Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!decvax!cca!inmet!mazur
From: mazur@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: More Poor Ol' Bird Dog
Message-ID: <8200042@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 12:54:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.8200042
Posted: Thu Oct 24 12:54:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 19:13:08 EDT
Lines: 32
Nf-ID: #N:inmet:8200042:000:1237
Nf-From: inmet!mazur    Oct 24 12:54:00 1985



>> I am getting pretty sick of reading all the garbage posted...
>>                             Bird Dog
> 
> Actually, I was rather envious that I had not written it. I guess
> that makes me one of the 25%...:-)
>                              Andy Cohill

Feeling somewhat buoyed by STella's frank (and incredibly refreshing)
articles in net.women, I am going to give poor Ol' Bird Dog some
public support from the "minority in the minority".  I too have been
getting a tad tired of some of what has been discussed in net.singles.  
But since I didn't feel too much like contributing, I wasn't going to 
complain.  Then you "caring and thoughtful" people of the net jumped all
over Bird Dog in your effort to show him (in a caring and thoughtful way)
that you couldn't tolerate his "macho bullshit".

I guess his article must have struck a nerve with some people.  
 
> OK, now we get to find out for real. Do women *really* prefer
> "caring and thoughtful" guys to the macho type, or do they
> just *say* they do?  
>			Seth

Are you people "caring and thoughtful", or do you just *say* you are?

Some women prefer guys who can be "caring and thoughtful" with PEOPLE,
as well as TERMINALS.  

Beth Mazur
{ihnp4,ima,harpo}!inmet!mazur