Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site aero.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!aero!foy From: foy@aero.ARPA (Richard Foy) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Torek's SECOND ANNUAL CONCLUSIVE ARGUMENT :-> Message-ID: <392@aero.ARPA> Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 17:03:49 EDT Article-I.D.: aero.392 Posted: Thu Aug 22 17:03:49 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 13:48:37 EDT References: <789@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1012@noscvax.UUCP> Reply-To: foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy) Organization: The Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA Lines: 9 Summary: In article <390@oliven.UUCP> barb@oliven.UUCP (Barbara Jernigan) writes: > >But do we really 'own' our own bodies? If we do, why are there laws >against suicide -- as well as against a multitude of other self-harming >possibilities -- protecting us from ourselves, as it were? Chew on the >ramifications of THAT for a while. > Could it be that many people like to control other people? richard foy