Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf
From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Discussion vs. Convincing
Message-ID: <296@ccice6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 11:34:12 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice6.296
Posted: Thu Jan 17 11:34:12 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 01:26:30 EST
References: <217@decwrl.UUCP> <4882@fortune.UUCP>
Organization: The Wall Of Fog
Lines: 14

> > 2.  Bombing abortion clinics (provided no one get hurt) is merely property
> >     destruction.  I wonder if Hitler had put his camps in the city if they
> >     would not have been bombed also.  That's why they were remote.  If on
> >     a jury, I would never convict an abortion clinic bomber as I feel he
> >     is going to the aid of the defensless.
> 
> Maybe somebody should bomb your house while nobody is home, would you feel
> that it is "only property destruction"?
> 

Your analogy is incorrect. The abortion clinic is the property of
rational thinking people.
-- 
The Last Surviving Bronto