Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-bill.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!brad From: brad@gcc-bill.ARPA (Brad Parker) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: MegaMax C & assembler (problem) Message-ID: <281@gcc-bill.ARPA> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 08:18:12 EDT Article-I.D.: gcc-bill.281 Posted: Thu Aug 15 08:18:12 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 07:27:53 EDT References: <1089@cbdkc1.UUCP> <2242@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> Reply-To: brad@gcc-bill.UUCP (Brad Parker) Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma (Home of the HyperDrive) Lines: 25 In article <2242@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> rick@ut-ngp.UTEXAS (Rick Watson) writes: > >I have a working version of the MacinTalk interface for MegaMax C >that I got by disassembling the interface that runs under the >Workshop. Can anyone comment on the legality of posting of such >code, since it is 95% Apple code... Speaking of which, what ever happened to the "object file/object library" which Apple was supposed to provide to all of the compiler developers? This was suppose to give us a standard object format so we wouldn't have to waste our time dissassembling and reassembling module interfaces (like AppleTalk and MacInTalk). I heard this touted by Tech Support (which is at the beach till monday!) many months ago and since then I've heard nothing. (mild flame - you should hear me when I really get worked up ;-) -- J Bradford Parker uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!brad "She said you know how to spell AUDACIOUSLY? I could tell I was in love... You want to go to heaven? or would you rather not be saved?" - Lloyd Coal