Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter
From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: Re: more on file \"attributes\"
Message-ID: <442@baylor.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Aug-85 10:48:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: baylor.442
Posted: Sat Aug 17 10:48:19 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Aug-85 21:31:09 EDT
References: <1311@eagle.UUCP> <2030@ukma.UUCP> <147@daab.UUCP> <1013@genrad.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 20

> >>>What?  That famous university-developed system doesn't support any IPC?  No
> >>>locks?  No semaphores?  No shared memory?  No messages?  Gee....  No!
> >>
> >>What?  That big corporation-developed system doesn't have TCP/IP?  No
> >>sockets?  No symbolic links?  No cp -r?  No C-shell?  Geee....  No!
> >>
> >
> >Why don't you look for UniPlus+ port of SysV, there you have everything you
> >need and then you don't want to run anything else on your machine!.
> 
> Not really.  It doesn't support symbolic links.  Or select() using any

Good to see I'm not the only person willing to flame on this. At least I got
the message that SV-ists are just as refractory as creationists.

I still want job control and symbolic links, you all hear?
-- 
	Peter da Silva (the mad Australian werewolf)
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076