Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ken From: ken@rochester.arpa (Ken Yap) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.misc,sci.lang Subject: Re: "non-compliant" Message-ID: <484@sol.ARPA> Date: Wed, 8-Jul-87 12:25:24 EDT Article-I.D.: sol.484 Posted: Wed Jul 8 12:25:24 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 06:47:00 EDT References: <1634@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Reply-To: ken@rochester.UUCP (Ken Yap) Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY Lines: 4 Xref: mnetor comp.lang.fortran:154 comp.lang.misc:517 sci.lang:1086 Do the standards documents really use the word "compliant"? I thought the usual term was "conforming". Ken