Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!chris From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek) Newsgroups: net.books,net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Procyon's Promise & antimatter black holes Message-ID: <1237@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 18:50:31 EDT Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1237 Posted: Wed Aug 14 18:50:31 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 22:13:26 EDT References: <320@baylor.UUCP> <1491@shark.UUCP> <313@ttrdc.UUCP> <560@mmintl.UUCP> <1497@shark.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 13 Xref: linus net.books:2060 net.sf-lovers:8393 Isn't everyone missing the point anyway? Procyon's Promise (and Life Probe) are predicated on the idea that when we actually go out and *observe* black holes ``directly'', we won't find what we expect. Have you checked your antimatter black hole recently? (Not that I expect later observations to disagree with current theories, but I think everyone's going a bit overboard here.) -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 4251) UUCP: seismo!umcp-cs!chris CSNet: chris@umcp-cs ARPA: chris@maryland