Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!rutgers!apple!well!slf From: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: R.I.P. Byte Message-ID: <7135@well.UUCP> Date: 18 Sep 88 15:24:26 GMT References: <402@mfgfoc.UUCP> <674@proxftl.UUCP> <2596@sugar.uu.net> <5716@utah-cs.UUCP> <1461@ficc.uu.net> <5724@utah-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher) Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA Lines: 14 >To this, I say, no, that still doesn't do it. She, herself, wrote that >she only replied by chance so to speak. Therefore, again this does >not show the responsiveness of InfoWorld. Can we count on more >from InfoWorld? What if she were fired, or died (god forbid)? Then >how could we be certain InfoWorld would respond? As far as I know, >neither magazine has any staff assigned to respond on this net. If I were fired, or died (or quit, which is another option), I can pretty much guarantee that you'd never hear another peep out of InfoWorld. There is another staffer here who does use the Net a teensy bit, but he doesn't have the time or the inclination to hang out here. Actually, if I were fired or quit, you'd still hear from me -- I just wouldn't be a representative of InfoWorld any more.