Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Re: Request for information on phoneme speech synthesis Message-ID: <1094@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Date: Wed, 10-Dec-86 14:22:17 EST Article-I.D.: cbmvax.1094 Posted: Wed Dec 10 14:22:17 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 14-Dec-86 07:44:48 EST References: <2757@fritz.UUCP> Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 37 In article <854@aicchi.UUCP> dbb@aicchi.UUCP (Burch) writes: > >I am designing a system for a client that will use phoneme synthesis to >communicate with a user. I am looking for references to papers on the >subject. Due to parts count limitations, we will not be able to use >any of the commercial speech synthesis chips. In this system, phonemes >will be stored as sampled A/D patterns, and spliced together in real >time to create speech. Also, if anybody has public domain source code >for such a system, that would be greatly appreciated. Parts count!?!? Exactly what are you using to drive this system. I've found two essentially equivalent phoneme or allonym based speech synthesis systems for the C64 computer in my work. The first of these take the software approach. It requires a microprocessor, some simple kind of sound chip (I know the generally available GI or Yamaha ships work fine), and about 32K-64K or ROM. The program called "SAM" for the C64 does exactly this. A hardware alternative is available in the speech cartridge made by Steve Currah. This device contains a GI speech chip, a PLA, and I believe an 8K ROM. The pure software solution ends up costing about the same as the hardware assisted solution. The GI phonemes replace the soft coded phonemes. You might end up with 1-1/2 extra chips in the hardware solution, but you also end up with much more processor time available for things other than talking. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Haynie {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh "Laws to supress tend to strengthen what they would prohibit. This is the fine point on which all the legal professions of history have based their job security." -Bene Gesserit Coda These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they may be yours too. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~