Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!unc!fsks
From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: intelligence/a different view/NO SOCIO BIO STUFF/promise
Message-ID: <504@unc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 17:50:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.504
Posted: Thu Jun 27 17:50:15 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 01:31:00 EDT
References: 
Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 31
Summary: 


In article  dls@mtgzz.UUCP (Dale. L. Skran) writes:
>	Play the game/be realistic. This is going to sound like I've
>	sold out, but I think it's true. Whatever women say, they are still
>	dominated by some fairly traditional images. They want muscular,
>	sexy men who speak in soft sensuous tones and ply their every whim.
>	Well, some part of them wants this.
>	[...]
>	If you're not the classy kind of guy, forget the classy women.
>	There are others out there who will go for you - if you bother
>	to look them up. Let me be blunt about it: swans fly with swans
>	and ducks fly with ducks.

What do you mean by swans and ducks?  Beautiful and ugly people?
What about all these women who have been posting articles and
sending me E-mail about how they don't care much about a man's looks?
It seems like I should be able to find hundreds of _gorgeous_ women
who will want me in spite of my own _ordinary_ looks.
Or is it only the _plainer_ women who are unconcerned about a man's looks?

The following is :-)

>	  You may find that a duck in hand is worth a flock of swans in the sky.

And an orgasm in the bush is worth two in the hand.

>	This is REALLY not the opinion of AT&T. Really!

This has piqued my curiosity.  What _is_ AT&T's opinion?

	Frank Silbermann