Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site grkermi.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!grkermi!andrew From: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.auto,net.legal Subject: Re: DWI Crackdowns and Car Confiscation Message-ID: <546@grkermi.UUCP> Date: Sat, 10-Aug-85 21:37:54 EDT Article-I.D.: grkermi.546 Posted: Sat Aug 10 21:37:54 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 23:36:15 EDT References: <264@SCIRTP.UUCP> <624@ttidcc.UUCP> <123@unc.unc.UUCP> Reply-To: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers) Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass. Lines: 14 Xref: linus net.flame:10616 net.auto:6562 net.legal:1667 Summary: In article <123@unc.unc.UUCP> fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) writes: >By the way, drunk driving, with all its dangers, has been around for decades. >Why did everybody wait till the last couple of years to jump on the >anti-drunk-driving bandwagon? Is this the new fad of the year? Because the right-wing lunatics are trying to blame everything on the so-called "liberals" (you know, the ones who advocate "permissiveness", whatever that is). The aforementioned "liberals" are running scared (as you would if you were being outspent by an order of magnitude) and are so afraid of being called "soft" on crime/Communism/whatever that they capitulate. Just ask [Mass. governor] Mike Dukakis, who at one time had enough integrity to resist such demagoguery! (Or any of the House members who switched their votes on aid to the contras!) AWR