Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!rutgers!att!ihlpm!jmdavis From: jmdavis@ihlpm.ATT.COM (Davis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CMI 68000 2x Summary: benchmarks, here here! Message-ID: <2368@ihlpm.ATT.COM> Date: 26 Sep 88 16:35:35 GMT References: <3372@crash.cts.com>,Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 19 In article , mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes: > > Could you post some benchmarks to validate this claim? The CMI board sounds > interesting, but I wouldn't consider buying it without having heard hard facts > > Yes, I too am in favor of benchmarks, if they are good I would seriously consider buying this product. So please post them to the net. BTW, I originally tried to reply to one of the CMI folks who posted to this thread, but my mailer bounced it. -- ________________________________________ | Mike Davis | ..!att!ihlpm!jmdavis |_________________________