Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!utastro!nather From: nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Break Continued Message-ID: <6@utastro.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 10:40:25 EDT Article-I.D.: utastro.6 Posted: Wed Oct 2 10:40:25 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 04:54:57 EDT References: <1843@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX Lines: 17 > I'm not entirely sure I agree with you about adding construx to the > language tho. I once saw this thruout a bunch of sources: > I'm quite sure I disagree with the constructs you appear to be adding to the language --- the English language. #ifdef cottrell #define construx constructs #define tho though #define thruout throughout #endif -- Ed Nather Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin {allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather nather@astro.UTEXAS.EDU