Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!trudel
From: trudel@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Jon)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: _Back_to_the_Future_  (spoiler)
Message-ID: <3336@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19-Aug-85 00:04:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3336
Posted: Mon Aug 19 00:04:01 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:21:40 EDT
References: <2706@ut-sally.UUCP>
Organization: Sirius Cybernetics Complaints Planet #2
Lines: 51




>                          _Back_to_the_Future_
> 
>                           by Kelvin Thompson
 
> _Back_to_the_Future_ is a bad, confused movie.  If there are any doubts
> that Hollywood is still rife with drug abuse, this movie can lay them to
> rest.
 
> The movie seems to concern a middle-class high school student, Charles J.
> Fox (_Sixteen_Candles_, _The_Breakfast_Club_, _Weird_Science_)...
> ... the scientist's DeLorean sports car...

Well, that's it.  I'm not going to read any more of these stupid reviews.
Why, you ask?  Well, this one is the most pointless of all.  I think that
whoever is running this AI program must also have had a few bits
permanently grounded.  

First of all, let me be one of the first of thousands to point out
that it is Micheal J. Fox.  Sure, it was an attempt at humor to
confuse two young actors, but it falls flat, ok?  Also, the AI
database is showing with lack of data surrounding DeLoreans (it
probably only has : DeLorean-see Drugs, Cocaine).  It must have locked
in on this factor and blamed any minor discrepancies of the film with the
Hollywood drug environment.  Great.  Tell us something we don't
already know.
 
> The only conclusion the viewer can draw is that _Future_ is the most
> drugged-out movie since _Caddyshack_.  

Well, this shows more gaps in the database-What about all those Cheech
and Chong movies?  Perhaps it is the only other movie entered into the
database that also had a reference to cocaine.  
 
If there is a Kelvin, why doesn't he step forward?  I'll tell you.
There isn't.  Kelvin is the result of a lot of programmers down in
Texas.   I always wanted to know why Kelvin never rebutted the critics
of his/her/its reviews, and now I'm positive I know.  

Fool me once, shame on you.  
Fool me twice, shame on me.

No more.
-- 

					   Jonathan D. Trudel
					arpa:trudel@ru-blue.arpa
	 			uucp:{seismo,allegra,ihnp4}!topaz!trudel
		   	    "You can't fight in here, this is the WAR ROOM!"