Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Re: (micromotives & macrobehavior) Message-ID: <805@psivax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 00:33:18 EDT Article-I.D.: psivax.805 Posted: Tue Oct 22 00:33:18 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 07:32:33 EDT References: <3476@topaz.UUCP> <28200078@inmet.UUCP> Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA Lines: 21 In article <283@graffiti.UUCP> peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: >> >1916 Famine in China (Capitalist?) >> Imperialistic, not capitalistic(in fact Nationalist China is >> still not a captalistic country) > >I've heard of imperialistic social structures, but this is the first I >have heard of an imperialist economic structure. How does it work? Oh, all right! So I wasn't very precise! Actually what I was trying to imply was a centralized command economy based on government authority, without any clear philosophy. What I have since called a Statist economy. However, it seems I was wrong, and it was actually a variant feudal economy. I was mislead by assuming that Chiang Kai Chek's Nationalist government was already in power at that time. -- Sarima (Stanley Friesen) UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa