Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!oliveb!hplabs!sri-unix!Cramer%CSL60%ti-csl.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
From: Cramer%CSL60%ti-csl.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Monkey Query
Message-ID: <705@sri-arpa.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 27-Oct-85 08:52:00 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.705
Posted: Sun Oct 27 08:52:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Nov-85 00:16:20 EST
Lines: 33

From:  Nichael 

In an effort to: 1] divert attention from the Newman Machine discussion
[which has gone on far too long] 2] reintroduce some actual [albeit
low-level] physics back into this bboard and 3] to get a satisfactory answer
[which I've never found], I'd like to introduce an old chestnut from my
undergraduate mechanics course.  [See diagram].

                             o
                            / \
                           |   |
                           |   |
                         o/|  /n\
                         ()|  |K|
                          \|  |g|
                           |   -

A [massless] Rope passes over a [frictionless, massless] Pulley.  On one side
is a Weight [n Kg].  On the other side, level with the Weight, is a Monkey, 
also weighing n Kg.  Both the Monkey and the Weight are initially at rest.  
The Monkey [as you might have guessed by now] starts climbing the Rope.  What
is the motion of the Weight [or for that matter, that of the Monkey]?

What if the Pulley is not frictionless?  What if the Rope is not massless?

Over the years I've seen at least FOUR different published solutions to this
problem [the monkey stays level as the weight rises, the weight stays level
as the monkey rises, the monkey and the weight rise at the same rate, and the
monkey rises and the weight LOWERS!!!].  Any takers??

						No clever signoff,
						Nichael
-------