Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!gary From: gary@eddie.MIT.EDU (Gary Samad) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Suggestion for new 'feature' for 1.3 Message-ID: <6250@eddie.MIT.EDU> Date: Mon, 6-Jul-87 17:40:18 EDT Article-I.D.: eddie.6250 Posted: Mon Jul 6 17:40:18 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 7-Jul-87 06:48:56 EDT References: <8706260624.AA20450@cogsci.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: gary@eddie.MIT.EDU (Gary Samad) Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA Lines: 21 In article <8706260624.AA20450@cogsci.berkeley.edu> bryce@COGSCI.BERKELEY.EDU (Bryce Nesbitt) writes: }In article <6192@eddie.MIT.EDU> I typed: }> And to some programs (such as The Microfiche Filer) double-clicks }> are meaningful and if you run one of these double-click-eaters you cannot }> effectively use the program! } }[ That's my goldfish you just stepped on! :-] } }If you are referring to the only double-click program I know of, ClickToFront, }you're wrong. ClickToForont does not eat anything but ~50 bytes of RAM. } }Try ClickToFront with Microfiche, or just with the Workbench tool. Both }use double-clicks, and both integrate smoothly. Sorry, Bryce, I didn't mean to step on your toes but someone (and someone doing a review!) thought that the MFF was buggy because double-click didn't work! Good thing he sent some mail and asked about it before publishing that in his review! He did say he was running ClickToFront. Was it just version 1.0 that ate double-clicks or something? Gary