Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!killer!richardh
From: richardh@killer.UUCP (Richard Hargrove)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Let's define our own NULL
Summary: Is this concept really this difficult?
Message-ID: <4593@killer.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jun 88 13:31:17 GMT
References: <160@navtech.uucp> <11326@steinmetz.ge.com> <8147@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas
Lines: 21

In article <8147@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
> [ his umpteenth posting in the last year of the correct interpretation of 
>   what NULL means and how to use it properly ]

C'mon folks. How many times does Doug [Guy, Henry, Chris, {your favorite
comp.lang.c regular}] have to explain this? Is this concept REALLY this
difficult? 

While I normally read anything posted by the regulars, I now skip postings
that contain NULL in the Subject:, regardless of author. Am I the only
person out here who is tired of the interminable discussion of NULL?

I think Doug shows remarkable patience by continuing to respond to this one.
He certainly has more than I do.

I think we need to start the "= vs. ==" discuusion up again. It's been
dormant for about six weeks now... ;-)

richard hargrove
...!{ihnp4 | codas | cbosgd}!killer!richardh
--------------------------------------------