Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!teddy!lkk
From: lkk@teddy.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Premises,Premises,Premises,... (is good logical?)
Message-ID: <840@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Jun-85 15:16:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: teddy.840
Posted: Fri Jun 28 15:16:30 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:10:35 EDT
References: <294@ihlpm.UUCP> <1310021@acf4.UUCP> <1110@pyuxd.UUCP> <809@teddy.UUCP> <1124@pyuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: lkk@teddy.UUCP (Larry K. Kolodney)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 33
Summary: 

In article <1124@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes:
>> In article <1110@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Arthur Pewtey) writes:
>> >>>Everyone on this planet
>> >>>thinks the best morality is based on good.  The problems occur when you ask
>> >>>each of them to define good. [ROSEN]
>> 
>> 
>> What about the Hell's angels.
>> Their morality seems
>> to be based on doing what is 'bad'. [LARRY KOLODNEY]
>
>Ask them.  Bad to you.  I'm sure it's perceived as perfectly all right to them.
>And that's the point.
>-- 
>Like a sturgeon (GLURG!), caught for the very first time...
>			Rich Rosen   ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr

I've already clarified this a number of times, but here goes again:

My belief was, when I posted that article, that Hell's Angels actually
beleived they were "bad" people.  I wasn't using MY standards to judge
them, this was just an (apparently mistaken) belief I had about their
world outlook.  Nevertheless, I'm sure you can find hardened criminals
somewhere who will tell you that they do "bad" things just for the sake
of being "bad".

       
-- 

Sport Death,
Larry Kolodney
(USENET) ...decvax!genrad!teddy!lkk
(INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc