Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!cuae2!killer!academ!sob
From: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: How do you handle large mailing lists?
Message-ID: <166@academ.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Jul-87 18:31:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: academ.166
Posted: Fri Jul 24 18:31:18 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jul-87 21:18:45 EDT
References: <3600@felix.UUCP> <23828@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber)
Distribution: na
Organization: ACADEM Computer Systems, Houston, Tx
Lines: 20
Xref: mnetor comp.mail.misc:439 comp.unix.wizards:3433

In article <23828@sun.uucp> nowicki%rose@Sun.COM (Bill Nowicki) writes:
> We fed bug fixes back to Berkeley, and the 4.3BSD sendmail is much
> better than the 4.2BSD one.  I am biased, but I
> think the SunOS 3.4 (and SunOS 4.0!) sendmails are even better.
>
>	-- WIN

The SunOS3.4 sendmail does not support MX records. It also does not support
the $[ $] cannonicalization convention. These two things alone make it 
difficult to use the SunOS 3.4 sendmail on an internet Sun that has to
deal with lots of mail. I would hope the SunOS 4.0 sendmail can do this 
stuff.

Stan Barber


-- 
Stan	     uucp:{killer,rice,hoptoad}!academ!sob     Opinions expressed here
Olan         domain:sob@tmc.edu                            are ONLY mine &
Barber       CIS:71565,623   BBS:(713)790-9004               noone else's.