Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!dayton!rosevax!hogan
From: hogan@rosevax.UUCP (Andy Hogan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <781@rosevax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Dec-86 09:10:22 EST
Article-I.D.: rosevax.781
Posted: Tue Dec 16 09:10:22 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Dec-86 04:08:33 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ>
Organization: Rosemount Inc., Eden Prairie, MN
Lines: 29
Summary: Yes

In article <476@runx.OZ>, baron@runx.OZ (Jason Haines) writes:
> 
> Come on people, how about some discussion to the point of whether
> the ol' 64K ROMs should be supported by developers!
> 
> PLEASE, I need to see some REAL discussion of this subject.
> 
> Thanks, Jason Haines

Yes, the old 64K ROMs should be supported.  I've got 'em, and I
want your Microsoft-killer program.  :-)

I know three other Mac users well enough to know their usage habits.  
We have a usage range of extremely light to
everyday, and none of us have seen a need to upgrade that made the
upgrade(s) worth the money.  I am the closest of the four of us to
upgrading, and I'm waiting for this spring's new machines to decide.

Perhaps it would help if one of the VERY nice people from Apple who
have been contributing to this net could share some estimate of how
many 'old' machines there still are out there.  After all, it's just
(sales of 64K ROM machines) - (sales of upgrades).  Or would this info
be too proprietary?  Maybe they could just say "LOTS" or "Some" or
"not too many...."

-- 
What's a noid?     And why does everyone think I'm two of them?

Andy Hogan   Rosemount, Inc.   Mpls MN