Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site poseidon.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!pegasus!phoenix!poseidon!josie From: josie@poseidon.UUCP (Jack Gross) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: time for me to leave Message-ID: <1270@poseidon.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 11:43:22 EDT Article-I.D.: poseidon.1270 Posted: Fri Aug 23 11:43:22 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 12:55:54 EDT References: <1643@akgua.UUCP> <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Lincroft NJ Lines: 34 >I agree. I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of >the other. I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech. Any others more >opinions out there on this? Lets hear it for net.auto.tech. Im sick and tired of having to skip over all the stupid articles about avoiding the law and other illegal acts. I don't like the fact that there is a 55 MPH limit, but thats life. I guess if I owned a rader detector I would also invent a method to rob banks. As long as I don't get caught why should anyone mind, the FDIC will cover the losses ? It is a fact that highway fatalities are much lower with a 55 MPH limit. I resent those who feel that they have superior driving capabilities and that "they" can control their car at higher speeds as well as I can at the limit. Maybe we should all be required to take a speed test. Each state could license drivers for different speed ratings, dependent on each persons reflexes. Then all of those fools that think that they are better than the rest of us can go and kill themselfs like a bunch of race car drivers. I will still read the net, but only because I like the topic of automobile's. In reality radar DWI and all other illegal activities should be on their own net. How about net.murder or net.crook ? Jack Gross