Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!briand From: briand@tekig4.UUCP (Brian Diehm) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: _Back_to_the_Future_ (spoiler) Message-ID: <220@tekig4.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 13:22:44 EDT Article-I.D.: tekig4.220 Posted: Tue Aug 20 13:22:44 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 03:30:23 EDT References: <2706@ut-sally.UUCP> <3336@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 31 > > _Back_to_the_Future_ > > > > by Kelvin Thompson > > > _Back_to_the_Future_ is a bad, confused movie. If there are any doubts > > that Hollywood is still rife with drug abuse, this movie can lay them to > > rest. > > Well, that's it. I'm not going to read any more of these stupid reviews. > Why, you ask? Unnh, no, I didn't need to ask. -ed. > If there is a Kelvin, why doesn't he step forward? *** REPLACE THIS MESS WITH KELVIN'S LINEAGE *** Of course. Kelvin is a cute version of Kelvinator, the warped appliance of a robot producing this stuff. Actually, if you look upon Kelvin's "reviews" as a form of humor. . . { Just Sagans and Sagans of line feeds } . . . they're still pretty sophomoric. Actually, I'm really glad "Kelvin" CAN'T step forward - mobility in such a juvenile AI entity would indeed be a frightening thing! -Brian Diehm Tektronix, Inc. (I'm NOT an officer of the company, so the company is NOT bound by anything I say or sign. . .)