Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh
From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian,net.religion
Subject: Re: Supposed claims to be the ONE TRUE CHURCH
Message-ID: <385@cybvax0.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 13:22:08 EST
Article-I.D.: cybvax0.385
Posted: Fri Mar  1 13:22:08 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 06:16:57 EST
References: <193@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <346@teklds.UUCP> <340@cadre.ARPA> <373@teklds.UUCP>
Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.religion.christian:347 net.religion:5830
Summary: 

In article <373@teklds.UUCP> larryg@teklds.UUCP (Karen Clark) writes:
> How can God be consistent and say that everyone will be saved?

What would be inconsistent about it?  Gawd didn't have
to set up this saved/damned system in the first place.

> He hasn't made it difficult to be "born again".  The criteria
> for being saved is simply following Jesus.  Either you do or
> you don't.  He certainly can't say, well we will let them
> in anyway even if they don't follow whay I say.

What about the billions who never had the opportunity to be "born again"?
Because they never heard of JC?  It was difficult for them.

> I wouldn't
> want to follow a wishy washy God like that!

Ah, you want a macho god who smites, burns, damns, etc.

Well, I certainly wouldn't want to follow a nasty god like the one 
you believe in.
-- 

Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh