Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site desint.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!desint!geoff From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: Re: When radar detectors are illegal! Message-ID: <307@desint.UUCP> Date: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:48:43 EST Article-I.D.: desint.307 Posted: Sat Jan 12 06:48:43 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 15-Jan-85 01:16:34 EST References: <448@mhuxt.UUCP> <193@panda.UUCP> <258@enmasse.UUCP> <11551@gatech.UUCP> <603@aluxe.UUCP> Organization: his home computer, Manhattan Beach, CA Lines: 16 In article <603@aluxe.UUCP> 2141smh@aluxe.UUCP (henning) writes: >The laws and State Police are really on our side. Usually, that is. You apparently haven't run into some of the state cops I've met (Massachusetts, for instance). As for laws, I remember bringing in the New Year in 1977 with a prolonged sex session. Hardly a new idea, but it was a special occasion because everything we did was legal in California for the first time. Was it really being "on our side" to prohibit sex in every position except "missionary?" For that matter, is it really being "on our side" to subsidize and protect (with import tariffs) the liquor and tobacco industries? -- Geoff Kuenning ...!ihnp4!trwrb!desint!geoff