Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: ls -C considered harmful (really ls follies) Message-ID: <714@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 05:34:06 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.714 Posted: Thu Aug 15 05:34:06 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 04:52:55 EDT References: <3123@nsc.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 5 > Do you realize that for all the billions and billions of options hacked > into ls, I've never seen a version of ls that can sort files based on size? > shoe size of the programmer maybe, but never file size.... But there are no letters left. Oh, maybe we can use "ls -%". :-)