Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!greipa!pesnta!amd!amdcad!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!mangoe
From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Ghostbusting Brevard Childs
Message-ID: <2120@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Nov-85 01:27:28 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2120
Posted: Wed Nov  6 01:27:28 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 05:42:58 EST
References: <2033@pyuxd.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 19

In article <2033@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes:

>> Does anyone else have the same problem with Gary's postings that I do?
>> I can't understand them.  I don't think he and I are writing in the
>> same language. [CHARLI] [not Wingate]

>That's odd, because I find them quite sensible.  Perhaps you simply cannot
>fathom some of his very simple notions because of your particular belief
>structure.  Such as:

>> }Man is not sinful, and therefore doesn't need to be redeemed from sin.
>> }The canon and Christian tradition contradict this premise, and are
>> }therefore not true.

You find them sensible because he starts at the same assumptions and draws
the same conclusion that you do.  Big deal.  By the way: would you care to
explain how it is that you know that Man is not sinful?

Charley Wingate