Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!mcvax!boring!steven
From: steven@boring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Pascal vs. C
Message-ID: <6283@boring.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Jan-85 12:14:09 EST
Article-I.D.: boring.6283
Posted: Mon Jan 14 12:14:09 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 10:12:53 EST
References: <4859@utzoo.UUCP> <11@mit-athena.ARPA> <177@gcc-opus.ARPA> <7055@brl-tgr.ARPA> <25@seismo.UUCP>
Reply-To: steven@boring.UUCP (Steven Pemberton)
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 10
Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL

In article <25@seismo.UUCP> keith@seismo.UUCP (Keith Bostic) writes:
> Come on -- let's not start a PASCAL vs. C debate, okay?
Quite. But then why say more?

> Pascal in its standard form is simply not useable for anything except cute
> little application programs.
I'm not the world's greatest Pascal fan, but this is just not true! I've
seen many large useful programs written in standard Pascal, and written well.

Steven Pemberton, CWI, Amsterdam.