Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!mtuxo!mtune!codas!burl!clyde!feg From: feg@clyde.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: PKARC 3.5 -g option Message-ID: <11121@clyde.ATT.COM> Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 08:10:04 EDT Article-I.D.: clyde.11121 Posted: Fri Jul 17 08:10:04 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jul-87 20:37:37 EDT Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Whippany, NJ Lines: 16 Summary: Progress In article <23599@sun.uucp>, dbercel@sun.uucp (Danielle Bercel, MIS Systems Programming) writes: > Since we are all talking about compatibility between > PKARC and ARC, ................ > [deletions] > Since PKARC seems to be gaining ground as the standard for > many BBSes, it would appear the the original ARC will > have to catch up or see their product go the way of > the products that they originally surmounted. > As for example Computer Innovations ARCH.EXE, which incidentally used the extension .ARC I had many files to be re-archive after after SEA's archive program was released. Since PKARC is downward compatible with SEA, I haven't got that task this time. Forrest Gehrke