Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: "From:" vs. "From_" Message-ID: <2379@ficc.uu.net> Date: 6 Dec 88 12:57:54 GMT References:<1297@ucsd.EDU> <1299@ucsd.EDU> Organization: SCADA Lines: 15 Perhaps RFC976 needs a Path: line, which everyone diddles, and a From: line, which only gateways diddle. As a further refinement, if the gateway knows how to get to the existing From: line, it might be advisable for it to clear the Path: line, or add a new empty one. That way you can use the Path: line (if needed) to get to the gateway, and trust the gateway to get it back past that. Only if the gateway can't get back to the original machine should it migrate the Path: line into the From: line. I hink this should cover most everything... -- Peter da Silva `-_-' Ferranti International Controls Corporation "Have you hugged U your wolf today?" uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter Disclaimer: I accept full responsibility for my typos. peter@ficc.uu.net