Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!msds From: msds@drutx.UUCP (SimmonsMW) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Fetus versus Cancer Message-ID: <105@drutx.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 16:56:49 EDT Article-I.D.: drutx.105 Posted: Thu Aug 8 16:56:49 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 05:34:53 EDT Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 18 I once new a women who had cancer and also a fetus. After much thought about the situation, she decided to have the fetus removed instead of the cancer. She knew that kids would be a lot more trouble to take care than the cancer after all cancer will take care of its self and the kids wouldn't. The only way you could even compare a fetus to cancer or a bad kidney would be if the fetus was threating the life of the mother. Cancer is life threating a bad kidney or other organs that don't function could be life threating, but a fetus come on abortion is cold blooded MURDER!! No matter how you try to justify it, it is wrong. If a fetus is growing it is living and it is not destroying cells like cancer so it can not be even considered in the same category as cancer.