Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ekblaw
From: ekblaw@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: Big 10 again
Message-ID: <13000054@uiucdcs>
Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 11:44:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.13000054
Posted: Fri Nov  8 11:44:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 08:38:05 EST
References: <1290@decwrl.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl.UUCP:1290:uiucdcs:13000054:000:626
Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!ekblaw    Nov  8 10:44:00 1985


Correction, it was the other way around.  Washingotn LOST to Michigan in 1980.
This fact lowers the number of consecutive Pac 10 victories from 8-9, as I
thought before, to only 5.  Doesn't look so good now, doesn't it?

Robert A. Ekblaw

P.S.  To those believing the Pac 10 records worse than Big 10 reps due to a
more balanced conference, that's wrong.  I was going by out-of-conference
games, not in-conference.  In-conference it is fairly even, with the Pac 10
edging out in total in the last five years.  Both conferences are fairly
evenly matched internally, due to the teams playing each other for so many
years.

RAE