Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: male/female differences Message-ID: <298@ccice6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 17:31:03 EST Article-I.D.: ccice6.298 Posted: Thu Jan 17 17:31:03 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 21-Jan-85 02:33:10 EST References: <74@mot.UUCP> <1606@psuvax1.UUCP> Organization: The Wall Of Fog Lines: 22 > A big difference between men and women is that men are naturally > promiscuous and women are not. This is because a male can maximize > the survival of his genes by having as many partners as possible. I think we may have a problem here. Assume a population of 20 with 10 males and 10 females. Now for the males to be promiscuous they need to have at least 2 partners. Now how can they achieve this without the females becoming promiscuous? The answer is clear. The males are engaging in homosexual activities. This raises a new question. How does two males having sex maximize survival of genes? The answer is clear. The women are revolted by the homosexuals and mate only with the non promiscuous males. Therefore through time we see that monogamy was selected. So why does the original article try to plead a case for promiscuity. The answer is clear. The author is homosexual. -- The Last Surviving Bronto