Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site galbp.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!akgua!akgub!galbp!wolf From: wolf@galbp.UUCP (Wolf Herda) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: PMS Message-ID: <191@galbp.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 18:20:01 EDT Article-I.D.: galbp.191 Posted: Thu Aug 8 18:20:01 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 21:44:11 EDT References: <> Reply-To: wolf@galbp.UUCP (Wolf Herda) Organization: Lanier Business Products, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia Lines: 43 In article <> nap@druxo.UUCP (ParsonsNA) writes: > >> Ross: >> Seriously, each of us has seen some women who was not as effective at her >> job around the time of her period due to these PMS. If you were in a >> hiring position, would you want to hire someone who (for a few days each >> month) *might* not be as effective as a man? > >Would you want to hire someone who (at any time during the month) *might* >not be as effective as a woman? > >Seriously, I cannot recall noticing any woman's effectiveness decreasing >at the time of her period enough to be noticeable, other than one >occasionally saying she didn't feel good. If she felt bad enough, she went >home and made up her time later. Is this what you mean by "not as >effective as a man"? > >On the other hand, I have seen any number of men who were frequently >ineffective in their jobs due to their uncontrolled interest in the >opposite sex. > >By the way, is there a reason that you use the plural form "women" to >refer to the singular "woman"? > >> I highly doubt that Time Inc. they would make me their spokesperson. > >One reason I respect Time Inc. :-) > >Nancy Parsons >AT&T ISL I never thought any woman was ever as effective as a man, even when she's not in her period. We need to go back to the days when the women are in the kitchen and not on the net! -- Wolf Herda Lanier Business Products, Inc. {gatech,akgua,akgub}!galbp!wolf (404) 329-8254