Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site homxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!homxa!carson
From: carson@homxa.UUCP (P.CARSTENSEN)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance
Message-ID: <601@homxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Jan-85 19:06:45 EST
Article-I.D.: homxa.601
Posted: Mon Jan  7 19:06:45 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jan-85 04:16:21 EST
References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> <894@dual.UUCP> <1007@opus.UUCP> <4015@ucbvax.ARPA> <181@ihu1m.UUCP>, <628@utcsrgv.Re: Anti-porn ordinance
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 6
Xref: watmath net.legal:1227 net.women:3981

When I first heard about the proposed ordinance, I thought it was
wonderfully imaginative, a very clever side-step to get to the
unprotected side of a real problem....I didn't necessarily think
it ought to be passed (I don't like cencorship, and I don't much
like pornography (the dirty movie channel don't count :-))...
P.