Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:10531 comp.os.misc:692 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!babbage!mac3n From: mac3n@babbage.acc.virginia.edu (Alex Colvin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.os.misc Subject: Re: Does anyone still use Multics?? Summary: PL/multics, PL/I(G) Message-ID: <438@babbage.acc.virginia.edu> Date: 6 Dec 88 14:21:56 GMT References: <6392@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <32902@think.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 5 just a gnit to pick ... Multics PL/I wasn't full PL/I, either IBM or ANSI. Effectively, Multics defined the compileable subset of PL/I. This is responsible for the success (such as it is) of PL/I outside IBM.