Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc3.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdcc3!ewa
From: ewa@sdcc3.UUCP (Eric Anderson)
Newsgroups: net.music.synth
Subject: Fostex 4-track decks
Message-ID: <3000@sdcc3.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 21:02:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcc3.3000
Posted: Wed Sep 18 21:02:22 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Sep-85 00:34:24 EDT
Reply-To: ewa@sdcc3.UUCP (Eric Anderson)
Distribution: net
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 11
Keywords: multi-track fostex
Summary: are they any good?


I've heard a lot of negative comments about Fostex equipment on the net
lately, but here in San Diego Fostex is about the only brand of 4-track
recording deck available. The simple (mod 15 or something) one is going
for $339 at the moment which sounds good.

The question is: What is it about Fostex that you do/don't like about the
unit? How is it better/worse than a Tascam deck? Does anyone else make any
similar equipment that I should consider?

Eric Anderson, UC San Diego {elsewhere}!ihnp4!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc3!ewa