Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-galaxy!malik From: malik@galaxy.DEC (Karl Malik ZK01-1/F22 1-1440) Newsgroups: net.music Subject: silly argument Message-ID: <2957@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Jun-85 18:07:13 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.2957 Posted: Fri Jun 28 18:07:13 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:14:27 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 18 Subj; good and bad music argument Doug Allen recently said that his position in the good/bad music argument is that he thinks music which encourages 'intelligence, creativity and compassion' is good. Hey, how could I be against that? But, do we agree on which music that is? Even if Doug could convince everyone on USENET that there is such a thing as good and bad music, and that good music is that music which encourages intelligence, creativity and compassion, we STILL won't agree on what that means. Doug, what is the point of this line of argument? - Karl