Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-bill.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!brad
From: brad@gcc-bill.ARPA (Brad Parker)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: MegaMax C & assembler (problem)
Message-ID: <281@gcc-bill.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 08:18:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: gcc-bill.281
Posted: Thu Aug 15 08:18:12 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 07:27:53 EDT
References: <1089@cbdkc1.UUCP> <2242@ut-ngp.UTEXAS>
Reply-To: brad@gcc-bill.UUCP (Brad Parker)
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma (Home of the HyperDrive)
Lines: 25

In article <2242@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> rick@ut-ngp.UTEXAS (Rick Watson) writes:
>
>I have a working version of the MacinTalk interface for MegaMax C
>that I got by disassembling the interface that runs under the
>Workshop.  Can anyone comment on the legality of posting of such
>code, since it is 95% Apple code...

Speaking of which, what ever happened to the "object file/object library"
which Apple was supposed to provide to all of the compiler developers?
This was suppose to give us a standard object format so we wouldn't have to
waste our time dissassembling and reassembling module interfaces (like
AppleTalk and MacInTalk).

I heard this touted by Tech Support (which is at the beach till monday!)
many months ago and since then I've heard nothing.

(mild flame - you should hear me when I really get worked up ;-)

-- 

J Bradford Parker
uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!brad

"She said you know how to spell AUDACIOUSLY? I could tell I was in love...
You want to go to heaven? or would you rather not be saved?" - Lloyd Coal