Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!BU-CS.BU.EDU!bzs
From: bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: NFS comments
Message-ID: <8612201625.AA07829@bu-cs.bu.edu>
Date: Sat, 20-Dec-86 11:25:21 EST
Article-I.D.: bu-cs.8612201625.AA07829
Posted: Sat Dec 20 11:25:21 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Dec-86 15:35:18 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa


>In the ISO world, you might consider doing FTAM instead.  I think it meets
>all of your objections, with the notable exception that it's going to be
>a while before someone writes an ftam that really performs well...
>For those of you interested in looking
>at FTAM, I suggest you get a copy of parts 1 and 2 of the FTAM draft
>international standard:

Are there any working FTAM implementations to look at, performant or
not?

	-Barry Shein, Boston University