Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:8759 comp.unix.wizards:11204 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!necntc!encore!bzs From: bzs@encore.UUCP (Barry Shein) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: VMS vs. UNIX file system Message-ID: <3624@encore.UUCP> Date: 18 Sep 88 16:41:11 GMT References: <411@marob.MASA.COM> <3597@encore.UUCP> <179@arnold.UUCP> <3613@encore.UUCP> <182@arnold.UUCP> Organization: Encore Computer Corp, Marlboro, MA Lines: 22 In-reply-to: dave@arnold.UUCP's message of 17 Sep 88 15:36:10 GMT >I should have added a bunch of :-) to my original followup. It seems >there is a bitter feeling towards my posting. I didn't intend to cause >such feelings. I will be more careful in the future. > >My appologies. > >Signed, > >Dave (egg on my face) Arnold No bitter feeling or any such thing, I was just trying to draw out exactly what in my note you were objecting to, I might have been wrong, as inconceivable as that may be. Such disagreements are oftentimes explained by nothing more (or less) than differing perceptions of priorities, in this case the importance/frequency of a need for efficient keyed (&c) storage access methods. But do wipe the egg of your face, it's just left over from breakfast and is irrelevant to the conversation, it's making us sick Dave :-) -Barry Shein, ||Encore||