Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!stevenh
From: stevenh@tekig4.UUCP (Steve Herring)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: More Newsgroup Changes
Message-ID: <227@tekig4.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 13:06:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekig4.227
Posted: Fri Aug 23 13:06:06 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 13:43:33 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 26

>
> Suggestion 2:  move "net.astro" to "net.sci.astro"
> Suggestion 3:  move "net.physics" to "net.sci.physics"
> Suggestion 4:  move "net.space" to "net.sci.space"
> Suggestion 6:  drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4)

I think these four groups are doing just fine the way they are. These groups
have enough traffic that they should be their own groups and not be subgroups.

Please do not drop net.columbia. It has enough traffic to warrant it's own
group. I also don't think that the readers of net.space (those that don't 
subscribe to net.columbia) would like to have this merger. I also think that
net.columbia is one of those groups that a lot of people read but not a lot
of people post to.

Net.columbia is an ideal group right now. It contains detailed, informative
info on the space shuttles without a lot of "garbage" and "bs" like net.space 
has. Net.columbia has one of the most mature followings on the net. I wish all
groups were like this. Don't mess with a group that works.

> Suggestion 7:  move "net.abortion" to "net.flame.abortion"
> Suggestion 8:  move "net.origins" to "net.flame.origins"
These are jokes right?

Steve Herring
...!tektronix!tekig4!stevenh