Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!mcewan
From: mcewan@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: banning pornography
Message-ID: <40400021@uiucdcs>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 13:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.40400021
Posted: Mon Sep 30 13:19:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:10:22 EDT
References: <885@ptsfa.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:ptsfa.UUCP:-88500:uiucdcs:40400021:000:743
Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!mcewan    Sep 30 12:19:00 1985


>   The idea of free speech
> is silly to me.  Would you think it was reasonable for someone to start
> telling hundreds of people that YOU personally should be killed?  Deny
> them the right to do this and you deny them free speech.  But allow them
> to do this and there is a legal way to murder.  Which do you choose?  To
> me the choice is obvious.  Any reasonable society has to put limits on
> so-called "free speech".

Would you kill someone because I told you to? If you did, do you think I should
be charged with the killing?

			Scott McEwan
			{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan

"I know what you are. Nut. Screwball. Flake. Lunatic. Fruitcake.
 Bats in the attic. Psycho. All your dogs aren't barking."

"Are too! Are too! Woof! Woof!"