Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 5/3/83; site ukc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!ncg From: ncg@ukc.UUCP (N.C.Gale) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Measure of success? Message-ID: <4943@ukc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 2-Mar-85 16:45:57 EST Article-I.D.: ukc.4943 Posted: Sat Mar 2 16:45:57 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 6-Mar-85 02:41:47 EST References: <257@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <761@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> <457@ssc-vax.UUCP> Reply-To: ncg@ukc.UUCP Organization: Computing Laboratory, U of Kent at Canterbury, UK Lines: 22 Summary: > >economic systems fail to measure the > >success of an economy by the ONE THING THAT REALLY MATTERS: the standard of > >living of those under the system. > > What I consider important is free time. I doubt if a man unemployed for three years would place the same emphasis on free time. If you have only just enough money to buy food, pay the rent, the heating bills etc, then what do you do with your surfeit of free time? It takes money to make proper use of free time. ^^^^^ It takes a job to make money. So those least able to use their free time, get the most. Such is western society. Ah, well. -Nigel Gale (resubscribed, God alone knows why)