Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!rjwhite From: rjwhite@watmath.waterloo.edu (RJ White) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Nuke Waterloo? Message-ID: <22660@watmath.waterloo.edu> Date: 9 Dec 88 05:35:17 GMT References: <10279@watdragon.waterloo.edu><2188@unmvax.unm.edu> <18002@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: rjwhite@watmath.waterloo.edu (RJ White) Organization: University of Waterloo [MFCF] Lines: 17 In article <2188@unmvax.unm.edu>, mike@turing (Michael I. Bushnell) writes: Any ideas on what to do about U. Waterloo's bad net citizenship? It seems to me a site which wants to be a self-appointed censorship board may be better off the net, despite the trouble that would cause to innocent bystanders. Oh, good grief.... can we stop now? I agree its bad net citizenship. very bad. And you want to make it worse. Believe it or not, but I and my other cohorts who supposedly run watmath were also innocent bystanders. Nobody asked my opinion. I never went to the silly press conferences. I took no action to remove Brad. I still dont know what *really* happened. Its the people that run the university, not the people that run watmath that made whatever decisions. Complain to them. But censoring waterloo will make life miserable for alot of people. So please everyone, stop mailing postmaster cause he isnt responsible either. -rj