Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdahl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!nsc!amdahl!mat From: mat@amdahl.UUCP (Mike Taylor) Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: Re: Apple suing Jobs Message-ID: <2186@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Sat, 2-Nov-85 20:06:00 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.2186 Posted: Sat Nov 2 20:06:00 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 09:19:40 EST References: <429@imsvax.UUCP> <438@looking.UUCP> <583@bonnie.UUCP> Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 21 > In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes: > > >Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs > >is in deep water with his actions. The "Errors and Omissions" > >insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one! > > I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at > Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no > day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says. > Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer > in absense of responsibilities? (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer > until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case) > -- He's a 'real' company officer until his resignation has been voted on and accepted by the board of directors, regardless of whether or not he is doing any work. -- Mike Taylor ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,sun}!amdahl!mat [ This may not reflect my opinion, let alone anyone else's. ]