Path: utzoo!yunexus!oz
From: oz@yunexus.UUCP (Ozan Yigit)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Please remove PD-YACC sources ... [history repeats..]
Keywords: yacc, non-pd, enouuuuuggggghhhh!!!
Message-ID: <540@yunexus.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jul 88 03:12:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: yunexus.540
References: <3532@rpp386.UUCP> <880001@vx2.GBA.NYU.EDU>
Reply-To: oz@yunexus.UUCP (Ozan Yigit)
Organization: York U. Computing Services - Magic Group
Lines: 27

In article <880001@vx2.GBA.NYU.EDU David HM Spector writes:
>
>Now, wait a second!!!   Don't be so quick to jump to ATT's call... I haven't 

	No, please don't wait. :-)

>seen the posting (wish I had..) but just because something is called YACC 
>doesn't mean that its automatically owned by ATT.  If these sources had 
>copyright notices all of them it was pretty silly to post them, but if not 
>its not against the law (yet) to write a YACC replacement.

Egad... The so-called PD YACC, which is in fact THE Yacc broken-apart
to little pieces, has been posted, and WITHDRAWN half-a-dozen times
to this net over the years. 

IT IS NOT PD. Withdraw/remove sources, or accept consequences. When
will this ever stop ?? Get BISON if you want a YACC-IN-SOURCE. Can't
anyone tell AT&T means business ?? Even the infamous Austin Code Works
finally dropped it off its source-code distribution, most probably
due to a similar letter.

oz
-- 
Crud that is not paged	        | Usenet: ...!utzoo!yunexus!oz
is still crud. 			| ....!uunet!mnetor!yunexus!oz
	andrew@alice		| Bitnet: oz@[yulibra|yuyetti]
				| Phonet: +1 416 736-5257x3976