth.UUCP>, smryan@garth (Steven Ryan) writes:

>Without wanting to start a jihad, but in most math and computer
>science, there is a real attempt to avoid the word `infinity' and
>`infinite' really is restricted to `infinite set.'

  I don't know about computer science, but the Pope already told
you that you are wrong wrong wrong-o about mathematics, and gave
examples. If you can't trust the Pope, whom can you trust?
--
ucbvax!garnet!gsmith    Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
Logicians are apt to call this an *argumentum ad hominem*.  Quite so: ..
I am addressing *humans*.  I am addressing neither dogs nor logicians.