Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!gary
From: gary@eddie.MIT.EDU (Gary Samad)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Suggestion for new 'feature' for 1.3
Message-ID: <6250@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 6-Jul-87 17:40:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: eddie.6250
Posted: Mon Jul  6 17:40:18 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 7-Jul-87 06:48:56 EDT
References: <8706260624.AA20450@cogsci.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: gary@eddie.MIT.EDU (Gary Samad)
Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 21

In article <8706260624.AA20450@cogsci.berkeley.edu> bryce@COGSCI.BERKELEY.EDU (Bryce Nesbitt) writes:
}In article <6192@eddie.MIT.EDU> I typed:
}> And to some programs (such as The Microfiche Filer) double-clicks
}> are meaningful and if you run one of these double-click-eaters you cannot
}> effectively use the program!
}
}[ That's my goldfish you just stepped on! :-]
}
}If you are referring to the only double-click program I know of, ClickToFront,
}you're wrong.  ClickToForont does not eat anything but ~50 bytes of RAM.
}
}Try ClickToFront with Microfiche, or just with the Workbench tool.  Both
}use double-clicks, and both integrate smoothly. 

Sorry, Bryce, I didn't mean to step on your toes but someone (and someone
doing a review!) thought that the MFF was buggy because double-click didn't
work!  Good thing he sent some mail and asked about it before publishing
that in his review!  He did say he was running ClickToFront.  Was it just
version 1.0 that ate double-clicks or something?

	Gary