Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site looking.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!looking!brad
From: brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.women
Subject: The Anti-porn ordinance IS pornography (You'll enjoy this)
Message-ID: <238@looking.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 00:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: looking.238
Posted: Fri Dec 21 00:00:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 01:29:46 EST
References: <249@ahuta.UUCP>
Organization: Looking Glass Software, Waterloo, Ont
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.legal:1132 net.women:3864

That ordinance has got to be one of the sickest, most vile things
I have ever read.

I think that this ordinance, because it states that adult women, found
to be in full possesion of their faculties, are not empowered with
the capacity to contract, WHILE MEN ARE.

It states explicitly in that ordinance that a woman's contract to engage
in a pornographic photo session can in now way be enforced.  The men
involved in the session, however, are deemed fully capapble of entering
into the contracts.   Thus we see that in a matter of sexually explicit
material, women are demeaned to the status of children, while men are not.

Thus this act is pornography, and its printing, display and distribution
should be immediately banned upon its passing, which will hopefully be
a cold day in hell.
-- 
Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software Ltd. - Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473