Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dscvax2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucsbcsl!dscvax2!mn
From: mn@dscvax2.UUCP (Matt Noah)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Survival of Tarzan proves pro-choicer's arguments
Message-ID: <20@dscvax2.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 17:14:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: dscvax2.20
Posted: Fri Aug  9 17:14:06 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Aug-85 03:43:04 EDT
Organization: Digital Sound Corp., Santa Barbara
Lines: 14

> The fact the the fetus requires the environment of a human being's body
> to provide it with support tells me quite clearly that it is not alive.
> If you disagree with that notion, fine.  That goes against definitions of
> life as we know it, but that's OK, the net is full of people who make
> up their own definitions at whim.  [FLAME OFF]
> -- 
>	Rich Rosen	ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr

A new born baby requires the attention and care of human beings for quite
some time before it can survive independently - Tarzan excluded, of course.
"life as we know it" - It seems you're watching a wee bit too much Star
Trek, Mr. Rosen.

Matt Noah