Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq@plaid.Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: The Death of Shareware (Re: McSink Registered Owners, take note) Keywords: McSink Vantage upgrade Andrew Welch Message-ID: <69389@sun.uucp> Date: 21 Sep 88 17:46:41 GMT References: <5251@fluke.COM> <601@afit-ab.arpa> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) Distribution: na Organization: Fictional Reality Lines: 83 > Are we seeing the death of the shareware concept? We've been seeing the death of shareware for a long time. Among the casualties to date are Red Ryder and CE Software. Now these folks. Why? There are two basic flaws in shareware today. Between the two of them, shareware is caught in a pinscher movement that will force serious software people out of shareware. Problem 1: you don't pay for what you use. Completely ignoring the licensing requests and restrictions on the individual pieces of shareware (some of which are amazingly silly), it basically comes down to this: if you use the software, you pay for it. How many of you do? I currently have four pieces of shareware on my desk (that pitiful number will lead to problem 2 below). I've paid for three of them: Miniwriter and StuffIt and Kiwienvelopes. Why? I use them. Constantly. The third, which I haven't paid for, is McSink. Why? I'll get into that later. Problem 2: bad shareware. There's a *lot* of garbage being 'marketed' as as shareware. Someone puts in a weekend hack and decides to upload it and maybe make a buck. It's ugly, it's trivial, it's buggy. Maybe it'll crash your hard disk (this happened to me once). Whatever, there are hundreds and hundreds of shareware programs, and most of them aren't worth the space that they take up on a floppy. With *that* much garbage out there, is it surprising that folks give up on shareware? It has to be really something interesting to get me to download these days -- something that looks really good or that I really need. 95% of the time I'm still dreadfully disappointed, and it either gets shoved to floppy or deleted outright. On the one side, the idiots are uploading crap and making it hard for the real shareware authors to get their wares known. Once they are known, people don't pay them for their work (and frankly, I'm a lot less likely to pay for shareware these days because of the times I've been burned by shareware that I paid for early on, and then didn't get the upgrade, or didn't get the manual, or the program decided to break or show up a bug and the author decided not to bother fixing it. I'd much rather buy commercial, more expensive or not, and get the entire package at once and have a hope of support and an upgrade path [of course, I've been burned there, too. But not as often]. If you publish Shareware, you can't win. Even if you have a killer product, you don't get paid for it. Good press clippins and lots of applause are nice, but they don't pay the bills. And once have a shareware product, if you try to take it commercial, you run the risk of having people look at is as a 'cheap' product, or having them look at you as if you've 'sold out' (you USED to *give* it away. Now you're going to charge us? How DARE you?). No wonder shareware's dying. It was originally viewed as an alternate distribution channel to commercial software. It's been subverted by the folks looking for a quick buck on their quick hack. Shareware was supposed to mean commercial quality software, cheaper. What it really means, with a few, very few, exceptions is software that isn't good enough to be sold. 95% of the stuff being 'sold' as shareware these days would have been uploaded and given away in the public domain in 'the good old days' before the shareware concept was invented. And most of it isn't worth the download time, much less the shareware fee. Finally, McSink. I have it. I use it. I haven't paid for it. Why? Partly self-admitted laziness -- I haven't gotten around to it. But I don't use McSink that much, and I'm not really happy with it. It does what I want, sort of -- except when it crashes. And I've spent a lot of time and money downloading what seems like 37 different versions of the stupid program, as the author learns how to use his customer base as an extended beta site. The current version still crashes regularly on me, too. Because the thing isn't stable and really has never been stable, I've never been convinced that I'm going to want to keep it around permanently. I can live without McSink, and one of these days I probably will. McSink hasn't sold me. Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM Delphi: CHUQ Editor/Publisher, OtherRealms