Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu!vkr From: vkr@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu (Vidhyanath K. Rao) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: 2090 HDdisk.device Message-ID: <651@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> Date: 4 Jul 88 20:12:03 GMT References: <1196.AA1196@heimat> Organization: Ohio State Math-Stats Dept Lines: 20 In article <1196.AA1196@heimat>, sneakers@heimat.UUCP (Dan "Sneakers" Schein) writes: >[...] it is also highly likley that 1 person in each user group has access to > one of the other commercial database services. This whole thread started because somebody was trying to get hold of a device driver but didn't know where to look. It may be in comp.*.amiga but I don't know. > It seems to me that you may have forgot that CBM is on BIX to support the > Amiga Developer. Any support they give on UseNet, other commercial > database(s), or a BBS is purely above and beyond the call of duty! The whole discussion is about the support the non-developer gets. The parallel threads about dealer quality etc refelct this. I would like to (but not going to now: I will be away for several weeks.) survey the net as to how many are 'semi-sophisticated' users: cabable of doing minor fix-ups, but lack the time and the will to be a developer. The goodwill of these is essential if Amiga is to penetrate the educational market. I personally prefer the Amiga envoirment for TeX, Maple, TrueBasic etc. But as things stand, I have qulams about recommending Amiga for the university. The question is does anybody care if this is to change. I am sick of this discussion and personally don't care anymore. At least as long as my software collection stands still while I write-off my Amiga.