Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k Subject: Re: Re: Re: Info on OS9 Operating System Message-ID: <375@graffiti.UUCP> Date: Thu, 31-Oct-85 13:46:53 EST Article-I.D.: graffiti.375 Posted: Thu Oct 31 13:46:53 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 06:49:04 EST References: <347@wlbr.UUCP> <9500001@datacube.UUCP> Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 16 > In article <286@steinmetz.UUCP> davidsen@kbsvax.UUCP (Davidsen) writes: > > > >People who assume that UNIX must have huge quantities of {disk, memory, cpu > > ... > >the future some additional software will be installed, but the system > >including printer was < $5k, and runs in 640k for three users. The nroff > > With 640K under OS-9 I could support 6-8 for similar work (Level II OS-9 But how many people would trust a multiuser system with no memory management? For single-user use, yes, but multiuser? -- Name: Peter da Silva Graphic: `-_-' UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter