Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!eichelbe@nadc.ARPA
From: eichelbe@nadc.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Possible future problems?: c partition
Message-ID: <1564@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 09:47:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1564
Posted: Wed Sep 18 09:47:43 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Sep-85 06:29:40 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 20

---
>Date: Fri, 13 Sep 85 12:55:02 pdt
>From: niel <@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA,@ucsc.csnet (Niel Warren):niel@ucsc.csnet>
>To: eichelbe@NADC.ARPA, unix-wizards@BRL.ARPA
>Subject: Re:  swapon problem
>
>About that c partition... c accesses the whole disk including 
>the space reserved bad blocks. 
>
>-Niel
>
>
---
Wizards:  Is this really true?  Am I playing with fire by having a c partition
on a CDC 9766 (like an RM05) controlled by an SI 9400 controller?  I'm
interested in the c partition part, not in flames about the 9766 or SI.
I'm running under VAX 4.1 BSD UNIX.

Jon Eichelberger
eichelbe@NADC