Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Re: Re: more on file \"attributes\" Message-ID: <442@baylor.UUCP> Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 10:48:19 EDT Article-I.D.: baylor.442 Posted: Sat Aug 17 10:48:19 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:31:09 EDT References: <1311@eagle.UUCP> <2030@ukma.UUCP> <147@daab.UUCP> <1013@genrad.UUCP> Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 20 > >>>What? That famous university-developed system doesn't support any IPC? No > >>>locks? No semaphores? No shared memory? No messages? Gee.... No! > >> > >>What? That big corporation-developed system doesn't have TCP/IP? No > >>sockets? No symbolic links? No cp -r? No C-shell? Geee.... No! > >> > > > >Why don't you look for UniPlus+ port of SysV, there you have everything you > >need and then you don't want to run anything else on your machine!. > > Not really. It doesn't support symbolic links. Or select() using any Good to see I'm not the only person willing to flame on this. At least I got the message that SV-ists are just as refractory as creationists. I still want job control and symbolic links, you all hear? -- Peter da Silva (the mad Australian werewolf) UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076