Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Professor Wagstaff)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: "Let's go back to the old ways"
Message-ID: <612@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 15:28:52 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.612
Posted: Sun Mar  3 15:28:52 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 08:27:27 EST
References: <715@decwrl.UUCP> <587@pyuxd.UUCP> <590@pyuxd.UUCP> <3719@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Huxley College
Lines: 21

> Rather than start with the quotes, I have put them at the end, because they
> are so lengthy.  Essentially, what we have here are two extreme viewpoints:
> 
>   (A) Don Black: "The trouble with modern society is that the traditional
>                  values have been rejected."
> 
>   (B) Rich Rosen: "The traditional values were wrong and should be utterly
>                   rejected, even though this will inevitably result in some
>                   societal distress."  ["charley" WINGATE]

And to think I accused you of twisting other people's words to suit your
own needs.  I'm so sorry.  (Is a smiley really necessary   >:-| !!!!!)
If you need to know what it is I said, read my article, since "charley"'s
summary is to the truth what junk food is to nutrition.  I guess I should
applaud your actually including the original quotes later in the article.
But it doesn't serve as recompense for distorting what I said at the
beginning of your article.  Please compare "charley"'s distortion above to
what I said in my original article.
-- 
"Which three books would *you* have taken?"
				Rich Rosen	ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr