Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unc.unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!unc!fsks
From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Madonna
Message-ID: <122@unc.unc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 22:38:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.122
Posted: Fri Aug  9 22:38:49 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 07:22:07 EDT
References: <935@security.UUCP>
Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Organization: CS Dept, U. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lines: 21

In article <342@ihlpm.UUCP> iod@ihlpm.UUCP (robinson) writes:

>	It was announced today that Penthouse magazine will be doing
>	a 17 page layout of Madonna in an upcomming issue.
>	The pictures are suppose to be very explicit!

I saw the layout.  The photos are not your typical girly-mag photos.
They have artistic pretensions.

>	For all of you out there who think Madonna is a role model
>	I say your fuckin crazy....
>	This whore is a fuckin slut and should be banned from the music seen.

For years and years male rock singers have advocated promiscuous sex.
Reaction:  none.  These are the heroes of a generation of youth.
Madonna does the same thing and what's the reaction:
She's a "whore and a f*ckin slut who should be banned from the music scene".

It appears that the double standard is back.

	Frank Silbermann