Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!gregbo
From: gregbo@houxm.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.followup
Subject: Re: Posting Correspondence
Message-ID: <1160@houxm.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 09:57:38 EST
Article-I.D.: houxm.1160
Posted: Sun Mar  3 09:57:38 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 20:14:45 EST
References: <257@unm-la.UUCP> <286@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <422@hercules.UUCP> <472@lsuc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.news:3218 net.followup:4587

> From: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader)

> He said, as I recall, that he felt justified in posting the email because
> he got it all from generally-readable files and because of the importance
> of the case ... and I'm inclined to agree with that too.  Your turn, I
> think, Tim.

So that means that if I find some unprotected correspondence about me that I can
feel free to post it to whomever I want?  Sorry, that doesn't cut it.  Just be-
cause it's not protected doesn't mean it is for public viewing.  If he thought
the evidence was so important, he should have taken some legal action against
UNC, but it was a definite mistake to post the correspondence.
-- 
			... hey, we've gotta get out of this place,
    			    there's got to be something better than this ...

Greg Skinner (gregbo)
{allegra,cbosgd,ihnp4}!houxm!gregbo
gregbo%houxm.uucp@harvard.arpa