Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hp-sde!hpcea!hpausla!cjh
From: cjh@hpausla.HP.COM (Clifford Heath)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: comp.4gl ????
Message-ID: <2820002@hpausla.HP.COM>
Date: 26 Sep 88 06:09:13 GMT
Organization: HP Australian Software Operation
Lines: 12

With all the traffic about 4gl's (especially Informix) recently,
how about creating comp.4gl?  I mean, there are now quite a few 4gl's
that don't come from database vendors, so including 4gl talk in
comp.databases is really a bit wrong.

Who knows, perhaps the recent articles could have been relegated
to comp.4gl.bugs.

What do you think?  I'm for comp.4gl; I'd use & read it daily.

Clifford Heath, Hewlett Packard Australian Software Operation.
(UUCP: hplabs!hpfcla!hpausla!cjh, ACSnet: cjh@hpausla.oz)