Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!h.cc.purdue.edu!s.cc.purdue.edu!gh3
From: gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu (Gerrit)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: Re: BIND and resolver routines under Dynix 3.0.4
Message-ID: <3382@s.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 14 Jul 88 20:59:42 GMT
References: <143@daitc.ARPA> <2961@cs.utexas.edu> <4080@oxtrap.UUCP> <264@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Gerrit)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 15

In article <264@mace.cc.purdue.edu> rsk@mace.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Rich Kulawiec) writes:
>In article <143@daitc.ARPA> generous@daitc.ARPA (Curtis Generous) writes:
>>Is there a version of Dynix out there that supports the internet domain name 
>>server and the resolver routines? Any info is appreciated.
>
>We have them running under 2.1 and (will soon) under 3.0; but I am all
>but certain that we can't release the sources without violating our license.
>If you have a BSD source license, you'll find that these are not difficult
>to port.  If you don't, I'm not sure how hard it will be.

I just added the support to the Dynix 3.0.8 kernel to support the last bits
of the 1 or 2 ioctl's that Sequent hasn't completed.  They have all the
guts in place, but they haven't yet put in the hooks.  Without kernel
source, there isn't much you can do as yet.

Gerrit Huizenga (gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu)