Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!pesnta!greipa!decwrl!decvax!yale!inmet!nrh From: nrh@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Re: Freedom of Speech and Assembly i Message-ID: <28200028@inmet.UUCP> Date: Sat, 6-Jul-85 04:47:00 EDT Article-I.D.: inmet.28200028 Posted: Sat Jul 6 04:47:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 03:20:45 EDT References: <706@umcp-cs.UUCP> Lines: 14 Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs:-70600:inmet:28200028:000:453 Nf-From: inmet!nrh Jul 5 02:47:00 1985 >/**** inmet:net.politics.t / umcp-cs!mangoe / 8:23 pm Jul 3, 1985 ****/ >And the third >important question: how do you prevent the rich from subverting a system in >which the right to property is supreme? The right to property is not "supreme" in the sense that it gives you other rights. In particular, a person who owns a million acres has no choices about what you do on your single acre. > >Charley Wingate umcp-cs!mangoe >/* ---------- */ >