Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ucsd!rutgers!cmcl2!phri!roy From: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: RCS for System V Message-ID: <3435@phri.UUCP> Date: 14 Aug 88 02:12:19 GMT Article-I.D.: phri.3435 References: <16791@adm.ARPA> <1988Aug12.234138.18684@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> Reply-To: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY) Lines: 16 woods@gpu.utcs.Toronto.EDU (Greg Woods) writes: > I find SCCS is by far the more powerful and capable of the two. Spoken like somebody who has used both of them and is thus in a position to "compare and contrast". Please do -- unsupported "X is better than Y" statements leave the reader cold. Me? I'm a true-blue RCS fan (RCS vs. SCCS has to rank up there with Sys5 vs. BSD and emacs vs. vi for silly religious wars). I find RCS basicly does everything I need to do. On the other hand, if somebody could show me why SCCS is better in concrete terms, I might consider changing my mind. I guess that means I not a True Believer. -- Roy Smith, System Administrator Public Health Research Institute {allegra,philabs,cmcl2,rutgers}!phri!roy -or- phri!roy@uunet.uu.net "The connector is the network"