Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nrcvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!chris From: chris@nrcvax.UUCP (Chris Grevstad) Newsgroups: net.mail,net.mail.headers Subject: question about headers Message-ID: <210@nrcvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 01:24:39 EDT Article-I.D.: nrcvax.210 Posted: Wed Aug 14 01:24:39 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 01:41:11 EDT Reply-To: chris@nrcvax.UUCP (Chris Grevstad) Organization: The Zoo Lines: 40 Xref: linus net.mail:1001 net.mail.headers:414 I have a question about mail headers. From what I can glean from RFC821, I find the following message is correct (assuming that there really are such domains and sub-domains, which is of course a small matter in another discussion). My question to Those Who Know is this: is the following message legal and correct according to RFC821? And if so, how must bezerklymail be hacked in order to respond correctly to this? We are running 4.2BSD. /*********************** SAMPLE MESSAGE ***********************/ From chris@nrcvax.S-CA.UUCP Tue Aug 13 12:00:58 1985 Received: by nrcvax.S-CA.UUCP (4.12/4.7) id AA06837; Tue, 13 Aug 85 12:00:54 pdt Date: Tue, 13 Aug 85 12:00:54 pdt From: chris@nrcvax.S-CA.UUCP (Chris Grevstad) Message-Id: <8508131900.AA06837@nrcvax.UUCP> To: chris@nrcvax.S-CA.UUCP Subject: TEST Status: O Body of message. --------- Chris Grevstad {sdcsvax,hplabs}!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!chris ucbvax!calma!nrcvax!chris /********************** END OF SAMPLE MESSAGE ***********************/ All replies gratefully appreciated. -- Chris Grevstad {sdcsvax,hplabs}!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!chris ucbvax!calma!nrcvax!chris ... you see, we are only a computer software programming order of monks...