Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!kay
From: kay@warwick.UUCP (Kay Dekker)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: vi documentation
Message-ID: <741@ubu.warwick.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jul 88 19:38:20 GMT
References: <16364@brl-adm.ARPA> <178@skep2.ATT.COM>
Sender: news@warwick.UUCP
Reply-To: kay@warwick.UUCP (Kay Dekker)
Organization: Computer Science, Warwick University, UK
Lines: 18

In article <178@skep2.ATT.COM> wcs@skep2.UUCP (46323-Bill.Stewart.[ho95c],2G218,x0705,) writes:
>In article <16364@brl-adm.ARPA> rbj@cmr.icst.nbs.gov (Root Boy Jim) writes:
>:? tomf@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Tom Fredericks) writes:
>:? >   I could also use some vi docs.  If anyone knows of a book or has 
>:? >   some 'complete' docs in a file I would really appreciate it.
>:You must be running TPC UNIX or you wouldn't have to ask.
>	[Look, Root Boy, we ain't TFPC any more!]
>Mr. Cottrell is suggesting that Berkeley UNIX comes with good vi
>documentation (which it does), and that System V doesn't (which it
>doesn't.)

And why not? Oh - I see - additional documentation - additional money -
after all, who uses screen editors? :-(

					 disgustedly,
						Kay
"I AM; YOU ARE; HELLO: all else is poetry"
			... mcvax!ukc!warwick!kay