Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site teklds.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!hankb From: hankb@teklds.UUCP (Hank Buurman) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: The Dworkin Referendum Message-ID: <1095@teklds.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 20:44:33 EDT Article-I.D.: teklds.1095 Posted: Wed Oct 2 20:44:33 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 06:22:19 EDT References: <248@ssc-vax.UUCP> <3641@dartvax.UUCP> Reply-To: hankb@teklds.UUCP (Hank Buurman) Distribution: net Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 24 In article <3641@dartvax.UUCP> dnc@dartvax.UUCP (David Crespo) writes: > > >speqking of porn and rape, how do netters feel aobout the upcoming >Dworkin-?? referendum coming up in cambridge. ? I am going to >probably try and type an intersesting pro-con artiicle in >this (OCT>) month's SOJOURNER on it (if I can slot the time in >a reasonable time) but all of you experts must surely be aware of >what is going down or coming up. (as it were) . The list of people involved >heralds some of the most influential names in feminism, >but I'll get to that when I type the article (which is >long, so bear with me). The issue ist seems is hittin >the streets much sooner han than you think. And what the >article does manage to do is point out some of angle >(sociological and other) that most of us are too timid or >inarticulate to present. The relationshi[p of this to >broader issues, and inner conflicts within zee moovement, is > very interesting indeed...be forewarned Is this an alien language? Or am I too new to recognize net.slang? Hank Buurman tektronix!dadla!hankb