Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!vector!nobody From: munnari!stcns3.stc.oz.au!dave@uunet.UU.NET (Dave Horsfall) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Telephone restrictors Message-ID:Date: 5 Dec 88 04:37:14 GMT Sender: chip@vector.UUCP Lines: 14 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 8, issue 194, message 2 In article dgc@math.ucla.edu writes: | | 5. When the battery goes dead (which happens with no warning) it stops | restricting. It would be better if a dead battery disabled outgoing | calls. Ummm... I would be just a little bit annoyed if I couldn't make an emergency out-going call, just because of a stupid flat battery! This sounds like RISKS material. -- Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU), Alcatel-STC Australia, dave@stcns3.stc.oz dave%stcns3.stc.oz.AU@uunet.UU.NET, ...munnari!stcns3.stc.oz.AU!dave PCs haven't changed computing history - merely repeated it