Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!jordan From: jordan@ucbvax.ARPA (Jordan Hayes) Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame Subject: (not about) the consumption of toilet paper Message-ID: <8730@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 11:06:50 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8730 Posted: Wed Jul 3 11:06:50 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 05:03:05 EDT References: <241@luke.UUCP> <27705@lanl.ARPA> <191@ihlpl.UUCP> Reply-To: jordan@ucbvax.UUCP (Jordan Hayes) Followup-To: net.flame Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 21 Keywords: "think" "about" "it" Xref: watmath net.women:6222 net.flame:10959 Summary: a lesson in "correctly" edited articles... Charlie Sorsby (crs@lanl.UUCP) writes: >> Hey, folks... How about editing the subject line. This seems to have >> gone pretty far afield from its original inane topic. Jeanette Zobject (zubbie@ihlpl.UUCP) replies: > How's that. And then she goes on to put 23 lines of signature. Hmmm. Well, here are a few hints from a curious flamer. a) Check the Newsgroups line b) Check the Followup-To line (note that I have) c) Check the Subject line (note, again, that I have) d) Check the References line (do we NEED more than a line full?) e) Check the Keywords line (does it belong in the summary line?) And now for my signature... /jordan