Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site ittvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!anderson
From: anderson@ittvax.UUCP (Scott Anderson)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Protocol missing scenes
Message-ID: <1603@ittvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 00:22:19 EST
Article-I.D.: ittvax.1603
Posted: Thu Jan 17 00:22:19 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jan-85 00:40:49 EST
References: <1585@pur-phy.UUCP> <1197@ihuxm.UUCP>
Organization: ITT-ATC, Stratford Ct.
Lines: 20

> 
> I haven't seen the movie, however, I understand from someone who likes
> Goldie Hawn that the movie is really terrible.  There's no good comedy
> in it as there was in Private Benjeman, just stupidity.
> 
> Can anyone validate this claim?

Yes, I saw @i(Protocol) and I enthusiastically recommend that you do NOT
see it.  I have a very high tolerance for sappy movies, and it exceeded
my tolerance by a good margin.  Some movies are not for diabetics; this
one is not for people.  I almost had to go for the barf bag when she 
started to read the Declaration of Independence to the Senate committee,
which was, of course, listening with awe and admiration.

Do not see this movie--let it be a flop.
-- 
Scott D. Anderson
decvax!ittvax!anderson
203-385-7451 or 203-375-0200 for operator