Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!cvaxa!aledm
From: aledm@cvaxa.sussex.ac.uk (Aled Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: trigraphs in X3J11
Summary: \xxx vs. trigraphs wins hands down, but...
Message-ID: <475@cvaxa.sussex.ac.uk>
Date: 30 May 88 12:10:43 GMT
References: <5215@ico.ISC.COM> <10949@apple.Apple.Com>
Organization: School of Cognitive Sciences, Univ of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Lines: 20

In article <10949@apple.Apple.Com>, lenoil@Apple.COM (Robert Lenoil) writes:
> Instead of introducing a totally new notion
> (to C, anyway) of trigraphs, why not simply extend the backslash escape
> mechanism to be valid outside of strings?

I strongly agree with this proposal.  Trigraphs introduce a totally new
feature into the language, which is going to take some getting used to.
I can see some bugs creeping into my strings (and I bet they wont be in
the strings that get used very often, so they won't be easy to spot!)

Just one minor problem---isn't the backslash character one of the glyphs
missing from the Invarient Code Set?  Ah well....

Aled Morris

Janet/Arpa: aledm@uk.ac.sussex.cvaxa   |   School of Cognitive Science
      uucp: ..!mcvax!ukc!cvaxa!aledm   |   University of Sussex
      talk: +44-(0)273-606755  e2372   |   Falmer, Brighton, England
  "I'm living in the future/I feel wonderful/I'm tipping over backwards...
I'm so ambitious/I'm looking back/I'm running a race/and your the book i read"