Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari Subject: Re: Re: AT&T MIGHT PICK UP ST Message-ID: <602@baylor.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 10:53:57 EST Article-I.D.: baylor.602 Posted: Tue Oct 29 10:53:57 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 12:24:25 EST References: <1020@druxo.UUCP> <314@pedsgd.UUCP> Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 12 Xref: linus net.micro.amiga:4457 net.micro.atari:1485 > Second, regarding which machine is best, obviously you & AT&T have > differing opinions :-). That's right. The ST is better for AT&T, since it needs a real operating system badly. The AMIGA doesn't need one since it already has one. There's no point in putting UNIX head-to-head with TRIPOS on the same machine. UNIX is the better O/S, but only by a factor of 2 or so. I hardly think most people would even notice the difference... after all, they seem to consider GEM/CPM nearly as good or better than Intuition, and it's not even in the running. -- -- Peter da Silva -- UUCP: ...!shell!{baylor,graffiti}!peter; MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076