Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site eisx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!spuxll!eisx!jtb
From: jtb@eisx.UUCP (J. Burgess)
Newsgroups: net.news.adm
Subject: Is this sys file entry OK?
Message-ID: <846@eisx.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 17:48:00 EST
Article-I.D.: eisx.846
Posted: Thu Jan 10 17:48:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:03:33 EST
Organization: AT&T Info. Sys. Labs, South Plainfield NJ
Lines: 24

I currently run 2.10.1 news (with the intention of converting to 2.10.2
    1) when the bug reports stop, and
    2) when somebody can then send me source with all the proper
	fixes in it!  and now back to our story)

I just went through most of the discussion of sys file entries,
distributions and such.   Now, can anybody tell me if this entry
from my sys file is OK in 2.10.2?
It works fine in 2.10!

spuxll:all,!l,!to,to.spuxll:F:/usr/spool/batch/spuxll

Obviously, I'm only interested in critiques on field 2.

By the way, the '!l' is intended to prevent distribution of
our "local" groups - l.all.

John Burgess
-- 
John Burgess
ATT-IS (CP LOB) Labs,
So. Plainfield NJ  (HP 1C-221)
uucp: {most AT&T machines}!eisx!jtb
phone: (201) 561-7100 x2481