Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site oakhill.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!oakhill!davet From: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: Parapsychology. Message-ID: <565@oakhill.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 23:22:39 EST Article-I.D.: oakhill.565 Posted: Thu Oct 24 23:22:39 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Oct-85 05:41:27 EST References: <970@decwrl.UUCP> <796@cybvax0.UUCP> Reply-To: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx Lines: 20 In article <796@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes: >> >> Glad to. .... > >[Description of literature of >3000 papers omitted.] > > >The fact is, there is NO demonstrable, reproducible psychic phenominon >after who knows how many years of research. .... > Um... Yea. Out of all those >3000 papers there was absolutely NO PSI documented. And the greatest part is that Mike didn't have to look at any of those 3000 papers to know that. I guess that sums up the validy of ESP. Mike's 'knowlege at a distance' clairvoyance would seem the best proof of the validity of ESP seen yet in this discussion. -- Dave Trissel {seismo,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet