Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!stevenh From: stevenh@tekig4.UUCP (Steve Herring) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: More Newsgroup Changes Message-ID: <227@tekig4.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 13:06:06 EDT Article-I.D.: tekig4.227 Posted: Fri Aug 23 13:06:06 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 13:43:33 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 26 > > Suggestion 2: move "net.astro" to "net.sci.astro" > Suggestion 3: move "net.physics" to "net.sci.physics" > Suggestion 4: move "net.space" to "net.sci.space" > Suggestion 6: drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4) I think these four groups are doing just fine the way they are. These groups have enough traffic that they should be their own groups and not be subgroups. Please do not drop net.columbia. It has enough traffic to warrant it's own group. I also don't think that the readers of net.space (those that don't subscribe to net.columbia) would like to have this merger. I also think that net.columbia is one of those groups that a lot of people read but not a lot of people post to. Net.columbia is an ideal group right now. It contains detailed, informative info on the space shuttles without a lot of "garbage" and "bs" like net.space has. Net.columbia has one of the most mature followings on the net. I wish all groups were like this. Don't mess with a group that works. > Suggestion 7: move "net.abortion" to "net.flame.abortion" > Suggestion 8: move "net.origins" to "net.flame.origins" These are jokes right? Steve Herring ...!tektronix!tekig4!stevenh