Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!ethan
From: ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Balanced Treatment Evolution/Creation
Message-ID: <1051@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 12:10:53 EST
Article-I.D.: utastro.1051
Posted: Fri Mar  1 12:10:53 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 06:23:40 EST
References: <187@iwu1d.UUCP> <272@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 24

> In article <187@iwu1d.UUCP> tan@iwu1d.UUCP (William Tanenbaum) writes:
> >A. Ray Miller is of course correct that biology textbooks should
> >present all the SCIENTIFIC arguments for creationism along with those
> >for evolution.   But, they already do.  What do you think the blank
> >page before the title page is for?
> 
> What an incredibly intellectual comment! Obviously you know absolutely
> nothing about origins or are incredibly biased!
> 
> 				      Dan

I agree with Bill Jefferys on this one, but why not make this more 
entertaining.  Since you know that anyone who agrees with the above 
comment is unbearably prejudiced or ignorant, you must surely have some 
strong scientific arguments for creationism in mind.  I haven't seen any 
in this newsgroup to date, so I'm naturally curious as to what they are.

"Don't argue with a fool.      Ethan Vishniac
 Borrow his money."            {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan
                               Department of Astronomy
                               University of Texas
                               Austin, Texas 78712

*Anyone who wants to claim these opinions is welcome to them*