Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece
From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Kilts in polite society
Message-ID: <4500041@ccvaxa>
Date: Sun, 27-Oct-85 23:07:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.4500041
Posted: Sun Oct 27 23:07:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 29-Oct-85 01:33:28 EST
References: <4472@alice.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:alice.UUCP:-447200:ccvaxa:4500041:000:807
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece    Oct 27 22:07:00 1985


> It's kind of difficult to get a larger size when you're already wearing
> the largest that most stores carry (you can go to a big men's shop, but
> they have a smaller selection and often charge more). If you're neck is
> disproportionately large, I would imagine that a shirt with the right
> size collar would have sleaves that hang down to your knees.
> Scott McEwan {ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan
----------
Well, the discussion started out talking about dress shirts (the sort
you'd wear with a tie).  Those generally come with separately specified
collar and sleeve sizes.  Let's bring this back to net.women by
noting how unfair it is that women's clothes use single component
sizes while men's generally have two component sizes...


-- 
scott preece
gould/csd - urbana
ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece