Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site pid.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!pid!pwd From: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Another Amiga reaction Message-ID: <192@pid.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Sep-85 06:10:35 EDT Article-I.D.: pid.192 Posted: Thu Sep 26 06:10:35 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 06:59:08 EDT References: <4353@alice.UUCP> Reply-To: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple) Organization: P & I Design, Inc. Atlanta Lines: 22 Summary: In article <4353@alice.UUCP> aer@alice.UucP (y) writes: > >As for interlaced (400 pixel vertical resolution) graphics (on the Amiga >monitor) ...well... trash it. It looked as if we were looking at the otherwise >amazing digitized 640x400 mandrill through a filter of bubbly ginger ale. >The flicker was badawfulyuckterrible. I hope that was only the monitor in >bad shape. I hope. Anyone able to reply to that? > I saw the Amiga in the the offices of Amiga here in Atlanta Including a MacPaint like program (the one the person demoing had a real handle on) the software looked to me to be faster than MacPaint (but this was nether a side by side demo nor do the packages have the same "commands" [BTW what are the things you do with a mouse]). The monitor looked very good to me for a $3000 system . > > -- Philip Dalrymple akgua!pid!pwd 404/429-8266 (voice)