Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dscvax2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucsbcsl!dscvax2!mn From: mn@dscvax2.UUCP (Matt Noah) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Survival of Tarzan proves pro-choicer's arguments Message-ID: <20@dscvax2.UUCP> Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 17:14:06 EDT Article-I.D.: dscvax2.20 Posted: Fri Aug 9 17:14:06 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 03:43:04 EDT Organization: Digital Sound Corp., Santa Barbara Lines: 14 > The fact the the fetus requires the environment of a human being's body > to provide it with support tells me quite clearly that it is not alive. > If you disagree with that notion, fine. That goes against definitions of > life as we know it, but that's OK, the net is full of people who make > up their own definitions at whim. [FLAME OFF] > -- > Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr A new born baby requires the attention and care of human beings for quite some time before it can survive independently - Tarzan excluded, of course. "life as we know it" - It seems you're watching a wee bit too much Star Trek, Mr. Rosen. Matt Noah