Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646 From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: Objectivism Message-ID: <1310028@acf4.UUCP> Date: Wed, 3-Jul-85 04:07:00 EDT Article-I.D.: acf4.1310028 Posted: Wed Jul 3 04:07:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 06:17:37 EDT References: <625@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 7 >/* mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) / 12:12 pm Jul 2, 1985 */ >Secondly, it fails to treat a third possibility: that there is in fact a >code, but that the code is (for one reason or another) at least partly >obscured. What point is there in speculating about a code that is "obscured?"