Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site olivee.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!gnome From: gnome@olivee.UUCP (Gary Traveis) Newsgroups: net.books,net.women Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ... Message-ID: <235@olivee.UUCP> Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 15:40:31 EST Article-I.D.: olivee.235 Posted: Thu Jan 17 15:40:31 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 02:01:34 EST References: <243@looking.UUCP> <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP> <760@sdcsla.UUCP> Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca Lines: 15 Keywords: freedom censorship ban pornography Xref: watmath net.books:1261 net.women:4157 Someone out there should do us all a favor and dig last years pornography discussion off of mag tape (in a condensed form) and repost it. Three months out of every year is taken up by rehashing the same old crap. It's true that this new ruling is worth discussion, but the seemingly infinite flow of subject tangents are nothing more than "old news" -- clearly a good candidate for net.flames! "What's the bottom line!" Gary