Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!cybvax0!fbp
From: fbp@cybvax0.UUCP (Rick Peralta)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.unix
Subject: Re: ls follies
Message-ID: <695@cybvax0.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 11:40:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: cybvax0.695
Posted: Wed Aug 21 11:40:55 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 13:47:34 EDT
References: <3123@nsc.UUCP> <1803@reed.UUCP> <321@luke.UUCP>
Reply-To: fbp@cybvax0.UUCP (Rick Peralta)
Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.unix-wizards:14480 net.unix:5430
Summary: 

In article <321@luke.UUCP> you write:
>>  What gets me is there is no way to convince ls to produce _unsorted_ 
>>output!  (never mind why...
>

How about ls -f.

By the way why does -f have to turn off -l and about everything else ?
Please followup in net.unix.


Rick  ...!cybvax0[!dmc0]!fbp

"A likely story.  I don't believe a word of it."