Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!mtunx!whuts!mhuxh!mhuxu!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuhk!mhuxo!ulysses!andante!ki4pv!tanner
From: tanner@ki4pv.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ?? in existing source code
Message-ID: <6948@ki4pv.uucp>
Date: 4 Jun 88 14:58:21 GMT
References: <14830@brl-adm.ARPA> <6944@ki4pv.uucp> <8003@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Organization: CompuData, Inc., DeLand
Lines: 7
X-query: So here it is June.  Why are they still having basketball?

In article <8003@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
) [cites my stats on "??" presence] [includes list of trigraphs]
> So, would any of them be adversely impacted by the trigraph mappings?

Well, now that you mention it, yes.  Some of these WOULD be replaced
by a trigraph-swallowing compiler.
-- 
{allegra codas killer decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!tanner