Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site poseidon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!pegasus!phoenix!poseidon!josie
From: josie@poseidon.UUCP (Jack Gross)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: time for me to leave
Message-ID: <1270@poseidon.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 11:43:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: poseidon.1270
Posted: Fri Aug 23 11:43:22 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 12:55:54 EDT
References: <1643@akgua.UUCP> <1129@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Lincroft NJ
Lines: 34


>I agree.  I read net.auto only for the technical discussions and skip most of
>the other.  I put in my 2 cents worth for net.auto.tech.  Any others more
>opinions out there on this?



	Lets hear it for net.auto.tech. Im sick and tired of having to
skip over all the stupid articles about avoiding the law and other
illegal acts. I don't like the fact that there is a 55 MPH limit, but
thats life. I guess if I owned a rader detector I would also invent
a method to rob banks. As long as I don't get caught why should anyone
mind, the FDIC will cover the losses ? 

	It is a fact that highway fatalities are much lower with a 55 
MPH limit. I resent those who feel that they have superior driving
capabilities and that "they" can control their car at higher speeds 
as well as I can at the limit. 

	Maybe we should all be required to take a speed test. Each 
state could license drivers for different speed ratings, dependent
on each persons reflexes. Then all of those fools that think that  
they are better than the rest of us can go and kill themselfs 
like a bunch of race car drivers.

	I will still read the net, but only because I like the topic of
automobile's. In reality radar DWI and all other illegal activities
should be on their own net. How about net.murder or net.crook ?




			Jack Gross