Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!sdcrdcf!csun!polyslo!dorourke From: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Easy to Learn Mac Programming Environment Message-ID: <3035@polyslo.UUCP> Date: 2 Jun 88 04:05:27 GMT References: <8805240408.AA01675@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <2843@polyslo.UUCP> <4200@sdcc3.ucsd.EDU> <2948@polyslo.UUCP> <4685@husc6.harvard.edu> Reply-To: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP (David O'Rourke) Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo Lines: 10 Posted: Thu Jun 2 00:05:27 1988 In article <4685@husc6.harvard.edu> singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) writes: > Macintosh Pascal is not an alternative. Because there's no real runtime There is a runtime enviroment so that you don't have to distribute source code. Although I agree LSP is better and you should get that instead. -- David M. O'Rourke Disclaimer: I don't represent the school. All opinions are mine!