Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Newsgroups: net.religion.christian,net.religion Subject: Re: Supposed claims to be the ONE TRUE CHURCH Message-ID: <385@cybvax0.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 13:22:08 EST Article-I.D.: cybvax0.385 Posted: Fri Mar 1 13:22:08 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 06:16:57 EST References: <193@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <346@teklds.UUCP> <340@cadre.ARPA> <373@teklds.UUCP> Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA Lines: 24 Xref: watmath net.religion.christian:347 net.religion:5830 Summary: In article <373@teklds.UUCP> larryg@teklds.UUCP (Karen Clark) writes: > How can God be consistent and say that everyone will be saved? What would be inconsistent about it? Gawd didn't have to set up this saved/damned system in the first place. > He hasn't made it difficult to be "born again". The criteria > for being saved is simply following Jesus. Either you do or > you don't. He certainly can't say, well we will let them > in anyway even if they don't follow whay I say. What about the billions who never had the opportunity to be "born again"? Because they never heard of JC? It was difficult for them. > I wouldn't > want to follow a wishy washy God like that! Ah, you want a macho god who smites, burns, damns, etc. Well, I certainly wouldn't want to follow a nasty god like the one you believe in. -- Mike Huybensz ...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh