Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ecn-pc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-pc!wdm
From: wdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (William D Michael)
Newsgroups: net.cooks
Subject: Re: sugarless recipe (really: the gummit strikes again)
Message-ID: <391@ecn-pc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Sep-85 11:52:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: ecn-pc.391
Posted: Thu Sep 26 11:52:20 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 05:43:41 EDT
References: <503@decwrl.UUCP> <317@bcsaic.UUCP>
Reply-To: wdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (William D Michael)
Distribution: net
Organization: Electrical Engineering Department , Purdue University
Lines: 22

In article <317@bcsaic.UUCP> djd@bcsaic.UUCP (dennis j. doherty) writes:
>> 
>> While grocery shopping I noticed a product from Hansen's (the yuppy
>> natural soft drink people) called "imitation catsup."  "Imitation
>> catsup?" says I, "the mind boggles.  I wonder what imitation catsup
>> could be made of," and picked up a nearby bottle of Del Monte's to
>> compare the ingredients list.  Turns out the only difference (other
>> than it's being twice as expensive) is that it's made with honey, not
>> sugar, and so, according to the note on the label, it can't legally be
>> called catsup.  Now, aren't you glad you read this news group and learn
>> all these fascinating things?
>
>Sugar is one of the worst things you can eat, honey on the other
>hand is natural and therefore more expensive it also digests better
>in your system than process sugar.
>
>what was once natural is now "imitation"??!?!
>
>				Dennis (sugarfree)


Honey is natural and sugar isn't?