Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfclo!jad
From: jad@hpfclo.UUCP (jad)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <44400019@hpfclo.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Jul-85 20:24:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfclo.44400019
Posted: Fri Jul  5 20:24:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 03:24:21 EDT
References: <129@uw-june.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:uw-june:129:hpfclo:44400019:37777777600:938
Nf-From: hpfclo!jad    Jul  5 14:24:00 1985

> 
> This kind of stuff may be OK for net.flame, but please keep it out of
> net.women.  Unfortunately, someone started posting articles to both groups.
> If you're going to get really disgusting (as above), please take net.women
> out of the newsgroups line.
>
	That shit wound up in net.women, too?  I was appalled when I
	read it (I'm only in net.flame cause I heard it had fallen below
	acceptable levels of disgusting), and thought "glad I no longer
	waste my time here".  Now I hear it's in net.women?  Sheesh.

	I can understand why sites are ceasing to pass net.flame.  And
	will not really be bothered if this just gets thrown away along
	with the rest of the rude notes string.  Perhaps Scott was just
	joking, but I was under the impression that those kind of jokes
	got left in the High School halls.  Take two steps back, Scott;
	perhaps they'll think you're "cool" back there in Jr. Hi...

				    Not amused
				--	jad	 --