Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!sun!guy
From: guy@sun.uucp (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: arrays, anyone?
Message-ID: <2800@sun.uucp>
Date: Sun, 15-Sep-85 19:20:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.2800
Posted: Sun Sep 15 19:20:20 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Sep-85 00:27:56 EDT
References: <390@ur-helheim.UUCP> <2748@sun.uucp> <277@cisden.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 16

> >Now, to reference A(10,100):
> >
> >	(*a)[99][9];

> WRONG!
> Declaring an array [99] means the valid values are from 0 -> 98 .
> See K&R page 20.

WRONG!  The above code fragment is a reference, not a declaration (the word
"reference" in the first sentence might give you a clue here).  If you check
the original article, you'll notice that the array was declared as having
more than 99 rows and having more than 9 elements in each row.  As such, the
valid subscript values definitely include 99 for the first subscript and 9
for the second.

	Guy Harris