Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!ima!haddock!karl
From: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Syntax of function prototypes...
Message-ID: <6264@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Date: 19 Aug 88 16:09:00 GMT
References: <8808171403.AA05181@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <6105@venera.isi.edu> <871@buengc.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: karl@haddock.isc.com (Karl Heuer)
Organization: Interactive Systems, Boston
Lines: 8

In article <871@buengc.BU.EDU> bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>Am I missing something or is "int something();" just as good (for a
>prototype) (except for [style])?

You are missing something.  "int something();" is not a prototype; that word
is reserved for the new syntax.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint