Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!Margolin.Multics@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
From: Margolin.Multics@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: "Subject:" lines
Message-ID: <2443@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 15:40:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.2443
Posted: Sat Jun 29 15:40:42 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 03:00:46 EDT
Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 10

From: Barry Margolin 

Would people please try to use more useful Subject lines in their
postings than "Re:  SF-LOVERS Digest Vnn #nnn" (obviously automatically
generated by mail-readers)?  These are second only to notesfile's
"Orphaned response" subjects (please don't start flaming) in
uselessness.  Could the Moderator do something about this, like add
something in parentheses (for instance, the summary from the table of
contents entry that refers to the entry)?
                                        barmar