Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site caip.RUTGERS.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!seismo!caip!jef From: jef@lbl-rtsg.arpa Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: net.sources.amiga Message-ID: <434@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 00:27:24 EST Article-I.D.: caip.434 Posted: Wed Nov 13 00:27:24 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:28:39 EST Sender: daemon@caip.RUTGERS.EDU Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 19 From: jef@lbl-rtsg.arpa There are three options: 1) talk in net.micro.amiga and sources in net.micro.amiga; 2) talk in net.micro.amiga and sources in net.sources; 3) talk in met.micro.amiga and sources in net.sources.amiga. I would just like to point out that if you Usenet folks decide on option 2, there will be no way to get the sources to us Internet folks. So please, either post sources here or create a net.sources.amiga, but DON'T put Amiga sources in net.sources. Anyway, what's the big deal about creating a new newsgroup? It's just another line in a file. We'll have the same amount of traffic either way. Or are newsgroups implemented in some totally brain-damaged fashion that I don't want to hear about? --- Jef