Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cca.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!decvax!cca!bryan
From: bryan@cca.UUCP (Bryan Pendleton)
Newsgroups: net.research
Subject: Re: Newman's Energy Machine 9(but actually about magazines)
Message-ID: <4772@cca.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 07:55:07 EST
Article-I.D.: cca.4772
Posted: Mon Nov  4 07:55:07 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 05:34:56 EST
References: <175@tulane.UUCP> <471@iham1.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: bryan@cca.UUCP (Bryan Pendleton)
Organization: Computer Corp. of America, Cambridge
Lines: 14

I note with interest the comparison of various 'science' magazines. I also
enjoy Science 85 considerably, and find it of great merit. However, it too
seems to have been 'fooled' by Newman's energy machine. In the back of the
most recent issue, in the section called 'ventures', which claims at the
top of the page that (paraphrased) any notes implying scientific merit have
been checked by the Science 85 staff, there appears a small description of
Newman's book with an address for how to order copies. Sigh.

Bryan

P.S. Try American Scientist for a good, readable 'science' magazine.

decvax!cca!bryan