Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!chris From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek) Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Re: Mail addressing and routing Message-ID: <1159@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 08:55:30 EDT Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1159 Posted: Thu Aug 8 08:55:30 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Aug-85 06:21:54 EDT References: <644@adobe.UUCP> <734@vortex.UUCP> <1156@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 13 Whoops, last point (I promise!---at least until someone starts arguing): if one uses my scheme and has an empty "partial routes for domains" database, then the situation is just like when we used to just look up the uucp hostname in the flat-namespace-database (which is what we are doing right now). If both db's are empty, then the situation is like it was under V7: one must always use full routes, rather than domainified names. (Sorry about the typo (it's shanghaied, not shanghaid)....) -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 4251) UUCP: seismo!umcp-cs!chris CSNet: chris@umcp-cs ARPA: chris@maryland