Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!proper!elric
From: elric@proper.UUCP (elric)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Radar Surveillance
Message-ID: <229@proper.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 06:11:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: proper.229
Posted: Tue Aug 20 06:11:47 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 23-Aug-85 05:47:14 EDT
References: <1081@homxa.UUCP> <4891@allegra.UUCP> <269@ihlpl.UUCP> <1090@homxa.UUCP> <719@homxb.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: elric@proper.UUCP (Elric of Imrryr)
Organization: Lunatic Laboratories Unltd.
Lines: 20
Xref: linus net.auto:6699 net.legal:1761

In article <> levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) writes:
>the radar detector can help them avoid a ticket.  My question to these people
>is: how?  What does one do when hearing it sound off (presuming that the speed
>is already <= the max)?  Brake and go ultra-slow to make it obvious that one is

Well, I don't even own a car, but I feel that:
1) If the gov't can watch me with a radar gun, then I have a right to know.
2) The potential to comit a crime should not be a crime. My owning a radar
detect does not hurt me or the guy behind me.
3) The national 55mph speed limit was forced down the states throats by the federal gov't. (States that don't enforce
the 55mph limit don't get any highway $$$ from uncle. Even those that $$$$ came
from the taxpayers of that state.
So I'm not speed because the 55mph is illegal. It says in the consitution that
the Federal Gov't is not to interfear in the laws of the states.

---
Disclaimer
The above may or may not be the veiws of Lunatic Labs. We don't know.
---
  Elric of Imrryr