Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!crsp!gargoyle!sphinx!beth
From: beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Beth Christy)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.religion,net.motss
Subject: Re: Premarital Sex
Message-ID: <742@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 10:33:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: sphinx.742
Posted: Thu Jun 27 10:33:16 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Jun-85 02:19:38 EDT
References: <1648@amdahl.UUCP> <296@ihlpm.UUCP>, <2077@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Organization: U. Chicago - Computation Center
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.women:6132 net.religion:7186 net.motss:1792

From: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold), Message-ID: <2077@sdcrdcf.UUCP>:
>I don't object to anyone else have nonmarital sex but I'm not emotionally
>suited to physical intimacy without the commitment of an intention to
>marry, so it's not for me.
>
>I look forward to reading other comments.
>
>--Lee Gold

My comment:  In many states (most still?) I'm not *allowed* to marry
anyone I'd like to have sex with.  Something about no men involved
makes 'em nervous down at the marriage license bureau.

[I know, I know, no women involved makes 'em nervous too.  Poetic
 license, it was just poetic license (no marriage license, anyway).]

-- 

--JB                                 All we learn from history is that
                                       we learn nothing from history.