From | Subject | Date |
wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
16 Sep 88 04:58:16 GMT |
wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
16 Sep 88 05:06:34 GMT |
eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) |
Re: why column arrays in Fortran (was opinions on computer languages)
|
18 Sep 88 07:51:34 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1
|
18 Sep 88 08:45:38 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
18 Sep 88 22:55:31 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1
|
18 Sep 88 23:07:58 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Exception handling (was Fortran vs
|
19 Sep 88 01:14:03 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: PL/I performance
|
19 Sep 88 01:16:25 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran 8X
|
19 Sep 88 01:33:58 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1
|
19 Sep 88 18:59:10 GMT |
psmith@mozart.uucp (Presley Smith) |
FORTRAN 8x Status Update
|
19 Sep 88 22:26:48 GMT |
chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 05:18:56 GMT |
link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu (Richard Link) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
20 Sep 88 06:54:58 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
20 Sep 88 07:34:43 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 07:17:42 GMT |
stevek@squid.ucsb.edu (Steve Keifling) |
Fortran-77 for Suns
|
20 Sep 88 07:27:50 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Just the facts ma'am (Re: Link on _TRUTH_)
|
20 Sep 88 17:16:51 GMT |
afd@mruxd.UUCP (A Dietz) |
Wanted: Fortran graphics library for pc
|
16 Sep 88 15:21:02 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 15:32:08 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
20 Sep 88 13:56:11 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
20 Sep 88 14:11:38 GMT |
dorn@fabscal.UUCP (Alan Dorn Hetzel) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
19 Sep 88 15:12:43 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 01:57:17 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 02:05:17 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 03:50:54 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
*THE SPECIAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
21 Sep 88 05:22:57 GMT |
lfm@fpssun.fps.com (Larry Meadows) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
19 Sep 88 19:39:47 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 08:36:45 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
21 Sep 88 09:04:42 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
21 Sep 88 09:10:54 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
21 Sep 88 18:44:43 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 19:02:30 GMT |
francis@proxftl.UUCP (Francis H. Yu) |
Re: C associativity rules
|
21 Sep 88 17:22:51 GMT |
mike@arizona.edu (Mike Coffin) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 18:09:11 GMT |
lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
19 Sep 88 18:59:50 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
19 Sep 88 19:50:18 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
19 Sep 88 20:08:46 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
19 Sep 88 20:28:32 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 04:18:34 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 18:22:37 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 18:30:29 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
20 Sep 88 19:06:26 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
20 Sep 88 22:40:47 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: *THE SPECIAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
21 Sep 88 19:14:34 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 19:22:51 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
21 Sep 88 19:46:54 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 20:03:52 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 20:22:41 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
21 Sep 88 20:40:42 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: operator syntax
|
20 Sep 88 16:12:56 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 14:18:31 GMT |
ins_aejs@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Edward Sullivan) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
19 Sep 88 17:47:02 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 15:09:16 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 15:18:33 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
21 Sep 88 23:23:39 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Function call optimisations (was Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 23:41:24 GMT |
chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) |
`intrinsic' functions in forthcoming C standard
|
22 Sep 88 01:42:50 GMT |
davis@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu (Al Davis) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
22 Sep 88 01:43:49 GMT |
d25001@mic.UUCP (Carrington Dixon) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 03:06:33 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 08:10:01 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 08:14:48 GMT |
thompson@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (Steve Thompson) |
Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1
|
21 Sep 88 15:13:52 GMT |
lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
21 Sep 88 16:25:59 GMT |
lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 16:06:07 GMT |
davis@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu (Al Davis) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
21 Sep 88 01:25:37 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 22:33:15 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Side effects in functions - the special case
|
21 Sep 88 22:52:11 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
22 Sep 88 15:34:30 GMT |
scf@statware.UUCP (Steve Fullerton) |
Re: function side effects (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
20 Sep 88 15:26:13 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
*THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
21 Sep 88 21:49:04 GMT |
chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) |
Function call optimisations (was Re: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
21 Sep 88 18:43:04 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Data types _without_ pointers
|
22 Sep 88 18:10:07 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
22 Sep 88 18:22:45 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: `intrinsic' functions in forthcoming C standard
|
22 Sep 88 18:35:13 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
22 Sep 88 18:52:14 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
22 Sep 88 19:00:46 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Side effects in functions - the special case
|
22 Sep 88 19:05:41 GMT |
E8D@PSUVM.BITNET |
Lahey F77L vers. 3.0
|
22 Sep 88 14:06:26 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
22 Sep 88 23:44:32 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: Side effects in functions - the special case
|
22 Sep 88 15:45:46 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
22 Sep 88 16:32:33 GMT |
dodson@mozart.uucp (Dave Dodson) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
22 Sep 88 14:22:09 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
21 Sep 88 23:17:54 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
My widget is more portable than yours (was Fortan versus C)
|
23 Sep 88 00:25:53 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Confused about optimizing 1-COS(X)*COS(X)
|
23 Sep 88 00:30:08 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
23 Sep 88 01:18:10 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
23 Sep 88 01:23:36 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
23 Sep 88 01:36:26 GMT |
jones@ingr.UUCP (Mark Jones) |
Re: C associativity rules
|
22 Sep 88 14:45:52 GMT |
chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) |
fifo queue (was Data types _without_ pointers)
|
23 Sep 88 16:33:24 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: My widget is more portable than yours (was Fortan versus C)
|
23 Sep 88 20:25:12 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Confused about optimizing 1-COS(X)*COS(X)
|
23 Sep 88 20:33:21 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
23 Sep 88 20:54:41 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
23 Sep 88 21:05:57 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
22 Sep 88 19:17:49 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
23 Sep 88 15:56:04 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
23 Sep 88 18:51:03 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
23 Sep 88 21:23:05 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
23 Sep 88 21:41:06 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
23 Sep 88 21:48:31 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
23 Sep 88 14:51:10 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: data types without pointers
|
24 Sep 88 00:37:25 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: My widget is more portable than yours (was Fortan versus C)
|
24 Sep 88 00:49:47 GMT |
bga@raspail.UUCP (Bruce Albrecht) |
Re: Arrays and pointers
|
22 Sep 88 21:26:03 GMT |
hjm@cernvax.UUCP (Hubert Matthews) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
23 Sep 88 13:29:58 GMT |
warner@hydrovax.nmt.edu (M. Warner Losh) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
23 Sep 88 19:19:24 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: data types without pointers
|
24 Sep 88 15:45:53 GMT |
lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) |
Re: Side Effects of FORTRAN Functions
|
24 Sep 88 17:55:23 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
24 Sep 88 20:11:20 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: My widget is more portable than yours (was Fortan versus C)
|
23 Sep 88 22:23:29 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Portability/Standard Conforming/Giles
|
23 Sep 88 22:52:50 GMT |
fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov.nas.nasa.gov (Marty Fouts) |
Re: Confused about optimizing 1-COS(X)*COS(X)
|
23 Sep 88 22:55:27 GMT |
hirchert@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu |
Side Effects of FORTRAN Functions
|
22 Sep 88 20:02:00 GMT |
chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) |
The spectre of aliasing
|
25 Sep 88 03:04:35 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: data types without pointers
|
24 Sep 88 21:32:06 GMT |
jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) |
Re: Side Effects of FORTRAN Functions
|
24 Sep 88 21:43:19 GMT |
lagache@violet.berkeley.edu (Edouard Lagache) |
A Separate European FORTRAN standard? Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!
|
25 Sep 88 18:01:45 GMT |
ags@h.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) |
Re: *THE GENERAL CASE* (was: function side effects)
|
26 Sep 88 03:29:09 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: intrinsic functions, math operators (was: i++, i+=1, i=i+1)
|
24 Sep 88 14:18:26 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
24 Sep 88 14:44:21 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran vs C for computations
|
25 Sep 88 07:29:44 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
25 Sep 88 07:46:13 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
pointers (was Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal)
|
25 Sep 88 08:01:45 GMT |
cik@l.cc.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) |
We need pointers
|
25 Sep 88 12:51:44 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
23 Sep 88 02:44:30 GMT |
seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
26 Sep 88 00:27:40 GMT |
cca@pur-phy (Charles C. Allen) |
Data types, pointers, etc.
|
27 Sep 88 01:24:20 GMT |
cdb@hpclcdb.HP.COM (Carl Burch) |
ISO Fortran 8x Meeting (long)
|
27 Sep 88 00:55:22 GMT |
ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) |
Re: Data types, pointers, etc.
|
27 Sep 88 19:45:22 GMT |
dietrich@cernvax.UUCP (Dietrich Wiegandt) |
Report on WG5 meeting in Paris
|
27 Sep 88 07:53:35 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: My widget is more portable than yours (was Fortan versus C)
|
26 Sep 88 13:21:25 GMT |
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
26 Sep 88 13:33:53 GMT |
ka@june.cs.washington.edu (Kenneth Almquist) |
Re: Data types _without_ pointers
|
28 Sep 88 19:34:34 GMT |
ok@quintus |
Pointers in Fortran
|
28 Sep 88 06:48:02 GMT |
hirchert@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu |
Re: Fortran versus C for numerical anal
|
28 Sep 88 14:41:00 GMT |