Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!mordor!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!cbatt!ukma!sean
From: sean@ukma.ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Compiler wars
Message-ID: <5307@ukma.ms.uky.csnet>
Date: Thu, 11-Dec-86 16:45:13 EST
Article-I.D.: ukma.5307
Posted: Thu Dec 11 16:45:13 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 14-Dec-86 14:58:50 EST
References: <814@ulowell.UUCP> <541@elmgate.UUCP>
Reply-To: sean@ukma.ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey)
Distribution: comp
Organization: The Leaning Tower of Patterson Office @ The Univ. of KY
Lines: 18
Keywords: Manx support Lattice C compilers
Summary: Send MANX some flames.

In article <541@elmgate.UUCP> jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) writes:
>One further note.  Why must I always call a compiler manufacturer to find
>out the latest information?  Why must it always be *my* dime?  In nearly
>one year I've received NOTHING(!!!) from Manx.  I sent my card in.  I
>paid my $500.  Why the heck can't they keep me informed?  A postcard
>would do!

I agree that for $500, the least Manx could so is keep it's customers
informed instead of guessing.  I believe that if you feel the same way,
you should write a letter to Manx and let them know.  Address it to the
president of the company.  You might get results!  At least you can say
that you attempted to let the company know of your grievance.

Sean
-- 
===========================================================================
Sean Casey      UUCP:  cbosgd!ukma!sean           CSNET:  sean@ms.uky.csnet
		ARPA:  ukma!sean@anl-mcs.arpa    BITNET:  sean@UKMA.BITNET