Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ius2.cs.cmu.edu
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ius2.cs.cmu.edu!ralphw
From: ralphw@ius2.cs.cmu.edu (Ralph Hyre)
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: GEE WHIZ, FELLERS
Message-ID: <224@ius2.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 13:25:47 EST
Article-I.D.: ius2.224
Posted: Wed Oct 30 13:25:47 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 07:28:35 EST
References: <2558@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 24

Part of the problem is postings from the usenet side, I imagine.
A lot of news reading software posts messages to all groups included
in the original message, which actually may have had some relevance
to amateur radio issues (and therefore info-hams and net.ham-radio)

There was a net.tvro for a while, but it went away.  Perhaps a new group
(say, called mod.telecom.home-sat) could be created for tvro users
If there is too much tvro traffic for this group, and we complain enough
about it (to the right people), then there may be some relief.
Accoring the the usenet 'rules', one criterion for creating
a new group is sufficient volume in a current newsgroup to 
justify spinning it off into a separate one.
--
				- Ralph
Internet: ralphw@c.cs.cmu.edu (cmu-cs-c.arpa)
Usenet: ralphw@mit-eddie.uucp
Fidonet: Ralph Hyre at Fido #385 Pitt-Bull (or maybe Net 129, node 0)
Snail Mail: don't bother
-- 
				- Ralph
Internet: ralphw@c.cs.cmu.edu (cmu-cs-c.arpa)
Usenet: ralphw@mit-eddie.uucp
Fidonet: Ralph Hyre at Fido #385 Pitt-Bull (or maybe Net 129, node 0)
Snail Mail: don't bother