Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 5/22/85; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!fohl From: fohl@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Fohl) Newsgroups: net.med,net.jokes Subject: Re: A Pro-Smoking Article. Message-ID: <1608@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 12:01:56 EST Article-I.D.: cbosgd.1608 Posted: Wed Nov 13 12:01:56 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Nov-85 07:20:45 EST References: <2043@aecom.UUCP> <421@ssc-bee.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Oh Lines: 25 Xref: watmath net.med:2743 net.jokes:14895 Summary: RE: SMoking Article In article <421@ssc-bee.UUCP>, celeste@ssc-bee.UUCP (Celeste A Strahl) writes: > > :-) > > [Some people have complained through both postings and letters that I have been > > coming down too hard on the health risks of smoking. Well in the interests of > > fairness, I'd thought I'd present the following for all you smokers in the > > audience.] > > I am a true-blue non-smoker and I do NOT like your articles on smoking. > I find some of your > smoking articles offensive. > > -celeste celeste, are you another STella? Bitching about a smoking article?? Really, now. If you're that hung up about it, I suggest counselling. I'm not a smoker (and yes, I am a reformed smoker), but I grant people their right to at least discuss it. Becoming ill in the presence of tobacco smoke is one thing, but reacting to the mere mention can't be physical. By the way, keep that sort of thing out of jokes and into jokes.d, please. Fohl