Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ucbvax!cuccia From: cuccia@ucbvax.ARPA (Nick Cuccia) Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance Message-ID: <4015@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Thu, 3-Jan-85 18:54:27 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.4015 Posted: Thu Jan 3 18:54:27 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Jan-85 05:13:51 EST References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> <894@dual.UUCP> <1007@opus.UUCP> Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 17 Xref: watmath net.books:1160 net.movies:5391 net.legal:1190 net.women:3955 > > <*munch*> > > > > This is the most ridiculous thing I have read in a long time!!! Where in the > > hell do the narrow-minded Fallwellites who wrote that law get off saying that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Helen Anne Vigneau _60 Minutes_ had a story on the Minneapolis anti-porn law last year. No, the law wasn't written by narrow-minded Fallwellites; it was written by radical feminists! If I recall right, the two authors were working on getting similar laws passed in Indianapolis and Madison (WI). Besides, I didn't think that Fallwellites thought that women had rights ! 8-) --Nick Cuccia --cuccia%ucbmiro@Berkeley --ucbvax!cuccia