Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-milo.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!gcc-milo!bird
From: bird@gcc-milo.ARPA (Brian Wells)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Legality of Late Abortions (Roe V. Wade)
Message-ID: <385@gcc-milo.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 19:07:02 EST
Article-I.D.: gcc-milo.385
Posted: Thu Nov  7 19:07:02 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 15:39:32 EST
References: <1989@reed.UUCP> <367@cylixd.UUCP> <63@uscvax.UUCP> <64@uscvax.UUCP> <1028@bunker.UUCP> <1984@pyuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: bird@gcc-milo.UUCP (Brian Wells)
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma
Lines: 23
Summary: Response to Rich Rosen

In article <1984@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes:
>(Odd that NO ONE responded to my article about the Arizona Supreme Court, and
>the way their wording and use of the word "viable" makes clear the point of
>demarcation of "lifehood" in terms of being a full fledged human being.  Not
>even Matt Rosenblatt...)
>-- 
>"There!  I've run rings 'round you logically!"
>"Oh, intercourse the penguin!"			Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr

I saw nothing in that article that indicated they were defining the beginning
of life.  It seemed that they were only 'making a judgement' on when the life
was 'meaningful' enough for the law to protect it.
								Brian Wells
James 1:5
______________________________________________________________________________

A further thought on birth control:
	In the previous discussions about birth control, I do not remember
anyone suggesting that people should use more than one method simultaneously.
This was what was taught in my schools when we discussed birth control.  
I would speculate that this could for all practical purposes eliminate
accidental pregnancy.
______________________________________________________________________________