Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!leah!itsgw!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!nelson
From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: O'pain Software Foundation: (2) Why is it better than AT&T?
Message-ID: <1031@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Date: 6 Jun 88 01:30:54 GMT
References: <24369@pyramid.pyramid.com> <355@mipseast.mips.COM> <1017@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <55234@sun.uucp> <196@csd-v.UUCP>
Reply-To: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY
Lines: 22

In article <196@csd-v.UUCP> bak@csd-v.UUCP (Bruce) writes:
>In article <55234@sun.uucp> guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
>>And I wrote:
>>> Parting shot: If IBM is so impressed by Unix, why aren't they on Usenet?
							[I'm wrong -rn]
>>Fascinating theory; the only trouble with it is that IBM *IS* on USENET.
							[you're right -rn]
>Funny I've never seen a contribution with "Organization: IBM..." in
>any posting to comp.unix....				[you didn't look -rn]

This is the output of
`find /usr/spool/news -exec grep Organization:.\*IBM {} \;`

Organization: IBM AES, Austin, TX
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY

That makes two out of about 11,000 articles.  I think that I can be forgiven
for not having run across them, but I should have looked before I leaped...
-- 
signed char *reply-to-russ(int network) {	/* Why can't BITNET go	*/
if(network == BITNET) return "NELSON@CLUTX";	/* domainish?		*/
else return "nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu"; }