Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site mcvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!jaap
From: jaap@mcvax.UUCP (Jaap Akkerhuis)
Newsgroups: net.text
Subject: Re: extending (di)troff
Message-ID: <732@mcvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 08:54:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: mcvax.732
Posted: Wed Jul  3 08:54:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 05:58:21 EDT
References: <877@gloria.UUCP>
Reply-To: jaap@mcvax.UUCP (Jaap Akkerhuis)
Distribution: net
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 15

In article <877@gloria.UUCP> colonel@gloria.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman) writes:
 > Two-character names must go!  But we don't want to break anything.  How
 > about this:
 > 
 > 	x		one-character name
 > 	\(xy		two-character name
 > 	\( xyzabc)	n-character name
 > 

**** NEWS FLASH *** NEWS FLASH **** NEWS FLASH ****

According to the latest rumour the next release of ([td]i)troff, scheduled
for release in September (but don't hold your breath), will allow the use
multi character names for characters as follows:
	\C'An_arbitrary_long_character_name'