Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA!mrose
From: mrose@NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA (Marshall Rose)
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: NFS comments
Message-ID: <825.535663218@nrtc-gremlin.arpa>
Date: Tue, 23-Dec-86 12:21:27 EST
Article-I.D.: nrtc-gre.825.535663218
Posted: Tue Dec 23 12:21:27 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Dec-86 22:46:41 EST
References: <8612221720.AA00126@braden.isi.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa


    Well, the obvious answer is to ask "who's doing the agreeing".  I
    know of four such organizations, though there are probably more.

    In Europe, organizations like SPAG have an FTAM profile.  In the
    US, the organization to check with is, of course, the NBS.  John
    Heafner at the NBS spearheads all these kinds of activities, and
    he's the guy you want to ask.  John has an ARPAnet mailbox at the
    NBS, though I don't recall what it is.  In any event, you want the
    notes from the "NBS OSI Implementors' Agreements Workshop".

/mtr