Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-vax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!mtunh!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!wanttaja From: wanttaja@ssc-vax.UUCP (Ronald J Wanttaja) Newsgroups: net.aviation Subject: Re: Falcon-Piper Crash Over New Jersey Message-ID: <363@ssc-vax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Nov-85 18:12:01 EST Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.363 Posted: Tue Nov 12 18:12:01 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:17:48 EST References: <775@infopro.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA Lines: 25 > This is being written only a few hours after the crash, and only after > hearing television reports plus being familiar with the area. Apparently a > Piper Cherokee hit a Dassault Falcon 50 bizjet nearly headon, both planes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Another little thing we have to be careful about. Admittedly, in a head-on case it may be moot, but stating the situation this way implies the Piper was at fault. One thing that really pisses me off, is this is exactly the way the media presents the happening. The San Diego PSA/172 midair is a classic example of this problem... in fact a recent Popular Mechanics article says: "... a small Cessna rammed a PSA 727..." (not exact quote). How does a 120 kt Cessna ram a 727 at 200+? And actually, in this case, the 172 was hit from behind! Popular Mechanics must think the 172 backed into the airliner! I don't mean to flame the original poster, but am just emphasising the points he made about how we, the General Aviation public, must take care of what little image we have left... Ron Wanttaja (ssc-vax!wanttaja)