Xref: utzoo comp.bugs.sys5:590 comp.unix.questions:9466 comp.unix.xenix:3465
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bu-cs!mirror!redsox!campbell
From: campbell@redsox.UUCP (Larry Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: inode amnesia, no disk space and uucico
Message-ID: <454@redsox.UUCP>
Date: 28 Sep 88 18:21:16 GMT
References: <585@elandes.UUCP> <58@n8ino.UUCP> <587@elandes.UUCP>
Reply-To: campbell@redsox.UUCP (Larry Campbell)
Organization: The Boston Software Works, Inc.
Lines: 10

In article <587@elandes.UUCP> dave@elandes.UUCP (D. Mathis) writes:
}
}I guess I didn't make my main concern evident.  The real problem is not
}the lost inodes, I know that at times the kernel loses track of the free
}list.  The REAL PROBLEM is that uucico doesn't check for valid writes
}when it is receiving files, thereby creating any number of 'valid' 0 length
}files.  I beleive it should fail on the write and fail on the receive. 

Get Honey DanBer.  Probably the single most winning feature of HDB is that
it Does The Right Thing when the disk fills up.