Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uok.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!mpackard From: mpackard@uok.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm Subject: XMDM-102.ASM Bug? Message-ID: <4800006@uok.UUCP> Date: Mon, 31-Dec-84 17:20:00 EST Article-I.D.: uok.4800006 Posted: Mon Dec 31 17:20:00 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Jan-85 01:35:22 EST Lines: 13 Nf-ID: #N:uok:4800006:000:617 Nf-From: uok!mpackard Dec 31 16:20:00 1984 [] I've been writing on an xmodem protocal in 'C' (to make it more portable for me) and have been using XMDM-102.ASM as the referance. I've looked at other 'C' programs already written but most of them make an error in the protocal or are as obese as the assembler code. That is they send a 16 bit record number, rather than the proper 8 bits. I suspect that they were never tested. Also while looking at the code I noticed a bug in the WRBLOCK routine at WRERR. It says MVI C,CAN, and should say MVI A,CAN. I don't know if anyone in this group keeps track of reports, but thought I might pass it on. uok!mpackard