Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:1004 comp.sys.amiga:1445 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekfdi!videovax!stever From: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Tractor feed disk labels Summary: Pretty small labels, they are, they are! Message-ID: <4739@videovax.Tek.COM> Date: 15 Dec 87 19:05:47 GMT References: <615@trwspf.TRW.COM> <22155@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.) Organization: Tektronix Television Systems, Beaverton, Oregon Lines: 33 In article <22155@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, Bryce Nesbitt (bryce@hoser.berkeley.edu) writes: > In article <615@trwspf.TRW.COM> knurlin@trwspf.UUCP (Scott Karlin) writes: >> I am looking for 2 3/4" wide x 2" tall tractor feed >> printer labels so I can label my 3-1/2" [90mm] disks. ** >> Does anyone know a good source? > > QuickLabels. 7 * 7mm. Tractor Feed, non-smear, removable, won't fall ^^^^^^^ slightly over 1/4" square. . . > off. Great stuff. > $19 for a pack of 201 labels, or $18 if you buy in multiples of 2 packs. Isn't this a bit high for such small labels? [ 8^) ] > . . . > ** 90mm is the proper size for what some people call "3.5 inch" disks. > The world is metric, catch up, America. One problem with using translations of units people have grown up with is that they often don't have much physical meaning. Bryce undoubtedly meant to write 70 x 70 mm (or 7 x 7 cm). He certainly would have caught the error if he had used English units, instead! Steve Rice ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * JESUS Is The REASON For The SEASON! (Merry Christmas and Happy New Year) * new: stever@videovax.tv.Tek.com old: {decvax | hplabs | ihnp4 | uw-beaver}!tektronix!videovax!stever