Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-tis!tut.fi!jh
From: jh@tut.fi (Juha Hein{nen)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: Avoid blanks...
Message-ID: 
Date: 20 Sep 88 08:52:35 GMT
Sender: root@tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11
Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov


I agree with Tommy that blanks are indee needed and used want we them
or not.  So a way have to be found to live with them and not to try to
deny the problem like Piet does.

In our current gateway to a commercial mail network we succesfully map
blanks to _s and I don't see why such mapping coudn't be made an
explicit part of the recommendation.
--
--	Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland
	jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)