Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Libertarianism & basketball Message-ID: <1181@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 18:13:54 EST Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1181 Posted: Fri Jan 11 18:13:54 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Jan-85 00:51:55 EST References: <272@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <648@bunker.UUCP> <420@whuxl.UUCP> Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 16 >the Indians had no concept that you could restrict another's liberty >to use or roam the land by claiming something called "ownership". >Why should ANYONE be able to claim they own the land? > tim sevener whuxl!orb By that logic, Mr. Sevener, how can *you* claim to own the clothes that you are (presumably :-)) wearing? After all, that claim restricts the freedom of others to wear them... -- The above viewpoints are mine. They are unrelated to those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer. Ken Montgomery "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs" ...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm [Usenet, when working] kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA [for Arpanauts only]