Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 5/22/85; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!db From: db@cbosgd.UUCP (J. Muir) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.internat Message-ID: <1570@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Oct-85 20:46:28 EDT Article-I.D.: cbosgd.1570 Posted: Fri Oct 25 20:46:28 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 08:25:05 EDT Reply-To: db@cbosgd.UUCP (J. Muir) Organization: The Bohemian Grove Lines: 13 Why don't y'all just follow the earlier suggestion and keep net.internat (perhaps with a different name)? The energy expended flaming one another over this would be better used in hammering out an appropriate name for the group. I have yet to see any serious objections to the *content* of net.internat, only the *protocol* by which it was created. As a gesture of international diplomacy, I suggest the original creator of net.internat be given the (perhaps dubious) honor of recreating it (after removal if a name change is involved). How 'bout it?