Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2969 comp.unix.microport:1266 news.groups:5127
Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!amdahl!pacbell!belltec!dar
From: dar@belltec.UUCP (Dimitri Rotow)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups
Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3
Summary: Yes! a 386 group for 386 users
Message-ID: <253@belltec.UUCP>
Date: 10 Aug 88 01:31:46 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <550@pcrat.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Technologies, Fremont, CA
Lines: 10

In article <550@pcrat.UUCP>, rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes:
> In article <404@uport.UUCP> plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes:
> >
> With the impending merge of UNIX, it makes more sense to just break
> the groups as "i286" and "i386".
> 

Yes! At least the "generic" UNIX's are more alike than different on the 
80386.  Release 3.2 will make it even more so (and whether you get it from
Interactive, Microport or anyone else, Release 3.2 is a *barnburner*!).