Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-spice.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-spice!tdn
From: tdn@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA (Thomas Newton)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Stand firm on your position.
Message-ID: <424@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 02:15:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-s.424
Posted: Mon Aug 12 02:15:12 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 01:14:43 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 15

What about:

  Any laws related to the slavery issue should be determined solely by the
  plantation owners.  Even better: No regulation, save that supported by
  sound economic concern for the profitability of the plantation owners.

  Others roles in relation to slavery would be limited to peaceful, personal
  discussion regarding the actions of plantation owners whom they know.

Sounds just about as reasonable.  Oh, and by the way, have any of you 'pro-
choice' people who favor restricting pro-lifer's freedoms of speech & voting
ever heard of the U.S. Constitution or the First Amendment?

                                        -- Thomas Newton
                                           Thomas.Newton@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA