Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!godot!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh
From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Bill Peter
Message-ID: <394@cybvax0.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Mar-85 14:41:13 EST
Article-I.D.: cybvax0.394
Posted: Wed Mar  6 14:41:13 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Mar-85 20:12:04 EST
References: <229@cmu-cs-gandalf.ARPA> <262@unm-la.UUCP>
Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <262@unm-la.UUCP> cs193aae@unm-la.UUCP writes:
> When you get out of elementary school and learn to read properly, maybe
> then we can have a discussion.  But I see no purpose in wasting time
> with you if you're going to liken my philosophical views to those held
> by people in the ICR and Moral Majority.
> 
> When you retire from your mind-reading career and write a book
> about your exploits, I hope you mention how you deduced from so
> short a posting the true extent of my beliefs in a deity.  If you
> can read my mind now, I hope you take my advice and jump into the
> Monongahela river.

Here I see nothing but two kinds of fallacies of argument: ad hominem
attacks and the stand on dignity.

The previous note employed ridicule, which is also a fallacy, but it did
mention several valid points which this note fails to address.  Can
we see some real response, please?
-- 

Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh