Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!cvaxa!aledm From: aledm@cvaxa.sussex.ac.uk (Aled Morris) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: client-only X11 build Summary: not many changes needed Message-ID: <497@cvaxa.sussex.ac.uk> Date: 13 Jul 88 14:43:01 GMT References: <8806291555.AA06775@bu-cs.bu.edu> Organization: School of Cognitive Sciences, Univ of Sussex, Brighton, UK Lines: 24 In article <8806291555.AA06775@bu-cs.bu.edu>, bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) writes: > Has anyone given any thought to how the makefiles should operate for a > client-only build? Seems one has to do some direct surgery to elide > the SERVERSRC and FONTSRC directories, And you only need to do that because the code in the makefile says something like "for foo in ; do ... done". Personally, I think this is a bug in the Bourne shell (does anyone out there know what KSH does with empty lists in "for" statements?) > Also, I assume there's no point in -DUNIXCONN for a client-only build Right. I posted details of a client-only build for the Sequent Symmetry, including diffs, to "comp.sys.sequent" (should I have cross posted to xpert?) Aled Morris systems programmer mail: aledm@cvaxa.sussex.ac.uk | School of Cognitive Science uucp: ..!mcvax!ukc!cvaxa!aledm | University of Sussex talk: +44-(0)273-606755 x4284 | Falmer, Brighton, England "I'm living in the future/I feel wonderful/I'm tipping over backwards... I'm so ambitious/I'm looking back/I'm running a race and you're the book I read"