Xref: utzoo comp.ai:2789 comp.lang.prolog:1458 comp.sys.mac:23634 comp.sys.mac.programmer:3403 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto From: pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu (Mark E. P. Plutowski) Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.lang.prolog,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Feeling and thought: which comes first? Summary: Opinions requested. Keywords: emotions, intelligence, definitions. Message-ID: <5626@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Date: 5 Dec 88 17:41:12 GMT References: <17770@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: nobody@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU Reply-To: pluto@beowulf.UCSD.EDU (Mark E. P. Plutowski) Organization: EE/CS Dept. U.C. San Diego Lines: 22 One net-poster remarked that emotions and feeling are a natural by-product of thought. I imagine that thought is a natural by-product of feeling and emotion. *************What is the consensus of the rest of you?************ If you like, respond directly to me, and I will summarize and post the results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Plutowski INTERNET: pluto%cs@ucsd.edu Department of Computer Science, C-014 pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 UNIX:{...}!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Plutowski INTERNET: pluto%cs@ucsd.edu Department of Computer Science, C-014 pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu University of California, San Diego BITNET: pluto@ucsd.bitnet La Jolla, California 92093 UNIX:{...}!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto