Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!gatech!udel!princeton!phoenix!zimerman From: zimerman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Jacob Ben-david Zimmerman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac II recommendation Keywords: PMMU, confused... Message-ID: <4717@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 5 Dec 88 20:44:25 GMT References: <595@cadillac.CAD.MCC.COM> <71934@felix.UUCP> <389@eutrc3.UUCP> <73358@felix.UUCP> Reply-To: zimerman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Jacob Ben-david Zimmerman) Organization: Princeton University, NJ Lines: 16 Okay. I asked this question before, and got a clear answer, but this recent discussion has confused me again. Shirley Kehr (sp?) says that she was told that future MacOS releases might use the PMMU in the Mac IIx, so she should get that and not worry about having to upgrade a Mac II. Now, I was told that the Mac II has a slot for the 68851 PMMU; would this be the 'upgrade' that other folk are talking about? If the MacOS does indeed begin to utilize a PMMU, would a 68851 stuck in a Mac II fill the bill? Thanks all... -JBZimmerman! -- ___________ | "A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut || | with no holes is a danish." || ||acob Zimmerman!+>INTERNET === | BITnet