Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Turbo C and "empty" arrays
Message-ID: <6105@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 12-Jul-87 15:54:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6105
Posted: Sun Jul 12 15:54:08 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:49:42 EDT
References: <218@picuxa.UUCP> <23127@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) )
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <23127@sun.uucp> guy%gorodish@Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
>... they clearly indicate that an initializer of "{}" is NOT valid,
>and that there must be at least one initializer.

This is perhaps a good opportunity to remind people that I'm the POC for
a special interest group concerning 0-sized data objects in C (which
aren't currently legal).  If you have good examples that illustrate
just why you need 0-sized objects, send them to me and I'll use them as
ammunition in support of legalizing them.