Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 SMI; site emacs.uucp
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!cca!emacs!pz
From: pz@emacs.uucp (Paul Czarnecki)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Marrying UP
Message-ID: <127@emacs.uucp>
Date: Thu, 25-Jul-85 13:00:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: emacs.127
Posted: Thu Jul 25 13:00:34 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 00:31:42 EDT
References: <3068@decwrl.UUCP>  <586@unc.UUCP>
Reply-To: pz@emacs.UUCP (Paul Czarnecki)
Organization: CCA Uniworks, Wellesley, MA
Lines: 30
Keywords: names marry women alphabet
Summary: alphabet

In article <586@unc.UUCP> fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) writes:
>In article  andy@Shasta.ARPA writes:
>>
>>There seems to be an unspoken agreement as to which way's up. [...]
>>The proverbial mother's list I know is based on occupation
>>ordered by median income.
>
>[...] Don't forget height.

:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

My pet theory is that women want to move up alphabetically.  The closer
to the head of the alphabet your are, the "better" you catch is.  I
think that when my wife moved from a "Welch" to a "Czarnecki" she did
pretty good.

Oh no!  But what will our (future) daughters do?

(For those of you who want to flame that a woman doesn't HAVE to change her
name when she marries and that I am a horrible cretin for forcing my
wife to accept such a concise melodious name like "Czarnecki", consider
the fact that she wanted my name voluntarily.  It was a decision that
she made.  (and I don't necessarily approve of))
-- 
-- Laying here, Lyin' in bed.

   Paul Czarnecki
   Uniworks			decvax!{wanginst!infinet, cca}!emacs!pz
   20 William Street		emacs!pz@cca-unix.ARPA
   Wellesley, MA 02181		(617) 235-2600