Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!greenber From: greenber@acf4.UUCP (ross m. greenberg) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: In defense of Jeff S. in net.women.o Message-ID: <580006@acf4.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Jan-85 19:13:00 EST Article-I.D.: acf4.580006 Posted: Thu Jan 10 19:13:00 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 13-Jan-85 07:49:47 EST References: <-63700@bunker> Organization: New York University Lines: 32 agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta)===> > Now Ross, your approach doesn't seem to be "Well, we should probably > review this rule." You seem to have the approach that "It's a rule, > it's there, we have to abide by it. It can't be changed." You seem to > have no desire to have any part in the decision of whther the rule stays > or not, but rather just to see that it's enforced. > Sorry, guy, this net has no police force on it. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: I'm not trying to be a police force. Just imagine a one person police force: "Who was that masked man?" "That was the Lone Programmer --- never sleeping in his quest of preserving net.women.only!" "HiHo SeaShell--Abend!" I think the rule in question stinks --- but I will abide by it until it is changed. I don't really know how to go about changing a rule on the net since the net (and its "rules") are so informal. If somebody out there has an idea of how to remove this group (without violating one of the few rules we have here), please let me know. > In this specific > case, there was a discussion ...[but]...the discussion got nowhere, so > I guess the people have the option of trying different means. I agree. But again: don't bust what few laws we have for the sake of one absurdity. ------------------------------------------------------ Ross M. Greenberg @ NYU ----> { allegra,ihnp4 }!cmcl2!acf4!greenber <----