Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!nud!anasaz!john From: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Radar Message-ID: <1256@anasaz.UUCP> Date: 18 Sep 88 15:18:48 GMT References: <12462@duke.cs.duke.edu> Reply-To: john@anasaz.UUCP (John Moore) Distribution: na Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ Lines: 25 Summary:Read rec.autos In article <12462@duke.cs.duke.edu> gazit@bein.UUCP (Hillel Gazit) writes: ] ]I was caught by a police radar which claimed that I was going 65 MPH. ]My speed was 55 MPH. I think that something was wrong with the radar, ]so I want to challenge the policeman in court. ] ]Can someone please post a list of things that can wrong with a radar? ](I want to ask the policeman if he is absolutly sure that his radar ]was OK, and then ask him to ]explain to me why cannot all the things on the list happen). Go to rec.auto - you should be able to get knowledgable help there. ] ]Can someone post, in addition, what went wrong with the radar of the ship ]that has shot down the Iranian airliner? ](I want to ask the policeman how comes his radar cannot make any mistakes, ]when the radar of a very expensive warship has made them.) Apparently the radar did not make mistakes. It was a collection of human errors. -- John Moore (NJ7E) {decvax, ncar, ihnp4}!noao!nud!anasaz!john (602) 861-7607 (day or eve) {gatech, ames, rutgers}!ncar!... The opinions expressed here are obviously not mine, so they must be someone else's.