Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4045 comp.lang.c++:2150
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!intek01!mark
From: mark@intek01.UUCP (Mark McWiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Is Xenix 386 C as broken as Xenix 286 C?
Keywords: C++
Message-ID: <372@intek01.UUCP>
Date: 1 Dec 88 02:19:15 GMT
Organization: Intek, Inc., Bellevue WA
Lines: 15

We intend to become a C++ shop.  We have the C++ source and would like
C++ to run on our primary development environments, Unix and DOS.  But
Xenix 286 C will not compile some of C++'s output; the compiler crashes
with a segmentation violation.  It also gives the infamous "infinite spill"
message on complicated expressions that the DOS C's seem able to handle.

Is the 386 version any better?  Specifically, do you have AT&T C++ working
with it?

Thanks in advance for any insight.
-- 

Mark McWiggins			UUCP:		uunet!intek01!mark
DISCLAIMER: I could be wrong.	INTERNET:	intek01!mark@uunet.uu.net
						(206) 455-9935