Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!killer!ssbn!carpet!bill From: bill@carpet.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att Subject: Re: Does anybody know anything about PMX/Term from AT&T? Message-ID: <116@carpet.WLK.COM> Date: 12 Jul 88 15:42:00 GMT References: <740@cgh.UUCP> <1094@nusdhub.UUCP> <5957@chinet.UUCP> <334@tutor.UUCP> Reply-To: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Followup-To: comp.sys.att Distribution: na Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. and Associates Lines: 13 In article <334@tutor.UUCP> pete@tutor.UUCP (Peter Schmitt) writes: >In article <5957@chinet.UUCP>, les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) writes: LM At the same meeting where the 3B1 issue was brought up, I asked the LM AT&T sales people why I should buy their 6386 machine as opposed to LM the many others on the market. Their answer: "Well, you want to buy LM from a company that is going to be around to support it's equipment, LM don't you?" PS That's what they said when people were buying 7300's and 6300+'s And the 6300, 6310, 6312, 3B1, etc. etc. etc. Everyone catching on? -- Bill Kennedy Internet: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM Usenet: { killer | att-cb | ihnp4!tness7 }!ssbn!bill