Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!tekig1!gregr
From: gregr@tekig1.UUCP (Greg Rogers)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: How to evaluate speakers
Message-ID: <1845@tekig1.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Feb-85 02:11:54 EST
Article-I.D.: tekig1.1845
Posted: Wed Feb 27 02:11:54 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 05:02:39 EST
References: <967@ihuxn.UUCP>
Reply-To: gregr@tekig1.UUCP (Greg Rogers)
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 24
Summary: 


> By the way, when you listen to a system, did you know that having
> another set of speakers (just setting there not playing anything)
> in the room makes it impossible to evaluate anything.  The passive
> speakers  vibrate in response to the sound being produced and
> pollute the sound being produced, no matter how good the system
> being evaluated is.  

Oh no! Not this again!  Are we going to rehash the whole 4" speaker
in the cassette deck argument again?  Please lets not start this 
debate again.  Just to show you how much I want to bury this discussion
I won't even bother to share the pages of technical arguments that 
were presented last time.  Nor will I even state which side they were
on.  Nor will I state which side I'm on.  I think this was the argument
that finally discourged me so much I quit participating in the net for
months.  Irony, I'm so upset thinking about this I'm back to posting 
to the net again.  Stop! Please Stop!  I think my sanity may be at stake
here.  I'll go to bed now, and when I awake maybe it will just be a
bad dream.....
		Searching for my tongue somewhere near my cheek,

				Greg Rogers
				Tektronix