Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 Unisoft-Cosmos; site kepler.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!well!micropro!kepler!mojo From: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: What happens when posting to the new mod.* groups Message-ID: <356@kepler.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Nov-85 00:44:19 EST Article-I.D.: kepler.356 Posted: Tue Nov 12 00:44:19 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 13-Nov-85 20:43:17 EST References: <338@kepler.UUCP> <634@Glacier.ARPA> <1929@gatech.CSNET> Reply-To: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones) Distribution: na Organization: MicroPro Int'l Corp., San Rafael, CA Lines: 24 In article <1929@gatech.CSNET> spaf@gatech.UUCP (Gene Spafford) writes: >If anybody would bother to read the "moderators" and "active lists" >articles I post to mod.newslists and net.announce.newusers they would >see that I describe: 1) what happens when you try to post to a "mod" >group; and, 2) that some mod groups are simply mail reflectors with no >moderator. Gene, I knew what to expect when I posted my test to mod.protocols.appletalk. The point of my posting here is that THESE GROUPS ARE NOT MODERATED. It amazes me that Erik was such a stickler for accurate naming of the groups while continuing to call them mod groups. They aren't moderated. Now I like the arrangement of these groups. But I think there should be a moderator controlling the gateway between the mailing list and USENET. Suggestion: Get moderators for the new groups, located at a gateway site. -- Mojo ... Morris Jones, MicroPro Product Development {ptsfa,hplabs,glacier,lll-crg}!well!micropro!kepler!mojo {ucbvax,decwrl}!dual!micropro!kepler!mojo