Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peora.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!peora!jer
From: jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.micro.atari,net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: DRI agrees to change GEM ; why?? (long)
Message-ID: <1751@peora.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 07:58:25 EST
Article-I.D.: peora.1751
Posted: Wed Oct 30 07:58:25 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:16:25 EST
References: <299@ccivax.UUCP> <3251@nsc.UUCP> <2416@mnetor.UUCP>
Organization: Perkin-Elmer SDC, Orlando, Fl.
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:5749 net.micro.atari:1537 net.micro.mac:3207

> There is no such thing as a "visual copyright" per se.

This statement is not true.  There is a separate form for filing what
the poster called a "visual copyright"; you file for text copyrights on
form TX, and for copyrights on audiovisual materials using a separate
form (I think it's called form AV).  This latter is what is used to
copyright video game displays, etc.

All this is explained on an instruction sheet that comes with the copyright
forms which you get from the Library of Congress to file for copyrights.
-- 
Shyy-Anzr:  J. Eric Roskos
UUCP: Ofc:  ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jer
     Home:  ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jerpc!jer
  US Mail:  MS 795; Perkin-Elmer SDC;
	    2486 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, FL 32809-7642