Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!gatech!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!blake!ogccse!littlei!intelisc!omepd!mipos3!pinkas
From: pinkas@hobbit.intel.com (Israel Pinkas ~)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Return receipt
Message-ID: 
Date: 30 Nov 88 18:56:29 GMT
Sender: news@mipos3.intel.com
Distribution: comp
Organization: Corporate CAD, INTeL Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 36


My group is interested in implementing some form of mail delivery
notification.  I would be interested in finding out if there is any
standard for this.  I remember some discussion in one of the newsgroups
about a Return-receipt: header as an extension to RFC822, but I do not
remember what was resolved.

If anybody has implemented this, I would be interested in finding out the
following:

1) How is the remote sendmail notified that it should send a reply?

2) Beyond the obvious change in the local mail delivery, which sends the
reply, were any other changes necessary?

3) How does the user let the local sendmail know that s/he would like to be
notified of delivery?


On a related note, has anybody implemented mail delay notification?  This
would send mail back to a user announcing that the message was queued up,
but is not lost.  The reason for this is that we often have long periods
where the international links in our network are either slow or
non-existent.  Letting a user know that the message was trapped at a
domestic site could save some people.

-Israel Pinkas
--
--------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The above are my personal opinions, and in no way represent
the opinions of Intel Corporation.  In no way should the above be taken
to be a statement of Intel.

UUCP:	{amdcad,decwrl,hplabs,oliveb,pur-ee,qantel}!intelca!mipos3!cad001!pinkas
ARPA:	pinkas%cad001.intel.com@relay.cs.net
CSNET:	pinkas@cad001.intel.com