Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!greipa!pesnta!amd!amdcad!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!mangoe From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) Newsgroups: net.religion.christian Subject: Re: Ghostbusting Brevard Childs Message-ID: <2120@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Nov-85 01:27:28 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2120 Posted: Wed Nov 6 01:27:28 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 05:42:58 EST References: <2033@pyuxd.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 19 In article <2033@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes: >> Does anyone else have the same problem with Gary's postings that I do? >> I can't understand them. I don't think he and I are writing in the >> same language. [CHARLI] [not Wingate] >That's odd, because I find them quite sensible. Perhaps you simply cannot >fathom some of his very simple notions because of your particular belief >structure. Such as: >> }Man is not sinful, and therefore doesn't need to be redeemed from sin. >> }The canon and Christian tradition contradict this premise, and are >> }therefore not true. You find them sensible because he starts at the same assumptions and draws the same conclusion that you do. Big deal. By the way: would you care to explain how it is that you know that Man is not sinful? Charley Wingate