Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1h.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass
From: parnass@ihu1h.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Radar Detector Legislation (JAMMING radar)
Message-ID: <663@ihu1h.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 09:03:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihu1h.663
Posted: Wed Aug 21 09:03:25 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 13:27:40 EDT
References: <> <214@proper.UUCP> <781@dataio.UUCP> <354@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 39
Xref: watmath net.auto:7777 net.legal:2140

x
       Seems like we had this discussion 2 years  ago  on  the
       net.

       Using radar jamming equipment to	foil traffic radar  is
       in violation of several federal and international regu-
       lations:

	  - FCC	Rules &	Regulations:

	       - R&R 89.51 - Station Authorization Required.

	       - R&R 89.117 -  Acceptability  of  Transmitters
		 for Licensing

	  - Communications Act of 1934:

	       - Sec 324 - Use of Minimum Power

	  - International Telecommunications  Commission  Con-
	    vention 1947:

	       - Article 44 - Harmful Interference

	  - International Radio	 Regulations  Annexed  to  the
	    International Telecommunications Convention	1947:

	       - Article 13 -  Unnecessary  transmissions  and
		 superfluous signals

	       - Article 22 - Station license

	  - Geneva Treaty 1959:

	       - Article 1 Sec 3 - Harmful interference

-- 
===============================================================================
Bob Parnass,  Bell Telephone Laboratories - ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass - (312)979-5414