Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!killer!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!nic!umn-cs!bungia!datapg!sewilco
From: sewilco@datapg.MN.ORG (Scot E. Wilcoxon)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Whatever happened to "Elm - the MAILER" ??
Message-ID: <1157@datapg.MN.ORG>
Date: 9 Jul 88 19:43:31 GMT
References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> <1060@datapg.DataPg.MN.ORG> <520@a <23@n0atp.UUCP> <10305@ncc.Nexus.CA> <560@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <5958@chinet.UUCP>
Reply-To: sewilco@datapg.MN.ORG (Scot E. Wilcoxon)
Followup-To: comp.mail.elm
Organization: Data Progress, Minneapolis, MN
Lines: 18

In article <5958@chinet.UUCP> les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
 edc@altnet.UUCP (Eric Christensen) writes:
<>..
<>Now, the question is how do we deal with the optional encryption? I think that
<>..
..