Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!burl!clyde!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!herbie
From: herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong - DCS)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: CD player differences
Message-ID: <1606@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 09:52:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1606
Posted: Wed Aug 14 09:52:32 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Aug-85 05:45:23 EDT
References: <4934@allegra.UUCP>
Reply-To: herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong - DCS)
Organization: U of Waterloo
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <4934@allegra.UUCP> dep@allegra.UUCP (Dewayne Perry) writes:
>But, what about things like imaging?  
>When I compared an NAD with a Mission cd player - at roughly the
>same volume - the imaging was quite different.  The singer was on
>the floor with the NAD and standing up with the Mission.  Can that
>be a function of a slight difference in loudness?

a difference in frequency respsonse could account for the perceived
differences in imaging.  if the drivers are sufficiently far apart
and the spectral content of the music appropriate, the difference in
dispersion of the drivers between two speaker designs can cause
differences in imaging.

Herb Chong...

I'm user-friendly -- I don't byte, I nybble....

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra|clyde}!watmath!water!watdcsu!herbie
CSNET: herbie%watdcsu@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  herbie%watdcsu%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
NETNORTH, BITNET, EARN: herbie@watdcs, herbie@watdcsu