Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ius2.cs.cmu.edu
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ius2.cs.cmu.edu!ralphw
From: ralphw@ius2.cs.cmu.edu (Ralph Hyre)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.mac,net.legal
Subject: Re: Apple suing Jobs
Message-ID: <225@ius2.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 13:35:24 EST
Article-I.D.: ius2.225
Posted: Wed Oct 30 13:35:24 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:01:46 EST
References: <429@imsvax.UUCP> <438@looking.UUCP> <583@bonnie.UUCP>
Followup-To: net.legal
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.micro:12539 net.micro.mac:3215 net.legal:2518

In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes:

>Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs
>is in deep water with his actions.  The "Errors and Omissions"
>insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one!

I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at
Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no
day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says.
Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer
in absense of responsibilities?  (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer
until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case)
-- 
				- Ralph
Internet: ralphw@c.cs.cmu.edu (cmu-cs-c.arpa)
Usenet: ralphw@mit-eddie.uucp
Fidonet: Ralph Hyre at Fido #385 Pitt-Bull (or maybe Net 129, node 0)
Snail Mail: don't bother