Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.crypt Subject: Re: Analog time-segment voice scramblers-- How Secure? Message-ID: <4966@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Sat, 19-Jan-85 20:21:09 EST Article-I.D.: utzoo.4966 Posted: Sat Jan 19 20:21:09 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jan-85 20:21:09 EST References: <648@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 7 I'm not an expert on this stuff, but my general impression is that no analog scrambler is really considered particularly secure. There is so much redundancy in a voice that it's almost impossible for an analog system to hide it all from would-be eavesdroppers. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry