Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncsu.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!ncsu!druid From: druid@ncsu.UUCP (druid) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: what is love? Message-ID: <2754@ncsu.UUCP> Date: Sun, 6-Jan-85 21:32:53 EST Article-I.D.: ncsu.2754 Posted: Sun Jan 6 21:32:53 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jan-85 05:40:51 EST Organization: N.C. State University, Raleigh Lines: 28 <<>> > Robert > Being "in love" is looking out for the others best interest, only. > Being "in love" is fulfilling the other persons every need. > Being "in love" is accepting the good and bad in the other person. Agreed. > Being "in love" is being confident, secure, and taking the initiative. I beg to differ. Being "in love" does *not* mean being confident and secure. "Love" means being confident and secure. (depends on your point of view and your definitions of the above phrases) Seems to me we went through this discussion just about a year ago, along with the "love" vs "in love" arguments. Somebody at the time (either chuq or spaf) posted a great article about what love and in-love are, and I remember adding to that. I'll see if I can dig up (i saved it somewhere). If either Chuq or Gene reposts the original, please let me know now, so I don't post it again. Something about a party after the new year, Gene? Any plans yet? Oh yeah: Happy New Year Everyone!! dave /\ -- druid / daveh -- hesselberth \/ -- decvax!mcnc!ncsu!druid / ncsu!ievax!daveh -- The Druid of NC aka: the Arch-Druid Kadok