Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site laidbak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!laidbak!jeq
From: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Re: The new hugging symbol
Message-ID: <215@laidbak.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Sep-85 00:41:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: laidbak.215
Posted: Sun Sep 22 00:41:30 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Sep-85 23:41:53 EDT
References: <1211@ihlpg.UUCP> <519@cornell.UUCP> <249@kepler.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Organization: LAI Chicago
Lines: 22

In article <249@kepler.UUCP> mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones) writes:
>In article <519@cornell.UUCP> pugh@cornell.UUCP (William Pugh) writes:
>>	I'm not really sure, but I thought "X X X" represented the crossed arms
>>of a hug and "O O O" represented the puckered lips of a kiss.  Where might
>>one look for a definitive answer on this type of thing?  I don't think it's
>>listing in the dictionary...
>
>Ohhhhhh nooooo!
>
>I always thought that the X was two mouths touching, and the O was the
>circle made by my arms in a hug.
>
>-- 
>Mojo
>... Morris Jones, MicroPro Product Development
>{dual,hplabs,glacier,lll-crg}!well!micropro!kepler!mojo

I was under the impression that XOXOXOX, not seperately but
all together, meant simultaneous hugs AND kisses.
In my mind that's preferable to just one or the other.

jeq