Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!amdahl!rtech!jeff From: jeff@rtech.UUCP (Jeff Lichtman) Newsgroups: net.nlang Subject: Re: Infix Message-ID: <499@rtech.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 05:08:55 EDT Article-I.D.: rtech.499 Posted: Thu Jun 20 05:08:55 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 28-Jun-85 01:25:21 EDT References: <2727@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA Lines: 21 > Take two words that you wouldn't think to use the infix with: > > ALABAMA > > TATTAMAGOUCHIE > > Now add the expletive infix to each one. If you compare your result with your > friends, you'll probably find that you insert the 'f' word in the same place. > > I end up with "Ala-f*ckin'-bama" and "Tattama-f*ckin'-gouchie"... I'm not sure > why we do it this way > > Dave Diamond Does the infix always come before the most strongly stressed syllable? -- Jeff Lichtman at rtech (Relational Technology, Inc.) aka Swazoo Koolak {amdahl, sun}!rtech!jeff {ucbvax, decvax}!mtxinu!rtech!jeff