Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!duke!crm
From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade anybody
Message-ID: <5260@duke.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 10:39:11 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.5260
Posted: Tue Jan 15 10:39:11 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 01:48:42 EST
References: <4699@tektronix.UUCP> <2758@ncsu.UUCP>, <462@wlcrjs.UUCP>
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.books:1241 net.legal:1317 net.women:4120

Nonsense and or bullshit!

First of all, you are making my choices for me and making my decisions
without asking my permission.  I don't remember asking you to do any
such thing.

Secondly, I have no objections to participating in ``pornographic''
pictures, have written sexually-explicit text which might be considered
pornographic, and don't feel that anyone in my family should be
restricted from doing so, immediately blowing away your "how would you
feel if" arguement.  If I have jealousy problems with someone I love
being involved in a sexual act on or off camera, that is my problem
(and in fact points out that even I can't always live up to my standards
of behavior).  

This whole argument hinges on the idea that you can tell me what
degrades *me*, can tell *me* how I should feel, and then that you should
be able to make decisions for *me* on this basis.   

Forget it.

-- 
		Opinions stated here are my own and are unrelated.

				Charlie Martin
				(...mcnc!duke!crm)