Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site desteng.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!3comvax!desteng!bfoss
From: bfoss@desteng.UUCP (Brad Foss)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: RADAR problems (police honesty)
Message-ID: <134@desteng.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 11:54:58 EST
Article-I.D.: desteng.134
Posted: Wed Oct 30 11:54:58 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 05:14:04 EST
References: <1321@cwruecmp.UUCP> <261@pyuxii.UUCP>
Organization: DEST Corporation, Milpitas, CA
Lines: 17

> Your problem with speeding makes my heart bleed.  If you
> had said you were cited for doing 42 in a 35 zone, I might
> have had some sympathy.  But, 59 in a 35?  Come on now,
> who do you expect will think you have been victimized?
> Did you ever stop to think that they may have got your
> number *Before* you decided to slow down?  
> T. C. Wheeler

Please go back and read the original article. He states that knowing that the
area is heavily monitored, he was very carefully going *AT* or *BELOW* the
limit. This is a discussion of incorrect radar readings, and what recourse
one might have in a defence. 

Being "high tech", radar guns can't be wrong can they? :-)
and computers never make misnakes, do they :-)

Brad (double nickles 'cause I'm in no hurry) Foss