Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site mako.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!orca!mako!jans From: jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Mirror Recomendations? (re-posting) Message-ID: <895@mako.UUCP> Date: Wed, 7-Aug-85 14:38:05 EDT Article-I.D.: mako.895 Posted: Wed Aug 7 14:38:05 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 8-Aug-85 02:21:33 EDT Reply-To: jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman) Distribution: na Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 12 Xref: tektronix net.rec.photo:01504 C'mon, folks! Someone out there must be using a mirror lens they like! I got one reply to my previous posting. (Thank you, noscvax!dberg.) I have a conventional 400/5.6 and find it's size keeps it at home. Can anyone tell their experiences with mid-sized mirrors! Any that shine? Is the lack of a diaphragm (depth-of-field control) particularly bothersome? Is the "hot-spot", or corner light fall-off problem that plagued early mirrors still a problem? How about size, weight and handling of your favorite? Email replies will be summarized and re-posted. Don't be bashful. -- :::::: Jan Steinman Box 1000, MS 61-161 (w)503/685-2843 :::::: :::::: tektronix!tekecs!jans Wilsonville, OR 97070 (h)503/657-7703 ::::::