Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!husc6!purdue!mailrus!utah-gr!reading From: reading@utah-gr.UUCP (Dan L. Reading) Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore Subject: Re: Annex hardware flow control Message-ID: <2794@utah-gr.UUCP> Date: 19 Aug 88 14:06:35 GMT Article-I.D.: utah-gr.2794 References: <8808171830.AA05607@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu> Reply-To: reading@gr.utah.edu.UUCP (Dan L. Reading) Organization: University of Utah CS Dept Lines: 8 Yes, I must agree. We need BOTH hardware flow control and modem control. We have had to throttle our 19.2K modems back to 9600 because of these "feature". -- Dan Reading Systems Programmer CS Dept U of U P.S. After expressing the above flame I should add that I'm basically pleased with the Annex boxes.