Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ecn-pc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-pc!mdm
From: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.arch
Subject: Re: more on the 386! 
Message-ID: <418@ecn-pc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 9-Nov-85 21:00:56 EST
Article-I.D.: ecn-pc.418
Posted: Sat Nov  9 21:00:56 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Nov-85 06:17:29 EST
References: <8@i80386.UUCP> <491@enmasse.UUCP>
Reply-To: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy)
Organization: Cybotech Product Development Lab
Lines: 32
Xref: watmath net.micro:12651 net.arch:2069

In article <491@enmasse.UUCP> dave@enmasse.UUCP (Dave Brownell) writes:
>Please, folks at Intel, provide only REAL TECHNICAL INFO
>using REAL TECHNICAL PROSE.  Even if you are (justifiably) proud at
>getting your product out the door.
>-- 
>David Brownell
>EnMasse Computer Corp

Dave

A very wise man - Lazurus Long (Time Enough For Love, Robert Heinlien)
once wrote:

	"One mans religion is another man's belly laugh".

To slightly paraphrase, one man's marketing BS is another man's technical
description.  Marketing/management people usually can't help the fact that
they take four times the needed (minimum) time to express their thoughts.  

I think if you would run a survey, you would find that the majority of the net
enjoyed INTEL's description more than your summary.

Big Mac

PS   Hope you've recovered from your INTEL induced illness.