Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site meccts.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!rosevax!dicomed!meccts!ahby
From: ahby@meccts.UUCP (Shane P. McCarron)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: time to remove net.bizarre
Message-ID: <224@meccts.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Sep-85 18:34:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: meccts.224
Posted: Wed Sep 11 18:34:55 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 11:45:43 EDT
References: <1969@amdahl.UUCP> <688@cyb-eng.UUCP>
Reply-To: ahby@meccts.UUCP (Shane P. McCarron)
Organization: MECC Technical Services, St.Paul, MN
Lines: 23
Summary: 

In article <688@cyb-eng.UUCP> howard@cyb-eng.UUCP (Howard Johnson) writes:
>> Are there really any of its original supporters who still feel
>> it is worth keeping around?
>
>While I wasn't quite an original supporter (accepter would be more
>appropriate), I don't see much value in it now.

I wasn't an original supporter... I'm not even a current supporter,
but it seems to me that the rules say  a group will be removed
when its traffic becomes so low that it is no longer necessary.  Is
net.bizzares traffic low?  I don't think so, but I haven't checked
lately.

For the people who are being heavy-handed about this group, the real
issue is:  would you like a group you cared about to be attacked in
this way?  I certainly wouldn't!

-- 

Shane P. McCarron
Minnesota Educational Computing Corporation - Technical Services

UUCP	ihnp4!dicomed!meccts!ahby