Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!spolsky-joel
From: spolsky-joel@CS.YALE.EDU (Joel Spolsky)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Query: Commando
Message-ID: <44386@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Date: 30 Nov 88 04:51:05 GMT
References: <2746@silver.bacs.indiana.edu>
Sender: root@yale.UUCP
Reply-To: spolsky-joel@CS.YALE.EDU (Joel Spolsky)
Distribution: na
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept, New Haven CT  06520-2158
Lines: 21

In article <2746@silver.bacs.indiana.edu> burleigh@silver.bacs.indiana.edu (frank burleigh) writes:
>We have one command line editor coming over the net now (ANARKEY), and I
>saw parts of a discussion of another one (COMMNDO).  Was Commando ever
>distributed?  It sounded interesting, and I'd like to compare it to
>ANARKEY (when that is all here).

I have a beta copy of commando and right now, it's a lot better than
anarkey. Also the author has promised modifications that address all
of my (minor) gripes.

I have switched to COMMANDO because it has more features than FILEC,
CED, and UNCLE combined, and fits in about 15K.

What is holding up Commando? If it doesn't get posted soon I'll email
it to anyone who's interested.

+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|  Joel Spolsky  | bitnet: spolsky@yalecs.bitnet     uucp: ...!yale!spolsky |
|                | internet: spolsky@cs.yale.edu     voicenet: 203-436-1483 |
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
                                                     #include