Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site convexs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!convexs!ayers
From: ayers@convexs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: If you could save lives, would
Message-ID: <5800025@convexs>
Date: Fri, 20-Sep-85 15:40:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: convexs.5800025
Posted: Fri Sep 20 15:40:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Sep-85 05:43:49 EDT
References: <447@decwrl.UUCP>
Lines: 43
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl.UUCP:-44700:convexs:5800025:000:1186
Nf-From: convexs.UUCP!ayers    Sep 20 14:40:00 1985


>>>...Congress passed the law, and it can remove it...
>>
>>According to the information I have, this is NOT a "law" but
>>a DOT "ruling" -- which means Congress never voted it in and
>>cannot remove it!
>>
>>				blues, II
>
>C'mon, Congress can have no say in the matter?  So we back off one more
>level--it established the DOT, and it can change the rules under which it
>operates.  (Though it may not wish to do so.)  It just makes it a bit harder,
>that's all.


Oooppppsss!  What I _meant_ to say was: "Congress never voted it in and 
therefore cannot `vote' it out."  You are, of course, correct [damn it]...
The point was that this whole thing is being shoved down our throats (along 
with all the other DOT rulings) without ANY representation.  Time for a 
"tea party."


(And they said to me "You've lost your mind!" 
   and I said "No I haven't, I just can't 
       remember where I left it...")




					B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)
						 B~)
						 B~)
					   B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)
						 B~)
						 B~)
					B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)B~)
					B~)		  B~)
					B~) B~)B~)B~)B~)  B~)
					B~)	      /	  B~)
					B~)		  B~)
					B~) B~)B~)B~)B~)  B~)
					B~)	      /	  B~)
					B~)		  ;-)