Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!ccrdave
From: ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless)
Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish
Subject: Re: Footnote to Samet's PS (SUE!!)
Message-ID: <330@ucdavis.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 22:15:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucdavis.330
Posted: Thu Jul  4 22:15:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Jul-85 05:39:04 EDT
References: <277@ucdavis.UUCP> <329@mhuxi.UUCP> <611@sfmag.UUCP> <669@digi-g.UUCP>
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 18


> The  use  of  the  word "Jew" tends to obscure what might
> properly be  called  "Christ-killer". I think we should avoid  accepting
> false connotations of any kind. [LEROY]

I think I am going to be sick!  If anyone wants to call anyone on
this net a Christ-killer, I want to see the fingerprints and the
evidence.  Otherwise, I think a lawsuit for defamation of character
is in order.  [Personally, I think the whole thing was a frameup
by some second century Romans, and even the New Testament says that
children are born Holy, i.e. without sin or responsibility for
the actions of others.  (Luke 2:23) The whole "original sin" trip
isn't in the New Testament.]

Whether you call "Sodomites" by "Gay" or not, they ARE guilty of
doing their thing.  Many will even proudly confess their acts.
We just spent weeks going over what the Torah says about Homosexuals.
Do we have to now go through what Paul said?