Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!jojo
From: jojo@astroatc.UUCP (Jon Wesener)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: New IFF format details (long).
Keywords: byte-sex
Message-ID: <1199@astroatc.UUCP>
Date: 21 Sep 88 18:53:12 GMT
References: <3450@crash.cts.com> <7167@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: jojo@astroatc.UUCP (Jon Wesener)
Organization: Astronautics Technology Cntr, Madison, WI
Lines: 12


	I'd like to see the dependency on byte-sex disappear, you know,
Big Indian, Little Indian.  IFF is only good on machines with the same
byte sex as the 68000.  This has fouled me up on a number of occasions.

my 2 cents,
--j
-- 
... {seismo | harvard } ! {uwvax | cs.wisc.edu} ! astroatc!jojo
    "They weren't just any women...  They were women fresh from Hell, with
	wisps of devil-smoke curling behind their ears and unholy vapors hiding 
	in their tight leather dresses, looking for Mr. Right."