Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site desint.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!desint!geoff
From: geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: When radar detectors are illegal!
Message-ID: <307@desint.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 12-Jan-85 06:48:43 EST
Article-I.D.: desint.307
Posted: Sat Jan 12 06:48:43 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Jan-85 01:16:34 EST
References: <448@mhuxt.UUCP> <193@panda.UUCP> <258@enmasse.UUCP> <11551@gatech.UUCP> <603@aluxe.UUCP>
Organization: his home computer, Manhattan Beach, CA
Lines: 16

In article <603@aluxe.UUCP> 2141smh@aluxe.UUCP (henning) writes:

>The laws and State Police are really on our side.

Usually, that is.  You apparently haven't run into some of the state cops I've
met (Massachusetts, for instance).  As for laws, I remember bringing in the
New Year in 1977 with a prolonged sex session.  Hardly a new idea, but it was
a special occasion because everything we did was legal in California for the
first time.  Was it really being "on our side" to prohibit sex in every
position except "missionary?"  For that matter, is it really being "on our
side" to subsidize and protect (with import tariffs) the liquor and tobacco
industries?
-- 

	Geoff Kuenning
	...!ihnp4!trwrb!desint!geoff