Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!msb From: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.legal Subject: Re: info-law group Message-ID: <475@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 20:07:50 EST Article-I.D.: lsuc.475 Posted: Sun Mar 3 20:07:50 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Mar-85 20:22:51 EST References: <3069@allegra.UUCP> <1196@amdahl.UUCP> <450@lsuc.UUCP> <3104@allegra.UUCP> Reply-To: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 11 Summary: Okay, but do we have to call it fa.info-law? mp@allegra.UUCP (Mark Plotnick) writes: > While an automatic gateway would be easier on the usenet folk, the > problem is that net.legal's charter is much broader than that of > info-law@sri-csl... This makes sense, but the Arpaname is then misleading and the group may tend to attract inappropriate postings from this side. Is it necessary that the fa-name coincide with the Arpaname, or could we make it something like fa.cs-law? Mark Brader