Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site azure.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!azure!chrisa
From: chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen)
Newsgroups: net.singles,net.social
Subject: Re: Intelligence (and breasts)
Message-ID: <329@azure.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 04:53:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: azure.329
Posted: Mon Jul  8 04:53:48 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jul-85 05:34:36 EDT
References: <323@azure.UUCP> <8733@ucbvax.ARPA>
Reply-To: chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen)
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.singles:7711 net.social:806
Summary: 

>In article <323@azure.UUCP> chrisa@azure.UUCP (Chris Andersen) writes:
>
>>Frankly, I think that any overabundent physical attribute is *too*
>>much.  Small breast are just as sexy (if not sexier) then large
>>breasts.  But I'm not a breast man.  To me the sexiest physical
>>attribute is either eyes, or legs.

By the way, someone wrote me a letter asking me not to start up the "big
breast vs. little breast" discussion again.  Well, since I've only started
to use the net in the last two months, I wasn't here when this was last 
done, but I get the impression that it filled more space then was nescessary.
Anyways, I don't want to be the start of a long and lasting discussion that
falls down to a nasty level (such as a previous discussion on bathroom 
behaviour did).  If you feel you have something real to contribute to the net
as a whole regarding this topic, then respond in this newsgroup, otherwise
respond to me directly through E-Mail.  Thanks.

Chris Andersen