Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!vijay
From: vijay@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (P. Vijay)
Newsgroups: net.emacs
Subject: Re: Unipress and Gnumacs
Message-ID: <3300@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Fri, 16-Aug-85 00:06:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3300
Posted: Fri Aug 16 00:06:54 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 04:42:17 EDT
References: <4919@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 23
Summary: This is getting a little too ridiculous....


	I have been seeing a number of postings indicating that they
(the posters) were quite offended by the statement made by Richard
Mlynarik in the following article.

In article <4919@mit-eddie.UUCP>, mly@mit-prep writes:
> [He was answering someone's posting that indicated that Unipress
>  had been called the 'bad guys' for too long, and it was time that
>  it was shown appreciation for its stand, as indicated by an
>  official statement by Mike Gallaher]
> 
> However, I think that you will find that Unipress itself is as slimey as
> any other corporation in the business --- don't let one good
> impression spoil their image! =;-)

	If *you* (the offendee) has not as yet noticed, this paragraph
was clearly marked with a 'smiley face'. This is supposed to indicate
that all that stuff about "slimey corporations" is meant to be in the
lighter vein, i.e. funny. You may not appreciate the humour, but at
least before unloading your offended sense of propriety, *PLEASE*
re-read the message and then say whatever you have to.

						--Vijay--