Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekla.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!teklds!dadla!tekla!brianc
From: brianc@tekla.UUCP (Brian Conley)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Rape (A Solution)
Message-ID: <305@tekla.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 11:25:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekla.305
Posted: Thu Aug 15 11:25:28 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 03:26:17 EDT
References: <25100002@smu> <25100003@smu> <148@denelcor.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 18

> > I am not proposing video cameras in the home.  First of all, they
> > would not be cost effective since at least one would be needed
> > for each household while cameras monitoring the streets would serve
> > many house holds.
> 
> Lyle McElhaney
> ...denelcor!lmc
> 
> PS: Oh, and if you think that the cameras on the street corners just won't
> work out for any of the reasons cited, I urge you to consider what the
> costs of foot/car patrol labor are to do the equivalent surveilance,
> look around in your favorite mall, and put two and two together. They'll
> be there, soon.

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
Yes Lyle, but just because someone is watching does not mean that they 
will be able to react in time (i.e. get to the scene of the crime) in
time to save your skin.  Unless the camera is hand held by a police officer.