Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1m.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihu1m!gadfly From: gadfly@ihu1m.UUCP (Gadfly) Newsgroups: net.nlang Subject: Re: d*mn, sh*t, f*ck, un*x: Patterns You May Not Have Considered Message-ID: <515@ihu1m.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 09:52:54 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1m.515 Posted: Tue Jul 16 09:52:54 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 18-Jul-85 04:58:54 EDT References: <3118@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 18 -- > > Maybe we could just use f?ck, d?mn, un?x, that solved the > > ambiguity. Sh?t still presents a problem though ...... > So does "f?ck"--how about "feck" (what you don't have when you're > "feckless"). > > :-) > L S Chabot Yeah, how about it? I could sure use a good feck. -- *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 16 Jul 85 [28 Messidor An CXCIII] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-7753 ** ** ** ** ..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken *** ***