Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekchips.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!tekchips!wm From: wm@tekchips.UUCP (Wm Leler) Newsgroups: net.astro Subject: Re: astrological fanaticism (both sides) Message-ID: <64@tekchips.UUCP> Date: Tue, 6-Aug-85 18:09:37 EDT Article-I.D.: tekchips.64 Posted: Tue Aug 6 18:09:37 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Aug-85 00:33:05 EDT References: <1967GMS@psuvm> <1844@amdahl.UUCP> <2522@sun.uucp> <433@spar.UUCP> Reply-To: wm@tekchips.UUCP (Wm Leler) Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 30 >> ... but it _is_ net.astro. I suggest that astrology has little place here. Ahem. (giggle) Oh come on. Post your software. I vote to ignore both those people who claim that astrology is a science (we just don't have scientific intruments to measure it with yet), AND those people that won't look at astrological software because they think it's a parlor game. If someone says ``RUN THERE IS A TIGER'', I will run, but there had better have been a tiger. Otherwise next time I might not believe them. I can measure tigers. Likewise, if someone develops an expert system and uses it to play rogue, I will still accept it as an expert system, even though personally I think rogue is a complete waste of time. Let's get back to talking about the sky and the stars. After all, it _is_ net.astro. Wm Leler (p.s. no flames about rogue, please!) (p.p.s. Another tip of the hat to the fine folks at StarDate. Keep up the good work.)