Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site galbp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!akgua!akgub!galbp!wolf
From: wolf@galbp.UUCP (Wolf Herda)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: PMS
Message-ID: <191@galbp.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 18:20:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: galbp.191
Posted: Thu Aug  8 18:20:01 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 21:44:11 EDT
References: <>
Reply-To: wolf@galbp.UUCP (Wolf Herda)
Organization: Lanier Business Products, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia
Lines: 43

In article <> nap@druxo.UUCP (ParsonsNA) writes:
>
>> Ross:
>> Seriously, each of us has seen some women who was not as effective at her
>> job around the time of her period due to these PMS.  If you were in a
>> hiring position, would you want to hire someone who (for a few days each
>> month) *might* not be as effective as a man?
>
>Would you want to hire someone who (at any time during the month) *might*
>not be as effective as a woman?
>
>Seriously, I cannot recall noticing any woman's effectiveness decreasing
>at the time of her period enough to be noticeable, other than one
>occasionally saying she didn't feel good.  If she felt bad enough, she went
>home and made up her time later.  Is this what you mean by "not as
>effective as a man"?
>
>On the other hand, I have seen any number of men who were frequently
>ineffective in their jobs due to their uncontrolled interest in the
>opposite sex.
>
>By the way, is there a reason that you use the plural form "women" to
>refer to the singular "woman"?
>
>> I highly doubt that Time Inc. they would make me their spokesperson.
>
>One reason I respect Time Inc.    :-)
>
>Nancy Parsons
>AT&T ISL

 I never thought any woman was ever as effective as a man, even when she's 
not in her period.  
We need to go back to the days when the women are in the kitchen and not on the 
net!


-- 

Wolf Herda
Lanier Business Products, Inc.
{gatech,akgua,akgub}!galbp!wolf
(404) 329-8254