Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site redwood.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!fortune!rhino!redwood!rpw3 From: rpw3@redwood.UUCP (Rob Warnock) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <120@redwood.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 07:36:32 EST Article-I.D.: redwood.120 Posted: Tue Jan 15 07:36:32 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Jan-85 07:55:41 EST References: <5700031@ea.UUCP> <55600003@uo-vax1.UUCP> Organization: [Consultant], Foster City, CA Lines: 23 +--------------- | Nf-ID: #R:ea:5700031:uo-vax1:55600003:37777777600:180 | Nf-From: uo-vax1!bill Jan 9 19:10:00 1985 | | No, many people test ints, chars, etc. For example if i and j equal | 0x01 and 0x02 then i &= j gives i = 0, but i &&= j gives i = 1. | | Mark Aitken | {tektronix, hp-pcd}!uoregon!marka +--------------- Hmmm... K & R [p.46, p.191, & p.215] certainly doesn't list "&&=" as one of the legal operators, and the compiler I use (v.7 derived) doesn't hack it. A local addition, perhaps? Rob Warnock Systems Architecture Consultant UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax!dual}!fortune!redwood!rpw3 DDD: (415)572-2607 USPS: 510 Trinidad Lane, Foster City, CA 94404