Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekchips!jans From: jans@tekchips.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k Subject: Re: Re: NS32000 Processor Message-ID: <1467@tekchips.TEK.COM> Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 11:52:16 EDT Article-I.D.: tekchips.1467 Posted: Fri Jul 17 11:52:16 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jul-87 18:00:55 EDT Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or. Lines: 13 grenley@nsc.nsc.com (George Grenley) writes, quotes: >In <10192@amdahl.amdahl.com> chongo@amdahl.UUCP (Landon Curt Noll) writes: >>>In article <4399@nsc.nsc.com> roger@nsc.nsc.com (Roger Thompson) writes: >>>When IBM was out searching for a micro, our CPU was stable... >>I seem to recall a LONG LONG road from the Rev E 16032 (that could almost >>keep a Un*x kernel running) to a Rev R (that is almost bug free)... >Landon, I guess we all know by now that you're not too fond of NSC... I think either Landon has too much time on his hands, or he's just a National-baiter. Why else would someone spend valuable working hours reading a newsgroup devoted to a processor they hate? It would be nice to see some serious discussion for a change.