Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site masscomp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!masscomp!carter From: carter@masscomp.UUCP (Jeff Carter) Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame Subject: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Women/men and the consumption of toilet paper Message-ID: <734@masscomp.UUCP> Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 00:59:49 EDT Article-I.D.: masscomp.734 Posted: Wed Jul 3 00:59:49 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 09:29:43 EDT References: <464@ttidcc.UUCP> <465@gitpyr.UUCP> <2345@topaz.ARPA> <490@gitpyr.UUCP> <2467@topaz.ARPA> Reply-To: carter@masscomp.UUCP (Jeff Carter) Organization: Masscomp - Westford, MA Lines: 7 Keywords: AAGGGGHHHH!!!! Xref: watmath net.women:6213 net.flame:10951 I enjoy reading many of the philosophical debates in net.women (net.flame is another matter), but if I see this subject line again, I think I'm gonna throw up. For the last month or so, the *real* discussion has been 'Women and rape' or 'Men and rape' or 'Equality of the sexes' or 'Equal worth'. Do any of these belong under 'toilet paper'? If they do, then I apologize. But if you're trying to make a point, I hope it deserves a better opening line.