Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Libertarianism & basketball
Message-ID: <1181@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 18:13:54 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1181
Posted: Fri Jan 11 18:13:54 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 14-Jan-85 00:51:55 EST
References: <272@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <648@bunker.UUCP> <420@whuxl.UUCP>
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 16

>the Indians had no concept that you could restrict another's liberty
>to use or roam the land by claiming something called "ownership".
>Why should ANYONE be able to claim they own the land?
>  tim sevener    whuxl!orb

By that logic, Mr. Sevener, how can *you* claim to own the
clothes that you are (presumably :-)) wearing?  After all,
that claim restricts the freedom of others to wear them...

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]