Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-miles!chabot
From: chabot@miles.DEC (Sxyzyskzyik)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: d*mn, sh*t, f*ck, un*x: Patterns You May Not Have Considered
Message-ID: <3118@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 16:54:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.3118
Posted: Mon Jul 15 16:54:33 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:03:41 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 8

Keith Drescher (kad@ttrdc)
> Maybe we could just use f?ck, d?mn, un?x, that solved the
> ambiguity.  Sh?t still presents a problem though ......

So does "f?ck"--how about "feck" (what you don't have when you're "feckless").

:-)
L S Chabot   ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot   chabot%amber.dec@decwrl.arpa