Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site umd5.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!cvl!umd5!don From: don@umd5.UUCP Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: Re: Kirk and Morrow's jobs Message-ID: <772@umd5.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 12:08:20 EST Article-I.D.: umd5.772 Posted: Sun Nov 3 12:08:20 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 08:40:13 EST References: <649@h-sc1.UUCP> <691@hou2g.UUCP> <574@riccb.UUCP> Reply-To: don@umd5.UUCP (Don Preuss) Organization: U of Md, CSC, College Park, Md Lines: 29 In article <574@riccb.UUCP> rjnoe@riccb.UUCP (Roger J. Noe) writes: >> Kirk was never "Chief of Starfleet Operations". That was the guy who >> forbade Kirk from going to the Genesis planet. >Oh, yes he was! >[...] >Kirk's reply is: >"Two and a half years as Chief of Starfleet Operations may have made me a >little stale, but . . . . They gave her back to me, Scotty!" >In "Star Trek: The Search for Spock" Admiral Morrow is Commander, Starfleet. >Just a bit higher than Kirk. Admiral Morrow is indeed Starfleet Commander -- this means that he is THE big shot in Starfleet. (Like one of the Joint Chiefs of Staff). Admiral Kirk is Chief of Starfleet Operations -- in the area of Education and Training. Why else would Kirk have been at the training scenario and on the cadet cruise? -- --==---==---==-- "What happened ?" "It seems the occipital area of my head impacted with the arm of the chair." "No, I mean, what happened to us ?" "That has yet to be surmised." ARPA: don@umd5.ARPA BITNET: don%umd5@umd2 SPOKEN: Chris Sylvain UUCP: { {allegra, seismo}!umcp-cs, ihnp4!rlgvax }!cvl!umd5!don