Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!JoanneMorimizu.ES@Xerox.COM From: JoanneMorimizu.ES@Xerox.COM Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Alternate PDP-11 (RSX11M+) C Compilers Message-ID: <8449@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: Fri, 24-Jul-87 11:34:58 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-adm.8449 Posted: Fri Jul 24 11:34:58 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 14:04:09 EDT Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 36 Am forwarding this message.... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: Kenneth S. Carpenter:El Segundo:Xerox Sender: Kenneth S. Carpenter:El Segundo:Xerox Subject: Alternate PDP-11 (RSX11M+) 'C' Compilers Date: 22-July-87 (Wednesday) 16:00:07 PDT To: Joanne Morimizu Answer to: Kenneth S. Carpenter:El Segundo:Xerox, Greg Widener:El Segundo:Xerox In reply to: Kenneth S. Carpenter:El Segundo:Xerox Note: Joanne, Please send this to info-c@brl-tgr.ARPA I am interested in any information (personal testimony or pointer to a publication on the subject) about C compilers for the PDP-11 (RSX11M+). Currently I am using the Whitesmith compiler. While this compiler is good and seems to conform to ANSI it has its drawbacks. I am looking for optimization first (Overall Speed and floating point optimization). i.e., I am looking for a code generator which uses floating point only assembly language and does not convert to double precision. Conforming to ANSI is a secondary requirement. If they support prototyping, that would be sufficient. As long as the company intends to upgrade to ANSI, I would be satisfied. thanks, kc Please direct responses to me and I will post a summary. Arpanet address: KCarpenter.El_Segundo@Xerox.COM phone: 213-333-7394 ----------------------------------------------------------------