Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 5/22/85; site cbosgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!fohl
From: fohl@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Fohl)
Newsgroups: net.med,net.jokes
Subject: Re: A Pro-Smoking Article.
Message-ID: <1608@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 12:01:56 EST
Article-I.D.: cbosgd.1608
Posted: Wed Nov 13 12:01:56 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:20:45 EST
References: <2043@aecom.UUCP> <421@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Oh
Lines: 25
Xref: watmath net.med:2743 net.jokes:14895
Summary: RE: SMoking Article

In article <421@ssc-bee.UUCP>, celeste@ssc-bee.UUCP (Celeste A Strahl) writes:
> > :-)
> > [Some people have complained through both postings and letters that I have been
> > coming down too hard on the health risks of smoking.  Well in the interests of
> > fairness, I'd thought I'd present the following for all you smokers in the
> > audience.] 
> 
> I am a true-blue non-smoker and I do NOT like your articles on smoking.
>  I find some of your
> smoking articles offensive.  
> 
> -celeste

celeste, 

     are you another STella?  Bitching about a smoking article?? Really, 
now.  If you're that hung up about it, I suggest counselling.  I'm not a
smoker (and yes, I am a reformed smoker), but I grant people their right
to at least discuss it.  Becoming ill in the presence of tobacco smoke is
one thing, but reacting to the mere mention can't be physical.

     By the way, keep that sort of thing out of jokes and into jokes.d,
please.

						Fohl