Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!harvard!talcott!wjh12!foxvax1!brunix!jss
From: jss@brunix.UUCP (Judith Schrier)
Newsgroups: net.women.only
Subject: Re: "Primitive" feminists get theirs in!?
Message-ID: <11185@brunix.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Dec-84 20:07:11 EST
Article-I.D.: brunix.11185
Posted: Wed Dec 12 20:07:11 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Dec-84 02:46:11 EST
References: decwrl.178
Lines: 10


Sorry, Ken, but I think Rosebury has misinterpreted that "disgusting test".
In some cultures, urine simply is not considered a disgusting substance. It
has various uses. A friend of mine did a senior honors thesis some years ago
in anthropology on the uses of urine in various cultures. I don't remember
many, but hair dressing is one. Recall that former Prime Minister Desai of
India drank some of his own urine each morning, as a health measure.

judith
brunix!jss