Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Discussion vs. Convincing Message-ID: <296@ccice6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 11:34:12 EST Article-I.D.: ccice6.296 Posted: Thu Jan 17 11:34:12 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 01:26:30 EST References: <217@decwrl.UUCP> <4882@fortune.UUCP> Organization: The Wall Of Fog Lines: 14 > > 2. Bombing abortion clinics (provided no one get hurt) is merely property > > destruction. I wonder if Hitler had put his camps in the city if they > > would not have been bombed also. That's why they were remote. If on > > a jury, I would never convict an abortion clinic bomber as I feel he > > is going to the aid of the defensless. > > Maybe somebody should bomb your house while nobody is home, would you feel > that it is "only property destruction"? > Your analogy is incorrect. The abortion clinic is the property of rational thinking people. -- The Last Surviving Bronto