Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!godot!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Bill Peter Message-ID: <394@cybvax0.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Mar-85 14:41:13 EST Article-I.D.: cybvax0.394 Posted: Wed Mar 6 14:41:13 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Mar-85 20:12:04 EST References: <229@cmu-cs-gandalf.ARPA> <262@unm-la.UUCP> Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA Lines: 21 Summary: In article <262@unm-la.UUCP> cs193aae@unm-la.UUCP writes: > When you get out of elementary school and learn to read properly, maybe > then we can have a discussion. But I see no purpose in wasting time > with you if you're going to liken my philosophical views to those held > by people in the ICR and Moral Majority. > > When you retire from your mind-reading career and write a book > about your exploits, I hope you mention how you deduced from so > short a posting the true extent of my beliefs in a deity. If you > can read my mind now, I hope you take my advice and jump into the > Monongahela river. Here I see nothing but two kinds of fallacies of argument: ad hominem attacks and the stand on dignity. The previous note employed ridicule, which is also a fallacy, but it did mention several valid points which this note fails to address. Can we see some real response, please? -- Mike Huybensz ...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh