Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!baron
From: baron@runx.OZ (Jason Haines)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <531@runx.OZ>
Date: Tue, 23-Dec-86 03:27:05 EST
Article-I.D.: runx.531
Posted: Tue Dec 23 03:27:05 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Dec-86 18:45:28 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp> <907@ur-tut.UUCP> <4939@reed.UUCP> <1986Dec19.114200.23189@utcs.uucp>
Reply-To: baron@runx.OZ (James Tiberius Kirk @ The Mutara Nebula)
Organization: RUNX  Un*x Timeshare. Sydney, Australia.
Lines: 28

ows exactly who's got what ROM, whether 64 or 128K.

I have yet to see one good reason why people with Macs are not getting the
ROM/Drive upgrade. Surely most Mac users want that extra power that the new
ROMs and new 800K drive give them over the vanilla 512K.

I have a question about Icon Editing. Suppose you want to write an Icon
editor which can do the icon->mask process that ResEdit does. Does
anyone have any C code to do it? Or do I resort to the new 128K ROM routines
for QuickDraw - CalcMask,etc.?

TO ALL THOSE PEOPLE WITH PLAIN 512K Macs..........

		G E T    	R E A L ! ! ! !



Well, I bought my ROM/Drive upgrade with my Tax Refund cheque. It cost me $570
(Australian - about US$370), and I am VERY pleased with it!

-------------
I'd say Merry Christmas if I wasn't an Athiest.
So,

	Best Wishes and a Happy New Year