Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1m.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihu1m!gadfly
From: gadfly@ihu1m.UUCP (Gadfly)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: d*mn, sh*t, f*ck, un*x: Patterns You May Not Have Considered
Message-ID: <515@ihu1m.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 09:52:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihu1m.515
Posted: Tue Jul 16 09:52:54 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Jul-85 04:58:54 EDT
References: <3118@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 18

--
> > Maybe we could just use f?ck, d?mn, un?x, that solved the
> > ambiguity.  Sh?t still presents a problem though ......
 
> So does "f?ck"--how about "feck" (what you don't have when you're
> "feckless").
> 
> :-)
> L S Chabot 

Yeah, how about it?  I could sure use a good feck.
-- 
                    *** ***
JE MAINTIENDRAI   ***** *****
                 ****** ******  16 Jul 85 [28 Messidor An CXCIII]
ken perlow       *****   *****
(312)979-7753     ** ** ** **
..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken   *** ***