Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uok.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!dwhitney From: dwhitney@uok.UUCP Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: "2010" goofs and "Dune" stuff - WHO Message-ID: <5100045@uok.UUCP> Date: Mon, 7-Jan-85 19:04:00 EST Article-I.D.: uok.5100045 Posted: Mon Jan 7 19:04:00 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Jan-85 01:36:15 EST References: <620@ccice5.UUCP> Lines: 18 Nf-ID: #R:ccice5:-62000:uok:5100045:000:911 Nf-From: uok!dwhitney Jan 7 18:04:00 1985 Hey, Take it easy!! This newsgroup is for the exchange of ideas and thoughts regarding movies, be they sci-fi, high drama, comedy, whatever. Let's don't start getting angry with people simply if they have a common interest; part of being a movie "critic" (and I think that's part of why this group exists) is to discuss the flaws and/or successes of any film. If we start forbidding (or merely severely chastising) those who say "Yes, I saw the same thing, and here's something else" then we might as well completely restrict the group to reviews. No discussions, arguments, etc. But I hardly believe that's the intent of a more-or-less interactive discussion forum. Two reviews might rave about a film, but for different reasons. So should we arbitrarily shut down all "agreeing" reviews simply to avoid the aforementioned "Me, Too!" syndrome? I didn't think so. David Whitney ctvax!uokvax!uok!dwhitney