Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.auto Subject: Re: Uninsured motorism Message-ID: <653@psivax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 22:10:21 EDT Article-I.D.: psivax.653 Posted: Wed Aug 14 22:10:21 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 01:46:45 EDT References: <202@SCIRTP.UUCP> <378@kontron.UUCP> <586@ttidcc.UUCP> Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) Distribution: net Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA Lines: 19 Xref: linus net.legal:1724 net.auto:6653 In article <748@lsuc.UUCP> msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) writes: > >Which suggests that, in jurisdictions where motorists are allowed >not to have insurance (that's most of them in North America, isn't it?), >insurance companies should sell policies that protect you not only >against your own liability but also against that of the uninsured >driver who runs into you. > As a matter of fact, this is quite standard, even in states where liability insurance is required by law(such as California). I have had Uninsured Driver insurance since I first owned a car! The main problem with it is of course the deductible and the maximum coverage. It also adds a small amount to your premiums. -- Sarima (Stanley Friesen) {trwrb|allegra|cbosgd|hplabs|ihnp4|aero!uscvax!akgua}!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen or {ttdica|quad1|bellcore|scgvaxd}!psivax!friesen