Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: net.crypt
Subject: Re: Analog time-segment voice scramblers-- How Secure?
Message-ID: <4966@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Jan-85 20:21:09 EST
Article-I.D.: utzoo.4966
Posted: Sat Jan 19 20:21:09 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jan-85 20:21:09 EST
References: <648@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 7

I'm not an expert on this stuff, but my general impression is that no
analog scrambler is really considered particularly secure.  There is
so much redundancy in a voice that it's almost impossible for an analog
system to hide it all from would-be eavesdroppers.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry