Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!mailrus!ames!killer!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: 32-bit LUCAS memory board Message-ID: <3035@sugar.uu.net> Date: 30 Nov 88 12:41:00 GMT References: <3414@utastro.UUCP> <5349@cbmvax.UUCP> Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston, TX Lines: 20 In article <5349@cbmvax.UUCP>, daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes: > in article <3414@utastro.UUCP>, sjk@utastro.UUCP (Scot Kleinman) says: > > The only problem with not making the memory autoconfig would be when using > > it (or wanting to use it) with disks that need to be booted... > The ONLY kind of programs that create this kind of situation are poorly > programmed video games [...] you're probably better off not doing > the configuration. I'll second this. I have 4 Meg of non-autoconfig memory in my machine and I'm glad of it. If I want to run some PC-ware junk that requires a boot, I can boot it without losing RAD: and VD0:. It's debatable whether "poorly programmed" or "callously designed" is a better description for games like this, by the way. -- Peter da Silva `-_-' peter@sugar.uu.net Have you hugged U your wolf today? Disclaimer: My typos are my own damn busines#!rne