Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!well!perry From: perry@well.UUCP (Perry S. Kivolowitz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: LIVE paleontology Message-ID: <3558@well.UUCP> Date: Wed, 15-Jul-87 09:36:43 EDT Article-I.D.: well.3558 Posted: Wed Jul 15 09:36:43 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jul-87 06:45:16 EDT References: <8707110358.AA14188@unisoft.UNISOFT> Reply-To: perry@well.UUCP (Perry S. Kivolowitz) Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA Lines: 24 I have been privy to the CBM side of the Live thing. And the A*Squared side. And after a lot of discussions with A*Squared, I tend to believe the story CBM relayed. This discussion of ``who is to blame'' for lack of Live can be summed up very simply: 1) Assume there was no problem with Live. CBM's best interests would be served by getting the product out. A*Squared's best interests would served by getting the product out. The product is not out. This does not hold together. 2) Assume there were problems with Live. CBM's best interests would be served by not coming out with a flawed product. A*Squared's best interests would be served by blaming CBM keeping their own image intact. Sound familiar? ------- The above is observation and is merely hypothesis.