Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (L 'S' Chabot)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Big Breasts
Message-ID: <238@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Dec-84 09:24:30 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.238
Posted: Thu Dec 13 09:24:30 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 01:40:24 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 21

Some of you should go out and read some biology and some physiology and some
social history.

First off, the area of eye-catching sexual attraction of women for men used to
be the hips.  It's been centuries climbing up the bod.  I have no idea if this
means in the fair future men will look for seductive earlobes or what.

Second, breast size does not reflect on milk-production.  Yes, dairy cows have
large udders--that's because they produce milk all the time.  When it's time
for human women to have milk for babies, the breasts get larger to take care of
this function.  Large breasts to not mean lots of nature's milk factories--they
most often mean tissue like fat and muscle.  Small busted women do not have
undernourished babies.

This theorizing about standards of beauty having roots in genetics is ludicrous.

L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA  01752
shadow:	[ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]