Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!jm7e+
From: jm7e+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU ("Jeremy G. Mereness")
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: re: Apple //c+
Message-ID: <8XBHISy00XoIQBUFEz@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 19 Sep 88 16:26:06 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14


My point about the //c+ is two fold. I am not trying to downplay the //c,
as I have one. The problem is....

#1 Sales of the //c have always been less than the //e because of the lack of
expansion slots and the case does not allow schools to secure them. This is why
a //c is currently cheaper than a driveless //e

#2 Apple could have come out with a gs+ THIS YEAR! They HAVE the designs NOW!
and Why, for example, does the //c+ not have a 65c816? or a SCSI port?

That's all.

jm7e+@andrew.cmu.edu