Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!mit-eddie!nessus From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) Newsgroups: net.rumor,net.music Subject: Attention, Responsible Net Users! Message-ID: <4659@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Jul-85 10:21:36 EDT Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.4659 Posted: Tue Jul 9 10:21:36 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 06:26:11 EDT Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 15 Xref: watmath net.rumor:960 net.music:8195 I hope none of you seriously believe that I would entertain such frivolous discussions on the merit of J.S. Bach's music. I have admired many of JSB's works, and although you all know how I feel about Kate Bush's music, even to talk of such a comparison is obscene. Once again, it looks like this is the work of the fun-people eunuch-wizards. It was slightly amusing the first time they forged news article by me but I am beginning to get annoyed. I have attempted to contact David Dobkin, the site administrator-administrator at Princeton, in order to straighten things out. Is there anyone out there that is as upset as I am? If this keeps up the net will be in peril of losing its credibility. "We don't need no education" Doug Alan nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)