Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
From: KJBSF%SLACVM.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: re: bit-field pointers / arrays
Message-ID: <1473@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 12-Dec-86 21:23:43 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-adm.1473
Posted: Fri Dec 12 21:23:43 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Dec-86 19:35:37 EST
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 21

Date: 12 December 1986, 13:16:05 PST
From: Kevin J. Burnett          x3330                
To:   
Subject: re: bit-field pointers / arrays

 writes:
>    Oh, please, here we go again with someone else who wants to redefine
>C because he wants to take advantage of very specific features of his
>machine/environment!  Big deal, so you can do this in a straightforward manner
>on your 68020.  I'm just thrilled to pieces for you!  And what happens when
>trying to implement C on a machine which doesn't have your spiffy handy-dandy

I must say that I have found all of your responses recently to be extremely
rude.  Can't you say anything CIVIL when you think that the other person is
obviously some lower form of life?  Your snide comments detract from whatever
arguments you might be making.
    I think you should think a bit more before posting such garbage to the net
again.  Just think about who's on the receiving end of your diatribes.

- Kevin Burnett
SLAC