Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site petfe.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!petfe!evan From: evan@petfe.UUCP (Evan Marcus) Newsgroups: net.tv Subject: Amazing Stories 11/10 Message-ID: <556@petfe.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Nov-85 12:38:54 EST Article-I.D.: petfe.556 Posted: Mon Nov 11 12:38:54 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 12-Nov-85 04:45:57 EST Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls, N.J. Lines: 24 I have a feeling that most people did not like this Amazing Stories (Fine Tuning was the title). I loved it, but to do so, I had to compromise some things that I look for in TV like logic and intelligence. It was SO Spielbergish, viz the kid, his parents, the aliens, the too happy ending, and the ridiculous premise. And while I hated The Mission, I thought this episode worked perfectly. The odds against the kid tuning into just the right signal, and their displaying everything so he could understand it and it being 'tonight', and their finding them in Hollywood, are all pretty outrageous. But I don't mind, because we were fed this all along. And it was funny. The Mission was melodramatic, and a little spooky, and not fun at all. I knew to expect hokey from this one, and I got it, so it's OK. I think that Fine Tuning did what Amazing Stories should always do: the smile didn't leave my face from the beginning of the story until about 3 minutes into Hitchcock. What more can you ask from TV? OK, now who hated it? Edward Bennett? :-) --Evan Marcus -- {ucbvax|decvax}!vax135!petsd!petfe!evan ...!pedsgd!pedsga!evan Who messed with my anti-paranoia shot?