Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter
From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Re: Seatbelts for passengers
Message-ID: <403@baylor.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 13:18:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: baylor.403
Posted: Thu Aug 15 13:18:19 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 08:33:53 EDT
References: <535@brl-tgr.ARPA> <870@mtuxo.UUCP> <639@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria
Lines: 7
Xref: watmath net.auto:7726 net.legal:2112

I think the reason for including front seat passengers only is because rear
seat belts are typically lap belts and very little protection in an accident.
Personally I favor the insurance company solution to the problem.
-- 
	Peter da Silva (the mad Australian)
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076