Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!agate!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ucsd!ucsdhub!sdsu!sdsuelx.uucp!coffey
From: coffey@sdsuelx.uucp (pat coffey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Color Monitors (was Re:Wait a Sec...)
Message-ID: <3163@sdsu.UUCP>
Date: 22 Sep 88 23:35:10 GMT
Sender: news@sdsu.UUCP
Reply-To: coffey@sdsuelx.uucp (pat coffey)
Organization: San Diego State University Computing Services
Lines: 29



Jos Vermaseren asks:
.
.
.

> This leaves the question: why is the American preference for color so much
> greater than in Europe? I posed this question a long time ago, but nobody
> could come up with an explanation. Anybody has one?

I bought an Atari 520 ST when they first came out.  I wanted a good, clear
monitor, so I got a monochrome monitor, which was much better than what
IBM had to offer at the time.  I soon discovered, however, that most of the
software available in the U.S., especially the PD stuff, was not runnable on
my system.  After several years, I broke down and bought a color monitor
so that I could run some of these programs.  When I do my real computer work,
I always use the monochrome monitor.

When I joined our local Atari user group, I discovered that most of the
early members were former owners of 8-bit atari machines.  I think all of
them had color monitors and all of them loved computer games.  None of the
games worked on monochrome at that time.  I don't know if that's the reason,
but I recently heard that U.S. dealers are having a hard time finding color
monitors, so the picture in the U.S. may soon change.

     _   _        Pat Coffey    
    |_) (_        San Diego State University
    |