Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!think!mit-eddie!jbs
From: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Re: Amiga MMU question
Message-ID: <350@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Nov-85 22:21:53 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.350
Posted: Thu Nov  7 22:21:53 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Nov-85 05:51:40 EST
References: <192@ucdavis.UUCP> <141@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <397@aum.UUCP> <436@mot.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Distribution: net
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 21

In article <436@mot.UUCP> waycott@mot.UUCP (John Waycott) writes:
>> 
>> > Multitasking does NOT require an MMU...
>> > 
>> > Correctly written programs run without any problems, however.
>>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> I think that this statement should be shanged to "bug free" software should
>> run without any problem....
...
>> they are usable in a professional scenario where a crash could do more harm
>> than just annoy the user...
>
...
>using canned programs where the serious bugs have been removed.
                       ========================================
                          ?    ?     ?     ?     ?     ?    ?

How do you know that before your payroll (or A/R) file is corrupted by
"that one last bug?"

Jeff Siegal - MIT EECS