Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site vax1.fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!jeepcj2a From: jeepcj2a@fluke.UUCP (Dale Chaudiere) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: time for me to leave Message-ID: <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 10:09:14 EDT Article-I.D.: vax1.1129 Posted: Thu Aug 22 10:09:14 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 17:46:49 EDT References: <1643@akgua.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 24 > > Sorry, but I think that it's time for me to fly and leave this newsgroup. > >Over the last two months I have been reading the group and I find it getting > >quite boring. I personally feel that most of the stuff that gets posted > >these days belongs in net.consumers or net.legal. Well, time for me to hit > >the Big U...bye... > > Adrian Zannin > > I assume Adrian is refering the discussions on DWI, 55 MPH speed limit, > the legality (morality?) of radar detectors etc that have been the > subject of a lot of the postings recently. > Maybe what we need is a new group, net.auto.tech where technical > discussions can be posted. You know - "my 83 Ford/Chevy/whatever does > this etc etc. Help" Then the opinion/philosophy discussions can remain > in net.auto, but those who are only interested in the technical info > won't have to wade through rest of the articles. > > Mike Graham @AT&T Technologies > Atlanta, Georgia > (Norcross really, but who ever heard of Norcross.) > akgua!mlg I agree. I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of the other. I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech. Any others more opinions out there on this?