Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg From: jlg@lanl.ARPA Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Next generation Message-ID: <22824@lanl.ARPA> Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 18:04:24 EST Article-I.D.: lanl.22824 Posted: Mon Mar 4 18:04:24 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 8-Mar-85 04:04:40 EST References: <487@whuxl.UUCP> <1407@ut-ngp.UUCP> Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA Distribution: net Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 12 > I'm not a [Ll]ibertarian, per se, but I still disagree with the idea > that I have a "*duty*" to care for the next generation. Why is it > my duty to maintain the continuity of the species? > > Ken Montgomery "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs" This is where evolution takes a hand. Those who share the above view are unlikely to have supporters among the next generation. One presumes that Ken Montgomery's parents didn't have this bias either, so Ken must be an unsuccessful mutation in this generation. J. Giles