Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3587 comp.unix.questions:7754 comp.sys.ibm.pc:16650
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wash08!txr98
From: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools)
Keywords: AT&T, lawsuit, CSS, PC/Tools, PC/VI
Message-ID: <142@wash08.UUCP>
Date: 24 Jun 88 02:40:49 GMT
References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <308@marob.MASA.COM> <1383@lznv.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed)
Organization: American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Lines: 6

A friend at ATT told me last year that ATT owned more than afew copies
of the MKS toolkit on DOS PCs at most of their sites in Jersey.  If MKS
didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval?

Timothy Reed
...uunet!wash08!txr98