Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ubc-cs!van-bc!root From: lphillips@lpami.van-bc.UUCP (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Process priorities and clock accuracy Message-ID: <1837@van-bc.UUCP> Date: 26 Jun 88 21:40:52 GMT Sender: root@van-bc.UUCP Lines: 26 In <8806260749.AA10296@jade.berkeley.edu>, CRONEJP@UREGINA1.BITNET (Jonathan Crone) writes: >The reason that i called the guy that wrote RSLclock a twit >about the priority 20 thing (it REALLY is a nice thingy otherwise) I guess what really irritated me is that you didn't pay a whole lot for that piece of software, yet felt that it was OK to call the author a twit. If I have a piece of PD or shareware software that misbehaves, I either fix it or refrain from using it. In the case of RSLClock, I don't use it because the clock is in a window of its own, and causes the scrolling to mess up (calls to the layers library). I have mentioned this to the author, though neither he nor I see any way around it that won't break something, somewhere. The priority problem has been fixed in the latest release. -larry -- If all the MSDos machines were laid end to end, they still wouldn't be as fun as a single Amiga. +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | // Larry Phillips | | \X/ {ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision,uunet}!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 | +----------------------------------------------------------------+