Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site tove.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!umcp-cs!tove!mark From: mark@tove.UUCP (Mark Weiser) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: Csh confusion: #define HZ 100? Message-ID: <71@tove.UUCP> Date: Sat, 15-Dec-84 17:33:35 EST Article-I.D.: tove.71 Posted: Sat Dec 15 17:33:35 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 03:25:53 EST References: <6564@brl-tgr.ARPA> <95@redwood.UUCP> Reply-To: mark@tove.UUCP (Mark Weiser) Organization: U of Maryland, Laboratory for Parallel Computation, C.P., MD Lines: 12 Summary: You who have done this, and those who are good guessers: suppose I just reached into my kernel source and #define HZ N, for some random N. Would anything break or give bad results (other than profil, which does anyway, which started the whole discussion...)? It seems to me that N=20 (50ms resolution) is plenty for our Vax 780 and will save a little overhead. -- Spoken: Mark Weiser ARPA: mark@maryland Phone: (301) 454-7817 CSNet: mark@umcp-cs UUCP: {seismo,allegra}!umcp-cs!mark USPS: Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742