Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott
From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (N. Ersha)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.social
Subject: Re: "pleasant" work vs. "dangerous" work
Message-ID: <547@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 09:22:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou2g.547
Posted: Fri Jul 12 09:22:36 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jul-85 11:36:35 EDT
References: <688@lll-crg.ARPA>
Organization: rest, relative to the universe
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.women:6360 net.social:817



> I note a major contradiction here.  1) Divorced fathers were not given
> custody.  This implies that divorced *mothers* were.  We now have a single
> (divorced) woman with children to take care of, which conflicts with 2) a
> single woman would not have kids to support.  Explain, please?


ALIMONY!

			SJB