Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bbnccv.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!bbnccv!sdyer From: sdyer@bbnccv.UUCP (Steve Dyer) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 27) Message-ID: <19@bbnccv.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24-Jun-85 02:28:51 EDT Article-I.D.: bbnccv.19 Posted: Mon Jun 24 02:28:51 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Jun-85 03:46:22 EDT References: <376@iham1.UUCP> <277@phri.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, MA Lines: 11 Such a collection of nonsense I haven't seen in a while. Where are the apologists such as DuBois now, in the face of such drivel? What has he (and any other "creation scientists") to say when they are so embarassed by their colleagues? More meta-discussions perhaps? And finally, what does Kukuk actually DO at Bell Labs? I think I'm going to tell my broker to sell... -- /Steve Dyer {decvax,linus,ima,ihnp4}!bbncca!sdyer sdyer@bbnccv.ARPA