Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!rutgers!njin!princeton!njsmu!klg From: klg@njsmu.UUCP (Kenneth Goodwin) Newsgroups: comp.terminals Subject: Re: Looking for a full-featured terminal Summary: TVI955 correction Message-ID: <455@njsmu.UUCP> Date: 6 Jul 88 17:53:18 GMT References: <758@lakesys.UUCP> <3249@encore.UUCP> <3241@palo-alto.DEC.COM> Organization: NJ State Medical Underwriters, Lawrenceville Lines: 24 In article <3241@palo-alto.DEC.COM>, vixie@palo-alto.DEC.COM (Paul Vixie) writes: > In article <3249@encore.UUCP> loverso@encore.UUCP (John Robert LoVerso) writes: > # The newer Televideos are also nice, but the lastest models I've seen > # (905, 955) still inflict the user with magic cookie characters for > # screen attributes. I can't believe that they add all that ugliness > # just to save a few $$ on static rams. I won't ever buy (another) > # Televideo as long as they use magic cookies. > We have over 30 TVI 955 terminals, they have a SETUP feature that allows you to use OR NOT use magic cookie mode. That is, screen attributes can be stored in onscreen ram or parallel offscreen ram, so you can have it any way you want. We have had them for over two years and are reasonably happy with them We have had Hazeltine 1500 series, Esprit series , perkin elmer terminals and of all of them, the TVI 955 are by far the best. The only complaint has been a few baby dead terminals, plus ROM BUGS. We may persue obtaining updated versions of the ROMS when we buy our next set of TVI 955's. We are also considering purchasing Visual Technology 630 and 640 X system model terminals, any comments on these? Ken Goodwin NJ State Medical Underwriters, Inc.