Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rruxg.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxv!rruxa!rruxe!rruxg!kurt From: kurt@rruxg.UUCP (K A Gluck) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: Net vs. MOD.sources -- I want net.sources Message-ID: <106@rruxg.UUCP> Date: Sun, 10-Nov-85 11:13:04 EST Article-I.D.: rruxg.106 Posted: Sun Nov 10 11:13:04 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 11-Nov-85 05:37:23 EST References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <391@dsi1.UUCP> <178@milo.UUCP> <478@brl-sem.ARPA> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway, NJ Lines: 11 I like net.sources. I like the programs that were listed in a prior article as not being good for mod.sources. I have just taken the code from a terminal locking program and have turned it into a secondary password shell for logon to server logons. Please do not delete net.sources. I read every article in it! (almost every :-) My vote is to delete all of the non technical unmoderated stuff first. then look at net.sources.