Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: some answers Message-ID: <26600002@ccvaxa> Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 15:27:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.26600002 Posted: Thu Oct 3 15:27:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 06:32:18 EDT References: <839@gitpyr.UUCP> Lines: 17 Nf-ID: #R:gitpyr.UUCP:-83900:ccvaxa:26600002:000:703 Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece Oct 3 14:27:00 1985 I have the 1070 monitor, and I am curious about the difference between it and the 1080. Stereo speakers do not matter, since my Amiga and stereo are on speaking terms. I am very pleased with the 1070. All of the > I am very pleased with the 1070. All of the interlace issues had me > worried, but the monitor looks great. Interlaced and otherwise. /* > Written 4:00 pm Oct 2, 1985 by lbg@gitpyr.UUCP in > ccvaxa:net.micro.amiga */ ---------- Not having actually seen either an ST or an Amiga, I'm curious about how good that monitor is. Is it really able to deliver clean text performance in 640x400 mode? No flicker problems? -- scott preece gould/csd - urbana ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece