Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!pesnta!greipa!decwrl!decvax!yale!inmet!nrh
From: nrh@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Re: Freedom of Speech and Assembly i
Message-ID: <28200028@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 6-Jul-85 04:47:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.28200028
Posted: Sat Jul  6 04:47:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 03:20:45 EDT
References: <706@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs:-70600:inmet:28200028:000:453
Nf-From: inmet!nrh    Jul  5 02:47:00 1985


>/**** inmet:net.politics.t / umcp-cs!mangoe /  8:23 pm  Jul  3, 1985 ****/
>And the third
>important question: how do you prevent the rich from subverting a system in
>which the right to property is supreme?

The right to property is not "supreme" in the sense that it gives you
other rights. In particular, a person who owns a million acres has
no choices about what you do on your single acre.

>
>Charley Wingate  umcp-cs!mangoe
>/* ---------- */
>