Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!infinity%udel-cc-vax2.delaware@udel-louie.ARPA From: infinity%udel-cc-vax2.delaware@udel-louie.ARPA Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: ETHER Message-ID: <339@sri-arpa.ARPA> Date: Sun, 7-Jul-85 00:38:38 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.339 Posted: Sun Jul 7 00:38:38 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 04:56:28 EDT Lines: 26 From: ALBERSOk, you obviously liked the last letter I sent (ha). Heres a more lunitic idea: (should be good for a laugh) How about if we say that a mass causes a curvature in the ETHER instead of a curvature in space? Then how bout we say that it isn't a curvature its a change in density. The closer to a mass the higher the density the farther away the lower the density. How about we say that this change in density can maybe cause light to be bent because the ETHER is of higher density than when not near the mass. How about we say that it is really this ETHER 'pressure' that holds us to the planet? How bout we say that time (process rate) is effected by a higher density of ETHER to the effect of causing time 'process rate' to slow? How about if I explained in the same easy way how matter and magnetism relate to ETHER in a clear and understandable way? Hmmm... lets see... light,gravity,magnetism,time,matter hmmm... sounds interesting. But anyway, where am I messing up? I find this an easier way to look at things than to think of space curving. Eric