Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site Navajo.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!Navajo!bothner From: bothner@Navajo.ARPA Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: "Bride" ("gayness" in movie) Message-ID: <178@Navajo.ARPA> Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 21:08:34 EDT Article-I.D.: Navajo.178 Posted: Wed Aug 21 21:08:34 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 04:25:52 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Stanford University Lines: 85 [This minor interchange about the new movie "Bride" was posted to the GAY bulletin board here at Stanford. It's been suggested the net.motss might find it interesting, so (with permission) here it is. I'd be interested to see the reactions of other people (especially straights and/or people with inside information). The bboard's address is gay@SU-SUSHI.ARPA or ...decwrl!glacier!gay@sushi. It is on four DEC-20 machines here, including the standard instructional machines available to all students. Recently, net.motss is also being forwarded (read-only) to the same machines. Both bboards have a large readership. The number of people who post (to "gay") is (as to be expected) usually fairly small, and the traffic varies: Now during break, things are rather quiet, but now and then we get some controversy and suddenly there is a lot of traffic, sometimes also on the regular bboards. This is helped by the fact that the campus organization Gay and Lesbian Alliance at Stanford (GLAS) is very active, visible and attracts people from all over the Peninsula.] ------- Date: Mon 19 Aug 85 19:08:31-PDT From: Per BothnerSubject: "Bride" I saw "Bride" the other day (the remake of the cult classic "The Bride of Frankenstein"). I don't know how much sense it makes to say that a movie registers on "radar", but this one certainly did. I haven't seen anything to confirm it, but I would be very surprised unless a lot of the people involved (including the director) were gay. Among the factors which supported this growing conviction: Quentin Crisp (author of "The Naked Civil Servant") has a minor role as Frankenstein's co-worker. There a lot of naked male torsos. The casting is also suggestive: While Sting (as Frankenstein) is married, he sure is one hell of a charismatic guy (which I've thought since I first saw him in "The Secret Policeman's (Other) Ball"); the cavalry officer is very pretty (and causes an extra "blip"). Also, the relationship between the Monster and the midget. I'd be interested if other people share my opinion - or have facts. Of course, this is irrelevant in an artistic sense... I found "Bride" worth seeing, but flawed; particularly the direction and acting were weak. But it's an interesting twist on the Frankenstein myth. Not only the people(!), but also the scenery and photography are pretty and colorful. Jennifer Beals plays the Bride; you'll also recognize the midget from "Star Trek" (though I've forgotten his name). (Ooops! Is "midget" the Politically Correct term?) --Per ------- Date: Tue 20 Aug 85 08:06:09-PDT From: John Reuling Subject: Re: "Bride" All true, but you missed the most "obviously" gay pair in the movie: the circus manager and his "assistant." Didn't you notice that they were always together, even at night? In fact, when the assistant (I forget his name) got killed, and all of the cute little muscular blond circus-boys got SO upset, I wondered what we were supposed to think of that. In general an interesting movie, but a little predictable, I thought. -J ------- Date: Tue 20 Aug 85 11:45:25-PDT From: Per Bothner Subject: Re: "Bride" I did notice the circus manager and assistant, at least at the level of my growing awareness of something "funny". I don't think that the predictability of the movie is necessarily a flaw, since it deals with mythic themes - after all we are all very familiar with the Frankenstein story at some level or other. Cumulatively the "gayness" of "Bride" seems pretty un-subtle, but I'd be interested in to what extent straights noticed it. (I went to see it with a straight friend - who by the way I've mentioned various things to that should make him suspect my orientation. Neither of us mentioned anything, but (now to come to the point of this digression) he was somewhat more negative about the movie than I was, describing it as "two stars" to another friend.) --Per