Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site waltz Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!waltz!haddock From: haddock@waltz Newsgroups: net.micro.ti Subject: Re: TIPC memory price quote Message-ID: <31900011@waltz> Date: Sun, 18-Aug-85 18:24:00 EDT Article-I.D.: waltz.31900011 Posted: Sun Aug 18 18:24:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 03:34:54 EDT References: <824966696@smu> Lines: 38 Nf-ID: #R:smu:824966696:waltz:31900011:000:1392 Nf-From: waltz!haddock Aug 18 17:24:00 1985 /* Written 2:02 pm Aug 13, 1985 by gypsy!emery in waltz:net.micro.ti */ >One reason IBM PC boards are much cheaper is quantity. Let's face >it, there are a few more IBM's around than TI. ^a few^far^ >One final note, TI issued a ROM upgrade. If you have an older TI, >you may need this upgrade to address more than 256k. As I recall, Not quite. Having fully populated Persyst boards in all of my older TIPC systems the absence of the "new" ROMs prevents it from addressing the top 16-bytes of 512K memory. B{F}D! It hasn't caused me any problems and I tend to push my TIPCs quite bit. >TI soaks you somewhere between $40-$60 for the new ROM chips. That's life. I s'pose that MOST anyone else would be doing the same thing. >TI, ARE YOU LISTENING?!?!?!? Well, some of us are but not anyone that has to do with TIPC's. Those folks are in Austin and aren't on any external network. ================================================================ _____ -Rusty- |\/ o \ o | ( -< O o Where's the fish? |/\__V__/ ARPA: Haddock%TI-CSL.csnet@CSNet-Relay.arpa or Rusty@Maryland CSNet: Haddock@TI-CSL USENET: {ut-sally, convex!smu, texsun, rice} ! waltz ! haddock DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed above are mine and not those of Texas Instruments Incorporated.