Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc6.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ir320 From: ir320@sdcc6.UUCP (ir320) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Dilema 2400 or speech Message-ID: <2264@sdcc6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-Oct-85 19:52:06 EDT Article-I.D.: sdcc6.2264 Posted: Thu Oct 24 19:52:06 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 07:28:20 EDT Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center Lines: 27 Keywords: USR 2400/ SB180 Mosart Well the saga continues: In this corner we have USR Courier 2400 ------------------------------------ $350 -------------------------- 300/1200/2400 baud Hayes Compatable Very intellegent Tone/Pulse And in this corner we have SB180 Mosart (Based on the XFC1203 chip) ----------------------------------- $350 --------------------------- 110/300/1200 baud Speech Synthasis on/off phone Tone/Pulse Tone/Pulse Decoding Voice Detection Call Progress How useful is 2400? How soon does one suspect 1200 will die out. Remember the 300/1200 switch. Look at the XFC 1203 chip in Nov. Byte. Nice chip! Will 2400 really provide future capability or are we still choosing a standard here. John Antypas UC San Diego uucp: ...!{sdchem,noscvax,bang,ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!sdcsvax!sdcc6!ir320 ...!{ihnp4,sdcsvax}!gwsd!man!wolf!u0236879 arpa: ir320%sdcc6@sdcsvax.ARPA sdcsvax!sdcc6!ir320@{Nosc,Berkeley} sdcsvax!gwsd!man!wolf!u0236879@{Nosc,Berkeley}