Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!amdahl!rtech!jeff
From: jeff@rtech.UUCP (Jeff Lichtman)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Canadian national anthem (this is baseball?)
Message-ID: <664@rtech.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 28-Sep-85 19:02:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: rtech.664
Posted: Sat Sep 28 19:02:58 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:53:00 EDT
References: <347@zaphod.UUCP> <3900015@csd2.UUCP> <2537@watcgl.UUCP> <804@lsuc.UUCP> <16587@watmath.UUCP>
Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA
Lines: 16

> American net-readers may be amused, or stunned,
> to learn just how controversial a national anthem can be in its own
> country!
> 
> Chris

Not after what happened to Jose Feliciano several years ago.  He sang a
jazzed-up version of "The Star Spangled Banner", and all the rednecks and
imbecilic pseudo-patriots assumed he was being disrespectful to his country's
flag.
-- 
Jeff Lichtman at rtech (Relational Technology, Inc.)
"Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent..."

{amdahl, sun}!rtech!jeff
{ucbvax, decvax}!mtxinu!rtech!jeff