Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!husc6!purdue!umd5!mimsy!chris From: chris@mimsy.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Trusting operating systems: vendor or university? Message-ID: <11812@mimsy.UUCP> Date: 4 Jun 88 19:25:20 GMT References: <1128@mcgill-vision.UUCP> <55239@sun.uucp> <1133@mcgill-vision.UUCP> Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742 Lines: 27 >In article <55239@sun.uucp> limes@sun.uucp (Greg Limes) writes [pro vendor]: >>If the operating system does not work properly, the company gets >>bug reports and has to fix them In article <1133@mcgill-vision.UUCP> mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP (der Mouse) answers [pro university]: >They do? In my experience they generally ignore the bug reports. ... >my notion of fixing a bug involves getting a fix to the person with >the problem within a week. (or at least a `hm, yes, that is a bug/ no, that is a feature | here is a workaround | we have no idea how to fix it yet but we are working on it', not dead silence: we can get dead silence from Berkeley for free :-) ) >Not "in the next major release - and oh yes, that will cost you $2500[1]". My own experience agrees with that of der Mouse, and applies to hardware vendors as well as software (viz. Emulex). Bug reports never get any answer, though the bugs do sometimes get fixed. Why should I pay for this `service' when UCB CSRG operates more or less the same way? And in their case the silence is excusable (CSRG can be described as `five guys weilding source code', and there is no one left to answer bug reports). -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris