Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!credmond
From: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond)
Newsgroups: net.games.chess
Subject: Notation
Message-ID: <96@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 22:41:03 EST
Article-I.D.: watmath.96
Posted: Wed Nov 13 22:41:03 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 03:06:04 EST
References: <359@tekchips.UUCP> <22300011@uiucdcsp>
Reply-To: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 17

>>
>>     1. P-K4	P-QB4		       22.R-R3	   B-N2
>>     2. N-KB3	P-Q3		       23.B-K3     R-K2
>
>This "other" notation is called "inferior."

Inferior, all right. All it does is tell you what piece moved to
what square, so you can follow the game in your head.  Wouldn't
want that kind of pandering to human beings now, would we?
Might interfere with machine-readability.

  :-) , I think.   Maybe :-( instead.

Come on, guys: a lot of people LIKE traditional notation.
Me, for one.