Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!pacbell!att!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 From: nevin1@ihlpf.ATT.COM (00704a-Liber) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Should I convert FORTRAN code to C? Message-ID: <5235@ihlpf.ATT.COM> Date: 8 Jul 88 00:33:12 GMT References: <2742@utastro.UUCP> <20008@beta.UUCP> <224@raunvis.UUCP> <1189@mcgill-vision.UUCP> <20454@beta.lanl.gov> <829@garth.UUCP> <8184@brl-smoke.ARPA> <836@garth.UUCP> Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpf.UUCP (00704a-Liber,N.J.) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 12 In article <836@garth.UUCP> smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) writes: |Operators are conceptually distinct from function calls, both from the |programmers point of view, in how formulas are written, and from the |point of view of the compiler, in how the symbols and their operands are |identified. Operators are NOT conceptually different from functions! Conceptually, operators are just a notational convienence for functions, period. -- _ __ NEVIN J. LIBER ..!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 (312) 510-6194 ' ) ) You are in a little twisting maze of / / _ , __o ____ email paths, all different. / (_