Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site caip.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!seismo!caip!jef
From: jef@lbl-rtsg.arpa
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: net.sources.amiga
Message-ID: <434@caip.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 00:27:24 EST
Article-I.D.: caip.434
Posted: Wed Nov 13 00:27:24 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:28:39 EST
Sender: daemon@caip.RUTGERS.EDU
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 19

From: jef@lbl-rtsg.arpa

There are three options:

1) talk in net.micro.amiga and sources in net.micro.amiga;
2) talk in net.micro.amiga and sources in net.sources;
3) talk in met.micro.amiga and sources in net.sources.amiga.

I would just like to point out that if you Usenet folks decide on option 2,
there will be no way to get the sources to us Internet folks.  So please,
either post sources here or create a net.sources.amiga, but DON'T put Amiga
sources in net.sources.

Anyway, what's the big deal about creating a new newsgroup?  It's just another
line in a file.  We'll have the same amount of traffic either way.  Or are
newsgroups implemented in some totally brain-damaged fashion that I don't want
to hear about?
---
Jef