Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!woods From: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) Newsgroups: net.consumers Subject: Re: Telephone Rate Hike - Pacific Bell Message-ID: <1693@hao.UUCP> Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 13:30:26 EDT Article-I.D.: hao.1693 Posted: Mon Aug 12 13:30:26 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 04:01:07 EDT References: <1845@amdahl.UUCP> <69600027@hp-pcd.UUCP> <10892@rochester.UUCP> <308@tove.UUCP> <1201@cae780.UUCP> Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 9 > Although >it is a state (vs. Federal) issue, it is never legal to record if neither party > is aware of it That is almost true, but not quite. Conversations with neither party aware CAN be recorded, but it requires a court order, which in most cases requires grounds for "reasonable suspicion" that a crime has been or will be committed. --Greg