Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site spar.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!spar!ellis
From: ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools.
Message-ID: <620@spar.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 25-Oct-85 14:55:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: spar.620
Posted: Fri Oct 25 14:55:07 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 07:39:49 EDT
References: <1900@pyuxd.UUCP> <1753@akgua.UUCP> <1953@pyuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis)
Organization: Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, CA
Lines: 25
Xref: linus net.politics:11002 net.religion:7653
Summary: 


>> Gimme a break Rosen.  I didn't twist Goedel and I didn't
>> offer proof you dufus...I said maybe....I said "if we extrapolate.."
>> 
>> Most people recognize this as specualtion...not proof.
>> 
>> Bob Brown {...ihnp4!akgua!rjb}
>
>1.  You most certainly did twist Godel.
>
>2.  Most people don't use a speculation as proof of a belief.  If that's
>	not what you're doing, then what proof DO you have for your beliefs?
>
>3.  Nice tone coming from a (to use Wingate's punctuation technique)
>	"cHRISTIAN'.
> Rich 

     1. Show us, Rich. What is illogical about God as a truth that is not
        verifiable from within a rational, empirical system?
	
     2. You have no proof for your religion, either, Rich. 

     3. You betchum, Red Rider..

-michael