Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!purtell From: purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.singles Subject: Re: Re: Re: marriage = commitment Message-ID: <1799@reed.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 13:36:26 EDT Article-I.D.: reed.1799 Posted: Wed Aug 14 13:36:26 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 04:03:02 EDT References: <508@ttidcc.UUCP> <485@oliveb.UUCP> <684@lll-crg.ARPA> Lines: 39 Xref: watmath net.religion:7408 net.singles:8736 it. > >[Speaker-To-Animals] > >Now now now... don't get excited. I said nothing of the sort about >you, and nowhere in my article does your name even appear! Only the >attribute line from your reply remained. >How can I include an attribute >line when there was none to begin with? All that is necessary for people to think that I posted something is for the attribution line to be there. And the correct attribution line was in the article when I followed up on it. When it says "Lady Godiva writes..." and then is followed by an article, I'd assume that people would think that I wrote it. >So with no personal attack or explicite reference to you made I think >you're jumping the gun a bit. >Once is quite enough and quite frankly >I get a little irritated by people that feel the need to bludgen me >over the head as if I didn't see what was two feet in front of my nose. How much more explicite do you want to get? As far as once being enough, I only posted one article about it. The only reason that I sent a reply to you is that I wasn't sure how frequently you read this newsgroup, and I just wanted to be sure that this was called to your attention. I never claimed that a personal attack was made on me, and if I had agreed, even slightly, with the article, I wouldn't have been upset at all, although I would have still posted a disclaimer. But, really, do you expect me to allow the possibility that people on the net would think that I thought that women should stay home and take care of the kids, etc.? calm and mellow - elizabeth g. purtell (Lady Godiva)