Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!amd!vecpyr!lll-crg!mordor!ut-sally!utastro!anand
From: anand@utastro.UUCP (Anand Sivaramakrishnan)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Problem of many bodies
Message-ID: <769@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 01:12:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: utastro.769
Posted: Mon Sep 30 01:12:29 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 04:16:04 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 32


Some answers to some questions...

<    1.	Why is the three- or many-bodied problem unsolvable? 

We cannot find enough independent functions that are 'constants of
motion' (eg. components of momentum, angular momentum, energy etc).
That's why the more-than-two body problem is 'insoluble' (not integrable).

<    2.	Do the three-body problems apply for systems where the mass of
<	one of the bodies is vanishingly small compared to the others
<	(such as in a Voyager/Jupiter/Sun system)?

Yes, indeed.... the motion of the third, light body is not integrable.
By the way (looky here, Ethan!), the solution of such problems as perturbation
problems is only valid for some of the possible orbits of the third (light)
body. There are many cases where these perturbation theories break down
very rapidly (a few orbits, even). Perturbation theories are usually
good for the periodic sorts of orbits one finds in the solar system.



<    4.	Is the solution to all this merely one of computational 
<	fortitude?

No. JPL has made the approximations less approximate, as the original poster
guessed.

< AN ensuing discussion might be of value, unless the answer is really
< very simple and obvious, which it does not seem to be.

< Dick Pierce