Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!qantel!ihnp4!ihlpl!par From: par@ihlpl.UUCP (Rupsis) Newsgroups: net.religion.christian Subject: Re: About Literalism: The authors of Scripture. Message-ID: <275@ihlpl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 13:41:38 EDT Article-I.D.: ihlpl.275 Posted: Fri Aug 9 13:41:38 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 13-Aug-85 01:49:09 EDT References: <2194@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1050@umcp-cs.UUCP> <2222@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <498@utastro.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 22 > There is a third theory that is convincing to me: Scripture was written > by men, and like all things written by men, it contains errors. There, > now, that wasn't so bad, was it? > > Bill Jefferys I guess the writer of Hebrews didn't quite agree with that theory. When quoting Psalm 95 the writer says: "Therefore, just as the Holy Spirit says, 'TODAY IF YOU HEAR HIS VOICE,...'" (Hebrews 3:7 NASB) The writer of Hebrews actually thought that the Holy Spirit was the author of Psalm 95. What a fool! Everyone knows that Scripture was written by men. (and men alone?) Paul Rupsis "But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them" (1 Corintians 2:14)