Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site luke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!petsd!pesnta!hplabs!oliveb!bene!luke!itkin
From: itkin@luke.UUCP (Steven List)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Removing net.flame
Message-ID: <268@luke.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 13:28:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: luke.268
Posted: Tue Jul  2 13:28:08 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 06:47:17 EDT
References: <3892@alice.UUCP> <484@oliveb.UUCP>
Reply-To: itkin@luke.UUCP (Steven List)
Organization: Benetics Corp, Mt.View, CA
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.news:3573 net.news.group:3220
Summary: 

In article <484@oliveb.UUCP> jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre) writes:
>What news groups a site carries is between that site and it's neighbors.
>If the administration of a site feels that a group is inappropriate then
>cut it off and advise your neighbors that you are doing so.  Don't tell
>the rest of the net what to do.

Yay Jerry!  While I might not love all of what passes through net.flame,
I do enjoy reading it most of the time.  Since oliveb is our feed, I'm
really pleased with Jerry's attitude.  Thus far, I've not heard any
CONVINCING arguments for removing net.flame.

It seems that the simplest thing to do is ignore it if you don't like
it.  I've actually heard of people who've never even READ net.flame
(shocking! :^>~).
-- 
***
*  Steven List @ Benetics Corporation, Mt. View, CA
*  Just part of the stock at "Uncle Bene's Farm"
*  {cdp,greipa,idi,oliveb,sun,tolerant}!bene!luke!steven
***