Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ll-xn!ames!oliveb!sun!news From: news@sun.uucp (news) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Readability of right justified text Message-ID: <22908@sun.uucp> Date: Wed, 8-Jul-87 12:33:49 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.22908 Posted: Wed Jul 8 12:33:49 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 17:08:50 EDT Distribution: comp Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Mtn View, CA Lines: 30 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com Date: Wed, 8 Jul 87 07:37:22 edt From: decwrl!decvax!savax!nhqvax::fleischmann A number of people have recently commented on the readability/non- readability of right justified text. In siting studies to support either side, people should remember to determine whether the text used for the study was generated using true typesetting equipment that controlled the kerning (space between each character) and intra-word spacing or some fixed-width printer that justifies by only increasing the intra-word spacing. I have seen a number of studies done by people that only used text generated by fixed-with printers off word-processing systems that tend to "fragment" a line by putting large gaps between words so that it no longer reads as a sentence but as a series of individual words. These documents become very difficult to read. On the other hand. True typesetting systems can justify by controlling not only the intra-word spacing but the intra-character spacing for that line so that the eye does travel from word to word in a smooth and consistant fashion. /marc ---------------------------------------- Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop-request Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM Delphi: CHUQ Touch Not the Cat Bot a Glove -- MacIntosh Clan Motto