Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ratex.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!ratex!mck
From: mck@ratex.UUCP (Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Inflation in a Free Economy?  (Nota bene, Baba!)
Message-ID: <756@ratex.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Jan-85 19:59:18 EST
Article-I.D.: ratex.756
Posted: Fri Jan 18 19:59:18 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jan-85 04:19:27 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Terran Mystery Poodles
Lines: 117

This is a re-posting; the original vanished mysteriously.

BASIC MONETARY THEORY--

               M*f=nT

In other words: the quantity of money in circulation (M) multiplied by the
frequency with which money changes hands (f) equals the aggregate nominal value
of transactions (nT).  If this is not immediately obvious to you, try looking
at it this way:

               f=nT/M

Next,

               nT=P*T

That is: the aggregate nominal value of transactions (nT) is equal to the price
level (P) multiplied by the real value of transactions (T).  Therefore

               M*f=P*T

(This is called the "transactions version of the quantity equation of money";
the transactions frequency is usually called "velocity", but that is a misnomer
which I choose to avoid.)  From this, we derive

               dM/M + df/f = dP/P + dT/T
or
               dP/P = dM/M + df/f - dT/T

(This is called the "dynamic form of the quantity equation".)  What is tells
us is that a change in the price level is brought about by
       a) a change in the money supply,
       b) a change in the frequency with which money changes hands,
    or c) a change in the aggregate real value of transactions.

REAL LIFE APPLICATION--

     Let's work thru that list backwards:
  c) Historically, real national income has generally grown for the past
several decades, and, with it, T; ceteris paribus, this would lead to a gradual
LOWERING of the price level, but the price level has instead increased.
  b) Transactions frequency increased gradually until recently.  These
increases, which were not enough to offset the increases in T, were brought on
by innovation (the introduction of credit cards, etc) and by expectations of
price increases (the holder of money spends it faster than he would otherwise,
fearing that it will lose value as he holds it).  Recent increases in frequency
have been more dramatic, corresponding to increased expectations of increases
in prices.  Even these more recent increases in f cannot fully account for the
increases in the price level; and, more importantly, they are secondarily
causal (they were themselves brought on by prior increases in P).
     Which brings us to (guess what, guys an' gals): a) the money supply which
has been ever increasing.  How does this come about?
       1) Much as the government loves to tax, it loves to spend even more.
       2) To cover the difference, the Treasury issues securities.
       3) The Federal Reserve Bank buys some or all of these securities.
       4) To pay for these securities, the Fed PRINTS MORE MONEY.
       5) This increase in the monetary base is then amplified by partial
          reserve banking.

INFLATION IN A FREE ECONOMY?--

     Let's go back to our list of the causes of price-level increases, and
again work backwards, this time for the case of a laissez-faire economy:
  c) In the long run, the free economy grows faster than the command economy,
because the free economy can take advantage of an undistorted price system (In
the short-run, socialist governments, if starting with an LDC and having access
to information about prices an production in more-advanced and more market-
oriented economies, can attain high growth-rates by diverting production from
consumption and to further production.  In the long-run, this doesn't last.
But take a course on the economic performance of CPEs, 'cause I don't have time
to go into the hows and wherefores.), and there is a corresponding growth of T.
  b) Transactions frequency would rise only as a result of financial
innovation.  Without prior increases in the price level to trigger expectations
of further increases, the frequency would have an expectations component of
zero; and there would be no increases because...
  a) Legal tender laws would be abolished.  No one could be FORCED to accept
anything as money.  Instead, those attempting to buy would have to present
something which has value without the force of government behind it.  We can
expect that whatever becomes the dominant form of money will also serve as
          the unit of account,
          the standard of deferred payment,
      and the store of value.
This requires that dM/M be approximately equal to
               
               dT/T - df/f

Some Libertarians expect that gold or silver will become the dominant monies.
While I expect that this will be true for an initial period, I, like Hayek,
expect better forms of money to evolve in the long run (but I won't go into
that).

BUT HOW DO WE MAKE THE TRANSITION?--

     Easy!  Take the amount of gold held by the government, divide it by the
quantity of outstanding Federal Reserve Notes, and then back each Federal
Reserve Dollar by that quantity of gold.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     I wrote the above in response to the mocking disbelief with which some
met the claim that there would be no inflation in a Libertarian country.  These
people displayed their wholesale ignorance of economics.  It is incredible that
such people pontificate about something of which they know almost nothing.  And
it's incredible that they choose to be ignorant in the first place, for two
reasons.  First, some understanding of economics is important for an
understanding of the world around us.  Secondly, these people undoubtably vote,
which is to say, they sit in judgment of the individuals and institutions which
make up the economy.  If, for example, Baba were on trial, how would he feel if
most of the jurors SLEPT thru the proceedings?
     Maybe someday I'll explain why the only unemployment in a free economy
would be the frictional component.

                                        Filled with disgust,
                                        Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan
                                        9120 Hawthorn Pt
                                        Westerville, OH  43081-9605