Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site birtch.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!felix!birtch!oleg From: oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev x268) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Dynamic Headroom/Carver Power Amps/NAD 2200/Hafler 220 Message-ID: <56@birtch.UUCP> Date: Sun, 27-Oct-85 04:17:44 EST Article-I.D.: birtch.56 Posted: Sun Oct 27 04:17:44 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 29-Oct-85 01:21:32 EST References: <1039@cornell.UUCP> <184@birtch.UUCP> <799@psivax.UUCP> Reply-To: oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev x268) Organization: Birtcher, Santa Ana, Ca. Lines: 61 Keywords: I NEED MORE POWER!!!!!!!!!! Summary: In article <799@psivax.UUCP> tommie@psivax.UUCP (Tom Levin) writes: >I listened to the NAD 2200 last weekend at the local snob-shop. Along >with the amp was an NAD preamplifier (don't recall the model), an NAD >cd player (I really disliked the cd player, but that is a different ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I have sampled NAD CD players before and I agree with you -- they are terrible! >I brought the telarc recording of the 1812 overture >along with Dave Grusins "Mountain Dance" (both discs are DDD). > >So how did I like it? The amp put out a LOT of sound. I was really >quite impressed by the sheer volume that the infinity/NAD combination >put out. It's really hard to separate the sound of the speakers from >the amplifier since I didn't listen to any other amps, so I can't tell >you "hey, this amp sounds great". While it is true that the NAD has lots of My experience with Carver (400 & 500t) was that ALL speakers in the listening room had shown a dramatic improvement in sound quality and a significant decrease in differences between the diverce brands and models. It was very sur- prising to find that when connected to Carver, speakers I could not tolerate before sounded quite acceptable >headroom (just read stereo review this month! :-)), when I put You _beleive_ Stereo Review???? >on the 1812 CD, the cannons caused the amp to shut down (I told the >salesman, "you better turn it down pal!...Sheesh...they never listen! :-)). >Anyways he turned it way down and we replayed the cannons...it still shut >down! Then he put on "Time Warp" by Eric Kunzel and the Cincinnati Pops... >that CD also shut the NAD down! > >What I'm trying to say is that even at what I considered reasonable >levels, these CD's shut the amp down! The dynamic range of the NAD >is supposedly 6db too! I was going to compare the Hafler to the NAD, >but it was in the next room and I was a little discouraged anyways >cuz the NAD is more powerful (more watts and more dynamic headroom) >than the Hafler. My experience was not THAT dramatic. Though I am concidering torture-testing Carver in that fashion now that you mentioned it. I was listening to Bach's Brandenburg Con., Beethoven's 5th & 3rd, Peter Gabriel's "Security", Paniagua's "Ancient Greek Music" ( ??? not sure about the title). Paniagua's CD is full of human voices (VERY natural ones), loud, ethnic-like of un-adorned brass and bone instruments, plucked strings and a sound of a metallic bell ( cow bell?) being thrown on the floor(!). It will not match 1812 guns but it DID test the amp's ability to produce an explosion of high frequency signals without clipping. Carver M500t AND M400 did a great job on the dropped bell. 500t made a few people jump -- it was SO real! (Anecdote from CARVER propaganda : It takes 2000+ watt amp to more or less accurately reproduce a sound of scissors snipping at REALISTIC volume and level without clipping and distortion) -- Disclamer: My employers go to church every Sunday, listen to Country music, and donate money to GOP. I am just a deviant. ----------------------------------+ Don't bother, I'll find the door, "Only through a violent revolution| Oleg Kiselev. can the existing order be pre- |...!trwrb!felix!birtch!oleg served..."-Perfect Student Union |...!{ihnp4|randvax}!ucla-cs!uclapic!oac6!oleg