Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: 4->8->16->32->64? bit micros Message-ID: <426@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 02:59:03 EST Article-I.D.: amdcad.426 Posted: Fri Dec 21 02:59:03 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 00:41:27 EST References:<280@oakhill.UUCP> <466@intelca.UUCP> <18341@lanl.ARPA> Distribution: net Organization: AMDCAD, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 13 > be no 64 bit micros, but they are likely to be bit-sliced machines. There is no such thing as a "bit sliced machine". There are bit slice devices and bit slice machines but no bit sliced machines. A good example of a bit slice device is the Am2901C Four-Bit Bipolar Microprocessor Slice. -- This could very well represent my opinion and AMD's. Phil Ngai (408) 749-5790 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA