Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3600 comp.unix.questions:7767
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!dcs!wnp
From: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools)
Message-ID: <127@dcs.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jun 88 14:41:40 GMT
References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <308@marob.MASA.COM> <1383@lznv.ATT.COM> <142@wash08.UUCP> <8152@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul)
Organization: DCS, Dallas, Texas
Lines: 15

In article <8152@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) writes:
>In article <142@wash08.UUCP> txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) writes:
>>If MKS didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval?
>
>Of course not.

And I bet that there were (are) a lot of AT&T employees using CSS' PC-VI
and possibly PC-TOOLS and SPELL. One even told me that he had purchased his
copy of PC-VI from the Computer Center at Bell Labs in NJ. 

That didn't keep AT&T from pursuing CSS.
-- 
Wolf N. Paul * 3387 Sam Rayburn Run * Carrollton TX 75007 * (214) 306-9101
UUCP:     killer!dcs!wnp                 ESL: 62832882
DOMAIN:   wnp@dcs.UUCP                   TLX: 910-380-0585 EES PLANO UD