Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site meccts.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!rosevax!dicomed!meccts!ahby From: ahby@meccts.UUCP (Shane P. McCarron) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: time to remove net.bizarre Message-ID: <224@meccts.UUCP> Date: Wed, 11-Sep-85 18:34:55 EDT Article-I.D.: meccts.224 Posted: Wed Sep 11 18:34:55 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 11:45:43 EDT References: <1969@amdahl.UUCP> <688@cyb-eng.UUCP> Reply-To: ahby@meccts.UUCP (Shane P. McCarron) Organization: MECC Technical Services, St.Paul, MN Lines: 23 Summary: In article <688@cyb-eng.UUCP> howard@cyb-eng.UUCP (Howard Johnson) writes: >> Are there really any of its original supporters who still feel >> it is worth keeping around? > >While I wasn't quite an original supporter (accepter would be more >appropriate), I don't see much value in it now. I wasn't an original supporter... I'm not even a current supporter, but it seems to me that the rules say a group will be removed when its traffic becomes so low that it is no longer necessary. Is net.bizzares traffic low? I don't think so, but I haven't checked lately. For the people who are being heavy-handed about this group, the real issue is: would you like a group you cared about to be attacked in this way? I certainly wouldn't! -- Shane P. McCarron Minnesota Educational Computing Corporation - Technical Services UUCP ihnp4!dicomed!meccts!ahby