Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!simone From: simone@lsuc.UUCP (Simone Sherman) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: re social security Message-ID: <283@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 12:33:46 EST Article-I.D.: lsuc.283 Posted: Fri Jan 11 12:33:46 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 11-Jan-85 14:11:20 EST References: <804@hound.UUCP> Reply-To: simone@lsuc.UUCP (Simone Sherman) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 16 In article <804@hound.UUCP> 551rcg@hound.UUCP (R.GANNS) writes: ||Does anyone out there have any facts about what percentage of total ||social security revenues goes to overhead vs how much actually gets ||paid out to recipients? I suspect that the difficulty of dismantling ||SS would be proportional to the size of the fraction going to support ||the administrative bureaucracy. But once you dismantled social security you'd start reaping benefits which would continue indefinitely (or until it was started up again :-) ). Simone Sherman -- {utzoo pesnta nrcaero utcs}!lsuc!simone {allegra decvax ihnp4 linus}!utcsrgv!lsuc!simone