Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Meta-government
Message-ID: <22830@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 18:36:20 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.22830
Posted: Mon Mar  4 18:36:20 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Mar-85 09:48:14 EST
References: <656@unmvax.UUCP> <264@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <690@unmvax.UUCP> <347@psivax.UUCP> <715@unmvax.UUCP>
Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 16

> You seem to forget, or ignore, that the emmigration is allowed only if
> the receiving sub-meta-country accepts the criminal.  If a country wants
> to accept a mass-murder, that is up to the country to decide...personally
> I don't see why any country would do such a thing.

What do you do with the criminal that NO country accepts?  Libertaria
would be stuck with him since they don't pay taxes to support prison
systems and the Meta-government wont let you kill him.

> However, if a country
> wants to accept all the criminals who were caught in violation of an anti-
> drug law, then the accepting country has much to profit by this move.

Profit?  In what way?  Elaborate please.

J. Giles