Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bonnie.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!wjh From: wjh@bonnie.UUCP (Bill Hery) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Slide film vs Color Neg. film Message-ID: <604@bonnie.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 18:12:25 EST Article-I.D.: bonnie.604 Posted: Fri Nov 1 18:12:25 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 07:32:57 EST References: <298@tekig4.UUCP> <349@vaxwaller.UUCP> <5746@tekecs.UUCP> <1750@peora.UUCP> <218@astroatc.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ Lines: 14 > >> Reversal color print processes are not as good as negative print > >> processes. MY OPINION: Don't bother to flame if you disagree! > > > >Why would anybody flame you! :-) After all, it's true... > > > > 2: The slide film has better latitude and contrast range. > > 3: In volume slides are cheaper than prints. > > 4: When projected on a screen..... > The original posting only referred to PRINTS from slides, not the slides themselves. The point is if your expected final product is to be a print, use print film.