Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site videovax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!tekfdi!videovax!shuju From: shuju@videovax.UUCP (Shuju Burgess) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: A good AMAZING STORIES (at last!) Message-ID: <1464@videovax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Oct-85 13:37:17 EST Article-I.D.: videovax.1464 Posted: Wed Oct 30 13:37:17 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 03:10:01 EST References: <1329@mtgzz.UUCP> <658@petrus.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 18 Xref: watmath net.movies:8272 net.sf-lovers:10901 > > Ok, I'll admit it. I liked the AMAZING STORIES done on 10/27. > > Me too. It was a good night for NBC; I also liked the Hitchcock episode > that followed. You *knew* that she was going to get buried alive, but > the *reason* was totally unexpected. I had assumed that the old man > would find out he'd been tricked (or that he could really see all along) > and would simply leave her there. > > Phil OK, if we're going to allow TV-talk in net.movies, I'll put in my $.02 too. I've seen the new Hitchcock Presents 3 times, and all three times I had the ending figured out about 15 minutes into the show, and this includes the episode mentioned above. I haven't seen any Amazing Stories except for the first one, but it wasn't nearly as good as I had hoped. Needless to say, I am pretty disappointed at both of those shows. Shu-Ju