Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!mtunx!rutgers!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!eris!mwm
From: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'm in love with my car) Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Another question on the 80286- er, 68000 memory models
Message-ID: <10636@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 7 Jun 88 09:27:04 GMT
References: <8805182223.AA20918@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <2653@louie.udel.EDU> <10507@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <2085@sugar.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica
Lines: 39

In article <2085@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
<> You see, the problems tend to be with globally allocated data,
<> whose address isn't known until link time. So what's an optimiser
<> supposed to do?
<
. (there's your beard, Peter!)

<> On the other hand, subroutine jumps could be to routines that you
<> don't have an address for yet (they may not even have been written yet
<> :-). So once again, the optimiser is missing some important data.
<