Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!gatech!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!cbosgd!cwruecmp!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: EndOfSourcesList+AnnouncementOfNetOmbudsman
Message-ID: <2849@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-Jul-87 22:43:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: ncoast.2849
Posted: Fri Jul 10 22:43:25 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Jul-87 15:54:40 EDT
References: <267@brandx.rutgers.edu> <1610@celtics.UUCP> <275@brandx.rutgers.edu> <2778@ncoast.UUCP> <287@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.sources.d
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 24
As quoted from <287@brandx.rutgers.edu> by webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber):
+---------------
| was plenty. Before you start talking about procedure, please show me
| when it was voted upon that net.sources and mod.sources would be
| merged and subsequently split into multiple moderated groups as well
| as how you ended up being the moderator of the one that is currently
| closest in goals to the old net.sources. It strikes me that your
| interest in proper procedure is rather new found.
+---------------
I have *that* letter too. Basically, Rick Adams _told_ me that net.sources
was becoming comp.sources.misc and that it WOULD be moderated -- no question,
no place for me to complain. He then _asked_ me whether I would like to be
the moderator of the group.
Tell me, where did you get the idea that *I* chose to make net.sources
moderated? It seems to me that, having run out of real arguments, you're
just lashing out blindly at me for having the temerarity to contradict you.
--
[Copyright 1987 Brandon S. Allbery, all rights reserved] \ ncoast 216 781 6201
[Redistributable only if redistribution is subsequently permitted.] \ 2400 bd.
Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc and comp.binaries.ibm.pc
{{ames,harvard,mit-eddie}!necntc,{well,ihnp4}!hoptoad,cbosgd}!ncoast!allbery
<>