Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!jabusch
From: jabusch@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: 386 Architectural Description
Message-ID: <4400126@uiucdcsb>
Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 20:08:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.4400126
Posted: Mon Nov  4 20:08:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 03:47:50 EST
References: <130@intelca.UUCP>
Lines: 31
Nf-ID: #R:intelca.UUCP:-13000:uiucdcsb:4400126:000:1304
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!jabusch    Nov  4 19:08:00 1985



	I am interested in seeing/hearing the latest on the market.  I am
not so prejudiced as to eliminate Intel.  As they are making money at what
they are doing, I can't claim that they're doing everything wrong.
	I consider myself open to new ideas, and am not opposed to this
sort of article at all.  I see no reason why someone may not post this, 
when a good percentage of the last year's articles flamed Intel for one
reason or another.  I have read 68k hype from people other than Motorola 
reps on this net for quite some time.  After this last series of notes
flaming Intel for posting a couple of (relatively) brief articles, I 
wonder how many of you who flamed will embarrassed enough that you don't
respond later with 68k or 32k or ... hype.
	I say keep the articles brief and informative, and let everyone 
do it.  Perhaps it might be more appropriate in net.arch, but it's still
interesting.

these are my own opinions.... etc.

John W. Jabusch
U.S. Mail:
	Department of Computer Science
	University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
	Room 230 Digital Computer Laboratory
	1304 West Springfield Avenue
	Urbana, IL 61801

        CSNET:	jabusch%uiuc@csnet-relay.ARPA
	UUCP:	{ihnp4,convex,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!jabusch
        USENET:	...!{pur-ee,ihnp4}!uiucdcs!jabusch
        ARPA:	jabusch@uiuc.arpa