Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics,net.social Subject: Re: Discrimination against women and statistics Message-ID: <1862@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 16:52:59 EDT Article-I.D.: amdcad.1862 Posted: Sat Jun 29 16:52:59 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 02:32:22 EDT References: <482@ttidcc.UUCP> <8203@ucbvax.ARPA> <8204@ucbvax.ARPA> <581@mtung.UUCP> <405@h-sc1.UUCP> Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.women:6166 net.politics:9650 net.social:756 In article <405@h-sc1.UUCP> desjardins@h-sc1.UUCP (marie desjardins) writes: >Mobility matters because your husband (working, >naturally, in a high-paying job) may have to relocate and you need >to follow him. So why shouldn't the man follow his wife? Well, >because he has a higher-paying job, naturally. Does this mean you're willing to marry a man who makes less money than you? That you're willing to "marry below your class"? I would suspect many women are not. I'd be happy to hear if I'm wrong. -- Phil Ngai +1 408 749 5720 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA