Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wash08!txr98 From: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: DWB ownership (was: vi vs emacs in a student environment) Message-ID: <146@wash08.UUCP> Date: 3 Jul 88 22:17:57 GMT References: <399@cantuar.UUCP> <11418@steinmetz.ge.com> <6056@megaron.arizona.edu> <144@wash08.UUCP> <8206@brl-smoke.ARPA> Reply-To: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) Organization: American Chemical Society, Washington, DC Lines: 15 In article <8206@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) writes: >In article <144@wash08.UUCP> I write: >>(however, since INteractive now >>owns nroff and troff, maybe theirs are the true standards of tomorrow -:) >And in a posting a few days ago, someone said that SoftQuad's enhanced >tools were the new official release of DWB. Many apologies, my misstatement - we're in the midst of INteractive/SoftQuad wars at my job and I'm getting alittle confused! - SoftQuad's formatters are the new, official documenters workbench. ~ ~ ~ "Timothy_Reed_American_Chem_Soc" 23 lines, 1152 characters