Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Ghostbusting Brevard Childs
Message-ID: <2033@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 00:55:32 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.2033
Posted: Mon Nov  4 00:55:32 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 07:09:48 EST
References: <1222@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <1981@umcp-cs.UUCP> <425@cylixd.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 21

>>I don't think Man is in need of any "supernatural" redemption.  I don't
>>think any supernatural redemption is either possible or necessary.  I
>>don't think the canon should be "valorized" in the way Childs sets out
>>to do.  I don't think the (Christian) tradition should be valorized.
>>I don't accept the statement of the problem and therefore "the truth of
>>the gospel of Jesus Christ" is no answer.  [GARY BUCHOLZ?]

> Does anyone else have the same problem with Gary's postings that I do?
> I can't understand them.  I don't think he and I are writing in the
> same language. [CHARLI]

That's odd, because I find them quite sensible.  Perhaps you simply cannot
fathom some of his very simple notions because of your particular belief
structure.  Such as:

> }Man is not sinful, and therefore doesn't need to be redeemed from sin.
> }The canon and Christian tradition contradict this premise, and are
> }therefore not true.
-- 
"iY AHORA, INFORMACION INTERESANTE ACERCA DE... LA LLAMA!"
	Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr