Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site eosp1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!eosp1!robison From: robison@eosp1.UUCP (Tobias D. Robison) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: San Francisco Menorah Controversy Message-ID: <1306@eosp1.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Dec-84 09:08:02 EST Article-I.D.: eosp1.1306 Posted: Thu Dec 20 09:08:02 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Dec-84 02:10:16 EST References: <291@mhuxm.UUCP> <217@lsuc.UUCP> Reply-To: robison@eosp1.UUCP (Tobias D. Robison) Distribution: net Organization: Exxon Office Systems, Princeton Lines: 9 Summary: Even though the Menorah is not a symbol of missionary zeal, and does not "threaten" non-Jews, it need not be constructed on Governemnt land with government support. Surely there is privately owned land visible from the bridge upon which the menorah can be constructed with private money. Why does the secular governemnt have to be involved? - Toby Robison (not Robinson!) {allegra, decvax!ittvax, fisher, princeton}!eosp1!robison