Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxi!rosberg From: rosberg@ihuxi.UUCP (Rosberg) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: time for me to leave Message-ID: <1250@ihuxi.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 14:39:14 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1250 Posted: Fri Aug 23 14:39:14 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 00:28:00 EDT References: <1643@akgua.UUCP> <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 35 > > > Sorry, but I think that it's time for me to fly and leave this newsgroup. > > >Over the last two months I have been reading the group and I find it getting > > >quite boring. I personally feel that most of the stuff that gets posted > > >these days belongs in net.consumers or net.legal. Well, time for me to hit > > >the Big U...bye... > > > Adrian Zannin > > > > I assume Adrian is refering the discussions on DWI, 55 MPH speed limit, > > the legality (morality?) of radar detectors etc that have been the > > subject of a lot of the postings recently. > > Maybe what we need is a new group, net.auto.tech where technical > > discussions can be posted. You know - "my 83 Ford/Chevy/whatever does > > this etc etc. Help" Then the opinion/philosophy discussions can remain > > in net.auto, but those who are only interested in the technical info > > won't have to wade through rest of the articles. > > > > Mike Graham @AT&T Technologies > > Atlanta, Georgia > > (Norcross really, but who ever heard of Norcross.) > > akgua!mlg > > I agree. I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of > the other. I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech. Any others more > opinions out there on this? *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***ddd Absolutely...I'm pretty tired of the barracks-lawyer fights... I'd like to find discussions of a more technical nature (ie, how do I get my 66 GTO to handle better?). q . q w !