Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!panda!genrad!lsrhs!led From: led@lsrhs.UUCP (Jay Jungalwala) Newsgroups: comp.sources.games.bugs Subject: Re: Xconq New version out w/vt100 (etc) use! Keywords: BAD!!!!!!! Message-ID: <812@lsrhs.UUCP> Date: 4 Jul 88 07:37:03 GMT References: <811@lsrhs.UUCP> <17263@gatech.edu> Reply-To: led@lsrhs.UUCP (Jay Jungalwala) Organization: Lincoln Sudbury Regional High School. Sudbury Ma. Lines: 20 In article <17263@gatech.edu> ken@gatech.UUCP (Ken Seefried iii) writes: >I play xconq on the Sun, and have some experience with the VAXStation >version. It is a superior programme, and obviously was a MAJOR undertaking >on the part of the author. First of all, I have played the real version of this game a hundred times over, and I like it. It is very well written, although sometimes core dumps after about 3 houts of play time. I am saying if the guy who wrote the original did such a good job on the "X" version then I expected a little better on the curses version. >then why don't you put youre money where youre mouth is and >fix what you dont like. But then, silly me, you did state that you felt it >was a waste of time. No I ment it is a waste of time because, either I am way to busy, and the fact that I play the X version more then I would play the curses version so it is a waste of time.