Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sfmag.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!sfmag!mjs
From: mjs@sfmag.UUCP (M.J.Shannon)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Compiler Error Checking and Error Messages - How much is too much?
Message-ID: <697@sfmag.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 15-Sep-85 10:34:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: sfmag.697
Posted: Sun Sep 15 10:34:33 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 23:53:13 EDT
References: <551@scc.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Summit, NJ
Lines: 16

A comment, if I may: Up until now, C has been an evolving language.  With the
upcoming standardization of the language by a recognized body (ANSI), compiler
writers are less free to impose super-strict interpretation of the intent of
the language *unless such is permitted or required by the standard*.  This is
a *good thing*.  It precludes exactly what you're complaining about (except in
the case of a machine which does not yet have a conforming compiler).  I
haven't thought much on what this means to folks writing code to be super
portable (i.e., to both ANSI conforming compilers and to older compilers), but
I believe there's a suitable common subset that is useable for this purpose.

Perhaps discussion of this subset is a good topic for this group?
-- 
	Marty Shannon
UUCP:	ihnp4!attunix!mjs
Phone:	+1 (201) 522 6063
Disclaimer: I speak for no one.