Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site gymble.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!gymble!speaker From: speaker@gymble.UUCP (Speaker to Animals) Newsgroups: net.music.classical Subject: Re: Sibelius - tone poems Message-ID: <336@gymble.UUCP> Date: Sun, 15-Sep-85 01:04:27 EDT Article-I.D.: gymble.336 Posted: Sun Sep 15 01:04:27 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 23:48:07 EDT References: <730@charm.UUCP> <1062@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <392@scgvaxd.UUCP> <1239@teddy.UUCP> Reply-To: speaker@gymble.UUCP (Speaker to Animals) Organization: U of Maryland, Laboratory for Parallel Computation, C.P., MD Lines: 9 In article <1239@teddy.UUCP> rdp@teddy.UUCP (Richard D. Pierce) writes: > > When I was studying Baroque organ, I expressed to my teacher my fondness > of Sibelius. His comment was that Sibelius is ok, as long as you like > music searching desperately for a theme. And I sauppose we could also talk about the music of Mahler... Music that has little or nothing to say, but spends hours doing it anyway.