Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brandx.rutgers.edu!webber From: webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: EndOfSourcesList+AnnouncementOfNetOmbudsman Message-ID: <275@brandx.rutgers.edu> Date: Fri, 3-Jul-87 00:51:35 EDT Article-I.D.: brandx.275 Posted: Fri Jul 3 00:51:35 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 10:14:46 EDT References: <267@brandx.rutgers.edu> <1610@celtics.UUCP> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 17 Keywords: solving the moderation bottleneck Summary: this sounds great In article <1610@celtics.UUCP>, roger@celtics.UUCP (Roger B.A. Klorese) writes: > This is the biggest bunch of crap I have ever seen. Please create > a specific distribution code for messages rammed into newsgroups > behind the backs of their moderators so my machine may reject this > nonsense. Creating a specific distribution code is IDENTICAL to creating a unmoderated group which is EXACTLY what is being requested and has been requested for the last month. Glad to hear you support the idea. Of course whether you choose to reject or except traffic on any group is entirely up to each local site (except to the extent that in order to effectively recieve something you have to find someone else that is broadcasting it). ------- BOB (webber@aramis.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!webber)