Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site lll-crg.ARpA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!booter
From: booter@lll-crg.ARpA (Elaine Richards)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Precision, Please
Message-ID: <951@lll-crg.ARpA>
Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 03:33:02 EST
Article-I.D.: lll-crg.951
Posted: Tue Oct 29 03:33:02 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Nov-85 00:19:45 EST
References: <1044@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: booter@lll-crg.UUCP (Elaine Richards)
Organization: Chocoholics Non-Anonymous
Lines: 29


How about using mathematical notation when describing groups of
people? A friend just tutored me in equivalence relations today.
Ex.
"Many men say blah blah blah"

Goes something like M={m e M ! said=(blah) cubed }

Forget it. I can't get notation out of this thing.

I just leafed through a lot of these as I just subscribed. Question...
why do so many men throw in their two cents? Kilts? Ties? Mensan in
the raw? Is it just a good sexual sounding board for non net.singles 
or do the men feel they will get an insight into how women think?
It amazes me how much men worry about how women think and how I
don't worry how men think. (People are relatively predictable - 
**BELIEVE IT OR NOT*)

Looks like we need a net.men or a net.sociology for many of the issues
raised. net.singles doesn't cover married folk, but has topics everyone
thinks about.

Its late B={booter e B! said (blah) cubed}
Gnight all....

booter
******

(Why bother addressing it, let your Vax do the walking....)