Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site kestrel.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!Glacier!kestrel!ttp From: ttp@kestrel.ARPA Newsgroups: net.books Subject: Re: Wu and Fabricant, man in the rubble, etc. Message-ID: <2245@kestrel.ARPA> Date: Mon, 28-Oct-85 00:32:34 EST Article-I.D.: kestrel.2245 Posted: Mon Oct 28 00:32:34 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:13:47 EST References: <392@bocklin.UUCP> <1162@sdcsvax.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA Lines: 8 Summary: why are sf reviews in net.books I'm not sure what the guide-lines are for net.books, but why is it necessary to see reviews of Science Fiction books in net.books, if the same review already appears in net.SF? I'd rather not see SF reviews in net.books. Nothing against SF in particular, it just seems redundant. -tom