Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!helios.ee.lbl.gov!lll-tis!darmstadt.gmd.dbp.de!grimm
From: grimm@darmstadt.gmd.dbp.de (Ruediger Grimm)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re:  Start and end delimiter
Message-ID: <1632:grimm@darmstadt.gmd.dbp.de>
Date: 19 Sep 88 08:03:36 GMT
Sender: root@tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 24
Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov

> > ...
> > and can, of course, be left out. The notation can be
> >   C=gb; A=GOLD 400; P=UK.AC; O=UCL; S=Master; G=Peter as well as
> >   C=gb;A=GOLD 400;P=UK.AC;O=UCL;S=Master;G=Peter.
> > ...
> Just look at the end of your example. What tells me that the Given Name is:
>         "G=Peter as well as"
> or      "G=Peter as well"
> or      "G=Peter as"
> or      "G=Peter"
> or      "G=Peter."
> Seems that we need some precision, here...
>
> Christian Huitema

The proposed change in the recommendation paper is like this:
Three lines will be added to the paragraph "formal description":

--- No formal end of a SAVAList is defined here.
--- The start and stop delimiter of a SAVAList must be made clear
--- by the context (outside the scope of this description).


Greetings --- Ruediger