Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site timeinc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!timeinc!greenber From: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: PMS Message-ID: <417@timeinc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 09:14:12 EDT Article-I.D.: timeinc.417 Posted: Sat Aug 17 09:14:12 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 05:33:59 EDT References: <3688@decwrl.UUCP> Reply-To: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) Organization: Time, Inc. - New York Lines: 38 Summary: In article <3688@decwrl.UUCP> chabot@miles.DEC writes: > > >Ross, you must meet a lot of males who experience PMS, no? I must, if I >follow those rules. > >No, it's not reasonable to assume that because of a temporary change >in personality that a woman may be suffering from PMS. It's actually pretty >rude behavior to make such arbitrary assumptions. > Lisa, later on I can tell you in a private posting about the differences between the sexes. It might fascinate you, will probably scare you, and if you pay someone enough, they'll help you with the big words. I've never met a man who experiences PMS, just like I've never met a women who gets an erection. Oh, there might be similiar aspects of each that someone who doesn't enjoy finding bad in themself will certainly deny. I won't deny that men and women share the same hassles in life. But *some* women may also suffer from PMS. But, to you at least, there ain't no such thing as PMS. Perhaps you have a problem recognizing it in others because you always seem to be in a state of irritability. But just denying that PMS exists doesn't make any sense to me. But that holds with most of your postings. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ross M. Greenberg @ Time Inc, New York --------->{vax135 | ihnp4}!timeinc!greenber<--------- I highly doubt that Time Inc. would make me their spokesperson. ---