Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!strath-cs!glasgow!gilbert From: gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Ontological status of sci.philosophy.tech Message-ID: <1657@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> Date: 23 Sep 88 11:18:35 GMT References: <1632@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <14572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton) Organization: Comp Sci, Glasgow Univ, Scotland Lines: 8 In article <14572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes: >This and the resurrected "free will vs determinism vs quantum mechanics" >debate are probably more appropriate to sci.philosophy.tech. ... and alt.weemba.sheep, and alt.flame.weemba, and alt.weemba.flame, but especially uk.yb-users! :-) -- Gilbert Cockton, Department of Computing Science, The University, Glasgow gilbert@uk.ac.glasgow.cs!ukc!glasgow!gilbert