Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!hoxna!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!mcvax!boring!steven From: steven@boring.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Pascal vs. C Message-ID: <6283@boring.UUCP> Date: Mon, 14-Jan-85 12:14:09 EST Article-I.D.: boring.6283 Posted: Mon Jan 14 12:14:09 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 10:12:53 EST References: <4859@utzoo.UUCP> <11@mit-athena.ARPA> <177@gcc-opus.ARPA> <7055@brl-tgr.ARPA> <25@seismo.UUCP> Reply-To: steven@boring.UUCP (Steven Pemberton) Organization: CWI, Amsterdam Lines: 10 Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL In article <25@seismo.UUCP> keith@seismo.UUCP (Keith Bostic) writes: > Come on -- let's not start a PASCAL vs. C debate, okay? Quite. But then why say more? > Pascal in its standard form is simply not useable for anything except cute > little application programs. I'm not the world's greatest Pascal fan, but this is just not true! I've seen many large useful programs written in standard Pascal, and written well. Steven Pemberton, CWI, Amsterdam.