Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pegasus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!pegasus!mzal
From: mzal@pegasus.UUCP (Mike Zaleski)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: I break for(;;) loops
Message-ID: <2618@pegasus.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 14:56:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: pegasus.2618
Posted: Thu Oct  3 14:56:43 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 06:16:01 EDT
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Lincroft NJ
Lines: 10

> Some of us feel the same about breaks as we do about gotos. I won't use
> it, or continue either, and I won't let anyone in my shop use it. It is
> just a goto with an implicit label, and destroys the ability to
> determine program flow from the FORM of the source...

I guess this means you don't use the switch statement either.
Not that you can't live without it, but it can be useful at times.
Without a break, a switch statement is kind of unwieldly.

-- Mike^Z   Zaleski@Rutgers   [ allegra!, ihnp4! ] pegasus!mzal