Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site vaxwaller.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!vlsvax1!zehntel!varian!vaxwaller!susan From: susan@vaxwaller.UUCP (Susan Finkelman) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Morality down the throat Message-ID: <311@vaxwaller.UUCP> Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 11:49:46 EDT Article-I.D.: vaxwalle.311 Posted: Mon Aug 12 11:49:46 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 22:26:28 EDT References: <17@dscvax2.UUCP> Organization: Varian, Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 23 > > In CA, poor women can get free abortions from state money whereas birth > control is not free. Economically, some women see it as making sense > to abort rather than shield. Judge for yourself but they do use abortion > as a birth control method. > Planned Parenthood used to give contraceptives to women without the means to pay. I strongly suspect they still do. > Some do, some don't. It must be their choice? It is a last resort? > People should not be choosing when other people die. The power is too > great. Abortion as a last resort is so inaccurate. I wish it were true > but it is not. By the way, what do you see as alternatives? Apparently > you don't believe in adoption. Lately, I've had resume-like literature > from couples who are seemingly desparate for an adoption. They are willing > to pay and sometimes very well! > > Matt Noah So now we're talking having babies for money. Or is it selling humans? Isn't that slavery? Susan Finkelman