Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-miles!chabot From: chabot@miles.DEC (Sxyzyskzyik) Newsgroups: net.nlang Subject: Re: d*mn, sh*t, f*ck, un*x: Patterns You May Not Have Considered Message-ID: <3118@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 16:54:33 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.3118 Posted: Mon Jul 15 16:54:33 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:03:41 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 8 Keith Drescher (kad@ttrdc) > Maybe we could just use f?ck, d?mn, un?x, that solved the > ambiguity. Sh?t still presents a problem though ...... So does "f?ck"--how about "feck" (what you don't have when you're "feckless"). :-) L S Chabot ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot chabot%amber.dec@decwrl.arpa