Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.5 $; site uiucdcs Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!seefromline From: dahlback@uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: my increasingly lengthy reviews Message-ID: <10700103@uiucdcs> Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 16:34:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.10700103 Posted: Mon Jul 15 16:34:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 08:06:21 EDT References: <6281@ucla-cs.ARPA> Lines: 7 Nf-ID: #R:ucla-cs.ARPA:-628100:uiucdcs:10700103:000:361 Nf-From: uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA!dahlback Jul 15 15:34:00 1985 I find some of the reviews rather long. It really depends, however, whether I'm interested in the movie to begin with. Perhaps reviewers should use the newspaper style (pyramid structure) more, with description-general opinion- recommendation first (in 1 short paraphraph) and short paragraphs about the other stuff after, where the reader can skip over them.