Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!kamath From: kamath@reed.UUCP (Sean Kamath) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: No mail (problems getting in touch for DCOM mailing!!!!!) Message-ID: <6704@reed.UUCP> Date: Sat, 25-Jul-87 15:09:28 EDT Article-I.D.: reed.6704 Posted: Sat Jul 25 15:09:28 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jul-87 04:37:44 EDT References: <8707231529.aa07478@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA> Reply-To: kamath@reed.UUCP (Sean Kamath) Distribution: world Organization: Reed College, Portland OR Lines: 41 In article <8707231529.aa07478@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA> SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET writes: >I haven't received anything from info-apple since last Monday (20th) in >the wee hours (messages dated July 17). Have you been getting lots of >"undelivered mail" from bitnet addresses? Yes. >Have you been receiving incoming from bitnet (wiscvm hasn't been >returning your mail as undelivered, so I assume it's getting there)? >If you receive this, mail is getting there; so the question is howcome >it's not going the other way? Well, I got this, and it was dated two days ago, July 23. I have been having a lot of mail bounce back from wiscvm, but not just them. I believe that things are going on in the UUCP world. I know that Reed just instituted a new sendmail, which now allows for '@' syntax, at least to a degree. Now I am getting a bunch of "user not found" errors and such. I have tried to send out a lot of notes to people who want the Novation Apple-Cat drivers, but I can't seem to get through to them. If you sent me a note, but did not get a reply, please send me another. If you get the sources, then send me a note (even if you already have done so.). If you want them, send me a note. I am going to figure out what is going on, and then everyone should get a note asking to repond to that note, so I know I am talking to you. Then you will recieve five files. I assume (or am going to assume) that from now on it is valid to specify a BITNET path from UUCP with the '%' syntax, i.e. user%foo.BITNET%bletch.UUCP but there is never much hope that will work. ug. Sean kamath the following probably don't work any more. :-( -- UUCP: {decvax allegra ucbcad ucbvax hplabs ihnp4}!tektronix!reed!kamath CSNET: reed!kamath@Tektronix.CSNET || BITNET: reed!kamath@Berkeley.BITNET ARPA: tektronix!reed!kamath@Berkeleyreed!kamath@hplabs US Snail: 3934 SE Boise, Portland, OR 97202 (I hate 4 line .sigs!)