Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site timeinc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!timeinc!greenber
From: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: PMS
Message-ID: <417@timeinc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 09:14:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: timeinc.417
Posted: Sat Aug 17 09:14:12 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 05:33:59 EDT
References: <3688@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Organization: Time, Inc. - New York
Lines: 38
Summary: 

In article <3688@decwrl.UUCP> chabot@miles.DEC  writes:
>
>
>Ross, you must meet a lot of males who experience PMS, no?  I must, if I 
>follow those rules.
>
>No, it's not reasonable to assume that because of a temporary change
>in personality that a woman may be suffering from PMS.  It's actually pretty
>rude behavior to make such arbitrary assumptions.
>

Lisa, later on I can tell you in a private posting about the differences
between the sexes.  It might fascinate you, will probably scare you, and 
if you pay someone enough, they'll help you with the big words.

I've never met a man who experiences PMS, just like I've
never met a women who gets an erection.  Oh, there might be
similiar aspects of each that someone who doesn't enjoy finding bad
in themself will certainly deny.  I won't deny that men and women
share the same hassles in life.  But *some* women may also suffer
from PMS.

But, to you at least, there ain't no such thing as PMS.  Perhaps you
have a problem recognizing it in others because you always seem to
be in a state of irritability.  But just denying that PMS exists
doesn't make any sense to me.

But that holds with most of your postings.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross M. Greenberg  @ Time Inc, New York 
              --------->{vax135 | ihnp4}!timeinc!greenber<---------

I highly doubt that Time Inc.  would make me their spokesperson.
---