Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!luth!eru.mt.luth.se!sow
From: sow@eru.mt.luth.se (Sven-Ove Westberg)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem!
Message-ID: <1095@luth.luth.se>
Date: 6 Jul 88 12:10:48 GMT
References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA>
Sender: news@sm.luth.se
Reply-To: Sven-Ove Westberg 
Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines: 20
UUCP-Path: {uunet,mcvax}!enea!cad.luth.se!sow

In article <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> lyndon@ncc.nexus.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes:
|In article <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> edc@altnet.ALTOS.COM (Eric Christensen) writes:

|As far as I am concerned, if two people want to send each other encrypted
|mail they should implement their own compatable (with each others)
|crypt(1) replacement. I don't think encryption should be part of the UA.
|Let's use the man hours to develop some bullet proof parsing for return
|addresses. We can always add the bells later.

Address parsing is NOT a matter for the UA either.

|-- 
|{alberta,pyramid,uunet}!ncc!lyndon  lyndon@Nexus.CA


Sven-Ove Westberg, CAD, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden.
UUCP:    {uunet,mcvax}!enea!cad.luth.se!sow
ARPA:    sow%cad.luth.se@ucbvax.berkeley.edu  (only dumb ARPA mailers)
Internet: sow@cad.luth.se
Bitnet:  sow%cad.luth.se@sekth