Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!panda!genrad!lsrhs!led
From: led@lsrhs.UUCP (Jay Jungalwala)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.games.bugs
Subject: Re: Xconq New version out w/vt100 (etc) use!
Keywords: BAD!!!!!!!
Message-ID: <812@lsrhs.UUCP>
Date: 4 Jul 88 07:37:03 GMT
References: <811@lsrhs.UUCP> <17263@gatech.edu>
Reply-To: led@lsrhs.UUCP (Jay Jungalwala)
Organization: Lincoln Sudbury Regional High School. Sudbury Ma.
Lines: 20

In article <17263@gatech.edu> ken@gatech.UUCP (Ken Seefried iii) writes:

>I play xconq on the Sun, and have some experience with the VAXStation
>version.  It is a superior programme, and obviously was a MAJOR undertaking 
>on the part of the author.  

	First of all, I have played the real version of this game a hundred
times over, and I like it.  It is very well written, although sometimes core
dumps after about 3 houts of play time.  I am saying if the guy who wrote
the original did such a good job on the "X" version then I expected a little
better on the curses version.


>then why don't you put youre money where youre mouth is and 
>fix what you dont like.  But then, silly me, you did state that you felt it
>was a waste of time.  

	No I ment it is a waste of time because, either I am way to busy,
and the fact that I play the X version more then I would play the curses
version so it is a waste of time.