Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Info on OS9 Operating System
Message-ID: <417@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 13:56:29 EST
Article-I.D.: graffiti.417
Posted: Fri Nov  8 13:56:29 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 09:24:16 EST
References: <347@wlbr.UUCP> <9500001@datacube.UUCP> <375@graffiti.UUCP> <898@lsuc.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 17

>      Well, first of all, as I've said before, a Gimix Level II system
> (which is the one I'd probably use) has memory management, and dedicated
> IO processors for that matter.  But memory management isn't that much
> an issue when you consider we're talking about word processing and possibly
> a bit of database stuff -- *not* development work.  End users running
> say Databank and Stylograph don't need to worry about memory management.
> It simply wouldn't help even if you had it.

(1) There are no bug-free programs.
(2) I *AM* talking about development work. If all you're doing is running
canned software you might as well stick with CP/M... it's a lot cheaper than
either OS/9 or UNIX.
-- 
Name: Peter da Silva
Graphic: `-_-'
UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter
IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter