Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Procyon's Promise & antimatter black holes
Message-ID: <1237@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 18:50:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1237
Posted: Wed Aug 14 18:50:31 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 22:13:26 EDT
References: <320@baylor.UUCP> <1491@shark.UUCP> <313@ttrdc.UUCP> <560@mmintl.UUCP> <1497@shark.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 13
Xref: linus net.books:2060 net.sf-lovers:8393

Isn't everyone missing the point anyway?  Procyon's Promise (and
Life Probe) are predicated on the idea that when we actually go
out and *observe* black holes ``directly'', we won't find what we
expect.

Have you checked your antimatter black hole recently?

(Not that I expect later observations to disagree with current
theories, but I think everyone's going a bit overboard here.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 4251)
UUCP:	seismo!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris@maryland