Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4045 comp.lang.c++:2150 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!intek01!mark From: mark@intek01.UUCP (Mark McWiggins) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Is Xenix 386 C as broken as Xenix 286 C? Keywords: C++ Message-ID: <372@intek01.UUCP> Date: 1 Dec 88 02:19:15 GMT Organization: Intek, Inc., Bellevue WA Lines: 15 We intend to become a C++ shop. We have the C++ source and would like C++ to run on our primary development environments, Unix and DOS. But Xenix 286 C will not compile some of C++'s output; the compiler crashes with a segmentation violation. It also gives the infamous "infinite spill" message on complicated expressions that the DOS C's seem able to handle. Is the 386 version any better? Specifically, do you have AT&T C++ working with it? Thanks in advance for any insight. -- Mark McWiggins UUCP: uunet!intek01!mark DISCLAIMER: I could be wrong. INTERNET: intek01!mark@uunet.uu.net (206) 455-9935