Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ken
From: ken@rochester.arpa (Ken Yap)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.misc,sci.lang
Subject: Re: "non-compliant"
Message-ID: <484@sol.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 8-Jul-87 12:25:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: sol.484
Posted: Wed Jul  8 12:25:24 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 06:47:00 EDT
References: <1634@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Reply-To: ken@rochester.UUCP (Ken Yap)
Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY
Lines: 4
Xref: mnetor comp.lang.fortran:154 comp.lang.misc:517 sci.lang:1086

Do the standards documents really use the word "compliant"? I thought
the usual term was "conforming".

	Ken