Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!BLIULG11.BITNET!A-PIRARD
From: A-PIRARD@BLIULG11.BITNET (Andre PIRARD)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Glossaries
Message-ID: <8807121636.AA12801@jade.berkeley.edu>
Date: 12 Jul 88 11:00:35 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11

I have always been amazed by glossaries being sorted alphabetically.
This makes them a real pain to read. Isn't the place of LOOP just after DO,
or even better, both described simultaneously with multiple headers.
That way, a glossary is much more educational with everything in context.
And alphabet is the realm of an index, isn't it?
Now, the argument that some words don't easily fall in a category does not
hold. More than 90% do and cross referencing will make for the rest.

How would you have liked the words of this note sorted?

Andr .