Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site hoptoad.uucp Path: utzoo!hoptoad!gnu From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) Newsgroups: alt.config Subject: Should sources be in alt.sources? Message-ID: <2492@hoptoad.uucp> Date: Wed, 22-Jul-87 19:43:52 EDT Article-I.D.: hoptoad.2492 Posted: Wed Jul 22 19:43:52 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 01:22:06 EDT References: <2544@husc6.UUCP> <864@dasys1.UUCP> <2211@oliveb.UUCP> Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco Lines: 8 I recommend putting source discussions in comp.sources.d as usual. The only reason alt.sources exists is because comp.sources.misc is moderated. I don't mind a few non-source postings if they are relevant, but it sets a bad example for people who have irrelevant things to say. -- {dasys1,ncoast,well,sun,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu gnu@postgres.berkeley.edu Alt.all: the alternative radio of the Usenet.