Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site akgua.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!edb
From: edb@akgua.UUCP (E.D. Brooks [Emily])
Newsgroups: net.books,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ...
Message-ID: <1183@akgua.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 10:18:15 EST
Article-I.D.: akgua.1183
Posted: Thu Jan 10 10:18:15 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:10:57 EST
References: <243@looking.UUCP>, <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Technologies/Bell Labs, Atlanta
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.books:1200 net.women:4044

Re:
>How many wives/girlfriends feel OK about their husbands/boyfriends
>reading this stuff?
>
>Paul Dubuc	cbscc!pmd

Personally, I have never cared one whit what my husband
reads/thinks/fantasizes - his mind is his own.  It is the way he
treats me that is important.  And THAT is just fine!

If pornography is degrading, then I agree with whoever it was that
stated that it is our societal ATTITUDE toward sex that promotes this
"degradation" not an innate property of pornography.

Emily Brooks	akgua!edb