Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pyrdc!pyrnj!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!msmith
From: msmith@topaz.rutgers.edu (Mark Robert Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: SEA vs. PK suit
Keywords: pk, suit, phil katz
Message-ID: 
Date: 24 Sep 88 01:43:51 GMT
References: <256@twg-ap.UUCP> <3548@tekigm2.TEK.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: M. R. Smith Consulting, New Brunswick, NJ
Lines: 31
To: timothym@tekigm2.UUCP

In article <3548@tekigm2.TEK.COM> timothym@tekigm2.TEK.COM (Timothy D Margeson) writes:

> Enough is enough.... Does anyone have the address of the judiciating court?
> And the judges name? If you do, send it to me, or post it as well.

> If even 100 of us readers write letters to the judge, explaining that arcing
> is a term used to compressing files long before ARC.XXX arrived, then perhaps
> we can get this case thrown out of court.

> We will need to express in the letter our credentials, to back up our
> statements. College students who haven't worked in the field are invited to
> write as well, but we really need 5 or more year veterans of the computer
> industry.

> Those interested in supplying a group letter may contact me.

> Tim Margeson (206)253-5240

I believe the proper way to do this is to file a "Friend of the Court"
brief.  I have absolutely no idea how to do this, but will be willing
to contribute.

Mark
p.s. This opinion does not in any way, shape, or form represent the
opinion of Rutgers University or Thomas J. Lipton, Inc, and neither
have I been authorized to speak for either.
-- 
Mark Smith (alias Smitty) "Be careful when looking into the distance,
RPO 1604; CN 5063       that you do not miss what is right under your nose."
New Brunswick, NJ 08903    {backbone}!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!msmith 
msmith@topaz.rutgers.edu        Who cares in '88?