Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mandrill!gatech!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!hedrick From: hedrick@aramis.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: SysV/AT ksh emacs mode broken! Message-ID:Date: 9 Jul 88 08:30:20 GMT References: <581@splut.UUCP> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 8 On the 286, there is not enough address space to include both emacs and vi line editing modes. (The makefile is set up for small model. I haven't had the courage to try large model.) The binary on the uport bbs is compiled with vi. That's why emacs mode didn't work for you. vi is bigger than emacs, so if you compile ksh with emacs instead of vi, you also have room for the Berkeley-style job-control stuff. (If you use the patches I have developed, job control will even work.)