Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul M. Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Why is it?
Message-ID: <5994@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 08:30:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbscc.5994
Posted: Fri Sep 27 08:30:53 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Sep-85 05:16:54 EDT
References: <239@tekig5.UUCP> <862@mit-vax.UUCP> <321@cylixd.UUCP>
Reply-To: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul M. Dubuc)
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus
Lines: 23

In article <321@cylixd.UUCP> charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips) writes:
>>>Why is it the most outspoken and prolific writers in the 
>>>pro-life camp (in this forum) are men.  I realize men outnumber
>>>women by quite a margin on the net, but where are the female counterparts
>>>of the Pauls, Garys, and Mikes?? [David Hayes]
>>
>>They're at home, barefoot and (or course) pregnant. I don't think they'd
>>be allowed to use a computer if they knew how.  [Charles Forsythe]
>
>Charles, where's the smiley face?  
>
>If you were serious (and I hope you weren't), that remark is bigoted and
>offensive.  You owe a lot of women an apology.
>
>		charli

Not to mention some men (not that we'd expect it to happen).

One of the "Pauls",

-- 

Paul Dubuc 	cbscc!pmd