Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!broome
From: broome@ucbvax.ARPA (Jonathan C. Broome)
Newsgroups: net.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: Possible bug in "rman".
Message-ID: <10481@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 14:18:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.10481
Posted: Fri Sep 27 14:18:34 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 08:43:59 EDT
References: <150@bubba.UUCP>
Reply-To: broome@ucbvax.UUCP (Jonathan C. Broome)
Distribution: net
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 15

In article <150@bubba.UUCP> gj@bubba.UUCP writes:
>Is the sense of the '-k' and '-f' flags in 'rman' reversed with respect
>to 'man' or am I missing something?

They're right as far as I can tell, at least compared to the standard Berkeley
'man'.  The '-f ' flag in man is the same as 'apropos', and the '-k' is the
same as 'whatis'.  If you get these confused, just use the '-a' and '-w' flags
to rman, they're easier to remember (that's why I added them).

===========================================================
Jonathan C. Broome       University of California, Berkeley

          UUCP    ...!ucbvax!broome
          ARPA    broome@ucbvax.ARPA 
===========================================================