Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aesat.UUCP Path: utzoo!aesat!rwh From: rwh@aesat.UUCP (Russ Herman) Newsgroups: net.suicide Subject: Re: Ability to exit life at will. Message-ID: <319@aesat.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 22:55:52 EST Article-I.D.: aesat.319 Posted: Thu Jan 10 22:55:52 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 10-Jan-85 23:05:34 EST References: <223@cmu-cs-cad.ARPA> Organization: AES Data Inc., Mississauga, Ont., CANADA L5N 3C9 Lines: 21 >I agree with this but seem to have one problem in applying it. The version >of the rule in my brain is the above, "... except that since I am a greedy >little thing I will interfere with close friends because I don't want to lose >them." This has been tested (not through any choice of my own) but I haven't >resolved the inconsistency yet. Maybe the problem is that what has been >sprung on me has been sprung suddenly, rather than being discussed >'rationally'. lll-crg!dragon Yes, it *is* appropriate for you to intervene. If the person were determined to suicide, he/she wouldn't even bother to discuss it with you. The fact that it comes up at all is evidence of doubts. Your "greed" may show that person that somebody really does care about their existence. In irrational suicides - the vast majority of the cases - that can make a difference. -- ______ Russ Herman / \ {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!aesat!rwh @( ? ? )@ ( || ) The opinions above are strictly personal, and ( \__/ ) do not reflect those of my employer (or even \____/ possibly myself an hour from now.)