Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2969 comp.unix.microport:1266 news.groups:5127 Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!amdahl!pacbell!belltec!dar From: dar@belltec.UUCP (Dimitri Rotow) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3 Summary: Yes! a 386 group for 386 users Message-ID: <253@belltec.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 88 01:31:46 GMT References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <550@pcrat.UUCP> Organization: Bell Technologies, Fremont, CA Lines: 10 In article <550@pcrat.UUCP>, rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes: > In article <404@uport.UUCP> plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes: > > > With the impending merge of UNIX, it makes more sense to just break > the groups as "i286" and "i386". > Yes! At least the "generic" UNIX's are more alike than different on the 80386. Release 3.2 will make it even more so (and whether you get it from Interactive, Microport or anyone else, Release 3.2 is a *barnburner*!).