Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekcrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!terryl
From: terryl@tekcrl.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Mad max
Message-ID: <179@tekcrl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Jun-85 04:21:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcrl.179
Posted: Thu Jun 27 04:21:41 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 28-Jun-85 01:33:35 EDT
References: <1202@utcsri.UUCP>
Lines: 16

>I managed to miss all the earlier Mel Gibson movies, but want to go back
>and "prepare" for the new one:

>Questions:	Is MAD MAX just a remake of Road Warrior?  I.e. is it important
>		to see Road Warrior first?
>
>		Is Road Warrior worth seeing even in the dubbed American
>		versions?  Is the original version available on videotape for
>		rental?  How can I tell the difference from the box?


      Your questions are all backwards. MAD MAX was made first, and it is the
movie with the dubbed American version. I don't know which version is on video-
tape(if any). You really don't need to see MAD MAX at all; the first two or
three minutes of ROAD WARRIOR has clips from MAD MAX that sums up MAD MAX
pretty much. But if you really want to see both, you should see MAD MAX first.