Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site drune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!drune!mohler
From: mohler@drune.UUCP (MohlerDS)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: David Mohler is completely correct
Message-ID: <25@drune.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Aug-85 22:58:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: drune.25
Posted: Thu Aug 22 22:58:10 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Aug-85 04:04:45 EDT
References: <19@drune.UUCP> <4162@alice.UUCP>, <10068@ucbvax.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 10

Steve, 
	One last point, since the 24th order transverse filter is a digital
implemented filter and the output is what allows you to do noise shaping,
the performance is better than an analog filter could do using a 14 bit
ADC. Which as you and I have pointed out can be cheaper or more linear than
a 16 bit ADC. 

			David S. Mohler
			AT&T - ISL @ Denver
			drune!mohler or druxu!mohler