Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!dmcanzi
From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Child Pornography
Message-ID: <1823@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 2-Nov-85 01:59:56 EST
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1823
Posted: Sat Nov  2 01:59:56 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 07:01:38 EST
References: <1669@watdcsu.UUCP> <11729@rochester.UUCP> <30973@lanl.ARPA> <2425@sunybcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 19
Summary: 

In article <2425@sunybcs.UUCP> colonel@sunybcs.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman) writes:
>> > How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal?  It would have
>> > to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting.  I would like
>> > to see your reasons for why child porn should be made illegal.
>> 
>> How about "because you can't make child porn without using children
>> and it is already illegal to use children for such purposes" ???
>
>How about animated child pornography?  Or even comic books?  No
>exploitation there.

Nothing wrong with it, then.

>	"I know a sheep-lover who likes to look at clouds.  Do YOU
>	like to look at clouds?"

No, I prefer the sheep. :-)
-- 
David Canzi		"Permission is not freedom."