Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watcgl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!water!watcgl!srneely From: srneely@watcgl.UUCP (Shawn Neely) Newsgroups: net.graphics Subject: Re: 3d fractal generator & shader [posted to net.sources] Message-ID: <2153@watcgl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Jul-85 10:06:36 EDT Article-I.D.: watcgl.2153 Posted: Fri Jul 5 10:06:36 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:35:42 EDT References: <231@harvard.ARPA> Reply-To: srneely@watcgl.UUCP (Shawn Neely) Distribution: net Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 4 Summary: Is it standard terminology to label the dimensionality of a fractal by the next higher integer? I guess "Here is a 3-D fractal" is sometimes more appropriate than "Here is a 2.9375-D fractal".