Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot From: chabot@amber.DEC (L 'S' Chabot) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Big Breasts Message-ID: <238@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 13-Dec-84 09:24:30 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.238 Posted: Thu Dec 13 09:24:30 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 01:40:24 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 21 Some of you should go out and read some biology and some physiology and some social history. First off, the area of eye-catching sexual attraction of women for men used to be the hips. It's been centuries climbing up the bod. I have no idea if this means in the fair future men will look for seductive earlobes or what. Second, breast size does not reflect on milk-production. Yes, dairy cows have large udders--that's because they produce milk all the time. When it's time for human women to have milk for babies, the breasts get larger to take care of this function. Large breasts to not mean lots of nature's milk factories--they most often mean tissue like fat and muscle. Small busted women do not have undernourished babies. This theorizing about standards of beauty having roots in genetics is ludicrous. L S Chabot UUCP: ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot ARPA: ...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA USFail: DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA 01752 shadow: [ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]