Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site stolaf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!haeckel
From: haeckel@stolaf.UUCP (Paul C. Haeckel)
Newsgroups: net.bizarre
Subject: Re: Re: Mounting Toilet Paper Rolls.
Message-ID: <4938@stolaf.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 21:15:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: stolaf.4938
Posted: Thu Oct  3 21:15:37 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 04:43:13 EDT
References: <90@uottawa.UUCP> <1893@bmcg.UUCP> <1894@bmcg.UUCP> <1896@bmcg.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: St. Olaf College, Northfield MN
Lines: 36

/*** numerous people have written ****/
> > In article <1893@bmcg.UUCP> bobn@bmcg.UUCP (Bob Nebert) writes:
> > >> ........  My problem is that I don't know which way to mount
> > >> the rolls of toilet paper in the bathrooms.
> > >> 
> > >> There are two ways that this can be done:  With the loose
> > >> end CLOSE to the wall, or it could be AWAY from the wall.  
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks in advance for your assistance.
> > >>
> > 
> > >Everybody knows that its put with the loose end CLOSE to the wall
> > 
> > Tsk, tsk, tsk.  I'm surprised at you, Bob.  A successful, big-time
> > newspaper publisher like yourself making a mistake like this.  The
> > loose end goes AWAY from the wall.  That way you can see the pretty
> > flowers or bunnies or birdies or hand grenades printed on the paper
> > as the loose end hangs..er..drapes off of the roll.  Also, that is
> > the way Archie Bunker preferred his toilet paper.  Ergo, this is the
> > proper way.  QED.
> > 
> > Get with it, Bob.  You wouldn't want to wind up in court, would you?
> > 
> > Larry J. Huntley            Burroughs Corporation
> > 
> Larry NO   NO   NO. Remember in the movie "Smokey and the Bandit" 
> Sherrif Buford T. Pusser, Texas Ranger, left the bathroom and was
> dragging a long roll behind him. Of course it got caught in his
> aaaaaaa belt, shall we say. If the loose end was in to the wall he  
> wouldn't gotten caught and looked stupid. I stand by my earlier
> judgement.

This is what I love about USENET -- there are always so many 
important technical discussions going on. :-) I think it's 
about time we got the Stupid People's Court in on this and
settled it once and for all.