Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mcgill-vision.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse From: mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP (der Mouse) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.news.group Subject: Re: A new case for the proposed deletion of net.flame Message-ID: <325@mcgill-vision.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 00:21:45 EST Article-I.D.: mcgill-v.325 Posted: Sun Nov 3 00:21:45 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 07:54:22 EST References: <4494@alice.UUCP> Organization: McGill University, Montreal Lines: 20 Xref: linus net.flame:11705 net.news.group:3611 > Last Friday, I suggested that net.flame should be removed. > To date, I've received 23 letters about the subject, and the > concensus is 22 DELETE 1 KEEP. Sorry for not responding earlier, but I didn't think anyone would take this person (jj@alice.uucp) seriously. Obviously, I want to keep net.flame. FLAMERS OF THE NET, UNITE! We lost net.bizarre through inaction (or so they keep trying to tell us - remember all those postings about "yes we DID cross-post the deletion discussion to net.bizarre"), don't let it happen to net.flame! -- der Mouse {ihnp4,decvax,akgua,etc}!utcsri!mcgill-vision!mouse philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse Hacker: One responsible for destroying / Wizard: One responsible for recovering it afterward