Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: THE LAST WORD (HOPEFULLY) ON THE GREAT IOCTL DEBATE! Message-ID: <396@baylor.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 12:59:47 EDT Article-I.D.: baylor.396 Posted: Wed Aug 14 12:59:47 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 03:17:30 EDT References: <630@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria Lines: 18 > Ok, the only thing I am sicker of than changing between SYSV and 4.2 > terminal ioctl()s is listening to this endless debate about them (and > all the confusion.) > > (I just fixed a couple before sending.) I am therefore sending it to > this list to let those that prefer coding to whining to work out the > bugs and add missing features, especially from other variants I don't > have to test this on (eg. Xenix, real V7, SYSIII etc.) Thank you thank you thank you. Now maybe I can get back to coding :->. I'll let you know if it works on our kinky V7. (all sorts of extra flags to handle a weird proprietary network... it's a auperset of V7 ioctl). -- Peter da Silva (the mad Australian) UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076