Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!shukra!ram From: ram%shukra@Sun.COM (Renu Raman) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: IBM bashing / OSF / SVID / added pennies Message-ID: <64524@sun.uucp> Date: 17 Aug 88 02:17:42 GMT References: <16792@adm.ARPA> <1260@ficc.UUCP> <3660@bsu-cs.UUCP> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: ram@sun.UUCP (Renu Raman) Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View Lines: 15 In article <3660@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes: >In article <1260@ficc.UUCP> peter@ficc.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: >>And we're talking about a different CP/M, too. I don't recall any serious >>deficiencies in CP/M that weren't shared by the early PC-DOS... > >CP/M had no expandability. With MS-DOS you *began* with 64 K, >remember? With CP/M, you finished there. > If you want more than 64K, there is a way. You can have banks of 64K memory and switch between them. My Visual 1050 has 128K (2 banks) + 32K for display and I believe, I can add another 128K to it. >-- >Rahul Dhesi UUCP:!{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!dhesi