Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/13/84; site intelca.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!nsc!pesnta!amd!intelca!glen
From: glen@intelca.UUCP (Glen Shires)
Newsgroups: net.games
Subject: Re: Infocom games
Message-ID: <15@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Jul-85 17:30:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: intelca.15
Posted: Wed Jul 10 17:30:37 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jul-85 15:46:08 EDT
References: <4786@stolaf.UUCP> <1601@orca.UUCP>
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 26

> > Since Infocom games are so relatively useless after you finish them, and
> > since there's quite a few of us who play them here, what about trading them?
> > It would be a way of beating the price for those of us who aren't rich
> > but are opposed to piracy.  Would it contravene anything in the warranty?
> > I have Sorcerer and Enchanter.  I've played several of the others.  I'd
> > be interrested in especially in Suspect and Cutthroats.
> 
> The Infocom games are licensed for a single CPU only.
> 
> 
>   -=- Andrew Klossner   (decvax!tektronix!orca!andrew)       [UUCP]
>                         (orca!andrew.tektronix@csnet-relay)  [ARPA]

So trade CPU chips too!      :-)

	(Many are actually cheaper than the games themselves)

^ ^    Glen Shires, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
O O     Usenet: {ucbvax!amd,pur-ee,hplabs}!intelca!glen
 >      ARPA:   "amd!intelca!glen"@BERKELEY
\-/    --- stay mellow
-- 
^ ^    Glen Shires, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
O O     Usenet: {ucbvax!amd,pur-ee,hplabs}!intelca!glen
 >      ARPA:   "amd!intelca!glen"@BERKELEY
\-/    --- stay mellow