Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!netsys!vector!nobody From: bnr-fos!bnr-public!hwt (Henry@vector.uucp Troup) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Octothorpe source Message-ID:Date: 22 Nov 88 15:57:48 GMT Sender: chip@vector.UUCP Lines: 13 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 8, issue 187, message 3 In article ucla-an!bongo!julian@ee.UCLA.EDU (julian macassey) writes: > > I am looking for an authoritative reference for the term >OCTOTHORPE. > >Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo voice (213) 653-4495 I believe AT&T named the little beastie. Anyone at AT&T wanted to claim responsibility? Henry Troup utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-fos!hwt%bnr-public | BNR is not Bell-Northern Reseach hwt@bnr (BITNET/NETNORTH) | responsible for Ottawa, Canada (613) 765-2337 (Voice) | my opinions