Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ucbvax!cuccia
From: cuccia@ucbvax.ARPA (Nick Cuccia)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance
Message-ID: <4015@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 3-Jan-85 18:54:27 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.4015
Posted: Thu Jan  3 18:54:27 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Jan-85 05:13:51 EST
References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> <894@dual.UUCP> <1007@opus.UUCP>
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.books:1160 net.movies:5391 net.legal:1190 net.women:3955

> > <*munch*>
> > 
> > This is the most ridiculous thing I have read in a long time!!!  Where in the
> > hell do the narrow-minded Fallwellites who wrote that law get off saying that
		^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Helen Anne Vigneau
_60 Minutes_ had a story on the Minneapolis anti-porn law last year.
No, the law wasn't written by narrow-minded Fallwellites; it was
written by radical feminists!  If I recall right, the two authors
were working on getting similar laws passed in Indianapolis and Madison
(WI).

Besides, I didn't think that Fallwellites thought that women had rights ! 8-)

--Nick Cuccia
--cuccia%ucbmiro@Berkeley
--ucbvax!cuccia