Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!husc6!purdue!mailrus!utah-gr!reading
From: reading@utah-gr.UUCP (Dan L. Reading)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore
Subject: Re: Annex hardware flow control
Message-ID: <2794@utah-gr.UUCP>
Date: 19 Aug 88 14:06:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: utah-gr.2794
References: <8808171830.AA05607@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Reply-To: reading@gr.utah.edu.UUCP (Dan L. Reading)
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 8

Yes, I must agree. We need BOTH hardware flow control and modem control.
We have had to throttle our 19.2K modems back to 9600 because of these
"feature".

-- Dan Reading  Systems Programmer CS Dept U of U

P.S. After expressing the above flame I should add that I'm basically
pleased with the Annex boxes.