Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.auto
Subject: Re: Uninsured motorism
Message-ID: <653@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 22:10:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.653
Posted: Wed Aug 14 22:10:21 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 01:46:45 EDT
References: <202@SCIRTP.UUCP> <378@kontron.UUCP> <586@ttidcc.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Distribution: net
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 19
Xref: linus net.legal:1724 net.auto:6653

In article <748@lsuc.UUCP> msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) writes:
>
>Which suggests that, in jurisdictions where motorists are allowed
>not to have insurance (that's most of them in North America, isn't it?),
>insurance companies should sell policies that protect you not only
>against your own liability but also against that of the uninsured
>driver who runs into you.
>
	As a matter of fact, this is quite standard, even in states
where liability insurance is required by law(such as California).
I have had Uninsured Driver insurance since I first owned a car!
The main problem with it is of course the deductible and the maximum
coverage. It also adds a small amount to your premiums.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

{trwrb|allegra|cbosgd|hplabs|ihnp4|aero!uscvax!akgua}!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
or {ttdica|quad1|bellcore|scgvaxd}!psivax!friesen