Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!mit-vax!mit-eddie!killer!pollux!dalsqnt!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Why is net noise tolerated?
Message-ID: <7213@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 28 Sep 88 04:53:51 GMT
References: <285@sulaco.UUCP> <5651@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Organization: HASA, "S" Division
Lines: 23

In article <5651@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> loci@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Chuck Brunow) writes:
>	The relationship of Guinn's posting to net.admin is rather vague,
>	but it does touch on several subjects which have been recently
>	raised in this group which deserve comment. It also represents
>	an example of the kind of personal attacks which serve no purpose
>	but are all too frequently posted to the net.

the relationship of allen's posting to news.admin [ having not been
net.admin for quite some time ;-) ] is that you are being accused of
committing a felony under texas state law, to wit, "harmful access to
a computer".  this severe infraction of the law on your part is being
given as an example of behavior which exists on the net.

your hypocrisy is being noted.  your sole saving grace is that the
owners of the systems in question have not yet pressed charges against
you.  you have been asked to refute this information.  we would like
to see your explaination of this incident.  surely you have a story
you would like to tell us.
-- 
John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US)                   HASA, "S" Division

      "Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same
                   entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias