Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!myers From: myers@uwmacc.UUCP (Latitudinarian Lobster) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Supply-side Economics: the Savings Message-ID: <1671@uwmacc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 14:53:08 EST Article-I.D.: uwmacc.1671 Posted: Fri Nov 8 14:53:08 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 15:15:41 EST References: <756@whuxl.UUCP> <29200244@uiucdcs>, <362@whuts.UUCP> <274@pyuxii.UUCP> Organization: Ken Kopp's Fresh Seafood Tank Lines: 23 > Well, back to form. Sevener, your full of bull. Having gotten' > that out of the way, I would suggest that you take off the > blinders and examine the world around you. In the first place, > your remarks concerning Social Security and Income Security > are mixing apples and oranges. They do not mean the same thing. > Social spending does NOT include social security payments. > Look it up. The figures posted which are under contention WERE mixing apples and oranges, not Mr. Sevener (who, like most bulls, has alot of balls). The figures posted by the original poster for Income Security were actually Income Security + Social Security + Medicare. Look it up. [in a recent *Economic Report of the President*.] > Even the > most staunch liberal historians agree that Hoover was eucherd [euchred] > in this deal. > T. C. Wheeler Wow, I've finally found something that I have in common with el sen~or Wheeler -- euchre! Truly a great game...anybody for a pbm game? J. D. Myers