Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!gatech!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.consumers
Subject: Re: ATT perceived as threatening?
Message-ID: <2434@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Aug-85 22:28:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.2434
Posted: Wed Aug  7 22:28:18 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Aug-85 22:49:47 EDT
References: <2126@amdcad.UUCP> <70900041@trsvax>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 19


I compared ATT and MCI and ATT appears to be only 10% more.
There is also talk about how ATT wants to cut their long distance
prices even more but the FCC is making them slow down.

I never hear competitors say their quality is better than ATT.

To me, ATT's superior quality is worth the small and decreasing premium.
Why would anyone use MCI? (or the others)

(I do not now or ever plan to own stock in or otherwise benefit from ATT.
 I just wonder why people do what they do.)

-- 
 Even a cabbage may look at a king.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA