Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!spdcc!dyer From: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Net.Porn ? Summary: my two cents :-) Message-ID: <1932@spdcc.COM> Date: 25 Sep 88 18:38:47 GMT References: <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM> <7232@gryphon.CTS.COM> Reply-To: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Distribution: na Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA Lines: 12 In article <7232@gryphon.CTS.COM> mhnadel@gryphon.CTS.COM (Miriam Nadel) writes: >BTW, I suspect you read neither soc.motss or soc.women if you think they >are "adult theme." Soc.motss could be considered to have an "adult theme" if you define it as a bunch of adults acting like intelligent adults talking about matters of interest to adults in an adult manner. Bad stuff, and surely outside the mainstream... -- Steve Dyer dyer@harvard.harvard.edu dyer@spdcc.COM aka {harvard,husc6,linus,ima,bbn,m2c,mipseast}!spdcc!dyer