Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!ames!ptsfa!hoptoad!gnu From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.groups Subject: Status of the unmoderated comp.sources.misc Message-ID: <2325@hoptoad.uucp> Date: Mon, 22-Jun-87 18:43:02 EDT Article-I.D.: hoptoad.2325 Posted: Mon Jun 22 18:43:02 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Jun-87 07:27:47 EDT References: <687@desint.UUCP> <131@kesmai.COM> <2700@ncoast.UUCP> Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco Lines: 14 Xref: mnetor comp.sources.d:876 news.groups:1059 Brandon Allbery writes: > I don't think anyone has to worry about throughput. If comp.sources.misc > were a fully moderated newsgroup then there would be cause for worry, but > as it is there are too many alternate arrangements possible for it to be > a problem. I thought comp.sources.misc was being converted to an *unmoderated* group. I heard this as a rumor from the backbone meeting at Usenix and saw it on the net as well. What's the holdup? It should be as simple as posting a newgroup message marking it unmoderated, and fixing it in the checkgroups list. -- {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4,ucbvax}!hoptoad!gnu gnu@ingres.berkeley.edu Kudos to Stargate for permitting redistribution. May the Source be with you!