Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!teknowledge-vaxc!sri-unix!garth!smryan From: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Randomness, the universe, and Turing machines Summary: Full Circle? Message-ID: <1451@garth.UUCP> Date: 21 Sep 88 20:35:30 GMT References: <1369@garth.UUCP> <2346@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <1383@garth.UUCP> <936@l.cc.purdue.edu> <1024@leah.Albany.Edu> Reply-To: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) Organization: INTERGRAPH (APD) -- Palo Alto, CA Lines: 9 >must conclude in the end that he has no way to test the theory. > And if it ain't testable, it ain't science (ref: your introductory methods >textbook from ___101). Does this mean we're back to belief systems again? -------------------------------------------------- Of course, `what is the answer to this question' has another answer: Shut up.