Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!"forwarded for JHD1" 
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 12:06:12 EST
Article-I.D.: randvax.2777
Posted: Mon Nov  4 12:06:12 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 05:31:18 EST
References: <304@watmum.UUCP> <2769@randvax.UUCP>
Sender: lseward@randvax.UUCP
Reply-To: JHD1 
Distribution: net
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 20

Gaston Gonnet's recent article on SMP reminds me that a
group (self/ ffitch/ Padget) at Bath wrote to CACM on 30th.
June complaining about that article, and enclosing a reply
for the ACM Forum.  Unfortunately, CACM lost that letter.
I now have a letter from Ashenhurst (the Forum editor)
dated the 14th. October, saying "We will probably wish to
publish it, along with one other letter received".
Unfortunately, Ashenhurst finds that 100^3-100*100*100
is "somewhat overly technically detailed".
We share Gonnet's regret that this article was
published.
    J.H. Davenport


Due to a recent massive fowarding failure this article is being reposted.
Larry Seward (lseward@rand-unix.arpa)

Received: from serc-icf.engineering.cambridge.ac.uk by 44d.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
	   via Janet with NIFTP  id a001155; 30 Oct 85 13:08 GMT
Date: Wednesday, 30 October 1985 12:32:56