Xref: utzoo sci.bio:1649 sci.logic:223 sci.misc:2894 sci.math:5026 sci.physics:5055 sci.research:554
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!stc!datlog!dlbedws
From: dlbedws@datlog.co.uk ( Simon Bedwell )
Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.logic,sci.misc,sci.math,sci.physics,sci.research
Subject: Re: Help support our scientific colleagues in the Soviet Union
Message-ID: <1657@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>
Date: 5 Dec 88 11:18:27 GMT
References: <557@uvicctr.UUCP>
Reply-To: dlbedws@datlog.co.uk ( Simon Bedwell )
Organization: Data Logic Ltd, Queens House, Greenhill Way, Harrow, London.
Lines: 17

Whilst I totally agree with the sentiments expressed in this posting I feel
I must comment on the general method of expressing dissatisfaction being
suggested - that of copying, signing and sending STANDARD LETTERS.

My girlfriend worked for a Government Minister.  On hearing about the above,
she told me that it is STANDARD PRACTICE to discard ALL standard letters
received about a subject.  The resoning behind this is that if someone cannot
be bothered to spend time considering the issues involved and composing an
original letter, then they cannot *really* be interested in the subject.

I should add to this that original letters are read and taken note of.

Moral:  DON'T BE LAZY !!  If you really care then THINK about the issues,
			  COMPOSE an original letter,
			  SEND it.

					--SB