Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!amdcad!jimb
From: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sources
Subject: Re: As long as we are taliking about rmgrouping ...
Message-ID: <5647@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 03:51:50 EST
Article-I.D.: amdcad.5647
Posted: Fri Nov  1 03:51:50 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 06:23:05 EST
References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <136@vcvax1.UUCP> <687@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.news.group:4150 net.sources:3773

In article <687@ucsfcgl.UUCP> arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold) writes:
>
>Not to jump on Eli, but this ain't too cool an idea.  The problem
>
>The only solution is to eliminate net.sources.* in favor of mod.sources.*
>
>		Ken Arnold

The problem with mod.anything has always been that the moderator
'evaluates' the posting.  His criteria will vary according to:

	1) His beliefs.
	2) How much time he has.

What happened to 'the free interchange of ideas'.  Can't you gurus come
up with a mechanism of control which does not depend on your placing
people of your choice in a position of power to control the flow of 
ideas and expressions to the rest of us out here?
-- 
 Jim Budler
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
 (408) 749-5806
 Usenet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amdcad!jimb
 Compuserve:	72415,1200