Xref: utzoo comp.arch:7466 comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt:209 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!bywater!scifi!njs From: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: Why the original RT seemed/was slow (was ...) Message-ID: <471@scifi.UUCP> Date: 5 Dec 88 06:56:30 GMT References: <5046@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1287@auschs.UUCP> <1309@auschs.UUCP> <3736@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <447@scifi.UUCP> <3764@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Reply-To: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) Organization: Nick Simicich, Peekskill, NY Lines: 22 In article <3764@pt.cs.cmu.edu> rpd@RPD.MACH.CS.CMU.EDU (Richard Draves) writes: .............. >I dug out my copy of Dhrystone 1.1 and tried to reproduce Sauer's numbers. > Sauer Draves >Model 25 4000 3270 >Model 125 8300 7855 >Model 135 10400 9765 > >I used hc2.1d and ran the tests single-user. Problems with VM don't explain >the discrepancies. (I wonder why the Model 25 number is especially far off?) >Is there some compiler better than hc2.1d? Do AIX and AOS get different >numbers? .............. I haven't asked Charlie, but I suspect that he would have used the Advanced C Compiler under AIX for his figures. I haven't compared the compilers, personally. This is a totally different compiler with totally different numbers, I presume. Charlie? -- Nick Simicich --- uunet!bywater!scifi!njs --- njs@ibm.com (Internet)