Xref: utzoo news.groups:4808 news.admin:2935 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!skyler From: skyler@violet.berkeley.edu Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin Subject: Re: comp.women Message-ID: <11619@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 3 Jul 88 21:03:19 GMT References: <2151@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 18 In article <2151@pt.cs.cmu.edu> netnews@pt.cs.cmu.edu (USENET News Group Software) writes: >Will somebody PLEASE let us know whether or not comp.women is supposed to >exists or not? We've received a few rmgrps messages, but it isn't clear >from discussion on news.groups whether or not these instructions should >be followed. And given the heat of the discussion, I am certainly not >going to remove the group just because we received such messages. Go ahead and remove comp.women. I was the one who proposed it and I am the one who was supposed to moderate it. Instead, comp.society.women is the compromise. That second group does exist (although it has an incredibly low propagation--I'm not sure why) is moderated and has postings. If you are not getting comp.society.women, please let me know and I will mail it to you. Thanks, Trish Roberts (skyler@violet.berkeley.edu)