Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!qantel!ihnp4!ihlpl!par
From: par@ihlpl.UUCP (Rupsis)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: About Literalism: The authors of Scripture.
Message-ID: <275@ihlpl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 13:41:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpl.275
Posted: Fri Aug  9 13:41:38 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Aug-85 01:49:09 EDT
References: <2194@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1050@umcp-cs.UUCP> <2222@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <498@utastro.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 22


 
> There is a third theory that is convincing to me: Scripture was written
> by men, and like all things written by men, it contains errors.  There,
> now, that wasn't so bad, was it?
> 
> 	Bill Jefferys  

I guess the writer of Hebrews didn't quite agree with that theory. When 
quoting Psalm 95 the writer says:
 
	  "Therefore, just as the Holy Spirit says,
	  'TODAY IF YOU HEAR HIS VOICE,...'" (Hebrews 3:7 NASB)

The writer of Hebrews actually thought that the Holy Spirit
was the author of Psalm 95. What a fool! Everyone knows that 
Scripture was written by men. (and men alone?)

			 Paul Rupsis

"But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they 
are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them" (1 Corintians 2:14)