Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:1601 comp.sys.intel:535
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ncar!ico!rcd
From: rcd@ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Pity the poor 286 folk
Summary: wanna trade?
Message-ID: <9695@ico.ISC.COM>
Date: 22 Sep 88 04:24:25 GMT
References: <326@siswat.UUCP> <472@uport.UUCP>
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp, Boulder, CO
Lines: 23

John Plocher was following along the 286 virtual memory and virtual/real
bug discussion when he said:

> This is really moot, tho, because the 386 has none of these problems [but
> it has a few of its own], and a 386 box onow costs the same as a 286 system
> did a year ago...

Sure, but that doesn't mean it costs as much as a 286 box today.  More to
the point, a 386 box costs a lot of money and I already have a 286 box, so
the 386 isn't of any help.  [This is me personally, not me as part of ISC!]

I hope Microport isn't planning to leave 286 users out in the cold just
because the 386 is in vogue...there are a lot of 286 boxen out there
(aren't there? I hope?! hello?) which want a good UNIX.  Saying, "Hey, just
change the memory (and add some more) and change the processor/motherboard"
isn't a useful response.  I want to upgrade software (from 2.2.0!), not
hardware.

Of course, if somebody wants to trade me even, 286 for 386 motherboard, I'm
listening!
-- 
Dick Dunn      UUCP: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd           (303)449-2870
   ...Worst-case analysis must never begin with "No one would ever want..."