Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:3587 comp.unix.questions:7754 comp.sys.ibm.pc:16650 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wash08!txr98 From: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools) Keywords: AT&T, lawsuit, CSS, PC/Tools, PC/VI Message-ID: <142@wash08.UUCP> Date: 24 Jun 88 02:40:49 GMT References: <403@mancol.UUCP> <102@dcs.UUCP> <395@hotlr.ATT> <109@dcs.UUCP> <308@marob.MASA.COM> <1383@lznv.ATT.COM> Reply-To: txr98@wash08.UUCP (Timothy Reed) Organization: American Chemical Society, Washington, DC Lines: 6 A friend at ATT told me last year that ATT owned more than afew copies of the MKS toolkit on DOS PCs at most of their sites in Jersey. If MKS didn't license unix from ATT, would that be considered tacit approval? Timothy Reed ...uunet!wash08!txr98