Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!dayton!rosevax!hogan From: hogan@rosevax.UUCP (Andy Hogan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported? Message-ID: <781@rosevax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Dec-86 09:10:22 EST Article-I.D.: rosevax.781 Posted: Tue Dec 16 09:10:22 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 18-Dec-86 04:08:33 EST References: <476@runx.OZ> Organization: Rosemount Inc., Eden Prairie, MN Lines: 29 Summary: Yes In article <476@runx.OZ>, baron@runx.OZ (Jason Haines) writes: > > Come on people, how about some discussion to the point of whether > the ol' 64K ROMs should be supported by developers! > > PLEASE, I need to see some REAL discussion of this subject. > > Thanks, Jason Haines Yes, the old 64K ROMs should be supported. I've got 'em, and I want your Microsoft-killer program. :-) I know three other Mac users well enough to know their usage habits. We have a usage range of extremely light to everyday, and none of us have seen a need to upgrade that made the upgrade(s) worth the money. I am the closest of the four of us to upgrading, and I'm waiting for this spring's new machines to decide. Perhaps it would help if one of the VERY nice people from Apple who have been contributing to this net could share some estimate of how many 'old' machines there still are out there. After all, it's just (sales of 64K ROM machines) - (sales of upgrades). Or would this info be too proprietary? Maybe they could just say "LOTS" or "Some" or "not too many...." -- What's a noid? And why does everyone think I'm two of them? Andy Hogan Rosemount, Inc. Mpls MN