Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site tommif.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!greipa!tommif!cat
From: cat@tommif.UUCP (Catherine Mikkelsen)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Madonna in Playboy
Message-ID: <128@tommif.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 02:33:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: tommif.128
Posted: Fri Aug  2 02:33:37 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Aug-85 05:00:40 EDT
References: <1105@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Lines: 27
Summary: girls of mensa ?????????????????????????????????

In article <1105@vax1.fluke.UUCP>, tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee) writes:
> Well, I bought the "Madonna Issue" of Playboy yesterday - I just wanted
> to see what a boy toy might look like, and besides |-), "The Girls of Mensa"
> were suppossed to be in there too (they weren't).
> 
> Of course the magazine, in general, sucks.  Their equalitarian viewpoint seems
> to stress the ideal that if your wife has a good job your life will be easier
> (more money, etc.).  I admit I liked the part where they predicted the Seattle
> Seahawks to win the Superbowl, but one premature prediction does not a 
> magazine make.
> 
> Later,
> PeterB

Hey Peter:  I hear that they let women into Mensa, too.

(And some of them can even spell, let alone make, er, premature predictions.)

Yes, I know I'm nit-picking (oooooooooooh, MIGHT be PMS!!!), but one more
thing: since when do egalitarian viewpoints stress ideals that entail IF
statements????

Oh well, the supercilious last paragraph WAS kinda cute.

Signed,

A MENSA girl who knows.