Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ritcv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!mjl
From: mjl@ritcv.UUCP (Mike Lutz)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: An observation and a question
Message-ID: <8983@ritcv.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 31-Oct-85 11:23:38 EST
Article-I.D.: ritcv.8983
Posted: Thu Oct 31 11:23:38 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 06:04:52 EST
References: <546@moncol.UUCP> <623@k.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: mjl@ritcv.UUCP (Michael Lutz)
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Lines: 19

In article <623@k.cs.cmu.edu> mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu (Michael Browne) writes:
>If people are really serious about reducing net traffic, net.flame should be
>removed immediately.  If people aren't serious about traffic, then
>net.bizarre should never have been deleted. ...
>
>Vote YES to delete net.flame.

Michael is right, so here's my vote to delete net.flame.  In fact, I vote
to delete all the groups that were on the utzoo hit list.  We'd then
have the bandwidth to support net.internat (or whatever) and many, many
more specialty newsgroups while still significantly reducing overall
traffic.

Join the Henry Spencer Memorial USENET Preservation Society today!  (Memorial
because I'm certain Henry has been incinerated by flame-mail).
-- 
Mike Lutz	Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY
UUCP:		{allegra,seismo}!rochester!ritcv!mjl
CSNET:		mjl%rit@csnet-relay.ARPA