Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oberon.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!uscvax!oberon!tli From: tli@oberon.UUCP (Tony Li) Newsgroups: net.bicycle Subject: Re: Theft Resistance of U-shaped bicycle locks (QUERY) Message-ID: <61@oberon.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 02:26:59 EDT Article-I.D.: oberon.61 Posted: Thu Jun 27 02:26:59 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:30:02 EDT References: <1468@bbncca.ARPA> Reply-To: tli@oberon.UUCP (Tony Li) Organization: U. of So. Calif., Los Angeles Lines: 15 In article <1468@bbncca.ARPA> slipson@bbncca.ARPA (Samuel R. Lipson) writes: I'd like to hear from people who have had bicycles stolen due to the failure of their "high-security" (Citadel/ Kryptonite type) lock, and not the "immovable object" your bike was locked to. I've heard tales that a Kryptonite can be broken using liquid nitrogen, which is much more believable than dry ice. No proof for this, though. My last lock wasn't a Kryptonite, and I regret it. -- Tony Li ;-) Usc Computer Science Uucp: {sdcrdcf,randvax}!uscvax!tli Csnet: tli@usc-cse.csnet Arpa: tli@usc-ecl