Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!telmail!neabbs!richard
From: richard@neabbs.UUCP (RICHARD RONTELTAP)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3
Message-ID: <17639@neabbs.UUCP>
Date: 11 Aug 88 00:41:44 GMT
Organization: NEABBS multi-line BBS +31-20-717666 (12x), Amsterdam, Holland
Lines: 24

(Sorry, can't quote)
 
[ Comparing XENIX <-> Microport <-> Bell Tech is garbage. ]
 
I don't agree. Im using SCO XENIX (working great) and have had NO
experience with other UNIX flavours.
 
So I'm following the comparisions/flames/metaphores with great
interest. Since UNIXes are (more or less) the same, I would be
perfectly willing to step over to another UNIX, for speed, elegance or
reliability.
 
Of course everyone submits their own subjecttive view, (I really
enjoyed the Farrari <> Cadillac article), but some information is very
real. (Like filesystem speed, serial driver bugs, shared data bugs,
support experiences, etc.)
 
Aren't you only a bit upset because MicroPort is getting a lot of flag
these last few days?
 
Keep 'em coming!
 
Richard
(...!mcvax!telmail!neabbs!richard!)