Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Version 1.0 Netnews CMS/BITNET 5/19/85; site PSUVM.BITNET
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!gmp
From: GMP@psuvm.BITNET
Newsgroups: net.med
Subject: Re: The Perils of Nutrasweet (actually, sugar)
Message-ID: <2086GMP@psuvm>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 10:53:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.2086GMP
Posted: Thu Aug 15 10:53:37 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 08:42:44 EDT
References: <771@burl.UUCP> <394@petrus.UUCP> <192@omen.UUCP> <780@inuxd.UUCP> <2991@nsc.UUCP> <273@bbnccv.UUCP> <198@omen.UUCP> <22
Lines: 10

A comment from the diabetics.  There are some of us who simply can t eat sugar.
The issue is not obesity, it is death.  I am intrigued with the argument, and
appalled by the insensitivity.  Not only is there the contempt of vanity but
there is the intolerance of the divergent.  Computing is no haven for the
humanist.  Most of you are bigoted on behalf of your science that you have no
sense of life.  I guess I should have put this on net.flame, but your rules are
so idiosyncratically rigid that frankly there's no real point to trying to figu
re them out.  Reply if you can explain who on earth writes some of these tediou
s moralities.  gmp@psuvm