Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!vector!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: 3demo program, really Subject line
Message-ID: <7181@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 27 Sep 88 14:37:59 GMT
References: <8809101533.AA21029@philmds.dts.philips.nl> <1020@vsi1.UUCP> <1571@ficc.uu.net> <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> <426@gonzo.UUCP> <1
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Organization: HASA, "S" Division
Lines: 12

In article <14711@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes:
>With an extra "Part: ##" heading, automatic archiving could proceed
>just as nicely.

the Archive-name: header which rich $alz and brandon add to their
postings makes automatic archiving a snap.  now, can they just remove
the "part" stuff from the Subject: line???
-- 
John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US)                   HASA, "S" Division

      "Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same
                   entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias