Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peora.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!peora!jer From: jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.micro.atari,net.micro.mac Subject: Re: DRI agrees to change GEM ; why?? (long) Message-ID: <1751@peora.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 07:58:25 EST Article-I.D.: peora.1751 Posted: Wed Oct 30 07:58:25 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:16:25 EST References: <299@ccivax.UUCP> <3251@nsc.UUCP> <2416@mnetor.UUCP> Organization: Perkin-Elmer SDC, Orlando, Fl. Lines: 16 Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:5749 net.micro.atari:1537 net.micro.mac:3207 > There is no such thing as a "visual copyright" per se. This statement is not true. There is a separate form for filing what the poster called a "visual copyright"; you file for text copyrights on form TX, and for copyrights on audiovisual materials using a separate form (I think it's called form AV). This latter is what is used to copyright video game displays, etc. All this is explained on an instruction sheet that comes with the copyright forms which you get from the Library of Congress to file for copyrights. -- Shyy-Anzr: J. Eric Roskos UUCP: Ofc: ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jer Home: ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jerpc!jer US Mail: MS 795; Perkin-Elmer SDC; 2486 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, FL 32809-7642