Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: ls -C considered harmful (really ls follies)
Message-ID: <714@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 05:34:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.714
Posted: Thu Aug 15 05:34:06 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 04:52:55 EDT
References: <3123@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 5

> Do you realize that for all the billions and billions of options hacked
> into ls, I've never seen a version of ls that can sort files based on size?
> shoe size of the programmer maybe, but never file size.... 

But there are no letters left.  Oh, maybe we can use "ls -%".  :-)