Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-spice.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-spice!tdn From: tdn@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA (Thomas Newton) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Stand firm on your position. Message-ID: <424@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA> Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 02:15:12 EDT Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-s.424 Posted: Mon Aug 12 02:15:12 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 01:14:43 EDT Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 15 What about: Any laws related to the slavery issue should be determined solely by the plantation owners. Even better: No regulation, save that supported by sound economic concern for the profitability of the plantation owners. Others roles in relation to slavery would be limited to peaceful, personal discussion regarding the actions of plantation owners whom they know. Sounds just about as reasonable. Oh, and by the way, have any of you 'pro- choice' people who favor restricting pro-lifer's freedoms of speech & voting ever heard of the U.S. Constitution or the First Amendment? -- Thomas Newton Thomas.Newton@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA