Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site azure.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!azure!chrisa From: chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen) Newsgroups: net.singles,net.social Subject: Re: Intelligence (and breasts) Message-ID: <329@azure.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 04:53:48 EDT Article-I.D.: azure.329 Posted: Mon Jul 8 04:53:48 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 05:34:36 EDT References: <323@azure.UUCP> <8733@ucbvax.ARPA> Reply-To: chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen) Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 18 Xref: watmath net.singles:7711 net.social:806 Summary: >In article <323@azure.UUCP> chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen) writes: > >>Frankly, I think that any overabundent physical attribute is *too* >>much. Small breast are just as sexy (if not sexier) then large >>breasts. But I'm not a breast man. To me the sexiest physical >>attribute is either eyes, or legs. By the way, someone wrote me a letter asking me not to start up the "big breast vs. little breast" discussion again. Well, since I've only started to use the net in the last two months, I wasn't here when this was last done, but I get the impression that it filled more space then was nescessary. Anyways, I don't want to be the start of a long and lasting discussion that falls down to a nasty level (such as a previous discussion on bathroom behaviour did). If you feel you have something real to contribute to the net as a whole regarding this topic, then respond in this newsgroup, otherwise respond to me directly through E-Mail. Thanks. Chris Andersen