Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site vaxwaller.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!vlsvax1!zehntel!varian!vaxwaller!susan
From: susan@vaxwaller.UUCP (Susan Finkelman)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Morality down the throat
Message-ID: <311@vaxwaller.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 11:49:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: vaxwalle.311
Posted: Mon Aug 12 11:49:46 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 22:26:28 EDT
References: <17@dscvax2.UUCP>
Organization: Varian, Walnut Creek, CA
Lines: 23

> 
> In CA, poor women can get free abortions from state money whereas birth
> control is not free.  Economically, some women see it as making sense
> to abort rather than shield.  Judge for yourself but they do use abortion
> as a birth control method.
> 
Planned Parenthood used to give contraceptives to women without the
means to pay.  I strongly suspect they still do.

> Some do, some don't.  It must be their choice?  It is a last resort?
> People should not be choosing when other people die.  The power is too
> great.  Abortion as a last resort is so inaccurate.  I wish it were true
> but it is not.  By the way, what do you see as alternatives?  Apparently
> you don't believe in adoption.  Lately, I've had resume-like literature
> from couples who are seemingly desparate for an adoption.  They are willing
> to pay and sometimes very well!
> 
> Matt Noah

So now we're talking having babies for money.  Or is it selling humans?
Isn't that slavery?    

Susan Finkelman