Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Objectivism
Message-ID: <1310028@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 04:07:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1310028
Posted: Wed Jul  3 04:07:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 06:17:37 EDT
References: <625@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 7

>/* mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) / 12:12 pm  Jul  2, 1985 */

>Secondly, it fails to treat a third possibility: that there is in fact a
>code, but that the code is (for one reason or another) at least partly
>obscured.

What point is there in speculating about a code that is "obscured?"