Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!occrsh!uokmax!rob
From: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K Shull)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Computer for the rest of us?
Message-ID: <1807@uokmax.UUCP>
Date: 27 Sep 88 15:16:13 GMT
References: <430043@hpcea.CE.HP.COM> <11540170@hpsmtc1.HP.COM> <264@rna.UUCP> <1803@uokmax.UUCP> <70321@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K Shull)
Organization: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Lines: 20

In article <70321@sun.uucp> chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) writes:
>>Personally, I think the minimum Personal Workstation is a Sun 4 with a 25
>
>Definitely a Nice toy. But what does this have to do with Macintoshes?
>

Maybe I should have put TWO lines of smileys. Allow me to explain.
My reply was to someone who claimed that the "minimum acceptable system"
is a Mac II with 2 megs and a 90 meg hard drive. This struck as a bit
odd. While I'm sure that there are applications that require this, I
imagine that there are a lot of people with Commodore 64's, Apple 2's,
PC XT's, etc., etc. that still need to be informed that there systems
are unacceptable.

>Chuq Von Rospach			chuq@sun.COM		Delphi: CHUQ
>Editor/Publisher, OtherRealms
-- 
Robert K. Shull
University of Oklahoma, Engineering Computer Network
att!occrsh!uokmax!rob or sun!texsun!uokmax!rob