Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccicpg.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!pertec!ccicpg!gershon From: gershon@ccicpg.UUCP ( Gershon Shamay) Newsgroups: net.works Subject: TCP/IP and system V Message-ID: <111@ccicpg.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13-Jan-85 15:29:36 EST Article-I.D.: ccicpg.111 Posted: Sun Jan 13 15:29:36 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 17-Jan-85 13:42:23 EST Distribution: net Organization: CCI-CPG, Irvine, CA Lines: 15 Maybe I'm out of touch (partly because we're new on Usenet). But I'm going to ask, anyway. Does anyone know about a TCP/IP implementation on a pure system V ? I know about the Pyramid system. But what can one do if he's stuck with just system V and no Berkeley ? I'd love to know how this was done. There's of course the possibility to have just the Ethernet (or any other) physical media driver in the kernel and do the upper layers as user processes. But then most likely the performance is lousy. Or maybe you can't even keep up with the data rates. Did anyone implement it and how ? Even more - any rumors about AT&T's intentions to implement some normal networking in system V.x.x ? Thanks for info / rumors / ideas / flames , etc. Gershon Shamay