Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cadre.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!geb
From: geb@cadre.ARPA (Gordon E. Banks)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.med
Subject: Re: Tooth Decay...
Message-ID: <498@cadre.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 12:37:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: cadre.498
Posted: Thu Aug 22 12:37:52 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 19:42:47 EDT
References: <430@timeinc.UUCP>
Reply-To: geb@cadre.ARPA (Gordon E. Banks)
Distribution: net
Organization: Decision Systems Lab., University of Pittsburgh
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.legal:2155 net.med:2170


Well, you probably should ask your lawyer, but, although
$160 for an exam sounds outrageous, unless the dentist spent
more than 90 minutes on it (himself), unless there was some
understanding that follow-up visits are free, you are probably
liable.  There are a few (very few) surgeons who give free
follow-up care, but 99.9% of them it is a new charge every time
you come.  They aren't obligated to tell you in advance the fee for each
visit unless you specifically ask.  Most people don't ask.
I would suggest a trip to New Jersey or Connecticutt for future
dental work.