Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tektronix!tekgen!tekigm2!neals
From: neals@tekigm2.TEK.COM (Neal Sedell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 80388 (was: Re: Intel 386SX chip & its applications)
Message-ID: <3118@tekigm2.TEK.COM>
Date: 27 Jun 88 17:29:15 GMT
References: <206900116@prism> <3617@tekgvs.TEK.COM> <5729@gssc.UUCP>
Reply-To: neals@tekigm2.UUCP (Neal Sedell)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Vancouver, WA, USA
Lines: 18

In article <5729@gssc.UUCP> bradd@gssc.UUCP (Brad Davis) writes:
>
> ... deleted ...
>
>   Try this: Find someone familiar with the guts of PCs, but who hasn't
>heard of the announcement yet.  Ask him what a "386SX" is, and you will
>probably get a blank stare.  Then ask what an "80388" would be, and he will
>describe what Intel announced.

probably true, but if you realllllly think about it, the present 80386 SHOULD
be a 80382, and the 80386SX should be a 80386, using the last digit of the
data bus width.  Right????????

What can I say.  It's Monday morning (again!)

Waiting for the 80584, ;-)
-- 
Neal