Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!druxo!knf
From: knf@druxo.UUCP (FricklasK)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: some answers
Message-ID: <1005@druxo.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Oct-85 10:55:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: druxo.1005
Posted: Fri Oct  4 10:55:11 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 06:46:27 EDT
References: <26600002@ccvaxa>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 21

>I have the 1070 monitor, and I am curious about the difference between it
>and the 1080.  Stereo speakers do not matter, since my Amiga and stereo
>are on speaking terms.  I am very pleased with the 1070.  All of the
>> I am very pleased with the 1070.  All of the interlace issues had me
>> worried, but the monitor looks great.  Interlaced and otherwise.  /*
>> Written  4:00 pm  Oct  2, 1985 by lbg@gitpyr.UUCP in
>> ccvaxa:net.micro.amiga */
>----------
>Not having actually seen either an ST or an Amiga, I'm curious about
>how good that monitor is.  Is it really able to deliver clean text
>performance in 640x400 mode?  No flicker problems?
>
>-- 
>scott preece
>gould/csd - urbana
>ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece
Yep.
   '`'`
   Ken
   '`'`