Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.med
Subject: Re: Purging Stoll and his kind
Message-ID: <239@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Sep-85 17:50:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: graffiti.239
Posted: Tue Sep 24 17:50:34 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Sep-85 04:22:51 EDT
References: <2172@ukma.UUCP> <813@mcnc.mcnc.UUCP> <272@bbncc5.UUCP> <10437@ucbvax.ARPA>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 10

> I thought that Godel's incompleteness theorems, Quantum
> physics and such had blown scientific materialism out of
> the water, at least as far as being a "true" description
> of the world.

Unfortunately no-one never claimed that it's the "true" description of
the world. All we can say is that so far it works, unlike any other
model of the world that I've ever heard of. Of course choosing a model
based on "what works" is part of SM in the first place, but what better
criteria fo you have?