Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site olgba.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!ist!olgb1!olgba!olmp
From: olmp@olgba.UUCP (Mike Pellatt)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Re: Re: 68000 Laptop portables with networking
Message-ID: <171@olgba.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Sep-85 07:50:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: olgba.171
Posted: Sat Sep 14 07:50:03 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Sep-85 00:06:27 EDT
References: <876@brl-tgr.ARPA> <1633@watdcsu.UUCP> <47@intelca.UUCP>
Organization: British Olivetti Ltd.,AT&T Computer Division.
Lines: 20
Xpath: icdoc ivax

> If you want to take it that far.......How about a modem somehow attached
> to the portable part of a cordless phone, or maybe one of these "cellular
> telephone systems" that they are advertising these days. Does anyone know
> whether the signal quality would be high enough for reasonable transfer
> rates with a reasonable error rate?
> 
> 
> Rick Sellens

   I know for a fact that this is being implemented on the U.K. cellular
radio systems by both Racal-Vodafone and Cellnet (the B.T. system). The
rumours in the computing press said that each system was proposing 
different error-correction standards. Anyone know anything more about
this ????

-- 
Mike Pellatt, Software Support, AT&T Computer Division, British Olivetti Ltd.,
Wellington House, 154-160 Upper Richmond Road, LONDON, SW15 2FN.
Tel: (+44) 1 789 6699	Telefax: (+44) 1 874 3014	Telex:27258
Uucp : {ihnp4!cuuxb | mcvax!ukc!uel | olhqma }!olgb1!olmp