Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site videovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!tekfdi!videovax!shuju
From: shuju@videovax.UUCP (Shuju Burgess)
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: A good AMAZING STORIES (at last!)
Message-ID: <1464@videovax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 13:37:17 EST
Article-I.D.: videovax.1464
Posted: Wed Oct 30 13:37:17 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 03:10:01 EST
References: <1329@mtgzz.UUCP> <658@petrus.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.movies:8272 net.sf-lovers:10901

> > Ok, I'll admit it.  I liked the AMAZING STORIES done on 10/27.
> 
> Me too. It was a good night for NBC; I also liked the Hitchcock episode
> that followed. You *knew* that she was going to get buried alive, but
> the *reason* was totally unexpected. I had assumed that the old man
> would find out he'd been tricked (or that he could really see all along)
> and would simply leave her there.
> 
> Phil

OK, if we're going to allow TV-talk in net.movies, I'll put in my $.02 too.
I've seen the new Hitchcock Presents 3 times, and all three times I had the
ending figured out about 15 minutes into the show, and this includes the
episode mentioned above.  I haven't seen any Amazing Stories except for the
first one, but it wasn't nearly as good as I had hoped.  Needless to say, I am
pretty disappointed at both of those shows.

Shu-Ju