Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!topaz.berkeley.edu!newton2 From: newton2@topaz.berkeley.edu Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: encryption with public keys Message-ID: <2051@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Wed, 24-Dec-86 15:54:58 EST Article-I.D.: jade.2051 Posted: Wed Dec 24 15:54:58 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 25-Dec-86 18:40:16 EST References: <3072@ihuxf.UUCP> <9001@duke.duke.UUCP> <7447@utzoo.UUCP> <230@gaia.UUCP> <2050@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: newton2@topaz.berkeley.edu.UUCP () Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 10 Keywords: proscription, not prescription Er, in my previous posting I inverted the intended meaning: I *meant* to say that Research and its disclosure are not *proscribed* by a valid patent in the same field. What RSA Data Security hopes is *prescribed* is the paying of truckoads of royalties... Doug Maisel 56 Panoramic Way Berkeley, CA 94704 (415) 848-5247