Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-gr.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!utah-gr!thomas From: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: Net.sources.d and mods to software. Message-ID: <1545@utah-gr.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 13:42:43 EDT Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1545 Posted: Thu Aug 8 13:42:43 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Aug-85 04:26:35 EDT References: <366@timeinc.UUCP> <295@luke.UUCP> <532@stc-b.stc.UUCP> Reply-To: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept Lines: 16 In article <532@stc-b.stc.UUCP> andrew@stc.UUCP (Andrew Macpherson) writes: >I'm afraid there is a rather crass reason for keeping net.sources, at >least on this side of the atlantic. >> M O N E Y <<. You see if I >mail my latest snafu-merge prog off for inclusion in mod.sources I have >to pay ( or at least STC in my case ) for the costs of the >inter-continental mail. Would it be possible to get a mod.sources moderator on the Europe side? I think there are a couple of other groups that have dual moderators, so technically it must be possible. This would reduce the money problem to sending mail to a European site, which must be cheaper. -- =Spencer ({ihnp4,decvax}!utah-cs!thomas, thomas@utah-cs.ARPA) "You don't get to choose how you're going to die. Or when. You can only decide how you're going to live." Joan Baez