Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site teklds.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!hankb
From: hankb@teklds.UUCP (Hank Buurman)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: The Dworkin Referendum
Message-ID: <1095@teklds.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 20:44:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: teklds.1095
Posted: Wed Oct  2 20:44:33 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 06:22:19 EDT
References: <248@ssc-vax.UUCP> <3641@dartvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: hankb@teklds.UUCP (Hank Buurman)
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 24

In article <3641@dartvax.UUCP> dnc@dartvax.UUCP (David Crespo) writes:
>
> 
>speqking of porn and rape, how do netters feel aobout the upcoming 
>Dworkin-?? referendum coming up in cambridge. ? I am going to 
>probably try and type an intersesting pro-con artiicle in
>this (OCT>) month's SOJOURNER on it (if I can slot the time in
>a reasonable time) but all of you experts must surely be aware of
>what is going down or coming up. (as it were) . The list of people involved
>heralds some of the most influential names in feminism,
>but I'll get to that when I type the article (which  is
>long, so bear with me). The issue ist seems is hittin
>the streets much sooner han than you think. And what the
>article does manage to do is point out some of angle
>(sociological and other) that most of us are too timid or
>inarticulate to present. The relationshi[p of this to 
>broader issues, and inner conflicts within zee moovement, is
> very interesting indeed...be forewarned


Is this an alien language? Or am I too new to recognize net.slang?

Hank Buurman
tektronix!dadla!hankb