Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!sdcrdcf!faigin From: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel Faigin) Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: Has anyone ever found North Dakota Message-ID: <2248@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 20:55:18 EDT Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2248 Posted: Wed Aug 14 20:55:18 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 08:25:31 EDT References: <650@utai.UUCP> Reply-To: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel Faigin) Followup-To: net.bizarre Distribution: net Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica Lines: 32 Keywords: wyoming Summary: Summary: Followup-To: net.bizare,net.bizarre,net.bizzarre In article <650@utai.UUCP> perelgut@utai.UUCP (Stephen Perelgut) writes: > Has anyone ever found North Dakota? Actually, it is Wyoming that does not exist. (I think N. Dakota is just in the State of Confusion... or was that Idiocy). According to something I heard, Wyoming is there just to fill out the map. It has a nice shape; it looks good. But, it is all wasteland. No one is from there (or will admit to being from there). Wyoming just doesn't exist. Daniel. P.S.: Maybe, just the entire northern central western part of the US doesn't exist. You know, states like Idaho, N. Dakota, Wyoming, Minnesota. Then, there are places that we wish didn't exist. Like Detroit. P.P.S.: Should this discussion be in net.bizarre? DPF -- UUCP: {akgua allegra ihnp4 hplabs sdcsvax trwrb cbosgd}!sdcrdcf!faigin ARPA: sdcrdcf!faigin@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA --or-- sdcrdcf!faigin@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU W: SDC, 2500 Colorado MD 52-46; Santa Monica CA 90406; (213) 820-4111 x6493 H: 11743 Darlington Avenue #9; Los Angeles CA 90049; (213) 826-3357 The views and opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of my employer, except the janitor who agrees with everything I write. I hope for his early recovery and release.