Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!oberon!sdcrdcf!ism780c!mikep From: mikep@ism780c.isc.com (Michael A. Petonic) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: vi vs emacs in a student environment Message-ID: <11641@ism780c.isc.com> Date: 6 Jul 88 09:20:00 GMT References: <399@cantuar.UUCP> <11418@steinmetz.ge.com> <6056@megaron.arizona.edu> <2844@ttidca.TTI.COM> <1633@hoqax.UUCP> Reply-To: mikep@ism780c.UUCP (Michael A. Petonic) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica CA Lines: 9 In article <1633@hoqax.UUCP> bicker@hoqax.UUCP (The Resource, Poet of Quality) writes: >I learned vi first (well actually, I learned TECO first, but that's >another story) and then learned emacs. I prefer emacs. I wonder >how many people would be able to say the opposite. Hear hear. I learned VI before Emacs and used it for about 3 years before I evolved to GNU. 'Nuff said. -MikeP