Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd
From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 34)
Message-ID: <707@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Jul-85 21:10:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: cadovax.707
Posted: Thu Jul 11 21:10:06 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:26:38 EDT
References: <388@iham1.UUCP>, <603@cybvax0.UUCP>
Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA
Lines: 19

.................
>Does anyone not see the contradiction between #63 and #67 repeated here?
>
>In article <388@iham1.UUCP> rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk) writes:
>>        63.  Practically nowhere on the earth  can  one  find  the  so-
>>             called   ''geologic   column.''   [a]   In  fact,  on  the
>
>>        67.  Since there is no worldwide unconformity  in  the  earth's
>>             sedimentary  strata,  the entire geologic record must have
>
>Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh

Obviously they're so confused among themselves that we can now state that
Creationists disagree about the state of the ''geologic column'', and
cite this as a reference.

Keith Doyle
#  {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd