Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!prophet From: prophet@umcp-cs.UUCP (Dennis Gibbs) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Wanted: Cassette Deck advice Message-ID: <3753@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 16:20:34 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3753 Posted: Fri Mar 1 16:20:34 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 07:43:46 EST Distribution: net Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 25 <> From Shaun Simpkins: >I would suggest looking at the Nak BX-300 before you run out and purchase >the LX-3 - I think the BX-300 gives more value for the same list price. >It is a 2-capstan design, hence low flutter, hence much better reproduction of >things like piano, oboe, massed strings, etc. The LX-3 is a single capstan >design 3 to 4 years old and I suspect Nak is clearing them out. To my tastes >the BX-300 is less gaudy than the LX-3. B&O does a better job at high sex >design than Nak (High Sex Design = faceless aluminum sheet with wood trim that >does something audioish). Wrong. The Nakamichi LX-3 is a dual-capstan machine with two heads. Dennis -- Call-Me: Dennis Gibbs, Univ. of Md. Comp. Sci. Center. UUCP: {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!prophet CSNet: prophet@umcp-cs BITNET: GIBBS@UMDB ARPA: prophet@Maryland