Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.5 $; site uiucdcs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!seefromline
From: dahlback@uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: my increasingly lengthy reviews
Message-ID: <10700103@uiucdcs>
Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 16:34:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.10700103
Posted: Mon Jul 15 16:34:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 08:06:21 EDT
References: <6281@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Lines: 7
Nf-ID: #R:ucla-cs.ARPA:-628100:uiucdcs:10700103:000:361
Nf-From: uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA!dahlback    Jul 15 15:34:00 1985



I find some of the reviews rather long. It really depends, however, whether
I'm interested in the movie to begin with. Perhaps reviewers should use the
newspaper style (pyramid structure) more, with description-general opinion-
recommendation first (in 1 short paraphraph) and short paragraphs about the
other stuff after, where the reader can skip over them.