Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site usl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!usl!arh From: arh@usl.UUCP (Al the swamp-sailor) Newsgroups: net.arch Subject: Re: Anyone for net.compiler? Message-ID: <655@usl.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 17:03:22 EST Article-I.D.: usl.655 Posted: Wed Oct 30 17:03:22 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 04:13:25 EST References: <344@chalmers.UUCP> Reply-To: arh@usl.UUCP (Al the swamp-sailor) Organization: USL, Lafayette, LA Lines: 22 Keywords: language directed architectures In article <344@chalmers.UUCP> johnsson@chalmers.UUCP (Thomas Johnsson) writes: >> I've been ramblin, but I would like to see if there is interest in a >> newsgroup for compiler subjects(probably called net.compiler) that would >> cover the more "black magic" topics of register allocation, LR parser error >> recovery, Stack machine to non-stack machine mapping, etc... > >> Peter Barada >> {ihnp4!inmet|{harvard|cca}!ima}!pbear!peterb > > >Yes! Another vote for net.compiler! A lot of the discussions in both >net.arch and net.lang are really about compiler technology. I tend to disagree, folks. A lot of the discussions have been relevent insofar as they discuss items that are addressed in so-called 'language directed architectures'. Perhaps a better idea would be a net.arch subgroup.... say net.arch.langdir ? Al Hooton .... usl!arh arh@usl.UUCP