Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA!mrose From: mrose@NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA (Marshall Rose) Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: NFS comments Message-ID: <825.535663218@nrtc-gremlin.arpa> Date: Tue, 23-Dec-86 12:21:27 EST Article-I.D.: nrtc-gre.825.535663218 Posted: Tue Dec 23 12:21:27 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Dec-86 22:46:41 EST References: <8612221720.AA00126@braden.isi.edu> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 12 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa Well, the obvious answer is to ask "who's doing the agreeing". I know of four such organizations, though there are probably more. In Europe, organizations like SPAG have an FTAM profile. In the US, the organization to check with is, of course, the NBS. John Heafner at the NBS spearheads all these kinds of activities, and he's the guy you want to ask. John has an ARPAnet mailbox at the NBS, though I don't recall what it is. In any event, you want the notes from the "NBS OSI Implementors' Agreements Workshop". /mtr