Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!proper!elric
From: elric@proper.UUCP (elric)
Newsgroups: net.kids,net.legal,net.politics
Subject: Re: corporal punishment in schools
Message-ID: <304@proper.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 23:18:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: proper.304
Posted: Wed Sep 18 23:18:10 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Sep-85 05:25:58 EDT
References: <2149T3B@psuvm> <658@rduxb.UUCP> <1214@teddy.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: elric@proper.UUCP (Elric of Imrryr)
Organization: Lunatic Laboratories Unltd.
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.kids:2057 net.legal:2362 net.politics:11072

In article <> fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) writes:
>>	Discipline based on fear is worse than no discipline at all.
>
>How did you arrive at this conclusion?  School children have been
>disciplined with fear for generations.  It didn't do much for their
>creativity, but they did learn the basic skills.  With no discipline,
>students learn nothing at all.
>
>	Frank Silbermann

 The main problem with discipline by fear is that once a child is removed from
such an atomosphere and he has nothing to fear he will see no reason to follow
the rules.
 I spent 4 years in a catholic school which used corporal punishment (for
everything from not having having a perfectly made bed, to singing off key
in music class).
  Once I got into a high school which did not use corporal punishment I just
goofed off.
  In this country police can not legally beat a criminal unless the crook is
trying to beat them.
The crimes of kids in school rarely wrose then that of a real crimenal.
  Fear is a double edged sword, you can only push someone so far, before he
strikes back.
   Elric of Imrryr
Disclamer--
 The above veiws are of no concern to Lunatic Labs