Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!vector!nobody
From: munnari!stcns3.stc.oz.au!dave@uunet.UU.NET (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Telephone restrictors
Message-ID: 
Date: 5 Dec 88 04:37:14 GMT
Sender: chip@vector.UUCP
Lines: 14
Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp
X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 8, issue 194, message 2

In article  dgc@math.ucla.edu writes:
|
| 5.  When the battery goes dead (which happens with no warning) it stops
|     restricting.  It would be better if a dead battery disabled outgoing
|     calls.

Ummm...  I would be just a little bit annoyed if I couldn't make an
emergency out-going call, just because of a stupid flat battery!  This
sounds like RISKS material.

--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU),  Alcatel-STC Australia,  dave@stcns3.stc.oz
dave%stcns3.stc.oz.AU@uunet.UU.NET,  ...munnari!stcns3.stc.oz.AU!dave
    PCs haven't changed computing history - merely repeated it