Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ncr-sd.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!greg From: greg@ncr-sd.UUCP (Greg Noel) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: How about these groups? Message-ID: <260@ncr-sd.UUCP> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 16:01:32 EDT Article-I.D.: ncr-sd.260 Posted: Thu Aug 15 16:01:32 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 22:41:01 EDT References: <80@axiom.UUCP> Reply-To: greg@ncr-sd.UUCP (Greg Noel) Organization: NCR Corporation, Torrey Pines Lines: 17 In article <80@axiom.UUCP> smk@axiom.UUCP (Steven M. Kramer) writes: >How about: > mod.map.arpa > mod.map.bitnet > mod.map.csnet Although I agree with the usefulness of having the maps for the various interconnected networks available for pathalias to munch on, I disagree that there should be a separate newsgroup for each one. In fact, since mod.map.uucp is the only subgroup of mod.map, I would suggest removing mod.map.uucp and put \all/ of the mapping-related traffic in mod.map, including the ARPAnet (BITNET, CSnet, DECnet, etc.) connectivity data, which is all that's required (no site information is needed unless the site is also connected via UUCP). How's that, Spaf? Another newsgroup you can nuke! -- -- Greg Noel, NCR Rancho Bernardo Greg@ncr-sd.UUCP or Greg@nosc.ARPA