Xref: utzoo comp.arch:7477 comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt:212 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!sauer From: sauer@auschs.UUCP (Charlie Sauer) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: Why the original RT seemed/was slow (was ...) Summary: yes it was the Advanced C compiler, with AIX Message-ID: <1327@auschs.UUCP> Date: 6 Dec 88 01:22:13 GMT References: <5046@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1287@auschs.UUCP> <1309@auschs.UUCP> <471@scifi.UUCP> Organization: IBM AES, Austin, TX Lines: 13 In article <471@scifi.UUCP>, njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) writes: > I haven't asked Charlie, but I suspect that he would have used the > Advanced C Compiler under AIX for his figures. I haven't compared the > compilers, personally. This is a totally different compiler with > totally different numbers, I presume. Charlie? Yes, it was the Advanced C Compiler, with AIX 2.2, that was used for those numbers, as a footnote (Advanced C, which implies AIX) in the posting indicated. -- C.H. Sauer IBM Advanced Workstations Div. uucp: cs.utexas.edu!ibmaus!sauer 11400 Burnet Road, D75/802 822: @CS.UTEXAS.EDU:sauer@ibmaus.uucp Austin, Texas 78758-2502 aesnet: sauer@auschs (512) 823-3692 vnet: SAUER at AUSVM6