Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-galaxy!malik
From: malik@galaxy.DEC (Karl Malik ZK01-1/F22 1-1440)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: silly argument
Message-ID: <2957@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Jun-85 18:07:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2957
Posted: Fri Jun 28 18:07:13 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jul-85 06:14:27 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 18

Subj; good and bad music argument

	Doug Allen recently said that his position in the good/bad
music argument is that he thinks music which encourages 'intelligence,
creativity and compassion' is good.

	Hey, how could I be against that?

	But, do we agree on which music that is?

	Even if Doug could convince everyone on USENET that there is such 
a thing as good and bad music, and that good music is that music which 
encourages intelligence, creativity and compassion, we STILL won't
agree on what that means.

	Doug, what is the point of this line of argument?

							- Karl