Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!mtuxo!mtune!codas!burl!clyde!feg
From: feg@clyde.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: PKARC 3.5 -g option
Message-ID: <11121@clyde.ATT.COM>
Date: Fri, 17-Jul-87 08:10:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: clyde.11121
Posted: Fri Jul 17 08:10:04 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jul-87 20:37:37 EDT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Whippany, NJ
Lines: 16
Summary: Progress

In article <23599@sun.uucp>, dbercel@sun.uucp (Danielle Bercel, MIS Systems Programming) writes:
> Since we are all talking about compatibility between
> PKARC and ARC, ................
>   [deletions] 

> Since PKARC seems to be gaining ground as the standard for
> many BBSes, it would appear the the original ARC will
> have to catch up or see their product go the way of
> the products that they originally surmounted.
> 
      As for example Computer Innovations ARCH.EXE, which incidentally
      used the extension .ARC  I had many files to be re-archive after
      after SEA's archive program was released. Since PKARC is downward
      compatible with SEA, I haven't got that task this time.

      Forrest Gehrke