Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!prophet
From: prophet@umcp-cs.UUCP (Dennis Gibbs)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Wanted: Cassette Deck advice
Message-ID: <3753@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Mar-85 16:20:34 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3753
Posted: Fri Mar  1 16:20:34 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 4-Mar-85 07:43:46 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 25


<>

From Shaun Simpkins:


>I would suggest looking at the Nak BX-300 before you run out and purchase
>the LX-3 - I think the BX-300 gives more value for the same list price.
>It is a 2-capstan design, hence low flutter, hence much better reproduction of
>things like piano, oboe, massed strings, etc.  The LX-3 is a single capstan
>design 3 to 4 years old and I suspect Nak is clearing them out.  To my tastes
>the BX-300 is less gaudy than the LX-3.  B&O does a better job at high sex
>design than Nak (High Sex Design = faceless aluminum sheet with wood trim that
>does something audioish).

Wrong.  The Nakamichi LX-3 is a dual-capstan machine with two heads.

                                Dennis

-- 
Call-Me:   Dennis Gibbs, Univ. of Md. Comp. Sci. Center.
UUCP:	   {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!prophet
CSNet:	   prophet@umcp-cs
BITNET:    GIBBS@UMDB
ARPA:	   prophet@Maryland