Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site masscomp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!masscomp!lip From: lip@masscomp.UUCP (John Lipinski) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Where do souls come from? Message-ID: <176@masscomp.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 09:03:56 EST Article-I.D.: masscomp.176 Posted: Fri Dec 14 09:03:56 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 02:09:09 EST References: <675@ames.UUCP> <1007@aecom.UUCP> Reply-To: lip@masscomp.UUCP (John Lipinski) Distribution: net Organization: Masscomp - Westford, MA Lines: 21 Summary: In article <1007@aecom.UUCP> berger@aecom.UUCP (Mitchell Berger) writes: >Space and time are the limits of the physical universe. Without >a body as a referance point, how can the consept of time exist >for the soul? >Think of it this way... If you can understand the fact that a soul >has no location in space, why should it have one in time? > > michab Well, if the soul has no location in time and space, what evidence do you have that it exists? All evidence depends on stimuli from time and space. If you say that no evidence is needed and that faith only is sufficient for a belief in a soul, then you are defending the position of blind faith. Do you really think it is wise to believe in something if there is no evidence to suggest that it is true or that it exists? If you do, then when I tell you that the true god is called Fred, then you are committed to believing me. - John Lipinski