Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site redwood.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!fortune!rhino!redwood!rpw3
From: rpw3@redwood.UUCP (Rob Warnock)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <120@redwood.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 07:36:32 EST
Article-I.D.: redwood.120
Posted: Tue Jan 15 07:36:32 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Jan-85 07:55:41 EST
References: <5700031@ea.UUCP> <55600003@uo-vax1.UUCP>
Organization: [Consultant], Foster City, CA
Lines: 23

+---------------
| Nf-ID: #R:ea:5700031:uo-vax1:55600003:37777777600:180
| Nf-From: uo-vax1!bill    Jan  9 19:10:00 1985
| 
| No, many people test ints, chars, etc.  For example if i and j equal
| 0x01 and 0x02 then i &= j gives i = 0, but i &&= j gives i = 1.
| 
| Mark Aitken
| {tektronix, hp-pcd}!uoregon!marka
+---------------

Hmmm... K & R [p.46, p.191, & p.215] certainly doesn't list "&&=" as one of
the legal operators, and the compiler I use (v.7 derived) doesn't hack it.

A local addition, perhaps?


Rob Warnock
Systems Architecture Consultant

UUCP:	{ihnp4,ucbvax!dual}!fortune!redwood!rpw3
DDD:	(415)572-2607
USPS:	510 Trinidad Lane, Foster City, CA  94404