Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp 1.2 08/01/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!hp-pcd!bill
From: bill@hp-pcd.UUCP (bill)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Re: Jagged Edge spoiler
Message-ID: <15700003@hpcvlo.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Oct-85 18:26:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hpcvlo.15700003
Posted: Mon Oct 28 18:26:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Nov-85 07:37:06 EST
References: <211@vi.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Corvallis, OR
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:vi:-21100:hpcvlo:15700003:000:818
Nf-From: hpcvlo!bill    Oct 28 15:26:00 1985


Even though he could not be tried again for his wife's murder, do you
really think the guy would just sit back knowing that his attorney knew
he was guilty and could potentially make public that knowledge.  Sure,
he wouldn't go to jail for the same crime, but how long would he last
in the community if word got out that the trial was a farce and that
Jeff Bridges was the killer.  The falsely-accused tennis pro was still
on the loose, so why not take advantage of it and make the attorney's
murder look like just one more of the other guy's crimes?  After all,
wouldn't the tennis pro feel a little like getting even with her, too?

I don't know, though, if she'd make it known that the trial came out
wrong.  It'd be a terrific blow to her never-lost-a-case-never-been-wrong
court career.

bill frolik
hp-pcd!bill