Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:20379 comp.sys.amiga.tech:1098
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!amiga!boing!dale
From: dale@boing.UUCP (Dale Luck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Active Window (Re: An annoying feature of 1.1,1.2, etc that I want gone)
Keywords: Suggestion
Message-ID: <339@boing.UUCP>
Date: 24 Jun 88 06:46:24 GMT
References: <4023@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <135@quintus.UUCP> <2166@sugar.UUCP>
Reply-To: dale@boing.UUCP (Dale Luck)
Organization: Boing, Milpitas, Ca.
Lines: 20

In article <2166@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
=In article <135@quintus.UUCP=, pds@quintus.uucp (Peter Schachte) writes:
== Suppose when intuition took the "focus" (keyboard ownership) from window
== A and gave it to window B, it recorded the fact that A was the previous
== owner in B. Then, when B is closed, ownership is given back to A.
=
=It already does something like this. When you open a window it records what
=the active window was when it opened. When it closes, it reactivates that
=window (if it's open). This can be viewed as a stack.

I don't think this is the proper way of handling input refocusing either.
The order of my windows open is usually quite abit different then the order
that I use them in. I would prefer it keep a last active stack, and when
I close the window it should reactivate the last window I had active before
closing this window.
Dale
-- 
Dale Luck     Boing, Inc. {cbmvax|oliveb|pyramid}|!amiga!boing!dale
Although I do contract work for Amiga-LosGatos, my opinions probably
don't represent those of Commodore or its management or its engineers,
but I think the world would be a better place if they did.