Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site waltz.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!waltz!meyer
From: meyer@waltz.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Auto Occupant Positions
Message-ID: <32000002@waltz.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Jan-85 10:30:00 EST
Article-I.D.: waltz.32000002
Posted: Fri Jan 18 10:30:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 22-Jan-85 05:37:37 EST
References: <60@ucbcad.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:ucbcad:-6000:waltz:32000002:000:958
Nf-From: waltz!meyer    Jan 18 09:30:00 1985

I think the big reason we haven't noticed any radical changes in the way
passengers are oriented in an automobile is that the current one is
most likely to be the SAFEST.  I don't want to be a passenger in a "ring"
oriented car that -- would be instant injury.  And putting all the 
mechanical stuff through the middle of the car with passengers up and down
each side would be totally anti-social.  I'm happy with the current design.
==============================================================================
                                                                              
Dane Meyer                                                                   
                                                                 
ARPA:   ==> Meyer%waltz%TI-CSL@CSNET-Relay                       
CSNET:  ==> Meyer@TI-CSL                                                     
USENET: ==> {convex!smu, ut-sally, texsun, rice}!waltz!meyer