Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!rick
From: rick@uwmacc.UUCP (the absurdist)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance
Message-ID: <640@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Jan-85 15:36:42 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.640
Posted: Sun Jan  6 15:36:42 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jan-85 03:00:26 EST
References: <257@hocsp.UUCP> <318@ahuta.UUCP>
Reply-To: rick@uwmacc.UUCP (Rick Keir)
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.books:1171 net.movies:5406 net.legal:1220 net.women:3976
Summary: 

In article <318@ahuta.UUCP> ecl@ahuta.UUCP (e.leeper) writes:
>And I don't believe that any such censorship ordinance would stand a First
>Amendment test, regardless of the number of lawyers who write it.  

I sincerely hope you are right.  However, before we go placing too
much trust in the 1st Amendment, remember that the ultimate interpretation
would be that of the Supreme Court:  the organization which once decided
that Dred Scott was property.
-- 
"When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean -- 
neither more nor less"  -- Humpty Dumpty, the noted linguist

Rick Keir -- MicroComputer Information Center, MACC
1210 West Dayton St/U Wisconsin Madison/Mad WI 53706
{allegra, ihnp4, seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!rick