Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!utastro!nather
From: nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Break Continued
Message-ID: <6@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 10:40:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: utastro.6
Posted: Wed Oct  2 10:40:25 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 04:54:57 EDT
References: <1843@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 17

> I'm not entirely sure I agree with you about adding construx to the
> language tho. I once saw this thruout a bunch of sources:
> 
I'm quite sure I disagree with the constructs you appear to be adding to
the language --- the English language. 

#ifdef cottrell
   #define construx constructs
   #define tho      though
   #define thruout  throughout
#endif

-- 
Ed Nather
Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin
{allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather
nather@astro.UTEXAS.EDU