Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!josh
From: josh@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (J Storrs Hall)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: (micromotives & macrobehavior)
Message-ID: <3689@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 14:48:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3689
Posted: Wed Sep 18 14:48:27 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Sep-85 11:15:09 EDT
Reply-To: josh@topaz.UUCP (J Storrs Hall)
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 20

In article <761@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
>Great.  Your brilliant working scheme sucessfully killed a platoon.
>The whole rest of libertaria has been conquored, and you are surrounded.

Great.  Your grandiose world-conquering plan has been defeated by an
uneasy Alliance of nations which don't even like each other, and you
shoot yourself while your wife of an hour takes poison.  You see, 
anybody can dream up bad situations and rhetorically place the other
fellow in them...

>> I'd personally favor an assassination defense...

>... YOU are even more vulnerable, because of the openess of your society.
>Mike Huybensz

Exactly wrong, because a market doesn't have a leader.  The whole point
of this discussion is to compare a rigid command hierarchy to a 
decentralized, self-organizing market system.

--JoSH