Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!credmond From: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond) Newsgroups: net.games.chess Subject: Notation Message-ID: <96@watmath.UUCP> Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 22:41:03 EST Article-I.D.: watmath.96 Posted: Wed Nov 13 22:41:03 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 03:06:04 EST References: <359@tekchips.UUCP> <22300011@uiucdcsp> Reply-To: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 17 >> >> 1. P-K4 P-QB4 22.R-R3 B-N2 >> 2. N-KB3 P-Q3 23.B-K3 R-K2 > >This "other" notation is called "inferior." Inferior, all right. All it does is tell you what piece moved to what square, so you can follow the game in your head. Wouldn't want that kind of pandering to human beings now, would we? Might interfere with machine-readability. :-) , I think. Maybe :-( instead. Come on, guys: a lot of people LIKE traditional notation. Me, for one.