Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!dennisg
From: dennisg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Dennis Griesser)
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: more about .signatures
Message-ID: <2419@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-Oct-85 00:02:48 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2419
Posted: Sat Oct 26 00:02:48 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Oct-85 03:34:56 EST
References: <462@bdmrrr.UUCP>
Reply-To: dennisg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Dennis Griesser)
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 20

In article <462@bdmrrr.UUCP> gates@bdmrrr.UUCP (Al Gates) wrote about his
graphic signature, now made text and simple.  He ended with a copy of old
and new signatures, old being...
>  /\                                                    /\
> /  \/^\   /\              /\/\/\  /^\    /\          /^/\^\  /\
>Al Gates\^/  \/\          /      \/   \/\/  \/\      /    ^ \/  \^^^\
>BDM Corporation \/\ /^\  /      {seismo,rlgvax}!bdmrrr!gates \    /\ \
>7915 Jones Branch Drive\/          \            \  /          \  /  \ \
>McLean, Virginia  22102 \           \            \/            \/    \ \

I do not remember having seen Al's signature until a few days ago.  At that
time it was appended to a message defending graphic signatures.

Actually, I thought that it was a hoax, intended to poke fun at graphic
signatures.  It didn't have a smily face, but some folks do not know about
them.  Some do not consider them necessary when the message is heavy enough.

That signature was legit!??!?!!
-- 
[This signature file intentionally left blank.]