Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!kel
From: kel@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Socio-economic cancer
Message-ID: <22400071@ea.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 26-Dec-84 10:07:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ea.22400071
Posted: Wed Dec 26 10:07:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Dec-84 02:48:47 EST
References: <739@oliven.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:oliven:-73900:ea:22400071:000:540
Nf-From: ea!kel    Dec 26 09:07:00 1984



I don't think it's 'too bad' that the most likely motivation
for a revolt is taxation.  What a person's pocketbook represents
to him is survival.  Those of us who are in this business
usually make enough to lose recognition of the fact, but
for most people, a tax increase means having to go without.
For computer types, and for the rest of those who may be
categorized as 'labor aristocracy', taxes are a nuisance.
For the people who don't have what they need, tax is the 
difference between an empty cupboard and an empty belly.