Xref: utzoo news.admin:2958 news.sysadmin:791 comp.sources.wanted:4478 comp.sources.d:2401 comp.unix.xenix:2608
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!vector!rpp386!pigs!haugj
From: haugj@pigs.UUCP (Joe Bob Willie)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.sysadmin,comp.sources.wanted,comp.sources.d,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Please remove PD-YACC sources from your machine IMMEDIATELY
Summary: Sending sources to AT&T for their inspection.
Message-ID: <235@pigs.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jul 88 19:31:21 GMT
References: <3532@rpp386.UUCP> <135@dcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: haugj@pigs.UUCP (Joe Bob Willie)
Organization: Chuck Jr. Fan Club
Lines: 38
Name: Chairman of the Bored

In article <135@dcs.UUCP> wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) writes:
>1. Are they reacting to the _name_ YACC, or did they look at the actual
>   files John had on his system and determine that they consisted of
>   or contained AT&T-owned source?

i don't know.  otis wilson is out of town, and i suspect only he knows.
i doubt they picked the code up from me, more likely they are aware the
posting shouldn't have been made from previous inquiries.  of course, i
may be wrong.  for everyone's information, the source was obtained from
killer's comp.unix.sources archive as i recall.  you might want to check
your machine if you archive comp.unix.sources.

>2. If they are reacting to the name YACC, does this mean that they ARE
>   moving towards considering the names of *NIX utilities their property
>   which no-one else may use? If so, where does this leave such products
>   as MINIX, MKS, etc.?

no, they seem to be aiming at the source itself, or possibly the ideas
contained in the source.  i'm not certain.  i don't know how this will
affect unix-like utilities.  it may affect clones which are not exact
source ripoffs, but say, used the exact same algorithms.  for example,
a yacc clone which built a lalr(0) parser identical to the real yacc
might be more in danger than one which built a lr(0) or lr(1) parser.

>It might be useful if Mr. Wilson of AT&T could address these two questions;
>he or his colleagues obviously read news or they would not have known about
>John's posting.

in speaking with someone at at&t software licensing i learned that they
do not have netnews access.  so, mr. wilson will not be reading about
this on the net.

- john.
-- 
 Joe Bob Willie                                             Big "D" Oil and Gas
 UUCP: ...!killer!rpp386!jfh                            jfh@rpp386.uucp :DOMAIN
 **** Trivia question of the day: VYARZERZIMANIMORORSEZASSEZANSERAREORSES? ****
 "You are in a twisty little maze of UUCP connections, all alike" -- fortune