Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!tozz From: tozz@hpindda.HP.COM (Bob Tausworthe) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Addressing in ISO Message-ID: <5560009@hpindda.HP.COM> Date: 6 Dec 88 08:11:52 GMT Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA Lines: 22 I am writing this note in an effort to obtain some information on the addressing strategies employed by different organizations in their ISO networking products. The areas I'm concerned with are: - CONS vs CLNP. How are you making the decision? - ES-IS protocol. Are you implementing it on ES systems? - first hop decisions for ESs. are you statically configuring this information? - CLNP over X.25. What addressing methods do you support. - TPvsCLNP SAP identifier in Call User Data - Subaddressing - Extended address facility I would appreciate any information people have on this subject, as well as any new information people may have about NBS, and/or GOSIP conformance. I am also interested in how some companies may be addressing (no pun intended) these problems. thanx in advance tozz@hpinddu.hp.com