Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!dual!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: A new voice. Message-ID: <595@cybvax0.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Jul-85 14:50:15 EDT Article-I.D.: cybvax0.595 Posted: Fri Jul 5 14:50:15 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 05:30:52 EDT References: <2156@ut-sally.UUCP> <347@scgvaxd.UUCP> <300@azure.UUCP> <350@scgvaxd.UUCP> Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA Lines: 32 In article <350@scgvaxd.UUCP> dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovitch) writes: > This is just not so! The central hypothesis has been attacked over and > over. When it is, however, netters change their tune and claim that > evidence against evolution is NOT evidence for creation. > > Mutation has been shown to be a poor mechanism for Evolution. Transmutation > has never been observed and most all mutations have proven harmful. The > variations within species are predicted by the creation model. Even > Evolutionists have admitted the problems involved with Evolution occuring > by chance mutation. Natural selection has serious problems as well. > It has been stated that N.S. predicts everything, therefore it predicts > nothing. > > Evolution really has more problems than you are willing to believe. I've seen convincing refutations of almost every attack you and others have presented on the net, with hardly any rebuttal on the part of creationists or apology by creationists for grossly fraudulent attacks. Almost every citation used by creationists is quoted out of context or has been rebutted in the scientific literature: if you don't believe me, choose a citation from Science, Nature, or any non-creationist science publication that is used in one of Kulak's upty-zillion reasons not to believe in evolution. Read it, or look it up in the scientific citations index (a wonderful tool that lists papers citing works by each individual author. Then look up those responses, and read them.) I've followed up several examples, and the duplicity of creationists shocks me. Evolution is far more convincing than your theology can tolerate. -- Mike Huybensz ...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh