Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!"forwarded for JHD1"Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 12:06:12 EST Article-I.D.: randvax.2777 Posted: Mon Nov 4 12:06:12 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 05:31:18 EST References: <304@watmum.UUCP> <2769@randvax.UUCP> Sender: lseward@randvax.UUCP Reply-To: JHD1 Distribution: net Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica Lines: 20 Gaston Gonnet's recent article on SMP reminds me that a group (self/ ffitch/ Padget) at Bath wrote to CACM on 30th. June complaining about that article, and enclosing a reply for the ACM Forum. Unfortunately, CACM lost that letter. I now have a letter from Ashenhurst (the Forum editor) dated the 14th. October, saying "We will probably wish to publish it, along with one other letter received". Unfortunately, Ashenhurst finds that 100^3-100*100*100 is "somewhat overly technically detailed". We share Gonnet's regret that this article was published. J.H. Davenport Due to a recent massive fowarding failure this article is being reposted. Larry Seward (lseward@rand-unix.arpa) Received: from serc-icf.engineering.cambridge.ac.uk by 44d.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK via Janet with NIFTP id a001155; 30 Oct 85 13:08 GMT Date: Wednesday, 30 October 1985 12:32:56