Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot From: chabot@amber.DEC (l s chabot) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: _Ms._ Magazine Advertisements Message-ID: <267@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 11:58:56 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.267 Posted: Fri Dec 14 11:58:56 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 17-Dec-84 03:17:09 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 15 It's been oh six years since I picked up a _Ms._ magazine, but I did last month and noticed the same thing Jym reported. Except I didn't count and my impression was that it was higher, and I decided not to subscribe: I just felt that there was too much emphasis on feeling-good-about-yourself==looking-good, and what I'd remembered fondly, and perhaps mistakenly, was rather an emphasis more along the lines of feeling-good-about-yourself==awareness-and-control-of- health-and-self. Any body out there been reading it for a long time? Has it changed? Or is it me, as I suspect. Disappointed, L S Chabot UUCP: ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot ARPA: ...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA