Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bbnccv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!bbnccv!sdyer
From: sdyer@bbnccv.UUCP (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 27)
Message-ID: <19@bbnccv.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Jun-85 02:28:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: bbnccv.19
Posted: Mon Jun 24 02:28:51 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Jun-85 03:46:22 EDT
References: <376@iham1.UUCP> <277@phri.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 11

Such a collection of nonsense I haven't seen in a while.  Where are the
apologists such as DuBois now, in the face of such drivel?  What has he
(and any other "creation scientists") to say when they are so embarassed
by their colleagues?  More meta-discussions perhaps?

And finally, what does Kukuk actually DO at Bell Labs?  I think I'm going
to tell my broker to sell...
-- 
/Steve Dyer
{decvax,linus,ima,ihnp4}!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbnccv.ARPA