Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!ut-sally!sakthi
From: sakthi@ut-sally.UUCP (Sakthi Subramanian)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics
Subject: Re: Income Disparities Based On Sex
Message-ID: <2296@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 13:24:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.2296
Posted: Mon Jul  8 13:24:06 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 06:55:41 EDT
References: <327@kontron.UUCP> <837@oddjob.UUCP>
Reply-To: sakthi@ut-sally.UUCP (Sakthi Subramanian)
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.women:6310 net.politics:9833
Summary: 

In article <837@oddjob.UUCP> cs1@oddjob.UUCP (Cheryl Stewart) writes:
>that they have to do the most of.  So your little triumph in finding a 
>little newspaper article that finds "scientific proof that most women 
>are unfit to do complex analytical and spatial tasks (i.e tasks that pay
>lots of money)"  is just a bunch of hogwash, and very closely akin to 
>the "science" of eugenics that Hitler used to justify his little experiments.
>
>Far be it from me to call you a NAZI, Mr. Cramer.
>
>                               Cheryl Stewart


I am referring to the words "little triumph" right on the first line.
It is one thing to fight for women's rights but entirely quite 
another to pick on  everything done by men and analyze them for
sexist content. Mr. Cramer in this case was probably merely trying
to point out another aspect of the problem, so he presented an article
that he had seen. To conclude that he considered that a "little triumph"
is to allow feminism to upset one's sense of judgement.

sakthi