Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!teddy!jpn From: jpn@teddy.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: USENET and Compuserve Message-ID: <1358@teddy.UUCP> Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 14:01:55 EDT Article-I.D.: teddy.1358 Posted: Mon Sep 30 14:01:55 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 11:17:15 EDT References: <136@cithep.UucP> Reply-To: jpn@teddy.UUCP (John P. Nelson) Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass. Lines: 15 >I don't know how many poeple Compuserve has, but the forums ( sort of like >newgroups on USENET ) that I read on compuserve have a lot more traffic than >the corresponding newgroups on USENET, and do not have a problem with >lots of junk. I do not know exactly why this is so, but if someone could >discover why, maybe it could be applied to USENET. There are two reasons why Compuserve has a much lower noise level. 1. If you are being charged by the minute, you thing twice about wasting time by posting a long-winded or useless article. 2. Compuserve has MODERATORS!!! They are PAID to police their own forum. They are actually paid proportionally to the amount of traffic the forum has, so it is in their own interest to improve the quality of the traffic!