Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!dg1v+ From: dg1v+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest Subject: handling the S.G.P issue Message-ID:Date: Tue, 7-Jul-87 07:33:49 EDT Article-I.D.: andrew.QUwBmRy00Uw8ADo0Df Posted: Tue Jul 7 07:33:49 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 13:47:35 EDT References: <977@mind.UUCP> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 16 Approved: ailist@stripe.sri.com While some of the discussion has proven interesting, it is become burdensome to sort through and rather recursive as arguments start focusing on what prior arguments meant... Perhaps a seperate bboard would be more appropriate. At the very least, Ken Laws' suggestion that the arguments (and subject lines) be broken into discrete categories seems to go a long way toward making this disscussion palatable if not worthwhile. Mr. Harnad might want to consider proposing a subject taxonomy prefaced with "SGP". David Greene Carnegie Mellon