Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site tommif.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!greipa!tommif!cat From: cat@tommif.UUCP (Catherine Mikkelsen) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Madonna in Playboy Message-ID: <128@tommif.UUCP> Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 02:33:37 EDT Article-I.D.: tommif.128 Posted: Fri Aug 2 02:33:37 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Aug-85 05:00:40 EDT References: <1105@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Lines: 27 Summary: girls of mensa ????????????????????????????????? In article <1105@vax1.fluke.UUCP>, tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee) writes: > Well, I bought the "Madonna Issue" of Playboy yesterday - I just wanted > to see what a boy toy might look like, and besides |-), "The Girls of Mensa" > were suppossed to be in there too (they weren't). > > Of course the magazine, in general, sucks. Their equalitarian viewpoint seems > to stress the ideal that if your wife has a good job your life will be easier > (more money, etc.). I admit I liked the part where they predicted the Seattle > Seahawks to win the Superbowl, but one premature prediction does not a > magazine make. > > Later, > PeterB Hey Peter: I hear that they let women into Mensa, too. (And some of them can even spell, let alone make, er, premature predictions.) Yes, I know I'm nit-picking (oooooooooooh, MIGHT be PMS!!!), but one more thing: since when do egalitarian viewpoints stress ideals that entail IF statements???? Oh well, the supercilious last paragraph WAS kinda cute. Signed, A MENSA girl who knows.