Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hplabsc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabsc!brengle From: brengle@hplabsc.UUCP (Tim Brengle) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Once more from the whirlwind Message-ID: <2806@hplabsc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 17:42:48 EST Article-I.D.: hplabsc.2806 Posted: Mon Nov 4 17:42:48 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 05:00:18 EST References: <2015@umcp-cs.UUCP> <802@cybvax0.UUCP> <2029@umcp-cs.UUCP> <806@cybvax0.UUCP> Organization: Hewlett Packard Labs, Palo Alto CA Lines: 22 [Forgive me for jumping into the middle of what seems like a personal feud.] > I think I know the damager god better than you: I think you are misguided > by infatuation. [Mike Huybensz] Conversely, I think that you are misguided by bitterness. Now. What was proved (or even accomplished) by either of those statements? Are either of us convinced? I believe (Charley, please correct me if I am wrong) that Charley was not attempting to express any "moral superiority" with his posting. All he was suggesting is that you (collectively) should be as open to God being good as you ask us to be about his being a damager-god. Come and look. Visit with me and my family and see the happiness that comes totally from our love of the Lord. And THEN judge. As I have tried to express before, How do you explain the loving touch of God that I feel every day? How can He be the evil that you suppose of Him when I *personally* feel His loving touch? Tim Brengle