Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-regina!lasko From: lasko@regina.DEC Newsgroups: net.games.frp Subject: Re: "Electrify Druid" Message-ID: <122@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 11:15:16 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.122 Posted: Fri Jan 4 11:15:16 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 11-Jan-85 08:27:43 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 27 RE: "Electrify druid" (by Jeff Sontag) I like it! I like it! It has almost the same power, and exactly the same level as one spell I came up with a long time ago called "Immolation". "Immolation" did a bit more damage (d4/level), and I think you got screwed by your DM. You aren't getting anything better than a MU "Shocking Grasp" with that tickler. Effects are neat, but get your money's worth from your DM. Since multi-effect spells (Pyrotechnics, Fire Shield, et. al.) are common in AD&D(tm) it wouldn't be too unusual to stick "Electrify Druid", and "Immolation" together. My material component (apart from mistletoe, of course), was brimstone (sulfur), what do you use for "Electrify Druid"? I don't know whether I, in my GameMaster hat, would approve of your "electrifying" example. Specifically, the "Electrify Druid" stacked on "Invisiblity". I specifically didn't allow it with "Immolation" to avoid the question. What does anyone else think? [Coming soon: because no one asked for it. The second list of corrections to the "Long List of FRPs"] tim lasko DEC, Maynard, Massachusetts {ihnp4, decwrl, seismo, allegra, et. al}!decvax!dec-rhea!dec-regina!lasko