Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!shukra!ram
From: ram%shukra@Sun.COM (Renu Raman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: IBM bashing / OSF / SVID / added pennies
Message-ID: <64524@sun.uucp>
Date: 17 Aug 88 02:17:42 GMT
References: <16792@adm.ARPA> <1260@ficc.UUCP> <3660@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: ram@sun.UUCP (Renu Raman)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 15

In article <3660@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>In article <1260@ficc.UUCP> peter@ficc.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>And we're talking about a different CP/M, too. I don't recall any serious
>>deficiencies in CP/M that weren't shared by the early PC-DOS...
>
>CP/M had no expandability.  With MS-DOS you *began* with 64 K,
>remember?  With CP/M, you finished there.
>

    If you want more than 64K, there is a way.  You can have banks of 64K 
    memory and switch between them.  My Visual 1050 has 128K (2 banks)
    + 32K for display and I believe, I can add another 128K to it.

>-- 
>Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  !{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!dhesi