Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!flink
From: flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul Torek)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: correction, plus answ. to "simple question"
Message-ID: <2378@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-Jan-85 17:18:44 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2378
Posted: Wed Jan  9 17:18:44 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Jan-85 00:38:36 EST
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 15

[]
In a recent reply to Sophie Quigley I said, "Not that I am answering
your questions exactly as asked ...".  That should read, "NOTE that
I am answering ...".  Now, on to the next question.

From: ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig)
> Can someone please explain to me why abortion should
> have a different legal status than killing animals?

Sure:  abortion is OK, but killing animals is wrong.  People who
believe otherwise are mistaken.

This is not my real view, but it shows how questions like 
this should be answered.
			--the aspiring iconoclast