Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!nbires!hao!noao!hsi!archer From: archer@hsi.UUCP (Yrrag Rehcra) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: autoworks vs. super macroworks Message-ID: <460@hsi.UUCP> Date: Fri, 9-Jan-87 09:29:25 EST Article-I.D.: hsi.460 Posted: Fri Jan 9 09:29:25 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Jan-87 09:35:30 EST References: <870107053826.283786@DOCKMASTER.ARPA> Organization: Health Systems Int., New Haven, CT. Lines: 30 > Can anyone compare and contrast these? Without going into nitty-gritty, I understand The Software Touch's "Autoworks" is superior to Beagle Bros' "MacroWorks" and/or "Super MacroWorks". It offers more features, including mail merge. Forgive the lack of details here, I don't have any supporting documentation here with me to type in to help you. InCider magazine has done reviews of both MacroWorks and Autoworks. Whilst both products are excellent and innovative, besides being very, very useful additions to AppleWorks, InCider are impressed with both but I get the feeling that a couple of the editors give Autoworks the nod, even if its just because of the extra mail merge features. The original posting came at a time when my old VISA card was getting itchy to buy me one of these wonderful products. Although Autoworks is a little bit more expensive (approx $27 versus $18 through mail-order --- see InCider magazine adverts), I'm going to be ordering Autoworks, soon, if not today even!!! (...but first I badly need Copy II+....) I'd like to know if anyone reading this has either product, and what are your opinions? General Disclaimer... my views here do not represent in any way those of InCider magazine, The Software Touch or Beagle Bros., etc, etc. I'm just a careful Apple software consumer like the rest of us! -- Garry Archer Esq. ihnp4!hsi!archer Health Systems International New Haven, CT 06511 USA