Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ix654
From: ix654@sdcc6.UUCP (ix654)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Novice Needs 35mm Recommendations
Message-ID: <2143@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Jul-85 17:20:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.2143
Posted: Thu Jul 11 17:20:06 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:22:18 EDT
References: <24800001@gypsy.UUCP> <145@python.UUCP> <845@mako.UUCP> <149@python.UUCP>
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 14
Keywords: eye glasses, viewfinders

In article <149@python.UUCP>, johnm@python.UUCP (J. Montgomery) writes:
> > The Olympus OM-4 (and OM-3?) have built-in diopter correction for
> > my OM-4 easier to focus than my OM-2 because I was able to fine-tune it
> > ....

> This is a good idea, and it is also possible with the Nikon F3HP.  (Un-
> fortunately, my own correction is too strong for this to be useful.)

Please, don't  forget the Pentax LX, which is all too often being
overlooked when professional cameras are discussed. Diopter
correction was, as far as I know, introduced for the first time in
this SLR.
                                   Loyal Pentax fan,
                                   E. J. Behr (UCSD, Math)