Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site inuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!inuxd!claus
From: claus@inuxd.UUCP (David Claus)
Newsgroups: net.kids,net.med
Subject: Re: The Perils of Nutrasweet
Message-ID: <780@inuxd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 11:41:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: inuxd.780
Posted: Mon Jul 15 11:41:41 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 06:13:49 EDT
References: <771@burl.UUCP> <394@petrus.UUCP> <192@omen.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.kids:1472 net.med:1713

> Unfortunately, the laws are such that Sugar, which is a more damaging
> substance, is not regulated in any significant way as far as adulterating
> food with it is concerned.

Is there any proof to this allegation?  As far as I have heard
the only harm eating sugar has is an increase in dental caries.

What else does sugar do to give it such a bad reputation.

Dave Claus
AT&T/Indy