Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!pasteur!agate!saturn!kjell From: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu (Kjell Post) Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme Subject: Re: Lisp vs. Scheme Emacs Message-ID: <5621@saturn.ucsc.edu> Date: 2 Dec 88 06:42:46 GMT References: <237@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP> <82000004@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu> Reply-To: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu (Kjell Post) Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz Lines: 13 In article <82000004@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu> wilson@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu writes: > >On the other hand, in Stallman's paper on EMACS, he says that it >exploits dynamic binding for flexibility. How can a *bug* be considered flexible? (Boy, am I in trouble now...) -- For athletes and programmers, ! Kjell E. Post a woman is the end of their career. ! CIS/CE ! University of California, Santa Cruz -- A.Wickberg ! Email: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu