Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ihlpa!ihnp4!cbmvax!andy From: andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Jos Vermaseren - Posting GEMDOS ... (illegality) Message-ID: <4186@cbmvax.UUCP> Date: 5 Jul 88 20:20:46 GMT References: <8806211323.AA02010@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <343@forty2.UUCP> <4640@killer.UUCP> Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.UUCP (Andy Finkel) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 17 In article <4640@killer.UUCP> chasm@killer.UUCP (Charles Marslett) writes: >-- a reasonable extrapolation is that it would also be legal to sell a copy of >the disassembly to someone who wanted to use the disassembled software -- though >I'm not sure about how reasonable a bunch of lawyers would be! [I am refering How different is this from someone making a copy of a commercial program, then selling the copy ? -- andy finkel {uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy Commodore-Amiga, Inc. "Un*x is the answer, but only if you phrase the question very carefully. Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share. I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.