Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!apollo!tbg From: tbg@apollo.uucp (Tom Gross) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: UR/FORTH vs. PC/FORTH Message-ID: <325e4ce8.ae34@apollo.uucp> Date: Wed, 7-Jan-87 17:01:01 EST Article-I.D.: apollo.325e4ce8.ae34 Posted: Wed Jan 7 17:01:01 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 7-Jan-87 23:43:32 EST Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, Mass. Lines: 16 I'm getting a little punchy from writing tms320 code at the moment and I was wondering if anyone reading this happens to know what the difference is between Laboratory Microsytems new UR/Forth and their older PC/Forth (or whatever it's called). Also anyone know of a good Forth interpreter for use with microsoft C or another MS-DOS C compiler? I would like to use a combined C and Forth environment on an IBM PC/AT or clone, for reasons that I cannot go into. Please don't ask why. Basically I would like to talk to an HP impedance analyzer (an HPIB device) with a Forth interpreter, then link the same code, compiled, with code generated from C source. /tom