Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdahl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!nsc!amdahl!mat
From: mat@amdahl.UUCP (Mike Taylor)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Apple suing Jobs
Message-ID: <2186@amdahl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 2-Nov-85 20:06:00 EST
Article-I.D.: amdahl.2186
Posted: Sat Nov  2 20:06:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Nov-85 09:19:40 EST
References: <429@imsvax.UUCP> <438@looking.UUCP> <583@bonnie.UUCP>
Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 21

> In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes:
> 
> >Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs
> >is in deep water with his actions.  The "Errors and Omissions"
> >insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one!
> 
> I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at
> Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no
> day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says.
> Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer
> in absense of responsibilities?  (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer
> until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case)
> -- 

He's a 'real' company officer until his resignation has been voted on
and accepted by the board of directors, regardless of whether or not
he is doing any work.
-- 
Mike Taylor                        ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,sun}!amdahl!mat

[ This may not reflect my opinion, let alone anyone else's.  ]