Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!geoffs
From: geoffs@brl-tgr.ARPA (Geoffrey Sauerborn )
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.movies.sw,net.sf-lovers,net.flame
Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal
Message-ID: <6719@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 10:46:18 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6719
Posted: Fri Dec 21 10:46:18 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Dec-84 00:17:50 EST
References: <2481@ucla-cs.ARPA> <1605@drutx.UUCP> <383@hou2e.UUCP> <393@klipper.UUCP> <24@epsilon.UUCP>
Reply-To: geoffs@brl-tgr.ARPA (Geoffrey Sauerborn (TANK) )
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 53
Keywords: dfslkfl; -- (AND NOT! -> "DfXlkfl;:" !!!!)
Xref: watmath net.movies:5319 net.movies.sw:513 net.sf-lovers:5427 net.flame:7348
Summary: 

In article <24@epsilon.UUCP> you write:
>In article <393@klipper.UUCP> biep writes:
>>>> From: schu@drutx.UUCP (SchulteSM)
>>>> Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> q
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> w
>>>> .
>>>> dfslkfl;
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> lkfdg
>>>> ;lfdkg;lka;dlgk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ZZ
>>>> agkfjlkadfgkj
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, I agree. This is definately a proposal worth considering.
>>>
>>
>>No, no, no!!!
>>I know, it sounds nice, but believe me, it just doesn't work. 
>>Someone over here brought this up on our local network, and we've
>>been discussing it over and again, and indeed, it sounds appealing,
>>but when you work out the details you'll find lots of inconsistencies
>>and problems. Don't try to reinvent the wheel, there are already
>>enough other proposals on this net which ask for our attention.
>>
>Well, we've actually done it here, and it works out just fine. Of course,
>we had to make certain minor changes like "DfXlkfl;:" instead of
>"dfslkfl;" as was indicated in the original article. You'll note that
>otherwise a contradiction arises when "ZZ" is implemented.
>
>						Ed Sheppard
>						Bell Communications Research


	Alright! I'm sick of this! Why is it that every time someone
puts a good piece into public domain, somebody has to good and change
the source! The next thing to happen it some BO-ZO will try to use
this changed version without taking the time to read the documentation -
and naturally the FOOL starts flaming to the original poster!!!!

	
                                         Geoff Sauerborn