Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rds@moss.ATT.COM
From: rds@moss.ATT.COM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Overloading resolution
Message-ID: <31106@clyde.ATT.COM>
Date: 10 Aug 88 18:26:01 GMT
Sender: nuucp@clyde.ATT.COM
Reply-To: rds@clyde.ATT.COM (Richard DeSimine)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ
Lines: 12


I stand corrected.

According to LRM 4.10(6) the expression -15 alone in the previous letter 
is universal_integer. Its context implies it is whatever [legal] type 
shares the relational operator, and is evaluated as an INTEGER in the
expression "left < -15".

Thanks goes to Hannu-Matti Jarvinen and Robert Snyder for the
correction and the LRM reference.

Rich DeSimine