Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!sri-unix!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: using varargs function to call another varargs function
Message-ID: <6078@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 7-Jul-87 15:18:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6078
Posted: Tue Jul  7 15:18:14 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Jul-87 01:48:57 EDT
References: <1332@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> <6048@brl-smoke.ARPA> <685@haddock.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) )
Distribution: world
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <685@haddock.UUCP> karl@haddock.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) writes:
>Note that ANSI's , which replaces varargs, does not mention a
>constraint of "syntactic balancing".

I recommended it for  based on experience.  I don't know if
it is provably necessary for some implementations, but since some of
them (e.g. OSx) depend on it one might as well be careful ("defensive").