Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: In defense of net.women.only (FLAME!) Message-ID: <1178@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 15:47:24 EST Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1178 Posted: Fri Jan 11 15:47:24 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 13-Jan-85 08:16:47 EST References: <580006@acf4.UUCP> Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 26 [Keep net.women.only for women only!] >From: greenber@acf4.UUCP (ross m. greenberg) > >I think the rule in question stinks --- but I will abide by it until it >is changed. I don't really know how to go about changing a rule on >the net since the net (and its "rules") are so informal. If somebody >out there has an idea of how to remove this group (without violating one >of the few rules we have here), please let me know. > >Ross M. Greenberg I'm offended by you being offended by the rule that only women are supposed to post in net.women.only! WHY IN THE !"#$%& DO YOU REALLY CARE?! Don't women have enough problems in this limp society without silly people like you trying to bust up their discussions?! Look, wombat breath :-), If you want to start or or enter a discussion which pertains to women, use net.women. But as for net.women.only, IT AIN'T BROKE, SO DON'T FIX IT!! -- The above viewpoints are mine. They are unrelated to those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer. Ken Montgomery "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs" ...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm [Usenet, when working] kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA [for Arpanauts only]