Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1e.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihu1e!mjv
From: mjv@ihu1e.UUCP (Vlach)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Stand firm on your position.
Message-ID: <517@ihu1e.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Aug-85 10:29:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihu1e.517
Posted: Fri Aug 16 10:29:51 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 08:34:23 EDT
References: <424@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 24

> What about:
> 
>   Any laws related to the slavery issue should be determined solely by the
>   plantation owners.  Even better: No regulation, save that supported by
>   sound economic concern for the profitability of the plantation owners.

What does slavery have to do specifically with plantation owners?  All over
the world, for thousands of years, different people were involved in slavery.
It is not specific to any one race, sex, or country.  There is no direct
interconnection like that of women and abortion.  And there is no problem
outlawing slavery because unlike abortion there is no need for it.
> 
>   Others roles in relation to slavery would be limited to peaceful, personal
>   discussion regarding the actions of plantation owners whom they know.
> 
> Sounds just about as reasonable.  Oh, and by the way, have any of you 'pro-
> choice' people who favor restricting pro-lifer's freedoms of speech & voting
> ever heard of the U.S. Constitution or the First Amendment?
> 
>                                         -- Thomas Newton
I don't know what you mean here -- who has been trying to restrict
anybody's freedom of speech or voting?!?   First I heard about it.  

Marcia Bear