Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!jeff From: jeff@dciem.UUCP (Jeff Richardson) Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: Reorganization of NFL Message-ID: <1333@dciem.UUCP> Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 14:56:45 EST Article-I.D.: dciem.1333 Posted: Tue Jan 22 14:56:45 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 22-Jan-85 16:17:23 EST References:Reply-To: jeff@dciem.UUCP (Jeff Richardson) Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada Lines: 24 Summary: > It's interesting to see the comments (well, two of them, anyway) > about how strong the Western Conference West looks, with the 4 > Cal. teams plus Seattle. True. It would be a strong division now, but that doesn't really matter. Any realignment they do has to be looked at as a long-term thing, (look at how long the current, meaningless alignment has lasted), and the teams that are strong five years from now may be completely different. It wasn't too many years ago that the Chargers were great while the 49ers and the Seahawks were both lousy. Besides, they're certainly far from a balance in the strength of the divisions now. > BTW, someone pointed out that Seattle is probably more than > 1,000 miles from San Diego. That may be true, but I doubt that you could come up with a division where Seattle wasn't almost that far away from somebody in it, and if you did somebody in another division would be a lot further away from some of his divisional rivals. Seattle's a lot closer to San Diego than to Kansas City anyway. -- Jeff Richardson, DCIEM, Toronto (416) 635-2073 {linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd}!utcsrgv!dciem!jeff {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!dciem!jeff