Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!msds
From: msds@drutx.UUCP (SimmonsMW)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Fetus versus Cancer
Message-ID: <105@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 16:56:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.105
Posted: Thu Aug  8 16:56:49 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 05:34:53 EDT
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 18



   I once new a women who had cancer and also a fetus.  After much
thought about the situation, she decided to have the fetus removed
instead of the cancer.  She knew that kids would be a lot more
trouble to take care than the cancer after all cancer will take
care of its self and the kids wouldn't.  
   The only way you could even compare a fetus to cancer or a bad
kidney would be if the fetus  was threating the life of the
mother. Cancer is life threating a bad kidney or other organs
that don't function could be life threating, but a fetus come on
abortion is cold blooded MURDER!! No matter how you try to justify
it, it is wrong. If a fetus is growing it is living and it is not
 destroying cells like cancer so it can not be even considered
in the same category as cancer.