Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!ucsd!sdcsvax!amos!jerry From: jerry@amos.ling.ucsd.edu (Jerry Lugert) Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets Subject: Re: Neural Nets??? BUMBLE-BEE! Summary: I don't think so. Message-ID: <5328@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Date: 27 Sep 88 08:03:16 GMT References: <551@epicb.UUCP> Sender: nobody@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU Reply-To: jerry@sdamos.ling.ucsd.edu (Jerry Lugert) Distribution: comp.ai.neural-nets Organization: Univ. of Calif., San Diego Lines: 17 In article <551@epicb.UUCP> david@epicb.UUCP (David P. Cook) writes: >I am alittle taken-back by this group (comp.ai.neural-nets)... So far, I > > Come on! Lots of us want to keep abreast of the latest in neural > progress! > > So... to get the ball rolling... can anyone give me more scoop on the > BUMBLEBEE system... supposedly it contained roughly the same number of > neurons as a bumble-bee. I'd love to see it, it bet it flys! (no pun I heard this bumble-bee was just a rumor, a joke. There is a very significant difference between designing a neural network with the same number of neurons as a bee and making an actual model of a bee's brain using a connectionist system. Jerry