Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!gatech!dcatla!dxjsb From: dxjsb@dcatla.UUCP (Jack S. Brindle) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: MAC 88000, or why not a Intel 386-based MAC Message-ID: <6751@dcatla.UUCP> Date: 15 Jul 88 14:21:12 GMT References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <925@garth.UUCP> <153@pitstop.UUCP> <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> Reply-To: dxjsb@sunb.UUCP (Jack S. Brindle) Organization: DCA Inc., Alpharetta, GA Lines: 10 jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle) writes: > Why not a Mac based on the 386 family? There's a 386-based Sun, after > all. Byte order would be a problem, but it can be overcome. And the 386 Every try running 68XXX binaries on a Sun (or any other) 386 machine? I hope Apple stays with the current brain-smart architecture! Jack Brindle Hmmm... Wonder if John really was making a BIG joke???