Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oddjob.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!oddjob!sandip
From: sandip@oddjob.UUCP (Sandip Chakra)
Newsgroups: net.sci
Subject: Re: darwinism
Message-ID: <835@oddjob.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 12:55:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: oddjob.835
Posted: Thu Jul  4 12:55:36 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:22:46 EDT
References: <526@psivax.UUCP> <1486@bbncca.ARPA>
Organization: U. Chicago, Astronomy & Astrophysics
Lines: 9

> Good points, Sarima.  These persons were given the tomography because
> they were KNOWN to have suffered accidents either prenatally, at birth,
> or in early years, that very likely caused brain damage.

	This does not exclude the fact that they were able to do
above average level work with a few percent of their brain cells.
Suppose all of us were born with 95% of our brain cells damaged, then
since we would be working at an above average level anyway, how do we
know that we needed the other 95% of our brain cells ?