Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxj!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!ncsu!druid
From: druid@ncsu.UUCP (druid)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: what is love?
Message-ID: <2754@ncsu.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Jan-85 21:32:53 EST
Article-I.D.: ncsu.2754
Posted: Sun Jan  6 21:32:53 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jan-85 05:40:51 EST
Organization: N.C. State University, Raleigh
Lines: 28

<<>>
> Robert
> 	Being "in love" is looking out for the others best interest, only.
> 	Being "in love" is fulfilling the other persons every need.
> 	Being "in love" is accepting the good and bad in the other person.

	Agreed.

> 	Being "in love" is being confident, secure, and taking the initiative.

	I beg to differ.  Being "in love" does *not* mean being confident 
and secure.  "Love" means being confident and secure. (depends on your point
of view and your definitions of the above phrases)

	Seems to me we went through this discussion just about a year ago,
along with the "love" vs "in love" arguments.  Somebody at the time (either
chuq or spaf) posted a great article about what love and in-love are, and I
remember adding to that.  I'll see if I can dig up (i saved it somewhere).
If either Chuq or Gene reposts the original, please let me know now, so I
don't post it again.

	Something about a party after the new year, Gene?  Any plans yet?
Oh yeah:  Happy New Year Everyone!!

   dave		/\		    -- druid / daveh --
hesselberth	\/	-- decvax!mcnc!ncsu!druid / ncsu!ievax!daveh --
	 The Druid of NC       aka:	the Arch-Druid Kadok