Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:16784 comp.sources.wanted:4433 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!leah!itsgw!nyser!njin!rutgers!galaxy!argus!smforest!wcom!frodo From: frodo@wcom.UUCP (Jim Scardelis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sources.wanted Subject: Re: Information Wanted on PC-1 Keywords: Wanted,PC,PC-1,HELP!!! Message-ID: <262@wcom.UUCP> Date: 28 Jun 88 14:03:30 GMT References: <59@iisat.UUCP> <745@taux01.UUCP> <11057@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: frodo@wcom.UUCP (Jim Scardelis) Organization: Warner Computer Systems, Inc., Little Ferry, NJ Lines: 15 In article <11057@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> ohst-ag@garnet.berkeley.edu writes: >One important exception: some of the OLD PC-1s with the 64K motherboard also >have a very old BIOS that will allow DOS to address only 544K of RAM. I >happen to own one of these little gems and have never bothered to replace >the BIOS to get up to 640. And now, you may never be able to, since IBM discontinued the ROM BIOS upgrades almost a year ago. Of course, I suppose you could upgrade it with a clone BIOS, but somehow, I think the compatibility loss from doing that would be worse than just surviving without the extra memory... -- Jim Scardelis, SA {argus,mtune}!smforest!wcom!frodo #include