Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!teknowledge-vaxc!sri-unix!garth!smryan
From: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Randomness, the universe, and Turing machines
Summary: Full Circle?
Message-ID: <1451@garth.UUCP>
Date: 21 Sep 88 20:35:30 GMT
References: <1369@garth.UUCP> <2346@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <1383@garth.UUCP> <936@l.cc.purdue.edu> <1024@leah.Albany.Edu>
Reply-To: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Organization: INTERGRAPH (APD) -- Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 9

>must conclude in the end that he has no way to test the theory.
>  And if it ain't testable, it ain't science (ref:  your introductory methods
>textbook from ___101).

Does this mean we're back to belief systems again?

--------------------------------------------------
Of course, `what is the answer to this question'
has another answer: Shut up.