Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!msb
From: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.legal
Subject: Re: info-law group
Message-ID: <475@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 20:07:50 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.475
Posted: Sun Mar  3 20:07:50 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Mar-85 20:22:51 EST
References: <3069@allegra.UUCP> <1196@amdahl.UUCP> <450@lsuc.UUCP> <3104@allegra.UUCP>
Reply-To: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader)
Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 11
Summary: Okay, but do we have to call it fa.info-law?

mp@allegra.UUCP (Mark Plotnick) writes:
> While an automatic gateway would be easier on the usenet folk, the
> problem is that net.legal's charter is much broader than that of
> info-law@sri-csl...

This makes sense, but the Arpaname is then misleading and the group
may tend to attract inappropriate postings from this side.  Is it
necessary that the fa-name coincide with the Arpaname, or could we
make it something like fa.cs-law?

Mark Brader