Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site im4u.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!riddle
From: riddle@im4u.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: "Non-gay homosexuals"
Message-ID: <437@im4u.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 10:35:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: im4u.437
Posted: Tue Aug 20 10:35:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 23-Aug-85 04:57:14 EDT
References: <1302@hound.UUCP> <1220@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: riddle@im4u.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle)
Organization: U. of Tx. at Houston-in-the-Hills
Lines: 13
Re: Bisexuality anyone?
Dead-Horse-Ophile: "Bob"

>> At the risk of flogging a dead horse, let me suggest yet another reason why
>> we should prefer ''gay'' to ''homosexual''. I have known gay bisexuals,
>> non-gay bisexuals, and (strangest of the lot) non-gay homosexuals. It all
>> has to do with how you identify yourself, not whom you sleep with.

Whoops, I must have missed something.  "Non-gay homosexuals"?  Apparently
you're making a denotative distinction here between "gay" and "homosexual"
(as opposed to all the connotative distinctions that have already been made
in this newsgroup).  Can you clarify?

--- Prentiss Riddle ("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.")
--- {ihnp4,harvard,seismo,gatech}!ut-sally!riddle   riddle@ut-sally.UUCP
--- riddle@ut-sally.ARPA, riddle%zotz@ut-sally, riddle%im4u@ut-sally