Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!utah-cs!shebs
From: shebs@utah-cs.UUCP (Stanley Shebs)
Newsgroups: net.ai,net.lang.lisp,net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Thus spake the DoD...
Message-ID: <3226@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 14:00:59 EST
Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3226
Posted: Fri Mar  1 14:00:59 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Mar-85 03:45:36 EST
References: <417@ssc-vax.UUCP> <676@topaz.ARPA> <6982@watdaisy.UUCP> <3223@utah-cs.UUCP> <76@daisy.UUCP>
Reply-To: shebs@utah-cs.UUCP (Stanley shebs)
Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.ai:2568 net.lang.lisp:347 net.lang.ada:199
Summary: 

In article <76@daisy.UUCP> david@daisy.UUCP (David Schachter) writes:
>
>Mr. Shebs asks for one thing that Pascal or Ada do better than Lisp.  One
>thing is that Pascal runs on the IBM  PC and other low-end, cheap, widely
>available hardware platforms.  If you want other people to buy your programs,
>this is can be an important thing.  Lisp has a reputation for not running well
>on small cheap boxes.  If this reputation is deserved, then Pascal is a better
>choice for some applications.  (Elegance isn't everything.  Profitability
>counts too.)

Our Lisp dialect PSL runs on 128K Macintoshes and is used by freshmen here.
However, it *does* use the entire available space and leaves only a very
small heap!  Harold Carr recently showed how to make compiled Lisp programs
work outside of a large environment - it hasn't been done in the past
because nobody was interested in exchanging a comfortable and sophisticated
environment for the crude and primitive ones usually associated with
C and Pascal (Un*x notwithstanding).

							stan shebs