Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site luke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!petsd!pesnta!hplabs!oliveb!bene!luke!itkin From: itkin@luke.UUCP (Steven List) Newsgroups: net.news,net.news.group Subject: Re: Removing net.flame Message-ID: <268@luke.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 13:28:08 EDT Article-I.D.: luke.268 Posted: Tue Jul 2 13:28:08 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 06:47:17 EDT References: <3892@alice.UUCP> <484@oliveb.UUCP> Reply-To: itkin@luke.UUCP (Steven List) Organization: Benetics Corp, Mt.View, CA Lines: 20 Xref: watmath net.news:3573 net.news.group:3220 Summary: In article <484@oliveb.UUCP> jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre) writes: >What news groups a site carries is between that site and it's neighbors. >If the administration of a site feels that a group is inappropriate then >cut it off and advise your neighbors that you are doing so. Don't tell >the rest of the net what to do. Yay Jerry! While I might not love all of what passes through net.flame, I do enjoy reading it most of the time. Since oliveb is our feed, I'm really pleased with Jerry's attitude. Thus far, I've not heard any CONVINCING arguments for removing net.flame. It seems that the simplest thing to do is ignore it if you don't like it. I've actually heard of people who've never even READ net.flame (shocking! :^>~). -- *** * Steven List @ Benetics Corporation, Mt. View, CA * Just part of the stock at "Uncle Bene's Farm" * {cdp,greipa,idi,oliveb,sun,tolerant}!bene!luke!steven ***