Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!h.cc.purdue.edu!s.cc.purdue.edu!gh3 From: gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu (Gerrit) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent Subject: Re: BIND and resolver routines under Dynix 3.0.4 Message-ID: <3382@s.cc.purdue.edu> Date: 14 Jul 88 20:59:42 GMT References: <143@daitc.ARPA> <2961@cs.utexas.edu> <4080@oxtrap.UUCP> <264@mace.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Gerrit) Organization: Purdue University Lines: 15 In article <264@mace.cc.purdue.edu> rsk@mace.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Rich Kulawiec) writes: >In article <143@daitc.ARPA> generous@daitc.ARPA (Curtis Generous) writes: >>Is there a version of Dynix out there that supports the internet domain name >>server and the resolver routines? Any info is appreciated. > >We have them running under 2.1 and (will soon) under 3.0; but I am all >but certain that we can't release the sources without violating our license. >If you have a BSD source license, you'll find that these are not difficult >to port. If you don't, I'm not sure how hard it will be. I just added the support to the Dynix 3.0.8 kernel to support the last bits of the 1 or 2 ioctl's that Sequent hasn't completed. They have all the guts in place, but they haven't yet put in the hooks. Without kernel source, there isn't much you can do as yet. Gerrit Huizenga (gh3@s.cc.purdue.edu)