Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site im4u.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!im4u!rajkumar From: rajkumar@im4u.UUCP (V. Rajkumar) Newsgroups: net.nlang.india Subject: Re: Rajneeshpuram in uproar! Message-ID: <567@im4u.UUCP> Date: Tue, 1-Oct-85 12:49:14 EDT Article-I.D.: im4u.567 Posted: Tue Oct 1 12:49:14 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 03:13:18 EDT References: <40800011@waltz> <10400002@uicsl> Reply-To: rajkumar@im4u.UUCP (V. Rajkumar) Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 22 Summary: In article <10400002@uicsl> brahme@uicsl.UUCP writes: > > >I fail to understand why some people criticize Rajneesh & his activities. I >am not aware of his preachings but just reading the criticism against him, i >feel i should say my bit. > >> "'I'm not much interested in uneducated, illiterate street beggars', >>Rajneesh said. (So much for Rajneesh's claims to being a God. Uneducated, >>illiterate street beggars don't have Rolls Royces to 'donate' to him, >>unfortunately). > >First of all there is nothing wrong in someone claiming to be a GOD! And >there is no reason why all such GODS have to help the poor & the needy. I totally disagree. If Brahme has a different definition of God, then that is a different story. >Remember the rich also ocassionally require help. Where would they go if >there was'nt any one like Rajneesh around? Does that mean the poor go to the rich when in need of help?