Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:345 comp.sys.ibm.pc:16099 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!ncar!gatech!udel!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!nelson From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Source code for shar for pc's Message-ID: <999@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> Date: 26 May 88 14:19:35 GMT References: <1555@bu-tyng.bu.edu> <3186@bsu-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Followup-To: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY Lines: 14 In article <3186@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes: >Better still, we need comp.sources.msdos. Why doesn't somebody propose >it? The net population likes sources, so it should have no trouble >getting approved, and it might even encourage more source postings. The difference between comp.sources.unix and comp.sources.msdos is that you can *count* on a Unix system to have a C compiler, whereas you can't count on *any* MS-DOS system to have any sort of compiler. Of course, given the price of Turbo C, we could standardize on it. ;-) -- char *reply-to-russ(int network) { if(network == BITNET) return "NELSON@CLUTX"; else return "nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu"; }