Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.religion
Subject: Re: Arndt replies to the "scholarly quote" (guaranteed laughs for all)
Message-ID: <360@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 8-Jan-85 12:01:11 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.360
Posted: Tue Jan  8 12:01:11 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jan-85 06:16:41 EST
References: <106@decwrl.UUCP> <350@pyuxd.UUCP> <752@sjuvax.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.flame:7521 net.religion:5239

> Since this discussion (loosely) deals with quotation, I would like to
> point out an incomplete quotation on the part of Rich Rosen.
> 
>>BRIAN: "No, you've got it all wrong!  You don't have to follow me!  You don't
>>        have to follow ANYONE!  You've got to think for yourselves! You are
>>    	  all individuals!"
>>CROWD: "YES, WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS!"			Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr
> 
> Actually, there is another important part to this -
> 
> (SMALL VOICE IN THE CROWD) : I'm not!
> 				Binayak Banerjee
> 		{allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!bbanerje

Actually, the part after "YES, WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS!" goes like this:
-- 
BRIAN:  "You're all different!"
CROWD:  "YES, WE'RE ALL DIFFERENT!"			Rich Rosen
MAN:    "I'm not ... "			     {ihnp4 | harpo}!pyuxd!rlr