Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/13/84; site intelca.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!intelca!cem
From: cem@intelca.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Re: what's needed for a home pc
Message-ID: <109@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 11:23:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: intelca.109
Posted: Thu Oct  3 11:23:48 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 06:45:18 EDT
References: <944@qumix.UUCP> <86@intelca.UUCP> <2190@ukma.UUCP> <278@ccivax.UUCP> <948@vax2.fluke.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 20

> 4.  Integration with appliances.  This is mostly a requirement that the
> appliances be computer controllable.  There will also have to be a
> "universal control language" or smart, device independent control software.

This sort of reminds me of GE's HomeNet (tm). Anyone know what ever happened
to this effort? HomeNet is/was a network based on signals sent over your 
house's wiring that was supposed to be standardized so that all of your 
appliances etc could communicate and report status to a monitoring station
or computer. In college I considered such a system myself but never implemented
it due to the lack of knoweledge on how to build a carrier current modem, and
not quite enough motivation to modify a bunch of appliances. This seems like
it might also be an application for GM's MAP protocol. 

--Chuck

-- 
                                            - - - D I S C L A I M E R - - - 
{ihnp4,fortune}!dual\                     All opinions expressed herein are my
        {qantel,idi}-> !intelca!cem       own and not those of my employer, my
 {ucbvax,hao}!hplabs/                     friends, or my avocado plant. :-}