Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttidcc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!ttidca!ttidcc!regard
From: regard@ttidcc.UUCP (Adrienne Regard)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion,net.women
Subject: re re Planned Parenthood
Message-ID: <736@ttidcc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 15:03:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttidcc.736
Posted: Fri Sep 27 15:03:18 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Oct-85 07:30:54 EDT
Organization: TTI, Santa Monica, CA.
Lines: 37
Xref: linus net.politics:10530 net.religion:7376 net.women:7042



>>                 I was told that it is standard
>> practice to be SURE that women who become pregnant
>> accidentally know how not to do it again.

>If I cross the street with my eyes closed, was my
>death accidental? Why are the only options being
>considered are pregnancy and contaception? If the
>girl (and anybody who shows this lack of planning
>ahead qualifies) didn't want to get pregnant, why
>did she have sex?
>                            -anonymous (Mitchell Berger login)

This is just the sort of thing that drives me right up a
wall!  Yes, whoever is using Mitchell Berger's login and
doesn't want to admit it:

   Why did SHE have sex -- all by herself, like, without
   any other person's participation, like, underneath a
   cabbage plant,  like SHE ASKED FOR IT.

   Pure license for "men", but look at those stupid, stupid
   "girls" who can't seem to control their impulses, or,
   as you imply, secretly wish for it to happen.

By all means, lets take the information about pregnancy and
contraception away from them.  Their feeble brains just can't
deal with responsible, reasonable information -- just keep
the "girls" home till some "man" wants to marry them, in order
to procreate.

Postings like this tempt me to give up on civilization entirely.
Until I think further, and realize that postings like this indicate
civilization has yet to visit our planet.

Adrienne Regard