Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!dg1v+
From: dg1v+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest
Subject: handling the S.G.P issue
Message-ID: 
Date: Tue, 7-Jul-87 07:33:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: andrew.QUwBmRy00Uw8ADo0Df
Posted: Tue Jul  7 07:33:49 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 13:47:35 EDT
References: <977@mind.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 16
Approved: ailist@stripe.sri.com


While some of the discussion has proven interesting, it is become burdensome
to sort through and rather recursive as arguments start focusing on what
prior arguments meant...

Perhaps a seperate bboard would be more appropriate.  At the very least, Ken
Laws' suggestion that the arguments (and subject lines) be broken into
discrete categories seems to go a long way toward making this disscussion
palatable if not worthwhile.

Mr. Harnad might want to consider proposing a subject taxonomy prefaced with
"SGP".


David Greene
Carnegie Mellon