Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hou2g!scott From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Colonel'K) Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: The next Star Trek Movie??? Message-ID: <691@hou2g.UUCP> Date: Thu, 31-Oct-85 10:28:03 EST Article-I.D.: hou2g.691 Posted: Thu Oct 31 10:28:03 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 03:42:01 EST References: <649@h-sc1.UUCP> Organization: A Rent-Controlled Gothic Mansion Lines: 43 > I agree about the lawyer, (What was his name and the actor's name?) Don't know the actor, but the character was Samuel P. (or T.) Cogley. > but > shouldn't the crew get off this time? I mean, Scott, Sulu, Uhura, and > Chekov were following the orders of Admiral James Kirk, Chief of > Starfleet Operations, Kirk was never "Chief of Starfleet Operations". That was the guy who forbade Kirk from going to the Genesis planet. Scotty is guilty of sabotage, pure and simple. The rest clearly went along with Kirk freely. (You can't get "busted" for disobeying illegal orders, as far as I know, although there could of course be exceptions.) > McCoy was 'as fruity as a nutcake', and Kirk *did* > capture an enemy starship that could change size! :-) Also, he retailiated > against persons (terrorists?) who murdered Federation citizens, and was > following a request of one of the Federation's most highly respected > Ambassadors, Sarek of Vulcan! No doubt McCoy gets off (either on insanity charges, or as being the victim of a kidnapping). Ambassadors, no matter how respected, do not order Admirals around. Besides, "CofSO" probably knew about Sarek's "request", and you know how he felt about "Vulcan mysticism". > Let's face it, Kirk has done it again! No argument here! :-) > -- > 'Verily, there be no leader as wise as the Vision!' Agreed! Scott J. Berry ihnp4!hou2g!scott