Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!think!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!nwd
From: nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel Lawrence)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Structured Techniques From Hell (was: Electronic Arts bashing)
Message-ID: <4842@j.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: Fri, 24-Jul-87 09:40:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: j.4842
Posted: Fri Jul 24 09:40:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 17:01:59 EDT
References: <1660@cadovax.UUCP> <135@jc3b21.UUCP>
Reply-To: nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Daniel Lawrence)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 12
Summary: Just what are we talking about

>	[A long discussion of "Structered Design"]

	Please forgive my ignorance in this area, but when we start
debating the pros and cons of structured design, perhaps someone could
define the term for us.  When I program, I believe I do it in a
"structured" manner, but is this the structure that you are debating?

			Daniel Lawrence
			UUCP:	ihnp4!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!nwd
			ARPA:	nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu
			FIDO:	201/2 The Programmer's Room (317) 742-5533
			ATT:	(317) 742-5153