Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!HT.AI.MIT.EDU!hamscher From: hamscher@HT.AI.MIT.EDU (Walter Hamscher) Newsgroups: mod.ai Subject: Proposed: a split of this group Message-ID: <8612011424.AA01280@ht.ai.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 1-Dec-86 09:24:05 EST Article-I.D.: ht.8612011424.AA01280 Posted: Mon Dec 1 09:24:05 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Dec-86 03:26:51 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 6 Approved: ailist@sri-stripe.arpa I empathize with the spirit of the motion. But is it really neccessary to split the list? I think Ken does a really good thing by putting warning labels on the philosophical discussions: they're easy to skip over if you're not interested. As long as he's willing to put the time into doing that, there's no need for a split.