Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Kilts in polite society Message-ID: <4500041@ccvaxa> Date: Sun, 27-Oct-85 23:07:00 EST Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.4500041 Posted: Sun Oct 27 23:07:00 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 29-Oct-85 01:33:28 EST References: <4472@alice.UUCP> Lines: 19 Nf-ID: #R:alice.UUCP:-447200:ccvaxa:4500041:000:807 Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece Oct 27 22:07:00 1985 > It's kind of difficult to get a larger size when you're already wearing > the largest that most stores carry (you can go to a big men's shop, but > they have a smaller selection and often charge more). If you're neck is > disproportionately large, I would imagine that a shirt with the right > size collar would have sleaves that hang down to your knees. > Scott McEwan {ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan ---------- Well, the discussion started out talking about dress shirts (the sort you'd wear with a tie). Those generally come with separately specified collar and sleeve sizes. Let's bring this back to net.women by noting how unfair it is that women's clothes use single component sizes while men's generally have two component sizes... -- scott preece gould/csd - urbana ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece