Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!mit-eddie!nessus
From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan)
Newsgroups: net.rumor,net.music
Subject: Attention, Responsible Net Users!
Message-ID: <4659@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Jul-85 10:21:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.4659
Posted: Tue Jul  9 10:21:36 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 06:26:11 EDT
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.rumor:960 net.music:8195

I hope none of you seriously believe that I would entertain such
frivolous discussions on the merit of J.S. Bach's music.  I have
admired many of JSB's works, and although you all know how I feel about
Kate Bush's music, even to talk of such a comparison is obscene.  Once
again, it looks like this is the work of the fun-people eunuch-wizards.
It was slightly amusing the first time they forged news article by me
but I am beginning to get annoyed.  I have attempted to contact David
Dobkin, the site administrator-administrator at Princeton, in order to
straighten things out.  Is there anyone out there that is as upset as I am?
If this keeps up the net will be in peril of losing its credibility.

		"We don't need no education"

		Doug Alan
		nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)