Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oberon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!uscvax!oberon!tli
From: tli@oberon.UUCP (Tony Li)
Newsgroups: net.bicycle
Subject: Re: Theft Resistance of U-shaped bicycle locks (QUERY)
Message-ID: <61@oberon.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 02:26:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: oberon.61
Posted: Thu Jun 27 02:26:59 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:30:02 EDT
References: <1468@bbncca.ARPA>
Reply-To: tli@oberon.UUCP (Tony Li)
Organization: U. of So. Calif., Los Angeles
Lines: 15

In article <1468@bbncca.ARPA> slipson@bbncca.ARPA (Samuel R. Lipson) writes:
    
    	I'd  like to hear from people who have had bicycles stolen due
    to the failure of their  "high-security"  (Citadel/  Kryptonite  type)
    lock, and not the "immovable object" your bike was locked to.
    
I've heard tales that a Kryptonite can be broken using liquid nitrogen, which
is much more believable than dry ice.  No proof for this, though.

My last lock wasn't a Kryptonite, and I regret it.
-- 
Tony Li ;-)		Usc Computer Science
Uucp: {sdcrdcf,randvax}!uscvax!tli
Csnet: tli@usc-cse.csnet
Arpa: tli@usc-ecl