Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-bee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!maa
From: maa@ssc-bee.UUCP (Mark A Allyn)
Newsgroups: net.dcom,net.video,net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: Satellite viewing "freedoms"
Message-ID: <372@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 10:13:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: ssc-bee.372
Posted: Tue Sep 17 10:13:16 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 04:47:21 EDT
References: <779@vortex.UUCP>, <262@mot.UUCP> <293@unccvax.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.dcom:1304 net.video:1518 net.ham-radio:3254

>      The real solution to this whole mess is to leave the electronic media
> alone, deregulate the heck out of it (except for technical matters such as
> harmful interference and so on) and let good old American engineering solve
> the problem of "freeloaders" . . .

Come on - there you go along with everyone else. You just ruined your
objective by including an exclusion clause. Why not go all the way and
let the industry solve all of its own problems including interference.
Eliminate the FCC. Once you stipulate something to regulate (harmfull
interference, you open the floodgates for other exceptions.

Mark Allyn
WA1SEY
!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!maa