Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!unc!fsks From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: intelligence/a different view/NO SOCIO BIO STUFF/promise Message-ID: <504@unc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 17:50:15 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.504 Posted: Thu Jun 27 17:50:15 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Jun-85 01:31:00 EDT References:Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill Lines: 31 Summary: In article dls@mtgzz.UUCP (Dale. L. Skran) writes: > Play the game/be realistic. This is going to sound like I've > sold out, but I think it's true. Whatever women say, they are still > dominated by some fairly traditional images. They want muscular, > sexy men who speak in soft sensuous tones and ply their every whim. > Well, some part of them wants this. > [...] > If you're not the classy kind of guy, forget the classy women. > There are others out there who will go for you - if you bother > to look them up. Let me be blunt about it: swans fly with swans > and ducks fly with ducks. What do you mean by swans and ducks? Beautiful and ugly people? What about all these women who have been posting articles and sending me E-mail about how they don't care much about a man's looks? It seems like I should be able to find hundreds of _gorgeous_ women who will want me in spite of my own _ordinary_ looks. Or is it only the _plainer_ women who are unconcerned about a man's looks? The following is :-) > You may find that a duck in hand is worth a flock of swans in the sky. And an orgasm in the bush is worth two in the hand. > This is REALLY not the opinion of AT&T. Really! This has piqued my curiosity. What _is_ AT&T's opinion? Frank Silbermann