Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 2/2/84; site ltuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!jmh
From: jmh@ltuxa.UUCP (cecw 64lt503310-Jon Mcecw)
Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey
Subject: College Hockey and High School Pucks
Message-ID: <295@ltuxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 08:40:39 EST
Article-I.D.: ltuxa.295
Posted: Mon Mar  4 08:40:39 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Mar-85 02:49:20 EST
Organization: Corp Ed Cen AT&T Technologies - Lisle, Ill
Lines: 28

In reference to Mike Ryan's scheduling idea - when you say "play
each other 3 times" I don't know how well that would work out.  To
play home and home you would have to play everyone 4 times.  It
would be a big deal in the WCHA to fly out to say Denver to play
1 game,or for Colorado College to fly to Northern Michigan for one game.
It would be nice to play everyone in the Division I, but I guess a 
little semi-controversy is good for the sport too.

I sure wish I could watch a few games, but Chicagoland just doesn't
go for college hockey I guess.

Interesting phenomenon: On Saturday night a LOSING team scored the
last goal in an overtime game.  That doesn't happen too often I bet.

I haven't seen the results from the weekend yet, but I hope the Badgers
won.  I think their only shot at the NCAA's is to win the playoffs.

I still think Bowling Green got ripped off two years ago.

High School Hockey: It's interesting to note that in Wisconsin
a team with a record of lower than .500 is often (almost always)
rated in the top ten in the state.  That team is Superior (way up
north) and it's because they play a schedule of Minnesota teams.
Superior does VERY well against other Wisconsin teams.

Keep on Puckin',
Jon Hanrath
ihnp4!ltuxa!jmh