Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ccicpg!turnkey!stanton!donegan
From: donegan@stanton.TCC.COM (Steven P. Donegan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: tgetent core dump on sco xenix
Summary: My Development System Works Fine (SCO 2.2.1)
Message-ID: <71@stanton.TCC.COM>
Date: 10 Jul 88 14:07:34 GMT
References: <3291@bigtex.uucp> <517@cimcor.UUCP>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Stanton Public Domain Systems, Stanton, Ca.
Lines: 29

In article <517@cimcor.UUCP>, mike@cimcor.UUCP (Michael Grenier) writes:
> : int *i, **p;
> :
> : i = 0;
> : if (i != 0)
> :   printf("Broken compiler\n");
> :
> : p = &i /* ie, not 0 */
          ^
          syntax error - needs ';'

> : if (p == 0)
> :   printf("Broken compiler\n");
> :
> : surely it can handle the "integer constant 0" business (and if it
> : doesn't handle either, you don't want it).  I can't remember if uPort
> : did this right with their 286 unix, but I expect better of SCO.
> 
> 
> uPort has no problem with this.
> 
>     -Mike Grenier
>      mike@cimcor.mn.org

With the exception of the syntax error above, SCO 2.2.1 handled this program
fragment properly on my system. What exactly are you all trying to say about
the compiler being broken? What version of SCO's development system was under
discussion - my news feed has been down for about 8-10 days and I'm not at all
sure what point is trying to be made here. Thanks for any feedback...