Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!jojo From: jojo@astroatc.UUCP (Jon Wesener) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: New IFF format details (long). Keywords: byte-sex Message-ID: <1199@astroatc.UUCP> Date: 21 Sep 88 18:53:12 GMT References: <3450@crash.cts.com> <7167@well.UUCP> Reply-To: jojo@astroatc.UUCP (Jon Wesener) Organization: Astronautics Technology Cntr, Madison, WI Lines: 12 I'd like to see the dependency on byte-sex disappear, you know, Big Indian, Little Indian. IFF is only good on machines with the same byte sex as the 68000. This has fouled me up on a number of occasions. my 2 cents, --j -- ... {seismo | harvard } ! {uwvax | cs.wisc.edu} ! astroatc!jojo "They weren't just any women... They were women fresh from Hell, with wisps of devil-smoke curling behind their ears and unholy vapors hiding in their tight leather dresses, looking for Mr. Right."