Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watarts.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watarts!kevyn From: kevyn@watarts.UUCP (Thompson) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: liberal news media Message-ID: <8178@watarts.UUCP> Date: Sat, 15-Dec-84 16:59:05 EST Article-I.D.: watarts.8178 Posted: Sat Dec 15 16:59:05 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Dec-84 04:02:56 EST References: <281@amdcad.UUCP> <624@pucc-k> <163@gcc-opus.ARPA> Distribution: net Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 56 > Let's look at the facts. A Union Carbide fertilizer plant in India has a > major chemical leak. The result, a couple of thousand Indians die. OK, > maybe 2500, I won't quibble! Sure this looks bad, but think about it. > < ... > > This was a fertilizer plant. Now, since it is a fertilizer plant in India, > where do you think most of the fertilizer goes? That's right, India! Now, what > do you use fertilizer for? (I have to go slow for the liberals. I have a > bumper sticker on my Z, it says 'Warning, I brake for liberals') That's right, > to grow food! Now, what's the biggest cause of death in India? Hey, three > times straight, you got it, malnutrition! > > So think about it. Here is this fertilizer plant which is probably saving > millions of Indians anually... > Now, what are you liberals going to do? Close the plant? Drive Union Carbide > to bankruptcy? This is the same sort of fuzzy headed liberal thinking that > invariably leads liberals to shoot (or tax, or regulate, or sue, or protest, > or boycott, or anything else handy) the hand that feeds them! > > And then we get those Liberals (making asses of themselves ...) complaining > that Union Carbide is just putting their plant in India so they won't have US > regulatory agencies to contend with... > You think those morons in the EPA would have made a difference? All > they would have checked is whether there was a filter between the crappers and > the river! And where WOULD you rather have the leak, in India or in your > back yard? ... > > > Tom "Liberal", in Tom's posting, is used with reckless abandon; (I mean "liberal" beginning in lower-case, although I see a "Liberal" there as well. Surely it was just a typo? :-) The use of such worn-out and mean- ingless terms as "fuzzy-headed liberal thinking", which has been all too plentiful in recent months, is very tiresome. I thought net.flame had gotten over the "Re: Re: Fuzzy-headed liberals" fad. There is no reason at all to make such sweeping generalizations about a very ambiguously defined body of people named "liberals", so why start name-calling? Thousands of people have died from the immediate effects of the chem- icals which escaped. Many thousands more are injured permanently and I imagine that, due to the nature of the chemicals, still-births and deform- aties will become normal in that area for a long time. These deaths and sicknesses are NOT a sacrifice which becomes relatively meaningless in view of the fact that the plant may have produced fertilizer to "save millions of Indiansanually". The Union Carbide plant is there to make money, above all else. WESTERN money, that is. About the above article in particular: 'nuff said. I'm sure creative netters will either flame the hell out of it or write a few short lines of quiet praise. ========================================================================= Kevyn Collins-Thompson University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, CANADA !! ....{allegra|clyde|utzoo|ihnp4|decvax}!watmath!watarts!kevyn ========================================================================= "Where WOULD you rather have the leak, in India or your back yard?"