Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuts.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuts!6243tes
From: 6243tes@whuts.UUCP (STERKEL)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Net.flame must die...
Message-ID: <356@whuts.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 5-Nov-85 08:39:55 EST
Article-I.D.: whuts.356
Posted: Tue Nov  5 08:39:55 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 04:49:12 EST
References: <3482@pur-ee.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 11

> Count this as a vote to kill net.flame. The time to do it has come...
> 
  likewise....rmgroup net.flame.

I noticed the earlier argument that net.flame was necessary for those 
who did not want to intellegentlyrationally discuss topics.  some-
how one of the links in the back bone stripped the ":-)" from this
comment.  Now that poor person will get tons of flames from people
who thinks that he/she was serious.
       
                                  Terry Sterkel