Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ius2.cs.cmu.edu Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ius2.cs.cmu.edu!ralphw From: ralphw@ius2.cs.cmu.edu (Ralph Hyre) Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.mac,net.legal Subject: Re: Apple suing Jobs Message-ID: <225@ius2.cs.cmu.edu> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 13:35:24 EST Article-I.D.: ius2.225 Posted: Wed Oct 30 13:35:24 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:01:46 EST References: <429@imsvax.UUCP> <438@looking.UUCP> <583@bonnie.UUCP> Followup-To: net.legal Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 18 Xref: watmath net.micro:12539 net.micro.mac:3215 net.legal:2518 In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes: >Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs >is in deep water with his actions. The "Errors and Omissions" >insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one! I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says. Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer in absense of responsibilities? (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case) -- - Ralph Internet: ralphw@c.cs.cmu.edu (cmu-cs-c.arpa) Usenet: ralphw@mit-eddie.uucp Fidonet: Ralph Hyre at Fido #385 Pitt-Bull (or maybe Net 129, node 0) Snail Mail: don't bother