Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ho95b.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!ho95b!ran
From: ran@ho95b.UUCP (RANeinast)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: flood and Bible
Message-ID: <288@ho95b.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 11:10:57 EST
Article-I.D.: ho95b.288
Posted: Fri Jan  4 11:10:57 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Jan-85 02:48:48 EST
Organization: AT&T-Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 31



>Marcel gets into a discussion of the Bible.  I guess he is trying to
>fit it into todays thinking.  
>
>What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended
>to be.  According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of
>God.  That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books.
>Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean
>we are right and He is wrong.  Perspective is a powerful thing.
>
>karen alias larryg


This posting is the literal word of God, and I created the universe
in a Big Bang and let it evolve.

There, this writing is now also set apart from all other writings
or books (because, by according to this writing itself, it is the
literal word of God).  Just because I don't fit into YOUR way of
thinking doesn't mean you are right and I am wrong.

Same "logic" as karen.

God
(as transmitted by),
-- 

". . . and shun the frumious Bandersnatch."
       Robert Neinast (ihnp4!ho95b!ran)
       AT&T-Bell Labs