Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!phillips From: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips) Newsgroups: net.bio,net.origins Subject: Re: Darwin Message-ID: <2063@reed.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 00:10:47 EST Article-I.D.: reed.2063 Posted: Tue Oct 29 00:10:47 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:39:51 EST References: <1185@ames.UUCP> <383@mot.UUCP> Reply-To: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips) Distribution: net Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon Lines: 9 Xref: watmath net.bio:298 net.origins:2531 Summary: >"Oh Yes, and the amount of Lamarckism depends on which edition you read." >Maybe it was edited out by revisionists? Actually, I think that the amount of Lamarckism increased with the editions. Darwin was apparently less secure with the importance of natural selection as time went along. (At least that's what Earnst Mayr says). -Patrick Phillips