Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!mordor!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!cbatt!ukma!sean From: sean@ukma.ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Compiler wars Message-ID: <5307@ukma.ms.uky.csnet> Date: Thu, 11-Dec-86 16:45:13 EST Article-I.D.: ukma.5307 Posted: Thu Dec 11 16:45:13 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 14-Dec-86 14:58:50 EST References: <814@ulowell.UUCP> <541@elmgate.UUCP> Reply-To: sean@ukma.ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey) Distribution: comp Organization: The Leaning Tower of Patterson Office @ The Univ. of KY Lines: 18 Keywords: Manx support Lattice C compilers Summary: Send MANX some flames. In article <541@elmgate.UUCP> jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) writes: >One further note. Why must I always call a compiler manufacturer to find >out the latest information? Why must it always be *my* dime? In nearly >one year I've received NOTHING(!!!) from Manx. I sent my card in. I >paid my $500. Why the heck can't they keep me informed? A postcard >would do! I agree that for $500, the least Manx could so is keep it's customers informed instead of guessing. I believe that if you feel the same way, you should write a letter to Manx and let them know. Address it to the president of the company. You might get results! At least you can say that you attempted to let the company know of your grievance. Sean -- =========================================================================== Sean Casey UUCP: cbosgd!ukma!sean CSNET: sean@ms.uky.csnet ARPA: ukma!sean@anl-mcs.arpa BITNET: sean@UKMA.BITNET