Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!briand
From: briand@tekig4.UUCP (Brian Diehm)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: _Back_to_the_Future_  (spoiler)
Message-ID: <220@tekig4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Aug-85 13:22:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekig4.220
Posted: Tue Aug 20 13:22:44 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Aug-85 03:30:23 EDT
References: <2706@ut-sally.UUCP> <3336@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 31

> >                          _Back_to_the_Future_
> > 
> >                           by Kelvin Thompson
>  
> > _Back_to_the_Future_ is a bad, confused movie.  If there are any doubts
> > that Hollywood is still rife with drug abuse, this movie can lay them to
> > rest.
> 
> Well, that's it.  I'm not going to read any more of these stupid reviews.
> Why, you ask?

		Unnh, no, I didn't need to ask. -ed.

> If there is a Kelvin, why doesn't he step forward?

*** REPLACE THIS MESS WITH KELVIN'S LINEAGE ***

Of course.  Kelvin is a cute version of Kelvinator, the warped appliance of
a robot producing this stuff.  Actually, if you look upon Kelvin's "reviews"
as a form of humor. . .

		{ Just Sagans and Sagans of line feeds }

. . . they're still pretty sophomoric.

Actually, I'm really glad "Kelvin" CAN'T step forward - mobility in such a
juvenile AI entity would indeed be a frightening thing!

-Brian Diehm
Tektronix, Inc. (I'm NOT an officer of the company, so the company is NOT bound
                 by anything I say or sign. . .)