Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!crsp!gargoyle!sphinx!beth From: beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Beth Christy) Newsgroups: net.women,net.religion,net.motss Subject: Re: Premarital Sex Message-ID: <742@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 10:33:16 EDT Article-I.D.: sphinx.742 Posted: Thu Jun 27 10:33:16 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Jun-85 02:19:38 EDT References: <1648@amdahl.UUCP> <296@ihlpm.UUCP>, <2077@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Organization: U. Chicago - Computation Center Lines: 21 Xref: watmath net.women:6132 net.religion:7186 net.motss:1792 From: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold), Message-ID: <2077@sdcrdcf.UUCP>: >I don't object to anyone else have nonmarital sex but I'm not emotionally >suited to physical intimacy without the commitment of an intention to >marry, so it's not for me. > >I look forward to reading other comments. > >--Lee Gold My comment: In many states (most still?) I'm not *allowed* to marry anyone I'd like to have sex with. Something about no men involved makes 'em nervous down at the marriage license bureau. [I know, I know, no women involved makes 'em nervous too. Poetic license, it was just poetic license (no marriage license, anyway).] -- --JB All we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.