Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pyrdc!pyrnj!rutgers!att!whuts!wv From: wv@whuts.UUCP (DUNCAN) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Net.Porn ? Keywords: porn, underage, lawsuit Message-ID: <4805@whuts.UUCP> Date: 23 Sep 88 10:53:01 GMT References: <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM> Reply-To: wv@whuts.UUCP (54299-DUNCAN,W.) Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany, NJ Lines: 12 In article <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM> wbt@cbnews.ATT.COM (William B. Thacker) writes: >a future target of "anti-porn" crusaders. All it would take would be >one closed-minded fundamentalist finding out that 12-year-olds with >computers and modems can get access to alt.sex, soc.motss, soc.women, >and other "adult theme" groups. Soc.women?! Soc.motss?! You're kidding, right? What do you think goes on there? There's a big difference between the restriction of pornography and the restriction of information. Bill Duncan att!whuts!wv