Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:20379 comp.sys.amiga.tech:1098 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!amiga!boing!dale From: dale@boing.UUCP (Dale Luck) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Active Window (Re: An annoying feature of 1.1,1.2, etc that I want gone) Keywords: Suggestion Message-ID: <339@boing.UUCP> Date: 24 Jun 88 06:46:24 GMT References: <4023@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <135@quintus.UUCP> <2166@sugar.UUCP> Reply-To: dale@boing.UUCP (Dale Luck) Organization: Boing, Milpitas, Ca. Lines: 20 In article <2166@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: =In article <135@quintus.UUCP=, pds@quintus.uucp (Peter Schachte) writes: == Suppose when intuition took the "focus" (keyboard ownership) from window == A and gave it to window B, it recorded the fact that A was the previous == owner in B. Then, when B is closed, ownership is given back to A. = =It already does something like this. When you open a window it records what =the active window was when it opened. When it closes, it reactivates that =window (if it's open). This can be viewed as a stack. I don't think this is the proper way of handling input refocusing either. The order of my windows open is usually quite abit different then the order that I use them in. I would prefer it keep a last active stack, and when I close the window it should reactivate the last window I had active before closing this window. Dale -- Dale Luck Boing, Inc. {cbmvax|oliveb|pyramid}|!amiga!boing!dale Although I do contract work for Amiga-LosGatos, my opinions probably don't represent those of Commodore or its management or its engineers, but I think the world would be a better place if they did.