Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!chris From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek) Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: Re: How many laws are we subject to? Message-ID: <2212@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 4-Jan-85 11:02:22 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2212 Posted: Fri Jan 4 11:02:22 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Jan-85 00:40:41 EST References: <449@mhuxt.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 13 I came up with this idea once, though I don't know if it would really work: for each new law enacted, at least two existing laws must be either abolished or justified. No law can be justified twice before all laws have been justified once. (This is not the best phrasing.) In other words, my idea is that we should perform law ``gc''s every once in a while. -- (This line accidently left nonblank.) In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (301) 454-7690 UUCP: {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris CSNet: chris@umcp-cs ARPA: chris@maryland