Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site ittvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!anderson From: anderson@ittvax.UUCP (Scott Anderson) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Protocol missing scenes Message-ID: <1603@ittvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 00:22:19 EST Article-I.D.: ittvax.1603 Posted: Thu Jan 17 00:22:19 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jan-85 00:40:49 EST References: <1585@pur-phy.UUCP> <1197@ihuxm.UUCP> Organization: ITT-ATC, Stratford Ct. Lines: 20 > > I haven't seen the movie, however, I understand from someone who likes > Goldie Hawn that the movie is really terrible. There's no good comedy > in it as there was in Private Benjeman, just stupidity. > > Can anyone validate this claim? Yes, I saw @i(Protocol) and I enthusiastically recommend that you do NOT see it. I have a very high tolerance for sappy movies, and it exceeded my tolerance by a good margin. Some movies are not for diabetics; this one is not for people. I almost had to go for the barf bag when she started to read the Declaration of Independence to the Senate committee, which was, of course, listening with awe and admiration. Do not see this movie--let it be a flop. -- Scott D. Anderson decvax!ittvax!anderson 203-385-7451 or 203-375-0200 for operator