Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.RUTGERS.EDU Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!eric From: eric@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Eric Lavitsky) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac,net.micro Subject: Re: Amiga vs Mac Message-ID: <3241@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Mon, 12-Aug-85 07:45:40 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.3241 Posted: Mon Aug 12 07:45:40 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 01:32:28 EDT References: <8883@ritcv.UUCP> <26700024@inmet.UUCP> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 20 Xref: linus net.micro.mac:2339 net.micro:10211 In article <26700024@inmet.UUCP>, bhyde@inmet.UUCP writes: > > I for one am very happy not to have any discussion of the > Amiga in this news group... "The Amiga? That's the machine > that one ups the MacIntosh right, more memory, more sound, more > color, even has less software than the Mac did when it was introduced." > ben hyde, cambridge Eh?, you'd better get your facts straight. The Amiga will have 20+ packages available upon release - I've seen many of them. How many did the Mac have? 2...3? All I can remember are MacPaint and MacWrite - care to refresh my memory as to the other 20? Eric -- ARPA: LAVITSKY@RUTGERS UUCP: ...{harvard,seismo,ut-sally,sri-iu,ihnp4}!topaz!eric SNAIL: 16 Oak St., Flr 2 New Brunswick, NJ 08903