Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 2/2/84; site ltuxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!jmh From: jmh@ltuxa.UUCP (cecw 64lt503310-Jon Mcecw) Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey Subject: College Hockey and High School Pucks Message-ID: <295@ltuxa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 08:40:39 EST Article-I.D.: ltuxa.295 Posted: Mon Mar 4 08:40:39 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Mar-85 02:49:20 EST Organization: Corp Ed Cen AT&T Technologies - Lisle, Ill Lines: 28 In reference to Mike Ryan's scheduling idea - when you say "play each other 3 times" I don't know how well that would work out. To play home and home you would have to play everyone 4 times. It would be a big deal in the WCHA to fly out to say Denver to play 1 game,or for Colorado College to fly to Northern Michigan for one game. It would be nice to play everyone in the Division I, but I guess a little semi-controversy is good for the sport too. I sure wish I could watch a few games, but Chicagoland just doesn't go for college hockey I guess. Interesting phenomenon: On Saturday night a LOSING team scored the last goal in an overtime game. That doesn't happen too often I bet. I haven't seen the results from the weekend yet, but I hope the Badgers won. I think their only shot at the NCAA's is to win the playoffs. I still think Bowling Green got ripped off two years ago. High School Hockey: It's interesting to note that in Wisconsin a team with a record of lower than .500 is often (almost always) rated in the top ten in the state. That team is Superior (way up north) and it's because they play a schedule of Minnesota teams. Superior does VERY well against other Wisconsin teams. Keep on Puckin', Jon Hanrath ihnp4!ltuxa!jmh