Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Re: Re: BITNET nodes as of Dec, 03 1984 Message-ID: <608@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Dec-84 22:33:41 EST Article-I.D.: cbosgd.608 Posted: Wed Dec 26 22:33:41 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 27-Dec-84 03:46:22 EST References: <54@adrvax.UUCP> <722@pucc-k> <115@v1.UUCP> Organization: Bell Labs, Columbus Lines: 17 In article <115@v1.UUCP> josh@v1.UUCP (Josh Knight) writes: >> -) so far (my experience here) the best gateway from >> internet<-->BITNET is wiscvm.ARPA. >I believe ucbvax.UUCP is also a reasonable gateway to BITNET. However, I >should defer to Mark Horton on this. I use ucbvax.UUCP as gateway to BITNET, but each host should choose the nearest one that works reliably and is legal for them. If you are on UUCP and you send data to BITNET via ARPANET, you're illegally using the ARPANET as an intermediate network. There is also a gateway at psuvax1.UUCP, but it has never worked for me. (I may be using it wrong.) I've never tried wiscvm.ARPA, I suppose that wiscvm.ARPA is intended as a gateway between CSNET and BITNET, not for UUCP use. Mark