Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 5/22/85; site cbosgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!db
From: db@cbosgd.UUCP (J. Muir)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.internat
Message-ID: <1570@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 25-Oct-85 20:46:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbosgd.1570
Posted: Fri Oct 25 20:46:28 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 08:25:05 EDT
Reply-To: db@cbosgd.UUCP (J. Muir)
Organization: The Bohemian Grove
Lines: 13

Why don't y'all just follow the earlier suggestion and keep
net.internat (perhaps with a different name)?  The energy
expended flaming one another over this would be better used
in hammering out an appropriate name for the group.

I have yet to see any serious objections to the *content* of
net.internat, only the *protocol* by which it was created.

As a gesture of international diplomacy, I suggest the original
creator of net.internat be given the (perhaps dubious) honor
of recreating it (after removal if a name change is involved).

How 'bout it?