Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!cornell!rochester!ur-tut!akk2
From: akk2@ur-tut (Atul Kacker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Editors
Keywords: Small, good, fast
Message-ID: <2287@ur-tut.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jul 88 18:13:41 GMT
References: 
Reply-To: akk2@tut.cc.rochester.edu.UUCP (Atul Kacker)
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
Lines: 18

In article  porter@topaz.rutgers.edu (Adam L. Porter) writes:
>
>What is the consensus out there for the best all-around text editor?
>I use the Norton Editor, which is very good.
>Does anyone have a vote for their favorite fastest, smallest, or
>full-featured editor?  (By small, I mean RAM, not disk space.)
>-- 


Please, not again !!  This 'My editor is better/faster/bigger than yours'
discussion comes up every few months and is nothing but a waste of net
resources.  If you want to compare features, just dig up review articles in
PC mags.  Dr. Dobbs had one some time back.


-- 
Atul Kacker  |     Internet: akk2@tut.cc.rochester.edu
             |     UUCP: {ames,cmcl2,decvax,rutgers}!rochester!ur-tut!akk2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------