Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!Pavel.pa
From: Pavel.pa@Xerox.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: "From Elfland to Poughkeepsie"
Message-ID: <3346@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19-Aug-85 15:32:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.3346
Posted: Mon Aug 19 15:32:17 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 22:31:57 EDT
Sender: daemon@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 44

From: Pavel.pa@Xerox.ARPA

Charley Wingate writes:
	 I happen to own _Language of the Night_ by LeGuin, ...
	 First, we have "From Elfland to Poughkeepsie", in which
	 she takes apart (as it happens) K. Kurtz (who seems to have
	 learned from the article).

I had the good fortune to talk to Katherine Kurtz about this very
article at Westercon in Sacramento last month.  I was interested in
whether or not she had been affected by the article and, in particular,
whether it was responsible for what I perceived as a long gap between
books (i.e., had the article soured Katherine on writing in any way).

She made some interesting comments on the subject.  First, she assured
me that she had in no way been discouraged by the article; the gaps
between her books all stem from the fact that she's just a relatively
slow writer.  Another comment was that while she wouldn't go so far as
to claim that LeGuin had been wrong to write the piece as she did,
Katherine would never have published something so bald about another's
work without at least sending a copy to the subject.  Katherine claims
she never even heard about the piece until she stumbled across it much
later (I think when reading ``Language of the Night'').  I think I agree
with her on this point.

As a final point, she agreed with me (unsurprisingly, I suppose) that
LeGuin's claims in the article were just plain wrong.  (The article
takes a couple of paragraphs out of ``Deryni Rising'' and, by changing
the proper names into modern ones, transforms the writing into a
20th-century political novel.  LeGuin makes that statement that in true
fantasy writing she shouldn't be able to do that.)  Katherine is not
trying to write ``high fantasy'' in the tradition of Lord Dunsany and
Tolkien.  She is writing what she calls ``historical fantasy''; she is
trying for a greater sense of realism and identifiability in her
characters.  Their style of speaking is always appropriate to the
situation: ``forsoothly speech'' is not for every-moment use.  I believe
that LeGuin takes far too narrow a view in her criticism of Ms. Kurtz.

To sum up the reason I wrote this in response to the excerpt above, not
only do I not think Katherine has ``learned from the article'' anything
about writing, but I believe that the article really had nothing to
teach her in the first place.

	Pavel Curtis