Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site oakhill.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!oakhill!davet
From: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Parapsychology.
Message-ID: <565@oakhill.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 23:22:39 EST
Article-I.D.: oakhill.565
Posted: Thu Oct 24 23:22:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 31-Oct-85 05:41:27 EST
References: <970@decwrl.UUCP> <796@cybvax0.UUCP>
Reply-To: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel)
Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx
Lines: 20

In article <796@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
>> 
>> Glad to.  ....
>
>[Description of literature of >3000 papers omitted.]
>
>
>The fact is, there is NO demonstrable, reproducible psychic phenominon
>after who knows how many years of research.           ....
>

Um... Yea.  Out of all those >3000 papers there was absolutely NO PSI
documented.  And the greatest part is that Mike didn't have to look at any
of those 3000 papers to know that.

I guess that sums up the validy of ESP.  Mike's 'knowlege at a distance'
clairvoyance would seem the best proof of the validity of ESP seen yet in
this discussion.

  --  Dave Trissel      {seismo,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet