Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1h.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass From: parnass@ihu1h.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal Subject: Re: Radar Detector Legislation (JAMMING radar) Message-ID: <663@ihu1h.UUCP> Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 09:03:25 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1h.663 Posted: Wed Aug 21 09:03:25 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 13:27:40 EDT References: <> <214@proper.UUCP> <781@dataio.UUCP> <354@ssc-bee.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 39 Xref: watmath net.auto:7777 net.legal:2140 x Seems like we had this discussion 2 years ago on the net. Using radar jamming equipment to foil traffic radar is in violation of several federal and international regu- lations: - FCC Rules & Regulations: - R&R 89.51 - Station Authorization Required. - R&R 89.117 - Acceptability of Transmitters for Licensing - Communications Act of 1934: - Sec 324 - Use of Minimum Power - International Telecommunications Commission Con- vention 1947: - Article 44 - Harmful Interference - International Radio Regulations Annexed to the International Telecommunications Convention 1947: - Article 13 - Unnecessary transmissions and superfluous signals - Article 22 - Station license - Geneva Treaty 1959: - Article 1 Sec 3 - Harmful interference -- =============================================================================== Bob Parnass, Bell Telephone Laboratories - ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass - (312)979-5414