Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!hao!noao!terak!doug From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) Newsgroups: net.aviation Subject: Re: Ultralight advice sought Message-ID: <635@terak.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 12:20:55 EDT Article-I.D.: terak.635 Posted: Mon Jul 8 12:20:55 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 15-Jul-85 07:17:20 EDT References: <188@SCIRTP> <1700005@infoswx> Organization: Terak Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Lines: 10 > Ultralights should not be required to have the avionics requirements > of other aircraft. For example, the atitude indicator is not needed > at all. The attitude indicator is not required on VFR aircraft. If it is, I'm in deep dookie with the FAA 'cuz I don't even have a DG or a Rate-of- Climb in my 120 :-) -- Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{ihnp4,seismo,decvax}!noao!terak!doug ^^^^^--- soon to be CalComp