Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Professor Wagstaff) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: "Let's go back to the old ways" Message-ID: <612@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 15:28:52 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.612 Posted: Sun Mar 3 15:28:52 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 08:27:27 EST References: <715@decwrl.UUCP> <587@pyuxd.UUCP> <590@pyuxd.UUCP> <3719@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: Huxley College Lines: 21 > Rather than start with the quotes, I have put them at the end, because they > are so lengthy. Essentially, what we have here are two extreme viewpoints: > > (A) Don Black: "The trouble with modern society is that the traditional > values have been rejected." > > (B) Rich Rosen: "The traditional values were wrong and should be utterly > rejected, even though this will inevitably result in some > societal distress." ["charley" WINGATE] And to think I accused you of twisting other people's words to suit your own needs. I'm so sorry. (Is a smiley really necessary >:-| !!!!!) If you need to know what it is I said, read my article, since "charley"'s summary is to the truth what junk food is to nutrition. I guess I should applaud your actually including the original quotes later in the article. But it doesn't serve as recompense for distorting what I said at the beginning of your article. Please compare "charley"'s distortion above to what I said in my original article. -- "Which three books would *you* have taken?" Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr