Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttrdc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Hugs, etc. Message-ID: <368@ttrdc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 16-Aug-85 22:32:02 EDT Article-I.D.: ttrdc.368 Posted: Fri Aug 16 22:32:02 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 04:56:18 EDT References: <15500012@uiucdcsp> <470@moncol.UUCP> Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL Lines: 31 In article <470@moncol.UUCP>, john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) writes: >] and receive hugs. So, I have a suggestion for >] you, fellow-netters. Instead of sending flames >] to people you disagree with, why not send hugs >] to people you agree with. That should brighten >] everyone's day. >] >] Manoj Jha > >Great idea! Does anyone know of a way to illustrate a hug via e-mail? We >have the ubiquitous smiley face :-) and all it's variations, but I've never >seen a good way to represent a hug. > How about something like: <_0_> (Imagine if you will the embracing arms. This is the best I could think of at the moment which only occupies one line, as the smiley face does. Maybe there is a better "hug" someone else can think of, perhaps one which uses more than one line.) -- ------------------------------- Disclaimer: The views contained herein are | dan levy | yvel nad | my own and are not at all those of my em- | an engihacker @ | ployer, my pets, my plants, my boss, or the | at&t computer systems division | s.a. of any computer upon which I may hack. | skokie, illinois | | "go for it" | Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy -------------------------------- or: ..!ihnp4!iheds!ttbcad!levy