Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site cae780.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!cae780!alan
From: alan@cae780.UUCP (Alan M. Steinberg)
Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish
Subject: Re: What is happening?
Message-ID: <1197@cae780.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Aug-85 02:23:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: cae780.1197
Posted: Wed Aug  7 02:23:14 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Aug-85 20:41:41 EDT
References: <447@ittvax.ATC.ITT.UUCP>
Reply-To: alan@cae780.UUCP (Alan M. Steinberg)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc. (CAE Systems Division), Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 21

>Two weeks ago I read in the Jewish Chronicle (an English weekly) that two women
>had brought lawsuits against Mohels.  Not because they did a "bad job," but
>because they performed Brit Milea in the first place.  One of the women was
>the wife of the Berkeley Hillel Rabbi, so said the article.I know there are 
>cases when Brit Milea is not permitted, but according to the article, the 
>women were saying that performing this mitzva disfigured the baby's body.  

The report is factual.  This caused a barrage of letters to the editor of
the Northern California Jewish Bulletin, mainly from supporters of Brit Milah.
The rabbi's wife was going to sue as guardian of the baby, because the child
was not old enough to make such a decision of religious commitment with the
bodily sacrifice.  It was claimed that the child's suffering was a traumatic
experience which would affect him for life (is that why us male Jews are
so strange? :-) ). In the wake of all the negative publicity, the law suits 
were dropped.
-- 
           
                             Alan Steinberg
                             {ucbvax}!decwrl!amdcad!cae780!alan

Helllllp, Mr. Wizarrrrrrd!!!  I don't want to be a programmer anymoooore..."