Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK!PVR%bgerug51.earn From: PVR%bgerug51.earn@NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK (Patrick Van Renterghem / Transputer Lab) Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: Parsytec (Once More) Keywords: > B-9710 Ghent-Zwijnaarde, Belgium, Europe. Fax: +32 91 22 85 9 Message-ID: <8811290921.AA26938@uk.ac.ox.prg> Date: 28 Nov 88 18:23:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 13 I received no decent answers to my "Parsytec incompatibility questions". Just to remind you, my first question was about the library format and what Inmos exactly changed (e.g. headers). The second question was about the debugger, but takes larger proportions than that. As Parsytec does not use the same reset scheme and no analyse at all, the debugger, 3L Parallel C compiler, ... can not reset/analyse the transputers in a network of Parsytec boards. Are we condemned to wait for a new release from Parsytec, or is there a solution. If you have one, would you be so kind to let me know? Has anyone good/bad experiences with Microway Quadputer/T800 ? Patrick (pvr @ bgerug51 on bitnet)