Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site persci.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!tikal!cholula!persci!bill
From: bill@persci.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: RE: Stolen Modem (need rn modification)
Message-ID: <205@persci.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 1-Jul-85 12:05:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: persci.205
Posted: Mon Jul  1 12:05:54 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Jul-85 00:39:20 EDT
References: <2939@drutx.UUCP> <1294@elecvax.OZ> <904@sdcsla.UUCP> <259@runx.OZ> <203@persci.UUCP> <1491@utah-gr.UUCP>
Reply-To: bill@persci.UUCP (Bill Swan)
Organization: Personal Scientific, Woodinville WA
Lines: 16
Summary: 

>>One slight (related) problem is that the latest version of 'rn' doesn't
>>prompt for distribution. In fact, it behaves as if such a thing didn't
>>exist, outside of a line in the header. 
>Gee, the latest version of 'rn' that I am using, which I took straight
>as it came off the net, prompts for a distribution in the 'Pnews'
>command.  This is what one would normally use for posting a new message
>(as opposed to a followup).  Maybe whoever installed 'rn' on your system
>disabled this question?
>=Spencer   ({ihnp4,decvax}!utah-cs!thomas, thomas@utah-cs.ARPA)
OK. Pnews does prompt. I was thinking of replies to messages that had no
distribution set, or are they getting removed? I've seen a *lot* of articles
that didn't have any specific distributions specified. Perhaps 'rn' could
ask, in this case..?

-- 
Bill Swan 	{ihnp4,decvax,allegra,...}!uw-beaver!tikal!persci!bill