Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!columbia!topaz!BILLW
From: BILLW@SU-SCORE.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Atari ST worse than 800?
Message-ID: <3656@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Sat, 14-Sep-85 08:52:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3656
Posted: Sat Sep 14 08:52:07 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Sep-85 05:18:43 EDT
Sender: daemon@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 14

From: William "Chops" Westfield 

It is generally agreed that The Atari 800 familly of personal computers
has the best graphics capabilities of the current (previous?) generation.
(According to the people at Lucasfilms Games division (Geez - talk about
redefining "high performance graphics" can you say Anti-aliasing, fractal
landscapes, 20 fps animation?)).

Messages I have seen on this list imply that the new (ST) computer
lacks even some of the graphics hardware that the 800 has.  Is this
true?  Really?  Why!!??

BillW
-------