Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!water!watcgl!srneely
From: srneely@watcgl.UUCP (Shawn Neely)
Newsgroups: net.graphics
Subject: Re: 3d fractal generator & shader [posted to net.sources]
Message-ID: <2153@watcgl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Jul-85 10:06:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: watcgl.2153
Posted: Fri Jul  5 10:06:36 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:35:42 EDT
References: <231@harvard.ARPA>
Reply-To: srneely@watcgl.UUCP (Shawn Neely)
Distribution: net
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 4
Summary: 


Is it standard terminology to label the dimensionality of a fractal
by the next higher integer? I guess "Here is a 3-D fractal" is sometimes
more appropriate than "Here is a 2.9375-D fractal".