Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!broome From: broome@ucbvax.ARPA (Jonathan C. Broome) Newsgroups: net.sources.bugs Subject: Re: Possible bug in "rman". Message-ID: <10481@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 14:18:34 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.10481 Posted: Fri Sep 27 14:18:34 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 08:43:59 EDT References: <150@bubba.UUCP> Reply-To: broome@ucbvax.UUCP (Jonathan C. Broome) Distribution: net Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 15 In article <150@bubba.UUCP> gj@bubba.UUCP writes: >Is the sense of the '-k' and '-f' flags in 'rman' reversed with respect >to 'man' or am I missing something? They're right as far as I can tell, at least compared to the standard Berkeley 'man'. The '-f ' flag in man is the same as 'apropos', and the '-k' is the same as 'whatis'. If you get these confused, just use the '-a' and '-w' flags to rman, they're easier to remember (that's why I added them). =========================================================== Jonathan C. Broome University of California, Berkeley UUCP ...!ucbvax!broome ARPA broome@ucbvax.ARPA ===========================================================