Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site steinmetz.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ncr-sd!ncrcae!ncsu!uvacs!edison!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.UUCP (Davidsen) Newsgroups: net.micro.att Subject: Re: ATT 6300 PLUS Message-ID: <287@steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 19:49:30 EDT Article-I.D.: steinmet.287 Posted: Tue Oct 22 19:49:30 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 04:29:39 EDT References: <177@kodak.UUCP> <355@cbuxc.UUCP> Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.UUCP (Davidsen) Distribution: net.micro.att Organization: GE CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 10 I was a beta test site for the 6300+ and have found it to be compatible with everything I tested. The performance is better than a stoce AT, but not as good as one at, say, 8 Mz. Since the "new" AT supposedly will have a ROM limiting the system to 6Mz, this may be important. I also tested the Zenith Z200 with PCDOS, PC/IX and XENIX. All run. 8 Mz, no wait states, up to three hard disks. XENIX5.0 supposedly coming. Still a horse race here.