Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics,net.social
Subject: Re: Discrimination against women and statistics
Message-ID: <1862@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 16:52:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.1862
Posted: Sat Jun 29 16:52:59 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 02:32:22 EDT
References: <482@ttidcc.UUCP> <8203@ucbvax.ARPA> <8204@ucbvax.ARPA> <581@mtung.UUCP> <405@h-sc1.UUCP>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.women:6166 net.politics:9650 net.social:756

In article <405@h-sc1.UUCP> desjardins@h-sc1.UUCP (marie desjardins) writes:
>Mobility matters because your husband (working,
>naturally, in a high-paying job) may have to relocate and you need
>to follow him.  So why shouldn't the man follow his wife?  Well,
>because he has a higher-paying job, naturally.

Does this mean you're willing to marry a man who makes less money than you?
That you're willing to "marry below your class"? I would suspect many women
are not. I'd be happy to hear if I'm wrong.
-- 

 Phil Ngai +1 408 749 5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA