Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!sdcrdcf!faigin
From: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel Faigin)
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Has anyone ever found North Dakota
Message-ID: <2248@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 20:55:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2248
Posted: Wed Aug 14 20:55:18 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 08:25:31 EDT
References: <650@utai.UUCP>
Reply-To: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel Faigin)
Followup-To: net.bizarre
Distribution: net
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 32
Keywords: wyoming
Summary: 
Summary: Followup-To: net.bizare,net.bizarre,net.bizzarre

In article <650@utai.UUCP> perelgut@utai.UUCP (Stephen Perelgut) writes:
> Has anyone ever found North Dakota?

Actually, it is Wyoming that does not exist. (I think N. Dakota
is just in the State of Confusion... or was that Idiocy).
According to something I heard, Wyoming is there just to fill out
the map. It has a nice shape; it looks good. But, it is all
wasteland. No one is from there (or will admit to being from
there).

Wyoming just doesn't exist.

Daniel.

P.S.: Maybe, just the entire northern central western part of the
US doesn't exist. You know, states like Idaho, N. Dakota,
Wyoming, Minnesota. Then, there are places that we wish didn't
exist. Like Detroit.

P.P.S.: Should this discussion be in net.bizarre?

DPF
-- 
UUCP: {akgua allegra ihnp4 hplabs sdcsvax trwrb cbosgd}!sdcrdcf!faigin  
ARPA: sdcrdcf!faigin@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA --or-- sdcrdcf!faigin@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU

W: SDC, 2500 Colorado MD 52-46; Santa Monica CA 90406; (213) 820-4111 x6493
H: 11743 Darlington Avenue #9; Los Angeles CA 90049; (213) 826-3357

The views and opinions expressed in  this message are not necessarily those of
my  employer,  except  the janitor who agrees with everything I write.  I hope
for his early recovery and release.