Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!amdahl!rtech!jeff From: jeff@rtech.UUCP (Jeff Lichtman) Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball Subject: Re: Canadian national anthem (this is baseball?) Message-ID: <664@rtech.UUCP> Date: Sat, 28-Sep-85 19:02:58 EDT Article-I.D.: rtech.664 Posted: Sat Sep 28 19:02:58 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:53:00 EDT References: <347@zaphod.UUCP> <3900015@csd2.UUCP> <2537@watcgl.UUCP> <804@lsuc.UUCP> <16587@watmath.UUCP> Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA Lines: 16 > American net-readers may be amused, or stunned, > to learn just how controversial a national anthem can be in its own > country! > > Chris Not after what happened to Jose Feliciano several years ago. He sang a jazzed-up version of "The Star Spangled Banner", and all the rednecks and imbecilic pseudo-patriots assumed he was being disrespectful to his country's flag. -- Jeff Lichtman at rtech (Relational Technology, Inc.) "Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent..." {amdahl, sun}!rtech!jeff {ucbvax, decvax}!mtxinu!rtech!jeff