Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site aero.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!aero!foy
From: foy@aero.ARPA (Richard Foy)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Torek's SECOND ANNUAL CONCLUSIVE ARGUMENT :->
Message-ID: <392@aero.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 17:03:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: aero.392
Posted: Thu Aug 22 17:03:49 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 13:48:37 EDT
References: <789@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1012@noscvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy)
Organization: The Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 9
Summary: 

In article <390@oliven.UUCP> barb@oliven.UUCP (Barbara Jernigan) writes:
>
>But do we really 'own' our own bodies?  If we do, why are there laws
>against suicide -- as well as against a multitude of other self-harming 
>possibilities -- protecting us from ourselves, as it were?  Chew on the
>ramifications of THAT for a while.
>
Could it be that many people like to control other people?
 richard foy