Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!nsc!srm From: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) Newsgroups: net.books,net.legal,net.women Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade anybody Message-ID: <2221@nsc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 01:13:21 EST Article-I.D.: nsc.2221 Posted: Thu Jan 17 01:13:21 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 01:33:51 EST References: <4699@tektronix.UUCP> <2758@ncsu.UUCP> <2193@nsc.UUCP> <5249@duke.UUCP> Reply-To: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.books:1240 net.legal:1316 net.women:4118 Summary: In article <5249@duke.UUCP> crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin) writes: > > >If you think the founding fathers had no "feminist >sensibilities", read up on them. In fact, as far as holding slaves, >there were some pretty strong attempts to eliminate that too, which were >thwarted in an early play of the "if we can't keep slaves we won't play" >ploy repeated 4*20+7 years later. > Yes, they fought over slavery and they fought over whether to include women as equals. We all know how those fights came out. -- Richard Mateosian {allegra,cbosgd,decwrl,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA