Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccnysci.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!rna!rocky2!cucard!ccnysci!sukenick
From: sukenick@ccnysci.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: literacy
Message-ID: <167@ccnysci.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 31-Oct-85 10:53:18 EST
Article-I.D.: ccnysci.167
Posted: Thu Oct 31 10:53:18 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 14:28:46 EST
References: <747@cyb-eng.UUCP> <9700105@uiucdcs> 
Reply-To: sukenick@ccnysci.UUCP (George )
Organization: City College of New York
Lines: 25
Keywords: you're your two loose to lose too
Summary: When your two loose to's lose then you're too loose too :-)

> ronse@prlb2.UUCP :
>>Scott McEwan :
>
>> The two(2) that really bug me are "to" instead of "too" or "two", and
>> "loose" where "lose" is intended. It seems I see the wrong words much
>				    -----------------------------------
>> more often then I see the right ones used on the net.
>  ---------- ^^^^ ------------------------------------
>
>Indeed. ;-}

Your absolutely correct!   :#)
^^^^
 ^ (Yuck!) :-*

 To those persons guilty of this horrendous crime, the correct usage is :
	"you're" or, even better, " you are ".  	   :-)

(Wow! If my english teacher could see me now! She would be proud!) :-]
		:-) :-)
( Was that two too many smilies to use? :-) )

		-GDS-