Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ix654 From: ix654@sdcc6.UUCP (ix654) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Novice Needs 35mm Recommendations Message-ID: <2143@sdcc6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 11-Jul-85 17:20:06 EDT Article-I.D.: sdcc6.2143 Posted: Thu Jul 11 17:20:06 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 07:22:18 EDT References: <24800001@gypsy.UUCP> <145@python.UUCP> <845@mako.UUCP> <149@python.UUCP> Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center Lines: 14 Keywords: eye glasses, viewfinders In article <149@python.UUCP>, johnm@python.UUCP (J. Montgomery) writes: > > The Olympus OM-4 (and OM-3?) have built-in diopter correction for > > my OM-4 easier to focus than my OM-2 because I was able to fine-tune it > > .... > This is a good idea, and it is also possible with the Nikon F3HP. (Un- > fortunately, my own correction is too strong for this to be useful.) Please, don't forget the Pentax LX, which is all too often being overlooked when professional cameras are discussed. Diopter correction was, as far as I know, introduced for the first time in this SLR. Loyal Pentax fan, E. J. Behr (UCSD, Math)