Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bunny.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!bunny!epm0 From: epm0@bunny.UUCP (Erik Mintz) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio,net.aviation Subject: Re: SALYUT_7 SWLING Message-ID: <163@bunny.UUCP> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 08:02:15 EDT Article-I.D.: bunny.163 Posted: Thu Aug 15 08:02:15 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 07:28:16 EDT References: <3596@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA Lines: 40 Xref: linus net.ham-radio:2450 net.aviation:1718 > > The follow is the Keplerian Element Set an previously know > frequencies use by SLYUT_7. I have not hear them yet but > what I understand there is a good chance one may hear them > off the coast of New England as they talk to the "Russian > fishing fleet :)" > > freq. most likely on > 121.750 mhz WBFM actively reported freq. > 142.400 mhz WBFM actively reported freq. > 162.000 mhz WBFM TEL data > 192.000 mhz WBFM ( tobad for chan 9 ) > > less likely but possible > 121.500 mhz > 121.625 mhz > 142.417 mhz > 142.600 mhz > 18.000/18.060 mhz am > 15.008 mhz > 20.008 mhz > > ... > ... > Several of these frequencies are in the aircraft band. 121.5 is the civilian aircraft emergency frequency. I thought this was by international convention. I would be very surprised to find anyone transmitting routine messages on it. I certainly have never heard any. In fact, I thought that the whole band between 118 MHz and 135 MHz was alloted to aircraft operations. Can anyone correct me on this? -- Erik Mintz ARPA or CSnet : epm0%gte-labs.csnet@csnet-relay UUCP: ...harvard!bunny!epm0