Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-ngp.UTEXAS Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!sunil From: sunil@ut-ngp.UTEXAS (Sunil Trivedi) Newsgroups: net.news Subject: Re: Random Junk (Really subject lines) Message-ID: <2000@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> Date: Tue, 9-Jul-85 13:24:48 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.2000 Posted: Tue Jul 9 13:24:48 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 08:26:19 EDT References: <1495@utah-gr.UUCP> <487@oliveb.UUCP> <114@desint.UUCP> Organization: The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Lines: 18 From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) Message-ID: <114@desint.UUCP> > In article <487@oliveb.UUCP> jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre) writes: > >Maybe we need a new header ala: > > Subject: caramel sauce > > Originally: hot pepper oil > An excellent idea! Rn and such readers could then follow the discussion > thread properly. How about "Original-Subject:", though? I edit the Subject line and add a Keywords line. Does rn scan that line? While we're into new names, how about "Ref-Subject:" instead? Sunil Trivedi sunil@ut-ngp.ARPA ...!ut-sally!ut-ngp!sunil "Beam me up fast Scotty - there's no toilet paper down here!"