Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!necntc!ima!haddock!karl From: karl@haddock.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: C++ default comparison operator Message-ID: <4315@haddock.ISC.COM> Date: 1 Jun 88 00:34:27 GMT References: <28535@cca.CCA.COM> <1988May24.170429.994@utzoo.uucp> Reply-To: karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) Organization: Interactive Systems, Boston Lines: 11 In article <1988May24.170429.994@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes: >[some unattributed person notes that struct/class assignment is now defined >as recursive memberwise assignment, and asks about extending this concept to >equality comparison] > >Here's one against: how do you compare unions? Why should the compare feature include unions? Surely, unions aren't covered by the new assignment feature. Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint