Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcs Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ekblaw From: ekblaw@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: Big 10 again Message-ID: <13000054@uiucdcs> Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 11:44:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.13000054 Posted: Fri Nov 8 11:44:00 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 08:38:05 EST References: <1290@decwrl.UUCP> Lines: 15 Nf-ID: #R:decwrl.UUCP:1290:uiucdcs:13000054:000:626 Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!ekblaw Nov 8 10:44:00 1985 Correction, it was the other way around. Washingotn LOST to Michigan in 1980. This fact lowers the number of consecutive Pac 10 victories from 8-9, as I thought before, to only 5. Doesn't look so good now, doesn't it? Robert A. Ekblaw P.S. To those believing the Pac 10 records worse than Big 10 reps due to a more balanced conference, that's wrong. I was going by out-of-conference games, not in-conference. In-conference it is fairly even, with the Pac 10 edging out in total in the last five years. Both conferences are fairly evenly matched internally, due to the teams playing each other for so many years. RAE