Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!allison From: allison@mitre.ARPA Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Reply:"quoting past messages" Message-ID: <3332@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Sun, 18-Aug-85 19:09:27 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.3332 Posted: Sun Aug 18 19:09:27 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:05:40 EDT Sender: daemon@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 19 From: allison@mitre.ARPA I disagree quite strongly. Sometimes I haven't. What? Does that mean my comments aren't valid? What annoys me even *more* is people who either can't figure out the difference between "your" and "you're," or don't care. See what I mean? John "Why didn't he quote the previous message?" DeCarlo P.S. I have a better solution to the "quoting past messages" problem. Let's just impose a new rule: If your message is going to be the first message in a digest, then go ahead and quote the previous message. But (and this is the important part) if your message is *not* going to be the first in the digest, then *don't* quote the previous message. C'mon people. Let's be a little more considerate, shall we? Good.