Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!think!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!nwd From: nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel Lawrence) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Structured Techniques From Hell (was: Electronic Arts bashing) Message-ID: <4842@j.cc.purdue.edu> Date: Fri, 24-Jul-87 09:40:35 EDT Article-I.D.: j.4842 Posted: Fri Jul 24 09:40:35 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 17:01:59 EDT References: <1660@cadovax.UUCP> <135@jc3b21.UUCP> Reply-To: nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Daniel Lawrence) Organization: Purdue University Lines: 12 Summary: Just what are we talking about > [A long discussion of "Structered Design"] Please forgive my ignorance in this area, but when we start debating the pros and cons of structured design, perhaps someone could define the term for us. When I program, I believe I do it in a "structured" manner, but is this the structure that you are debating? Daniel Lawrence UUCP: ihnp4!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!nwd ARPA: nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu FIDO: 201/2 The Programmer's Room (317) 742-5533 ATT: (317) 742-5153