Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!ccrdave From: ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: Footnote to Samet's PS (SUE!!) Message-ID: <330@ucdavis.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 22:15:01 EDT Article-I.D.: ucdavis.330 Posted: Thu Jul 4 22:15:01 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 7-Jul-85 05:39:04 EDT References: <277@ucdavis.UUCP> <329@mhuxi.UUCP> <611@sfmag.UUCP> <669@digi-g.UUCP> Organization: University of California, Davis Lines: 18 > The use of the word "Jew" tends to obscure what might > properly be called "Christ-killer". I think we should avoid accepting > false connotations of any kind. [LEROY] I think I am going to be sick! If anyone wants to call anyone on this net a Christ-killer, I want to see the fingerprints and the evidence. Otherwise, I think a lawsuit for defamation of character is in order. [Personally, I think the whole thing was a frameup by some second century Romans, and even the New Testament says that children are born Holy, i.e. without sin or responsibility for the actions of others. (Luke 2:23) The whole "original sin" trip isn't in the New Testament.] Whether you call "Sodomites" by "Gay" or not, they ARE guilty of doing their thing. Many will even proudly confess their acts. We just spent weeks going over what the Torah says about Homosexuals. Do we have to now go through what Paul said?