Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.13 $; site iuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!jec
From: jec@iuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: ANTIC Online CES Wrapup report
Message-ID: <500010@iuvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 14:44:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: iuvax.500010
Posted: Tue Jul  2 14:44:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 09:20:31 EDT
References: <219@bocar.UUCP>
Lines: 12
Nf-ID: #R:bocar:-21900:iuvax:500010:000:503
Nf-From: iuvax!jec    Jul  2 13:44:00 1985


The ST520 has the advantage of more memory if you don't use GEM, the 260
doesn't give you that choice.  The ST520's GEM should also be easier to
fix in the event of errors (which are to be expected).  

Besides, I don't think you should ignore the ST520 ROM upgrade possibility.
I suspect that someone, if not Atari, will make use of it.

James E. Conley			Usenet: {ihnp4,pur-ee,purdue}!iuvax!jec
I.U. Dept. of Linguistics	Phone:	(812) 335-6458
401 Lindley Hall			(812) 332-3514
Bloomington, IN. 47405