Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site waltz.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!waltz!meyer From: meyer@waltz.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Auto Occupant Positions Message-ID: <32000002@waltz.UUCP> Date: Fri, 18-Jan-85 10:30:00 EST Article-I.D.: waltz.32000002 Posted: Fri Jan 18 10:30:00 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 22-Jan-85 05:37:37 EST References: <60@ucbcad.UUCP> Lines: 14 Nf-ID: #R:ucbcad:-6000:waltz:32000002:000:958 Nf-From: waltz!meyer Jan 18 09:30:00 1985 I think the big reason we haven't noticed any radical changes in the way passengers are oriented in an automobile is that the current one is most likely to be the SAFEST. I don't want to be a passenger in a "ring" oriented car that -- would be instant injury. And putting all the mechanical stuff through the middle of the car with passengers up and down each side would be totally anti-social. I'm happy with the current design. ============================================================================== Dane Meyer ARPA: ==> Meyer%waltz%TI-CSL@CSNET-Relay CSNET: ==> Meyer@TI-CSL USENET: ==> {convex!smu, ut-sally, texsun, rice}!waltz!meyer