Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!gargoyle!carnes From: carnes@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Richard Carnes) Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics Subject: Re: Discrimination and AA Message-ID: <511@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Jun-85 16:49:41 EDT Article-I.D.: gargoyle.511 Posted: Wed Jun 26 16:49:41 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Jun-85 02:22:14 EDT References: <496@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <> Organization: U. Chicago - Computer Science Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.women:6133 net.politics:9628 In article <> cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes: >Tell me, Mr. Carnes, if you don't believe in the non-coercion principle, >what is the basis for your objection to rape? murder? robbery? If the >objection is based on law, then a government that repeals those laws >has taken away your objections. Mr. Cramer now feigns total ignorance of all non-libertarian moral philosophy. Flame away -- why don't you tell them I support rape and murder -- I won't respond, since we seem to mean two completely different things by "intelligent discussion." When will I learn that it's pointless to argue with right-wing ideologues. --Slow Learner in Chicago