Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dicomed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!oliveb!hplabs!qantel!ihnp4!dicomed!stryker
From: stryker@dicomed.UUCP (d. j. stryker)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Did anyone understand PLENTY? (sort of a little spoiler)
Message-ID: <644@dicomed.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 11:14:36 EST
Article-I.D.: dicomed.644
Posted: Fri Nov  8 11:14:36 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 01:16:49 EST
References: <805@asgb.UUCP> <1536@cae780.UUCP>
Reply-To: stryker@dicomed.UUCP (d. j. stryker)
Distribution: na
Organization: DICOMED Corp., Minneapolis
Lines: 15

In article <1536@cae780.UUCP> alan@cae780.UUCP (Alan M. Steinberg) writes:
>>I just saw Meryl Streep's latest: "PLENTY".  I feel frustrated and like
>>I've missed something along the way, but the whole show seemed to drag 
>>along... I was left with a feeling of "What was the point?"  
>
>-- 
>					Alan Steinberg

	I thought the 'point' was to create a role for Meryl Streep.  If there
	were good qualities in this flick I missed them too.  The characters 
	had nothing to do with any reality I've ever come in contact with. 
	And Meryl Streep ought to go to passion school or meet an Italian lover
	or something.  She's got about as much life in her as a bowl of oatmeal.
							
										still yawning--- don