Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2(pesnta-1.3@8/13/85) 9/18/84; site pesnta.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!pesnta!earlw
From: earlw@pesnta.UUCP (20)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp,net.unix-wizards
Subject: RLOGIN failures with uucp
Message-ID: <2842@pesnta.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Sep-85 19:52:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: pesnta.2842
Posted: Fri Sep 20 19:52:32 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Sep-85 05:09:53 EDT
Reply-To: earlw@pesnta.UUCP (Earl Wallace)
Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG/CSD, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 24
Keywords: uucp RLOGIN
Xref: watmath net.bugs.uucp:593 net.unix-wizards:14929

Seems that the RLOGIN message comes from the 5.2 uucico when it can't find the
login name in the USERFILE.  The login name *must* be present in the USERFILE.
In no case can the login name be missing from the USERFILE.  Period.  At least
from  what  I  can tell.  In the sample USERFILE below, removing the null line
won't change the results one bit.

USERFILE:
	, 		/			(null line)
	n1,		/
	,s1		/
	n2,s2		/

Results:
	login=n1, machine=s1, ret=0	login match with null machine
	login=n1, machine=s2, ret=0	login match with null machine
	login=n1, machine=s3, ret=0	login match with null machine
	login=n2, machine=s1, ret=2	login not paired with machine 
	login=n2, machine=s2, ret=0	login match and machine match
	login=n2, machine=s3, ret=2	login not paired with machine 
	login=n3, machine=s1, ret=2	login not in USERFILE
	login=n3, machine=s2, ret=2	login not in USERFILE
	login=n3, machine=s3, ret=2	login not in USERFILE

Must be a security reason for this, eh?