Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pyrdc!pyrnj!rutgers!att!whuts!wv
From: wv@whuts.UUCP (DUNCAN)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Net.Porn ?
Keywords: porn, underage, lawsuit
Message-ID: <4805@whuts.UUCP>
Date: 23 Sep 88 10:53:01 GMT
References: <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: wv@whuts.UUCP (54299-DUNCAN,W.)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany, NJ
Lines: 12

In article <1278@cbnews.ATT.COM> wbt@cbnews.ATT.COM (William B. Thacker) writes:
>a future target of "anti-porn" crusaders. All it would take would be
>one closed-minded fundamentalist finding out that 12-year-olds with
>computers and modems can get access to alt.sex, soc.motss, soc.women,
>and other "adult theme" groups.

Soc.women?! Soc.motss?! You're kidding, right? What do you think goes 
on there? There's a big difference between the restriction of pornography
and the restriction of information. 

						Bill Duncan
						att!whuts!wv