Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!phri!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.social
Subject: Re: AA just institutionalizes class struggle
Message-ID: <1570001@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jul-85 00:53:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1570001
Posted: Thu Jul  4 00:53:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 06:35:09 EDT
References: <297@looking.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 13

>/* jchapman@watcgl.UUCP (john chapman) /  1:12 pm  Jun 24, 1985 */

> As long as how you spend/sell doesn't affect anyone then you're right; as
> soon as the way you or a class of people behave acts to lower the quality
> (or potential quality) of life for someone else (or some class) then they
> do have a right to attempt to control it.

That would mean that if you decided to date X rather than Y, Y would have
a right to force you to date her instead.  Sounds reasonable, right?

I guess ENVY only used to be a dirty word.  Now we have self-righteous envy.

						Mike Sykora