Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!eric
From: eric@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Eric Lavitsky)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac,net.micro
Subject: Re: Amiga vs Mac
Message-ID: <3241@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 07:45:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3241
Posted: Mon Aug 12 07:45:40 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 01:32:28 EDT
References: <8883@ritcv.UUCP> <26700024@inmet.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 20
Xref: linus net.micro.mac:2339 net.micro:10211

In article <26700024@inmet.UUCP>, bhyde@inmet.UUCP writes:
> 
>  I for one am very happy not to have any discussion of the
>  Amiga in this news group...  "The Amiga?  That's the machine
>  that one ups the MacIntosh right, more memory, more sound, more
>  color, even has less software than the Mac did when it was introduced."
>  ben hyde, cambridge

Eh?, you'd better get your facts straight. The Amiga will have 20+ 
packages available upon release - I've seen many of them. How many
did the Mac have? 2...3? All I can remember are MacPaint and MacWrite -
care to refresh my memory as to the other 20?

Eric
-- 

ARPA:	LAVITSKY@RUTGERS
UUCP:	...{harvard,seismo,ut-sally,sri-iu,ihnp4}!topaz!eric
SNAIL:	16 Oak St., Flr 2
	New Brunswick, NJ  08903