Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!ethan From: ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Balanced Treatment Evolution/Creation Message-ID: <1051@utastro.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 12:10:53 EST Article-I.D.: utastro.1051 Posted: Fri Mar 1 12:10:53 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 06:23:40 EST References: <187@iwu1d.UUCP> <272@scgvaxd.UUCP> Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX Lines: 24 > In article <187@iwu1d.UUCP> tan@iwu1d.UUCP (William Tanenbaum) writes: > >A. Ray Miller is of course correct that biology textbooks should > >present all the SCIENTIFIC arguments for creationism along with those > >for evolution. But, they already do. What do you think the blank > >page before the title page is for? > > What an incredibly intellectual comment! Obviously you know absolutely > nothing about origins or are incredibly biased! > > Dan I agree with Bill Jefferys on this one, but why not make this more entertaining. Since you know that anyone who agrees with the above comment is unbearably prejudiced or ignorant, you must surely have some strong scientific arguments for creationism in mind. I haven't seen any in this newsgroup to date, so I'm naturally curious as to what they are. "Don't argue with a fool. Ethan Vishniac Borrow his money." {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan Department of Astronomy University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 *Anyone who wants to claim these opinions is welcome to them*