Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ho95b.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!ho95b!ran From: ran@ho95b.UUCP (RANeinast) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: flood and Bible Message-ID: <288@ho95b.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 11:10:57 EST Article-I.D.: ho95b.288 Posted: Fri Jan 4 11:10:57 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Jan-85 02:48:48 EST Organization: AT&T-Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ Lines: 31 >Marcel gets into a discussion of the Bible. I guess he is trying to >fit it into todays thinking. > >What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended >to be. According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of >God. That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books. >Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean >we are right and He is wrong. Perspective is a powerful thing. > >karen alias larryg This posting is the literal word of God, and I created the universe in a Big Bang and let it evolve. There, this writing is now also set apart from all other writings or books (because, by according to this writing itself, it is the literal word of God). Just because I don't fit into YOUR way of thinking doesn't mean you are right and I am wrong. Same "logic" as karen. God (as transmitted by), -- ". . . and shun the frumious Bandersnatch." Robert Neinast (ihnp4!ho95b!ran) AT&T-Bell Labs