Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3615 comp.unix.questions:7784 comp.sys.ibm.pc:16710 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!ihlpa!kai From: kai@ihlpa.ATT.COM (Irwin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools) Keywords: AT&T, lawsuit, CSS, PC/Tools, PC/VI Message-ID: <8318@ihlpa.ATT.COM> Date: 25 Jun 88 00:47:31 GMT References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <142@wash08.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 23 In article <142@wash08.UUCP>, txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) writes: > A friend at ATT told me last year that ATT owned more than afew copies > of the MKS toolkit on DOS PCs at most of their sites in Jersey. If MKS > didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval? > > Timothy Reed > ...uunet!wash08!txr98 Hardly, AT&T Bell Labs, Indian Hill facility (6000+ employees) has (had?) a PC/VI site license from CSS. Some how I don't think that it really matters if a company uses a product or not, I mean look at Microsoft and Apple, I'm sure Microsoft owns more than a few copies of the etch-a-sketch emulator or what ever it is they call the Mac/Lisa operating system. Although I s'pose that's backwards though, hmmm. Ken A. Irwin AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville IH 3D206 (312) 979-4578 ...!ihlpa!kai