Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!*!postman+ From: jk3k+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joe Keane) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: Why the original RT seemed/was slow (was ...) Message-ID:Date: 1 Dec 88 14:10:25 GMT References: <5046@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1287@auschs.UUCP> <1309@auschs.UUCP>, <3736@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Organization: Carnegie Mellon Lines: 8 In-Reply-To: <3736@pt.cs.cmu.edu> > The APA8 display was a joke, and I am disappointed that IBM believes they > fixed things with the APA16 display. Although both look great on a desk when > they are shut off, both are too small to use for editing. The APA16 card looks quite good with a Moniterm or AED monitor (even if it doesn't do clipping in microcode). --Joe