Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!utcs!mnetor!fred
From: fred@mnetor.UUCP
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Lotteries
Message-ID: <1279@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 09:54:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1279
Posted: Fri Jul 12 09:54:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 10:25:45 EDT
References: <1121@ubc-cs.UUCP> <1110@mnetor.UUCP> <695@lsuc.UUCP> <1218@mnetor.UUCP> <702@lsuc.UUCP> <1243@utcsri.UUCP> <706@lsuc.UUCP>
Reply-To: fred@mnetor.UUCP (Fred Williams)
Distribution: can
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 19
Summary: 

In article <706@lsuc.UUCP> jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura|Barrister Jimomura Solicitor|Toronto) writes:
>elses).  I don't feel my above statement makes your reasoning invalid.
>Maybe you're right.  I guess I just don't *feel* that gamblings wrong.
>I have no religious basis for morality (not in the traditional sense)
>which is what I expected Fred to put forward (or anybody else).
>

	I thought my ears were burning.  Please don't get me wrong.
I am not trying to dictate morality to the net. I'm merely giving
my ideas in the hope of stimulating a little further action on the
net. 
	Do my ideas of morality have a religous basis?  Well, I
really don't want to get into a discussion on religon, certainly
not in this newsgroup, it's not the place. I don't follow an organised
religon. My ideas of morality, I like to think, are based on logic,
or at least as close as I can come.

Cheers,		Fred Williams