Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdcrdcf!trwrb!aero!venera.isi.edu!raveling From: raveling@vaxa.isi.edu (Paul Raveling) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: planning for 3rd Annual X Technical Conference Message-ID: <5836@venera.isi.edu> Date: 6 Jul 88 17:11:41 GMT References: <10276@oberon.USC.EDU> <8807011417.AA01033@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU> <913@mmm.UUCP> <10352@oberon.USC.EDU> Sender: news@venera.isi.edu Reply-To: raveling@vaxa.isi.edu (Paul Raveling) Organization: USC-Information Sciences Institute Lines: 19 In article <10352@oberon.USC.EDU> papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes: >In article <913@mmm.UUCP> schultz@mmm.UUCP (John C Schultz) writes: >... >> 3M Center, Bldg 518-1-1, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >I've been there. It's like at MIT last January, except that it is like that >for the WHOLE winter. No wonder you don't care. When looking for other >locations for the X Conf., please disregard Minneapolis or St. Paul :-) I've lived there. ... thought -20 was comfortable enough, so Cambridge isn't bad at all. The local news reports of 50 below 0 wind chill last January must have been someone's fantasy; the lowest actual temp reported was +6. Cambridge is OK, even though it lacks a ski hill. --------------------- Paul Raveling Raveling@vaxa.isi.edu