Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site rocksvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!rocksvax!z
From: z@rocksvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors as a Warning Device
Message-ID: <1900004@rocksvax.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 18:51:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocksvax.1900004
Posted: Sat Aug 17 18:51:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 06:08:19 EDT
References: <1014@hou2h.UUCP>
Lines: 11
Nf-ID: #R:hou2h:-101400:rocksvax:1900004:000:496
Nf-From: rocksvax!z    Aug 17 18:51:00 1985

The use of radar as a warning signal is indeed a good use.  Unfortunately
that would be a misuse of the frequencies according to the FCC.  As I remember
those frequencies are allocated for something like radio ranging and detection.
The use of the frequency for "distress" signals doesn't exactly fall into
this category but then again rules are made to be changed.  Anyone have
their FCC rule books handy?

//Z\\
James M. Ziobro
Ziobro.Henr@Xerox.ARPA
{rochester,amd,sunybcs,allegra}!rocksvax!z