Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unc.unc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!unc!fsks From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Madonna Message-ID: <122@unc.unc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 22:38:49 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.122 Posted: Fri Aug 9 22:38:49 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 07:22:07 EDT References: <935@security.UUCP> Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Organization: CS Dept, U. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill Lines: 21 In article <342@ihlpm.UUCP> iod@ihlpm.UUCP (robinson) writes: > It was announced today that Penthouse magazine will be doing > a 17 page layout of Madonna in an upcomming issue. > The pictures are suppose to be very explicit! I saw the layout. The photos are not your typical girly-mag photos. They have artistic pretensions. > For all of you out there who think Madonna is a role model > I say your fuckin crazy.... > This whore is a fuckin slut and should be banned from the music seen. For years and years male rock singers have advocated promiscuous sex. Reaction: none. These are the heroes of a generation of youth. Madonna does the same thing and what's the reaction: She's a "whore and a f*ckin slut who should be banned from the music scene". It appears that the double standard is back. Frank Silbermann