Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wash08!txr98
From: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: DWB ownership (was: vi vs emacs in a student environment)
Message-ID: <146@wash08.UUCP>
Date: 3 Jul 88 22:17:57 GMT
References: <399@cantuar.UUCP> <11418@steinmetz.ge.com> <6056@megaron.arizona.edu> <144@wash08.UUCP> <8206@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed)
Organization: American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Lines: 15

In article <8206@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) writes:
>In article <144@wash08.UUCP> I write:
>>(however, since INteractive now
>>owns nroff and troff, maybe theirs are the true standards of tomorrow -:)

>And in a posting a few days ago, someone said that SoftQuad's enhanced
>tools were the new official release of DWB.

Many apologies, my misstatement - we're in the midst of
INteractive/SoftQuad wars at my job and I'm getting alittle confused!  -
SoftQuad's formatters are the new, official documenters workbench. 
~
~
~
"Timothy_Reed_American_Chem_Soc" 23 lines, 1152 characters