Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!uport!plocher
From: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3
Message-ID: <412@uport.UUCP>
Date: 10 Aug 88 02:48:05 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Jul30.141708.3175@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <86@jetson. <550@pcrat.UUCP>
Reply-To: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Organization: Microport Systems, Scotts Valley, CA
Lines: 17

In article <550@pcrat.UUCP> rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes:
>In article <404@uport.UUCP> plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes:
>>	I didn't think so.  Try comp.unix.xenix (or even better, try email)
>Cross posting to .xenix and .microport is needed these days, since

Cross posting between c.u.xenix and c.u.microport is never needed, *please*.
Those that care about xenix *ONLY* matters read .xenix (I do), those that
care about uport *ONLY* matters read .microport, and those who care about
both read both.

The articles I was following up to didn't have anything to do with microport,
Vr3.2, microport vs xenix, or even general x86 matters.  They were all simply
rather warm followups to Woods' anti-xenix postings.

   -John Plocher
    (this message was composed while wearing the boots of "former moderator",
     not as "current uport employee")