Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!uport!plocher From: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3 Message-ID: <412@uport.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 88 02:48:05 GMT References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Jul30.141708.3175@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <86@jetson. <550@pcrat.UUCP> Reply-To: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) Organization: Microport Systems, Scotts Valley, CA Lines: 17 In article <550@pcrat.UUCP> rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes: >In article <404@uport.UUCP> plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes: >> I didn't think so. Try comp.unix.xenix (or even better, try email) >Cross posting to .xenix and .microport is needed these days, since Cross posting between c.u.xenix and c.u.microport is never needed, *please*. Those that care about xenix *ONLY* matters read .xenix (I do), those that care about uport *ONLY* matters read .microport, and those who care about both read both. The articles I was following up to didn't have anything to do with microport, Vr3.2, microport vs xenix, or even general x86 matters. They were all simply rather warm followups to Woods' anti-xenix postings. -John Plocher (this message was composed while wearing the boots of "former moderator", not as "current uport employee")