Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!sdrc!scjones From: scjones@sdrc.UUCP (Larry Jones) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Syntax of function prototypes... Message-ID: <354@sdrc.UUCP> Date: 21 Aug 88 16:56:09 GMT References: <8808171403.AA05181@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <6105@venera.isi.edu> <13114@mimsy.UUCP> Organization: Structural Dynamics Research Corp., Cincinnati Lines: 14 In article <13114@mimsy.UUCP>, chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes: > [ not allowing "int foo(...);" is a mistake ] The reason that form is disallowed is because themacros require the last argument before the ellipsis as an argument. The reason the macros require it is because some implimentors insisted they could not do varargs without it. ---- Larry Jones UUCP: uunet!sdrc!scjones SDRC scjones@sdrc 2000 Eastman Dr. BIX: ltl Milford, OH 45150 AT&T: (513) 576-2070 Nancy Reagan on superconductivity: "Just say mho."