Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: notesfiles Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfclo!jad From: jad@hpfclo.UUCP (jad) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <44400019@hpfclo.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Jul-85 20:24:00 EDT Article-I.D.: hpfclo.44400019 Posted: Fri Jul 5 20:24:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 03:24:21 EDT References: <129@uw-june.UUCP> Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO Lines: 20 Nf-ID: #R:uw-june:129:hpfclo:44400019:37777777600:938 Nf-From: hpfclo!jad Jul 5 14:24:00 1985 > > This kind of stuff may be OK for net.flame, but please keep it out of > net.women. Unfortunately, someone started posting articles to both groups. > If you're going to get really disgusting (as above), please take net.women > out of the newsgroups line. > That shit wound up in net.women, too? I was appalled when I read it (I'm only in net.flame cause I heard it had fallen below acceptable levels of disgusting), and thought "glad I no longer waste my time here". Now I hear it's in net.women? Sheesh. I can understand why sites are ceasing to pass net.flame. And will not really be bothered if this just gets thrown away along with the rest of the rude notes string. Perhaps Scott was just joking, but I was under the impression that those kind of jokes got left in the High School halls. Take two steps back, Scott; perhaps they'll think you're "cool" back there in Jr. Hi... Not amused -- jad --