Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!tank!kean
From: kean@tank.uchicago.edu (keane arase)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Nuke Waterloo?
Summary: Has anyone called LGS for a rebuttal?
Message-ID: <1094@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 8 Dec 88 16:58:30 GMT
References: <10279@watdragon.waterloo.edu>  <2188@unmvax.unm.edu> <18002@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: kean@tank.uchicago.edu (keane arase)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 29

In article <18002@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>In article <2188@unmvax.unm.edu>, mike@turing (Michael I. Bushnell) writes:
>
>>   Well, it seems that JEDR got his way...
>
>  Any ideas on what to do about U. Waterloo's bad net
>citizenship? It seems to me a site which wants to be a
>self-appointed censorship board may be better off the net,
>despite the trouble that would cause to innocent bystanders.
>--
>ucbvax!garnet!gsmith    Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
>ucbvax!bosco!gsmith                  Institute of Pi Research

Has anyone called Brad up at LGS for a rebuttal of U. Waterloo's action?

Even though he has no net access, he should be given some sort of path
to comment on U. Waterloo's inappropriate actions.

BTW, I agree with Gene.  Something should be done with an *educational*
institution who wants to inhibit free opinion.
---

Keane Arase, Systems Programmer
University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Acedemic and Public Computing, Technical Project Support
kean@tank.uchicago.edu
syskean@uchimvs1.uchicago.edu

              **  Please file the standard disclaimers here  **