Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!motsj1!mcdchg!clyde!watmath!julian!uwovax!7103_300 From: 7103_300@uwovax.uwo.ca (Eric Smith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: How to post umoria? Message-ID: <602@uwovax.uwo.ca> Date: 20 Aug 88 02:02:58 GMT References: <6321@chinet.chi.il.us> <401@clio.math.lsa.umich.edu> Lines: 20 Organisation: University of Western Ontario, Canada In article <401@clio.math.lsa.umich.edu>, hyc@math.lsa.umich.edu (Howard Chu) writes: > Just to start, I could mention that I'm working with GNU's gcc, aiming > at getting it running on TOS and Minix. I know someone has ported the KA9Q > TCP/IP package to the ST finally, though they haven't been talking about it > here, and I haven't seen mention of the source for that yet. A few people > have casually mentioned NetHack 2.3. Has a bug fixed version ever appeared? > Other things I'd like to get working are GNU Make and RCS. (Which would > require working versions of diff and diff3, at least.) Anyone else doing > something they feel like talking about? I've got NetHack 2.3 working on the ST. I want to give it a little time to settle (i.e. to make *sure* all those bugs are out) before posting it, but it seems to be working pretty well. It's *big*, though; nearly 400K just for the executable. Would people rather see a "pared down" version that will run on 520's, or should we go for the full 2.3? -- Eric R. Smith email: Dept. of Mathematics 7103_300@uwovax.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario 7103_300@uwovax.bitnet London, Ont. Canada N6A 5B7 (a shared mailbox: put my name on ph: (519) 661-3638 the Subj: line, please!)