Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 Unisoft-Cosmos; site kepler.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!well!micropro!kepler!mojo
From: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: What happens when posting to the new mod.* groups
Message-ID: <356@kepler.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Nov-85 00:44:19 EST
Article-I.D.: kepler.356
Posted: Tue Nov 12 00:44:19 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 13-Nov-85 20:43:17 EST
References: <338@kepler.UUCP> <634@Glacier.ARPA> <1929@gatech.CSNET>
Reply-To: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones)
Distribution: na
Organization: MicroPro Int'l Corp., San Rafael, CA
Lines: 24

In article <1929@gatech.CSNET> spaf@gatech.UUCP (Gene Spafford) writes:
>If anybody would bother to read the "moderators" and "active lists"
>articles I post to mod.newslists and net.announce.newusers they would
>see that I describe:  1) what happens when you try to post to a "mod"
>group; and,  2) that some mod groups are simply mail reflectors with no
>moderator.

Gene, I knew what to expect when I posted my test to mod.protocols.appletalk.

The point of my posting here is that THESE GROUPS ARE NOT MODERATED.

It amazes me that Erik was such a stickler for accurate naming of the groups
while continuing to call them mod groups.  They aren't moderated.

Now I like the arrangement of these groups.  But I think there should be
a moderator controlling the gateway between the mailing list and USENET.

Suggestion:  Get moderators for the new groups, located at a gateway site.

-- 
Mojo
... Morris Jones, MicroPro Product Development
{ptsfa,hplabs,glacier,lll-crg}!well!micropro!kepler!mojo
               {ucbvax,decwrl}!dual!micropro!kepler!mojo