Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:929 comp.sys.att:3632 unix-pc.uucp:33 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!umd5!umbc3!alex From: alex@umbc3.UMD.EDU (Alex S. Crain) Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.att,unix-pc.uucp Subject: Re: HDB and rel 3.0: Should I upgrade to HDB? Keywords: HDB, 3.0, uucp, unix-pc Message-ID: <1045@umbc3.UMD.EDU> Date: 27 Jun 88 20:12:12 GMT References: <936@flatline.UUCP> <315@ditka.UUCP> <577@n8emr.UUCP> <479@galaxia.zone1.com> Reply-To: alex@umbc3.UMD.EDU (Alex S. Crain) Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Lines: 19 In article <479@galaxia.zone1.com> dave@galaxia.zone1.com (David H. Brierley) writes: >In article <577@n8emr.UUCP> gws@n8emr.UUCP (Gary Sanders (n8emr)) writes: >Here's a good question for you all. Suppose that I was one of those "few > folks" that grabbed HDB during it's shorted-lived appearance on the STORE. > [is HDB3.0 PD?] My understanding of the copyright laws is that if AT&T conciously released something without restriction, then they cannot later change their mind. This belief comes from a long description of the copyright laws that was posted to the net last year by someone who appears to know about such things. (claimed to be a lawyer, but I won't hold it against him) -- :alex. nerwin!alex@umbc3.umd.edu alex@umbc3.umd.edu