Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site lll-crg.ARpA Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!booter From: booter@lll-crg.ARpA (Elaine Richards) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Precision, Please Message-ID: <951@lll-crg.ARpA> Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 03:33:02 EST Article-I.D.: lll-crg.951 Posted: Tue Oct 29 03:33:02 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Nov-85 00:19:45 EST References: <1044@decwrl.UUCP> Reply-To: booter@lll-crg.UUCP (Elaine Richards) Organization: Chocoholics Non-Anonymous Lines: 29 How about using mathematical notation when describing groups of people? A friend just tutored me in equivalence relations today. Ex. "Many men say blah blah blah" Goes something like M={m e M ! said=(blah) cubed } Forget it. I can't get notation out of this thing. I just leafed through a lot of these as I just subscribed. Question... why do so many men throw in their two cents? Kilts? Ties? Mensan in the raw? Is it just a good sexual sounding board for non net.singles or do the men feel they will get an insight into how women think? It amazes me how much men worry about how women think and how I don't worry how men think. (People are relatively predictable - **BELIEVE IT OR NOT*) Looks like we need a net.men or a net.sociology for many of the issues raised. net.singles doesn't cover married folk, but has topics everyone thinks about. Its late B={booter e B! said (blah) cubed} Gnight all.... booter ****** (Why bother addressing it, let your Vax do the walking....)