Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!mcdchg!chinet!pdg
From: pdg@chinet.UUCP (Paul Guthrie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: SysV/AT ksh emacs mode broken!
Message-ID: <5981@chinet.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jul 88 06:10:40 GMT
References: <581@splut.UUCP> <367@uport.UUCP>
Reply-To: pdg@chinet.UUCP (Paul Guthrie)
Organization: The League of Crafty Hackers
Lines: 16

In article <367@uport.UUCP> @uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes:
>The 286 ksk was compiled without the emacs support.  ksh only works if
>compiled small model and vi + emacs modes makes ksh too big.
>If there is enough call for emacs mode I will do what I can to recompile
>it ...
>  -John Plocher
What about the 386 version of ksh?  My release (3.0-L2.2) came also
with only vi compiled in.  There is really no reason for this on
a 386, but a subsequent call to uPort found there were no plans to
add emacs mode, even when I mentioned it might only be a compile.

Or am I out of date and this too is on the uPort BBS?

Paul Guthrie					I'm Pink
ihnp4!chinet!nsacray!paul			Therefor I'm Spam.
ihnp4!chinet!pdg