Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dicomed.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!oliveb!hplabs!qantel!ihnp4!dicomed!stryker From: stryker@dicomed.UUCP (d. j. stryker) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Did anyone understand PLENTY? (sort of a little spoiler) Message-ID: <644@dicomed.UUCP> Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 11:14:36 EST Article-I.D.: dicomed.644 Posted: Fri Nov 8 11:14:36 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 01:16:49 EST References: <805@asgb.UUCP> <1536@cae780.UUCP> Reply-To: stryker@dicomed.UUCP (d. j. stryker) Distribution: na Organization: DICOMED Corp., Minneapolis Lines: 15 In article <1536@cae780.UUCP> alan@cae780.UUCP (Alan M. Steinberg) writes: >>I just saw Meryl Streep's latest: "PLENTY". I feel frustrated and like >>I've missed something along the way, but the whole show seemed to drag >>along... I was left with a feeling of "What was the point?" > >-- > Alan Steinberg I thought the 'point' was to create a role for Meryl Streep. If there were good qualities in this flick I missed them too. The characters had nothing to do with any reality I've ever come in contact with. And Meryl Streep ought to go to passion school or meet an Italian lover or something. She's got about as much life in her as a bowl of oatmeal. still yawning--- don