Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!necntc!ima!haddock!karl
From: karl@haddock.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: C++ default comparison operator
Message-ID: <4315@haddock.ISC.COM>
Date: 1 Jun 88 00:34:27 GMT
References: <28535@cca.CCA.COM> <1988May24.170429.994@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer)
Organization: Interactive Systems, Boston
Lines: 11

In article <1988May24.170429.994@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>[some unattributed person notes that struct/class assignment is now defined
>as recursive memberwise assignment, and asks about extending this concept to
>equality comparison]
>
>Here's one against:  how do you compare unions?

Why should the compare feature include unions?  Surely, unions aren't covered
by the new assignment feature.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint