Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site angband.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!mordor!angband!sjc
From: sjc@angband.UUCP (Steve Correll)
Newsgroups: net.audio,net.consumers
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Turntable Controversy
Message-ID: <65@angband.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 15:40:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: angband.65
Posted: Wed Jul  3 15:40:41 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 06:04:50 EDT
References: <496@leadsv.UUCP> <430@enmasse.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.audio:5237 net.consumers:2515

> > 	A good rule of thumb for buying turntables depends on the price
> > range.  If you are looking at cheaper models, the direct drive is better
> >  ...When you are looking at an expensive range of turntables, the
> > belt drive tables are better.
> 
> 	Not true.  How come radio stations mostly use direct drive.

Radio station DJs want to "back cue" records so as to start precisely
where the music begins. Loosely speaking, the technique involves
positioning the stylus at exactly the starting point, clamping the
platter, turning the motor on, and letting go when you want the music
to start. This requires the turntable to stall gracefully, start fast,
and deliver lots of torque, wholly apart from questions of fidelity.
-- 
                                                           --Steve Correll
sjc@s1-b.ARPA, ...!decvax!decwrl!mordor!sjc, or ...!ucbvax!dual!mordor!sjc