Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!druxo!knf From: knf@druxo.UUCP (FricklasK) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: some answers Message-ID: <1005@druxo.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-Oct-85 10:55:11 EDT Article-I.D.: druxo.1005 Posted: Fri Oct 4 10:55:11 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 06:46:27 EDT References: <26600002@ccvaxa> Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 21 >I have the 1070 monitor, and I am curious about the difference between it >and the 1080. Stereo speakers do not matter, since my Amiga and stereo >are on speaking terms. I am very pleased with the 1070. All of the >> I am very pleased with the 1070. All of the interlace issues had me >> worried, but the monitor looks great. Interlaced and otherwise. /* >> Written 4:00 pm Oct 2, 1985 by lbg@gitpyr.UUCP in >> ccvaxa:net.micro.amiga */ >---------- >Not having actually seen either an ST or an Amiga, I'm curious about >how good that monitor is. Is it really able to deliver clean text >performance in 640x400 mode? No flicker problems? > >-- >scott preece >gould/csd - urbana >ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece Yep. '`'` Ken '`'`