Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 larry 2/4/84; site hlwpc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxh!hlexa!hlwpc!cb
From: cb@hlwpc.UUCP (Carl Blesch)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: God and Necessity
Message-ID: <443@hlwpc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Dec-84 14:01:33 EST
Article-I.D.: hlwpc.443
Posted: Tue Dec 18 14:01:33 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 02:43:00 EST
References: <1724@zehntel.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Short Hills, NJ
Lines: 40

>As we mortal humans can create increasingly sound explanations for the
>workings of the universe without having to appeal to the existence of a
>God for those sound explanations, then doesn't God (even if God exists!)
>become increasingly not necessary?
>Steve Nelson

I hope that Christians don't flame at this one.  As a Christian,
I think it's an important idea for us to consider.  It's true that
when the science behind lightning, earthquakes, comets, supernovae, etc.
wasn't too well known, that religious myths grew up around these things.
However, I don't think that God is unnecessary now that we have some
sound scientific explanations.  We can debunk some religious myths,
however.

In my mind, science (including social science) cannot address various
social problems (Christians, substitute the word "sin" here) we have in
this world.  Can it explain how, at this moment, there are various groups
of people at war throughout the world?
Can it explain the growing stockpile of nuclear weapons?  Can it explain
why Ethopians starve to death when, taken as a whole, this world produces
enough food to feed everyone in it?

While Christians believe that God created the physical universe and
is sovergn over it, they also believe that this is just a part of his
realm.  The human condition is another part of it.
To me, at least (I'll stop speaking for other Christians now --
there may be differences of opinion here), the condition of sin as
described in the Bible, from the fall of man in Genesis to the coming
events in Revelation,  fits the world as it has been and is.  God's
way of dealing with it is also described in a way I can buy into.
What I can't buy is the secular humanist view of man constantly improving
*himself* (with or without God, it doesn't matter) to the point where a
*perfect* society will evolve.  For me, the evidence just isn't there.
For example, wasn't World War I called "the war to end all wars"?

For these reasons, God will still be necessary in my belief system,
no matter how technically sophisticated we get [even if we solve
the creation/evolution issue!  :-) ]

Carl Blesch