Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Re: (micromotives & macrobehavior)
Message-ID: <805@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 00:33:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.805
Posted: Tue Oct 22 00:33:18 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 07:32:33 EDT
References: <3476@topaz.UUCP> <28200078@inmet.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 21

In article <283@graffiti.UUCP> peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>> >1916      Famine in China (Capitalist?)
>> 	Imperialistic, not capitalistic(in fact Nationalist China is
>> still not a captalistic country)
>
>I've heard of imperialistic social structures, but this is the first I
>have heard of an imperialist economic structure. How does it work?

	Oh, all right! So I wasn't very precise! Actually what I was
trying to imply was a centralized command economy based on government
authority, without any clear philosophy. What I have since called a
Statist economy.
	However, it seems I was wrong, and it was actually a variant
feudal economy. I was mislead by assuming that Chiang Kai Chek's
Nationalist government was already in power at that time.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa