Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: 4->8->16->32->64? bit micros
Message-ID: <426@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 02:59:03 EST
Article-I.D.: amdcad.426
Posted: Fri Dec 21 02:59:03 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 00:41:27 EST
References:  <280@oakhill.UUCP> <466@intelca.UUCP> <18341@lanl.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: AMDCAD, Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 13

> be no 64 bit micros, but they are likely to be bit-sliced machines.

There is no such thing as a "bit sliced machine". There are bit slice
devices and bit slice machines but no bit sliced machines.

A good example of a bit slice device is the Am2901C Four-Bit Bipolar
Microprocessor Slice.
-- 
 This could very well represent my opinion and AMD's.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5790
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA