Xref: utzoo comp.unix.aux:376 gnu.emacs:2 comp.sys.mac:20702 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!earleh From: earleh@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Earle R. Horton) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux,gnu.emacs,comp.sys.mac Subject: ./etc/APPLE. No Free Software for Mac users. Message-ID: <10152@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Date: 23 Sep 88 16:56:12 GMT Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU Reply-To: earleh@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Earle R. Horton) Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 96 Apple Computer Company has won the "honor" of having a file in the GNU Emacs version 18.52 distribution named after them. (./etc/APPLE, this is even better than SUNBUG, which I haven't read yet.) I include a copy of the file below for those who do not have access to the GNU Emacs files or the latest distribution of them. Although I agree in principle with much of what the author is trying to accomplish in this letter, he seems to have missed or ignored something about Apple Computer and specifically the Macintosh. The Macintosh is not a "better computer" than most of the competition, it has better system software. What sells Macintoshes is NOT the hardware, which is pretty nondescript except for a few innovative components, but the graphical interface which is contained in ROM and on the System Disks. Apple is selling software in the case of the Macintosh, and when people buy one they are pretty much aware of this. No matter that the guts of the software comes prepackaged in ROMs where it is difficult to copy, it is still software that makes the thing work the way it does. Ownership of rights to software is a great deal more tenuous at present than ownership of rights to hardware designs, and Apple is taking steps in this lawsuit thing to establish just what the limits of its rights to its own software are. I see nothing wrong with them trying to do so, particularly since their investment in writing said software must have been considerable. I say, this is a country where the courts can decide, and they may be able to do a better job than Richard Stallman et. al. Furthermore, if I buy any manufacturer's computer, I am pretty sure I am feeding lawyers! Well, that's my two cents worth. Now, for an amusing question: In view of the GNU boycott of Apple, will A/UX 1.1 include GNU Emacs 18.52, and if so will the file ./etc/APPLE come on the A/UX distribution? ----------------------cut here---------------------- @unnumbered Special Report: Apple's New Look and Feel You might have read about the new look-and-feel copyright lawsuit, Apple vs. Hewlett Packard and Microsoft. Apple claims the power to stop people from writing any program that works even vaguely like a Macintosh. If they and other look-and-feel plaintiffs triumph, they will use this new power over the public to put an end to free software that could substitute for commercial software. In the weeks after the suit was filed, USENET reverberated with condemnation for Apple. GNU supporters Richard Stallman, John Gilmore, and Paul Rubin decided to take action against Apple's no-longer-deserved reputation as a force for progress. Apple's reputation comes from having made better computers; but now, Apple is working to make all non-Apple computers worse. If this deprives the public of the future work of many companies, the harm done would be many times the good that any one company does. Our hope was that if the user community realizes how destructive Apple's present actions are, Apple would lose customers and have more trouble finding employees. Our method of action was to print 5000 buttons that say ``Keep Your Lawyers Off My Computer'' and hand them out at the West Coast Computer Faire. The center of the button shows the rainbow-apple logo with a Gigeresque mouth full of ferocious teeth. The picture was drawn by Etienne Suvasa, who also drew the cover for the GNU Emacs manual. We call the picture ``Apple's New Look and Feel''. We gave out nearly 4000 buttons at the show (saving the rest for afterwards). The result was a great success: the extent of anger at Apple was apparent to everyone at the show. Many of the invited speakers at the show wore our buttons, spoke about them, or even waved them from the podium. The press noticed this: at least one Macintosh user's magazine carried a photo of the button afterwards. Some of you may be considering using, buying, or recommending Macintoshes; you might even be writing programs for them or thinking about it. Please think twice and look for an alternative. Doing those things means more success for Apple, and this could encourage Apple to persist in its aggression. It also encourages other companies to try similar obstructionism. [It is because of this boycott that we don't include support for Macontosh Unix in GNU software.] You might think that your current project ``needs'' a Macintosh now. If you find yourself thinking this way, consider the far future. You probably plan to be alive a year or two from now, and working on some other project. You will want to get good computers for that, too. But an Apple monopoly could easily make the price of such computers at that time several times what it would otherwise be. Your decision to use some other kind of machine, or to defer your purchases now, might make sure that the machines your next project needs are affordable when you need them. Newspapers report that Macintosh clones will be available soon. If you must buy a Macintosh-like machine, buy a clone. Don't feed the lawyers! ----------------------cut here---------------------- Earle R. Horton. 23 Fletcher Circle, Hanover, NH 03755 (603) 643-4109 Sorry, no fancy stuff, since this program limits my .signature to three