FromSubjectReceived
webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber) Re: On denumerability (preliminary) Sun, 5-Jul-87 03:04:30 EDT
g-rh@cca.CCA.COM (Richard Harter) Denumerability, continued Mon, 6-Jul-87 00:41:32 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: The nature of knowledge Tue, 7-Jul-87 00:38:52 EDT
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) the nature of knowledge Tue, 7-Jul-87 03:35:25 EDT
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) Re: The Nature of Knowledge Tue, 7-Jul-87 03:36:33 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: the nature of knowledge Wed, 8-Jul-87 06:36:02 EDT
cbo@utai.UUCP Gerbode's position as Devil's Advocate Wed, 8-Jul-87 07:11:25 EDT
jfbuss@water.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Thu, 9-Jul-87 06:12:56 EDT
mps@duke.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Thu, 9-Jul-87 06:40:57 EDT
jiml@alberta.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Fri, 10-Jul-87 02:42:46 EDT
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 11-Jul-87 00:56:21 EDT
wex@milano.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 11-Jul-87 07:05:30 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 11-Jul-87 13:52:47 EDT
mps@duke.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 11-Jul-87 16:12:06 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP Re: Gerbode's position as Devil's Advocate Sat, 11-Jul-87 16:48:05 EDT
kube@cogsci.berkeley.edu (Paul Kube) The nature of belief Sat, 11-Jul-87 18:27:50 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: The nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 12:52:50 EDT
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (R.J.Faichney) Re: The nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:03:10 EDT
eric@snark.UUCP (Eric S. Raymond) Re: Rejoinder to "Anti-empiricism considered useless" Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:07:05 EDT
andrews@ubc-anchor.uucp (Jamie Andrews) Re: The nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:28:07 EDT
andrews@ubc-red.uucp (Jamie Andrews) Re: The nature of belief Sun, 12-Jul-87 14:36:02 EDT
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) Re: The nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 16:02:10 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) The nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 16:52:57 EDT
obnoxio@BRAHMS.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP Beckett and the nature of knowledge Sun, 12-Jul-87 23:39:24 EDT
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) Re: Beckett and the nature of knowledge Mon, 13-Jul-87 01:14:11 EDT
tjpak@athena.mit.edu (Tae J Pak) Modus Ponens = NIL ? Mon, 13-Jul-87 01:18:54 EDT
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) Re: Scientific Epistemology Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:13:43 EDT
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) Re: The nature of knowledge Mon, 13-Jul-87 04:19:48 EDT
greg@mind.UUCP (Greg Nowak) Re: Modus Ponens = NIL ? Wed, 15-Jul-87 04:04:39 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Definition of science and of scientific method. Fri, 17-Jul-87 03:06:48 EDT
mojo@reed.UUCP (Eddie [Ex-Delivery Boy]) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 04:07:32 EDT
mojo@reed.UUCP (Eddie [Ex-Delivery Boy]) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 04:09:16 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 06:36:15 EDT
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 07:29:59 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:14:37 EDT
lee@mulga.oz (Lee Naish) Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities) Sat, 18-Jul-87 13:52:22 EDT
rsl@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Richard S. Latimer ) Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 18-Jul-87 17:14:43 EDT
jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 18-Jul-87 17:43:38 EDT
franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sun, 19-Jul-87 20:39:23 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:24:00 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:24:35 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics) Tue, 21-Jul-87 04:43:34 EDT
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Tue, 21-Jul-87 05:14:42 EDT
laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) Re: QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics) Wed, 22-Jul-87 00:44:01 EDT
obnoxio@BRAHMS.BERKELEY.EDU (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) Comment on Superconductivity Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:11:11 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities) Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:47:22 EDT
mct@praxis.co.uk (Martyn Thomas) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Wed, 22-Jul-87 05:48:12 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Comment on Superconductivity Wed, 22-Jul-87 06:48:43 EDT
litow@uwm-cs.UUCP Re: Comment on Superconductivity Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:06:26 EDT
cliff@rlgvax.UUCP Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities) Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:37:51 EDT
turpin@ut-sally.UUCP Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Thu, 23-Jul-87 01:43:14 EDT
garry@utflis.UUCP Announcement for artists/technologists. Thu, 23-Jul-87 05:01:44 EDT
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (R.J.Faichney) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Fri, 24-Jul-87 01:45:01 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Do philosophers need defending? Fri, 24-Jul-87 06:07:07 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 25-Jul-87 04:28:59 EDT
rsl@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Richard S. Latimer ) Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 25-Jul-87 05:34:44 EDT
hansw@cs.vu.nl (Hans Weigand) Re: The nature of knowledge Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:05:16 EDT
campbell@utx1.UUCP (Tom Campbell) Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:33:58 EDT
jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:35:18 EDT
eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene Miya N.) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 06:35:29 EDT
franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:24 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:35 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:08:45 EDT
matt@oddjob.UChicago.EDU (Matt Crawford) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:27:00 EDT
turpin@ut-sally.UUCP (Russell Turpin) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 08:03:03 EDT
gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:08:39 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Re: Definition of science and of scientific method. Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:27:11 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) QM is not a theory (found in sci.physics) Sat, 25-Jul-87 09:27:36 EDT
wallace@degas.Berkeley.EDU (David E. Wallace) Re: The nature of knowledge (probabilities) Sat, 25-Jul-87 10:52:18 EDT
mojo@reed.UUCP (definition) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:22:21 EDT
jnp@daimi.UUCP (J|rgen N|rgaard) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:06:12 EDT
rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney) Re: Do philosophers need defending? Sat, 25-Jul-87 18:07:16 EDT
myers@tybalt.caltech.edu (Bob Myers) Re: Do philosophers need defending? Sun, 26-Jul-87 01:55:22 EDT
pem@cadnetix.UUCP (Paul Meyer) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Sun, 26-Jul-87 03:03:15 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: Do philosophers need defending? Sun, 26-Jul-87 20:47:18 EDT
sarge@thirdi.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Re: The nature of knowledge Sun, 26-Jul-87 20:47:42 EDT
mps@duke.cs.duke.edu (Michael P. Smith) Logic and Coercion Sun, 26-Jul-87 21:20:09 EDT
sigrid@geac.UUCP (Sigrid Grimm) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Tue, 28-Jul-87 01:35:51 EDT
andy@ecrcvax.UUCP (Andrew Dwelly) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:09:34 EDT
hansw@cs.vu.nl (Hans Weigand) Re: The nature of knowledge Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:27:28 EDT
steve@hubcap.UUCP (Steve ) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Tue, 28-Jul-87 02:40:49 EDT
ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin) Re: Russell's paradox Tue, 28-Jul-87 07:24:24 EDT
cliff@rlgvax.UUCP (Cliff Joslyn) Re: Logic and Coercion Wed, 29-Jul-87 01:33:29 EDT
robertj@garfield.UUCP Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Wed, 29-Jul-87 02:30:29 EDT
gcs@mundoe.mu.oz (Geoff Smith) Re: Russell's set of sets which... paradox Wed, 29-Jul-87 05:37:55 EDT
planting@colby.WISC.EDU ( W. Harry Plantinga) Re: The nature of knowledge Wed, 29-Jul-87 05:40:56 EDT
biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Re: Do philosophers need defending? Thu, 30-Jul-87 01:21:50 EDT
drw@cullvax.UUCP (Dale Worley) Russell's set of sets which... paradox Thu, 30-Jul-87 01:57:58 EDT