Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!think!mit-eddie!nessus From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) Newsgroups: net.music Subject: Re: How could anyone be so blatantly inconsistent? Message-ID: <301@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 01:12:53 EST Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.301 Posted: Sun Nov 3 01:12:53 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 08:08:39 EST References: <1219@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 31 >> I dunno why people continue with these reviews like "I heard a Kate >> Bush song once and didn't think it was all that great". They are >> pretty pointless. > Doug Alan > The answer lies within. For not two days ago you yourself posted exactly > this kind of thing about the new Steve Morse album! Don't you remember? > Sheesh! > Dave Blickstein Sheesh! That was the point! Maybe *that*'s why I was so blatantly inconsistent? It was a totally rediculous review. I was trying to say, gee anyone can listen to one small piece of an artist's output for three minutes and make stupid comments about it being derivative or "nothing special" or boring or whatever. I guess people just don't appreciate satire anymore. Maybe I was being too subtle, but I thought it was quite "blatant". I'll try to be less subtle next time, but I don't know if it will work -- a whole bunch of people thought my article entitled "Volume" several months back was serious, and I can't imagine being any less subtle than that. "Running over the same old ground And how we found the same old fears" Doug Alan nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)