Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site drux3.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!drux3!vlv From: vlv@drux3.UUCP (Vaughn Vernon) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: New Xenix Languages from MS Message-ID: <1350@drux3.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 20:11:33 EDT Article-I.D.: drux3.1350 Posted: Tue Aug 20 20:11:33 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 01:25:16 EDT Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 26 Hey netland! Remember I made a comment that Microsoft was really doing some nice things with their languages ( MSC 3.0 )? Now Microsoft is offering Xenix versions of all of their languages that are currently supported under MS-DOS! This appears to be source code compatibility (ver. object code). 'C' 3.0 provides relocatable object (not executable) module Xenix compatibility! The new Xenix languages announced in the Tech Journal are: *Fortran, Pascal, Cobol and Basic* The blurb states that programs can be converted with little or no changes. I wonder if the *little* changes have to do mostly with non-protected memory dependant things like writing directly to video memory. How is such a thing taken care of under Xenix? Or is it? Disclaimmer: I have no connections with Microsoft. I just like their recent style. Vaughn Vernon AT&T ISL Denver, CO ihnp4!drutx!{drux1 | drux3}!vlv