Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: CMS
Message-ID: <12235@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: 15 Aug 88 22:42:42 GMT
References: <347@spies.UUCP> <670025@hpclscu.HP.COM> <269@quintus.UUCP> <19709@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1988Aug12.061040.18720@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.unix.wizards
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 25

As quoted from <1988Aug12.061040.18720@utzoo.uucp> by henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer):
+---------------
| In article <19709@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> mudd-j@pike.cis.ohio-state.edu (John R. Mudd) writes:
| >>Have you ever used VM/CMS? ...
| >
| >... I *liked* VM/CMS from a user point-of-view.  The shop I worked at had a
| >IBM 3090 running VM/XA with 200+ users, and that system was FAST.  Not like
| >some of the delays I've had on some of these Unix-boxes.  Of course, they're
| >not as big as a 3090...
| 
| Damn right they aren't.  Unix on a big Amdahl really blasts along too.
| Don't confuse hardware with software; of course a really big mainframe
| is faster than an overgrown mini.
+---------------

And, of course, if you stick those 200+ users and VM/CMS on a 4300-series
processor, you start to long for the overgrown minis.  I know from
experience; Cleveland State's mainframe was usually far slower than ncoast,
which is a decidedly *slow* system (386 systems are faster with the same
load).

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, uunet!marque!ncoast!allbery			DELPHI: ALLBERY
	    For comp.sources.misc send mail to ncoast!sources-misc