Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
From: KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Re: Is .2 irrational?
Message-ID: <2336@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 14-Jan-87 12:47:53 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-adm.2336
Posted: Wed Jan 14 12:47:53 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Jan-87 00:43:06 EST
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 16

Date: 14 January 1987, 09:28:14 PST
From: Kevin J. Burnett          x3330                
To:   
Subject: Re: Re: Is .2 irrational?

 writes:
>>  floating point format could
>> be designed which allowed exact representation of all decimal fractions,
>> up to some number of places precision.
>
>Gee, how do you deal with 1/3?  I'm not sure how I do that even on
>a decimal computer.  Perhaps you meant that can handle an exact represntation
>of all fractions of the form INTEGER/(Power of 10)
I would think that 'up to some number of places precision' should have meant
something to you.  The phrase would suggest to me that the author you are
quoting meant that, say, up to 5 decimal places, 1/3 = .33333 .