Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!cit-vax!tybalt.caltech.edu!woody From: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu (William Edward Woody) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported? Message-ID: <1436@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: Tue, 6-Jan-87 14:25:27 EST Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1436 Posted: Tue Jan 6 14:25:27 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Jan-87 22:57:44 EST References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp> <907@ur-tut.UUCP> <4939@reed.UUCP> <531@runx.OZ> <764@uwmacc.UUCP> Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu Reply-To: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (William Edward Woody) Organization: Calfornia Institute of Technology Lines: 20 Summary: Yes. For those of you who are arrogant enough to believe that those of us who'd rather buy food than the new ROMS for our macs are stupid, I have but one thing to say: PHFFFFFFFFFFT! There ain't that many additional routines in the new ROMS, and so it shouldn't be that difficult to support the old ROMS. And you should at least give support of the old ROMS a shot; what the heck, I may just buy your next product instead of the new ROMS when I have the money. It'd be nice to have the new ROMS, but if I have the choice between the old ROMS and useful software, or the new ROMS with no useful software, the choice is easy. I don't want a fancy doorstop. (Of course, I'd rather have both, but I'd get very very hungry very very fast. $300 can feed this starving student very well for a long time.) - William Woody Mac! > ][n && /|\ woody@tybalt.caltech.edu woody@juliet.caltech.edu