Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site akgua.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!edb From: edb@akgua.UUCP (E.D. Brooks [Emily]) Newsgroups: net.books,net.women Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ... Message-ID: <1183@akgua.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 10:18:15 EST Article-I.D.: akgua.1183 Posted: Thu Jan 10 10:18:15 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:10:57 EST References: <243@looking.UUCP>, <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Technologies/Bell Labs, Atlanta Lines: 15 Xref: watmath net.books:1200 net.women:4044 Re: >How many wives/girlfriends feel OK about their husbands/boyfriends >reading this stuff? > >Paul Dubuc cbscc!pmd Personally, I have never cared one whit what my husband reads/thinks/fantasizes - his mind is his own. It is the way he treats me that is important. And THAT is just fine! If pornography is degrading, then I agree with whoever it was that stated that it is our societal ATTITUDE toward sex that promotes this "degradation" not an innate property of pornography. Emily Brooks akgua!edb