Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site spar.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!spar!ellis From: ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Lauri's Karma or lack thereof Message-ID: <35@spar.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 05:04:38 EST Article-I.D.: spar.35 Posted: Tue Jan 15 05:04:38 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jan-85 16:05:21 EST References: <129@dadla.UUCP> Reply-To: ellis@max.UUCP (Michael Ellis) Organization: Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, CA Lines: 27 From Cheryl Van Hoo: >I hate to add to this discussion in a way that will make the NET >go up in arms and flame (or smoulder), but personally, I actually >agree with the graffitti "Murder all Rapists" I feel the same way >about murderers, robbers and any other section of humanity that >believes they have the GOD given right to "TAKE" anything from >another human being. I must sympathize with anyone who feels that a rapist or, any other person who actually committed a violent crime, ought to receive the harshest possible punishment; furthermore, that in self-defense from such a monster, practically any means of force are justifiable. But by definition, MURDER is not justifiable. Perhaps what you meant was a fair trial, and, in the case of a guilty verdict, a death sentence. Without due course of law, we are certain to sink into vigilante-ism of the sort not seen since the rape of the west, or since the heyday of the Ku Klux Klan. Surely you are not eager to give up one of the few basic rights that distinguish this nation from so many brutal places on this planet? -michael