Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucdavis!ccrdave From: ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless) Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: The next Star Trek Movie??? Message-ID: <201@ucdavis.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 00:30:05 EST Article-I.D.: ucdavis.201 Posted: Tue Oct 29 00:30:05 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:12:00 EST References: <213@astroatc.UUCP> Organization: University of California, Davis Lines: 25 > In article <187@ur-tut.UUCP> scco@ur-tut.UUCP (Sean Colbath) writes: > >responsable for the travesty performed on the Klingons in the movies? > >Those costumes are hidious!!! The series depiction was much better.. > > First: I quite agree!!!!!!!!!!!! (They were *Supposed* to be EVIL and > sinistar!!) They were *COMICAL*, and that did NOT fit The costumes were pretty dumb looking. We're considering a libel suit. But, let's face it, they called the ship in III a "Bird of Prey", Which leads us to the next point... > Personally, I think the sieries authors didn't know the difference > between Romulans and Klingons. Kirk sure doesn't. In his opening lines in II, he says that Klingons never take prisoners. 1) He'd been a Klingon prisoner. (Captain Kang, Day of the Dove) 2) The incident was in Romulan space. Why bring Klingons into the picture? > UUCP: ... {seismo | harvard | ihnp4} !uwvax!astroatc!johnw Lord Kahless