Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hp-sde!hpcea!hpausla!cjh From: cjh@hpausla.HP.COM (Clifford Heath) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: comp.4gl ???? Message-ID: <2820002@hpausla.HP.COM> Date: 26 Sep 88 06:09:13 GMT Organization: HP Australian Software Operation Lines: 12 With all the traffic about 4gl's (especially Informix) recently, how about creating comp.4gl? I mean, there are now quite a few 4gl's that don't come from database vendors, so including 4gl talk in comp.databases is really a bit wrong. Who knows, perhaps the recent articles could have been relegated to comp.4gl.bugs. What do you think? I'm for comp.4gl; I'd use & read it daily. Clifford Heath, Hewlett Packard Australian Software Operation. (UUCP: hplabs!hpfcla!hpausla!cjh, ACSnet: cjh@hpausla.oz)