Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site moncol.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!moncol!john From: john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Hugs, etc. Message-ID: <474@moncol.UUCP> Date: Sun, 18-Aug-85 22:33:13 EDT Article-I.D.: moncol.474 Posted: Sun Aug 18 22:33:13 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:24:15 EDT References: <15500012@uiucdcsp> <470@moncol.UUCP> <368@ttrdc.UUCP> Organization: Monmouth College, West Long Branch, NJ 07764 Lines: 39 ]From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) ]Message-ID: <368@ttrdc.UUCP> ]Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL ] ]In article <470@moncol.UUCP>, john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) writes: ] ]>Great idea! Does anyone know of a way to illustrate a hug via e-mail? We ]>have the ubiquitous smiley face :-) and all it's variations, but I've never ]>seen a good way to represent a hug. ] ]How about something like: ] ]<_0_> ] ](Imagine if you will the embracing arms. This is the best I could think of ]at the moment which only occupies one line, as the smiley face does. Maybe ]there is a better "hug" someone else can think of, perhaps one which uses ]more than one line.) I'm not sure. Waht does everyone else think? It sorta reminds me of a Tie Fighter. :-) I have to admit, though, it ain't too bad. Well, <_0_> 's to all. -- Name: John Ruschmeyer US Mail: Monmouth College, W. Long Branch, NJ 07764 Phone: (201) 222-6600 x366 UUCP: ...!vax135!petsd!moncol!john ...!princeton!moncol!john ...!pesnta!moncol!john Disclaimer: Monmouth College is a mecca for diverse opinions. It is, therefore, highly unlikely that the above opinions are those of anyone but me. Silly quote: Son, you're mixing ponderables again...