Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!rtech!gonzo!daveb From: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: 3demo program, really Subject line Message-ID: <426@gonzo.UUCP> Date: 24 Sep 88 22:13:21 GMT References: <8809101533.AA21029@philmds.dts.philips.nl> <1020@vsi1.UUCP> <1571@ficc.uu.net> <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> Reply-To: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower) Organization: Gonzo Media Group Lines: 19 In article <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> greg%sentry@spar.slb.com (Greg Wageman) writes: >On an unrelated subject: > >I would like to vote for changing the "Subject:" lines of multi-part >postings to be all identical, and have the part numbers be somewhere >else. This is so that the "-S" option of rn can find all of the parts >of a posting before moving onto the next subject. With the part >numbers in the subject line, each part becomes effectively a different >subject as far as rn is concerned. > >Thanks. No thanks. A lot of archiving gets an Index from the Subject line. Without differences between parts 1 and N of a multipart posting in the Subject, it would be really hard to figure out what was what. Is "=" that hard to use in rn? -dB