Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site mako.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!orca!mako!jans
From: jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Mirror Recomendations? (re-posting)
Message-ID: <895@mako.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Aug-85 14:38:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: mako.895
Posted: Wed Aug  7 14:38:05 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Aug-85 02:21:33 EDT
Reply-To: jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman)
Distribution: na
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 12
Xref: tektronix net.rec.photo:01504 

C'mon, folks!  Someone out there must be using a mirror lens they like!  I
got one reply to my previous posting.  (Thank you, noscvax!dberg.)  I have
a conventional 400/5.6 and find it's size keeps it at home.  Can anyone
tell their experiences with mid-sized mirrors!  Any that shine?  Is the
lack of a diaphragm (depth-of-field control) particularly bothersome?  Is
the "hot-spot", or corner light fall-off problem that plagued early mirrors
still a problem?  How about size, weight and handling of your favorite?

Email replies will be summarized and re-posted.  Don't be bashful.
-- 
:::::: Jan Steinman		Box 1000, MS 61-161	(w)503/685-2843 ::::::
:::::: tektronix!tekecs!jans	Wilsonville, OR 97070	(h)503/657-7703 ::::::