Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott
From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Colonel'K)
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Is English decaying rapidly?
Message-ID: <690@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 09:01:51 EST
Article-I.D.: hou2g.690
Posted: Tue Oct 29 09:01:51 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:40:50 EST
References: <162@opus.UUCP>
Organization: A Rent-Controlled Gothic Mansion
Lines: 28


>Then there's "comprise".  This word is so often misused that we might as
>well remove it from the language!  If you see the phrase "comprised of" in
>someone's writing, you can probably toss it off right away as pretentious,
>
>Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086

The following is from my Webster's (Ninth Collegiate), for your information:

	Although it has been in use *since the late 18th century*, sense 3
	[the definition to which Dick alludes] is still attacked as wrong.
	Why it has been singled out is not clear, but until comparatively
	recent times it was found chiefly in scientific or technical writing
	rather than belles lettres.  Our current evidence shows a slight
	shift in usage: sense 3 is somewhat more frequent in recent literary
	use than the earlier senses.  You should be aware, however, that if
	you use sense 3 you may be subject to criticism for doing so, and
	you may want to choose a safer synonym such as "compose" or "make up".

So I guess Dick is both right AND wrong!  Just goes to show you how the
language evolves...

				"Now see HERE!  I speak over 50 languages
				 fluently, but gibberish isn't one of them."

				Scott J. Berry
				ihnp4!hou2g!scott