Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!bath63!pes From: pes@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk (Paul Smee) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Info-Atari16 Digest V86 #37 (LARN, Part 1 of 6) Message-ID: <654@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 11-Dec-86 10:02:46 EST Article-I.D.: bath63.654 Posted: Thu Dec 11 10:02:46 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 15-Dec-86 05:08:12 EST References: <8612082021.AA02001@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <562@orcisi.UUCP> <652@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk> Reply-To: pes@ux63.bath.ac.uk (Paul Smee) Organization: AUCC c/o University of Bath Lines: 16 By the way, it occurred to me after I'd posted my last that it could be misinterpreted. I'd like to make it clear that it's not my intent either to complain, or to flame *anyone*. I realize that a lot of people are doing a lot of (usually unpaid) work to get software onto and around the net. I appreciate it very much, and I wouldn't even dream of wanting to criticise them. All I really want to do is to *suggest*, non-critically, that descriptive blurbs would also be much appreciated; and that I suspect they would in fact cut down the work required by everyone (including the originators) if they could be provided, in a form that could be read before porting and decoding the goodies themselves. Cheers, Paul