Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!motsj1!rnv From: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Cut-and-paste (was Re: sharedx and remote conferencing) Message-ID: <567@motsj1.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 88 18:45:13 GMT References: <5411@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <5442@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> Reply-To: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss) Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, San Jose Ca. Lines: 15 R.J.Faichney (rjf@ford.UUCP) writes: > >So I say 'Cut cut buffers out of X -- and the rest'. Who would argue? > Ok, I'll bite. Doesn't making the applications worry about all this complicate them, make them all larger? As for the transformations, I don't care, I think. It's not a performance issue, since the CPU is faster than the hand. I am used to the way the Mac works; it seems intuitive. I don't hear you stating an advantage of getting the cut buffer out of X, I just hear your preference. -- Ron Voss, Senior Systems Engineer, Motorola Microcomputer Division UUCP: {hplabs,mot,oakhill}!motsj1!rnv CIS: 73647,752 Tel: 408-991-7390 Snail: 1150 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Opinions: Mine, not necessarily employer's.