Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!teddy!lkk From: lkk@teddy.UUCP Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: Premises,Premises,Premises,... (is good logical?) Message-ID: <840@teddy.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Jun-85 15:16:30 EDT Article-I.D.: teddy.840 Posted: Fri Jun 28 15:16:30 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:10:35 EDT References: <294@ihlpm.UUCP> <1310021@acf4.UUCP> <1110@pyuxd.UUCP> <809@teddy.UUCP> <1124@pyuxd.UUCP> Reply-To: lkk@teddy.UUCP (Larry K. Kolodney) Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass. Lines: 33 Summary: In article <1124@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes: >> In article <1110@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Arthur Pewtey) writes: >> >>>Everyone on this planet >> >>>thinks the best morality is based on good. The problems occur when you ask >> >>>each of them to define good. [ROSEN] >> >> >> What about the Hell's angels. >> Their morality seems >> to be based on doing what is 'bad'. [LARRY KOLODNEY] > >Ask them. Bad to you. I'm sure it's perceived as perfectly all right to them. >And that's the point. >-- >Like a sturgeon (GLURG!), caught for the very first time... > Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr I've already clarified this a number of times, but here goes again: My belief was, when I posted that article, that Hell's Angels actually beleived they were "bad" people. I wasn't using MY standards to judge them, this was just an (apparently mistaken) belief I had about their world outlook. Nevertheless, I'm sure you can find hardened criminals somewhere who will tell you that they do "bad" things just for the sake of being "bad". -- Sport Death, Larry Kolodney (USENET) ...decvax!genrad!teddy!lkk (INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc