Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!agate!garnet!weemba From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: 3demo program, really Subject line Message-ID: <14711@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 26 Sep 88 09:48:10 GMT References: <8809101533.AA21029@philmds.dts.philips.nl> <1020@vsi1.UUCP> <1571@ficc.uu.net> <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> <426@gonzo.UUCP> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central Lines: 9 In-reply-to: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower) In article <426@gonzo.UUCP>, daveb@gonzo (Dave Brower) writes: >No thanks. A lot of archiving gets an Index from the Subject line. >Without differences between parts 1 and N of a multipart posting in the >Subject, it would be really hard to figure out what was what. With an extra "Part: ##" heading, automatic archiving could proceed just as nicely. ucbvax!garnet!weemba Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720