Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site pid.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!pid!pwd
From: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Another Amiga reaction
Message-ID: <192@pid.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Sep-85 06:10:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: pid.192
Posted: Thu Sep 26 06:10:35 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 06:59:08 EDT
References: <4353@alice.UUCP>
Reply-To: pwd@pid.UUCP (Philip W. Dalrymple)
Organization: P & I Design, Inc. Atlanta
Lines: 22
Summary: 

In article <4353@alice.UUCP> aer@alice.UucP (y) writes:
>
>As for interlaced (400 pixel vertical resolution) graphics (on the Amiga
>monitor) ...well... trash it. It looked as if we were looking at the otherwise
>amazing digitized 640x400 mandrill through a filter of bubbly ginger ale.
>The flicker was badawfulyuckterrible. I hope that was only the monitor in
>bad shape. I hope. Anyone able to reply to that?
>
I saw the Amiga in the the offices of Amiga here in Atlanta Including
a MacPaint like program (the one the person demoing had a real handle on)
the software looked to me to be faster than MacPaint (but this was nether
a side by side demo nor do the packages have the same "commands" [BTW what
are the things you do with a mouse]). The monitor looked very good to me
for a $3000 system .
>
> 


-- 
Philip Dalrymple
akgua!pid!pwd
404/429-8266 (voice)