Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site masscomp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!masscomp!carlton
From: carlton@masscomp.UUCP (Carlton Hommel)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Blatant Commercialism in 2010
Message-ID: <181@masscomp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Dec-84 11:13:26 EST
Article-I.D.: masscomp.181
Posted: Tue Dec 25 11:13:26 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Dec-84 01:58:59 EST
References: <567@voder.UUCP> <6703@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Reply-To: carlton@masscomp.UUCP (Carlton Hommel)
Organization: Masscomp - Westford, MA
Lines: 15
Keywords: 2001 sequels
Summary: 

In article <6703@brl-tgr.ARPA> wmartin@brl-tgr.ARPA (Will Martin ) writes:
>I always did think that "2001" was far too near a date to use; I vote
>for 2051 or 2071 for the new edition. (:-) Anybody have any better
>or more rigorous reasoning for a realistic date?
>
Sure.  How about the following set of sequels?
	 2001 - A Space Odyessy
	 2010 - Odyessy Two
	 2100 - Odyessy Three
	 3000 - Odyessy Four
	12000 - Homer Rolls Over in His Grave

Wife:  I'm tired of being dragged to all these boring SF movies!
Husband:  You're right; lets go see a boring Dudley Moore movie.