Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ucla-cime.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cime!kyle From: kyle@ucla-cime.UUCP (Kyle D. Henriksen) Newsgroups: net.news,net.flame Subject: Re: To: persons offended by ucla-cs!alex Message-ID: <134@ucla-cime.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 03:18:32 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cim.134 Posted: Thu Jun 27 03:18:32 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 03:06:13 EDT References: <1666@amdahl.UUCP> <131@ucla-cime.UUCP> <2896@nsc.UUCP> Reply-To: kyle@ucla-cime.UUCP (Kyle D. Henriksen) Organization: Crump Institute, UCLA Lines: 30 Xref: watmath net.news:3527 net.flame:10886 Summary: >From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) > Well, I'll start by pointing out the obvious and say that part of being the > System Administrators job at a site is taking complaints off of the net > when one of the users steps beyond the bounds of proper use of the network. Gee and I didn't even see it in the job description... > Anyone has the right to make a formal complaint, if they so wish, > especially when discussing the incident directly with the transgressor > doesn't help. (This is especially true when the screwup is because the > person thinks that the network is a right and not a priviledge, and thinks > they can do anything they want). If the SA doesn't want a lot of screaming > fascists filling their mailbox, they should make sure that the people on > their site aren't acting like mongoloid idiots with a lobotomy. Not that > I'm accusing anyone at UCLA of acting that way, of course.... (I'm just > implying it heavily...) Well since I don't agree with a statement you made, do I now have the RIGHT to incite people to write unsolicited letters to you and your superiors? I of course would not stoop so low. What really is disturbing you about the recent postings? The net serves a large community of users and I'm sorry that some of us just don't really care what is posted, we only read what we think is relavant. The techniques you are using are the traditional preludes to censorship, what do you want the SOVIET CHUQNET? By the way your last comment there could be considered libelous and damaging to a person's career... Have a happy day.