Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!e-smith From: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.micro.pc Subject: Re: 32032 coprocessor board for IBM/AT Message-ID: <3522@utah-cs.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 21:10:28 EST Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3522 Posted: Sun Nov 3 21:10:28 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 21:12:03 EST References: <384@proper.UUCP> Reply-To: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith) Organization: University of Utah Ada-to-Silicon project Lines: 21 Xref: linus net.micro.16k:362 net.micro.pc:5518 In article <384@proper.UUCP> les@proper.UUCP (Les Kent) writes: ... >These are the boards based on the National 320xx processors. I have >not yet looked at any other types of processors. I would think that >maybe a 68020 would be great but I think it would be hard to fit on >a board that small. ... I am currently designing an MC68020 based product (not an IBM PC coprocessor, I haven't gone completely insane yet), and based on my knowledge of the 68020 can not see any reason why a person would expect it to occupy more board space than a corresponding 32032 based design. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eric L. Smith (801) 581-8100 e-smith@utah-cs.arpa ...decvax!utah-cs!e-smith 3118 Merrill Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the University of Utah, my friends, enemies, computer, or even me. :-) Is this the most magnificant fire you have seen or am I crazy?