Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!luth!eru.mt.luth.se!sow From: sow@eru.mt.luth.se (Sven-Ove Westberg) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem! Message-ID: <1095@luth.luth.se> Date: 6 Jul 88 12:10:48 GMT References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> Sender: news@sm.luth.se Reply-To: Sven-Ove WestbergOrganization: University of Lulea, Sweden Lines: 20 UUCP-Path: {uunet,mcvax}!enea!cad.luth.se!sow In article <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> lyndon@ncc.nexus.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes: |In article <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> edc@altnet.ALTOS.COM (Eric Christensen) writes: |As far as I am concerned, if two people want to send each other encrypted |mail they should implement their own compatable (with each others) |crypt(1) replacement. I don't think encryption should be part of the UA. |Let's use the man hours to develop some bullet proof parsing for return |addresses. We can always add the bells later. Address parsing is NOT a matter for the UA either. |-- |{alberta,pyramid,uunet}!ncc!lyndon lyndon@Nexus.CA Sven-Ove Westberg, CAD, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden. UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!enea!cad.luth.se!sow ARPA: sow%cad.luth.se@ucbvax.berkeley.edu (only dumb ARPA mailers) Internet: sow@cad.luth.se Bitnet: sow%cad.luth.se@sekth