Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!sjuvax!lp102911
From: lp102911@sjuvax.UUCP (palena)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: "Hounds of Love" at number sixty-two by now!
Message-ID: <2470@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Oct-85 12:38:38 EST
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.2470
Posted: Mon Oct 28 12:38:38 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 00:16:19 EST
References: <5410@mit-eddie.UUCP> <2304@sjuvax.UUCP> <76@mit-eddie.UUCP> <2389@sjuvax.UUCP> <1946@pyuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: lp102911@sjuvax.UUCP (Larry Palena) (DON't Bother!!!!!!!)
Distribution: net.music
Organization: St. Joseph's University, Phila. PA.
Lines: 46
Keywords: Kate Bush  (What else ?!?!)
Summary: 

In article <1946@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes:
>Has anyone figured out what Palena's problem is?  Did anything he said here
>make any sense?  Copyright lawyers?  "Ahh, art rock"?  Given that Palena's

       ...You know I'm sick of this dude's "Men,net.music is serious business"
       attitude!! Anybody concur on this point?Jesus,I try to inject some humor
       on this beat net and it just flies over the head of every "guru".(Maybe
       because it's usually directed at them).Face it,you take yourself too ser-       ously,and the tone that you and that character at MIT have imposed on 
       this net is revolting....

>opinions on Led Zeppelin as god have been no different from Doug Alan's
>opinions about Kate Bush in the same role, what's the point?  Must he tar

     ...the point is that I don't just post and post and post and post
     Zeppelin pieces to the net.EVERY posting has been in response to
     another one.I respect both Page and Plant and thank them for play-
     ing together,with probably no rehearsal time to speak of,at Live-Aid.
     (Of course the fact that they didn't make a dime for their trouble,
      and it was for a charitable cause,won't be mentioned.)They could've
     used the opportunity to further their new careers,with Plant per-
     forming his new material,and Page playing with "The Firm".Did they?
     No,they gambled and stumbled through some old classics for the ben-
     efit of their old,beloved fans.Is this clear now?? Need I explain it
     any more simply???...

>everything he doesn't like, while whining about how a criticism of a mediocre

     ...what I don't like is the guru-dominated tone and attitude of this
     net.And yes,I will tar that until I die... (applause,applause)

>performance by his "idols" is some sort of vicious attack?  Go back to putting
>your headphones on and listening to Kashmir with the lights out if this is

     ...and you go back to drooling all over your K--- B--- photos...

>what you have to offer.  (I wonder what the group would be like if Palena
>had his way and posted only Zeppelin articles to this newsgroup [instead of
>"only" Bush articles]...)

    ...if everyone would stop dumping on them for no reason I would stop
    posting about them.Does Doug Alan need provocation for posting about
    K--- B---?!?!...

                                      lp102911@sjuvax

{ astrovax | allegra | bpa | burdvax } !sjuvax!lp102911