Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!leah!itsgw!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!nelson From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: O'pain Software Foundation: (2) Why is it better than AT&T? Message-ID: <1031@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> Date: 6 Jun 88 01:30:54 GMT References: <24369@pyramid.pyramid.com> <355@mipseast.mips.COM> <1017@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <55234@sun.uucp> <196@csd-v.UUCP> Reply-To: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY Lines: 22 In article <196@csd-v.UUCP> bak@csd-v.UUCP (Bruce) writes: >In article <55234@sun.uucp> guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes: >>And I wrote: >>> Parting shot: If IBM is so impressed by Unix, why aren't they on Usenet? [I'm wrong -rn] >>Fascinating theory; the only trouble with it is that IBM *IS* on USENET. [you're right -rn] >Funny I've never seen a contribution with "Organization: IBM..." in >any posting to comp.unix.... [you didn't look -rn] This is the output of `find /usr/spool/news -exec grep Organization:.\*IBM {} \;` Organization: IBM AES, Austin, TX Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY That makes two out of about 11,000 articles. I think that I can be forgiven for not having run across them, but I should have looked before I leaped... -- signed char *reply-to-russ(int network) { /* Why can't BITNET go */ if(network == BITNET) return "NELSON@CLUTX"; /* domainish? */ else return "nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu"; }