Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site laidbak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!laidbak!jeq
From: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: How net.personals would work
Message-ID: <217@laidbak.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Sep-85 23:27:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: laidbak.217
Posted: Sun Sep 22 23:27:38 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Sep-85 03:12:39 EDT
References: <3850024@csd2.UUCP> <211@laidbak.UUCP> <675@adobe.UUCP> <3591@dartvax.UUCP> <142@denelvx.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Distribution: net
Organization: LAI Chicago
Lines: 29

verbatim from another posting:

In article <3591@dartvax.UUCP> nadya@dartvax (Nadya M. Labib) writes:
> In article <675@adobe.UUCP> greid@adobe.UUCP (Glenn Reid) writes:
> >In article <211@laidbak.UUCP> jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
> >
> >The reason net.personals is such a good idea is that nobody has to go through
> >anybody else (like a moderator) to get "set up" with some dream-body.
> >
> >The reason it is such a bad idea is that nobody will post to it, because
> >nobody wants to be made a fool of on the net, and because it is ridiculous to
> >have somebody moderate something like this.
> 
> Who is going to be made a fool of?  Probably someone who has a phobia about
> being open and free.  You sound too uptight.  Maybe you need a vacation?
>  
> This isn't net.flame you know.

Yeah...what she said.  This isn't net.flame, you know.  Noone has ever been
flamed outside of net.flame.  Noone on this network has *ever* been attacked

(etc., etc.)====end of quote

Please check your indentations and attributions.
NONE of the above quotes were mine, how did I get in here?

Jonathan E. Quist
ihnp4!laidbak!jeq
``I deny this is a disclaimer.''