Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brandx.rutgers.edu!webber
From: webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: EndOfSourcesList+AnnouncementOfNetOmbudsman
Message-ID: <275@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 3-Jul-87 00:51:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: brandx.275
Posted: Fri Jul  3 00:51:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 10:14:46 EDT
References: <267@brandx.rutgers.edu> <1610@celtics.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 17
Keywords: solving the moderation bottleneck
Summary: this sounds great

In article <1610@celtics.UUCP>, roger@celtics.UUCP (Roger B.A. Klorese) writes:
> This is the biggest bunch of crap I have ever seen.  Please create
> a specific distribution code for messages rammed into newsgroups
> behind the backs of their moderators so my machine may reject this
> nonsense.

Creating a specific distribution code is IDENTICAL to creating a
unmoderated group which is EXACTLY what is being requested and has
been requested for the last month.  Glad to hear you support the
idea. 

Of course whether you choose to reject or except traffic on any group
is entirely up to each local site (except to the extent that in order
to effectively recieve something you have to find someone else that is
broadcasting it).

------- BOB (webber@aramis.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!webber)