Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mandrill!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Why DEC doesn't need an ABI Message-ID: <8221@ncoast.UUCP> Date: 5 Jul 88 17:53:12 GMT References: <8185@ncoast.UUCP> <686@spectrix.UUCP> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: comp.unix.wizards Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 18 As quoted from <686@spectrix.UUCP> by clewis@spectrix.UUCP (Chris Lewis (It's loose again!)): +--------------- | In article <8185@ncoast.UUCP> allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) writes: | |that (a) DEC does not license the VAX processor for anyone else's use, and | |(b) DEC sells the only true commercial VAX UNIX. | | And I agree that most of the other versions of UNIX you mention aren't | "commercial". But, what about HCR's SVR3 for VAXen? They've been shipping | for several months now (I think). That I would consider "commercial"... +--------------- I hadn't heard of that, and hereby withdraw my argument. Thanks for the update. ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery, uunet!marque!ncoast!allbery DELPHI: ALLBERY For comp.sources.misc send mail to ncoast!sources-misc