Xref: utzoo comp.arch:7477 comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt:212
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!sauer
From: sauer@auschs.UUCP (Charlie Sauer)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: Re: Why the original RT seemed/was slow (was ...)
Summary: yes it was the Advanced C compiler, with AIX
Message-ID: <1327@auschs.UUCP>
Date: 6 Dec 88 01:22:13 GMT
References: <5046@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1287@auschs.UUCP> <1309@auschs.UUCP> <471@scifi.UUCP>
Organization: IBM AES, Austin, TX
Lines: 13

In article <471@scifi.UUCP>, njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) writes:
> I haven't asked Charlie, but I suspect that he would have used the
> Advanced C Compiler under AIX for his figures.  I haven't compared the
> compilers, personally.  This is a totally different compiler with
> totally different numbers, I presume.  Charlie?

Yes, it was the Advanced C Compiler, with AIX 2.2, that was used for those 
numbers, as a footnote (Advanced C, which implies AIX) in the posting indicated.
-- 
C.H. Sauer IBM Advanced Workstations Div. uucp: cs.utexas.edu!ibmaus!sauer
           11400 Burnet Road, D75/802      822: @CS.UTEXAS.EDU:sauer@ibmaus.uucp
           Austin, Texas 78758-2502     aesnet: sauer@auschs  
           (512) 823-3692                 vnet: SAUER at AUSVM6