Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!husc6!bloom-beacon!bolasov
From: bolasov@athena.mit.edu (Benjamin I Olasov)
Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.cog-eng
Subject: Re: The symbol grounding problem - please start your own newsgroup
Message-ID: <1064@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 5-Jul-87 14:34:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: bloom-be.1064
Posted: Sun Jul  5 14:34:37 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Jul-87 21:25:46 EDT
References: <764@mind.UUCP> <768@mind.UUCP> <770@mind.UUCP> <6174@diamond.BBN.COM> <1337@watcgl.UUCP> <977@mind.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: bolasov@aphrodite.UUCP (Benjamin I Olasov)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 10
Xref: mnetor comp.ai:628 comp.cog-eng:192

I personally   don't  feel that  it's   Harwood's  place  to   make  a
recommendation  such as the  one he made (rude or  otherwise). If  the
discussion   is germaine to  the  stated purpose(s)  of the  newsgroup
(which it  is),  and is carried on   in an intellectually  responsible
manner (which it certainly has been), why should  it not be allowed to
continue?

Isn't the solution for those who don't  find the topic  interesting to
simply not read the messages bearing  that topic on  the subject line?
After all, any number of discussions can be carried on concur) wr) wr