Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!wjh12!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie )
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.games.trivia
Subject: Re: Time between movies and sequels
Message-ID: <6613@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 11:04:32 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6613
Posted: Mon Dec 17 11:04:32 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Dec-84 07:06:09 EST
References: <2179@garfield.UUCP> <3768@ucbvax.ARPA> <3302@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.movies:5264 net.games.trivia:1475

> Well, a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz" was being made this past year.
> It is a real sequel, not a remake.
> -- 
>     Barry Margolin
>     ARPA: barmar@MIT-Multics
>     UUCP: ..!genrad!mit-eddie!barmar

Return to OZ is not a Sequel to the "The Wizard of OZ" that has Judy
Garland in it.  Return to OZ distinguishes itself in that it tries to
be an accurate reproduction of the story in Baum's book, rather than
a made over for Hollywood musical like its predecessor.  The technology
necessary to make a lot of what happens (like making the characters
actually look like the illustrations in the book) is fairly recent
stuff.

-Ron