Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site sesame.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!sesame!slerner From: slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: RE: links in DOS Message-ID: <288@sesame.UUCP> Date: Wed, 21-Aug-85 00:02:22 EDT Article-I.D.: sesame.288 Posted: Wed Aug 21 00:02:22 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 19:06:41 EDT References: <8776@microsoft.UUCP> Organization: Lotus Development Corp Lines: 28 >> [The question is whether, under MS-DOS, one can give a file multiple names >> as with the Unix link call.] >> >> Yes, you can, but no, you shouldn't. It is fairly easy to patch a DOS >> directory so that you have more than one name pointing to the same chain >> of disk blocks. It's a bad idea, though, because DOS doesn't expect there to >> be more than one name for a file and if you delete any of the names, all of >> the blocks for the file will be marked free and reused. > An even worse problem than deleting, is that any change to the file size/date stamp will only be updated in ONE directory! Even though the proper FAT chain will be pointed to, if the file length is off you can kiss your data good-bye. If you really miss UN*X so much, dump DOS and rig up an emulator to allow dos programs to run under UN*X. -- Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus Development Corp. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA