Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!harvard!talcott!wjh12!foxvax1!brunix!jss From: jss@brunix.UUCP (Judith Schrier) Newsgroups: net.women.only Subject: Re: "Primitive" feminists get theirs in!? Message-ID: <11185@brunix.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Dec-84 20:07:11 EST Article-I.D.: brunix.11185 Posted: Wed Dec 12 20:07:11 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Dec-84 02:46:11 EST References: decwrl.178 Lines: 10 Sorry, Ken, but I think Rosebury has misinterpreted that "disgusting test". In some cultures, urine simply is not considered a disgusting substance. It has various uses. A friend of mine did a senior honors thesis some years ago in anthropology on the uses of urine in various cultures. I don't remember many, but hair dressing is one. Recall that former Prime Minister Desai of India drank some of his own urine each morning, as a health measure. judith brunix!jss