Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!denali!karish
From: karish@denali.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Request BSD 4.23!
Message-ID: <22095@labrea.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 1 Jun 88 13:07:58 GMT
References: <14490@brl-adm.ARPA> <11612@mimsy.UUCP> <7843@ncoast.UUCP>
Sender: news@labrea.Stanford.EDU
Reply-To: karish@denali.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish)
Organization: Mindcraft, Inc.
Lines: 24

In article <7843@ncoast.UUCP> allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) writes:
>As quoted from <11612@mimsy.UUCP> by chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek):
>+---------------
>| 4.3BSD, which has (as mentioned) hundreds of fixes over 4.2BSD.  You need
>| an AT&T source license (32V or later) and (I think) $1500 to get 4.3BSD.
>+---------------
>Is an AT&T-Toolchest source license ($200, last I checked) sufficient to get
>4.3BSD sources?
>
>(If so, 4.3BSD is extremely affordable... unless, of course, that $1500 was
>off by an order of magnitude.  Maybe THAT's where AT&T *really* screwed up.)

Berkeley wants a cut.  Two years ago, a license cost $1000 for the group
I was working with, WITHIN UC.

I doubt that AT&T considers a Toolchest source license equivalent to
a 32V license.  The 32V license was cheap, a short while ago, to
academic users: a fixed price (well under $1000) for any number of CPUs
in the same department requested at the same time.

Chuck Karish	ARPA:	karish@denali.stanford.edu
		BITNET:	karish%denali@forsythe.stanford.edu
		UUCP:	{decvax,hplabs!hpda}!mindcrf!karish
		USPS:	1825 California St. #5   Mountain View, CA 94041