Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site greipa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!pesnta!greipa!jordan From: jordan@greipa.UUCP (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: AF_INET question, thanks. Message-ID: <259@greipa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Jun-85 19:45:13 EDT Article-I.D.: greipa.259 Posted: Wed Jun 19 19:45:13 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Jun-85 03:32:04 EDT Reply-To: jordan@greipa.UUCP (Jordan K. Hubbard) Organization: Genstar Rental Electronics, Palo Alto, Ca. Lines: 19 My thanks to those who mailed me their answers about my INET socket problem (esp Matt Crawford). I got caught by precedence ( = and < in the accept statement) and didn't realize that addresses less that 1024 were only bindable by the super-abuser.. Now, for one (last?) question.. When I want my server to die, I have it shutdown the accepting socket and close it, but for some reason it still stays 'bound' for about 4 minutes afterward.. (I.E. If I restart the server, it fails with 'Address already in use'). This seems strange. Especially the way it 'fixes' itself in time.. Does it 'time out'? (when no one's using it??). Any ideas? -- Jordan K. Hubbard @ Genstar Rental Electronics. Palo Alto, CA. {pesnta, decwrl, dual, pyramid}!greipa!jordan "ack pfffft. gag. retch. barf.. ack" - Bill again.