Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!gatech!amdcad!jimb
From: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.micro.mac,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Cleaning up net.sources.mac (mod.sources...)
Message-ID: <6182@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Nov-85 11:59:51 EST
Article-I.D.: amdcad.6182
Posted: Tue Nov 12 11:59:51 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 13-Nov-85 04:00:45 EST
References: <10674@ucbvax.ARPA> <536@felix.UUCP> <2920@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 22
Xref: linus net.news:3537 net.micro.mac:3378 net.news.group:3806

In article <434@graffiti.UUCP> peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
>I don't buy this. The IBM-PC is certainly no more of a computer (less of a
>micro) than the Mac, and there have been plenty of excellent sources in
>Turbo Pascal, 'C', and even Basic posted for it. There have also been a
>few binaries (ced.com.uu springs to mind), but at least the binaries have
>been uuencoded and uuencode source for UNIX has been posted to net.sources.
>If the IBM-PC can do it, why *NOT* the Mac?

I don't understand this.  What is the importance of uuencode in the discussion.
Binhex is used for the mac, and an excellent decoder of binhex was posted
to the net. (xbin). In source.
-- 
 Jim Budler
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
 (408) 749-5806
 Usenet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amdcad!jimb
 Compuserve:	72415,1200

Bogus newsgroup: net.news: Move to end of .newsrc[yn^L]?

Don't be dictators, use thought.