Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mcgill-vision.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse
From: mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP (der Mouse)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.news.group
Subject: Re: A new case for the proposed deletion of net.flame
Message-ID: <325@mcgill-vision.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 00:21:45 EST
Article-I.D.: mcgill-v.325
Posted: Sun Nov  3 00:21:45 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 07:54:22 EST
References: <4494@alice.UUCP>
Organization: McGill University, Montreal
Lines: 20
Xref: linus net.flame:11705 net.news.group:3611

> Last Friday, I suggested that net.flame should be removed.
> To date, I've received 23 letters about the subject, and the
> concensus is 22 DELETE 1 KEEP.

     Sorry for not  responding earlier, but I didn't think anyone  would
take this  person (jj@alice.uucp) seriously.   Obviously, I want to keep
net.flame.

     FLAMERS OF  THE NET, UNITE!   We lost net.bizarre  through inaction
(or so they  keep trying to tell us - remember all  those postings about
"yes we DID cross-post the deletion  discussion to net.bizarre"),  don't
let it happen to net.flame!
-- 
					der Mouse

{ihnp4,decvax,akgua,etc}!utcsri!mcgill-vision!mouse
philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse

Hacker: One responsible for destroying /
Wizard: One responsible for recovering it afterward