Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-bee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!mtunh!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!celeste
From: celeste@ssc-bee.UUCP (Celeste A Strahl)
Newsgroups: net.med,net.jokes
Subject: Re: A Pro-Smoking Article.
Message-ID: <421@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Nov-85 15:31:11 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-bee.421
Posted: Tue Nov 12 15:31:11 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:17:27 EST
References: <2043@aecom.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.med:2742 net.jokes:14894

> :-)
> [Some people have complained through both postings and letters that I have been
> coming down too hard on the health risks of smoking.  Well in the interests of
> fairness, I'd thought I'd present the following for all you smokers in the
> audience.] 

I am a true-blue non-smoker and I do NOT like your articles on smoking.

I have numerous physical reactions when I am around smoking, so I actively
work for a smoke-free work and home environment, but I find some of your
smoking articles offensive.  If there is a smoker out there that feels these
articles help him to quit smoking - continue to write them and I'll 'n' by them.
But if it offends some and doesn't help anyone - please quit.
Your other articles are usually very helpful and enjoyable to read.

-celeste