Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!kay From: kay@warwick.UUCP (Kay Dekker) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: vi documentation Message-ID: <741@ubu.warwick.UUCP> Date: 15 Jul 88 19:38:20 GMT References: <16364@brl-adm.ARPA> <178@skep2.ATT.COM> Sender: news@warwick.UUCP Reply-To: kay@warwick.UUCP (Kay Dekker) Organization: Computer Science, Warwick University, UK Lines: 18 In article <178@skep2.ATT.COM> wcs@skep2.UUCP (46323-Bill.Stewart.[ho95c],2G218,x0705,) writes: >In article <16364@brl-adm.ARPA> rbj@cmr.icst.nbs.gov (Root Boy Jim) writes: >:? tomf@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Tom Fredericks) writes: >:? > I could also use some vi docs. If anyone knows of a book or has >:? > some 'complete' docs in a file I would really appreciate it. >:You must be running TPC UNIX or you wouldn't have to ask. > [Look, Root Boy, we ain't TFPC any more!] >Mr. Cottrell is suggesting that Berkeley UNIX comes with good vi >documentation (which it does), and that System V doesn't (which it >doesn't.) And why not? Oh - I see - additional documentation - additional money - after all, who uses screen editors? :-( disgustedly, Kay "I AM; YOU ARE; HELLO: all else is poetry" ... mcvax!ukc!warwick!kay