Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!HT.AI.MIT.EDU!hamscher
From: hamscher@HT.AI.MIT.EDU (Walter Hamscher)
Newsgroups: mod.ai
Subject: Proposed: a split of this group
Message-ID: <8612011424.AA01280@ht.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 1-Dec-86 09:24:05 EST
Article-I.D.: ht.8612011424.AA01280
Posted: Mon Dec  1 09:24:05 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Dec-86 03:26:51 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 6
Approved: ailist@sri-stripe.arpa

I empathize with the spirit of the motion.  But is it really
neccessary to split the list?  I think Ken does a really good
thing by putting warning labels on the philosophical
discussions: they're easy to skip over if you're not interested.
As long as he's willing to put the time into doing that, there's
no need for a split.