Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cbnap.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!cbnap!tel
From: tel@cbnap.UUCP (T. E. Lester x3259 3E257)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Radar Detectors as a Warning Device
Message-ID: <41@cbnap.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Aug-85 12:20:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbnap.41
Posted: Mon Aug 19 12:20:49 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 22:31:12 EDT
References: <1014@hou2h.UUCP>
Reply-To: tel@cbnap.UUCP (T. E. Lester x3259 3E257)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus
Lines: 22
Keywords: Detect and Move Left...
Summary: Stop More Gov. Regulation

In article <1014@hou2h.UUCP> stadlin@hou2h.UUCP (Art Stadlin) writes:
>> ....and people are stopped up ahead. Forewarned is fore-armed.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tom Frye
>
>What a great idea!  All cars could be required to have
>radar that turns on automatically when the 4-way flashers ....
>-- 
>  \\\
>   \\\\                                  Art Stadlin
STOP!! Don't even suggest it. Some one in the Fed. Gov. might hear you.
Besides, they already thought of it. Collision avoidance systems are
being considered as mandatory equipment for heavy trucks and the like.
(can't recall reference, but will search on request)
I'm sure if it passes, cars will be next. If this keeps up, cars will
cost as much as private planes. (Maybe then general aviation will get
some sympathy !) 
		Regulation Sucks!!!  ihnp4!tcbnap!tel

Don't protect me from myself, if I'm stupid I deserve to die!
>    \\\\\\________!{akgua,ihnp4,houxm}!hou2h!stadlin