Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!ames!sri-spam!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!umd5!irs1!kbrown From: kbrown@irs1.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Turbo C Message-ID: <242@irs1.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-Jul-87 07:02:03 EDT Article-I.D.: irs1.242 Posted: Thu Jul 9 07:02:03 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jul-87 19:37:00 EDT References: <8201@brl-adm.ARPA> <1439@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu> Reply-To: kbrown@irs1.UUCP (Ken Brown) Organization: Data Resources Inc., Washington, DC Lines: 30 In article <1439@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu> shaffer@operations.dccs.upenn.edu.UUCP (Earl Shaffer) writes: >PEOPLE!!! - Hey, am I the only one who is angry that my 1.0 >software is buggy! Worse than that, *I* have to fix it! > >I have not heard any of you saying ".. I cant believe this.." >I called Borland and said "what are you going to do about your >bug problem" and they said ".. we will mail you patch information". > > I am probably going to get flamed for this but I think this is typical of the way Borland operates. First they pre-announced the product as vaporware (and began taking orders!!) several months before the product was ready. I was at a show a week or so after Turbo C was announced, the Borland people didn't even have a copy, beta or otherwise, of the software yet. Some time after that I saw a rather lame excuse that they were giving people who had already placed orders as to why it was taking so long to ship th product. And now that they are finally shipping it is buggy. I am sure that they knew that Microsoft was going to ship QuickC in September and pushed an unfinished product out the door to beat Microsoft. Anyone want to take bets on how many patches Microsoft will have to distribute in the first month after QuickC is shipped? Does anyone know what the latest count from Borland is? As of a couple of days ago I have 1 through 9. ken brown kbrown@irs1