Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!killer!richardh From: richardh@killer.UUCP (Richard Hargrove) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Let's define our own NULL Summary: Is this concept really this difficult? Message-ID: <4593@killer.UUCP> Date: 25 Jun 88 13:31:17 GMT References: <160@navtech.uucp> <11326@steinmetz.ge.com> <8147@brl-smoke.ARPA> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 21 In article <8147@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes: > [ his umpteenth posting in the last year of the correct interpretation of > what NULL means and how to use it properly ] C'mon folks. How many times does Doug [Guy, Henry, Chris, {your favorite comp.lang.c regular}] have to explain this? Is this concept REALLY this difficult? While I normally read anything posted by the regulars, I now skip postings that contain NULL in the Subject:, regardless of author. Am I the only person out here who is tired of the interminable discussion of NULL? I think Doug shows remarkable patience by continuing to respond to this one. He certainly has more than I do. I think we need to start the "= vs. ==" discuusion up again. It's been dormant for about six weeks now... ;-) richard hargrove ...!{ihnp4 | codas | cbosgd}!killer!richardh --------------------------------------------