Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site phri.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!lonetto
From: lonetto@phri.UUCP (Michael Lonetto)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: ETHER
Message-ID: <311@phri.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 14:46:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: phri.311
Posted: Thu Jul  4 14:46:03 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:48:50 EDT
References: <339@sri-arpa.ARPA>
Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY)
Lines: 21

> 
> How about if we say that a mass causes a curvature in the ETHER instead
> of a curvature in space?  Then how bout we say that it isn't a curvature
> its a change in density.  The closer to a mass the higher the density
> the farther away the lower the density.  How about we say that this 
> change in density can maybe cause light to be bent because the ETHER 
> is of higher density than when not near the mass.  How about we say
> that it is really this ETHER 'pressure' that holds us to the planet?
> 
> But anyway, where am I messing up?  I find this an easier way to look
> at things than to think of space curving.                             
> 
> 							Eric 
It's fine except that the ETHER doesn't have mass, it's made of gravity.
Now if you could measure the density of gravitrons....
-- 
____________________

Michael Lonetto  PHRI  NYC  (allegra!phri!lonetto)

Do you think it's REAL?