Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu From: KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: re: bit-field pointers / arrays Message-ID: <1473@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: Fri, 12-Dec-86 21:23:43 EST Article-I.D.: brl-adm.1473 Posted: Fri Dec 12 21:23:43 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 15-Dec-86 19:35:37 EST Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 21 Date: 12 December 1986, 13:16:05 PST From: Kevin J. Burnett x3330To: Subject: re: bit-field pointers / arrays writes: > Oh, please, here we go again with someone else who wants to redefine >C because he wants to take advantage of very specific features of his >machine/environment! Big deal, so you can do this in a straightforward manner >on your 68020. I'm just thrilled to pieces for you! And what happens when >trying to implement C on a machine which doesn't have your spiffy handy-dandy I must say that I have found all of your responses recently to be extremely rude. Can't you say anything CIVIL when you think that the other person is obviously some lower form of life? Your snide comments detract from whatever arguments you might be making. I think you should think a bit more before posting such garbage to the net again. Just think about who's on the receiving end of your diatribes. - Kevin Burnett SLAC