Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!ix269
From: ix269@sdcc6.UUCP (Jim)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re:Re: Big Breasts (BIG (someone was angry?))
Message-ID: <1842@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 22-Dec-84 06:35:05 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1842
Posted: Sat Dec 22 06:35:05 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Dec-84 08:13:33 EST
References: <798@pucc-i> <10403@watmath.UUCP>
Reply-To: ix269@sdcc6.UUCP (Jim)
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 22
Summary: 

BIG BREASTS. BIG OUTSIZED ANYTHING OR EXCEPTIONALLY SKINNY/BRAWNY, ETC!!!

Pardon folks, but .

Not everyone persues the perfect image.  I do not insist that I am
the norm within these thoughts, but that there are aspects to consider
*here*.  Physical appearance is no mere thing.  Yes, within a strong 
enough love, you could love someone who is brutally ugly, but getting
to know them might not ever happen.  *I* do not advocate this worship of
perfection.  *I* do not scorn beauty, *I* do appreciate all that *I*
perceive.  Yes I marvel at 38 DD, but it is no way sexual, more in
wonder at the modern engineering which allows *her* to jog without
screaming.  *Most* people are of ``average'' appearance in some way,
that is why average is.  It is unfortunate for those who can not find
the beauty in each and every thing.  (cliche'? pardon.).  Tunnelvision
directed at one aspect of a man/woman(either order) *is* running people
into a wall without their realizing it.  Somebody completely wonderful
could walk right by *you*, and because there breasts/muscles/shirts/pants
weren't bulging in some preferred way, you lose.  Enough said.
	The original article written by a 'gent seemed merely a query,
but the reply (another Name that passed by) was a bit vehement (or is that
p*ssed).  It is to the less curious that this reply is worded.