Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!sri-unix!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: using varargs function to call another varargs function Message-ID: <6078@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Tue, 7-Jul-87 15:18:14 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6078 Posted: Tue Jul 7 15:18:14 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Jul-87 01:48:57 EDT References: <1332@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> <6048@brl-smoke.ARPA> <685@haddock.UUCP> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) Distribution: world Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 7 In article <685@haddock.UUCP> karl@haddock.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) writes: >Note that ANSI's , which replaces varargs, does not mention a >constraint of "syntactic balancing". I recommended it for based on experience. I don't know if it is provably necessary for some implementations, but since some of them (e.g. OSx) depend on it one might as well be careful ("defensive").