Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!gatech!bloom-beacon!backup!drl
From: drl@backup (David R. Linn)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest
Subject: LISP implementations
Message-ID: <19880712043505.7.NICK@HOWARD-JOHNSONS.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Date: 12 Jul 88 04:35:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19
Approved: ailist@ai.ai.mit.edu

Date: Fri, 8 Jul 88 22:19 EDT
From: David R. Linn 
To: ailist@ai.ai.mit.edu
Subject: LISP implementations

Does anyone have any experience with a LISP implementation that does
not rely on an interpreter? I know of none such but before I state (in
my master's thesis) or even imply that LISP is *always* implemented with
an interpreter, I thought I'd solicit confirmation (or counterexample)
from the readers of AILIST(/comp.ai?). Please reply directly to me as this
is not likely to be of interest to most of the readership; "if there is
evidence of sufficient interest, I will summarize to the list/newsgroup."

NB: my mailer is broken; reply to the address below - not to the address
in the header. (The postmaster is busy working on his master's thesis.)

David Linn - System Manager/Postmaster
Vanderbilt University School of Engineering
drl@vuse.vanderbilt.edu -or- ...!uunet!vuse!drl