Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!steinmetz!vdsvax!barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com
From: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: System V Release 4.0 Developer Conferences
Message-ID: <5634@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 28 Sep 88 09:17:31 GMT
References: <167@hsi86.hsi.UUCP> <1988Sep22.173745.14647@utzoo.uucp> <8570@smoke.ARPA> <1988Sep26.213223.407@utzoo.uucp> <9733@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Sender: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com
Reply-To: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett)
Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: greg@orbity.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Greg Cooper)


In article <1988Sep26.213223.407@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>quoting a friend of his...
>
>ABI implies that a conforming machine must have kernel support for both 
>NeWS *and* X.  This is ridiculous for people who plan to run neither.

I heard it as:

	If the V5R4 unix supports ANY window system, it has to support
	both X and NeWS.
--