Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!topaz.berkeley.edu!newton2
From: newton2@topaz.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: encryption with public keys
Message-ID: <2051@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Wed, 24-Dec-86 15:54:58 EST
Article-I.D.: jade.2051
Posted: Wed Dec 24 15:54:58 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Dec-86 18:40:16 EST
References: <3072@ihuxf.UUCP> <9001@duke.duke.UUCP> <7447@utzoo.UUCP> <230@gaia.UUCP> <2050@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: newton2@topaz.berkeley.edu.UUCP ()
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 10
Keywords: proscription, not prescription

Er, in my previous posting I inverted the intended meaning: I *meant*
to say that Research and its disclosure are not *proscribed* by a valid
patent in the same field. What RSA Data Security hopes is *prescribed*
is the paying of truckoads of royalties...

Doug Maisel
56 Panoramic Way
Berkeley, CA 94704

(415) 848-5247