Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site drivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!pesnta!hplabs!amdahl!drivax!braun From: braun@drivax.UUCP (Karl Braun) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: register variables Message-ID: <166@drivax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Jun-85 15:26:09 EDT Article-I.D.: drivax.166 Posted: Wed Jun 26 15:26:09 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:27:52 EDT References: <472@crystal.UUCP> <551@ucsfcgl.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Digital Research, Monterey, CA Lines: 28 Ken Arnold presented the following example while talking about the necessity of proper ordering when declaring register vars. > > register int i, j; > > for (i = 0; ...) > for (j = 0; ...) > It made me wonder if the following version would be any more efficient: register int i ; for( i = 0 ; ... ) { register int j ; for( j = 0 ;... ) } -- kral ihnp4!-------- \ mot! ---------- \ ucbvax!unisoft! > drivax!braun ucscc!--------- / amdahl!------- /