Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site leadsv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!bbnccv!bbncca!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!cae780!leadsv!sas
From: sas@leadsv.UUCP (Scott Stewart)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: More on Totally Bad Movies
Message-ID: <634@leadsv.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 15:58:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: leadsv.634
Posted: Wed Oct  2 15:58:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 06:26:48 EDT
References: <327@cylixd.UUCP> <280@tekcrl.UUCP>
Organization: LMSC-LEADS, Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 18
Summary: rebuttal (sp?)

In article <280@tekcrl.UUCP>, terryl@tekcrl.UUCP writes:
> 
>      My vote for a totally bad movie would have to go to "Sargeant Pepper's
>Lonely Hearts Club Band", the movie, that is. Acting was non-existant(how they
>got George Burns to do this movie I could never figure out); the plot consisted
>of taking a lot of Beatle songs and then trying to write a story around the
>songs was just totally ludicrous. All in all, a VERY bad film (to quote old
>Leonard Pinth, himself!!!)

Yes, but the original music and lyrics were good, and even the BeeGees 
couldn't destroy it. Therefore, it can't be totally bad.


					Scott A. Stewart
					LMSC - Sunnyvale

P.S.  Personally, I liked some of the songs, though not as good as the
	original Beatle's versions.