Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Racer X) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Astrology Message-ID: <635@hou2g.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 16:38:10 EDT Article-I.D.: hou2g.635 Posted: Tue Sep 17 16:38:10 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 05:09:39 EDT References: <2178@iddic.UUCP> Organization: The Finish Line Lines: 21 >I'm not convinced that astrology is totally bogus. I don't mean the >astrology you get on the comic page. I mean the idea that a person's >life, health, and personality are (to whatever extent) influenced by the >exact time and place of his/her birth. Any astrology buffs/debunkers >out there care to comment? > >Kendall Auel Sure. Why does the time and/or place of birth have anything to do with it? Why not the time of conception? Why not 5 months and 17 days into the pregnancy? Do women have labor induced so that their child will have a more favorable horoscope? Not that these are the only questions, of course, just "pet peeves" of mine. SJBerry