Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!nrl-cmf!cmcl2!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!ihlpl!knudsen From: knudsen@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Knudsen) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: space news from Aug 15 AW&ST Summary: Re-entry danger? Message-ID: <6768@ihlpl.ATT.COM> Date: 19 Sep 88 16:49:51 GMT References: <1988Sep12.032459.25617@utzoo.uucp> <972@netxcom.UUCP> <1988Sep17.222225.9422@utzoo.uucp> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 11 In article <1988Sep17.222225.9422@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes: > highly reliable solution to the reboost/de-orbit problem -- NASA is > paranoid about a repetition of Skylab. Is an ET much of a threat if it re-enters at an unpredictable time? Are there any massive solid parts of it that would reach the ground in one piece at high velocity, like the Skylab's telescope mount? Overall the ET is pretty flimsy. There might be some 17-inch valves -- pretty heavy stuff, but maybe these are all on the orbiter. Would appreciate the facts from one who knows. Thanks, mike k