Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site spar.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!spar!ellis From: ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion Subject: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools. Message-ID: <620@spar.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Oct-85 14:55:07 EDT Article-I.D.: spar.620 Posted: Fri Oct 25 14:55:07 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 07:39:49 EDT References: <1900@pyuxd.UUCP> <1753@akgua.UUCP> <1953@pyuxd.UUCP> Reply-To: ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) Organization: Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, CA Lines: 25 Xref: linus net.politics:11002 net.religion:7653 Summary: >> Gimme a break Rosen. I didn't twist Goedel and I didn't >> offer proof you dufus...I said maybe....I said "if we extrapolate.." >> >> Most people recognize this as specualtion...not proof. >> >> Bob Brown {...ihnp4!akgua!rjb} > >1. You most certainly did twist Godel. > >2. Most people don't use a speculation as proof of a belief. If that's > not what you're doing, then what proof DO you have for your beliefs? > >3. Nice tone coming from a (to use Wingate's punctuation technique) > "cHRISTIAN'. > Rich 1. Show us, Rich. What is illogical about God as a truth that is not verifiable from within a rational, empirical system? 2. You have no proof for your religion, either, Rich. 3. You betchum, Red Rider.. -michael