Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site olivee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!gnome
From: gnome@olivee.UUCP (Gary Traveis)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ...
Message-ID: <235@olivee.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 15:40:31 EST
Article-I.D.: olivee.235
Posted: Thu Jan 17 15:40:31 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 02:01:34 EST
References: <243@looking.UUCP> <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP> <760@sdcsla.UUCP>
Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca
Lines: 15
Keywords: freedom censorship ban pornography
Xref: watmath net.books:1261 net.women:4157


Someone out there should do us all a favor and dig last
years pornography discussion off of mag tape (in a condensed form)
and repost it.  Three months out of every year is taken up by
rehashing the same old crap.

It's true that this new ruling is worth discussion, but the
seemingly infinite flow of subject tangents are nothing more
than "old news" -- clearly a good candidate for net.flames!



"What's the bottom line!"

	Gary