Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!tron
From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Equipment Check
Message-ID: <843@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Dec-84 16:21:05 EST
Article-I.D.: vax1.843
Posted: Wed Dec 19 16:21:05 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Dec-84 02:27:36 EST
References: <798@pucc-i> <10403@watmath.UUCP> <434@gitpyr.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 23

> 
> Since the pleasure a woman experiences during "conventional" sex is
> directly related to clitoral stimulation, it seems to me that length
> is not the important size factor in the male anatomy.  I would think
> that circumference would be the determining measurement.  Thoughts?
> 

I believe the statement "pleasure...directly related to clitoral stimulation"
to be extremely shortsighted.  The pleasure I experience during "conventional"
(is there another type?) sex is not directly related to friction, fit, or
orgasm and I strongly suspect the a woman's response is similarly unlimited.

I could also mention the infamous G spot but defining pleasure as stimulation
of body parts is too limiting for me.

Peter Barbee

decvax-+-uw-beaver-+
ihnp4--+   allegra-+
ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron
	       sun-+
	   ssc-vax-+
: