Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2993 comp.unix.microport:1301 Checksum: 20311 Path: utzoo!utgpu!woods From: woods@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Greg Woods) Date: Tue, 16-Aug-88 01:27:25 EDT Message-ID: <1988Aug16.012725.17667@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> Organization: G. A. W. Constulting Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: Xenix reliability (Was: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3) Summary: Why me? (I asked for it? :-) References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Aug8.201739.4868@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <1257@ficc.UUCP> Reply-To: woods@gpu.utcs.Toronto.EDU (Greg Woods) In article <1257@ficc.UUCP> peter@ficc.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: >In article ... woods@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Greg Woods) writes about how >HP systems are more reliable than UNIX: I'm not sure how these things happen.... I've never used an HP system in my life! I don't even like their calculators! :-) (The workstation I saw recently turned my crank though) I think the article in question my have mentioned the SUN I'm writing this on? It now says: % uptime 1:21am up 61 days, 17:38, 3 users, load average: 3.05, 2.25, 1.29 % uname -a gpu.utcs gpu.utcs 4.2BSD vm sun Too bad gpu generates unbearably long article id's. Otherwise I might have traced this one down. I know it takes time, money, and space, but let's not delete too many lines next time! This takes the same kind of resources too! Don't delete artilce id's either. -- Greg Woods. UUCP: utgpu!woods, utgpu!{ontmoh, ontmoh!ixpierre}!woods VOICE: (416) 242-7572 [h] LOCATION: Toronto, Ontario, Canada