Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttidcc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!ttidca!ttidcc!hollombe From: hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) Newsgroups: net.social,net.women,net.singles Subject: Re: Mensa people Message-ID: <515@ttidcc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 1-Jul-85 14:49:51 EDT Article-I.D.: ttidcc.515 Posted: Mon Jul 1 14:49:51 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 04:42:30 EDT References: <11309@brl-tgr.ARPA> <497@ttidcc.UUCP> <525@psivax.UUCP> Reply-To: hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) Distribution: net Organization: The Cat Factory Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.social:783 net.women:6235 net.singles:7636 In article <525@psivax.UUCP> al@psivax.UUCP (Al Schwartz) writes: >>I think I'll get that Playboy and check the names of the "Mensa Girls" >>against the Mensa Register. I wonder what the home-office lawyers are >>going to think of this. >> >Why? Can people be ousted from Mensa by appearing in the nude? Heavens, no! In fact, I coordinate the local nudist SIG in Los Angeles. "Mensa", on the other hand, is a registered trademark. Its use by Playboy has legal implications. Of course, the Home Office is usually happy to accept any free publcity. I was just wondering why the general membership hadn't heard about this from them. No call went out for model candidates that I know of. So where and how did Playboy find them?