Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-lcc!rzh
From: rzh@lll-lcc.llnl.gov (Roger Hanscom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Static Memory
Message-ID: <2197@lll-lcc.llnl.gov>
Date: 7 Dec 88 02:59:24 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, LCC, Livermore Ca
Lines: 14

In <3618@crash.cts.com> mwilson@crash.cts.com (Marc Wilson) writes:

>   Why are you complaining about having to use static memory, anyway?

Who's complaining??  Static is just fine....now.  But in the bad old
days, one could heat the house with 8 static CARDS (and a huge PS!)
to do what 8 dynamic CHIPS did.  There was quite an advantage to using
dynamic memory then.

                                  Roger
<------------>
   {ucbvax,ames,lll-crg,....}!lll-lcc!freedom!rzh
   or {ucbvax,ames,lll-crg,....}!lll-lcc!rzh
   or rzh%freedom.llnl.gov@lll-lcc.llnl.gov