Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Big Breasts
Message-ID: <353@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 19:46:40 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.353
Posted: Fri Jan  4 19:46:40 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Jan-85 04:14:40 EST
References: <238@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 27

[I'm going to regret posting this...]

Laugh if you will, but I recall reading that part of the reason human males
(in general, not "most" or "all" or "99.9%") are supposedly attracted to the
female breast (especially those of larger size) has to do with (aside from the
purported maternal Freudian complexes) their visual similarity to the
buttocks.  You see, most mammals I can think of off the top of my head (and I
can't think of that many right now) mate "doggie-style" (female on "all fours",
male approaching from behind).  Thus the visual image associated with sex (by
the male) is that of the female buttocks (relating to Lisa's mentioning the
hips).  The cleavage of the human female breasts (of "sufficient" size), it is
theorized, comes close enough to resemble the female rear end, (I don't think
any other mammals have dual horizontally-aligned breasts that do the same) such
that humans were prompted to engage in face-to-face sex.  Hence the attraction
to (in some cases, obsession with) the female bosom.  It's just a theory.

(I have another theory, the theory #2 which is the second theory that I have.
 AHEM! AHEM! ... )

I personally find large breasts to be (ahem) visually alluring, but for me
they're just like long hair:  quite nice to look at, but it just gets in the
way.

(But I wouldn't repeat that in front of certain woman friends of mine... )
-- 
Now I've lost my train of thought. I'll have to catch the bus of thought.
			Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr