Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site hlwpc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!mhuxh!hlexa!hlwpc!cb From: cb@hlwpc.UUCP (Carl Blesch) Newsgroups: net.misc.coke Subject: Re: Sugar Lobby Fights Back Message-ID: <591@hlwpc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 09:07:27 EDT Article-I.D.: hlwpc.591 Posted: Thu Aug 22 09:07:27 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 17:53:47 EDT References: <470@lasspvax.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Short Hills, NJ Lines: 11 > Did anyone else notice the full-page ad in the New York Times from the Sugar > Association in regard to the Sugar vs. HFCS debate. It seems that they are > looking for support from the New Coke controversy to bring back 100% sugar in > sodas. No, I didn't see the ad, but Newsweek mentioned the ad in their recent cover story on sugar addiction. Newsweek reports that the sugar industry is trying to create a "snob appeal" for sugar -- that "finer" products will contain 100% sugar, and as a result, you will seek these products. Carl Blesch