Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site v1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!v1!josh From: josh@v1.UUCP (Josh Knight) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Re: Re: Re: IBM to support UNIX on 4300 Message-ID: <132@v1.UUCP> Date: Mon, 25-Feb-85 18:42:34 EST Article-I.D.: v1.132 Posted: Mon Feb 25 18:42:34 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Mar-85 02:50:06 EST References: <801@sdcsla.UUCP> <424@lsuc.UUCP> <990@watdcsu.UUCP> <170@cadtroy.UUCP> Organization: IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. Lines: 17 > It would be interesting to see if that standalone > UNIX could be forced out of the bowels of IBM. Why not try to force the 370 Unix described in the BLTJ October 1984 issue "out of the bowels of" AT&T? It claims to be "standalone", and (from the available public descriptions of both systems) appears to be very similar to what IX/370 would be "on the bare metal". One word of caution. Those who try to force things "out of the bowels of" other entities should watch where they stand (:-). Any opinions (stated or implied), errors (obvious or subtle), or other bad things are mine, not Big Blue's. Josh Knight, IBM T.J. Watson Research josh at YKTVMX on BITNET, josh.yktvmx.ibm on CSnet, ...!philabs!v1!josh