Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site desteng.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!3comvax!desteng!bfoss From: bfoss@desteng.UUCP (Brad Foss) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: RADAR problems (police honesty) Message-ID: <134@desteng.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 11:54:58 EST Article-I.D.: desteng.134 Posted: Wed Oct 30 11:54:58 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 05:14:04 EST References: <1321@cwruecmp.UUCP> <261@pyuxii.UUCP> Organization: DEST Corporation, Milpitas, CA Lines: 17 > Your problem with speeding makes my heart bleed. If you > had said you were cited for doing 42 in a 35 zone, I might > have had some sympathy. But, 59 in a 35? Come on now, > who do you expect will think you have been victimized? > Did you ever stop to think that they may have got your > number *Before* you decided to slow down? > T. C. Wheeler Please go back and read the original article. He states that knowing that the area is heavily monitored, he was very carefully going *AT* or *BELOW* the limit. This is a discussion of incorrect radar readings, and what recourse one might have in a defence. Being "high tech", radar guns can't be wrong can they? :-) and computers never make misnakes, do they :-) Brad (double nickles 'cause I'm in no hurry) Foss