Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp 1.2 08/01/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!hp-pcd!bill From: bill@hp-pcd.UUCP (bill) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Re: Jagged Edge spoiler Message-ID: <15700003@hpcvlo.UUCP> Date: Mon, 28-Oct-85 18:26:00 EST Article-I.D.: hpcvlo.15700003 Posted: Mon Oct 28 18:26:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 07:37:06 EST References: <211@vi.UUCP> Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Corvallis, OR Lines: 17 Nf-ID: #R:vi:-21100:hpcvlo:15700003:000:818 Nf-From: hpcvlo!bill Oct 28 15:26:00 1985 Even though he could not be tried again for his wife's murder, do you really think the guy would just sit back knowing that his attorney knew he was guilty and could potentially make public that knowledge. Sure, he wouldn't go to jail for the same crime, but how long would he last in the community if word got out that the trial was a farce and that Jeff Bridges was the killer. The falsely-accused tennis pro was still on the loose, so why not take advantage of it and make the attorney's murder look like just one more of the other guy's crimes? After all, wouldn't the tennis pro feel a little like getting even with her, too? I don't know, though, if she'd make it known that the trial came out wrong. It'd be a terrific blow to her never-lost-a-case-never-been-wrong court career. bill frolik hp-pcd!bill