Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!chris From: chris@scgvaxd.UUCP (Chris Yoder) Newsgroups: net.wanted,net.micro,net.lang Subject: Re: Information wanted for Alcyon. (VMS C compiler) Message-ID: <276@scgvaxd.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Mar-85 14:00:43 EST Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.276 Posted: Wed Mar 6 14:00:43 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Mar-85 07:41:24 EST References: <314@nmtvax.UUCP> <824@noscvax.UUCP> Reply-To: chris@scgvaxd.UUCP (Chris Yoder) Distribution: net Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA Lines: 27 Keywords: VMS C compiler Xref: utcs net.wanted:5874 net.micro:9223 net.lang:1466 Summary: >In article <314@nmtvax.UUCP> knight@nmtvax.UUCP writes: >> >>On a similar note, what about C compilers for VMS (preferably with an eye to >>compatibility with the compiler on the VME-10)? >> >>Thanks in advance, >> >>Bob Why not just use the DEC C compiler under VMS? It's got a built in library of UNIX-type routines, and when V 2.0 of the DEC compiler comes out you'll be able to use all of the features of the debugger! (All data structures aren't fully supported with the debuger yet...) Best of all, the DEC C compiler supports the VMS Language calling standard, so you can pass things around to routines written in other languages ('course *real* C studs might not find this a feature... :-) ) -- Chris Yoder UUCP --- scgvaxd!engvax!chris{ The opinions here are representative of Huge Aircrash, not me and *especially* not of my poor little keyboard. 8-)= }