Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 34) Message-ID: <707@cadovax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 11-Jul-85 21:10:06 EDT Article-I.D.: cadovax.707 Posted: Thu Jul 11 21:10:06 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:26:38 EDT References: <388@iham1.UUCP>, <603@cybvax0.UUCP> Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA Lines: 19 ................. >Does anyone not see the contradiction between #63 and #67 repeated here? > >In article <388@iham1.UUCP> rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk) writes: >> 63. Practically nowhere on the earth can one find the so- >> called ''geologic column.'' [a] In fact, on the > >> 67. Since there is no worldwide unconformity in the earth's >> sedimentary strata, the entire geologic record must have > >Mike Huybensz ...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh Obviously they're so confused among themselves that we can now state that Creationists disagree about the state of the ''geologic column'', and cite this as a reference. Keith Doyle # {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd