Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Re: Re: deviated septum surgery / Stoll's Dentistry. Message-ID: <832@psivax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Nov-85 15:05:44 EST Article-I.D.: psivax.832 Posted: Mon Nov 4 15:05:44 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 8-Nov-85 05:22:17 EST References: <4417@alice.UUCP> <2302@ukma.UUCP> <1973@aecom.UUCP> <2336@ukma.UUCP> Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA Lines: 42 In article <2336@ukma.UUCP> wws@ukma.UUCP (Bill Stoll) writes: >> >First: I made no "factual error" about cavities. >Second: I stand by the statement that "positive (outward) flow >through the microtubules can arrest decay of and even regenerate tooth >enamel". > >> To set the facts straight: Enamel is ground substance - it is >> extracellular. Microtubules are intracellular, ergo, enamel contains no >> microtubules. Two, microtubules are structures, not pipes, nothing flows >> through them, only along them , and then, only inside cells, >> it being very energy intensive. Three, enamel is made from the inside out >> by cells called ameloblasts. These are stripped away when the tooth erupts >> and no more enamel can ever be made. > > There are at least a >dozen observed phenomena that cannot be explained by Craig's paradigm; >all of which are explained by the newer theories I tried to share with >him in our "private correspondence". It seems he could not cope with >the new info. > As a scientist who is willing to adjust my models on the basis of real data, could you please provide more information. In particular: 1) What are these phenomena not explained by the std model? 2) What evidence is there for microtubules in teeth? 3) What evidence relates microtubular flow to enamel formation? >My question exactly. Who are you going to believe? I believe the evidence, I have seen none as yet. >regeneration of tooth enamel via microtubular flow was proven >10m >years ago when fluorescent antibody research could be combined with >radioactive tracer technology. References please! Also a summary of the results would be nice. -- Sarima (Stanley Friesen) UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa