Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3616 unix-pc.general:917 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!chinet!tarkus!jcs From: jcs@tarkus.UUCP (John C. Sucilla) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general Subject: Re: OBM Message-ID: <109@tarkus.UUCP> Date: 20 Jun 88 01:57:38 GMT References: <293@uncle.UUCP> <137@limbic.UUCP> <1020@hsi.UUCP> Reply-To: jcs@tarkus.UUCP (John C. Sucilla) Organization: tarkus -- Calumet City, IL. Lines: 28 In article <1020@hsi.UUCP> stevens@hsi.UUCP (Richard Stevens) writes: >In article <137@limbic.UUCP>, gil@limbic.UUCP (Gil Kloepfer Jr.) writes: >> >> One more point of clarification -- a lot of folks have been beating the >> OBM (on-board modem) to death on the net, as well as port tty000. Please >> folks, the hardware is not at fault. >> > >I think the OBM is real junk, especially coming from "the" phone >company. Blah Blah Blah >Seems like Telebit understands the 1200 baud protocol better than AT&T. Yeah right. The people who *wrote* the standard don't understand it. >Why is it the non-AT&T modems are so much better than the AT&T >modems ?? They aren't. What you need to understand is that your hardware was designed by Convergent, not AT&T. -- John "C". Sucilla, A silicon based life form. {ihnp4,chinet,ddsw1}!tarkus!jcs You have a better idea? Now's the time..