Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-milo.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!gcc-milo!bird From: bird@gcc-milo.ARPA (Brian Wells) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Legality of Late Abortions (Roe V. Wade) Message-ID: <385@gcc-milo.ARPA> Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 19:07:02 EST Article-I.D.: gcc-milo.385 Posted: Thu Nov 7 19:07:02 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Nov-85 15:39:32 EST References: <1989@reed.UUCP> <367@cylixd.UUCP> <63@uscvax.UUCP> <64@uscvax.UUCP> <1028@bunker.UUCP> <1984@pyuxd.UUCP> Reply-To: bird@gcc-milo.UUCP (Brian Wells) Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma Lines: 23 Summary: Response to Rich Rosen In article <1984@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes: >(Odd that NO ONE responded to my article about the Arizona Supreme Court, and >the way their wording and use of the word "viable" makes clear the point of >demarcation of "lifehood" in terms of being a full fledged human being. Not >even Matt Rosenblatt...) >-- >"There! I've run rings 'round you logically!" >"Oh, intercourse the penguin!" Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr I saw nothing in that article that indicated they were defining the beginning of life. It seemed that they were only 'making a judgement' on when the life was 'meaningful' enough for the law to protect it. Brian Wells James 1:5 ______________________________________________________________________________ A further thought on birth control: In the previous discussions about birth control, I do not remember anyone suggesting that people should use more than one method simultaneously. This was what was taught in my schools when we discussed birth control. I would speculate that this could for all practical purposes eliminate accidental pregnancy. ______________________________________________________________________________