Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:16843 sci.math.stat:374
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!noao!arizona!naucse!wew
From: wew@naucse.UUCP (Bill Wilson)
Newsgroups: micro.ibm,comp.sys.ibm.pc,sci.math.stat
Subject: Re: Sysgraph for the IBM PC
Message-ID: <764@naucse.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jun 88 14:58:23 GMT
References: <5329@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>
Organization: Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Lines: 14

From article <5329@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>, by burgin@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Robert Burgin):
> 
> Has anyone had enough experience with Systat on the IBM PC
> to offer any arguments pro or con?
> 
Last year I performed an analysis of statistical packages for MS
DOS machines and Systat came out on top.  It is a fully featured 
statistical package with very good accuracy.  One of the other draws
are the site license arrangments that are available.  It is also
available on a number of machines including Vax.
-- 
Bill Wilson                          (Bitnet: ucc2wew@nauvm)
Northern AZ Univ
Flagstaff, AZ 86011
{These views are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer}