Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!gatech!gt-eedsp!jensen
From: jensen@gt-eedsp.UUCP (P. Allen Jensen)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Problem compiling X11R2 on Multiflow under BSD4.3
Summary: R3 version of XtOffset does not solve problem
Message-ID: <392@gt-eedsp.UUCP>
Date: 16 Aug 88 12:57:46 GMT
References: <8808152028.AA18193@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 17

In article <8808152028.AA18193@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU>, jim@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Jim Fulton) writes:
> 
> The R2 XtOffset macro causes compilers that are fairly picky about pointer
> arithmetic to complain.  The following version will be used in R3:
> 
> 	#define XtOffset(type,field) \
> 	        ((unsigned int) (((caddr_t) (&(((type)NULL)->field))) - \
> 	                         ((caddr_t) NULL)))


Unfortunately, the new macro does not correct the problem.  Is the
Multiflow compiler to picky ?
-- 
P. Allen Jensen
Georgia Tech, School of Electrical Engineering, Atlanta, GA  30332-0250
USENET: ...!{allegra,hplabs,ihnp4,ulysses}!gatech!gt-eedsp!jensen
INTERNET: jensen@gteedsp.gatech.edu