Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site desint.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!desint!geoff From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: code quality Message-ID: <132@desint.UUCP> Date: Sat, 26-Oct-85 23:07:17 EST Article-I.D.: desint.132 Posted: Sat Oct 26 23:07:17 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 04:29:11 EST References: <2012@brl-tgr.ARPA> <8952@ritcv.UUCP> <312@codas.UUCP> Reply-To: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) Organization: SAH Consulting, Manhattan Beach, CA Lines: 15 In article <312@codas.UUCP> mikel@codas.UUCP (Mikel Manitius) writes: >Someone somewhere should think of setting up a "credit office" for >programer information, so that "trojan horse" programers would not >last very long. [to avoid misunderstandings, he's talking about incompetents who can't write C, not people who write "trojan horse" programs] I just ask interviewees to bring along a code sample. If they can't produce one, or I don't like what I see, no job. -- Geoff Kuenning {hplabs,ihnp4}!trwrb!desint!geoff