Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!agb
From: agb@reed.UUCP (Alexander G. Burchell)
Newsgroups: net.works,net.lang.st80
Subject: Info wanted on Smalltalk implementations
Message-ID: <1948@reed.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 20:05:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: reed.1948
Posted: Mon Sep 30 20:05:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 3-Oct-85 03:48:35 EDT
Reply-To: agb@reed.UUCP (Alexander G. Burchell)
Organization: Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria
Lines: 28
Keywords: smalltalk workstation macintosh lisa dorado xerox sun
Xref: watmath net.works:1142 net.lang.st80:271

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR SMALLTALK ***

Hi NetLanders --

	I am looking for information about the various Smalltalk
implementations that exist.  I am interested in the "low-cost"
workstations/PCs that run Smalltalk (a contradiction in terms?).
My previous ST experience has been with a SUN-2 running Berkeley
Smalltalk-80, and that was (almost) fast enough for me, so I don't
really need info on dorados,etc.

	I am specifically interested in the the Tektronix Smalltalk
machine(s), the low-end XEROX machines, Apple Macintosh/Lisa implementations,
SUN implementations (I heard a rumor that somone at XEROX wrote a ST
application in 68000 asm for the SUN that was *much* faster than Berkeley
ST, does anyone know anything about that), etc.

	Please mail me your replies and I will be happy to summarize to the
net if there is interest.

				Thanks in Advance,
					
						Alex Burchell
						
UUCP:	..!{decvax,ucbvax,hplabs,ihnp4,zehntel}!tektronix!reed!agb
ARPA:	I wish.

( Where's the fish? )