Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!clubmac From: clubmac@runx.OZ (Sydney University Macintosh Society) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported? Message-ID: <582@runx.OZ> Date: Fri, 9-Jan-87 01:58:03 EST Article-I.D.: runx.582 Posted: Fri Jan 9 01:58:03 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Jan-87 09:39:18 EST References: <476@runx.OZ> <781@rosevax.UUCP> <945@gould9.UUCP> <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: James Tiberius Kirk @ The Mutara Nebula Organization: RUNX Un*x Timeshare. Sydney, Australia. Lines: 8 In article <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> munson@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Ethan Munson) writes: > >product. I suspect that in three years, many programs will require >the 128K ROMs, if the extra features are really useful. > Three years? Don't you think the 256K ROMs (or even the 1 Meg ROMs) may be necessary for the upmarket Macintosh family software?