Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!endor!singer From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LSP version ?? Message-ID: <4939@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 13 Jul 88 20:28:35 GMT References: <6173@megaron.arizona.edu> <17000116@clio> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA Lines: 14 In article <17000116@clio> brewer@clio.las.uiuc.edu writes: >Apparently THINK likes LSC'ers more than they like >LSP'ers :-( > (Grits teeth. Says to self, "I will not swear on the net, I will not swear on the net!") Bull, uh, crap. There's no favoritism towards users of either product, it's just that tLightspeedC 3.0 got started in development first, that's all. Rich Siegel Symantec/THINK Technologies