Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!gatech!ncar!noao!asuvax!teroach!stan
From: stan@teroach.UUCP (Stan Fisher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: 1084 or 1084S monitors
Message-ID: <1577@teroach.UUCP>
Date: 1 Dec 88 15:35:29 GMT
References: <3579@crash.cts.com> <583@wuphys.UUCP>
Reply-To: stan@teroach.UUCP (Stan Fisher)
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 30

In article <583@wuphys.UUCP> lel@wuphys.UUCP (Lyle E. Levine) writes:
>In article <3579@crash.cts.com> maddie@pnet01.cts.com (Tom Schenck) writes:
>>
>>you are willing to spend the extra $250 or so, I would go for an NEC
>>MultiSync, BUT the NEC doesn't work to well in interlace mode. Nice sharp
>>edged in any other mode, tho...
>
>I have an NEC Multisync II hooked up to an Amiga 2000 here at Wash. U.
>and another on my Amiga 2000 at home.  They work great in interlace
>mode (much better than the 1084 and 1080). 
>

I appoligize for posting this, but two attemps to e-mail have bounced:

Lyle, you stated your NEC multi-sync II works fine with interlaced.  
A friend of mine is trying to get a Magnovox multi-sync to work on her 2000, 
and the interlace looks like crap.  I don't know if the two monitors are close
enough, but what did you do on your NEC to make it work, specifically,
what is your cable pinout connecting the monitor?  I was told at COMDEX 
by a Commodore person that the cabling was the trick.  If the NEC will work 
and Magnovox won't, maybe she could take it back and trade for the NEC.

Thanks in advace, and again, I appoligize for posting this.


___________________________________________________________________________
+           Stan Fisher        uunet!unisoft!nud!teroach!stan             
+ Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Arizona -  (602) 438-3228
+ "...no no, let's wait for the A5000, MC88000 based Amiga with 536 Million
+  colors and 2K square graphics resolution, Yeah, that's the ticket.."