Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site rna.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!rna!serge From: serge@rna.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: PISSED OFF (seatbelts) Message-ID: <43000009@rna.UUCP> Date: Mon, 14-Jan-85 14:59:00 EST Article-I.D.: rna.43000009 Posted: Mon Jan 14 14:59:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 01:41:16 EST References: <932@amdahl.UUCP> Lines: 26 Nf-ID: #R:amdahl:-93200:rna:43000009:000:1300 Nf-From: rna!serge Jan 15 14:59:00 1985 What upsets me is the fact that available auto safety technology is not used by the car manufactures. I recently saw a documentary about this car called the Research Safety Vehicle. The RSV included such features as: - air-bags - energy absorbing collapseable engine and trunk sections - light weight energy absorbing foam in the body panel voids - a frame designed to rollover upright without collapsing - reinforced bars in the door panels for side collisions - and of course seat belts. The car was not ugly, it was energy efficient and would carry a price tag of about 7,000 to 8,000 dollars if mass produced. Test show that people would come out of 50 mph collision with a brick wall with absolutely no injuries. Then there was the case of the women with a used car that, unknown to her, had had airbags installed during the short time in the 70's when they were available as options. She hit a truck head on and the car was demolished. The officer who first arrived on the scene called for an ambulance to take the bodies away. He was very shocked to see the woman and her passanger walk away unharmed. Seat belts would not have saved them. It would be nice that while the lawmakers are telling us what to do they could at least do something to get this safety technology out on the roads.