Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!eris!mwm From: mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (Don't have strength to leave) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: New V1.2G1 EMACS Message-ID: <1909@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Thu, 11-Dec-86 22:34:45 EST Article-I.D.: jade.1909 Posted: Thu Dec 11 22:34:45 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 14-Dec-86 19:24:26 EST References: <1105@spice.cs.cmu.edu> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (Don't have strength to leave) Meyer) Distribution: net Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 30 In article <1105@spice.cs.cmu.edu> mjp@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes: >Oh, good lord! How can you call your program microGNUemacs if it >doesn't do C-T the same way real GNU does? Oops. I misspoke myself. You're right, a microGNU had damn well better handle C-t the same way GNU does. And mg1a DOES. I did C-t, and saw that the two characters behind the cursor had been transposed. But of course, the cursor had moved, so..... I'll admit now that mg does not do QUITE what GNU does. It won't handle the case of the cursor being on the first character of a line - it just beeps rather than do something different, though. >And speaking of which, I >hope I never see an Emacs for the Amiga that uses mlisp... How about an elisp (the GNU Emacs LISP)? Designed by a Zeta-LISPer, at a guess. >Does mg1a have some sort of extension language so I can tailor its >behavior to my taste, or do I have to go in and hack the source? Sorry, but no. It's still based on v30. I personally think that putting a LISP-like language underneath any of the micro-emacs's would be a mistake. The lisp/C interface would be at the wrong level. Maybe Gold Hill will do a 68K version of their common lisp, thus giving you GLEmacs, sourced in LISP.