Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekchips!jans
From: jans@tekchips.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: Re: NS32000 Processor
Message-ID: <1467@tekchips.TEK.COM>
Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 11:52:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekchips.1467
Posted: Fri Jul 17 11:52:16 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jul-87 18:00:55 EDT
Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or.
Lines: 13

grenley@nsc.nsc.com (George Grenley) writes, quotes:
>In <10192@amdahl.amdahl.com> chongo@amdahl.UUCP (Landon Curt Noll) writes:
>>>In article <4399@nsc.nsc.com> roger@nsc.nsc.com (Roger Thompson) writes:
>>>When IBM was out searching for a micro, our CPU was stable... 
>>I seem to recall a LONG LONG road from the Rev E 16032 (that could almost
>>keep a Un*x kernel running) to a Rev R (that is almost bug free)... 
>Landon, I guess we all know by now that you're not too fond of NSC...

I think either Landon has too much time on his hands, or he's just a 
National-baiter.  Why else would someone spend valuable working hours reading a 
newsgroup devoted to a processor they hate?

It would be nice to see some serious discussion for a change.