Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!houxf!9234dwz
From: 9234dwz@houxf.UUCP (Nomad # 73299651)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: HOW TO DEAL WITH A JERK
Message-ID: <1007@houxf.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 20:26:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: houxf.1007
Posted: Sun Sep 29 20:26:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Sep-85 03:22:31 EDT
References: <1170@mhuxt.UUCP> <4410@amdcad.UUCP>, <3191@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: The End of His Tether
Lines: 32


   Chuq suggests that going for the jugular is a valid form posting
if Blacks postings are acceptable. Fine, I recently saw NSC looking
for employees. Is it therefore acceptable to berate NSC management
about the fact that their employees are calling for economic sanctions 
and using a public forum to have a certain companies employees fired ?
Personally I don't think so and it seems that most of the people 
denouncing Lauries original posting and your childish reactions to the
denouncements are also of the same opinion (that's a guess ,folks !).

Chuq , from the postings I've seen noone has defended the content of
Mr Blacks postings, IN FACT, some have been more vocal than Laurie
& yourself put together.

As Phil Ngai pointed out, he recalled you "going after another DEC
employee", I remember you going after Alex (& Scott ?) at UCLA not
so very long ago. It seems like it time for you to create

           net.chuqui  & net.chuquis.blacklist

In closing, you may well be correct in stating that Laurie & you have
as much right to post as does Don Black. However look at the feedback,
most of it indicts Laurie of sinking to a lower level than Don Black !
Is that your intention ?


    Dave Peak
    @  ihnp4!hotel!dxp

"All the net's a stage and all the men and women merely ham actors !"
- Rev Peak (apologies to Bill S.)