Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site felix.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!felix!bytebug From: bytebug@felix.UUCP (Roger L. Long) Newsgroups: net.news,net.news.group Subject: Re: Cleaning up net.sources.mac (mod.sources...) Message-ID: <542@felix.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 11:39:40 EST Article-I.D.: felix.542 Posted: Wed Oct 30 11:39:40 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 01:59:47 EST References: <10674@ucbvax.ARPA> <536@felix.UUCP> <2920@sun.uucp> <660@leadsv.UUCP> <1754@gatech.CSNET> Reply-To: bytebug@felix.UUCP (Roger L. Long) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 17 Xref: watmath net.news:4197 net.news.group:4114 In article <1754@gatech.CSNET> spaf@gatech.UUCP (Gene Spafford) writes: >Postings suggesting and/or discussing the replacement of net.sources.mac >by mod.sources.macintosh (my suggestion for the name) should go on in >net.news.group. I have added that group to the "Newsgroups" line of >this article, and followups will also go there. Net.sources.anything seems ideal to moderate, just so we can clear out the noise of discussion and requests for reposting part x of y when the less-than-perfect net distribution system eats an article. I mentioned in an earlier posting that I was willing to moderate a mod.sources.macintosh group. I've so far received one vote - a yes. If you have an opinion on having such a group, MAIL your vote to me. -- roger long filenet corp trwrb!felix!bytebug