Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site steinmetz.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ncr-sd!ncrcae!ncsu!uvacs!edison!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.UUCP (Davidsen)
Newsgroups: net.micro.att
Subject: Re: ATT 6300 PLUS
Message-ID: <287@steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 19:49:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: steinmet.287
Posted: Tue Oct 22 19:49:30 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 04:29:39 EDT
References: <177@kodak.UUCP> <355@cbuxc.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.UUCP (Davidsen)
Distribution: net.micro.att
Organization: GE CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 10


I was a beta test site for the 6300+ and have found it to be compatible with
everything I tested. The performance is better than a stoce AT, but not as
good as one at, say, 8 Mz. Since the "new" AT supposedly will have a ROM
limiting the system to 6Mz, this may be important.

I also tested the Zenith Z200 with PCDOS, PC/IX and XENIX. All run. 8 Mz, no
wait states, up to three hard disks. XENIX5.0 supposedly coming.

Still a horse race here.