Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!cornell!rochester!ur-tut!akk2 From: akk2@ur-tut (Atul Kacker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Editors Keywords: Small, good, fast Message-ID: <2287@ur-tut.UUCP> Date: 15 Jul 88 18:13:41 GMT References:Reply-To: akk2@tut.cc.rochester.edu.UUCP (Atul Kacker) Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center Lines: 18 In article porter@topaz.rutgers.edu (Adam L. Porter) writes: > >What is the consensus out there for the best all-around text editor? >I use the Norton Editor, which is very good. >Does anyone have a vote for their favorite fastest, smallest, or >full-featured editor? (By small, I mean RAM, not disk space.) >-- Please, not again !! This 'My editor is better/faster/bigger than yours' discussion comes up every few months and is nothing but a waste of net resources. If you want to compare features, just dig up review articles in PC mags. Dr. Dobbs had one some time back. -- Atul Kacker | Internet: akk2@tut.cc.rochester.edu | UUCP: {ames,cmcl2,decvax,rutgers}!rochester!ur-tut!akk2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------