Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site desint.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!desint!geoff
From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re:  code quality
Message-ID: <132@desint.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-Oct-85 23:07:17 EST
Article-I.D.: desint.132
Posted: Sat Oct 26 23:07:17 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 04:29:11 EST
References: <2012@brl-tgr.ARPA> <8952@ritcv.UUCP> <312@codas.UUCP>
Reply-To: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning)
Organization: SAH Consulting, Manhattan Beach, CA
Lines: 15

In article <312@codas.UUCP> mikel@codas.UUCP (Mikel Manitius) writes:

>Someone somewhere should think of setting up a "credit office" for
>programer information, so that "trojan horse" programers would not
>last very long.

[to avoid misunderstandings, he's talking about incompetents who can't
write C, not people who write "trojan horse" programs]

I just ask interviewees to bring along a code sample.  If they can't
produce one, or I don't like what I see, no job.
-- 

	Geoff Kuenning
	{hplabs,ihnp4}!trwrb!desint!geoff