Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:8827 comp.unix.wizards:11276 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!gatech!emcard!stiatl!meo From: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: VMS vs. UNIX file system Summary: One reason to use text files for nearly everything Message-ID: <343@stiatl.UUCP> Date: 21 Sep 88 12:54:27 GMT References: <411@marob.MASA.COM> <3597@encore.UUCP> <3438@crash.cts.com> <68855@sun.uucp> Organization: Sales Technologies Inc., Atlanta, GA Lines: 27 In article <68855@sun.uucp>, guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes: > 3) Many more UNIX facilities use text files, rather than record files, > as their underlying file format; while one reason for this may be > the absence of a "record file" library, another reason is that you > can use the standard UNIX text file tools to manipulate those files. If you even have your data files as text files, debugging becomes much easier. For instance, would you rather debug 98764389437034gh307ytfhr398f39 or 12/22/88 01:30 10790 100 100 382 -1 ? These are not real data, but examples of what data files I've dealt with looked like. The processing to do all this is cheap nowdays, so why not use text files if there is no OVERWHELMING reason not to? Another thing this buys you is that, in my experience, its easier to change file formats if you use text files. It requires a little plannning, but in general is a lot less work than doing the same thing with any other type of data. Strangely enough, you can do similar things with VMS, OS/32, or even CP/M...