Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site im4u.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!riddle From: riddle@im4u.UUCP Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: "Non-gay homosexuals" Message-ID: <437@im4u.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 10:35:40 EDT Article-I.D.: im4u.437 Posted: Tue Aug 20 10:35:40 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 23-Aug-85 04:57:14 EDT References: <1302@hound.UUCP> <1220@ubc-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: riddle@im4u.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) Organization: U. of Tx. at Houston-in-the-Hills Lines: 13 Re: Bisexuality anyone? Dead-Horse-Ophile: "Bob" >> At the risk of flogging a dead horse, let me suggest yet another reason why >> we should prefer ''gay'' to ''homosexual''. I have known gay bisexuals, >> non-gay bisexuals, and (strangest of the lot) non-gay homosexuals. It all >> has to do with how you identify yourself, not whom you sleep with. Whoops, I must have missed something. "Non-gay homosexuals"? Apparently you're making a denotative distinction here between "gay" and "homosexual" (as opposed to all the connotative distinctions that have already been made in this newsgroup). Can you clarify? --- Prentiss Riddle ("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.") --- {ihnp4,harvard,seismo,gatech}!ut-sally!riddle riddle@ut-sally.UUCP --- riddle@ut-sally.ARPA, riddle%zotz@ut-sally, riddle%im4u@ut-sally