Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!rutgers!att!ihlpm!jmdavis
From: jmdavis@ihlpm.ATT.COM (Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CMI 68000 2x
Summary: benchmarks, here here!
Message-ID: <2368@ihlpm.ATT.COM>
Date: 26 Sep 88 16:35:35 GMT
References: <3372@crash.cts.com>, 
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 19

In article , mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes:

> 
> Could you post some benchmarks to validate this claim?  The CMI board sounds
> interesting, but I wouldn't consider buying it without having heard hard facts
> 
> 

Yes, I too am in favor of benchmarks, if they are good I would seriously
consider buying this product. So please post them to the net.

BTW, I originally tried to reply to one of the CMI folks who posted to
this thread, but my mailer bounced it.

-- 
________________________________________
					|	Mike Davis
					|	..!att!ihlpm!jmdavis
				 	|_________________________