Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-ngp.UTEXAS
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!sunil
From: sunil@ut-ngp.UTEXAS (Sunil Trivedi)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Random Junk (Really subject lines)
Message-ID: <2000@ut-ngp.UTEXAS>
Date: Tue, 9-Jul-85 13:24:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.2000
Posted: Tue Jul  9 13:24:48 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 08:26:19 EDT
References: <1495@utah-gr.UUCP> <487@oliveb.UUCP> <114@desint.UUCP>
Organization: The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
Lines: 18

From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) Message-ID: <114@desint.UUCP>

> In article <487@oliveb.UUCP> jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre) writes:
> >Maybe we need a new header ala:
> > 	Subject: caramel sauce
> > 	Originally: hot pepper oil

> An excellent idea!  Rn and such readers could then follow the discussion
> thread properly.  How about "Original-Subject:", though?

I edit the Subject line and add a Keywords line. Does rn scan that line?
While we're into new names, how about "Ref-Subject:" instead?

					      Sunil Trivedi
					    sunil@ut-ngp.ARPA
					...!ut-sally!ut-ngp!sunil

     "Beam me up fast Scotty - there's no toilet paper down here!"