Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site hoptoad.uucp
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Should sources be in alt.sources?
Message-ID: <2492@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Wed, 22-Jul-87 19:43:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.2492
Posted: Wed Jul 22 19:43:52 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 01:22:06 EDT
References: <2544@husc6.UUCP> <864@dasys1.UUCP> <2211@oliveb.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 8

I recommend putting source discussions in comp.sources.d as usual.
The only reason alt.sources exists is because comp.sources.misc is
moderated.  I don't mind a few non-source postings if they are
relevant, but it sets a bad example for people who have irrelevant things
to say.
-- 
{dasys1,ncoast,well,sun,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu	     gnu@postgres.berkeley.edu
Alt.all: the alternative radio of the Usenet.