Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3760 comp.sys.ibm.pc:17137 comp.dcom.lans:1573
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!decwrl!muscat!jfcl.dec.com!tsc.dec.com!tutor!pete
From: pete@tutor.UUCP (Peter Schmitt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: Does anybody know anything about PMX/Term from AT&T?
Summary: sure, sure
Message-ID: <334@tutor.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jul 88 23:38:47 GMT
References: <740@cgh.UUCP> <1094@nusdhub.UUCP> <5957@chinet.UUCP>
Organization: Custom Craft Creations of Colorado Springs
Lines: 8

In article <5957@chinet.UUCP>, les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
> At the same meeting where the 3B1 issue was brought up, I asked the
> AT&T sales people why I should buy their 6386 machine as opposed to
> the many others on the market.  Their answer: "Well, you want to buy
> from a company that is going to be around to support it's equipment,
> don't you?"

That's what they said when people were buying 7300's and 6300+'s