Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!utcs!mnetor!fred From: fred@mnetor.UUCP Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: Lotteries Message-ID: <1279@mnetor.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 09:54:40 EDT Article-I.D.: mnetor.1279 Posted: Fri Jul 12 09:54:40 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 10:25:45 EDT References: <1121@ubc-cs.UUCP> <1110@mnetor.UUCP> <695@lsuc.UUCP> <1218@mnetor.UUCP> <702@lsuc.UUCP> <1243@utcsri.UUCP> <706@lsuc.UUCP> Reply-To: fred@mnetor.UUCP (Fred Williams) Distribution: can Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada Lines: 19 Summary: In article <706@lsuc.UUCP> jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura|Barrister Jimomura Solicitor|Toronto) writes: >elses). I don't feel my above statement makes your reasoning invalid. >Maybe you're right. I guess I just don't *feel* that gamblings wrong. >I have no religious basis for morality (not in the traditional sense) >which is what I expected Fred to put forward (or anybody else). > I thought my ears were burning. Please don't get me wrong. I am not trying to dictate morality to the net. I'm merely giving my ideas in the hope of stimulating a little further action on the net. Do my ideas of morality have a religous basis? Well, I really don't want to get into a discussion on religon, certainly not in this newsgroup, it's not the place. I don't follow an organised religon. My ideas of morality, I like to think, are based on logic, or at least as close as I can come. Cheers, Fred Williams