Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!amdahl!rtech!jeff
From: jeff@rtech.UUCP (Jeff Lichtman)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Infix
Message-ID: <499@rtech.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 05:08:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: rtech.499
Posted: Thu Jun 20 05:08:55 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 28-Jun-85 01:25:21 EDT
References: <2727@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA
Lines: 21

> Take two words that you wouldn't think to use the infix with:
> 
> 				ALABAMA
> 
> 				TATTAMAGOUCHIE
> 
> Now add the expletive infix to each one.  If you compare your result with your
> friends, you'll probably find that you insert the 'f' word in the same place.
> 
> I end up with "Ala-f*ckin'-bama" and "Tattama-f*ckin'-gouchie"...  I'm not sure
> why we do it this way 
> 
> 					Dave Diamond

Does the infix always come before the most strongly stressed syllable?
-- 
Jeff Lichtman at rtech (Relational Technology, Inc.)
aka Swazoo Koolak

{amdahl, sun}!rtech!jeff
{ucbvax, decvax}!mtxinu!rtech!jeff