Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:16843 sci.math.stat:374 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!noao!arizona!naucse!wew From: wew@naucse.UUCP (Bill Wilson) Newsgroups: micro.ibm,comp.sys.ibm.pc,sci.math.stat Subject: Re: Sysgraph for the IBM PC Message-ID: <764@naucse.UUCP> Date: 30 Jun 88 14:58:23 GMT References: <5329@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> Organization: Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Lines: 14 From article <5329@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>, by burgin@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Robert Burgin): > > Has anyone had enough experience with Systat on the IBM PC > to offer any arguments pro or con? > Last year I performed an analysis of statistical packages for MS DOS machines and Systat came out on top. It is a fully featured statistical package with very good accuracy. One of the other draws are the site license arrangments that are available. It is also available on a number of machines including Vax. -- Bill Wilson (Bitnet: ucc2wew@nauvm) Northern AZ Univ Flagstaff, AZ 86011 {These views are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer}