Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ames.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ames!barry From: barry@ames.UUCP (Kenn Barry) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Settling down? Message-ID: <1082@ames.UUCP> Date: Tue, 13-Aug-85 21:35:32 EDT Article-I.D.: ames.1082 Posted: Tue Aug 13 21:35:32 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 17-Aug-85 05:50:23 EDT Distribution: net Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 26 [Help! Help! Help!]{{ { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { {(burp) Here's an obvious singles-type question that I don't recall seeing asked here recently: which of the following best describes the kind of future you would most *like* to have? 1) You meet the MOTAS of your dreams, and live together (married or otherwise) happily ever after; 2) Like above, but a series of long-but-not-lifelong relationships of complete partnership; 3) You have many serious relationships, but live alone. 4) You have mostly casual relationships; 5) Some combination of 1-4 above; 6) Other (and I know there's a lot of other possibilities - declaim at will!) I suspect that some variant of "settling down" is still the desire of most singles, but I also suspect that the minority who don't desire that is increasing in size, and I'm curious what the net.singles crowd thinks. What's your preference, and why? Anybody want to vote for an interesting "other" (bigamy, menage a trois, celibacy, communes)? - From the Crow's Nest - Kenn Barry NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ USENET: {ihnp4,vortex,dual,hao,menlo70,hplabs}!ames!barry