Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!rutgers!apple!well!slf
From: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: R.I.P. Byte
Message-ID: <7135@well.UUCP>
Date: 18 Sep 88 15:24:26 GMT
References: <402@mfgfoc.UUCP> <674@proxftl.UUCP> <2596@sugar.uu.net> <5716@utah-cs.UUCP> <1461@ficc.uu.net> <5724@utah-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 14



>To this, I say, no, that still doesn't do it. She, herself, wrote that
>she only replied by chance so to speak. Therefore, again this does
>not show the responsiveness of InfoWorld. Can we count on more
>from InfoWorld? What if she were fired, or died (god forbid)? Then
>how could we be certain InfoWorld would respond? As far as I know,
>neither magazine has any staff assigned to respond on this net.

If I were fired, or died (or quit, which is another option), I can pretty
much guarantee that you'd never hear another peep out of InfoWorld.  There
is another staffer here who does use the Net a teensy bit, but he doesn't
have the time or the inclination to hang out here.
Actually, if I were fired or quit, you'd still hear from me -- I just wouldn't
be a representative of InfoWorld any more.