Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!oberon!sdcrdcf!ism780c!mikep
From: mikep@ism780c.isc.com (Michael A. Petonic)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: vi vs emacs in a student environment
Message-ID: <11641@ism780c.isc.com>
Date: 6 Jul 88 09:20:00 GMT
References: <399@cantuar.UUCP> <11418@steinmetz.ge.com> <6056@megaron.arizona.edu> <2844@ttidca.TTI.COM> <1633@hoqax.UUCP>
Reply-To: mikep@ism780c.UUCP (Michael A. Petonic)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica CA
Lines: 9

In article <1633@hoqax.UUCP> bicker@hoqax.UUCP (The Resource, Poet of Quality) writes:
 >I learned vi first (well actually, I learned TECO first, but that's
 >another story) and then learned emacs.  I prefer emacs.  I wonder
 >how many people would be able to say the opposite.  

Hear hear.  I learned VI before Emacs and used it for about 3 years
before I evolved to GNU.  'Nuff said.

-MikeP