Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!pacbell!att!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1
From: nevin1@ihlpf.ATT.COM (00704a-Liber)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Should I convert FORTRAN code to C?
Message-ID: <5235@ihlpf.ATT.COM>
Date: 8 Jul 88 00:33:12 GMT
References: <2742@utastro.UUCP> <20008@beta.UUCP> <224@raunvis.UUCP> <1189@mcgill-vision.UUCP> <20454@beta.lanl.gov> <829@garth.UUCP> <8184@brl-smoke.ARPA> <836@garth.UUCP>
Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpf.UUCP (00704a-Liber,N.J.)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 12

In article <836@garth.UUCP> smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) writes:
|Operators are conceptually distinct from function calls, both from the
|programmers point of view, in how formulas are written, and from the
|point of view of the compiler, in how the symbols and their operands are
|identified.

Operators are NOT conceptually different from functions!  Conceptually,
operators are just a notational convienence for functions, period.
-- 
 _ __			NEVIN J. LIBER	..!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1	(312) 510-6194
' )  )				You are in a little twisting maze of
 /  / _ , __o  ____		 email paths, all different.
/  (_