Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-tis!tut.fi!jh From: jh@tut.fi (Juha Hein{nen) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway Subject: Re: Avoid blanks... Message-ID:Date: 20 Sep 88 08:52:35 GMT Sender: root@tis.llnl.gov Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 11 Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov I agree with Tommy that blanks are indee needed and used want we them or not. So a way have to be found to live with them and not to try to deny the problem like Piet does. In our current gateway to a commercial mail network we succesfully map blanks to _s and I don't see why such mapping coudn't be made an explicit part of the recommendation. -- -- Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)