Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:8759 comp.unix.wizards:11204
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!necntc!encore!bzs
From: bzs@encore.UUCP (Barry Shein)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: VMS vs. UNIX file system
Message-ID: <3624@encore.UUCP>
Date: 18 Sep 88 16:41:11 GMT
References: <411@marob.MASA.COM> <3597@encore.UUCP> <179@arnold.UUCP> <3613@encore.UUCP> <182@arnold.UUCP>
Organization: Encore Computer Corp, Marlboro, MA
Lines: 22
In-reply-to: dave@arnold.UUCP's message of 17 Sep 88 15:36:10 GMT


>I should have added a bunch of :-) to my original followup.  It seems
>there is a bitter feeling towards my posting.  I didn't intend to cause
>such feelings.  I will be more careful in the future.
>
>My appologies.
>
>Signed,
>
>Dave (egg on my face) Arnold

No bitter feeling or any such thing, I was just trying to draw out
exactly what in my note you were objecting to, I might have been
wrong, as inconceivable as that may be. Such disagreements are
oftentimes explained by nothing more (or less) than differing
perceptions of priorities, in this case the importance/frequency of a
need for efficient keyed (&c) storage access methods.

But do wipe the egg of your face, it's just left over from breakfast
and is irrelevant to the conversation, it's making us sick Dave :-)

	-Barry Shein, ||Encore||