Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!teknowledge-vaxc!sri-unix!quintus!ok
From: ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Split I and D caches and IBM lawyers
Message-ID: <275@quintus.UUCP>
Date: 11 Aug 88 06:27:10 GMT
References: <62370@sun.uucp> <15086@apple.Apple.COM> <62555@sun.uucp> <15129@apple.Apple.COM> <5536@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> <15353@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@quintus.UUCP
Reply-To: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Inc.
Lines: 8

In article <15353@apple.Apple.COM> baum@apple.UUCP (Allen Baum) writes:
>IBM does not patent every innovation. Anyone who has seen the IBM Technical
>Disclosure bulletin would understand that immediately. The Bulletin comes
>out once or twice a month, is a couple of inches thick and full of the ideas
>that they think are clever, but not worth their time to patent.

Sounds great.  (I hope they put software ideas there too!)
What does it cost, and how do I get a sample issue?