Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucdavis!ccrdave
From: ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: The next Star Trek Movie???
Message-ID: <201@ucdavis.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 00:30:05 EST
Article-I.D.: ucdavis.201
Posted: Tue Oct 29 00:30:05 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Oct-85 06:12:00 EST
References: <213@astroatc.UUCP>
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 25

> In article <187@ur-tut.UUCP> scco@ur-tut.UUCP (Sean Colbath) writes:
> >responsable for the travesty performed on the Klingons in the movies?
> >Those costumes are hidious!!!  The series depiction was much better..
> 
> First: I quite agree!!!!!!!!!!!! (They were *Supposed* to be EVIL and
> 	sinistar!!)  They were *COMICAL*, and that did NOT fit

The costumes were pretty dumb looking.  We're considering a libel suit.
But, let's face it, they called the ship in III a "Bird of Prey", 
Which leads us to the next point...

> Personally, I think the sieries authors didn't know the difference
> between Romulans and Klingons.

Kirk sure doesn't.  In his opening lines in II, he says that Klingons
never take prisoners.

1) He'd been a Klingon prisoner.  (Captain Kang, Day of the Dove)

2) The incident was in Romulan space.  Why bring Klingons into the
picture?

> UUCP:	... {seismo | harvard | ihnp4} !uwvax!astroatc!johnw

			Lord Kahless