Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!strath-cs!glasgow!gilbert
From: gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Ontological status of sci.philosophy.tech
Message-ID: <1657@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>
Date: 23 Sep 88 11:18:35 GMT
References: <1632@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <14572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton)
Organization: Comp Sci, Glasgow Univ, Scotland
Lines: 8

In article <14572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes:
>This and the resurrected "free will vs determinism vs quantum mechanics"
>debate are probably more appropriate to sci.philosophy.tech.
... and alt.weemba.sheep, and alt.flame.weemba, and alt.weemba.flame, 
but especially uk.yb-users! :-)
-- 
Gilbert Cockton, Department of Computing Science,  The University, Glasgow
	gilbert@uk.ac.glasgow.cs !ukc!glasgow!gilbert