Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!riddle
From: riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Recent requests for splinter groups of net.music
Message-ID: <590@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Jan-85 20:47:10 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.590
Posted: Mon Jan  7 20:47:10 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jan-85 01:19:34 EST
References: <4241@tekecs.UUCP> <347@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Tx. at Houston-in-the-Hills
Lines: 14

I'm another of those who ranted a bit (although, I hope, not to the point of
flaming) against the splitup of net.music.  Now that it's happened, though,
I'd just as soon see it carried to a (reasonable) conclusion.  I must say
that I'm pleased to see how well net.music.classical and net.music.folk have
done since their creation -- it is apparent that there are people out there
who won't even read a general net.music but are more than happy to write
good articles for one aligned to their particular tastes.

Here's one more person who'd like to see net.music.jazz and net.music.synth.
(Did anyone but me notice, by the way, that  s i x t y  people responded to
Chuqui's net.singles poll saying that they liked jazz?)

--- Prentiss Riddle ("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.")
--- {ihnp4,harvard,seismo,gatech,ctvax}!ut-sally!riddle