Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site klipper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!mcvax!vu44!botter!klipper!biep
From: biep@klipper.UUCP (J. A. "Biep" Durieux)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Split Politics in 3
Message-ID: <414@klipper.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Jan-85 11:56:54 EST
Article-I.D.: klipper.414
Posted: Wed Jan 16 11:56:54 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 03:24:51 EST
References: <1038@aecom.UUCP> <225@lsuc.UUCP> <1079@aecom.UUCP> <267@lsuc.UUCP> <2237@randvax.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: VU Informatica, Amsterdam
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.news.group:2780 net.politics:6935

[]
	I propose:

	net.politics.isms (or .theory),
	net.politics.nat  (or .dom), for local (not international)
				politics (in any country!!), and
	net.politics.int  (or .world), for international politics.

	I prefer ".int" to ".world", for a war between two minor countries
	isn't quite a world politics affair.
	All articles transcending this tripartition should be posted to
	(and only be posted to!) net.politics. 
	Giving an example from real life should not form a reason to post
	an article from net.politics.isms in any of the other three groups.
-- 
							  Biep.
	{seismo|decvax|philabs}!mcvax!vu44!botter!klipper!biep

I utterly disagree with  everything  you are saying,  but I 
am prepared to fight to the death for your right to say it.
							--Voltaire