Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3594 comp.unix.questions:7758
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools)
Message-ID: <8152@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 24 Jun 88 19:57:45 GMT
References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <308@marob.MASA.COM> <1383@lznv.ATT.COM> <142@wash08.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) )
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 4

In article <142@wash08.UUCP> txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) writes:
>If MKS didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval?

Of course not.