Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!Margolin.Multics@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA From: Margolin.Multics@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: "Subject:" lines Message-ID: <2443@topaz.ARPA> Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 15:40:42 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.2443 Posted: Sat Jun 29 15:40:42 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 03:00:46 EDT Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 10 From: Barry MargolinWould people please try to use more useful Subject lines in their postings than "Re: SF-LOVERS Digest Vnn #nnn" (obviously automatically generated by mail-readers)? These are second only to notesfile's "Orphaned response" subjects (please don't start flaming) in uselessness. Could the Moderator do something about this, like add something in parentheses (for instance, the summary from the table of contents entry that refers to the entry)? barmar