Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekgvs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe From: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Mr. Udell's hassles with Technics and Stereo Scene Message-ID: <1281@tekgvs.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 20:02:57 EST Article-I.D.: tekgvs.1281 Posted: Mon Nov 4 20:02:57 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Nov-85 03:45:32 EST References: <7651@watrose.UUCP> Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson) Distribution: net Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 15 Summary: In article <7651@watrose.UUCP> rpjday@watrose.UUCP (rpjday) writes: > > It may be unfair to take someone's advice about "don't but brand X >because I hate it", but Mr. Udell seems to have a very strong, >well-researched case here. Do we or do we not let it affect our >choice of our next CD player? Too late - I already *did* use his info and _passed_ on a possible Technics CD purchase. I'm glad he took the time to let us know about the problems. That's one of the best things in this newsgroup. -- Keith Ericson at TekLabs (resident factious factotum) Tektronix, PO 500, MS 58-383 Beaverton OR 97077 (503)627-6042 uucp:[ucbvax|decvax|ihnp4|(and_many_others)]!tektronix!tekgvs!keithe CSnet:keithe@tek ARPAnet: keithe.tek@rand-relay