Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site vax1.fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!jeepcj2a
From: jeepcj2a@fluke.UUCP (Dale Chaudiere)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: time for me to leave
Message-ID: <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 10:09:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1129
Posted: Thu Aug 22 10:09:14 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 17:46:49 EDT
References: <1643@akgua.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 24

> >   Sorry, but I think that it's time for me to fly and leave this newsgroup.
> >Over the last two months I have been reading the group and I find it getting
> >quite boring.  I personally feel that most of the stuff that gets posted 
> >these days belongs in net.consumers or net.legal.  Well, time for me to hit
> >the Big U...bye...
> >     Adrian Zannin
> 
> I assume  Adrian is refering the discussions on DWI, 55 MPH speed limit,
> the legality (morality?) of radar detectors etc that have been the 
> subject of a lot of the postings recently.
> Maybe what we need is a new group, net.auto.tech where technical 
> discussions can be posted.  You know - "my 83 Ford/Chevy/whatever does
> this etc etc. Help"  Then the opinion/philosophy discussions can remain
> in net.auto, but those who are only interested in the technical info
> won't have to wade through rest of the articles.
> 
> Mike Graham @AT&T Technologies 
> Atlanta, Georgia
> (Norcross really, but who ever heard of Norcross.)
> akgua!mlg

I agree.  I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of
the other.  I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech.  Any others more
opinions out there on this?