Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utflis.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!utai!utflis!brown
From: brown@utflis.UUCP (Susan Brown)
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Settling Star Trek argument....
Message-ID: <290@utflis.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 15:47:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: utflis.290
Posted: Wed Oct  2 15:47:17 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 17:43:06 EDT
References: <3704@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <254@hyper.UUCP>
Reply-To: brown@utflis.UUCP (Susan Brown)
Organization: FLIS, University of Toronto
Lines: 13
Summary: 

In article <254@hyper.UUCP> brust@hyper.UUCP (Steven Brust) writes:
>"Mehuselah" is correct.  There is an sf writer who is currently
>working on a Star Trek novel that will be a sequal to this
>episode, and attempt to plug some of the historical and
>characterization holes it left.  The book is not under
>contract, so I don't know if will sell, but the draft is
>near completion and reads quite well.  In fact reads
>very, very, VERY well--for a Star Trek novel.

So give! Who? Where? Maybe if they can't sell it to Pocket Books (the
only publisher with permission from Paramount) they can sell it privately
like a fanzine.  ST Fandom can get to work on this.
Thanks.