Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!msb From: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) Newsgroups: net.lang Subject: Re: High-levelity Message-ID: <276@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 9-Jan-85 12:30:05 EST Article-I.D.: lsuc.276 Posted: Wed Jan 9 12:30:05 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jan-85 12:54:21 EST References: <1242@bbncca.ARPA> <10@mit-athena.ARPA> <2678@dartvax.UUCP> Reply-To: msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 18 Summary: APL is higher-level than BASIC (frivolous article) > > In Basic...I would > invert a matrix A using the statement: > > 100 MAT A = INV (A) > > What could be more high-level? How about APL (or the last APL I used, anyway)? A gets domino A Where "gets" is a left arrow and "domino" is quad-overstrike-divide-sign. None of these silly MATs or needless function calls. Frivolously, Mark Brader one-time APList