Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter
From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: THE LAST WORD (HOPEFULLY) ON THE GREAT IOCTL DEBATE!
Message-ID: <396@baylor.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 12:59:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: baylor.396
Posted: Wed Aug 14 12:59:47 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 03:17:30 EDT
References: <630@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria
Lines: 18

> Ok, the only thing I am sicker of than changing between SYSV and 4.2
> terminal ioctl()s is listening to this endless debate about them (and
> all the confusion.)
>
> (I just fixed a couple before sending.) I am therefore sending it to
> this list to let those that prefer coding to whining to work out the
> bugs and add missing features, especially from other variants I don't
> have to test this on (eg. Xenix, real V7, SYSIII etc.)

Thank you thank you thank you. Now maybe I can get back to coding :->.

I'll let you know if it works on our kinky V7. (all sorts of extra
flags to handle a weird proprietary network... it's a auperset of
V7 ioctl).
-- 
	Peter da Silva (the mad Australian)
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076