Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!rca.com!ACTS5%VAXSWD From: ACTS5%VAXSWD@rca.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: // + vs // c and trans-warp accelerator Message-ID: <8701081649.aa07562@SPARK.BRL.ARPA> Date: Thu, 8-Jan-87 11:41:00 EST Article-I.D.: SPARK.8701081649.aa07562 Posted: Thu Jan 8 11:41:00 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 9-Jan-87 00:37:05 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 18 Are there any differences between the //+ instruction set and the //c intruction set? If so, is this why certain (non-graphics) software is beeing offered for the //c and the //e but not the //+? The AE accelerator card advertises a "65C02" board. If the //+ and //c boards are different will this card bring it up to speed? (oh yeah, the AE Transwarp accelerator card) Will this card give me double high res graphics? Thanx in advance.... Craig (wondering if the twentieth century has passed him by) Roll