Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site moncol.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!moncol!john
From: john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Hugs, etc.
Message-ID: <474@moncol.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 18-Aug-85 22:33:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: moncol.474
Posted: Sun Aug 18 22:33:13 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:24:15 EDT
References: <15500012@uiucdcsp> <470@moncol.UUCP> <368@ttrdc.UUCP>
Organization: Monmouth College, West Long Branch, NJ 07764
Lines: 39

]From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
]Message-ID: <368@ttrdc.UUCP>
]Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL
]
]In article <470@moncol.UUCP>, john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) writes:
]
]>Great idea! Does anyone know of a way to illustrate a hug via e-mail? We
]>have the ubiquitous smiley face :-) and all it's variations, but I've never
]>seen a good way to represent a hug.
]
]How about something like:
]
]<_0_>
]
](Imagine if you will the embracing arms.  This is the best I could think of
]at the moment which only occupies one line, as the smiley face does.  Maybe
]there is a better "hug" someone else can think of, perhaps one which uses
]more than one line.)

I'm not sure. Waht does everyone else think? It sorta reminds me of a Tie
Fighter. :-)

I have to admit, though, it ain't too bad.

Well, <_0_> 's to all.


-- 
Name:		John Ruschmeyer
US Mail:	Monmouth College, W. Long Branch, NJ 07764
Phone:		(201) 222-6600 x366
UUCP:		...!vax135!petsd!moncol!john	...!princeton!moncol!john
						   ...!pesnta!moncol!john
Disclaimer:
	Monmouth College is a mecca for diverse opinions. It is, therefore,
	highly unlikely that the above opinions are those of anyone but me.

Silly quote:
	Son, you're mixing ponderables again...