FromSubjectReceived
mash@mips.UUCP (John Mashey) Re: XENIX 386 benchmark results Sun, 5-Jul-87 09:35:31 EDT
gwu@vlsi.cs.cmu.edu (George Wu) Re: chewing up mips with graphics Sun, 5-Jul-87 18:38:02 EDT
ram@nucsrl.UUCP (Renu Raman) comp.arch.par-no more Tshirts Sun, 5-Jul-87 21:32:18 EDT
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Re: IEEE floating point modes (interval arithmetic and division) Mon, 6-Jul-87 14:30:22 EDT
earle@jplopto.uucp (Greg Earle (40876)) Letting goodies slip? Tue, 7-Jul-87 01:21:59 EDT
jcz@sas.UUCP (John Carl Zeigler) Re: Applications for consuming processor power Tue, 7-Jul-87 05:02:36 EDT
robison@uiucdcsb.cs.uiuc.edu Re: chewing up mips with graphics [ Tue, 7-Jul-87 06:49:46 EDT
dgh%dgh@Sun.COM (David Hough) Eighth Computer Arithmetic Symposium Wed, 8-Jul-87 01:57:29 EDT
pase@ogcvax.UUCP Re: Parallel Processing - References Thu, 9-Jul-87 03:18:28 EDT
johnw@astroatc.UUCP Re: chewing up mips with graphics [parallel computing] Thu, 9-Jul-87 04:39:32 EDT
dove@savax.UUCP Emulex periperals work on Sun-3's! Fri, 10-Jul-87 01:55:10 EDT
kumar@ut-sally.UUCP Re: Parallel Processing - References Fri, 10-Jul-87 03:27:20 EDT
herndon@umn-cs.UUCP Re: chewing up mips with graphics [parallel computing] Fri, 10-Jul-87 04:11:52 EDT
mash@mips.UUCP (John Mashey) Re: Letting goodies slip? Fri, 10-Jul-87 06:45:59 EDT
mash@mips.UUCP (John Mashey) Kernel build times, esp. on Amdahl Fri, 10-Jul-87 06:47:50 EDT
yoram@cheshire.columbia.edu (Yoram Eisenstadter) Re: Kernel build times, esp. on Amdahl Fri, 10-Jul-87 07:20:52 EDT
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Re: parallel computing Fri, 10-Jul-87 14:40:44 EDT
cik@l.cc.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) Re: IEEE floating point modes Sat, 11-Jul-87 01:45:07 EDT
fnf@mcdsun.UUCP (Fred Fish) Re: Letting goodies slip? Sat, 11-Jul-87 03:05:41 EDT
pase@ogcvax.UUCP (Douglas M. Pase) Re: Is binary decomposition fastest? Sat, 11-Jul-87 03:06:42 EDT
lls@mimsy.UUCP (Lauren L. Smith) Hypercube Survey response Sat, 11-Jul-87 06:28:17 EDT
dwc@homxc.UUCP Re: Kernel build times, esp. on Amdahl Sat, 11-Jul-87 14:57:30 EDT
ram@shukra.UUCP Re: comp.arch.par-no more Tshirts Sat, 11-Jul-87 16:07:53 EDT
ed@plx.UUCP Iocall benchmark results for Plexus P/95!! Sat, 11-Jul-87 17:55:49 EDT
pdg@ihdev.UUCP Re: Kernel build times, esp. on Amdahl Sun, 12-Jul-87 01:04:43 EDT
johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Re: chewing up mips with graphics [parallel computing] Sun, 12-Jul-87 06:47:46 EDT
haynes@ucscc.UCSC.EDU.ucsc.edu (99700000) Re: Kernel build times, esp. on Amdahl Sun, 12-Jul-87 10:47:48 EDT
dinucci@ogcvax.UUCP (David C. DiNucci) Re: parallel computing Mon, 13-Jul-87 00:44:33 EDT
tamir@CS.UCLA.EDU location and dates for the 1988 Architecture Conference Mon, 13-Jul-87 05:08:05 EDT
baden@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (Scott B. Baden) Re: parallel computing Tue, 14-Jul-87 00:47:00 EDT
tamir@CS.UCLA.EDU Re: location and dates for the 1988 Architecture Conference Tue, 14-Jul-87 05:37:07 EDT
robert@pvab.UUCP (Robert Claeson) Re: XENIX 386 benchmark results Tue, 14-Jul-87 06:35:58 EDT
cw@madvax.UUCP (Carl Weidling) An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Wed, 15-Jul-87 01:25:37 EDT
agn@unh.cs.cmu.edu (Andreas Nowatzyk) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Thu, 16-Jul-87 06:16:19 EDT
weaver@prls.UUCP (Michael Gordon Weaver) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Thu, 16-Jul-87 07:06:15 EDT
ps@diab.UUCP (Per-Erik Sundberg) Re: XENIX 386 benchmark results Fri, 17-Jul-87 03:16:41 EDT
howard@cpocd2.UUCP (Howard A. Landman) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Fri, 17-Jul-87 03:59:54 EDT
campbell@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM (Mark Campbell) Re: XENIX 386 benchmark results Fri, 17-Jul-87 06:38:01 EDT
news@santra.UUCP (news) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Fri, 17-Jul-87 06:47:48 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 00:46:40 EDT
lm@cottage.WISC.EDU (Larry McVoy) Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 03:28:59 EDT
Paul@hubcap.UUCP Neural Networks Sat, 18-Jul-87 06:36:38 EDT
bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 07:05:27 EDT
tim@amdcad.AMD.COM (Tim Olson) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 07:21:48 EDT
bct@its63b.ed.ac.uk (B Tompsett) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Sat, 18-Jul-87 07:26:42 EDT
petolino%joe@Sun.COM (Joe Petolino) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 08:04:05 EDT
ps@celerity.UUCP (Pat Shanahan) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 08:11:47 EDT
amos@nsta.UUCP (Amos Shapir) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 08:52:25 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 09:06:09 EDT
rrs@amdahl.amdahl.com (Bob Snead) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 09:07:00 EDT
montnaro@sprite.steinmetz (Skip Montanaro) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 10:08:48 EDT
bobw@wdl1.UUCP (Robert Lee Wilson Jr.) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Sat, 18-Jul-87 11:06:25 EDT
devine@vianet.UUCP (Bob Devine) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 11:25:27 EDT
daveb@geac.UUCP (Dave Brown) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:01:16 EDT
hansen@mips.UUCP (Craig Hansen) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:46:43 EDT
fdr@apollo.uucp (Franklin Reynolds) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:58:14 EDT
christy@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (Peter Christy) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Sat, 18-Jul-87 14:54:12 EDT
dgk@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (David Korn[eww]) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 15:07:27 EDT
lamaster@pioneer.arpa (Hugh LaMaster) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 16:48:04 EDT
stubbs@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Jan Stubbs) IOCALL Results summary Sat, 18-Jul-87 16:49:16 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 18-Jul-87 17:54:20 EDT
aa1@j.cc.purdue.edu (Saul Rosen) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Sat, 18-Jul-87 18:30:27 EDT
jroberts@attvcr.UUCP (John Roberts) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 18:47:07 EDT
corbin@encore.UUCP Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 19:48:17 EDT
corbin@encore.UUCP Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 18-Jul-87 19:48:50 EDT
mash@mips.UUCP (John Mashey) Help! Need some numbers fast on VAXen Sat, 18-Jul-87 20:55:47 EDT
kenm@sci.UUCP (Ken McElvain) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sun, 19-Jul-87 00:44:51 EDT
bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) Shared memory with virtual caching Sun, 19-Jul-87 01:12:32 EDT
aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: b Sun, 19-Jul-87 20:52:31 EDT
pauls@nsc.nsc.com (Paul Sweazey) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sun, 19-Jul-87 21:07:04 EDT
bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sun, 19-Jul-87 22:43:26 EDT
bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Mon, 20-Jul-87 00:35:52 EDT
bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Mon, 20-Jul-87 00:37:54 EDT
dchen%rainier@Sun.COM (David Chenevert) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Mon, 20-Jul-87 03:49:58 EDT
tbray@watsol.UUCP Word and subword sizes (24 bits, floats from hell) Tue, 21-Jul-87 00:56:29 EDT
thomson@uthub.UUCP Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Tue, 21-Jul-87 01:00:46 EDT
haynes@ucscc.UCSC.EDU.ucsc.edu (99700000) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:11:16 EDT
jdg@elmgate.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) What with these Vector's anyways? Tue, 21-Jul-87 05:27:49 EDT
ps@celerity.UUCP (Pat Shanahan) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Tue, 21-Jul-87 05:30:51 EDT
ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Wed, 22-Jul-87 00:40:17 EDT
cw@madvax.UUCP (Carl Weidling) CRT memories, summary of email answers to net, and thanks Wed, 22-Jul-87 01:02:21 EDT
lyndon@ncc.UUCP (Lyndon Nerenberg) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Wed, 22-Jul-87 03:49:25 EDT
mac@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU (Alex Colvin) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Wed, 22-Jul-87 04:25:53 EDT
bruno@ecrcvax.UUCP (Bruno Poterie) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:21:30 EDT
johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: what's the word?) Wed, 22-Jul-87 06:04:46 EDT
johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Wed, 22-Jul-87 06:05:56 EDT
kent@xanth.UUCP (Kent Paul Dolan) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Thu, 23-Jul-87 04:53:29 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Thu, 23-Jul-87 05:35:16 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Thu, 23-Jul-87 05:35:28 EDT
hunt@spar.SPAR.SLB.COM (Neil Hunt) Re: CRT memories: how do you write zero? Thu, 23-Jul-87 05:43:21 EDT
suhler@im4u.UUCP (Paul A. Suhler) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Thu, 23-Jul-87 07:04:50 EDT
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Thu, 23-Jul-87 13:29:55 EDT
seifert@doghouse.gwd.tek.com (Snoopy) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Fri, 24-Jul-87 01:29:57 EDT
jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Fri, 24-Jul-87 01:31:03 EDT
farren@hoptoad.uucp (Mike Farren) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Fri, 24-Jul-87 02:53:36 EDT
aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: b Fri, 24-Jul-87 04:09:26 EDT
bradley@think.COM (Bradley Kuszmaul) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Fri, 24-Jul-87 04:15:41 EDT
baxter@milano.UUCP Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Fri, 24-Jul-87 04:23:41 EDT
perry@apollo.uucp (Jim Perry) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Fri, 24-Jul-87 04:28:11 EDT
lyang%scherzo@Sun.COM (Larry Yang) Re: Power-of-2 (Was : *Why* 8-bit bytes?) Fri, 24-Jul-87 05:54:05 EDT
jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry F Aguirre) Re: Power-of-2 (Was : *Why* 8-bit bytes?) Fri, 24-Jul-87 06:03:33 EDT
heh@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Harlan E. Husmann) VME/SCSI <--> voice products Fri, 24-Jul-87 06:23:54 EDT
martyl@rocksvax.UUCP (Marty Leisner) Re: An old fashioned memory technology, CRT's, how'd they work? Fri, 24-Jul-87 07:08:27 EDT
bobw@wdl1.UUCP (Robert Lee Wilson Jr.) Re: Word and subword sizes (24 bits, floats from hell) Sat, 25-Jul-87 04:05:52 EDT
howard@cpocd2.UUCP (Howard A. Landman) Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits) Sat, 25-Jul-87 04:11:26 EDT
mo@seismo.CSS.GOV (Mike O'Dell) The Power of **2 Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:34:51 EDT
johnl@ima.ISC.COM (John R. Levine) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:31:15 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:42:11 EDT
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 08:47:42 EDT
gene@cooper.UUCP (Gene from EK Enterprises) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:16:21 EDT
aa1@j.cc.purdue.edu (Saul Rosen) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:02:35 EDT
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? (oh really...) Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:09:03 EDT
nelson@ohlone.UUCP (Bron Nelson) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:30:55 EDT
suhler@im4u.UUCP (Paul A. Suhler) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? (oh really...) Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:38:39 EDT
chips@usfvax2.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg) Re: The winner! Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:54:29 EDT
haynes@ucscc.UCSC.EDU.ucsc.edu (99700000) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 12:37:59 EDT
mark@rtech.UUCP (Mark Wittenberg) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 13:54:21 EDT
nelson@ohlone.UUCP (Bron Nelson) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Sat, 25-Jul-87 13:55:35 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: The Power of **2 Sat, 25-Jul-87 14:15:27 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 14:15:37 EDT
mo@seismo.CSS.GOV (Mike O'Dell) Vector machines Sat, 25-Jul-87 14:37:15 EDT
welland@cbmvax.UUCP (Bob Welland) Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Sat, 25-Jul-87 14:42:35 EDT
martin@felix.UUCP (Martin McKendry) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 15:27:41 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Sat, 25-Jul-87 15:51:37 EDT
lindsay@k.cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay) Re: machine word sizes Sat, 25-Jul-87 15:52:14 EDT
mac@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU (Alex Colvin) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 17:54:26 EDT
mac@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU (Alex Colvin) Re: Word and subword sizes (19 bits, ints from h*ll) Sat, 25-Jul-87 17:55:47 EDT
pf@diab.UUCP (Per Fogelstrom) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:06:37 EDT
gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:11:14 EDT
johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? (nuts & bolts) Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:21:40 EDT
unni@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Unni Warrier) Mailing list on modeling/simulation of networks Sat, 25-Jul-87 21:41:55 EDT
roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Re: machine word sizes Sun, 26-Jul-87 01:27:13 EDT
grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Sun, 26-Jul-87 04:46:27 EDT
robison@uiucdcsb.cs.uiuc.edu Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly hav Sun, 26-Jul-87 20:47:31 EDT
peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Why make up names (was Re: Size of SysV "block" (really: byte != 8 bits)) Sun, 26-Jul-87 21:11:20 EDT
lamaster@pioneer.arpa (Hugh LaMaster) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? (oh really...) Sun, 26-Jul-87 22:38:36 EDT
lamaster@pioneer.arpa (Hugh LaMaster) Re: Vector machines Sun, 26-Jul-87 22:41:20 EDT
lamaster@pioneer.arpa (Hugh LaMaster) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Sun, 26-Jul-87 22:42:54 EDT
chuck@amdahl.amdahl.com (Charles Simmons) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Mon, 27-Jul-87 00:43:39 EDT
dgreen@CS.UCLA.EDU Re: The Power of **2 Mon, 27-Jul-87 03:51:26 EDT
fouts@orville (Marty Fouts) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Tue, 28-Jul-87 03:02:31 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Tue, 28-Jul-87 04:20:12 EDT
davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Tue, 28-Jul-87 04:47:59 EDT
thomson@udel.EDU (Richard Thomson) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Tue, 28-Jul-87 06:41:08 EDT
ejbjr@ihlpg.ATT.COM (Branagan) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Tue, 28-Jul-87 06:43:40 EDT
oster@dewey.soe.berkeley.edu (David Phillip Oster) Re: machine word sizes Tue, 28-Jul-87 07:11:55 EDT
pdg@ihdev.ATT.COM (Joe Isuzu) Re: machine word sizes Tue, 28-Jul-87 07:27:43 EDT
rchrd@well.UUCP (Richard Friedman) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Tue, 28-Jul-87 07:32:02 EDT
radford@calgary.UUCP (Radford Neal) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Wed, 29-Jul-87 00:52:58 EDT
littauer@amdahl.amdahl.com (Tom Littauer) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Wed, 29-Jul-87 01:20:10 EDT
rpw3@amdcad.AMD.COM (Rob Warnock) Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes? Wed, 29-Jul-87 04:30:17 EDT
aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP Re: Phys vs Virtual Addr Caches Wed, 29-Jul-87 06:39:10 EDT
lamaster@pioneer.arpa (Hugh LaMaster) Re: What with these Vector's anyways? Thu, 30-Jul-87 00:40:54 EDT
fritz@polecat.caltech.edu (Fritz "3 points" Nordby) Radix-50 and namei() [was Re: machine word sizes] Thu, 30-Jul-87 01:24:32 EDT