Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!oliveb!sun!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis@sun.uucp (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Can't Compile vt100 v2.4
Message-ID: <11073@sun.uucp>
Date: Wed, 7-Jan-87 19:50:36 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.11073
Posted: Wed Jan  7 19:50:36 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Jan-87 02:43:57 EST
References: <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 25
Keywords: FooBar
Summary: Details, Details

In article <351@umnd-cs-gw.umnd-cs.UUCP>, jwabik@umnd-cs.UUCP (Jeff Wabik) writes:
> 
> It's happening again.  I (finally) plucked DBW's vt100 (v2.4) off the
> net today, and gave a shot at compiling (much the same as I did with 2.3).
> The whole process was uneventful and rather painless, that was, of 
> course, until I tried to execute.  The vt100 screen came up, and it
> appeared that the device info from SYS: loaded, but then (depending on 
> phase of the moon and which version of the OS I tried) I got varying crashes:
>
[He goes on to describe some crashes etc ...]

To Jeff and anyone else out there who gets frustrated and turns to the
net for help, please include your system setup if you want to get
informed answers. Things that are always useful to know are OS revision,
(Alpha, Beta, Gamma or Release and number ie WB1.2R for workbench 1.2
Release version) C compiler and revision, Manx or Lattice, (or Commodore)

I can only say that a) I compiled vt100 2.4 using Lattice C V3.10 and
it ran fine under WorkBench 1.2 Gamma 1. Before compiling it I edited
vt100.h and removed the #define MANX and left in the #define LATTICE
and it worked fine. 
-- 
--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.