Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Version 1.0 Netnews CMS/BITNET 5/19/85; site PSUVM.BITNET Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!gmw From: GMW@psuvm.BITNET Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm Subject: Re: Problems with 1200 baud Kermit Message-ID: <1916GMW@psuvm> Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 03:21:33 EDT Article-I.D.: psuvm.1916GMW Posted: Wed Jul 3 03:21:33 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 05:44:23 EDT References: <180@cernvax.UUCP> 1000014@acf4.UUCP Lines: 15 I have been using Eric Lavitsky's C64-Kermit at 1200 baud for months now with absolutely no ill effects. I have heard that terminal programs written in Basic can't keep up with 1200 baud, but Kermit is written in 6502 assembler, and certainly doesn't use the 60 Hz interrupt for RS-232 I/O. Don't forget that the 64's 1 Mhz CPU can process a couple hundred thousand instructions per second. Has anyone tried Kermit at 2400 baud? George M. Weaver Penn State Astronomy Dept. GMW at PSUVM.BITNET ...!allegra!psuvax1!gmw@psuvm.bitnet