Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!emjej
From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Re: Gender-specific responses to s/h
Message-ID: <4500009@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 16:25:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uokvax.4500009
Posted: Tue Jan 15 16:25:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 02:32:47 EST
References: <200@topaz.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:topaz:-20000:uokvax:4500009:000:746
Nf-From: uokvax!emjej    Jan 15 15:25:00 1985

/***** uokvax:net.nlang / topaz!josh /  4:06 pm  Jan  9, 1985 */
There's a precedent for the plural form of a pronoun taking over the 
singular--the second person, "you".  One says "you are" even when speaking
of (to) a single person.  The original singular form "thou" has largely
disappeared.

--JoSH
/* ---------- */

"You" and corresponding formal pronouns in Romance languages are hangovers
from humoring people who use the royal "we" by using plural constructs to
refer to them. It's not clear whether that should justify adding ambiguity
to English.

						James Jones

(On the other hand, whenever I hear "Everybody should bring his hat," I
picture a mob ripping a particular fedora to shreds, all of them trying
to grab the same hat...)