Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!think!mit-eddie!jbs From: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Re: Amiga MMU question Message-ID: <350@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 22:21:53 EST Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.350 Posted: Thu Nov 7 22:21:53 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Nov-85 05:51:40 EST References: <192@ucdavis.UUCP> <141@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <397@aum.UUCP> <436@mot.UUCP> Reply-To: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal) Distribution: net Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 21 In article <436@mot.UUCP> waycott@mot.UUCP (John Waycott) writes: >> >> > Multitasking does NOT require an MMU... >> > >> > Correctly written programs run without any problems, however. >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> I think that this statement should be shanged to "bug free" software should >> run without any problem.... ... >> they are usable in a professional scenario where a crash could do more harm >> than just annoy the user... > ... >using canned programs where the serious bugs have been removed. ======================================== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? How do you know that before your payroll (or A/R) file is corrupted by "that one last bug?" Jeff Siegal - MIT EECS