Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site eisx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!spuxll!eisx!jtb From: jtb@eisx.UUCP (J. Burgess) Newsgroups: net.news.adm Subject: Is this sys file entry OK? Message-ID: <846@eisx.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 17:48:00 EST Article-I.D.: eisx.846 Posted: Thu Jan 10 17:48:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:03:33 EST Organization: AT&T Info. Sys. Labs, South Plainfield NJ Lines: 24 I currently run 2.10.1 news (with the intention of converting to 2.10.2 1) when the bug reports stop, and 2) when somebody can then send me source with all the proper fixes in it! and now back to our story) I just went through most of the discussion of sys file entries, distributions and such. Now, can anybody tell me if this entry from my sys file is OK in 2.10.2? It works fine in 2.10! spuxll:all,!l,!to,to.spuxll:F:/usr/spool/batch/spuxll Obviously, I'm only interested in critiques on field 2. By the way, the '!l' is intended to prevent distribution of our "local" groups - l.all. John Burgess -- John Burgess ATT-IS (CP LOB) Labs, So. Plainfield NJ (HP 1C-221) uucp: {most AT&T machines}!eisx!jtb phone: (201) 561-7100 x2481