Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!harpo!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!duke!crm
From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sources
Subject: Re: As long as we are taliking about rmgrouping ...
Message-ID: <6531@duke.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Nov-85 13:23:06 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.6531
Posted: Fri Nov  1 13:23:06 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Nov-85 01:43:56 EST
References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <391@dsi1.UUCP>
Reply-To: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.news.group:4226 net.sources:3797

In article <391@dsi1.UUCP> ron@dsi1.UUCP (Ron Flax) writes:
>> I propose that we remove net.sources and only allow the posting of
>> sources in mod.sources.* for the following reasons:
>
>YOU MUST BE NUTS!!!!
>
>There is certainly more good than bad, and net.sources is one of the
>best reasons for even participating in Usenet at all.
>
I didn't have time to write my own flame, so I'll just second this
one:  leave net.sources the bloody alone!  I get all *sorts* of
goodies from it that aren't fancy enough for a moderated group.
-- 

			Charlie Martin
			(...mcnc!duke!crm)