Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!flink From: flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul Torek) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: correction, plus answ. to "simple question" Message-ID: <2378@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 9-Jan-85 17:18:44 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2378 Posted: Wed Jan 9 17:18:44 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 11-Jan-85 00:38:36 EST Distribution: na Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 15 [] In a recent reply to Sophie Quigley I said, "Not that I am answering your questions exactly as asked ...". That should read, "NOTE that I am answering ...". Now, on to the next question. From: ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) > Can someone please explain to me why abortion should > have a different legal status than killing animals? Sure: abortion is OK, but killing animals is wrong. People who believe otherwise are mistaken. This is not my real view, but it shows how questions like this should be answered. --the aspiring iconoclast