Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!cetron From: cetron@utah-cs.UUCP (Edward J Cetron) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: DEC error messages (was foo?) Message-ID: <4131@utah-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 31-Dec-86 12:51:51 EST Article-I.D.: utah-cs.4131 Posted: Wed Dec 31 12:51:51 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 31-Dec-86 20:51:18 EST References: <246@polyslo.UUCP> <5426@brl-smoke.ARPA> Reply-To: cetron@utah-cs.UUCP (Edward J Cetron) Organization: Center for Engineering Design, Univ of Utah Lines: 16 In article <973@mtune.UUCP> jhc@mtune.UUCP (Jonathan Clark) writes: > >Absolutely true. DEC do have a sense of humour with their error >messages though - anyone else remember the RSX-11M error IE.NFW? The >error message manual gave it as 'Path lost to partner'. Also true. but the best part was that the error number also matched the error: ie.nfw -69. path lost to partner and I still regularly get this error when the unix machines on the same ethercable as my rsx/vax decnet go nuts..... -ed cetron