Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!nsc!srm
From: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade anybody
Message-ID: <2221@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Jan-85 01:13:21 EST
Article-I.D.: nsc.2221
Posted: Thu Jan 17 01:13:21 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Jan-85 01:33:51 EST
References: <4699@tektronix.UUCP> <2758@ncsu.UUCP> <2193@nsc.UUCP> <5249@duke.UUCP>
Reply-To: srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.books:1240 net.legal:1316 net.women:4118
Summary: 

In article <5249@duke.UUCP> crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin) writes:
>
>
>If you think the founding fathers had no "feminist
>sensibilities", read up on them.  In fact, as far as holding slaves,
>there were some pretty strong attempts to eliminate that too, which were
>thwarted in an early play of the "if we can't keep slaves we won't play"
>ploy repeated 4*20+7 years later.
>
Yes, they fought over slavery and they fought over whether to include 
women as equals.  We all know how those fights came out.
-- 
Richard Mateosian
{allegra,cbosgd,decwrl,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm    nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA