Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!spdcc!dyer
From: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Net.Porn ?
Summary: my two cents :-)
Message-ID: <1932@spdcc.COM>
Date: 25 Sep 88 18:38:47 GMT
References: <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM> <7232@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Reply-To: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer)
Distribution: na
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Lines: 12

In article <7232@gryphon.CTS.COM> mhnadel@gryphon.CTS.COM (Miriam Nadel) writes:
>BTW, I suspect you read neither soc.motss or soc.women if you think they
>are "adult theme."

Soc.motss could be considered to have an "adult theme" if you define it as
a bunch of adults acting like intelligent adults talking about matters of
interest to adults in an adult manner.  Bad stuff, and surely outside the
mainstream...
-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@harvard.harvard.edu
dyer@spdcc.COM aka {harvard,husc6,linus,ima,bbn,m2c,mipseast}!spdcc!dyer