Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!harpo!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!duke!crm From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin) Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sources Subject: Re: As long as we are taliking about rmgrouping ... Message-ID: <6531@duke.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 13:23:06 EST Article-I.D.: duke.6531 Posted: Fri Nov 1 13:23:06 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Nov-85 01:43:56 EST References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <391@dsi1.UUCP> Reply-To: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin) Organization: Duke University Lines: 16 Xref: watmath net.news.group:4226 net.sources:3797 In article <391@dsi1.UUCP> ron@dsi1.UUCP (Ron Flax) writes: >> I propose that we remove net.sources and only allow the posting of >> sources in mod.sources.* for the following reasons: > >YOU MUST BE NUTS!!!! > >There is certainly more good than bad, and net.sources is one of the >best reasons for even participating in Usenet at all. > I didn't have time to write my own flame, so I'll just second this one: leave net.sources the bloody alone! I get all *sorts* of goodies from it that aren't fancy enough for a moderated group. -- Charlie Martin (...mcnc!duke!crm)