Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott
From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Racer X)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Astrology
Message-ID: <635@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 16:38:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou2g.635
Posted: Tue Sep 17 16:38:10 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 05:09:39 EDT
References: <2178@iddic.UUCP>
Organization: The Finish Line
Lines: 21



>I'm not convinced that astrology is totally bogus. I don't mean the
>astrology you get on the comic page. I mean the idea that a person's
>life, health, and personality are (to whatever extent) influenced by the
>exact time and place of his/her birth. Any astrology buffs/debunkers
>out there care to comment?
>
>Kendall Auel


Sure.  Why does the time and/or place of birth have anything to
do with it?  Why not the time of conception?  Why not 5 months
and 17 days into the pregnancy?  Do women have labor induced so
that their child will have a more favorable horoscope?

Not that these are the only questions, of course, just "pet peeves"
of mine.

			SJBerry