Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 / ST 1.0; site saber.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!nsc!saber!msc From: msc@saber.UUCP (Mark Callow) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: A short explanation as to why people object to net.*.mac Message-ID: <1855@saber.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 19:30:44 EST Article-I.D.: saber.1855 Posted: Thu Nov 7 19:30:44 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 06:45:13 EST References: <1322@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: Saber Technology, San Jose, CA Lines: 17 > The large volume of net.*.mac should show how valuable these groups > are to a relatively large part of the net. The volume says nothing about how large a part of the net use the groups. > I don't think that an insignificant number of people could generate this > many postings to net.*.mac. But they can and do. Take a look at the Rick Adam's statistics for the past few months. The mac stuff has been top group (measured by total volume not number of articles). At the same time the top 25 sites and top 25 users lists show that one or two places/people posted most of that volume. -- From the TARDIS of Mark Callow msc@saber.UUCP, sun!saber!msc@decwrl.dec.com ...{decwrl,ucbvax}!sun!saber!msc, ...{amdcad,ihnp4}!saber!msc