Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors as a Warning Device
Message-ID: <901@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 16:46:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccice5.901
Posted: Fri Aug 23 16:46:25 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 12:10:47 EDT
References: <1014@hou2h.UUCP> <41@cbnap.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 14

> STOP!! Don't even suggest it. Some one in the Fed. Gov. might hear you.
> Besides, they already thought of it. Collision avoidance systems are
> being considered as mandatory equipment for heavy trucks and the like.
> (can't recall reference, but will search on request)
> I'm sure if it passes, cars will be next. If this keeps up, cars will
> cost as much as private planes. (Maybe then general aviation will get
> some sympathy !) 
> 		Regulation Sucks!!!  ihnp4!tcbnap!tel
> 
> Don't protect me from myself, if I'm stupid I deserve to die!

Fine by me.  Just don't let your stupidity take me with you. :-)

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***