Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: 3demo program, really Subject line
Message-ID: <14711@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 26 Sep 88 09:48:10 GMT
References: <8809101533.AA21029@philmds.dts.philips.nl> <1020@vsi1.UUCP> <1571@ficc.uu.net> <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> <426@gonzo.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 9
In-reply-to: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower)

In article <426@gonzo.UUCP>, daveb@gonzo (Dave Brower) writes:
>No thanks.  A lot of archiving gets an Index from the Subject line.
>Without differences between parts 1 and N of a multipart posting in the
>Subject, it would be really hard to figure out what was what.

With an extra "Part: ##" heading, automatic archiving could proceed
just as nicely.

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720