Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!oliveb!sun!cmcmanis From: cmcmanis@sun.uucp (Chuck McManis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Can't Compile vt100 v2.4 Message-ID: <11073@sun.uucp> Date: Wed, 7-Jan-87 19:50:36 EST Article-I.D.: sun.11073 Posted: Wed Jan 7 19:50:36 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 8-Jan-87 02:43:57 EST References: <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Lines: 25 Keywords: FooBar Summary: Details, Details In article <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP>, jwabik@umnd-cs.UUCP (Jeff Wabik) writes: > > It's happening again. I (finally) plucked DBW's vt100 (v2.4) off the > net today, and gave a shot at compiling (much the same as I did with 2.3). > The whole process was uneventful and rather painless, that was, of > course, until I tried to execute. The vt100 screen came up, and it > appeared that the device info from SYS: loaded, but then (depending on > phase of the moon and which version of the OS I tried) I got varying crashes: > [He goes on to describe some crashes etc ...] To Jeff and anyone else out there who gets frustrated and turns to the net for help, please include your system setup if you want to get informed answers. Things that are always useful to know are OS revision, (Alpha, Beta, Gamma or Release and number ie WB1.2R for workbench 1.2 Release version) C compiler and revision, Manx or Lattice, (or Commodore) I can only say that a) I compiled vt100 2.4 using Lattice C V3.10 and it ran fine under WorkBench 1.2 Gamma 1. Before compiling it I edited vt100.h and removed the #define MANX and left in the #define LATTICE and it worked fine. -- --Chuck McManis uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis BIX: cmcmanis ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.