Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekgvs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe
From: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Mr. Udell's hassles with Technics and Stereo Scene
Message-ID: <1281@tekgvs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 20:02:57 EST
Article-I.D.: tekgvs.1281
Posted: Mon Nov  4 20:02:57 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 03:45:32 EST
References: <7651@watrose.UUCP>
Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson)
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 15
Summary: 

In article <7651@watrose.UUCP> rpjday@watrose.UUCP (rpjday) writes:
>
>  It may be unfair to take someone's advice about "don't but brand X
>because I hate it", but Mr. Udell seems to have a very strong, 
>well-researched case here.  Do we or do we not let it affect our
>choice of our next CD player?

Too late - I already *did* use his info and _passed_ on a possible
Technics CD purchase. I'm glad he took the time to let us know
about the problems. That's one of the best things in this newsgroup.
-- 
Keith Ericson  at TekLabs (resident factious factotum)
Tektronix, PO 500, MS 58-383     Beaverton OR 97077    (503)627-6042
uucp:[ucbvax|decvax|ihnp4|(and_many_others)]!tektronix!tekgvs!keithe
CSnet:keithe@tek                      ARPAnet: keithe.tek@rand-relay