Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site plus5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!plus5!hokey
From: hokey@plus5.UUCP (Hokey)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Standard for union initialization?
Message-ID: <553@plus5.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 00:18:39 EST
Article-I.D.: plus5.553
Posted: Tue Jan 15 00:18:39 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Jan-85 07:29:07 EST
References: <6995@brl-tgr.ARPA> <7004@brl-tgr.ARPA> <6847@watdaisy.UUCP> <10884@watmath.UUCP>
Organization: Plus Five Computer Services, St. Louis
Lines: 13

For starters, I hope people have been reading the discusison pertaining to
union initialization in mod.std.c.

After reading the note in mod.std.c from the Chair of the C Standards
Committee, however, I don't know if the discussion is good for anything;
he said the Committee decided on the "first element" rule and the issue
is closed.  I would *love* to see enough feedback on the issue to cause
the Committee to change their position.

Now, if only the Unix standards group would consider changing lockf()...
-- 
Hokey           ..ihnp4!plus5!hokey
		  314-725-9492