Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!killer!ssbn!carpet!bill
From: bill@carpet.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Does anybody know anything about PMX/Term from AT&T?
Message-ID: <116@carpet.WLK.COM>
Date: 12 Jul 88 15:42:00 GMT
References: <740@cgh.UUCP> <1094@nusdhub.UUCP> <5957@chinet.UUCP> <334@tutor.UUCP>
Reply-To: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy)
Followup-To: comp.sys.att
Distribution: na
Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. and Associates
Lines: 13

In article <334@tutor.UUCP> pete@tutor.UUCP (Peter Schmitt) writes:
>In article <5957@chinet.UUCP>, les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
LM At the same meeting where the 3B1 issue was brought up, I asked the
LM AT&T sales people why I should buy their 6386 machine as opposed to
LM the many others on the market.  Their answer: "Well, you want to buy
LM from a company that is going to be around to support it's equipment,
LM don't you?"

PS That's what they said when people were buying 7300's and 6300+'s

And the 6300, 6310, 6312, 3B1, etc. etc. etc.  Everyone catching on?
-- 
Bill Kennedy  Internet:  bill@ssbn.WLK.COM
                Usenet:  { killer | att-cb | ihnp4!tness7 }!ssbn!bill