Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ptsfa.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!well!ptsfa!jmc From: jmc@ptsfa.UUCP (Jerry Carlin) Newsgroups: net.database Subject: IBM DB2 lacks record locking Message-ID: <941@ptsfa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 17:07:13 EST Article-I.D.: ptsfa.941 Posted: Tue Oct 29 17:07:13 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Oct-85 09:00:06 EST Organization: Pacific Bell, San Francisco Lines: 10 Keywords: DB2 record-locking From Datamation, October 15 issue, page 13: "... Notably absent so far from [DB2] has been an effective record-level locking feature that is critically important for performing simultaneous updates to a single database." And we thought that only Unix DBMS's had problems with record locking :-) -- voice= 415 823-2441 uucp={ihnp4,dual,qantel}!ptsfa!jmc