Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!vector!rpp386!jfh From: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: 3demo program, really Subject line Message-ID: <7181@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 27 Sep 88 14:37:59 GMT References: <8809101533.AA21029@philmds.dts.philips.nl> <1020@vsi1.UUCP> <1571@ficc.uu.net> <469@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> <426@gonzo.UUCP> <1 Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum) Organization: HASA, "S" Division Lines: 12 In article <14711@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes: >With an extra "Part: ##" heading, automatic archiving could proceed >just as nicely. the Archive-name: header which rich $alz and brandon add to their postings makes automatic archiving a snap. now, can they just remove the "part" stuff from the Subject: line??? -- John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US) HASA, "S" Division "Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias