Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site klipper.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!mcvax!vu44!botter!klipper!biep From: biep@klipper.UUCP (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Split Politics in 3 Message-ID: <414@klipper.UUCP> Date: Wed, 16-Jan-85 11:56:54 EST Article-I.D.: klipper.414 Posted: Wed Jan 16 11:56:54 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 03:24:51 EST References: <1038@aecom.UUCP> <225@lsuc.UUCP> <1079@aecom.UUCP> <267@lsuc.UUCP> <2237@randvax.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: VU Informatica, Amsterdam Lines: 21 Xref: watmath net.news.group:2780 net.politics:6935 [] I propose: net.politics.isms (or .theory), net.politics.nat (or .dom), for local (not international) politics (in any country!!), and net.politics.int (or .world), for international politics. I prefer ".int" to ".world", for a war between two minor countries isn't quite a world politics affair. All articles transcending this tripartition should be posted to (and only be posted to!) net.politics. Giving an example from real life should not form a reason to post an article from net.politics.isms in any of the other three groups. -- Biep. {seismo|decvax|philabs}!mcvax!vu44!botter!klipper!biep I utterly disagree with everything you are saying, but I am prepared to fight to the death for your right to say it. --Voltaire