Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646 From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Discrimination and AA and Racism Message-ID: <1340248@acf4.UUCP> Date: Mon, 1-Jul-85 15:32:00 EDT Article-I.D.: acf4.1340248 Posted: Mon Jul 1 15:32:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Jul-85 04:04:18 EDT References: <292@looking.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 19 >/* carnes@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Richard Carnes) / 4:49 pm Jun 26, 1985 */ >>Tell me, Mr. Carnes, if you don't believe in the non-coercion principle, >>what is the basis for your objection to rape? murder? robbery? If the >>objection is based on law, then a government that repeals those laws >>has taken away your objections. >Mr. Cramer now feigns total ignorance of all non-libertarian moral >philosophy. Flame away -- why don't you tell them I support rape and >murder -- I won't respond, since we seem to mean two completely >different things by "intelligent discussion." Richard, I believe it may have been Clayton's intention to demonstrate that the principles you espouse are inconsistent. In order to do this, it is necessary for him to ask for an explicit statement of your moral philosophy, i.e., perhaps his question was indeed a question and not merely a criticism. I think that this discussion could get interesting. Mike Sykora