Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!UNCAEDU.BITNET!kieffer
From: kieffer@UNCAEDU.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: JANET addressing
Message-ID: <870717085150.0i7@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA>
Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 10:51:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: UcEdu.870717085150.0i7
Posted: Fri Jul 17 10:51:49 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Jul-87 07:13:41 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 43

The following is a message I was sending to a JANET address, in fact a
reply to the sender. It got bounced locally.
I thought I would include the text to illustrate the type of addressing
problem we experience with with JANET sites.
(this should not start a mail chain in the vms list, please address
replies to KIEFFER@UNCAEDU
---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
From:     Delivr@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA
Subject:  Undeliverable Mail
To:       
Comment:  reason for return --
Comment:   Unknown host or domain
Comment:    bitnet - %ROUTE-E-NONODE, No such node is defined
Comment:  the affected addresses follow ...
Comment:  craa055%uk.ac.kcl.cc.vaxb@ac.uk

Start of returned message

  Date:    Fri, 17 Jul 87 08:00:18 MDT
  From:    kieffer @ ucedu.unca.adhocnet.ca
  Message-Id: <870717080018.0hs@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA>
  Subject: RE: JANET addresses
  To:      craa055%uk.ac.kcl.cc.vaxb @ ac.uk
  X-ST-Vmsmail-To: UCEDU::ST%"CRAA055%UK.AC.KCL.CC.VAXB@AC.UK"

  Subj: JANET addresses

  We have been using a different addressing scheme to reach JANET sites from
  Bitnet:

              user%uk.ac.open.acs.vax@ukacrl

  for example, and it has worked well for us. Since I did not see this
  gateway in the original message, I wonder whether I should switch to
  one of those that are listed?

   rom kieffer
   UofCalgary
   Canada


End of returned message