Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site inuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!inuxd!claus From: claus@inuxd.UUCP (David Claus) Newsgroups: net.kids,net.med Subject: Re: The Perils of Nutrasweet Message-ID: <780@inuxd.UUCP> Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 11:41:41 EDT Article-I.D.: inuxd.780 Posted: Mon Jul 15 11:41:41 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 06:13:49 EDT References: <771@burl.UUCP> <394@petrus.UUCP> <192@omen.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis Lines: 11 Xref: watmath net.kids:1472 net.med:1713 > Unfortunately, the laws are such that Sugar, which is a more damaging > substance, is not regulated in any significant way as far as adulterating > food with it is concerned. Is there any proof to this allegation? As far as I have heard the only harm eating sugar has is an increase in dental caries. What else does sugar do to give it such a bad reputation. Dave Claus AT&T/Indy