Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ubc-cs!van-bc!root
From: lphillips@lpami.van-bc.UUCP (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Process priorities and clock accuracy
Message-ID: <1837@van-bc.UUCP>
Date: 26 Jun 88 21:40:52 GMT
Sender: root@van-bc.UUCP
Lines: 26


In <8806260749.AA10296@jade.berkeley.edu>, CRONEJP@UREGINA1.BITNET (Jonathan Crone) writes:
 >The reason that i called the guy that wrote RSLclock a twit
 >about the priority 20 thing (it REALLY is a nice thingy otherwise)

  I guess what really irritated me is that you didn't pay a whole lot for
that piece of software, yet felt that it was OK to call the author a twit.
If I have a piece of PD or shareware software that misbehaves, I either fix
it or refrain from using it.

  In the case of RSLClock, I don't use it because the clock is in a window
of its own, and causes the scrolling to mess up (calls to the layers
library).  I have mentioned this to the author, though neither he nor I see
any way around it that won't break something, somewhere. The priority
problem has been fixed in the latest release.

-larry

--
If all the MSDos machines were laid end to end,
  they still wouldn't be as fun as a single Amiga.
+----------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                          |
| \X/    {ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision,uunet}!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322                                  |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+