Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!proper!elric
From: elric@proper.UUCP (elric)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Radar Surveillance
Message-ID: <215@proper.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 16:39:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: proper.215
Posted: Thu Aug 15 16:39:20 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 22:24:41 EDT
References: <1081@homxa.UUCP> <4891@allegra.UUCP> <269@ihlpl.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: elric@proper.UUCP (Elric of Imrryr)
Organization: Lunatic Laboratories Unltd.
Lines: 17
Xref: linus net.auto:6644 net.legal:1716

In article <> gritz@homxa.UUCP (R.SHARPLES) writes:
>My point is not that police should not apprehend speeders, I am all for
>safe highways.  My point is that the use of radar guns to catch speeders
>is basically unwarrented search, from which we have constitutional protection.

>It is bad enough to let the govt. get away with this, but now NJ wants to
>outlaw our only defense against this!  That's like the govt. outlawing 
>devices that detect wire taps.  Does that sound constitutional?!?


 Russ has a good point.
Another this is that the possesion of a radar detect does not harm anyone.
It is a victemless crime. Having a radar detector does not make it impossible
to catch you, it only protects your
privecy. Also radar guns are very unrelyable.

  elric