Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!telmail!neabbs!richard From: richard@neabbs.UUCP (RICHARD RONTELTAP) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3 Message-ID: <17639@neabbs.UUCP> Date: 11 Aug 88 00:41:44 GMT Organization: NEABBS multi-line BBS +31-20-717666 (12x), Amsterdam, Holland Lines: 24 (Sorry, can't quote) [ Comparing XENIX <-> Microport <-> Bell Tech is garbage. ] I don't agree. Im using SCO XENIX (working great) and have had NO experience with other UNIX flavours. So I'm following the comparisions/flames/metaphores with great interest. Since UNIXes are (more or less) the same, I would be perfectly willing to step over to another UNIX, for speed, elegance or reliability. Of course everyone submits their own subjecttive view, (I really enjoyed the Farrari <> Cadillac article), but some information is very real. (Like filesystem speed, serial driver bugs, shared data bugs, support experiences, etc.) Aren't you only a bit upset because MicroPort is getting a lot of flag these last few days? Keep 'em coming! Richard (...!mcvax!telmail!neabbs!richard!)