Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3600 comp.unix.questions:7767 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!dcs!wnp From: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools) Message-ID: <127@dcs.UUCP> Date: 25 Jun 88 14:41:40 GMT References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <308@marob.MASA.COM> <1383@lznv.ATT.COM> <142@wash08.UUCP> <8152@brl-smoke.ARPA> Reply-To: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul) Organization: DCS, Dallas, Texas Lines: 15 In article <8152@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) writes: >In article <142@wash08.UUCP> txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) writes: >>If MKS didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval? > >Of course not. And I bet that there were (are) a lot of AT&T employees using CSS' PC-VI and possibly PC-TOOLS and SPELL. One even told me that he had purchased his copy of PC-VI from the Computer Center at Bell Labs in NJ. That didn't keep AT&T from pursuing CSS. -- Wolf N. Paul * 3387 Sam Rayburn Run * Carrollton TX 75007 * (214) 306-9101 UUCP: killer!dcs!wnp ESL: 62832882 DOMAIN: wnp@dcs.UUCP TLX: 910-380-0585 EES PLANO UD