Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!jm7e+ From: jm7e+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU ("Jeremy G. Mereness") Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: re: Apple //c+ Message-ID: <8XBHISy00XoIQBUFEz@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: 19 Sep 88 16:26:06 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 14 My point about the //c+ is two fold. I am not trying to downplay the //c, as I have one. The problem is.... #1 Sales of the //c have always been less than the //e because of the lack of expansion slots and the case does not allow schools to secure them. This is why a //c is currently cheaper than a driveless //e #2 Apple could have come out with a gs+ THIS YEAR! They HAVE the designs NOW! and Why, for example, does the //c+ not have a 65c816? or a SCSI port? That's all. jm7e+@andrew.cmu.edu