Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal Subject: Re: Re: Seatbelts for passengers Message-ID: <403@baylor.UUCP> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 13:18:19 EDT Article-I.D.: baylor.403 Posted: Thu Aug 15 13:18:19 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 08:33:53 EDT References: <535@brl-tgr.ARPA> <870@mtuxo.UUCP> <639@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria Lines: 7 Xref: watmath net.auto:7726 net.legal:2112 I think the reason for including front seat passengers only is because rear seat belts are typically lap belts and very little protection in an accident. Personally I favor the insurance company solution to the problem. -- Peter da Silva (the mad Australian) UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076