Checksum: 23441
Path: utzoo!utgpu!sarathy
From: sarathy@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Rajiv Sarathy)
Date: Mon, 19-Sep-88 13:19:58 EDT
Message-ID: <1988Sep19.131958.28665@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu>
Organization: University of Toronto Computing Services
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Apple/Microsoft dispute (was Re: SEA & I'm not happy!)
References: <4574232@ <16800358@clio> <925@psu-cs.UUCP> <8996@cup.portal.com> <1988Sep13.185106.14193@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <1894@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> <24945@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: sarathy@gpu.utcs.UUCP (Rajiv Sarathy)

In article <24945@bu-cs.BU.EDU> madd@bu-it.bu.edu (Jim Frost) writes:
>In article <1894@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> anand@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Anand Iyengar) writes:
>|In article <1988Sep13.185106.14193@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> sarathy@gpu.utcs.UUCP (Rajiv Sarathy) writes:
>|	Au contraire:  it's good for Apple, who stole it from Xerox, who's
>|to weak to sue them...
>
>Apple bought the technology from Xerox, they didn't steal it.  Then
>they improved it a lot.  Suddenly everyone is saying "hey, neat, let's
>do that" and Apple's upset.  That's business.
>

Hey wait a minute!! I didn't write that, I said nothing about Xerox.  The
lines you have above were written by someone else (Mohan somebody-or-other, I
believe.)

Get your facts right, and stop quoting people you don't mean to quote. ie. Learn
to use your editor correctly.

What I said was that Apple has every right to sue Microsoft for what's theirs.
Mohan somebody-or-other, incorrectly I gather, stated the above, (what you say 
I said).

Maybe I should sue you for mis-quoting me in public.  Maybe Mohan somebody-or-
other should sue you for taking a piece of his article (which he automatically
has copyright for in Canada) and not giving him any credit!! :-))

--Raj

-----
Disclaimer:  I'm just an undergrad.
-----
Email address: sarathy@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu  --  NOT what's above