Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site deepthot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!psddevl!deepthot!zaphod
From: zaphod@deepthot.UUCP (Lance Bailey)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: handwriting
Message-ID: <653@deepthot.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Sep-85 10:50:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: deepthot.653
Posted: Thu Sep 26 10:50:44 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Sep-85 10:23:45 EDT
Organization: UWO CS, London Canada
Lines: 19

I've only been reading net.women for a few months so this might be a rehash....


	Why does it SEEM to be a standard rule that the handwriting of women
is far superiour to that of men?  While a women'n writing is usually quite
elegant with lovely rounded characters, the scrawl from men's pens is usually
illegible. Stranger still, while I know of men with "better than average"
script, I really can't think of any women who get complaints about their
handwriting.
-- 
      4     222
   4  4    2   2
   4  4        2            would  you say that  this is a  result of
   44444     22             the  "do-it if it feels good" generation?
      4     2                     -- i've got five bucks riding on it
      4    2
      4    22222
                               decvax!{utzoo|watmath}!deepthot!zaphod
                       (Lance Bailey @ UWO  Comp Sci, London, Canada)