Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!mcdchg!chinet!pdg From: pdg@chinet.UUCP (Paul Guthrie) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: SysV/AT ksh emacs mode broken! Message-ID: <5981@chinet.UUCP> Date: 12 Jul 88 06:10:40 GMT References: <581@splut.UUCP> <367@uport.UUCP> Reply-To: pdg@chinet.UUCP (Paul Guthrie) Organization: The League of Crafty Hackers Lines: 16 In article <367@uport.UUCP> @uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes: >The 286 ksk was compiled without the emacs support. ksh only works if >compiled small model and vi + emacs modes makes ksh too big. >If there is enough call for emacs mode I will do what I can to recompile >it ... > -John Plocher What about the 386 version of ksh? My release (3.0-L2.2) came also with only vi compiled in. There is really no reason for this on a 386, but a subsequent call to uPort found there were no plans to add emacs mode, even when I mentioned it might only be a compile. Or am I out of date and this too is on the uPort BBS? Paul Guthrie I'm Pink ihnp4!chinet!nsacray!paul Therefor I'm Spam. ihnp4!chinet!pdg