Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdahl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!sun!amdahl!sjl
From: sjl@amdahl.UUCP (Steve Langdon)
Newsgroups: net.lan
Subject: Re: Soderbloom's patent
Message-ID: <2023@amdahl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Sep-85 23:02:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdahl.2023
Posted: Sat Sep 14 23:02:40 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Sep-85 04:43:00 EDT
References: <771@asgb.UUCP>
Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 17

> 
>   Has there been any definite ruling on Olof Soderbloom's patent
> contention?  He alleged that his patent covers all token passing
> ring configurations.  However, the last that I read was about 2
> years ago when the whole mess was still up in the air.
> 
> Bob Devine

I heard that he recently succeeded in getting the Patent Office to reissue
the patent with significantly broader claims.  I suspect that some laywers
are going to get rich fighting about this issue when IEEE 802.5 networks
finally make it to market.
-- 
Stephen J. Langdon                  ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,hplabs,sun}!amdahl!sjl

[ The article above is not an official statement from any organization
  in the known universe. ]