Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdcrdcf!trwrb!aero!venera.isi.edu!raveling
From: raveling@vaxa.isi.edu (Paul Raveling)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: planning for 3rd Annual X Technical Conference
Message-ID: <5836@venera.isi.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 88 17:11:41 GMT
References: <10276@oberon.USC.EDU> <8807011417.AA01033@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU> <913@mmm.UUCP> <10352@oberon.USC.EDU>
Sender: news@venera.isi.edu
Reply-To: raveling@vaxa.isi.edu (Paul Raveling)
Organization: USC-Information Sciences Institute
Lines: 19

In article <10352@oberon.USC.EDU> papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
>In article <913@mmm.UUCP> schultz@mmm.UUCP (John C Schultz) writes:
>...
>>           3M Center, Bldg 518-1-1, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
>                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>I've been there. It's like at MIT last January, except that it is like that
>for the WHOLE winter.  No wonder you don't care. When looking for other 
>locations for the X Conf., please disregard Minneapolis or St. Paul :-)

	I've lived there.  ... thought -20 was comfortable enough, so
	Cambridge isn't bad at all.  The local news reports of 50 below 0
	wind chill last January must have been someone's fantasy;
	the lowest actual temp reported was +6.

	Cambridge is OK, even though it lacks a ski hill.


---------------------
Paul Raveling
Raveling@vaxa.isi.edu