Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!esosun!seismo!uunet!pcrat!rick From: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: .xenix .microport groups Message-ID: <551@pcrat.UUCP> Date: 13 Aug 88 15:24:20 GMT References: <550@pcrat.UUCP> <1259@holos0.UUCP> <11801@steinmetz.ge.com> Reply-To: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) Distribution: na Organization: PC Research, Inc., Tinton Falls, NJ Lines: 21 In article <11801@steinmetz.ge.com> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes: >In article <1259@holos0.UUCP> fsg@holos0.UUCP (Frank Glass) writes: >> With the impending merge of UNIX, it makes more sense to just break >> the groups as "i286" and "i386". > > There is a mailing list for ALL 386 users and issues, formed because >there was not enough separate information for a group just on the 386. Probably was a good idea. But the traffic on 386 is much greater now. Seems a bit silly that users of 386 UNIX must use a mailing list or cross post, while users of specific vendors 286 UNIX's have the luxury of a newsgroup. -- Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 542-3734 (voice, nights) OR (201) 389-8963 (voice, days) uunet!pcrat!rick (UUCP) rick%pcrat.uucp@uunet.uu.net (INTERNET)