Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxm.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!gregbo From: gregbo@houxm.UUCP (Greg Skinner) Newsgroups: net.news,net.followup Subject: Re: Posting Correspondence Message-ID: <1160@houxm.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Mar-85 09:57:38 EST Article-I.D.: houxm.1160 Posted: Sun Mar 3 09:57:38 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 20:14:45 EST References: <257@unm-la.UUCP> <286@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <422@hercules.UUCP> <472@lsuc.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 19 Xref: watmath net.news:3218 net.followup:4587 > From: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) > He said, as I recall, that he felt justified in posting the email because > he got it all from generally-readable files and because of the importance > of the case ... and I'm inclined to agree with that too. Your turn, I > think, Tim. So that means that if I find some unprotected correspondence about me that I can feel free to post it to whomever I want? Sorry, that doesn't cut it. Just be- cause it's not protected doesn't mean it is for public viewing. If he thought the evidence was so important, he should have taken some legal action against UNC, but it was a definite mistake to post the correspondence. -- ... hey, we've gotta get out of this place, there's got to be something better than this ... Greg Skinner (gregbo) {allegra,cbosgd,ihnp4}!houxm!gregbo gregbo%houxm.uucp@harvard.arpa