Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!decvax!cca!inmet!mazur From: mazur@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: More Poor Ol' Bird Dog Message-ID: <8200042@inmet.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 12:54:00 EDT Article-I.D.: inmet.8200042 Posted: Thu Oct 24 12:54:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 19:13:08 EDT Lines: 32 Nf-ID: #N:inmet:8200042:000:1237 Nf-From: inmet!mazur Oct 24 12:54:00 1985 >> I am getting pretty sick of reading all the garbage posted... >> Bird Dog > > Actually, I was rather envious that I had not written it. I guess > that makes me one of the 25%...:-) > Andy Cohill Feeling somewhat buoyed by STella's frank (and incredibly refreshing) articles in net.women, I am going to give poor Ol' Bird Dog some public support from the "minority in the minority". I too have been getting a tad tired of some of what has been discussed in net.singles. But since I didn't feel too much like contributing, I wasn't going to complain. Then you "caring and thoughtful" people of the net jumped all over Bird Dog in your effort to show him (in a caring and thoughtful way) that you couldn't tolerate his "macho bullshit". I guess his article must have struck a nerve with some people. > OK, now we get to find out for real. Do women *really* prefer > "caring and thoughtful" guys to the macho type, or do they > just *say* they do? > Seth Are you people "caring and thoughtful", or do you just *say* you are? Some women prefer guys who can be "caring and thoughtful" with PEOPLE, as well as TERMINALS. Beth Mazur {ihnp4,ima,harpo}!inmet!mazur