Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site iham1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!iham1!rwn
From: rwn@iham1.UUCP (Bob Neumann)
Newsgroups: net.music.synth
Subject: Multitrack decks
Message-ID: <436@iham1.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 12:39:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: iham1.436
Posted: Wed Aug 21 12:39:52 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 14:24:44 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

I do not have experience with the FOSTEX A-80, but I
do own a TEAC TASCAM Model 38 and have worked with
home studio owners with FOSTEX A-8 machines.

I do not regret my investment in the TASCAM machine.
Since the TASCAM machine uses 1/2 inch tape and the FOSTEX
uses 1/4 inch, the sound quality on the TASCAM is superior.
I use and Oberheim DMX drum machine and DSX sequencer and utilize
sync-to-tape codes for overdubs and mixdowns, and have had no problems
with the TASCAM but I have run into some awkward situations 
with the FOSTEX.  

I guess I`m biased towards the TASCAM stuff.  If you compare
specs and listen to work done on both machines, I'm
sure you will be able to justify the added cost of a TASCAM.

			Bob Neumann