Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:20632 comp.sys.amiga.tech:1152 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdahl!kim From: kim@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Active Window (Re: An annoying feature of 1.1,1.2, etc that I want gone) Message-ID: <912hQf4cq71010PFlGc@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> Date: 30 Jun 88 01:14:22 GMT References: <4023@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <135@quintus.UUCP> <2166@sugar.UUCP> <46087UH2@PSUVM> Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Lines: 26 In article <46087UH2@PSUVM>, UH2@PSUVM.BITNET (Lee Sailer) writes: > I haven't tried it yet, but wouldn't DMouse help with the problem of > Requestor Activation? What happens if I keep the mouse arrow over to the > right side and an "active" requestor pops up. Does DMouse reactivate the > window the arrow is over? About 70% of the time, the window gets activated; about 30% of the time the (string gadget in the) requester does. Exactly *which* will be active after the requester pops up seems to be entirely random, as repeated experimentation using vt100's "change dir" function will produce either result ... without moving the mouse, or doing anything else to the system (until, of course, the window gets activated instead of the requester ... in which case, you must move the mouse to click into the requester in order to respond to it). Any ideas for fixing this bug? /kim -- UUCP: kim@amdahl.amdahl.com or: {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,uunet,oliveb,ames}!amdahl!kim DDD: 408-746-8462 USPS: Amdahl Corp. M/S 249, 1250 E. Arques Av, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 CIS: 76535,25