Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!ditto
From: ditto@cbmvax.UUCP (Michael "Ford" Ditto)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: how do I tell the size of a pseudoterm window?
Keywords: layers xt
Message-ID: <5445@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 6 Dec 88 05:11:57 GMT
References: <2081@vedge.UUCP> <6766@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <564@auspex.UUCP> <9047@smoke.BRL.MIL> <577@auspex.UUCP>
Reply-To: ditto@cbmvax.UUCP (Michael "Ford" Ditto)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 26

In article <577@auspex.UUCP> guy@auspex.UUCP (Guy Harris) writes:
>	   (I presume you can, under layers, somehow arrange
>	   to run a program on a machine other than the one to which
>	   your layers terminal is connected and have it interact
>	   with layers just as if it were running on that machine; if
>	   not, X11 does a *better* job than layers does in that
>	   instance.)

I disagree.  An X11 application can not do its display on a machine
to which it is not connected, either; I think your complaint about
layers is more about the fact that layers is usually run over a
direct serial link, and X is usually run over a (multiple-machine)
network.  Both systems require a virtual 8-bit flow-controlled data
path between the display server and the application, and I think
they are very similar in that respect.

I think the layers protocol is a bit intertwined with the underlying
"xt" protocol, so it may have a slight deficiency there (experts,
please correct as needed).
-- 
					-=] Ford [=-

"The number of Unix installations	(In Real Life:  Mike Ditto)
has grown to 10, with more expected."	ford@kenobi.cts.com
- The Unix Programmer's Manual,		...!sdcsvax!crash!elgar!ford
  2nd Edition, June, 1972.		ditto@cbmvax.commodore.com