Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!dennisg From: dennisg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Dennis Griesser) Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: more about .signatures Message-ID: <2419@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Date: Sat, 26-Oct-85 00:02:48 EST Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2419 Posted: Sat Oct 26 00:02:48 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 28-Oct-85 03:34:56 EST References: <462@bdmrrr.UUCP> Reply-To: dennisg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Dennis Griesser) Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica Lines: 20 In article <462@bdmrrr.UUCP> gates@bdmrrr.UUCP (Al Gates) wrote about his graphic signature, now made text and simple. He ended with a copy of old and new signatures, old being... > /\ /\ > / \/^\ /\ /\/\/\ /^\ /\ /^/\^\ /\ >Al Gates\^/ \/\ / \/ \/\/ \/\ / ^ \/ \^^^\ >BDM Corporation \/\ /^\ / {seismo,rlgvax}!bdmrrr!gates \ /\ \ >7915 Jones Branch Drive\/ \ \ / \ / \ \ >McLean, Virginia 22102 \ \ \/ \/ \ \ I do not remember having seen Al's signature until a few days ago. At that time it was appended to a message defending graphic signatures. Actually, I thought that it was a hoax, intended to poke fun at graphic signatures. It didn't have a smily face, but some folks do not know about them. Some do not consider them necessary when the message is heavy enough. That signature was legit!??!?!! -- [This signature file intentionally left blank.]