Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bunny.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!bunny!epm0
From: epm0@bunny.UUCP (Erik Mintz)
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio,net.aviation
Subject: Re: SALYUT_7 SWLING
Message-ID: <163@bunny.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 08:02:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: bunny.163
Posted: Thu Aug 15 08:02:15 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 07:28:16 EDT
References: <3596@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA
Lines: 40
Xref: linus net.ham-radio:2450 net.aviation:1718

> 
> The follow is the Keplerian Element Set an previously know
> frequencies use by SLYUT_7.   I have not hear them yet but
> what I understand there is a good chance one may hear them
> off the coast of New England as  they talk to the "Russian
> fishing fleet  :)"  
> 
> freq. most likely on
> 121.750 mhz WBFM  actively reported freq.
> 142.400 mhz WBFM  actively reported freq.
> 162.000 mhz WBFM  TEL data
> 192.000 mhz WBFM  ( tobad for chan 9 ) 
> 
> less likely but possible
> 121.500 mhz
> 121.625 mhz
> 142.417 mhz
> 142.600 mhz
>  18.000/18.060 mhz am
>  15.008 mhz
>  20.008 mhz
>
>	...
>	...
> 

Several of these frequencies are in the aircraft band.

121.5 is the civilian aircraft emergency frequency. I thought this was
by international convention. I would be very surprised to find anyone
transmitting routine messages on it. I certainly have never heard any.

In fact, I thought that the whole band between 118 MHz and 135 MHz was
alloted to aircraft operations. Can anyone correct me on this?

-- 
Erik Mintz

ARPA or CSnet : epm0%gte-labs.csnet@csnet-relay
UUCP: ...harvard!bunny!epm0