Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: In defense of net.women.only (FLAME!)
Message-ID: <1178@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Jan-85 15:47:24 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1178
Posted: Fri Jan 11 15:47:24 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Jan-85 08:16:47 EST
References: <580006@acf4.UUCP>
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 26

[Keep net.women.only for women only!]
>From: greenber@acf4.UUCP (ross m. greenberg)
>
>I think the rule in question stinks --- but I will abide by it until it
>is changed.  I don't really know how to go about changing a rule on
>the net since the net (and its "rules") are so informal.  If somebody
>out there has an idea of how to remove this group (without violating one
>of the few rules we have here), please let me know.
>
>Ross M. Greenberg

I'm offended by you being offended by the rule that only women
are supposed to post in net.women.only!  WHY IN THE !"#$%& DO
YOU REALLY CARE?!  Don't women have enough problems in this limp
society without silly people like you trying to bust up their
discussions?!  Look, wombat breath :-), If you want to start or
or enter a discussion which pertains to women, use net.women.
But as for net.women.only, IT AIN'T BROKE, SO DON'T FIX IT!!

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]