Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!burl!clyde!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!herbie From: herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong - DCS) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: CD player differences Message-ID: <1606@watdcsu.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 09:52:32 EDT Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1606 Posted: Wed Aug 14 09:52:32 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 21-Aug-85 05:45:23 EDT References: <4934@allegra.UUCP> Reply-To: herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong - DCS) Organization: U of Waterloo Lines: 21 Summary: In article <4934@allegra.UUCP> dep@allegra.UUCP (Dewayne Perry) writes: >But, what about things like imaging? >When I compared an NAD with a Mission cd player - at roughly the >same volume - the imaging was quite different. The singer was on >the floor with the NAD and standing up with the Mission. Can that >be a function of a slight difference in loudness? a difference in frequency respsonse could account for the perceived differences in imaging. if the drivers are sufficiently far apart and the spectral content of the music appropriate, the difference in dispersion of the drivers between two speaker designs can cause differences in imaging. Herb Chong... I'm user-friendly -- I don't byte, I nybble.... UUCP: {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra|clyde}!watmath!water!watdcsu!herbie CSNET: herbie%watdcsu@waterloo.csnet ARPA: herbie%watdcsu%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa NETNORTH, BITNET, EARN: herbie@watdcs, herbie@watdcsu