Newsgroups: news.admin Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: High Volume Calls For New Approach Message-ID: <1988Dec8.172749.11645@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <26469@bu-cs.BU.EDU> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 88 17:27:49 GMT In article <26469@bu-cs.BU.EDU> ptownson@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Patrick Townson) writes: >As for signatures, yes they look lovely, but they may be getting too >expensive from a machine resource point of view.... >... For the posting itself, just sign the >thing, like I always do, and will do now. > >Patrick Townson Unfortunately, signatures containing network address, not just name, are a practical necessity if you want people to be able to get mail to you. The article-header information is *not* sufficient except in very favorable cases. The policy I follow is that it takes two lines to give my name, affiliation, and network addresses. Including physical address and phone number is pointless, so there's no need to clutter up the signature with them. (Actually, even affiliation is kind of marginal.) Anything else I can cram into those two lines is fair game. :-) :-) At least my signatures get reactions -- I don't think there's been one in the last six months that hasn't at least drawn mail, and some of them have started real uproars among the narrowminded. -- SunOSish, adj: requiring | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology 32-bit bug numbers. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu