Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rruxg.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxv!rruxa!rruxe!rruxg!kurt
From: kurt@rruxg.UUCP (K A Gluck)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Net vs. MOD.sources -- I want net.sources
Message-ID: <106@rruxg.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 10-Nov-85 11:13:04 EST
Article-I.D.: rruxg.106
Posted: Sun Nov 10 11:13:04 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Nov-85 05:37:23 EST
References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <391@dsi1.UUCP> <178@milo.UUCP> <478@brl-sem.ARPA>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway, NJ
Lines: 11

I like net.sources.  I like the programs that were listed in a prior
article as not being good for mod.sources.  I have just taken the
code from a terminal locking program and have turned it into a secondary
password shell for logon to server logons.

Please do not delete net.sources.  I read every article in it! (almost
every :-) 


	My vote is to delete all of the non technical unmoderated stuff
first.  then look at net.sources.