Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!tekfdi!videovax!stever
From: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Can't Compile vt100 v2.4
Message-ID: <4141@videovax.Tek.COM>
Date: Thu, 8-Jan-87 03:25:19 EST
Article-I.D.: videovax.4141
Posted: Thu Jan  8 03:25:19 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Jan-87 21:36:53 EST
References: <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.)
Organization: Tektronix Television Systems, Beaverton, Oregon
Lines: 31
Keywords: FooBar
Summary: Be *sure* you've selected the correct compiler!

In article <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP>, Jeff Wabik (jwabik@umnd-cs.UUCP)
writes:

[ description of awful things that happen when he tries to run vt100 v2.4]

> The same happed when I tried to compile 2.3 a while back, and due
> to lack of similar comments from others, this problem must be 
> at my end.  In short:  HELP!   I do get one warning from the compiler --
> something about NULL being re-defined in vt100.c.  Other than that,
> no worries.  Arrgh.  

The complaint about NULL being redefined leads me to believe you might
be compiling under Lattice with Manx defined.  In vt100.h, there are two
lines that are as follows in the distribution:

        #define    LATTICE      0
        #define    MANX         1

If you are using the Lattice compiler, change these definitions to the
following:

        #define    LATTICE      1
        #define    MANX         0

(If you are indeed using Manx, then of course this change is not for you,
and the problem lies somewhere else. . .)

					Steve Rice

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
{decvax | hplabs | ihnp4 | uw-beaver}!tektronix!videovax!stever