Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!simone
From: simone@lsuc.UUCP (Simone Sherman)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: re social security
Message-ID: <283@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 12:33:46 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.283
Posted: Fri Jan 11 12:33:46 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Jan-85 14:11:20 EST
References: <804@hound.UUCP>
Reply-To: simone@lsuc.UUCP (Simone Sherman)
Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 16

In article <804@hound.UUCP> 551rcg@hound.UUCP (R.GANNS) writes:
||Does anyone out there have any facts about what percentage of total
||social security revenues goes to overhead vs how much actually gets
||paid out to recipients? I suspect that the difficulty of dismantling
||SS would be proportional to the size of the fraction going to support
||the administrative bureaucracy.


But once you dismantled social security you'd start reaping benefits
which would continue indefinitely (or until it was started up again :-) ).

Simone Sherman

-- 
{utzoo pesnta nrcaero utcs}!lsuc!simone
{allegra decvax ihnp4 linus}!utcsrgv!lsuc!simone