Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.religion Subject: Re: Arndt replies to the "scholarly quote" (guaranteed laughs for all) Message-ID: <360@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Tue, 8-Jan-85 12:01:11 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.360 Posted: Tue Jan 8 12:01:11 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jan-85 06:16:41 EST References: <106@decwrl.UUCP> <350@pyuxd.UUCP> <752@sjuvax.UUCP> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J. Lines: 19 Xref: watmath net.flame:7521 net.religion:5239 > Since this discussion (loosely) deals with quotation, I would like to > point out an incomplete quotation on the part of Rich Rosen. > >>BRIAN: "No, you've got it all wrong! You don't have to follow me! You don't >> have to follow ANYONE! You've got to think for yourselves! You are >> all individuals!" >>CROWD: "YES, WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS!" Rich Rosen pyuxd!rlr > > Actually, there is another important part to this - > > (SMALL VOICE IN THE CROWD) : I'm not! > Binayak Banerjee > {allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!bbanerje Actually, the part after "YES, WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS!" goes like this: -- BRIAN: "You're all different!" CROWD: "YES, WE'RE ALL DIFFERENT!" Rich Rosen MAN: "I'm not ... " {ihnp4 | harpo}!pyuxd!rlr