Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site redwood.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!fortune!rhino!redwood!rpw3
From: rpw3@redwood.UUCP (Rob Warnock)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: break label stuff
Message-ID: <116@redwood.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 13-Jan-85 11:40:12 EST
Article-I.D.: redwood.116
Posted: Sun Jan 13 11:40:12 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Jan-85 07:54:18 EST
References: <4167@ucbvax.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: [Consultant], Foster City, CA
Lines: 76
+---------------
| I can't keep track of all the variations of the break syntax.
| None of them have the immeadate clarity I'm use to in codeing in C.
| Could someone point me at a language that has labeled loops
| without gotos? I do prefer structured languages. But I don't
| agree with the compleate banishment of the unrestricted branch.
+---------------
The BLISS language, which is about as old as "C", has no
"goto" at all. ("Never did, never will...") It DOES have the
"leave