Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!pesnta!amd!vecpyr!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!halbert%pbsvax.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM From: halbert%pbsvax.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM Newsgroups: net.ham-radio.packet Subject: What are the bugs in the TAPR TNC code? Message-ID: <338@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 10:23:43 EST Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.338 Posted: Thu Nov 7 10:23:43 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 11-Nov-85 06:11:17 EST Sender: daemon@mit-eddi.UUCP Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 6 From: halbert%pbsvax.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM (Dan Halbert HLO 2-3/M08 DTN 225-6305) Some people have recently mentioned that there are bugs in the TAPR TNC code. What are the more serious bugs that violate protocol? Are they the product of bad algorithm design, or are they just "oops"'s? --Dan, kb1rt