Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pacbell!att!chinet!mcdchg!clyde!watmath!watcgl!lily!jrmacmillan
From: jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem!
Message-ID: <5135@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 9 Jul 88 23:15:05 GMT
References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> <1095@luth.luth.se>
Sender: daemon@watcgl.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan)
Organization: Anarchists' Society
Lines: 9

In article <1095@luth.luth.se> Sven-Ove Westberg  writes:
|
|Address parsing is NOT a matter for the UA either.

I beg to differ; how does Elm know who to reply to if it can't parse
addresses?
--
John R. MacMillan
jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu		"I was _roasted_!!"
..!watmath!lily!jrmacmillan			-- M&Ms Peanut