Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!chris
From: chris@scgvaxd.UUCP (Chris Yoder)
Newsgroups: net.wanted,net.micro,net.lang
Subject: Re: Information wanted for Alcyon. (VMS C compiler)
Message-ID: <276@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Mar-85 14:00:43 EST
Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.276
Posted: Wed Mar  6 14:00:43 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Mar-85 07:41:24 EST
References: <314@nmtvax.UUCP> <824@noscvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: chris@scgvaxd.UUCP (Chris Yoder)
Distribution: net
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 27
Keywords: VMS C compiler
Xref: utcs net.wanted:5874 net.micro:9223 net.lang:1466
Summary: 

>In article <314@nmtvax.UUCP> knight@nmtvax.UUCP writes:
>>
>>On a similar note, what about C compilers for VMS (preferably with an eye to
>>compatibility with the compiler on the VME-10)?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Bob

     Why not just use the DEC C compiler under VMS?  It's got a built in
library of UNIX-type routines, and when V 2.0 of the DEC compiler comes out
you'll be able to use all of the features of the debugger!  (All data
structures aren't fully supported with the debuger yet...)  Best of all, the
DEC C compiler supports the VMS Language calling standard, so you can pass
things around to routines written in other languages ('course *real* C studs
might not find this a feature... :-) )

				-- Chris Yoder

UUCP --- scgvaxd!engvax!chris



{  The opinions here are representative of Huge Aircrash, not me and 
   *especially* not of my poor little keyboard.    8-)=
}