From | Subject | Received |
webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber) |
Re: On denumerability (preliminary)
|
Sun, 5-Jul-87 03:04:30 EDT |
g-rh@cca.CCA.COM (Richard Harter) |
Denumerability, continued
|
Mon, 6-Jul-87 00:41:32 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Tue, 7-Jul-87 00:38:52 EDT |
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) |
the nature of knowledge
|
Tue, 7-Jul-87 03:35:25 EDT |
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) |
Re: The Nature of Knowledge
|
Tue, 7-Jul-87 03:36:33 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: the nature of knowledge
|
Wed, 8-Jul-87 06:36:02 EDT |
cbo@utai.UUCP |
Gerbode's position as Devil's Advocate
|
Wed, 8-Jul-87 07:11:25 EDT |
jfbuss@water.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Thu, 9-Jul-87 06:12:56 EDT |
mps@duke.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Thu, 9-Jul-87 06:40:57 EDT |
jiml@alberta.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Fri, 10-Jul-87 02:42:46 EDT |
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 00:56:21 EDT |
wex@milano.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 07:05:30 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 13:52:47 EDT |
mps@duke.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 16:12:06 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP |
Re: Gerbode's position as Devil's Advocate
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 16:48:05 EDT |
kube@cogsci.berkeley.edu (Paul Kube) |
The nature of belief
|
Sat, 11-Jul-87 18:27:50 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 12:52:50 EDT |
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (R.J.Faichney) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:03:10 EDT |
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) |
Re: Rejoinder to "Anti-empiricism considered useless"
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:07:05 EDT |
andrews@ubc-anchor.uucp (Jamie Andrews) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:28:07 EDT |
andrews@ubc-red.uucp (Jamie Andrews) |
Re: The nature of belief
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:36:02 EDT |
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 16:02:10 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 16:52:57 EDT |
obnoxio@BRAHMS.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP |
Beckett and the nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 12-Jul-87 23:39:24 EDT |
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) |
Re: Beckett and the nature of knowledge
|
Mon, 13-Jul-87 01:14:11 EDT |
tjpak@athena.mit.edu (Tae J Pak) |
Modus Ponens = NIL ?
|
Mon, 13-Jul-87 01:18:54 EDT |
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) |
Re: Scientific Epistemology
|
Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:13:43 EDT |
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:19:48 EDT |
greg@mind.UUCP (Greg Nowak) |
Re: Modus Ponens = NIL ?
|
Wed, 15-Jul-87 04:04:39 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Fri, 17-Jul-87 03:06:48 EDT |
mojo@reed.UUCP (Eddie [Ex-Delivery Boy]) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 04:07:32 EDT |
mojo@reed.UUCP (Eddie [Ex-Delivery Boy]) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 04:09:16 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 06:36:15 EDT |
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 07:29:59 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:14:37 EDT |
lee@mulga.oz (Lee Naish) |
Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities)
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:52:22 EDT |
rsl@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Richard S. Latimer ) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 17:14:43 EDT |
jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 18-Jul-87 17:43:38 EDT |
franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sun, 19-Jul-87 20:39:23 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:24:00 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:24:35 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics)
|
Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:43:34 EDT |
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Tue, 21-Jul-87 05:14:42 EDT |
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) |
Re: QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics)
|
Wed, 22-Jul-87 00:44:01 EDT |
obnoxio@BRAHMS.BERKELEY.EDU (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) |
Comment on Superconductivity
|
Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:11:11 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities)
|
Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:47:22 EDT |
mct@praxis.co.uk (Martyn Thomas) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:48:12 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Comment on Superconductivity
|
Wed, 22-Jul-87 06:48:43 EDT |
litow@uwm-cs.UUCP |
Re: Comment on Superconductivity
|
Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:06:26 EDT |
cliff@rlgvax.UUCP |
Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities)
|
Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:37:51 EDT |
turpin@ut-sally.UUCP |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:43:14 EDT |
garry@utflis.UUCP |
Announcement for artists/technologists.
|
Thu, 23-Jul-87 05:01:44 EDT |
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (R.J.Faichney) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Fri, 24-Jul-87 01:45:01 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
Do philosophers need defending?
|
Fri, 24-Jul-87 06:07:07 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 04:28:59 EDT |
rsl@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Richard S. Latimer ) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 05:34:44 EDT |
hansw@cs.vu.nl (Hans Weigand) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:05:16 EDT |
campbell@utx1.UUCP (Tom Campbell) |
Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:33:58 EDT |
jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:35:18 EDT |
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:35:29 EDT |
franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:24 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:35 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:45 EDT |
matt@oddjob.UChicago.EDU (Matt Crawford) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:27:00 EDT |
turpin@ut-sally.UUCP (Russell Turpin) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 08:03:03 EDT |
gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:08:39 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
Re: Definition of science and of scientific method.
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:27:11 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics)
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:27:36 EDT |
wallace@degas.Berkeley.EDU (David E. Wallace) |
Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities)
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 10:52:18 EDT |
mojo@reed.UUCP (definition) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:22:21 EDT |
jnp@daimi.UUCP (J|rgen N|rgaard) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:06:12 EDT |
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney) |
Re: Do philosophers need defending?
|
Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:07:16 EDT |
myers@tybalt.caltech.edu (Bob Myers) |
Re: Do philosophers need defending?
|
Sun, 26-Jul-87 01:55:22 EDT |
pem@cadnetix.UUCP (Paul Meyer) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Sun, 26-Jul-87 03:03:15 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: Do philosophers need defending?
|
Sun, 26-Jul-87 20:47:18 EDT |
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Sun, 26-Jul-87 20:47:42 EDT |
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) |
Logic and Coercion
|
Sun, 26-Jul-87 21:20:09 EDT |
sigrid@geac.UUCP (Sigrid Grimm) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Tue, 28-Jul-87 01:35:51 EDT |
andy@ecrcvax.UUCP (Andrew Dwelly) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:09:34 EDT |
hansw@cs.vu.nl (Hans Weigand) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:27:28 EDT |
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:40:49 EDT |
ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin) |
Re: Russell's paradox
|
Tue, 28-Jul-87 07:24:24 EDT |
cliff@rlgvax.UUCP (Cliff Joslyn) |
Re: Logic and Coercion
|
Wed, 29-Jul-87 01:33:29 EDT |
robertj@garfield.UUCP |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Wed, 29-Jul-87 02:30:29 EDT |
gcs@mundoe.mu.oz (Geoff Smith) |
Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Wed, 29-Jul-87 05:37:55 EDT |
planting@colby.WISC.EDU ( W. Harry Plantinga) |
Re: The nature of knowledge
|
Wed, 29-Jul-87 05:40:56 EDT |
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) |
Re: Do philosophers need defending?
|
Thu, 30-Jul-87 01:21:50 EDT |
drw@cullvax.UUCP (Dale Worley) |
Russell's set of sets which... paradox
|
Thu, 30-Jul-87 01:57:58 EDT |