Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!motsj1!rnv
From: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Cut-and-paste (was Re: sharedx and remote conferencing)
Message-ID: <567@motsj1.UUCP>
Date: 10 Aug 88 18:45:13 GMT
References: <5411@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <5442@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss)
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, San Jose Ca.
Lines: 15

R.J.Faichney (rjf@ford.UUCP) writes:
>
>So I say 'Cut cut buffers out of X -- and the rest'. Who would argue?
>
Ok, I'll bite.  Doesn't making the applications worry about all this
complicate them, make them all larger?  As for the transformations, I don't
care, I think.  It's not a performance issue, since the CPU is faster
than the hand.  I am used to the way the Mac works; it seems
intuitive.  I don't hear you stating an advantage of getting the
cut buffer out of X, I just hear your preference.
-- 
Ron Voss, Senior Systems Engineer, Motorola Microcomputer Division
UUCP: {hplabs,mot,oakhill}!motsj1!rnv               CIS: 73647,752
Tel: 408-991-7390      Snail: 1150 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Opinions:                        Mine, not necessarily employer's.