Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!ima!haddock!karl From: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Syntax of function prototypes... Message-ID: <6264@haddock.ima.isc.com> Date: 19 Aug 88 16:09:00 GMT References: <8808171403.AA05181@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <6105@venera.isi.edu> <871@buengc.BU.EDU> Reply-To: karl@haddock.isc.com (Karl Heuer) Organization: Interactive Systems, Boston Lines: 8 In article <871@buengc.BU.EDU> bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton) writes: >Am I missing something or is "int something();" just as good (for a >prototype) (except for [style])? You are missing something. "int something();" is not a prototype; that word is reserved for the new syntax. Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint