Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!myers
From: myers@uwmacc.UUCP (Latitudinarian Lobster)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Supply-side Economics: the  Savings
Message-ID: <1671@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 14:53:08 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.1671
Posted: Fri Nov  8 14:53:08 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 15:15:41 EST
References: <756@whuxl.UUCP> <29200244@uiucdcs>, <362@whuts.UUCP> <274@pyuxii.UUCP>
Organization: Ken Kopp's Fresh Seafood Tank
Lines: 23

> Well, back to form.  Sevener, your full of bull.  Having gotten'
> that out of the way, I would suggest that you take off the
> blinders and examine the world around you.  In the first place,
> your remarks concerning Social Security and Income Security
> are mixing apples and oranges.  They do not mean the same thing.
> Social spending does NOT include social security payments.
> Look it up.

The figures posted which are under contention WERE mixing apples and oranges,
not Mr. Sevener (who, like most bulls, has alot of balls).  The figures
posted by the original poster for Income Security were actually
Income Security + Social Security + Medicare.  Look it up.
[in a recent *Economic Report of the President*.]

> Even the
> most staunch liberal historians agree that Hoover was eucherd [euchred]
> in this deal.
> T. C. Wheeler

Wow, I've finally found something that I have in common with el sen~or
Wheeler -- euchre!  Truly a great game...anybody for a pbm game?

J. D. Myers