Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ihlpa!ihnp4!cbmvax!andy
From: andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Jos Vermaseren - Posting GEMDOS ... (illegality)
Message-ID: <4186@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jul 88 20:20:46 GMT
References: <8806211323.AA02010@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <343@forty2.UUCP> <4640@killer.UUCP>
Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 17

In article <4640@killer.UUCP> chasm@killer.UUCP (Charles Marslett) writes:
>-- a reasonable extrapolation is that it would also be legal to sell a copy of
>the disassembly to someone who wanted to use the disassembled software -- though
>I'm not sure about how reasonable a bunch of lawyers would be!  [I am refering

How different is this from someone making a copy of a commercial program,
then selling the copy ?

-- 
andy finkel		{uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy
Commodore-Amiga, Inc.

"Un*x is the answer, but only if you phrase the question very
carefully.
				
Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.