Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hplabsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabsc!brengle
From: brengle@hplabsc.UUCP (Tim Brengle)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Once more from the whirlwind
Message-ID: <2806@hplabsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 17:42:48 EST
Article-I.D.: hplabsc.2806
Posted: Mon Nov  4 17:42:48 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 05:00:18 EST
References: <2015@umcp-cs.UUCP> <802@cybvax0.UUCP> <2029@umcp-cs.UUCP> <806@cybvax0.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett Packard Labs, Palo Alto CA
Lines: 22

[Forgive me for jumping into the middle of what seems like a personal feud.]

> I think I know the damager god better than you: I think you are misguided
> by infatuation. [Mike Huybensz]

Conversely, I think that you are misguided by bitterness.

Now.  What was proved (or even accomplished) by either of those statements?
Are either of us convinced?

I believe (Charley, please correct me if I am wrong) that Charley was not
attempting to express any "moral superiority" with his posting.  All he was
suggesting is that you (collectively) should be as open to God being good as
you ask us to be about his being a damager-god.  Come and look.  Visit with
me and my family and see the happiness that comes totally from our love of the
Lord.  And THEN judge.

As I have tried to express before, How do you explain the loving touch of God
that I feel every day?  How can He be the evil that you suppose of Him when
I *personally* feel His loving touch?

						Tim Brengle