Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!vrdxhq!dgis!eplrx7!lad From: lad@eplrx7.UUCP (Lawrence Dziegielewski) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.4bsd,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Cant access disks on second UDA50 Message-ID: <446@eplrx7.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Jul-87 13:10:33 EDT Article-I.D.: eplrx7.446 Posted: Mon Jul 20 13:10:33 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jul-87 01:49:01 EDT References: <6683@dartvax.UUCP> <441@eplrx7.UUCP> <1929@aw.sei.cmu.edu> Organization: E.I. DuPont Co. Engineering Physics Lab Lines: 23 Keywords: unibus uda50 Summary: UDA or KDA Xref: mnetor comp.bugs.4bsd:458 comp.unix.wizards:3332 In article <1929@aw.sei.cmu.edu>, pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Patrick Barron) writes: > In article <441@eplrx7.UUCP> lad@eplrx7.UUCP (Lawrence Dziegielewski) writes: > >I have 2 uda's running on several MicroVaxes, and they all run fine. I > > If you have a MicroVAX, then you *don't* have a UDA-50, which is a UNIBUS > device. The controller used on the Q-Bus is the KDA-50. We are using MSCP controllers that look like uda-50's to our unix. In the config I call 'em uda0 and uda1, not kda (never even heard of a kda...). His config file still could be wrong. I know enough about the subject to know that it may be possible. > It doesn't matter what you call the ra* devices, as far as I know. If you > really wanted to do something silly, you could put ra0, ra2, ra4, and ra6 > It may matter to his flavor of unix. Mine (mt Xinu 4.3) expects the config just as I originally posted it. I hope this fellow posts the fix as soon as he gets it, I'd be interested in finding out what the problem was. Larry D.