Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ames.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ames!barry
From: barry@ames.UUCP (Kenn Barry)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Settling down?
Message-ID: <1082@ames.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 13-Aug-85 21:35:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: ames.1082
Posted: Tue Aug 13 21:35:32 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Aug-85 05:50:23 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA
Lines: 26

[Help! Help! Help!]{{ { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { {(burp)
	Here's an obvious singles-type question that I don't recall seeing
asked here recently: which of the following best describes the kind of future
you would most *like* to have?

	1) You meet the MOTAS of your dreams, and live together (married or
	   otherwise) happily ever after;
	2) Like above, but a series of long-but-not-lifelong relationships of
	   complete partnership;
	3) You have many serious relationships, but live alone.
	4) You have mostly casual relationships;
	5) Some combination of 1-4 above;
	6) Other (and I know there's a lot of other possibilities - declaim at
	   will!)

	I suspect that some variant of "settling down" is still the desire of
most singles, but I also suspect that the minority who don't desire that is
increasing in size, and I'm curious what the net.singles crowd thinks. What's
your preference, and why? Anybody want to vote for an interesting "other"
(bigamy, menage a trois, celibacy, communes)?

-  From the Crow's Nest  -                      Kenn Barry
                                                NASA-Ames Research Center
                                                Moffett Field, CA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 	USENET:		 {ihnp4,vortex,dual,hao,menlo70,hplabs}!ames!barry