Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!mmar
From: mmar@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Mitchell Marks)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: application to women of word 'horny'
Message-ID: <768@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 04:38:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: sphinx.768
Posted: Thu Jul  4 04:38:31 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 05:37:53 EDT
Organization: U Chicago -- Linguistics Dept
Lines: 18

From: quint@topaz.ARPA (Amqueue)
> What makes you think that girls don't have strong physical reactions to the
> sight of aesthetically pleasing men? Girls get horny too, and just because
                                       ^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^
> dont have an obvious visible physical reaction doesnt mean we dont have the
> same desires.

     Has the application of the word `horny' to women become well
established in colloquial speech?  If you have opinions on this, or
introspections on your own usage, please see a discussion and questionnaire
that I have posted to net.nlang.  The article number (if that helps)
is  <767@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>.
     Thanks,

-- 

            -- Mitch Marks @ UChicago 
               ...ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!mmar