Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!baron From: baron@runx.OZ (Jason Haines) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported? Message-ID: <531@runx.OZ> Date: Tue, 23-Dec-86 03:27:05 EST Article-I.D.: runx.531 Posted: Tue Dec 23 03:27:05 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 24-Dec-86 18:45:28 EST References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp> <907@ur-tut.UUCP> <4939@reed.UUCP> <1986Dec19.114200.23189@utcs.uucp> Reply-To: baron@runx.OZ (James Tiberius Kirk @ The Mutara Nebula) Organization: RUNX Un*x Timeshare. Sydney, Australia. Lines: 28 ows exactly who's got what ROM, whether 64 or 128K. I have yet to see one good reason why people with Macs are not getting the ROM/Drive upgrade. Surely most Mac users want that extra power that the new ROMs and new 800K drive give them over the vanilla 512K. I have a question about Icon Editing. Suppose you want to write an Icon editor which can do the icon->mask process that ResEdit does. Does anyone have any C code to do it? Or do I resort to the new 128K ROM routines for QuickDraw - CalcMask,etc.? TO ALL THOSE PEOPLE WITH PLAIN 512K Macs.......... G E T R E A L ! ! ! !Well, I bought my ROM/Drive upgrade with my Tax Refund cheque. It cost me $570 (Australian - about US$370), and I am VERY pleased with it! ------------- I'd say Merry Christmas if I wasn't an Athiest. So, Best Wishes and a Happy New Year