Xref: utzoo comp.ai:2789 comp.lang.prolog:1458 comp.sys.mac:23634 comp.sys.mac.programmer:3403
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto
From: pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu (Mark E. P. Plutowski)
Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.lang.prolog,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Feeling and thought: which comes first?
Summary: Opinions requested.
Keywords: emotions, intelligence, definitions.
Message-ID: <5626@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>
Date: 5 Dec 88 17:41:12 GMT
References: <17770@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: nobody@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU
Reply-To: pluto@beowulf.UCSD.EDU (Mark E. P. Plutowski)
Organization: EE/CS Dept. U.C. San Diego
Lines: 22

One net-poster remarked that emotions and feeling are a natural
by-product of thought.

I imagine that thought is a natural by-product of feeling and emotion.


*************What is the consensus of the rest of you?************

If you like, respond directly to me, and I will summarize and
post the results.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Plutowski				INTERNET: pluto%cs@ucsd.edu	
Department of Computer Science, C-014   	  pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu
University of California, San Diego     
La Jolla, California 92093   		UNIX:{...}!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Plutowski				INTERNET: pluto%cs@ucsd.edu	
Department of Computer Science, C-014   	  pluto@beowulf.ucsd.edu
University of California, San Diego     BITNET:	  pluto@ucsd.bitnet
La Jolla, California 92093   		UNIX:{...}!sdcsvax!beowulf!pluto