Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!greipa!pesnta!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!alex
From: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: My OFFENSIVE Postings
Message-ID: <6211@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 30-Jun-85 19:44:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.6211
Posted: Sun Jun 30 19:44:22 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 01:22:28 EDT
References: <1666@amdahl.UUCP> <6081@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2900@nsc.UUCP> <880@mtgzz.UUCP>
Reply-To: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP (Mud)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 25
Keywords: would I get in trouble for putting random keywords here?

Summary:

In article <880@mtgzz.UUCP> ecl@mtgzz.UUCP (e.c.leeper) writes:
>Now wait a minute!  Peter Reiher, one of the ucla-cs crowd, posts material that
>could by no stretch of the imagination be called "pre-adolescent dribble."
>(Shouldn't that be "drivel"?  That's my grammar flame for today!)  Anyone who
>regularly (or even irregularly) read net.movies realizes that there is some
>great stuff coming out of there along with the drivel....

Yes, she's right.  Despite our best efforts to prevent Peter from posting
his movie reviews (we've even complained to our system administrator), he
refuses to stop.  Damn it, Peter -- you are ruining UCLA's reputation on
the net.  Couldn't you just post one or two of them to net.auto, just for
fun?  Or maybe start calling the Leeper's obscene names, while criticizing
their sexual habits?  Please?  Show the net that UCLA hasn't lost it!

>Perhaps you owe Reiher (and others) an apology.  Don't tar them with the same
>brush as Alex.

No, they owe me an apology.  How *dare* they tar me with the same brush as
Peter?  If this continues, we're going to have to request that the upstream
sites get rid of net.movies!

Alex
:-)

Today's followups go to (drum roll please...) net.abortion!