Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Next generation
Message-ID: <22824@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 18:04:24 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.22824
Posted: Mon Mar  4 18:04:24 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Mar-85 04:04:40 EST
References: <487@whuxl.UUCP> <1407@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA
Distribution: net
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 12

> I'm not a [Ll]ibertarian, per se, but I still disagree with the idea
> that I have a "*duty*" to care for the next generation.  Why is it
> my duty to maintain the continuity of the species?
> 
> Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"

This is where evolution takes a hand.  Those who share the above view are
unlikely to have supporters among the next generation.  One presumes that
Ken Montgomery's parents didn't have this bias either, so Ken must be
an unsuccessful mutation in this generation.

J. Giles