Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!beth
From: beth@umcp-cs.UUCP (Beth Katz)
Newsgroups: net.college
Subject: Re: THE game - TEXAS-OU (ESAD Texans)
Message-ID: <1899@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 18:56:06 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1899
Posted: Fri Dec 14 18:56:06 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Dec-84 05:23:28 EST
References: <6433@yale.UUCP> <12500006@uokvax.UUCP> <1019@druri.UUCP> <356@busch.UUCP> <1021@druri.UUCP> <357@busch.UUCP>
Reply-To: beth@maryland.UUCP (Beth Katz)
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 17
Summary: 

In article <357@busch.UUCP> dcm@busch.UUCP (Craig Miller) writes:
>[ <1021@druri.UUCP> dht@druri.UUCP (Davis Tucker) ]:
>> If only Oklahoma wouldn't let Texans in... what would Barry Switzer
>> do for a starting football team?
>	I'd have to agree here... (even though it hurts to agree with
>	this Texan...)  Then again, why are all those dumb Texans
>	playing for OU rather that UT?  Says something for UT, doesn'tit?

It seems to me that this is a double-edged sword.  Maybe the OU Texans did
not want to go to UT for various reasons.  Or maybe UT didn't think they
were good enough.  Maybe I don't know what ESAD means in the subject line.

Craig and Davis:  Don't try to apply logic to this.  We're having fun.

Beth:	Okay, fine!  Could you guys at least cheer for Maryland in the Sun
	Bowl.  The team has looked great this week as I've stared out my
	office window onto the practice field.  GO TERPS.