Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!DRF@SU-SCORE.ARPA
From: DRF@SU-SCORE.ARPA (David Fuchs)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Any C compilers that produce assembly language?
Message-ID: <1764@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 02:16:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1764
Posted: Fri Sep 27 02:16:43 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Oct-85 10:14:43 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 10

Sorry, Pat, but I put 20,000 lines of code through Microsoft C version
3 using the /Fa switch, and it produces a total disaster area that
MASM 3 complained about in THOUSANDS of error messages.  On inspection,
it was clear that there were at least a half dozen systematic errors
in the assembly code.  Good grief, the SEGMENT statements didn't even
match the ENDS statements!  Multiple labels galore, too.  Interestingly,
the direct-to-OBJ-file code was all just fine; only the ASM stuff had
ridiculous boo-boos in it.
	-david
-------