Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!phillips
From: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.bio,net.origins
Subject: Re: Darwin
Message-ID: <2063@reed.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 00:10:47 EST
Article-I.D.: reed.2063
Posted: Tue Oct 29 00:10:47 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:39:51 EST
References: <1185@ames.UUCP> <383@mot.UUCP>
Reply-To: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips)
Distribution: net
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 9
Xref: watmath net.bio:298 net.origins:2531
Summary: 

>"Oh Yes, and the amount of Lamarckism depends on which edition you read."
>Maybe it was edited out by revisionists?

Actually, I think that the amount of Lamarckism increased with the
editions.  Darwin was apparently less secure with the importance of
natural selection as time went along.  (At least that's what Earnst 
Mayr says).

	-Patrick Phillips