Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-kirk!williams From: williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Will, Destiny, and Chance Message-ID: <3121@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 17:39:03 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.3121 Posted: Mon Jul 15 17:39:03 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:05:46 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 9 Rhetorically, yes, I guess you could say that, but it's like time, you can categorize it into past, present, and future, but it says little of what it actually is. Although Destiny is used to represent the future, I consider it more a term that is influenced by the past. Can you see the analogy? Correct me if I'm mistaken, but the arguments appeared to be an attempt to transcend time to look at a continuous relationship. I believe I will add it to my collection. John.