Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!mtunx!whuts!mhuxh!mhuxu!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuhk!mhuxo!ulysses!andante!ki4pv!tanner From: tanner@ki4pv.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: ?? in existing source code Message-ID: <6948@ki4pv.uucp> Date: 4 Jun 88 14:58:21 GMT References: <14830@brl-adm.ARPA> <6944@ki4pv.uucp> <8003@brl-smoke.ARPA> Organization: CompuData, Inc., DeLand Lines: 7 X-query: So here it is June. Why are they still having basketball? In article <8003@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes: ) [cites my stats on "??" presence] [includes list of trigraphs] > So, would any of them be adversely impacted by the trigraph mappings? Well, now that you mention it, yes. Some of these WOULD be replaced by a trigraph-swallowing compiler. -- {allegra codas killer decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!tanner