Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.5 $; site infoswx
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!infoswx!seefromline
From: al@infoswx.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Re: Ultralight advice sought
Message-ID: <1700005@infoswx>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 03:05:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: infoswx.1700005
Posted: Thu Jul  4 03:05:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 10:26:23 EDT
References: <188@SCIRTP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:SCIRTP:-18800:infoswx:1700005:000:575
Nf-From: infoswx.UUCP!al    Jul  4 02:05:00 1985


Argh.....

Ultralights should not be required to have the avionics requirements
of other aircraft.  For example, the atitude indicator is not needed 
at all.  When you are sitting on the seat with nothing but two pedals
in between you and everything else, you know your attitude!  Being
a Private Pilot (SEL), and an Ultralight pilot, I can see a large 
difference between the required avionics of an Ultralight and a 
Cherokee 180.  When the wind is whistling through your helmet, you
can determine accurately the attitude of your aircraft!

Al Gettier
Teknekron Infoswitch