Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!vijay From: vijay@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (P. Vijay) Newsgroups: net.emacs Subject: Re: Unipress and Gnumacs Message-ID: <3300@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Fri, 16-Aug-85 00:06:54 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.3300 Posted: Fri Aug 16 00:06:54 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 04:42:17 EDT References: <4919@mit-eddie.UUCP> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 23 Summary: This is getting a little too ridiculous.... I have been seeing a number of postings indicating that they (the posters) were quite offended by the statement made by Richard Mlynarik in the following article. In article <4919@mit-eddie.UUCP>, mly@mit-prep writes: > [He was answering someone's posting that indicated that Unipress > had been called the 'bad guys' for too long, and it was time that > it was shown appreciation for its stand, as indicated by an > official statement by Mike Gallaher] > > However, I think that you will find that Unipress itself is as slimey as > any other corporation in the business --- don't let one good > impression spoil their image! =;-) If *you* (the offendee) has not as yet noticed, this paragraph was clearly marked with a 'smiley face'. This is supposed to indicate that all that stuff about "slimey corporations" is meant to be in the lighter vein, i.e. funny. You may not appreciate the humour, but at least before unloading your offended sense of propriety, *PLEASE* re-read the message and then say whatever you have to. --Vijay--