Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.news,net.micro.mac,net.news.group Subject: Re: Cleaning up net.sources.mac (mod.sources...) Message-ID: <434@graffiti.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Nov-85 07:46:57 EST Article-I.D.: graffiti.434 Posted: Mon Nov 11 07:46:57 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 13-Nov-85 07:49:07 EST References: <10674@ucbvax.ARPA> <536@felix.UUCP> <2920@sun.uucp> <660@leadsv.UUCP> <1754@gatech.CSNET> <232@rosevax.UUCP> Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 17 Xref: watmath net.news:4336 net.micro.mac:3410 net.news.group:4479 > objection that such posts are not source code. While there has been source > code posted to the group (and it is instructive if not actually useful), > transportability and frequent lack of the actual source make an encoded > executable the most practicle thing to post in many cases. Keep in mind > this group is for a one-lung micro, not a good-sized mini. I don't buy this. The IBM-PC is certainly no more of a computer (less of a micro) than the Mac, and there have been plenty of excellent sources in Turbo Pascal, 'C', and even Basic posted for it. There have also been a few binaries (ced.com.uu springs to mind), but at least the binaries have been uuencoded and uuencode source for UNIX has been posted to net.sources. If the IBM-PC can do it, why *NOT* the Mac? -- Name: Peter da Silva Graphic: `-_-' UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter