Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site haddock.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!haddock!stevel From: stevel@haddock.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news Subject: Re: Removing net.flame Message-ID: <14100008@haddock.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Jun-85 11:04:00 EDT Article-I.D.: haddock.14100008 Posted: Wed Jun 26 11:04:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 28-Jun-85 03:29:45 EDT References: <3892@alice.UUCP> Lines: 12 Nf-ID: #R:alice:-389200:haddock:14100008:000:486 Nf-From: haddock!stevel Jun 26 11:04:00 1985 How about if all sites aim 30% of the net.flame traffic through thier site into /dev/null. Since only some of the traffic will be lost it will look like the net in normal operation :-). Whenever net.flame has trouble on our machine I wait at least a week before fixing it, really help the spool space. net.flame is an adolecsent indulgence. Steve Ludlum {decvax ! cca | yale | ihnp4 | cbosgd}!ima!stevel Interactive Systems, 7th floor, 441 Stuart st, Boston, MA 02116; 617-247-1155