Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards,comp.arch
Subject: Re: *Why* do modern machines mostly have 8-bit bytes?
Message-ID: <6782@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jul-87 08:37:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: steinmet.6782
Posted: Thu Jul 23 08:37:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 07:42:11 EDT
References: <142700010@tiger.UUCP> <2792@phri.UUCP> <8315@utzoo.UUCP> <2807@phri.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 21
Xref: mnetor comp.unix.wizards:3378 comp.arch:1670

In article <2807@phri.UUCP> roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) writes:
$ ...  ...
$ 	Anybody for a bit-aligned processor with variable word size (in the
$ same way the pdp-10 had variable byte size)?  You could do "ADD X, Y, I"
$ where X and Y are the operands and I is the number of bits of precision
$ wanted.  I should really mark that with a :-), but I'm partly serious (a
$ small part).
$ -- 
$ Roy Smith, {allegra,cmcl2,philabs}!phri!roy
$ System Administrator, Public Health Research Institute
$ 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016

I believe that the Intel 432 had the ability to address object in this
manner. The NS32xxx family has the ability to do loads and stores to
registers on bit boundaries, using variable length words. I have seen
this in the CPU manual, not used it.

-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {chinet | philabs | sesimo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me