Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!rca.com!ACTS5%VAXSWD
From: ACTS5%VAXSWD@rca.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: // + vs // c  and trans-warp accelerator
Message-ID: <8701081649.aa07562@SPARK.BRL.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 8-Jan-87 11:41:00 EST
Article-I.D.: SPARK.8701081649.aa07562
Posted: Thu Jan  8 11:41:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 9-Jan-87 00:37:05 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 18

Are there any differences between the  //+ instruction set
and the //c intruction set?

If so, is this why certain (non-graphics) software is beeing offered
for the //c and the //e but not the //+?

The AE accelerator card advertises a "65C02" board.  If the //+ 
and //c boards are different will this card bring it up to speed?

(oh yeah, the AE Transwarp accelerator card)

Will this card give me double high res graphics?

Thanx in advance....


             Craig (wondering if the twentieth century
                    has passed him by) Roll