Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Turbo C and "empty" arrays Message-ID: <6105@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Sun, 12-Jul-87 15:54:08 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6105 Posted: Sun Jul 12 15:54:08 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:49:42 EDT References: <218@picuxa.UUCP> <23127@sun.uucp> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 9 In article <23127@sun.uucp> guy%gorodish@Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes: >... they clearly indicate that an initializer of "{}" is NOT valid, >and that there must be at least one initializer. This is perhaps a good opportunity to remind people that I'm the POC for a special interest group concerning 0-sized data objects in C (which aren't currently legal). If you have good examples that illustrate just why you need 0-sized objects, send them to me and I'll use them as ammunition in support of legalizing them.