Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: RE:  Weird Science (response)
Message-ID: <1826@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-Oct-85 10:00:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1826
Posted: Tue Oct  1 10:00:58 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 3-Oct-85 05:31:53 EDT
References: <2250346@hpfcms.UUCP> <27500125@ISM780B.UUCP> <882@mit-vax.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 14

> A lot of people want to send anything that says "religion" to
> net.religion. The problem is that within net.religion, religion is
> always a valid point, in net.philosophy, you can say religion is
> *philosophically* unsound.

Hmmm...  Maybe that's the problem.  I'm in a newsgroup where any
*philosophy* no matter how silly is always valid, rather than one where
it's all right to show a philosophy/belief to be *logically* unsound...
-- 
"I was walking down the street.  A man came up to me and asked me what was the
 capital of Bolivia.  I hesitated.  Three sailors jumped me.  The next thing I
 knew I was making chicken salad."
"I don't believe that for a minute.  Everyone knows the capital of Bolivia is
 La Paz."				Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr