Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!pasteur!agate!saturn!kjell
From: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu (Kjell Post)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re: Lisp vs. Scheme Emacs
Message-ID: <5621@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Date: 2 Dec 88 06:42:46 GMT
References: <237@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP> <82000004@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu>
Reply-To: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu (Kjell Post)
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz
Lines: 13

In article <82000004@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu> wilson@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu writes:
>
>On the other hand, in Stallman's paper on EMACS, he says that it
>exploits dynamic binding for flexibility.

How can a *bug* be considered flexible?

(Boy, am I in trouble now...)
-- 
      For athletes and programmers,  ! Kjell E. Post
a woman is the end of their career.  ! CIS/CE
                                     ! University of California, Santa Cruz
              -- A.Wickberg          ! Email: kjell@saturn.ucsc.edu