Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:3056 comp.unix.microport:1365 news.groups:5199
Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!van-bc!sl
From: sl@van-bc.UUCP (pri=-10 Stuart Lynne)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups
Subject: Re: new groups for iX86 unix (was: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3)
Message-ID: <1859@van-bc.UUCP>
Date: 20 Aug 88 05:59:38 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Aug16.011817.17102@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <593@morticia.cme-durer.ARPA> <55@volition.dec.com> <1988Aug19.122042.19070@ateng.uucp>
Reply-To: sl@van-bc.UUCP (pri=-10 Stuart Lynne)
Organization: Wimsey Associates, Vancouver, BC.
Lines: 18

In article <1988Aug19.122042.19070@ateng.uucp> chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>    comp.unix.xenix         Microsoft Xenix and its derivatives
>    comp.unix.sysv.i286     AT&T Unix System V for the '286
>    comp.unix.sysv.i386     AT&T Unix System V for the '386 

I agree, with one slight extension:

    comp.unix.sysv.i386     AT&T Unix System V for the '386 and Merged Xenix

For the 286 systems, we need two groups, one for Xenix, and one for System
V. 

For 386 we need (hopefully) only one group, for System V, and the merged
Xenix system we are all waiting for with baited breath.


-- 
Stuart.Lynne@wimsey.bc.ca {ubc-cs,uunet}!van-bc!sl     Vancouver,BC,604-937-7532