Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcs Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!mcewan From: mcewan@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Re: banning pornography Message-ID: <40400021@uiucdcs> Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 13:19:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.40400021 Posted: Mon Sep 30 13:19:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:10:22 EDT References: <885@ptsfa.UUCP> Lines: 19 Nf-ID: #R:ptsfa.UUCP:-88500:uiucdcs:40400021:000:743 Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!mcewan Sep 30 12:19:00 1985 > The idea of free speech > is silly to me. Would you think it was reasonable for someone to start > telling hundreds of people that YOU personally should be killed? Deny > them the right to do this and you deny them free speech. But allow them > to do this and there is a legal way to murder. Which do you choose? To > me the choice is obvious. Any reasonable society has to put limits on > so-called "free speech". Would you kill someone because I told you to? If you did, do you think I should be charged with the killing? Scott McEwan {ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan "I know what you are. Nut. Screwball. Flake. Lunatic. Fruitcake. Bats in the attic. Psycho. All your dogs aren't barking." "Are too! Are too! Woof! Woof!"