Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!sdcrdcf!csun!polyslo!dorourke
From: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Easy to Learn Mac Programming Environment
Message-ID: <3035@polyslo.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jun 88 04:05:27 GMT
References: <8805240408.AA01675@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <2843@polyslo.UUCP> <4200@sdcc3.ucsd.EDU> <2948@polyslo.UUCP> <4685@husc6.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP (David O'Rourke)
Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo
Lines: 10
Posted: Thu Jun  2 00:05:27 1988

In article <4685@husc6.harvard.edu> singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) writes:
>	Macintosh Pascal is not an alternative. Because there's no real runtime

   There is a runtime enviroment so that you don't have to distribute source
code.  Although I agree LSP is better and you should get that instead.

-- 
David M. O'Rourke

Disclaimer: I don't represent the school.  All opinions are mine!