Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site teklds.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!tektronix!teklds!davidl From: davidl@teklds.UUCP (David Levine) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.micro.atari,net.micro.mac,net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: DRI agrees to change GEM Message-ID: <1175@teklds.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 12:36:08 EDT Article-I.D.: teklds.1175 Posted: Thu Oct 24 12:36:08 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 04:42:44 EDT References: <3208@nsc.UUCP> <1196@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Reply-To: davidl@teklds.UUCP (David Levine) Followup-To: net.micro.pc Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 40 Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:5713 net.micro.atari:1492 net.micro.mac:3145 net.micro.amiga:486 Summary: In article <799@hou2d.UUCP> xxajtxx@hou2d.UUCP (A.THANGARAJ) writes: > A more visionary Apple might have forseen that GEM, by introducing >IBM PC and compatible users to a MAC-like interface, was helping to propagate >a standard user interface in the PC industry... > ... If only all drawing, painting and desktop programs would >confirm to a standard screen display, ... the personal computer industry >as a whole would benefit... >This would, in the long run, benefit Apple itself! > ... Whereas the "MAC-like User Interface" may have >soon become the industry standard, displacing anything put out by IBM or >Microsoft, Apple has now forfeited that position. I just have to put my two bits in on this one. Apple has nothing to gain and everything to lose by letting the "Mac-LIKE user interface" (emphasis mine) become a standard. The hordes of business computer users who think that IBM is the only name in computers have no reason to buy Apple products unless they are in some way clearly superior to IBM. This superiority can be in price, features, performance or what have you, as long as it's enough of a DIFFERENCE to make up for lack of IBM compatibility. If the "Mac-like user interface" is available on the IBM PC, short-sighted grey suits will see no reason at all to buy a Mac. Thus, Apple (as a profit-making business) has no choice but to protect its differences. This article reminds me of those who said in 1980 that IBM's entry into the personal computer field would "legitimize" the industry. (Remember when "PC" meant "a personal computer", not "an IBM-compatible 16-bit MS-DOS computer"? Remember Osborne and Victor? Remember when micros were an adventure?) I've directed followups to net.micro.pc only. This branch of the discussion is taking off in an IBM-compatible direction. By the way, what DOES that .signature with the two tombstones mean? David D. Levine (...decvax!tektronix!teklds!davidl) [UUCP] (teklds!davidl.tektronix@csnet-relay) [ARPA/CSNET] P.S. Forgive me for spouting off, but it looks like I'm going to be forced to use a PC at work (can you imagine the pain of using MS-DOS every day when you're used to the power of UNIX?) and the very thought of IBM just makes me sick.