Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site lll-crg.ARpA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!booter
From: booter@lll-crg.ARpA (Elaine Richards)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: At Last: Sojourner on Dworkin-M
Message-ID: <971@lll-crg.ARpA>
Date: Tue, 5-Nov-85 22:25:20 EST
Article-I.D.: lll-crg.971
Posted: Tue Nov  5 22:25:20 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 07:04:34 EST
References: <3766@dartvax.UUCP> <31600156@uiucdcs>
Reply-To: booter@lll-crg.UUCP (Elaine Richards)
Organization: Chocoholics Non-Anonymous
Lines: 21

In article <31600156@uiucdcs> mcewan@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU writes:
>
>
Writer gives extensive quote of definition of pornography vis a
vis new laws...

>Does anyone know of any book, movie or work of art containing at least one
>woman that could NOT be considered pornography under this definition?
>
>			Scott McEwan
>			{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan
>
Yes, Scott. Much lovely stuff. Mary Cassat's studies of women and their childrenas well as James MacNeill Whistlers Study in Grey and Black (Whistler's Mother)
Hmm.... there is also the Mona Lisa, the beautiful protraits of the  
Renaissance women in Italy. We also have the alabaster bust of Nefertiti
and a full size statue of the (female) pharoh Hatshepsut. (I saw that one in
NYC - beautiful polished granite). I could go on forever, but I make it a 
policy to keep the memos I write reasonably windfree and short.

E
*****