Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Is randomness natural? Message-ID: <963@mhuxt.UUCP> Date: Tue, 25-Jun-85 09:46:11 EDT Article-I.D.: mhuxt.963 Posted: Tue Jun 25 09:46:11 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Jun-85 06:39:13 EDT References: <371@iham1.UUCP> <946@mhuxt.UUCP> <> <505@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill Lines: 31 > >> > Most of what Karl Marx said cannot be tested. > >> > That which can be tested is wrong. > >> > > >> > Patrick Wyant > >> > >> That which can be tested is wrong??? So why bother testing anything? > >> I mean, if you can test it, it must be wrong, right? > >> Jeff Sonntag > > > >That which can be tested has been found to be wrong. > >-- > >Paul DuBois {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois --+-- > > This exchange is silly even by the standards of net.origins. The > less Americans know about the thought of Marx, the more certain they > are we have nothing to learn from Marx. If you want to attack > Marxism, please do it in net.politics.theory, where the subject > receives regular airing. > > Richard Carnes Nobody here is attacking Marxism, Richard. If you're so anxious to defend it, why don't you go back to net.politics.theory where you're much more likely to find someone interested in attacking it. And Paul - just what *is* your point? Do you even have one? Or do you just enjoy inserting ambiguity into scientific discussions? -- Jeff Sonntag ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j "I went down to the Scrub and Rub, but I had to sit in the back of the tub." - Dylan