Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!jordan
From: jordan@ucbvax.ARPA (Jordan Hayes)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame
Subject: (not about) the consumption of toilet paper
Message-ID: <8730@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 11:06:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8730
Posted: Wed Jul  3 11:06:50 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 05:03:05 EDT
References: <241@luke.UUCP> <27705@lanl.ARPA> <191@ihlpl.UUCP>
Reply-To: jordan@ucbvax.UUCP (Jordan Hayes)
Followup-To: net.flame
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 21
Keywords: "think" "about" "it"
Xref: watmath net.women:6222 net.flame:10959
Summary: a lesson in "correctly" edited articles...

Charlie Sorsby (crs@lanl.UUCP) writes:

>> Hey, folks...  How about editing the subject line.  This seems to have
>> gone pretty far afield from its original inane topic.

Jeanette Zobject (zubbie@ihlpl.UUCP) replies:

> How's that.

And then she goes on to put 23 lines of signature. Hmmm. Well, here are
a few hints from a curious flamer.

	a) Check the Newsgroups line
	b) Check the Followup-To line (note that I have)
	c) Check the Subject line (note, again, that I have)
	d) Check the References line (do we NEED more than a line full?)
	e) Check the Keywords line (does it belong in the summary line?)

And now for my signature...

/jordan