Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!mooremj From: mooremj@EGLIN-VAX Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: A Modest Proposal Message-ID: <3321@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 20:10:14 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.3321 Posted: Sat Aug 17 20:10:14 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 06:05:54 EDT Sender: daemon@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 15 From: mooremj@EGLIN-VAX I am in the same boat as Paula Sanch[ez?]; my mailer doesn't undigestify, and sometimes I have to read at 300 baud. Those *long* critical articles, which don't especially interest me, seem to take forever. On the other hand, I feel that anyone with a valid point on SF should be allowed to post (though I might make an exception on Davis Tucker's vituperative post in #326.) I propose that long critical articles be saved and sent out in single-topic issues, and not in other issues. This has been done with other topics in the past. That way, those who are interested will have a whole issue to play with, and those who are not can flush the issue. How about it, Saul? marty moore (mooremj@eglin-vax.arpa)