Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1m.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihu1m!gadfly From: gadfly@ihu1m.UUCP (Gadfly) Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance Message-ID: <181@ihu1m.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 00:10:51 EST Article-I.D.: ihu1m.181 Posted: Fri Jan 4 00:10:51 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Jan-85 05:17:26 EST References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> <894@dual.UUCP> <1007@opus.UUCP>, <4015@ucbvax.ARPA> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 25 Xref: watmath net.books:1161 net.movies:5394 net.legal:1191 net.women:3956 -- >> _60 Minutes_ had a story on the Minneapolis anti-porn law last year. >> No, the law wasn't written by narrow-minded Fallwellites; it was >> written by radical feminists! If I recall right, the two authors >> were working on getting similar laws passed in Indianapolis and Madison >> (WI). >> Nick Cuccia The mainstream of feminism in Madison (you know, the folks who successfully engineered the recall of a judge who stated on the record that a five-year-old kid had "invited rape") has thoroughly, in fact publicly, disassociated itself from this effort. In fact, it's only being pushed by one very vocal member of the Dane County Board who has yet to put anything specific on paper. Let's not get too heavy into feminist-bashing. All the feminists I know have been very vocal in opposing these ordinances. -- *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 03 Jan 85 [14 Nivose An CXCIII] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-7188 ** ** ** ** ..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken *** ***