Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site CSL-Vax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!CSL-Vax!pallas
From: pallas@CSL-Vax.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: 2010 mistakes/non-mistakes
Message-ID: <2456@CSL-Vax.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 28-Dec-84 12:31:45 EST
Article-I.D.: CSL-Vax.2456
Posted: Fri Dec 28 12:31:45 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Dec-84 23:00:52 EST
References: <1575@qubix.UUCP> <289@wjvax.UUCP>
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 8

> Mark Callow mentioned that there is a difference between
> 'zero gravity' and 'free fall'.  I give up.  What is it?

Zero g == zero gravities == no acceleration == free fall

"Zero gravity" is meaningless, because gravity obeys the inverse-square law,
and is not blocked by anything.  Hence, everywhere in the universe there is
some gravitational influence.