Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!nud!anasaz!john
From: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Radar
Message-ID: <1256@anasaz.UUCP>
Date: 18 Sep 88 15:18:48 GMT
References: <12462@duke.cs.duke.edu>
Reply-To: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore)
Distribution: na
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ
Lines: 25
Summary:Read rec.autos

In article <12462@duke.cs.duke.edu> gazit@bein.UUCP (Hillel Gazit) writes:
]
]I was caught by a police radar which claimed that I was going 65 MPH.
]My speed was 55 MPH.  I think that something was wrong with the radar,
]so I want to challenge the policeman in court.
]
]Can someone please post a list of things that can wrong with a radar?
](I want to ask the policeman if he is absolutly sure that his radar
]was OK, and then ask him to
]explain to me why cannot all the things on the list happen).

Go to rec.auto - you should be able to get knowledgable help there.
]
]Can someone post, in addition, what went wrong with the radar of the ship
]that has shot down the Iranian airliner?
](I want to ask the policeman how comes his radar cannot make any mistakes,
]when the radar of a very expensive warship has made them.)

Apparently the radar did not make mistakes. It was a collection of
human errors.

-- 
John Moore (NJ7E)           {decvax, ncar, ihnp4}!noao!nud!anasaz!john
(602) 861-7607 (day or eve) {gatech, ames, rutgers}!ncar!...
The opinions expressed here are obviously not mine, so they must be
someone else's.