Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxi!rosberg
From: rosberg@ihuxi.UUCP (Rosberg)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: time for me to leave
Message-ID: <1250@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 14:39:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1250
Posted: Fri Aug 23 14:39:14 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 00:28:00 EDT
References: <1643@akgua.UUCP> <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 35

> > >   Sorry, but I think that it's time for me to fly and leave this newsgroup.
> > >Over the last two months I have been reading the group and I find it getting
> > >quite boring.  I personally feel that most of the stuff that gets posted 
> > >these days belongs in net.consumers or net.legal.  Well, time for me to hit
> > >the Big U...bye...
> > >     Adrian Zannin
> > 
> > I assume  Adrian is refering the discussions on DWI, 55 MPH speed limit,
> > the legality (morality?) of radar detectors etc that have been the 
> > subject of a lot of the postings recently.
> > Maybe what we need is a new group, net.auto.tech where technical 
> > discussions can be posted.  You know - "my 83 Ford/Chevy/whatever does
> > this etc etc. Help"  Then the opinion/philosophy discussions can remain
> > in net.auto, but those who are only interested in the technical info
> > won't have to wade through rest of the articles.
> > 
> > Mike Graham @AT&T Technologies 
> > Atlanta, Georgia
> > (Norcross really, but who ever heard of Norcross.)
> > akgua!mlg
> 
> I agree.  I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of
> the other.  I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech.  Any others more
> opinions out there on this?

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***ddd
Absolutely...I'm pretty tired of the barracks-lawyer fights...
I'd like to find discussions of a more technical nature
(ie, how do I get my 66 GTO to handle better?). 
q
.
q
w

!