Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!jlg From: jlg@lanl.ARPA Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Meta-government Message-ID: <22830@lanl.ARPA> Date: Mon, 4-Mar-85 18:36:20 EST Article-I.D.: lanl.22830 Posted: Mon Mar 4 18:36:20 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Mar-85 09:48:14 EST References: <656@unmvax.UUCP> <264@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> <690@unmvax.UUCP> <347@psivax.UUCP> <715@unmvax.UUCP> Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 16 > You seem to forget, or ignore, that the emmigration is allowed only if > the receiving sub-meta-country accepts the criminal. If a country wants > to accept a mass-murder, that is up to the country to decide...personally > I don't see why any country would do such a thing. What do you do with the criminal that NO country accepts? Libertaria would be stuck with him since they don't pay taxes to support prison systems and the Meta-government wont let you kill him. > However, if a country > wants to accept all the criminals who were caught in violation of an anti- > drug law, then the accepting country has much to profit by this move. Profit? In what way? Elaborate please. J. Giles