Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site pid.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!pid!pwd From: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.news.group Subject: Re: net.sources.amiga - (Lets make it a SOURCE group if we do it) Message-ID: <199@pid.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Nov-85 06:22:04 EST Article-I.D.: pid.199 Posted: Mon Nov 11 06:22:04 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 12-Nov-85 04:22:00 EST References: <45100015@infoswx> Reply-To: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple) Followup-To: net.news.group Organization: P & I Design, Inc. Atlanta Lines: 30 Keywords: amaga source group Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:683 net.news.group:4458 Summary: In article <45100015@infoswx> bees@infoswx.UUCP writes: > >Isn't it time to create a net.sources.amiga and also decide on >a standard for posting binary, ala BINHEX or what ever is best? Why don't we use source so that the code can be changed as well as used. one of the biggest problems with net.sources.mac is that it is in large part not source code but binary. > >I vote yea... please vote, too. This and all responses should >be cross posted here and to net.news.group. If response is >great enough, the group will be created. I must say that I would rather wait a while until more people get there systems and some real source (like the shells that have been talked about) are posted. For now net.micro.amiga is not too full to talk about spliting it in two parts. I included all of the first artical because it was NOT posted to net.news.group followup-to will go to net.news.group only (unless you want to change it) > >Ray Davis >Teknekron Infoswitch, Richardson, TX >infoswx!bees, (214)644-0570 -- Philip Dalrymple akgua!pid!pwd 404/429-8266 (voice)