Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: Official Language Of USA
Message-ID: <707@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 13:05:24 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice5.707
Posted: Mon Mar  4 13:05:24 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Mar-85 11:39:33 EST
References: <168@nybcb.UUCP> <411@ssc-vax.UUCP> <682@ccice5.UUCP> <360@ccice6.UUCP> <692@ccice5.UUCP> <8280@watarts.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.politics:8017 net.flame:8724

>  
> BACK IT UP WITH SOMETHING! I LIVE UP HERE. BELIEVE ME IT WORKS.
> 
> 		DAVE BROWN

Easy, Dave, no offense intended!  I make the statement based on Canadian
friends (Ontarions and ex-Quebecois), your press (Toronto and Hamilton)
and our media.  The general feeling among these diverse sources is that
the bi-lingual system has caused many economic, administrative, social,
etc. problems.  I'm not saying it DOESN'T work, I'm just saying it doesn't
work WELL, at least not as well as if you all spoke one language.  And to
reassert my original argument, I don't see any need for us to do it here.

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***