Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site pid.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!pid!pwd
From: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.sources.amiga - (Lets make it a SOURCE group if we do it)
Message-ID: <199@pid.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Nov-85 06:22:04 EST
Article-I.D.: pid.199
Posted: Mon Nov 11 06:22:04 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Nov-85 04:22:00 EST
References: <45100015@infoswx>
Reply-To: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple)
Followup-To: net.news.group
Organization: P & I Design, Inc. Atlanta
Lines: 30
Keywords: amaga source group
Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:683 net.news.group:4458
Summary: 

In article <45100015@infoswx> bees@infoswx.UUCP writes:
>
>Isn't it time to create a net.sources.amiga and also decide on
>a standard for posting binary, ala BINHEX or what ever is best?

Why don't we use source so that the code can be changed as well as used.
one of the biggest problems with net.sources.mac is that it is in large
part not source code but binary. 
>
>I vote yea... please vote, too.  This and all responses should
>be cross posted here and to net.news.group.  If response is
>great enough, the group will be created.

I must say that I would rather wait a while until more people get there
systems and some real source (like the shells that have been talked about)
are posted.  For now net.micro.amiga is not too full to talk about spliting
it in two parts.

I included all of the first artical because it was NOT posted to net.news.group
followup-to will go to net.news.group only (unless you want to change it)
>
>Ray Davis
>Teknekron Infoswitch, Richardson, TX
>infoswx!bees, (214)644-0570


-- 
Philip Dalrymple
akgua!pid!pwd
404/429-8266 (voice)