Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuts.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuts!6243tes From: 6243tes@whuts.UUCP (STERKEL) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: Net.flame must die... Message-ID: <356@whuts.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-Nov-85 08:39:55 EST Article-I.D.: whuts.356 Posted: Tue Nov 5 08:39:55 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 04:49:12 EST References: <3482@pur-ee.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 11 > Count this as a vote to kill net.flame. The time to do it has come... > likewise....rmgroup net.flame. I noticed the earlier argument that net.flame was necessary for those who did not want to intellegentlyrationally discuss topics. some- how one of the links in the back bone stripped the ":-)" from this comment. Now that poor person will get tons of flames from people who thinks that he/she was serious. Terry Sterkel