Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: CROSSTALK @ 9600baud. Beware! Message-ID: <240@graffiti.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Sep-85 18:10:36 EDT Article-I.D.: graffiti.240 Posted: Tue Sep 24 18:10:36 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Sep-85 05:41:17 EDT References: <697@othervax.UUCP> Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 8 > Due to occasional loss of data using XTALK at 9600baud over > standard serial ports, in terminal mode, with Capture on or > off, an investigation has revealed: Also note that using anything at 9600 baud on a PC is pushing the capabilities of the machine. I find that to make XTALK or anything else reliable at that speed I have to get rid of all my desktop utilities except for sidekick (which doesn't seem to bother it).