Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!infinity%udel-cc-vax2.delaware@udel-louie.ARPA
From: infinity%udel-cc-vax2.delaware@udel-louie.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: ETHER
Message-ID: <339@sri-arpa.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 7-Jul-85 00:38:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.339
Posted: Sun Jul  7 00:38:38 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 04:56:28 EDT
Lines: 26

From:  ALBERS 


	Ok, you obviously liked the last letter I sent (ha).

	Heres a more lunitic idea: (should be good for a laugh)

How about if we say that a mass causes a curvature in the ETHER instead
of a curvature in space?  Then how bout we say that it isn't a curvature
its a change in density.  The closer to a mass the higher the density
the farther away the lower the density.  How about we say that this 
change in density can maybe cause light to be bent because the ETHER 
is of higher density than when not near the mass.  How about we say
that it is really this ETHER 'pressure' that holds us to the planet?
How bout we say that time (process rate) is effected by a higher 
density of ETHER to the effect of causing time 'process rate' to slow?
How about if I explained in the same easy way how matter and magnetism
relate to ETHER in a clear and understandable way?  Hmmm... lets see...
light,gravity,magnetism,time,matter hmmm... sounds interesting.

But anyway, where am I messing up?  I find this an easier way to look
at things than to think of space curving.                             



							Eric