Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site homxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!homxa!carson From: carson@homxa.UUCP (P.CARSTENSEN) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.women Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance Message-ID: <601@homxa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 7-Jan-85 19:06:45 EST Article-I.D.: homxa.601 Posted: Mon Jan 7 19:06:45 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jan-85 04:16:21 EST References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> <894@dual.UUCP> <1007@opus.UUCP> <4015@ucbvax.ARPA> <181@ihu1m.UUCP>, <628@utcsrgv.Re: Anti-porn ordinance Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 6 Xref: watmath net.legal:1227 net.women:3981 When I first heard about the proposed ordinance, I thought it was wonderfully imaginative, a very clever side-step to get to the unprotected side of a real problem....I didn't necessarily think it ought to be passed (I don't like cencorship, and I don't much like pornography (the dirty movie channel don't count :-))... P.