Xref: utzoo news.admin:2459 news.sysadmin:732 Path: utzoo!lsuc!ncrcan!ziebmef!becker From: becker@ziebmef.uucp (Bruce Becker) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.sysadmin Subject: Re: FCC? U.S.Mail.? (Re: JJ's Revenge -- Part II) Message-ID: <1988Jun7.160026.13818@ziebmef.uucp> Date: 7 Jun 88 20:00:25 GMT References: <7823@ncoast.UUCP> <5927@uwmcsd1.UUCP> <1236@ssc.UUCP>Reply-To: becker@ziebmef.UUCP (Bruce Becker) Organization: Ziebmef Public Access BBS/Unix Lines: 28 In article webber@aramis.rutgers.edu (Bob Webber) writes: >In article <1236@ssc.UUCP>, fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes: >> >> Does anyone know if the FCC would be interested in JJ? He is using >> stuff regulated by them to continue his scam. > >Actually, more to the point, does anyone want the FCC or the U.S.Mail snooping >around Usenet trying to figure out how to use his postings in court and >incidently whether they shouldn't be exercising more visable control over >such a visable underground communications system as Usenet? > >Geez. > >----- BOB (webber@athos.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!athos.rutgers.edu!webber) I for one agree with Bob. First of all, 'JJ' wasn't running a 'scam', just being a dink... Secondly, it would have to be a really serious felony-type problem that the UseNet system itself could not handle, and which threatented the well-being of the net and/or its participants. I don't think that 'JJ' has caused that sort of problem... Cheers, Bruce Becker UUCP: ...!ncrcan!ziebmef!becker!bdb BitNet: BECKER@HUMBER I don't think 'JJ' h