Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:3033 rec.ham-radio:4973
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!jans
From: jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio
Subject: Re: Re: Low-power TV transmission
Message-ID: <2693@tekcrl.TEK.COM>
Date: 31 May 88 22:03:44 GMT
Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or.
Lines: 25

(Discussion about cheap, low power TV transmitters led to:)
<>



If they are who I think they are, they have good reason to be somewhat 
secretive.  They do not adequately supress the vestigal sideband, and put out a 
6MHz-wide signal, rather than 4MHz, so they will not fit in the television 
allocation for the band plan.  Instead, they've plopped the thing on 436, which 
makes weak-signal types furious, and possibly violates international law and/or 
FCC regulations.  In any event, this device CANNOT be re-crystalled for a 
"normal" channel without causing interference, and CANNOT be operated north of 
the "A" line (roughly Seattle to Green Bay) because of international 
regulations.

If I mixed them up with someone else, I apologise.  Is this the ~$150 box?  It 
would be difficult to build a 4MHz-wide box at that price.  Be suspicious of 
anything under about $300.

:::::: Software Productivity Technologies -- Experiment Manager Project ::::::
:::::: Jan Steinman N7JDB	Box 500, MS 50-383	(w)503/627-5881 ::::::
:::::: jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM	Beaverton, OR 97077	(h)503/657-7703 ::::::