Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.news.notes
Subject: Re: Information Overload and What We Can Do About It
Message-ID: <3188@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 01:46:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.3188
Posted: Sun Sep 29 01:46:31 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Sep-85 01:21:36 EDT
References: <10381@ucbvax.ARPA> <3274@nsc.UUCP> <698@tpvax.fluke.UUCP> <251@graffiti.UUCP>
Reply-To: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Organization: Ninja Ewok Training Grounds
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.news:3991 net.news.notes:24

In article <251@graffiti.UUCP> peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Chuq:
>
>	Your required keyword *is* a newsgroup.

Well, yes and no. Required keywords allows you the utility of the newsgroup
setup without it getting in your way. Keywords can be implemented a LOT
more flexibly and be a lot more dynamic (if you want to start a new group,
simply use a required keyword of 'misc' and some set of defining keywords,
and if the keywords come into general usage allow them to migrate to the
rquired set. If a keyword goes out of favor, take it off the required
list...) than a newsgroup. Moving to keywords also allows us to
disassociate ourselves from the newsgroup as a place holder -- the subject
should be the place holder and the keywords filtering and selection
mechanisms. They do many things the same, but semantically they are much
different.

chuq
-- 
:From under the bar at Callahan's:   Chuq Von Rospach 
nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA               {decwrl,hplabs,ihnp4,pyramid}!nsc!chuqui

If you can't talk below a bellow, you can't talk...