Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site plus5.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!plus5!hokey From: hokey@plus5.UUCP (Hokey) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Standard for union initialization? Message-ID: <553@plus5.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 00:18:39 EST Article-I.D.: plus5.553 Posted: Tue Jan 15 00:18:39 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 15-Jan-85 07:29:07 EST References: <6995@brl-tgr.ARPA> <7004@brl-tgr.ARPA> <6847@watdaisy.UUCP> <10884@watmath.UUCP> Organization: Plus Five Computer Services, St. Louis Lines: 13 For starters, I hope people have been reading the discusison pertaining to union initialization in mod.std.c. After reading the note in mod.std.c from the Chair of the C Standards Committee, however, I don't know if the discussion is good for anything; he said the Committee decided on the "first element" rule and the issue is closed. I would *love* to see enough feedback on the issue to cause the Committee to change their position. Now, if only the Unix standards group would consider changing lockf()... -- Hokey ..ihnp4!plus5!hokey 314-725-9492