Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.religion.christian Subject: Re: Ghostbusting Brevard Childs Message-ID: <2033@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 00:55:32 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.2033 Posted: Mon Nov 4 00:55:32 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 07:09:48 EST References: <1222@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <1981@umcp-cs.UUCP> <425@cylixd.UUCP> Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week Lines: 21 >>I don't think Man is in need of any "supernatural" redemption. I don't >>think any supernatural redemption is either possible or necessary. I >>don't think the canon should be "valorized" in the way Childs sets out >>to do. I don't think the (Christian) tradition should be valorized. >>I don't accept the statement of the problem and therefore "the truth of >>the gospel of Jesus Christ" is no answer. [GARY BUCHOLZ?] > Does anyone else have the same problem with Gary's postings that I do? > I can't understand them. I don't think he and I are writing in the > same language. [CHARLI] That's odd, because I find them quite sensible. Perhaps you simply cannot fathom some of his very simple notions because of your particular belief structure. Such as: > }Man is not sinful, and therefore doesn't need to be redeemed from sin. > }The canon and Christian tradition contradict this premise, and are > }therefore not true. -- "iY AHORA, INFORMACION INTERESANTE ACERCA DE... LA LLAMA!" Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr