Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oddjob.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!oddjob!sandip From: sandip@oddjob.UUCP (Sandip Chakra) Newsgroups: net.sci Subject: Re: darwinism Message-ID: <835@oddjob.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 12:55:36 EDT Article-I.D.: oddjob.835 Posted: Thu Jul 4 12:55:36 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:22:46 EDT References: <526@psivax.UUCP> <1486@bbncca.ARPA> Organization: U. Chicago, Astronomy & Astrophysics Lines: 9 > Good points, Sarima. These persons were given the tomography because > they were KNOWN to have suffered accidents either prenatally, at birth, > or in early years, that very likely caused brain damage. This does not exclude the fact that they were able to do above average level work with a few percent of their brain cells. Suppose all of us were born with 95% of our brain cells damaged, then since we would be working at an above average level anyway, how do we know that we needed the other 95% of our brain cells ?