Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site t12tst.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!t12tst!chip
From: chip@t12tst.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: the answer to the net.sources garbage
Message-ID: <276@t12tst.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Mar-85 23:58:32 EST
Article-I.D.: t12tst.276
Posted: Thu Mar  7 23:58:32 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Mar-85 07:18:01 EST
References: <1356@t4test.UUCP>
Reply-To: chip@t12tst.UUCP
Distribution: net
Organization: Intel Microprocessor Mfg, Santa Clara
Lines: 21
Summary: the votes are coming in

~| From: chip@t4test.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal)
~| Date: 3 Mar 85 07:40:14 GMT
~| 
~| I just got caught up on all the stuff which came into net.sources.  Boy, it
~| sure is a lot of crap!  Well, then allow me to propose *the solution* to
~| the net.sources problem.  Why not use a moderated newsgroup for sources?

I've received over a dozen responses to the above message.  I will summarize
them and issue a followup next week.  If you have any concerns on this issue,
please drop me a line.  Even if it is simply to say "yes" or "no".

The responses so far are overwhelmingly in favor of a high-quality
mod.sources.  If you take a moment to send me your comments, maybe we can
build a consensus on this.

Thanks to those of you who have written.

-- 

Chip Rosenthal, Intel/Santa Clara, (408) 496-7651
{cbosgd,idi,intelca,icalqa,kremvax,qubix} ! {t4test,t12tst} ! {chip,news}