Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site usl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!usl!arh
From: arh@usl.UUCP (Al the swamp-sailor)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: Anyone for net.compiler?
Message-ID: <655@usl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 17:03:22 EST
Article-I.D.: usl.655
Posted: Wed Oct 30 17:03:22 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:13:25 EST
References: <344@chalmers.UUCP>
Reply-To: arh@usl.UUCP (Al the swamp-sailor)
Organization: USL, Lafayette, LA
Lines: 22
Keywords: language directed architectures

In article <344@chalmers.UUCP> johnsson@chalmers.UUCP (Thomas Johnsson) writes:
>> 	I've been ramblin, but I would like to see if there is interest in a
>> newsgroup for compiler subjects(probably called net.compiler) that would
>> cover the more "black magic" topics of register allocation, LR parser error
>> recovery, Stack machine to non-stack machine mapping, etc...
>
>> Peter Barada
>> {ihnp4!inmet|{harvard|cca}!ima}!pbear!peterb
>
>
>Yes! Another vote for net.compiler! A lot of the discussions in both
>net.arch and net.lang are really about compiler technology.

	I tend to disagree, folks.  A lot of the discussions have been
relevent insofar as they discuss items that are addressed in so-called
'language directed architectures'.  Perhaps a better idea would be a
net.arch subgroup....  say net.arch.langdir ?

						Al Hooton

					.... usl!arh
					arh@usl.UUCP