Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!bandy
From: bandy@mit-eddie.UUCP (++Andrew Scott Beals)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: sex with sheep?1?
Message-ID: <3454@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Jan-85 19:15:32 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.3454
Posted: Fri Jan 18 19:15:32 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 01:47:23 EST
References: <237@teklds.UUCP> <316@topaz.ARPA>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 121

>From: gallaher@topaz.ARPA (Mike Gallaher)
>>>From: bandy@lll-crg.ARPA (Andrew Scott Beals)
>>>Subject: net.flame seems pretty dim to me
>>>
>>>[soft, fuzzy, warm mouths, no complaining, no brains]
>>>[good sex, slaughter, leg of lamb, duality in mouth watering]
>>>[animalistic urges]
>>>[joy, rapture unforseen]
>>>[deep eyes, bright teeth, many breasts]
>>>[no more art gallaries, folk music, or bad feminist poetry]
>> 
>> What is this?  Is that for real?  If it is, it is the most
>> disgusting thing I have ever heard of.  How degrading to an animal
>> for a (human) animal to have sex with it.  I would rather you raped
>>  a woman because then maybe she could put you away for quite a while.
>> 
>> karen alias larryg
>
>There's a passage in the Bible saying (to paraphrase) "thou shalt
>not lie with an animal."  

No, no, Mister Gallaher, the passages says "Thou shalt not lie to an
animal nor shall thou lie with a son of Adam or a daughter of Eve."

You people have been getting it backwards all these years and sending
all us poor animal lovers to jail!

>Well, as any student of legislation knows,
>There wouldn't be a law against it if people didn't like to do it!

No, that's not quite right, either (my my, you /do/ seem to be awfully
confused today, Mike (may I call you "Mike"? No? Just  who the #$&#^ do
you think you are, Herr Gallaher (an Irish nazi? hmm.. Well, given the
activities of some of our cousins in good old N.I., this doesn't seem
to be too unlikely, but I digress)) MISTER GALLAHER.

As everyone knows, the government doesn't make a law against it, unless
it is clearly The Right Thing To Do. (like law-abiding citizens carrying
firearms (when *all* the criminals have them!), or blowing away four 
teen-aged punks when they hassle you on the subway, or like storing
nuclear waste in your backyard) 

Ha ha! Fooled all you long-haired hippy-freak dope-fiends! Bet you thought
I was going to go into a diatribe against the illegalization of your
favorite mind-alterer, eh?

>Why is it that you are disgusted by the concept of satisfying
>feelings of lust via an easily procured sheep? 

Hear! Hear! Good show!

>While the cretin

You're starting to get me annoyed here. WATCH IT!

>who posted the original message probably has no other recourse
>than to seek the companionship of fleecy bedmates,

How would **you** know? Besides, sheep are *warm* and *fuzzy*, even
when they're wet!

>surely you don't really wish that he would impose his base urges
>on some innocent *woman*? 

Since you seem to be so abhored(sp?) by the concept of my imposing my
urges on some *woman*, then how 'bout on something else? Men? Machinery?
What about the Government? After all, they get to screw every last one
of us every year on April 15th.

>What if he were to choose *you* for this honor? 

Say, that's an IDEA!  Karen (or LarryG - whatEVER your name is (does
this mean that you're schizo? Well, given some of the Good News flavored
flammage I've seen... yes, I believe that this is the case)), are you
going to be at Usenix? Maybe we could get together and I'll give you
my black wool lace underwear (sheep-sized, of course) to symbolize my
giving up ewes.

>Better that he should save the female half of humanity from his
>carnal activity [sic!]. 

Well, every time I've been to bed with someone who is female, I've had
this in-cred-ible urge to eat greasy pork afterwards. What /does/ this
mean, anyway?

>Is it more disgusting to take a sheep to bed than to behead, butcher,
>and eat it?  

I do both, in succession, so this is really a moot point, don't you
think?  Of course I don't eat all of it - just the choicest delacacies
and then mail the rest of it to some of the starving people in Ethiopia.

>If I called myself a Christian,

Good thing you don't - I'd have to shoot you if I ever ran into you
in person.

>... even though some may consider my lifestyle as "walking in
>the darkness." 

Something like being aligned with the dark side of the force? What about
being aligned with the dark side of the duct tape (well, you don't need
it for sheep - wool stretches)? Or what about being aligned with the
dark side of the beer?

>I am not ashamed of what I feel

Or who?

>Why *does* the Bible proscribe bestiality?
>
>mg

No no no! It's _perscribe_, not _proscribe_. Jeez, one little spelling
misteak by an emptyheaded christian and what happens???

------ ------ ------
[my opinions aren't mine, either. i found them in a bottle that said "drink me"]
	andy beals
arpa:	bandy@{lll-crg,mit-mc}
uucp:	{sun!lll-crg,dartvax!bedford,ihnp4!mit-eddie}!bandy