Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!ukma!gatech!bbn!husc6!endor!siegel From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: TML Pascal vs. LSP 2.0 Message-ID: <761@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 5 Dec 88 12:09:10 GMT References: <7962@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA Lines: 52 In article <7962@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> dean@xcssun.Berkeley.EDU () writes: Note that since I work for the competition, you should consider carefully everything I say very carefully - don't take my word for it. (Though I won't lie to you. :-) You're likely to get Lightspeed Pascal 2.0 faster if you order through MacConnection, since to order the upgrade involves getting the form, filing the form, having it processed, and having it shipped - about 2 weeks, in all. MacConnection, on the other hand, will ship it overnight. > Which compiler generates tighter code ? Faster code ? Without a doubt, Lightspeed Pascal 2.0. As soon as I find the appropriate pages, I'll post complete speed and size comparisons, so you can see for yourself, and I'll post a StuffIt of the sources we used, so you can try for yourself. > Will TML Pascal compile MacApp ? (from a previous posting I gather I've heard that it won't, but that TML has provided some fixes to make it so; I haven't tried ot myself though. >run.) Why does Symantec advertise Object Pascal support, then say MacApp >compatibility coming soon ? (I _know_ that you don't have to support MacApp >to be an object-oriented language, but I do question the value of an Object >Pascal that can't compile the #1 Object Pascal program.) MacApp support in Lightspeed Pascal isn't an Object Pascal issue, it's a porting issue; some source files need to be reorganized, since Lightspeed Pascal doesn't support the $S directive, and some code needs to be modified, since MacApp does strange things (like rely on code segments being named) in the course of its memory management. At any rate, the ads aren't misleading. Object Pascal support does not imply MacApp support, and one doesn't NEED MacApp to write programs in Object Pascal. I'll post benchmark sources and results as soon as I get my hands on them; probably later this morning. --Rich Rich Siegel Staff Software Developer THINK Technologies Division, Symantec Corp. Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel Phone: (617) 275-4800 x305 Any opinions stated in this article do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of Symantec Corporation or its employees.