Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site burdvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!psuvax1!burdvax!bnapl
From: bnapl@burdvax.UUCP (Tom Albrecht)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: pro-choice means choice for all
Message-ID: <2131@burdvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Sep-85 12:56:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: burdvax.2131
Posted: Fri Sep 20 12:56:04 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Sep-85 12:06:03 EDT
References: 
Reply-To: bnapl@burdvax.UUCP (Tom Albrecht)
Organization: Burroughs Corp. - SDG/Devon
Lines: 26

In article  z@rocksvax.UUCP (Jim Ziobro) writes:
>It is about time to point out to the anti-choice people the dangers of persuing
>their anti-choice position.  Too often I hear about the "woman's" right to
>choice.  Of course what is really meant is all humans have the right to choice
>with respect to their bodies. ... 

But pro-choicers conveniently deny the humanity of a certain portion of the
population in order to deny them their rights.  Sounds a lot like 19th
century slavery to me.  I hope it doesn't become inconvenient to be a white
male over thirty or I'm in trouble.

I would like to hear some examples of where
>the anti-choice position would hurt all of humanity.
>-- 
>//Z\\
>James M. Ziobro
>Ziobro.Henr@Xerox.ARPA
>{rochester,amd,sunybcs,allegra}!rocksvax!z

Whenever you deny rights to one segment of the population for the benefit
of another you hurt all of humanity.  Life is an inalienable right; access
to an abortion is not.

-- 
Tom Albrecht 		Burroughs Corp.
			...{presby|psuvax1|sdcrdcf}!burdvax!bnapl