Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site im4u.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!im4u!rajkumar
From: rajkumar@im4u.UUCP (V. Rajkumar)
Newsgroups: net.nlang.india
Subject: Re: Rajneeshpuram in uproar!
Message-ID: <567@im4u.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-Oct-85 12:49:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: im4u.567
Posted: Tue Oct  1 12:49:14 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 03:13:18 EDT
References: <40800011@waltz> <10400002@uicsl>
Reply-To: rajkumar@im4u.UUCP (V. Rajkumar)
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 22
Summary: 

In article <10400002@uicsl> brahme@uicsl.UUCP writes:
>
>
>I fail to understand why some people criticize Rajneesh & his activities. I
>am not aware of his preachings but just reading the criticism against him, i
>feel i should say my bit. 
>
>>  "'I'm not much interested in uneducated, illiterate street beggars',
>>Rajneesh said. (So much for Rajneesh's claims to being a God. Uneducated,
>>illiterate street beggars don't have Rolls Royces to 'donate' to him,
>>unfortunately).
>
>First of all there is nothing wrong in someone claiming to be a GOD! And
>there is no reason why all such GODS have to help the poor & the needy. 

  I totally disagree.  If Brahme has a different definition of God, then that
 is a different story.

>Remember the rich also ocassionally require help. Where would they go if
>there was'nt any one like Rajneesh around?
   
  Does that mean the poor go to the rich when in need of help?