Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!xanth!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!bywater!acheron!clarke From: clarke@acheron.UUCP (Ed Clarke) Newsgroups: news.sysadmin Subject: Valid groups? Message-ID: <387@acheron.UUCP> Date: 4 Dec 88 18:15:30 GMT Lines: 13 I've just been cleaning up my 'active' file and have come up with a few groups that look valid, but are not found in the checkgroups.inet from Gene Spafford. Are these new ( since 12 Nov 88 ), bogus or should they go into another category ( like gnu, pubnet, alt )? Doesn't spaf coordinate 'comp'? comp.archives comp.lang.sigplan comp.sys.ibm.pc.net And I'm not even going to ask about 'alt.weemba.sheep' ... -- Ed Clarke uunet!bywater!acheron!clarke