Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!jabusch From: jabusch@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: 386 Architectural Description Message-ID: <4400126@uiucdcsb> Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 20:08:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.4400126 Posted: Mon Nov 4 20:08:00 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 03:47:50 EST References: <130@intelca.UUCP> Lines: 31 Nf-ID: #R:intelca.UUCP:-13000:uiucdcsb:4400126:000:1304 Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!jabusch Nov 4 19:08:00 1985 I am interested in seeing/hearing the latest on the market. I am not so prejudiced as to eliminate Intel. As they are making money at what they are doing, I can't claim that they're doing everything wrong. I consider myself open to new ideas, and am not opposed to this sort of article at all. I see no reason why someone may not post this, when a good percentage of the last year's articles flamed Intel for one reason or another. I have read 68k hype from people other than Motorola reps on this net for quite some time. After this last series of notes flaming Intel for posting a couple of (relatively) brief articles, I wonder how many of you who flamed will embarrassed enough that you don't respond later with 68k or 32k or ... hype. I say keep the articles brief and informative, and let everyone do it. Perhaps it might be more appropriate in net.arch, but it's still interesting. these are my own opinions.... etc. John W. Jabusch U.S. Mail: Department of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Room 230 Digital Computer Laboratory 1304 West Springfield Avenue Urbana, IL 61801 CSNET: jabusch%uiuc@csnet-relay.ARPA UUCP: {ihnp4,convex,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!jabusch USENET: ...!{pur-ee,ihnp4}!uiucdcs!jabusch ARPA: jabusch@uiuc.arpa