Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:3387 comp.unix.microport:1584 comp.databases:1403
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pacbell!belltec!dar
From: dar@belltec.UUCP (Dimitri Rotow)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,comp.databases
Subject: Re: FoxBASE+
Summary: Foxbase should work fine on 3.2
Message-ID: <269@belltec.UUCP>
Date: 20 Sep 88 15:45:44 GMT
References: <7341@cdin-1.uucp> <5138@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> <857@viscous> <334@telly.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Technologies, Fremont, CA
Lines: 13

In article <334@telly.UUCP>, evan@telly.UUCP (Evan Leibovitch) writes:
... [ discusses FoxBASE porting schedule] ...
> 
> If Tim's schedule is true, then there is not even a port being developed
> in time for the Xenix/Unix merged 386 product.
> 

The merged product, Release 3.2, should run FoxBASE without any changes
to the existing binary.  If it doesn't, then Release 3.2 should be fixed,
not FoxBASE.  I believe (caveat emptor until final release!) that 3.2
has already been tested with FoxBASE.

- Dimitri Rotow