Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site hlwpc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!mhuxh!hlexa!hlwpc!cb
From: cb@hlwpc.UUCP (Carl Blesch)
Newsgroups: net.misc.coke
Subject: Re: Sugar Lobby Fights Back
Message-ID: <591@hlwpc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 09:07:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: hlwpc.591
Posted: Thu Aug 22 09:07:27 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 17:53:47 EDT
References: <470@lasspvax.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Short Hills, NJ
Lines: 11

> Did anyone else notice the full-page ad in the New York Times from the Sugar
> Association in regard to the Sugar vs. HFCS debate.  It seems that they are
> looking for support from the New Coke controversy to bring back 100% sugar in
> sodas.

No, I didn't see the ad, but Newsweek mentioned the ad in their recent
cover story on sugar addiction.  Newsweek reports that the sugar industry
is trying to create a "snob appeal" for sugar -- that "finer" products
will contain 100% sugar, and as a result, you will seek these products.

Carl Blesch