Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!sri-spam!ames!oliveb!sun!pepper!cmcmanis From: cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Sun NeWS on the Amiga Message-ID: <23815@sun.uucp> Date: Mon, 20-Jul-87 13:19:46 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.23815 Posted: Mon Jul 20 13:19:46 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 21-Jul-87 06:27:17 EDT References: <478@sbcs.UUCP> <1386@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <3577@well.UUCP> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) Distribution: comp Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View Lines: 19 For reasons that should seem patently obvious to anyone I can't make any sweeping statements about NeWS on the Amiga. I can say that some people do not think ahead to far before they say something. Which can be a bad thing if it causes more problems than it solves, smoke aside I can address one of Leo's statements : In article <3577@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes: > I think the optimal solution would be for SUN to sell the Amiga >version of NeWS, or license someone to sell it, with a return to SUN. >After all, they wrote the bloody thing; they're entitled to *something*. >All we can hope for is that they don't change SUN prices for it. Sun sells the NeWS binary tape for Sun 3's for $100, what did you pay for Dpaint? --Chuck McManis uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis BIX: cmcmanis ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.