Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site timeinc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!greenber
From: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Changing Roles
Message-ID: <282@timeinc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Jul-85 11:01:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: timeinc.282
Posted: Tue Jul  9 11:01:27 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 06:23:18 EDT
References: <993@ubc-vision.CDN> <202@ihlpl.UUCP>
Reply-To: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Organization: Time, Inc. - New York
Lines: 33
Summary: 

In article <202@ihlpl.UUCP> zubbie@ihlpl.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck) writes:
>> 
>Our bodies (male or female) react to different stimuli uniquely and
>those reactions are what makes us different. Women by nature are more
>bound by their bodies than are men.

Er, Jeanette, are you sure you want to say this?  I've seen too many
people indicate that this same "ultra"-bound is enough not to hire a
women on: you know, who needs those PMS types around when non-emotional
decisions have to made??

Seriously, each of us has seen some women who was not as effective at her
job around the time of her period due to these PMS.  If you were in a
hiring position, would you want to hire someone who (for a few days each
month) *might* not be as effective as a man?

>All that is asked by most women I know is that men overlook the purely
>physical differences, forget they exist for the purposes of conducting
>business or producing profitable work.

But what about the above??




-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross M. Greenberg  @ Time Inc, New York 
              --------->{ihnp4 | vax135}!timeinc!greenber<---------

I highly doubt that Time Inc. they would make me their spokesperson.