Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-gr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!utah-gr!thomas
From: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Net.sources.d and mods to software.
Message-ID: <1545@utah-gr.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Aug-85 13:42:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1545
Posted: Thu Aug  8 13:42:43 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Aug-85 04:26:35 EDT
References: <366@timeinc.UUCP> <295@luke.UUCP> <532@stc-b.stc.UUCP>
Reply-To: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas)
Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 16

In article <532@stc-b.stc.UUCP> andrew@stc.UUCP (Andrew Macpherson) writes:
>I'm afraid there is a rather crass reason for keeping net.sources, at
>least on this side of the atlantic.  >> M O N E Y <<.  You see if I
>mail my latest snafu-merge prog off for inclusion in mod.sources I have
>to pay ( or at least STC in my case ) for the costs of the
>inter-continental mail.

Would it be possible to get a mod.sources moderator on the Europe side?
I think there are a couple of other groups that have dual moderators, so
technically it must be possible.  This would reduce the money problem to
sending mail to a European site, which must be cheaper.

-- 
=Spencer   ({ihnp4,decvax}!utah-cs!thomas, thomas@utah-cs.ARPA)
	"You don't get to choose how you're going to die.  Or when.
	 You can only decide how you're going to live." Joan Baez