Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:3387 comp.unix.microport:1584 comp.databases:1403 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pacbell!belltec!dar From: dar@belltec.UUCP (Dimitri Rotow) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,comp.databases Subject: Re: FoxBASE+ Summary: Foxbase should work fine on 3.2 Message-ID: <269@belltec.UUCP> Date: 20 Sep 88 15:45:44 GMT References: <7341@cdin-1.uucp> <5138@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> <857@viscous> <334@telly.UUCP> Organization: Bell Technologies, Fremont, CA Lines: 13 In article <334@telly.UUCP>, evan@telly.UUCP (Evan Leibovitch) writes: ... [ discusses FoxBASE porting schedule] ... > > If Tim's schedule is true, then there is not even a port being developed > in time for the Xenix/Unix merged 386 product. > The merged product, Release 3.2, should run FoxBASE without any changes to the existing binary. If it doesn't, then Release 3.2 should be fixed, not FoxBASE. I believe (caveat emptor until final release!) that 3.2 has already been tested with FoxBASE. - Dimitri Rotow