Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Radar Detectors as a Warning Device Message-ID: <901@ccice5.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 16:46:25 EDT Article-I.D.: ccice5.901 Posted: Fri Aug 23 16:46:25 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 12:10:47 EDT References: <1014@hou2h.UUCP> <41@cbnap.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY Lines: 14 > STOP!! Don't even suggest it. Some one in the Fed. Gov. might hear you. > Besides, they already thought of it. Collision avoidance systems are > being considered as mandatory equipment for heavy trucks and the like. > (can't recall reference, but will search on request) > I'm sure if it passes, cars will be next. If this keeps up, cars will > cost as much as private planes. (Maybe then general aviation will get > some sympathy !) > Regulation Sucks!!! ihnp4!tcbnap!tel > > Don't protect me from myself, if I'm stupid I deserve to die! Fine by me. Just don't let your stupidity take me with you. :-) *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***