Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site tove.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!umcp-cs!tove!mark
From: mark@tove.UUCP (Mark Weiser)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Csh confusion: #define HZ 100?
Message-ID: <71@tove.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 15-Dec-84 17:33:35 EST
Article-I.D.: tove.71
Posted: Sat Dec 15 17:33:35 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 03:25:53 EST
References: <6564@brl-tgr.ARPA> <95@redwood.UUCP>
Reply-To: mark@tove.UUCP (Mark Weiser)
Organization: U of Maryland, Laboratory for Parallel Computation, C.P., MD
Lines: 12
Summary: 

You who have done this, and those who are good guessers:  suppose
I just reached into my kernel source and #define HZ N, for
some random N.  Would anything break or give bad results (other
than profil, which does anyway, which started the whole discussion...)?

It seems to me that N=20 (50ms resolution) is plenty for our Vax 780
and will save a little overhead.
-- 
Spoken: Mark Weiser 	ARPA:	mark@maryland	Phone: (301) 454-7817
CSNet:	mark@umcp-cs 	UUCP:	{seismo,allegra}!umcp-cs!mark
USPS: Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742