Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!ames!ptsfa!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.groups
Subject: Status of the unmoderated comp.sources.misc
Message-ID: <2325@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Mon, 22-Jun-87 18:43:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.2325
Posted: Mon Jun 22 18:43:02 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Jun-87 07:27:47 EDT
References: <687@desint.UUCP> <131@kesmai.COM> <2700@ncoast.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 14
Xref: mnetor comp.sources.d:876 news.groups:1059

Brandon Allbery writes:
> I don't think anyone has to worry about throughput.  If comp.sources.misc
> were a fully moderated newsgroup then there would be cause for worry, but
> as it is there are too many alternate arrangements possible for it to be
> a problem.

I thought comp.sources.misc was being converted to an *unmoderated* group.
I heard this as a rumor from the backbone meeting at Usenix and saw it
on the net as well.  What's the holdup?  It should be as simple as posting
a newgroup message marking it unmoderated, and fixing it in the checkgroups
list.
-- 
{sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4,ucbvax}!hoptoad!gnu	       gnu@ingres.berkeley.edu
Kudos to Stargate for permitting redistribution.   May the Source be with you!