Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!amdcad!jimb From: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler) Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sources Subject: Re: As long as we are taliking about rmgrouping ... Message-ID: <5647@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 03:51:50 EST Article-I.D.: amdcad.5647 Posted: Fri Nov 1 03:51:50 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 06:23:05 EST References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <136@vcvax1.UUCP> <687@ucsfcgl.UUCP> Reply-To: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler) Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 24 Xref: watmath net.news.group:4150 net.sources:3773 In article <687@ucsfcgl.UUCP> arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold) writes: > >Not to jump on Eli, but this ain't too cool an idea. The problem > >The only solution is to eliminate net.sources.* in favor of mod.sources.* > > Ken Arnold The problem with mod.anything has always been that the moderator 'evaluates' the posting. His criteria will vary according to: 1) His beliefs. 2) How much time he has. What happened to 'the free interchange of ideas'. Can't you gurus come up with a mechanism of control which does not depend on your placing people of your choice in a position of power to control the flow of ideas and expressions to the rest of us out here? -- Jim Budler Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (408) 749-5806 Usenet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amdcad!jimb Compuserve: 72415,1200