Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!dennis@cod.nosc.arpa@nosc.UUCP
From: dennis@cod.nosc.arpa@nosc.UUCP (Dennis Cottel)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.apollo
Subject: Submission for mod-computers-apollo
Message-ID: <8612042318.AA13512@cod.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 4-Dec-86 18:18:21 EST
Article-I.D.: cod.8612042318.AA13512
Posted: Thu Dec  4 18:18:21 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Dec-86 06:36:49 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21
Approved: apollo@yale-comix.arpa

Path: cod!dennis
From: dennis@cod.UUCP (Dennis Cottel)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.apollo
Subject: Experience with DQC connectors?
Message-ID: <414@cod.UUCP>
Date: 4 Dec 86 23:18:21 GMT
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Lines: 13

What are the world's experiences with the new DQC connectors (standard
equipment on the DN3000s)?  Of the first two DQC receptacle boxes we
installed, one worked fine while the other was sensitive to position
of the connector.  Bending up the little tabs in the box (Ugh!) seemed
to do the trick, but this gives me a bad feeling.

We have more DN3000s coming.  I'm wondering if I should just plan on
ordering the DSUB-to-BNC adapter cable for each DN3000 and forget the
DQC scheme.

	Dennis Cottel  Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA  92152
	(619) 225-2406     dennis@nosc.ARPA      sdcsvax!noscvax!dennis