Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf
From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: male/female differences
Message-ID: <298@ccice6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 17:31:03 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice6.298
Posted: Thu Jan 17 17:31:03 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 02:33:10 EST
References: <74@mot.UUCP> <1606@psuvax1.UUCP>
Organization: The Wall Of Fog
Lines: 22

>   A big difference between men and women is that men are naturally
>   promiscuous and women are not.  This is because a male can maximize
>   the survival of his genes by having as many partners as possible.


I think we may have a problem here. Assume a population of 20
with 10 males and 10 females. Now for the males to be promiscuous
they need to have at least 2 partners. Now how can they achieve this
without the females becoming promiscuous?

The answer is clear. The males are engaging in homosexual activities.
This raises a new question. How does two males having sex maximize
survival of genes?

The answer is clear. The women are revolted by the homosexuals
and mate only with the non promiscuous males. Therefore through
time we see that monogamy was selected. So why does the original
article try to plead a case for promiscuity.

The answer is clear. The author is homosexual.
-- 
The Last Surviving Bronto