Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site phri.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!lonetto From: lonetto@phri.UUCP (Michael Lonetto) Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: Re: ETHER Message-ID: <311@phri.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 14:46:03 EDT Article-I.D.: phri.311 Posted: Thu Jul 4 14:46:03 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jul-85 09:48:50 EDT References: <339@sri-arpa.ARPA> Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY) Lines: 21 > > How about if we say that a mass causes a curvature in the ETHER instead > of a curvature in space? Then how bout we say that it isn't a curvature > its a change in density. The closer to a mass the higher the density > the farther away the lower the density. How about we say that this > change in density can maybe cause light to be bent because the ETHER > is of higher density than when not near the mass. How about we say > that it is really this ETHER 'pressure' that holds us to the planet? > > But anyway, where am I messing up? I find this an easier way to look > at things than to think of space curving. > > Eric It's fine except that the ETHER doesn't have mass, it's made of gravity. Now if you could measure the density of gravitrons.... -- ____________________ Michael Lonetto PHRI NYC (allegra!phri!lonetto) Do you think it's REAL?