Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!cybvax0!fbp From: fbp@cybvax0.UUCP (Rick Peralta) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.unix Subject: Re: ls follies Message-ID: <695@cybvax0.UUCP> Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 11:40:55 EDT Article-I.D.: cybvax0.695 Posted: Wed Aug 21 11:40:55 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 13:47:34 EDT References: <3123@nsc.UUCP> <1803@reed.UUCP> <321@luke.UUCP> Reply-To: fbp@cybvax0.UUCP (Rick Peralta) Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.unix-wizards:14480 net.unix:5430 Summary: In article <321@luke.UUCP> you write: >> What gets me is there is no way to convince ls to produce _unsorted_ >>output! (never mind why... > How about ls -f. By the way why does -f have to turn off -l and about everything else ? Please followup in net.unix. Rick ...!cybvax0[!dmc0]!fbp "A likely story. I don't believe a word of it."