Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!labrea!agate!eos!ames!zorch!pacbell!att!mtunx!mtuxo!mtgzz!drutx!druco!spear From: spear@druco.ATT.COM (Steve Spearman) Newsgroups: unix-pc.general Subject: Re: mailx for 3b1 ver 3.0 Message-ID: <2920@druco.ATT.COM> Date: 21 Jun 88 17:22:29 GMT References: <739@naucse.UUCP> Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO Lines: 22 in article <739@naucse.UUCP>, sbw@naucse.UUCP (Steve Wampler) says: > Xref: druco comp.sys.att:3489 unix-pc.general:190 > > From article <4505@killer.UUCP>, by sean@killer.UUCP (Sean McCollister): >> In article <916@flatline.UUCP>, erict@flatline.UUCP (j eric townsend) writes: >> As far as I know, mailx for unix-pc is available only to AT&T employees. > Ok, I'll believe that. Now, what can us po' folk do to try and get that > changed? Is there anyone we should write in such an attempt... I hope that everyone recognizes that a company as big as AT&T can be rather poor at internal communication. There are quite a few of us AT&T employees on the net with Unix PCs, and believe me that we are not happy about the situation either. Personally, I tried some internal suggestion lines to get some of this stuff released and it just fell into a black hole. It would be nice if those people within AT&T who are at least close to the software distribution process (and there are some of you out there I know) would at least attempt to obtain some explanations to tell everybody. It really does look crummy that we won't give it away and we won't sell it and we won't even say why. Steve Spearman (att, ihtlt, ihnp4)!booboo!spear Definitely not speaking for AT&T