Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!alex From: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: My OFFENSIVE Postings Message-ID: <6169@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 07:00:38 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.6169 Posted: Thu Jun 27 07:00:38 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:30:56 EDT References: <1666@amdahl.UUCP> <6081@ucla-cs.ARPA> <414@enmasse.UUCP> Reply-To: alex@ucla-cs.UUCP (Mud) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 22 Keywords: begin, end, do, while, ... In article <414@enmasse.UUCP> mroddy@enmasse.UUCP (Mark Roddy) writes: >Sorry Alex, that's not how it works. No matter how sorry you are, no >one in netland will let you lose one iota of guilt...your dirty >deed was done and there ain't no way to undo it. Thanks for your brilliant comments Mark. Show your posting to the National Enquirer and maybe you'll be able to get a job as a columnist. I'm not trying to absolve myself from guilt. I CHANGED THE FOLLOWUP LINES! And of course, I can't undo what I did. (I'm assuming, of course that it is too late to cancel the offending articles.) But I did apologize. And like it or not, pal, that's all I can do about it. Perhaps you'd perfer it if I hadn't apologized, and kept on changing the followup lines. Maybe you'd be happier if I changed my "Reply-To:" line to your account? I didn't say my action was bright, but I did apologize for it. If that's not good enough for you then that's just too bad, isn't it? I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Alex Followups to random groups. :-)