Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!think!mit-eddie!barmar From: barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: menubar items without menus? (suggested enhancement...) Message-ID: <5413@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 02:11:05 EDT Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.5413 Posted: Mon Sep 30 02:11:05 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 20:07:13 EDT References: <3608@dartvax.UUCP> <568@k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA> Reply-To: barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin) Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 20 In article <568@k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA> tim@k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA (Tim Maroney) writes: >No, Switcher does not use this, if I understand the proposal. First, the >Switcher arrow is graphics, not a menu title. Second, it does not go >through the Menu Manager; instead, it intercepts mouse-down events in >GetNextEvent and uses "raw" hit-testing to see if they occurred in the >Switcher arrow. This is not the same thing Chuq is suggesting. Until I read Inside Switcher this week, I thought that it somehow used the Menu Manager (until this reading, I was very confused when I couldn't find the resources for Command-[, Command-], and Command-\). However, this is all besides the point. I was referring to the user view of the interface. To the user, the switcher arrow seems like a strange menu title with weird properties. The very fact that I have described it as "strange" and "weird" should alert developers to the fact that it is not consistent with the rest of the system, and consistency is supposed to be an important feature of the Mac. -- Barry Margolin ARPA: barmar@MIT-Multics UUCP: ..!genrad!mit-eddie!barmar