Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!occrsh!uokmax!rob From: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K Shull) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Computer for the rest of us? Message-ID: <1807@uokmax.UUCP> Date: 27 Sep 88 15:16:13 GMT References: <430043@hpcea.CE.HP.COM> <11540170@hpsmtc1.HP.COM> <264@rna.UUCP> <1803@uokmax.UUCP> <70321@sun.uucp> Reply-To: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K Shull) Organization: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Lines: 20 In article <70321@sun.uucp> chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: >>Personally, I think the minimum Personal Workstation is a Sun 4 with a 25 > >Definitely a Nice toy. But what does this have to do with Macintoshes? > Maybe I should have put TWO lines of smileys. Allow me to explain. My reply was to someone who claimed that the "minimum acceptable system" is a Mac II with 2 megs and a 90 meg hard drive. This struck as a bit odd. While I'm sure that there are applications that require this, I imagine that there are a lot of people with Commodore 64's, Apple 2's, PC XT's, etc., etc. that still need to be informed that there systems are unacceptable. >Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM Delphi: CHUQ >Editor/Publisher, OtherRealms -- Robert K. Shull University of Oklahoma, Engineering Computer Network att!occrsh!uokmax!rob or sun!texsun!uokmax!rob