Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-lymph!arndt
From: arndt@lymph.DEC
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.flame
Subject: And furthermore . . . [to Ken Wolman]
Message-ID: <12@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 10:31:43 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.12
Posted: Mon Dec 17 10:31:43 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Dec-84 07:12:39 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.religion:5138 net.flame:7271

You say, "Allowing the works of others to do his arguing for him . . ."
objecting to my use of quotes in a line of argument.  Then you seem to support
the "preserving [of] the moral vitality of what remains of the Judaeo-Christian
ethic".

My question:  What is wrong with using quotes from people who make sense in
ANY topic of argument???  Does that mean that I now cannot quote YOU???

Rich Rosen made the same objection.  It's pure merde!  I'm not shy about quoting
someone else if I think they have made a clear statement that bears on the topic.  Why should you be?  

Can't you refer to the Judaeo-Christian writings and tradition in defense of it?

I think you have both feet in your mouth on everything you said.  So there.

Go back to sleep.  Better yet wake up!

Keep chargin'

Ken Arndt