Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bonnie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!wjh
From: wjh@bonnie.UUCP (Bill Hery)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Slide film vs Color Neg. film
Message-ID: <604@bonnie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 18:12:25 EST
Article-I.D.: bonnie.604
Posted: Fri Nov  1 18:12:25 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 07:32:57 EST
References: <298@tekig4.UUCP> <349@vaxwaller.UUCP> <5746@tekecs.UUCP> <1750@peora.UUCP> <218@astroatc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ
Lines: 14

> >> Reversal color print processes are not as good as negative print
> >> processes. MY OPINION: Don't bother to flame if you disagree!
> >
> >Why would anybody flame you! :-)  After all, it's true...
> >
> 
> 2:  The slide film has better latitude and contrast range.
> 
> 3:  In volume slides are cheaper than prints.
> 
> 4:  When projected on a screen.....
>
The original posting only referred to PRINTS from slides, not the slides themselves.
The point is if your expected final product is to be a print, use print film.