Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttrdc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Hugs, etc. Message-ID: <376@ttrdc.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:01:54 EDT Article-I.D.: ttrdc.376 Posted: Tue Aug 20 21:01:54 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 13:59:23 EDT References: <15500012@uiucdcsp> <470@moncol.UUCP> <368@ttrdc.UUCP> <474@moncol.UUCP> Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL Lines: 42 In article <474@moncol.UUCP>, john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) writes: >] >]In article <470@moncol.UUCP>, john@moncol.UUCP (John Ruschmeyer) writes: >] >]>Great idea! Does anyone know of a way to illustrate a hug via e-mail? We >]>have the ubiquitous smiley face :-) and all it's variations, but I've never >]>seen a good way to represent a hug. >] >]How about something like: >] >]<_0_> >] >](Imagine if you will the embracing arms. This is the best I could think of >]at the moment which only occupies one line, as the smiley face does. Maybe >]there is a better "hug" someone else can think of, perhaps one which uses >]more than one line.) > >I'm not sure. Waht does everyone else think? It sorta reminds me of a Tie >Fighter. :-) > >I have to admit, though, it ain't too bad. > >Well, <_0_> 's to all. > > >-- >Name: John Ruschmeyer HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!! What's a Tie Fighter? Come to think of it, it DOES look like an overhead view of a boxer! Maybe "(_0_)" ? Maybe / \ "<_0_>" (whoo, that's even WORSE!)? -- ------------------------------- Disclaimer: The views contained herein are | dan levy | yvel nad | my own and are not at all those of my em- | an engihacker @ | ployer, my pets, my plants, my boss, or the | at&t computer systems division | s.a. of any computer upon which I may hack. | skokie, illinois | | "go for it" | Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy -------------------------------- or: ..!ihnp4!iheds!ttbcad!levy