Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!mark
From: mark@digi-g.UUCP (Mark Mendel)
Newsgroups: net.college,net.flame
Subject: Re: "Universities need not verify draft status of students . . ."
Message-ID: <435@digi-g.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 13:51:48 EST
Article-I.D.: digi-g.435
Posted: Mon Dec 17 13:51:48 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 02:43:43 EST
References: <577@pucc-k> <147@panda.UUCP> <247@ssc-vax.UUCP> <371@amdcad.UUCP>
Reply-To: mark@digi-g.UUCP (mark)
Distribution: net
Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.college:569 net.flame:7343
Summary: 

In article <371@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes:
>> that women
>> would be raped if they became POWs (whereas, we all know that male POWs 
>> play bridge and drink Kahlua & cream while in captivity).
>> 					-- Mark A.
>
>Yeah, I know a woman who claims to be a feminist but doesn't want to
>get drafted for the above reason.
>
>I find it impossible to take her seriously. Can you say "rights without
>responsibilities"? Sure you can.

No one (except myself) can foist upon me a "responsibilty" to be party
to killing people.  Sorry.

Those I know, however, that have, tend to suffer pyschological damage quite
comprable to being raped.