Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dicomed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!mhuxn!ihnp4!mgnetp!dicomed!dmh From: dmh@dicomed.UUCP (Dave Hollander) Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: home defense (& killing deer) Message-ID: <520@dicomed.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 09:48:35 EDT Article-I.D.: dicomed.520 Posted: Thu Jun 27 09:48:35 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Jun-85 04:23:23 EDT References: <1195@utcsri.UUCP> Reply-To: dmh@dicomed.UUCP (Dave Hollander) Organization: DICOMED Corp., Minneapolis Lines: 21 Summary: In article <1195@utcsri.UUCP> brown@utcsri.UUCP (Edward Brown) writes: >> ..you might have trouble sleeping! Only if you're too ..... > > Woa there! There is a definite moral difference between killing >wildlife and supporting the butchering of domestic animals that were raised >for that purpose. (Not that I exclusively object to or condone either). >Sorry to get off topic, but that's net.misc for you. > > Ed Brown > ..utcsri!brown > "Being a computer means never having to say you're sorry" Your state wildlife service (what ever their name) does maintain the deer population above the *natural* environment's carring capacity because of the assumption that hunters will reduce the population. I call this 'raised for that purpose'. The only problem is Darwin gets all messed up! dave hollander