Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!hao!noao!terak!doug
From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Ultralight advice sought
Message-ID: <635@terak.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 12:20:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: terak.635
Posted: Mon Jul  8 12:20:55 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Jul-85 07:17:20 EDT
References: <188@SCIRTP> <1700005@infoswx>
Organization: Terak Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Lines: 10

> Ultralights should not be required to have the avionics requirements
> of other aircraft.  For example, the atitude indicator is not needed 
> at all.

The attitude indicator is not required on VFR aircraft.  If it is, I'm
in deep dookie with the FAA 'cuz I don't even have a DG or a Rate-of-
Climb in my 120 :-)
-- 
Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{ihnp4,seismo,decvax}!noao!terak!doug
               ^^^^^--- soon to be CalComp