Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.13 $; site iuvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!jec From: jec@iuvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.atari Subject: Re: ANTIC Online CES Wrapup report Message-ID: <500010@iuvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 14:44:00 EDT Article-I.D.: iuvax.500010 Posted: Tue Jul 2 14:44:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 09:20:31 EDT References: <219@bocar.UUCP> Lines: 12 Nf-ID: #R:bocar:-21900:iuvax:500010:000:503 Nf-From: iuvax!jec Jul 2 13:44:00 1985 The ST520 has the advantage of more memory if you don't use GEM, the 260 doesn't give you that choice. The ST520's GEM should also be easier to fix in the event of errors (which are to be expected). Besides, I don't think you should ignore the ST520 ROM upgrade possibility. I suspect that someone, if not Atari, will make use of it. James E. Conley Usenet: {ihnp4,pur-ee,purdue}!iuvax!jec I.U. Dept. of Linguistics Phone: (812) 335-6458 401 Lindley Hall (812) 332-3514 Bloomington, IN. 47405