Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rds@moss.ATT.COM From: rds@moss.ATT.COM Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Overloading resolution Message-ID: <31106@clyde.ATT.COM> Date: 10 Aug 88 18:26:01 GMT Sender: nuucp@clyde.ATT.COM Reply-To: rds@clyde.ATT.COM (Richard DeSimine) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ Lines: 12 I stand corrected. According to LRM 4.10(6) the expression -15 alone in the previous letter is universal_integer. Its context implies it is whatever [legal] type shares the relational operator, and is evaluated as an INTEGER in the expression "left < -15". Thanks goes to Hannu-Matti Jarvinen and Robert Snyder for the correction and the LRM reference. Rich DeSimine