Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!UNCAEDU.BITNET!kieffer From: kieffer@UNCAEDU.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: JANET addressing Message-ID: <870717085150.0i7@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA> Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 10:51:49 EDT Article-I.D.: UcEdu.870717085150.0i7 Posted: Fri Jul 17 10:51:49 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Jul-87 07:13:41 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 43 The following is a message I was sending to a JANET address, in fact a reply to the sender. It got bounced locally. I thought I would include the text to illustrate the type of addressing problem we experience with with JANET sites. (this should not start a mail chain in the vms list, please address replies to KIEFFER@UNCAEDU --------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- From: Delivr@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA Subject: Undeliverable Mail To:Comment: reason for return -- Comment: Unknown host or domain Comment: bitnet - %ROUTE-E-NONODE, No such node is defined Comment: the affected addresses follow ... Comment: craa055%uk.ac.kcl.cc.vaxb@ac.uk Start of returned message Date: Fri, 17 Jul 87 08:00:18 MDT From: kieffer @ ucedu.unca.adhocnet.ca Message-Id: <870717080018.0hs@UcEdu.UNCA.AdhocNet.CA> Subject: RE: JANET addresses To: craa055%uk.ac.kcl.cc.vaxb @ ac.uk X-ST-Vmsmail-To: UCEDU::ST%"CRAA055%UK.AC.KCL.CC.VAXB@AC.UK" Subj: JANET addresses We have been using a different addressing scheme to reach JANET sites from Bitnet: user%uk.ac.open.acs.vax@ukacrl for example, and it has worked well for us. Since I did not see this gateway in the original message, I wonder whether I should switch to one of those that are listed? rom kieffer UofCalgary Canada End of returned message