Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!h.cc.purdue.edu!pur-phy!kran!pur-phy!sun.uucp!cmcmanis From: cmcmanis@sun.uucp Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga news (genlock & lots more, *l Message-ID: <-1057800@sun.uucp> Date: Fri, 19-Dec-86 01:16:00 EST Article-I.D.: sun.-1057800 Posted: Fri Dec 19 01:16:00 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Dec-86 04:01:44 EST References: <1272@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> Lines: 26 Nf-ID: #R:zen.BERKELEY.EDU:-127200:sun.uucp:-1057800:000:1441 Nf-From: sun.uucp!cmcmanis Dec 19 01:16:00 1986 In article <2351@ncrcae.UUCP>, wingard@ncrcae.UUCP (Steve Wingard) writes: .> Ahhh... Sorry, George, but about TWO MONTHS AGO Xanth Computers displayed a .> demo VERY SIMILAR in design and execution... a set of four mirrored balls .> moving in an eggbeater pattern around each other over a scrolling "floor" .> with the Atari logo as a pattern and beneath a scrolling "ceiling" with .> a checkerboard pattern. Everything is reflected properly in the balls .> (in fact, the only way you see the scrolling checkerboard is as a reflection .> on the tops of the balls) and the shadows are all drawn properly. It was .> shown at a San Diego Atari computer festival and I'm sure Neil Harris at .> Atari could tell you more about it. .> .> So before you go off making CHEAP SHOTS about who's "faking" whom... I have seen some of the Atari stuff too, (and one on the Ample two gee whiz) And the Amiga beats them on resolution only. That is that the Amiga version has 640 X 400 lines and 4096 colors on the screen. The Atari ones I have seen from Xanth look to be more monochromatic although that could be only the particular one I saw. What has been firmly established is that any graphics hardware can be made to look good when there is lots of memory to shove frames at it. -- --Chuck McManis uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis BIX: cmcmanis ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.