Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekecs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!pesnta!hplabs!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP (Jeff Winslow) Newsgroups: net.news,net.followup Subject: Re: net overload-- comments and suggestions Message-ID: <5174@tekecs.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Mar-85 12:32:38 EST Article-I.D.: tekecs.5174 Posted: Thu Mar 7 12:32:38 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Mar-85 05:27:51 EST References: <2404@nsc.UUCP> <3429@alice.UUCP>, <5160@tekecs.UUCP> <3438@alice.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 20 Xref: watmath net.news:3258 net.followup:4618 > Jeff Winslow suggests that the reason for my perception of the > net's SNR going to 0 might be based on my presumed interest > in various subjects, an effective ad-hominem attack if I ever > saw one..."Suggests" is a good description of my intent, "attack" is not. I apologize if my intent was not put effectively into practice. Must every question regarding someone else's perceptions be referred to as an "ad-hominem attack"? If so, I think the term loses some of its meaning. > I respectively submit that contending a problem does not exist on the > current net is analogous to digging a hole in the sand below > high tide and burying one's head. As I said, "(there) may be a technical or political problem, ..." yours in moderation (did I say that?), Jeff Winslow