Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!apollo!tbg
From: tbg@apollo.uucp (Tom Gross)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: UR/FORTH vs. PC/FORTH
Message-ID: <325e4ce8.ae34@apollo.uucp>
Date: Wed, 7-Jan-87 17:01:01 EST
Article-I.D.: apollo.325e4ce8.ae34
Posted: Wed Jan  7 17:01:01 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 7-Jan-87 23:43:32 EST
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, Mass.
Lines: 16


    I'm getting a little punchy from writing tms320 code
    at the moment and I was wondering if anyone reading this
    happens to know what the difference is between 
    Laboratory Microsytems new UR/Forth and their older
    PC/Forth (or whatever it's called).

    Also anyone know of a good Forth interpreter for use
    with microsoft C or another MS-DOS C compiler?  I would like
    to use a combined C and Forth environment on an IBM PC/AT
    or clone, for reasons that I cannot go into.  Please don't
    ask why.  Basically I would like to talk to an HP impedance
    analyzer (an HPIB device) with a Forth interpreter, then link
    the same code, compiled, with code generated from C source.

/tom