Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mordor.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!mordor!@S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:WHOLEY@CMU-CS-C.ARPA From: @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:WHOLEY@CMU-CS-C.ARPA Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Filming in Space Message-ID: <2633@mordor.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 16:14:43 EDT Article-I.D.: mordor.2633 Posted: Fri Jul 12 16:14:43 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 16-Jul-85 01:55:51 EDT Sender: daemon@mordor.UUCP Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL Lines: 21 From: Skef WholeyFrom: kvue!spangler (Lance Spangler) That is, the feed reel and the take up reel literally sat on top of each other, with a small hub between each to take care of the difference in reel speed. I'm sure Arriflex or who ever is making the motion picture cameras for NASA these days could whip one out. A big point Arri is making in its advertisements lately is that the Arri cameras used for these (non-IMAX) films are "off-the-shelf" equipment. An interesting article on filming aboard the shuttle appears in a recent issue of American Cinematographer (May 1985, I think). These are the first off-the-shelf cameras ever used by NASA, and they finally seem to have accepted that they needn't build their own. The article doesn't mention the gyroscoping problem, so maybe it wasn't as big a problem (at least for the 16mm cameras) as some think. Or maybe the author wasn't ready to explain physics to a bunch of movie people.