Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Xerox 6085 vs. IBM AT vs. SUN 3/nnn Message-ID: <23522@sun.uucp> Date: Wed, 15-Jul-87 12:56:37 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.23522 Posted: Wed Jul 15 12:56:37 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jul-87 06:44:29 EDT Sender: news@sun.uucp Distribution: comp Lines: 13 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com Date: Wed, 15 Jul 87 10:21:05 EDT From: weiss@bigburd.PRC.Unisys.COM (Tom Weiss) Organization: Unisys Corporation, Paoli Research Center; Paoli, PA I have no experience with Xerox, but I can tell you that the Sun is MUCH, MUCH better (not to mention more expensive) than the IBM AT for desktop publishing or anything else you might ever want to do with a computer. The Sun is faster, runs Unix native, has Xwindows and NeWS for graphics, and can run much larger software packages. ---------------------------------------- Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop-request Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun