Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Cryptic C Message-ID: <905@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 17:59:24 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.905 Posted: Thu Aug 22 17:59:24 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 10:02:31 EDT References: <2913@ncsu.UUCP>, <709@brl-tgr.ARPA> <5884@utzoo.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 5 > It's interesting to note that Kernighan&Plauger use "yes" and "no" rather > than "true" and "false", ... Yes, but the conventional use in symbolic logic is true/false. One is not always asking a natural yes/no question of a predicate.