Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site t12tst.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!t12tst!chip From: chip@t12tst.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: the answer to the net.sources garbage Message-ID: <276@t12tst.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Mar-85 23:58:32 EST Article-I.D.: t12tst.276 Posted: Thu Mar 7 23:58:32 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Mar-85 07:18:01 EST References: <1356@t4test.UUCP> Reply-To: chip@t12tst.UUCP Distribution: net Organization: Intel Microprocessor Mfg, Santa Clara Lines: 21 Summary: the votes are coming in ~| From: chip@t4test.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal) ~| Date: 3 Mar 85 07:40:14 GMT ~| ~| I just got caught up on all the stuff which came into net.sources. Boy, it ~| sure is a lot of crap! Well, then allow me to propose *the solution* to ~| the net.sources problem. Why not use a moderated newsgroup for sources? I've received over a dozen responses to the above message. I will summarize them and issue a followup next week. If you have any concerns on this issue, please drop me a line. Even if it is simply to say "yes" or "no". The responses so far are overwhelmingly in favor of a high-quality mod.sources. If you take a moment to send me your comments, maybe we can build a consensus on this. Thanks to those of you who have written. -- Chip Rosenthal, Intel/Santa Clara, (408) 496-7651 {cbosgd,idi,intelca,icalqa,kremvax,qubix} ! {t4test,t12tst} ! {chip,news}