Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!dmcanzi From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Child Pornography Message-ID: <1823@watdcsu.UUCP> Date: Sat, 2-Nov-85 01:59:56 EST Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1823 Posted: Sat Nov 2 01:59:56 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 07:01:38 EST References: <1669@watdcsu.UUCP> <11729@rochester.UUCP> <30973@lanl.ARPA> <2425@sunybcs.UUCP> Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 19 Summary: In article <2425@sunybcs.UUCP> colonel@sunybcs.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman) writes: >> > How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal? It would have >> > to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting. I would like >> > to see your reasons for why child porn should be made illegal. >> >> How about "because you can't make child porn without using children >> and it is already illegal to use children for such purposes" ??? > >How about animated child pornography? Or even comic books? No >exploitation there. Nothing wrong with it, then. > "I know a sheep-lover who likes to look at clouds. Do YOU > like to look at clouds?" No, I prefer the sheep. :-) -- David Canzi "Permission is not freedom."