Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ecn-pc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-pc!mdm From: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy) Newsgroups: net.micro,net.arch Subject: Re: more on the 386!Message-ID: <418@ecn-pc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 9-Nov-85 21:00:56 EST Article-I.D.: ecn-pc.418 Posted: Sat Nov 9 21:00:56 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 11-Nov-85 06:17:29 EST References: <8@i80386.UUCP> <491@enmasse.UUCP> Reply-To: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy) Organization: Cybotech Product Development Lab Lines: 32 Xref: watmath net.micro:12651 net.arch:2069 In article <491@enmasse.UUCP> dave@enmasse.UUCP (Dave Brownell) writes: >Please, folks at Intel, provide only REAL TECHNICAL INFO >using REAL TECHNICAL PROSE. Even if you are (justifiably) proud at >getting your product out the door. >-- >David Brownell >EnMasse Computer Corp Dave A very wise man - Lazurus Long (Time Enough For Love, Robert Heinlien) once wrote: "One mans religion is another man's belly laugh". To slightly paraphrase, one man's marketing BS is another man's technical description. Marketing/management people usually can't help the fact that they take four times the needed (minimum) time to express their thoughts. I think if you would run a survey, you would find that the majority of the net enjoyed INTEL's description more than your summary. Big Mac PS Hope you've recovered from your INTEL induced illness.