Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!nsc!chongo
From: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon Noll)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: 2nd Annual Obfuscated Contest Winners
Message-ID: <2919@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 00:53:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.2919
Posted: Sat Jun 29 00:53:13 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 01:16:44 EDT
References: <2902@nsc.UUCP> <36@bbnccv.UUCP>
Reply-To: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon Noll)
Distribution: net
Organization: Rational Swamiconductor, Sanivale
Lines: 29
Keywords: precedence
Summary: 

In article <36@bbnccv.UUCP> keesan@bbnccv.UUCP (Morris M. Keesan) writes:
 >1. The most obscure program:
 >(submitted by Lennart Augustsson  )
 >
 >is not legal C, even though the 4.2BSD compiler (and presumably other PCC-based
 >compilers) processes it as the author apparently intended.
 >
 >For these two reasons, especially the first, I don't think this program
 >deserves a prize.  Also, this is a bug in the 4.2BSD compiler, and even more
 >so in the 4.2BSD lint, which should issue a warning even if the compiler is
 >being forgiving.

So it breaks on other compilers eh?  Well such is life with a Obfuscated C
contest!  One has to hand it to someone for finding a "hole" in a compiler,
and driving a truck through it. 

The contest rules stated that it has to be in "Common C".  There was nothing
to point out that it HAD to be standard C, K&R C, or Deathstar Unix C.
The ability to run an entry on other systems was a plus, not a rule.  Also,
we did not try, nor did we intend to check out each program on every
system/compiler.  We did not have time, or resources to do so!

Thank you for posting a suggested change so that other people might see
what the program does.   If anyone else finds another porting problem,
you might consider posting a bug fix to net.sources.bugs.

chongo  /\../\
-- 
no comment is a comment.