Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece
From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: some answers
Message-ID: <26600002@ccvaxa>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 15:27:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.26600002
Posted: Thu Oct  3 15:27:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 06:32:18 EDT
References: <839@gitpyr.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:gitpyr.UUCP:-83900:ccvaxa:26600002:000:703
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece    Oct  3 14:27:00 1985


I have the 1070 monitor, and I am curious about the difference between it
and the 1080.  Stereo speakers do not matter, since my Amiga and stereo
are on speaking terms.  I am very pleased with the 1070.  All of the
> I am very pleased with the 1070.  All of the interlace issues had me
> worried, but the monitor looks great.  Interlaced and otherwise.  /*
> Written  4:00 pm  Oct  2, 1985 by lbg@gitpyr.UUCP in
> ccvaxa:net.micro.amiga */
----------
Not having actually seen either an ST or an Amiga, I'm curious about
how good that monitor is.  Is it really able to deliver clean text
performance in 640x400 mode?  No flicker problems?

-- 
scott preece
gould/csd - urbana
ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece