Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (N. Ersha) Newsgroups: net.women,net.social Subject: Re: "pleasant" work vs. "dangerous" work Message-ID: <547@hou2g.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 09:22:36 EDT Article-I.D.: hou2g.547 Posted: Fri Jul 12 09:22:36 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jul-85 11:36:35 EDT References: <688@lll-crg.ARPA> Organization: rest, relative to the universe Lines: 12 Xref: watmath net.women:6360 net.social:817 > I note a major contradiction here. 1) Divorced fathers were not given > custody. This implies that divorced *mothers* were. We now have a single > (divorced) woman with children to take care of, which conflicts with 2) a > single woman would not have kids to support. Explain, please? ALIMONY! SJB