Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!cuae2!killer!academ!sob From: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: How do you handle large mailing lists? Message-ID: <166@academ.UUCP> Date: Fri, 24-Jul-87 18:31:18 EDT Article-I.D.: academ.166 Posted: Fri Jul 24 18:31:18 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jul-87 21:18:45 EDT References: <3600@felix.UUCP> <23828@sun.uucp> Reply-To: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber) Distribution: na Organization: ACADEM Computer Systems, Houston, Tx Lines: 20 Xref: mnetor comp.mail.misc:439 comp.unix.wizards:3433 In article <23828@sun.uucp> nowicki%rose@Sun.COM (Bill Nowicki) writes: > We fed bug fixes back to Berkeley, and the 4.3BSD sendmail is much > better than the 4.2BSD one. I am biased, but I > think the SunOS 3.4 (and SunOS 4.0!) sendmails are even better. > > -- WIN The SunOS3.4 sendmail does not support MX records. It also does not support the $[ $] cannonicalization convention. These two things alone make it difficult to use the SunOS 3.4 sendmail on an internet Sun that has to deal with lots of mail. I would hope the SunOS 4.0 sendmail can do this stuff. Stan Barber -- Stan uucp:{killer,rice,hoptoad}!academ!sob Opinions expressed here Olan domain:sob@tmc.edu are ONLY mine & Barber CIS:71565,623 BBS:(713)790-9004 noone else's.