Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!BU-CS.BU.EDU!bzs From: bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: NFS comments Message-ID: <8612201625.AA07829@bu-cs.bu.edu> Date: Sat, 20-Dec-86 11:25:21 EST Article-I.D.: bu-cs.8612201625.AA07829 Posted: Sat Dec 20 11:25:21 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Dec-86 15:35:18 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 12 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa >In the ISO world, you might consider doing FTAM instead. I think it meets >all of your objections, with the notable exception that it's going to be >a while before someone writes an ftam that really performs well... >For those of you interested in looking >at FTAM, I suggest you get a copy of parts 1 and 2 of the FTAM draft >international standard: Are there any working FTAM implementations to look at, performant or not? -Barry Shein, Boston University