Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:10531 comp.os.misc:692
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!babbage!mac3n
From: mac3n@babbage.acc.virginia.edu (Alex Colvin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: Does anyone still use Multics??
Summary: PL/multics, PL/I(G)
Message-ID: <438@babbage.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: 6 Dec 88 14:21:56 GMT
References: <6392@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <32902@think.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 5

just a gnit to pick ...

Multics PL/I wasn't full PL/I, either IBM or ANSI.  Effectively, Multics
defined the compileable subset of PL/I.  This is responsible for the
success (such as it is) of PL/I outside IBM.