Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Version 1.0 Netnews CMS/BITNET 5/19/85; site PSUVM.BITNET Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!gmp From: GMP@psuvm.BITNET Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Re: The Perils of Nutrasweet (actually, sugar) Message-ID: <2086GMP@psuvm> Date: Thu, 15-Aug-85 10:53:37 EDT Article-I.D.: psuvm.2086GMP Posted: Thu Aug 15 10:53:37 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Aug-85 08:42:44 EDT References: <771@burl.UUCP> <394@petrus.UUCP> <192@omen.UUCP> <780@inuxd.UUCP> <2991@nsc.UUCP> <273@bbnccv.UUCP> <198@omen.UUCP> <22 Lines: 10 A comment from the diabetics. There are some of us who simply can t eat sugar. The issue is not obesity, it is death. I am intrigued with the argument, and appalled by the insensitivity. Not only is there the contempt of vanity but there is the intolerance of the divergent. Computing is no haven for the humanist. Most of you are bigoted on behalf of your science that you have no sense of life. I guess I should have put this on net.flame, but your rules are so idiosyncratically rigid that frankly there's no real point to trying to figu re them out. Reply if you can explain who on earth writes some of these tediou s moralities. gmp@psuvm