Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!ames!ll-xn!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: pointer alignment when int != char * Message-ID: <6079@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Tue, 7-Jul-87 15:20:05 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6079 Posted: Tue Jul 7 15:20:05 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Jul-87 01:50:23 EDT References: <493@its63b.ed.ac.uk> <6061@brl-smoke.ARPA> <3812@spool.WISC.EDU> <688@haddock.UUCP> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 5 In article <688@haddock.UUCP> karl@haddock.ISC.COM.UUCP (Karl Heuer) writes: >Hasn't ANSI removed all pretense of pointers being integerizable? No -- it doesn't REQUIRE that they be, but it does provide some constraints in the case that the implementation supports this (as many do).