Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/13/84; site intelca.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!nsc!pesnta!amd!intelca!glen From: glen@intelca.UUCP (Glen Shires) Newsgroups: net.games Subject: Re: Infocom games Message-ID: <15@intelca.UUCP> Date: Wed, 10-Jul-85 17:30:37 EDT Article-I.D.: intelca.15 Posted: Wed Jul 10 17:30:37 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jul-85 15:46:08 EDT References: <4786@stolaf.UUCP> <1601@orca.UUCP> Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca. Lines: 26 > > Since Infocom games are so relatively useless after you finish them, and > > since there's quite a few of us who play them here, what about trading them? > > It would be a way of beating the price for those of us who aren't rich > > but are opposed to piracy. Would it contravene anything in the warranty? > > I have Sorcerer and Enchanter. I've played several of the others. I'd > > be interrested in especially in Suspect and Cutthroats. > > The Infocom games are licensed for a single CPU only. > > > -=- Andrew Klossner (decvax!tektronix!orca!andrew) [UUCP] > (orca!andrew.tektronix@csnet-relay) [ARPA] So trade CPU chips too! :-) (Many are actually cheaper than the games themselves) ^ ^ Glen Shires, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca. O O Usenet: {ucbvax!amd,pur-ee,hplabs}!intelca!glen > ARPA: "amd!intelca!glen"@BERKELEY \-/ --- stay mellow -- ^ ^ Glen Shires, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca. O O Usenet: {ucbvax!amd,pur-ee,hplabs}!intelca!glen > ARPA: "amd!intelca!glen"@BERKELEY \-/ --- stay mellow