Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site loral.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!loral!pavo
From: pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man)
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: Re: More Newsgroup Changes
Message-ID: <916@loral.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Sep-85 17:02:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: loral.916
Posted: Thu Sep 12 17:02:22 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Sep-85 04:17:33 EDT
References: <289@sesame.UUCP> <8500011@uiucdcs> <10307@ucbvax.ARPA>
Reply-To: pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man)
Organization: Edge City Rumor Control
Lines: 10
Keywords: it ain't broken...so don't fix it

In article <10307@ucbvax.ARPA> fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) writes:
>I repeat, what's wrong with net.space.shuttle? It is an appropriate
>name, and it is a separate group, so you don't have to wade through
>net.space to read net.space.shuttle.
>
>	Erik E. Fair	ucbvax!fair	fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU

I say, 'net.columbia' has been adequate for years now and it works just
fine so what's all this debate about anyway?  Let's get on with shuttle-
related discussions, ok?