Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!gatech!amdcad!phil From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.consumers Subject: Re: ATT perceived as threatening? Message-ID: <2434@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Wed, 7-Aug-85 22:28:18 EDT Article-I.D.: amdcad.2434 Posted: Wed Aug 7 22:28:18 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Aug-85 22:49:47 EDT References: <2126@amdcad.UUCP> <70900041@trsvax> Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 19 I compared ATT and MCI and ATT appears to be only 10% more. There is also talk about how ATT wants to cut their long distance prices even more but the FCC is making them slow down. I never hear competitors say their quality is better than ATT. To me, ATT's superior quality is worth the small and decreasing premium. Why would anyone use MCI? (or the others) (I do not now or ever plan to own stock in or otherwise benefit from ATT. I just wonder why people do what they do.) -- Even a cabbage may look at a king. Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA