Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!dennis@cod.nosc.arpa@nosc.UUCP From: dennis@cod.nosc.arpa@nosc.UUCP (Dennis Cottel) Newsgroups: mod.computers.apollo Subject: Submission for mod-computers-apollo Message-ID: <8612042318.AA13512@cod.ARPA> Date: Thu, 4-Dec-86 18:18:21 EST Article-I.D.: cod.8612042318.AA13512 Posted: Thu Dec 4 18:18:21 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Dec-86 06:36:49 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 21 Approved: apollo@yale-comix.arpa Path: cod!dennis From: dennis@cod.UUCP (Dennis Cottel) Newsgroups: mod.computers.apollo Subject: Experience with DQC connectors? Message-ID: <414@cod.UUCP> Date: 4 Dec 86 23:18:21 GMT Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego Lines: 13 What are the world's experiences with the new DQC connectors (standard equipment on the DN3000s)? Of the first two DQC receptacle boxes we installed, one worked fine while the other was sensitive to position of the connector. Bending up the little tabs in the box (Ugh!) seemed to do the trick, but this gives me a bad feeling. We have more DN3000s coming. I'm wondering if I should just plan on ordering the DSUB-to-BNC adapter cable for each DN3000 and forget the DQC scheme. Dennis Cottel Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA 92152 (619) 225-2406 dennis@nosc.ARPA sdcsvax!noscvax!dennis