Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!USC-ECL.ARPA!STERNLIGHT
From: STERNLIGHT@USC-ECL.ARPA
Newsgroups: mod.telecom
Subject: Residential Service + BBS Contrary to Tariffs in MA
Message-ID: <8612240406.AA04291@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Mon, 22-Dec-86 21:34:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8612240406.AA04291
Posted: Mon Dec 22 21:34:00 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Dec-86 03:59:15 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 6
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu

I think most of you are missing the point.  I guess the phone company
is arguing that since non-family members leave files or messages on
the BBS for others to receive, the effect is as if the message
leaver (non-family member) made an outgoing call from your phone
to the subsequent message receiver.  Although I think it's pretty
shoddy of the BOC to act this way, I can see their logic.