Xref: utzoo news.admin:2459 news.sysadmin:732
Path: utzoo!lsuc!ncrcan!ziebmef!becker
From: becker@ziebmef.uucp (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.sysadmin
Subject: Re: FCC?  U.S.Mail.? (Re: JJ's Revenge -- Part II)
Message-ID: <1988Jun7.160026.13818@ziebmef.uucp>
Date: 7 Jun 88 20:00:25 GMT
References: <7823@ncoast.UUCP> <5927@uwmcsd1.UUCP> <1236@ssc.UUCP> 
Reply-To: becker@ziebmef.UUCP (Bruce Becker)
Organization: Ziebmef Public Access BBS/Unix
Lines: 28

In article  webber@aramis.rutgers.edu (Bob Webber) writes:
>In article <1236@ssc.UUCP>, fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes:
>> 
>> Does anyone know if the FCC would be interested in JJ?  He is using
>> stuff regulated by them to continue his scam.
>
>Actually, more to the point, does anyone want the FCC or the U.S.Mail snooping
>around Usenet trying to figure out how to use his postings in court and
>incidently whether they shouldn't be exercising more visable control over
>such a visable underground communications system as Usenet?
>
>Geez.
>
>----- BOB (webber@athos.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!athos.rutgers.edu!webber)

I for one agree with Bob. First of all, 'JJ' wasn't running a 'scam', just
being a dink... Secondly, it would have to be a really serious felony-type
problem that the UseNet system itself could not handle, and which threatented
the well-being of the net and/or its participants.

I don't think that 'JJ' has caused that sort of problem...

Cheers,  Bruce Becker
UUCP:  ...!ncrcan!ziebmef!becker!bdb
BitNet: BECKER@HUMBER


I don't think 'JJ' h