Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site masscomp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!masscomp!carlton From: carlton@masscomp.UUCP (Carlton Hommel) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Blatant Commercialism in 2010 Message-ID: <181@masscomp.UUCP> Date: Tue, 25-Dec-84 11:13:26 EST Article-I.D.: masscomp.181 Posted: Tue Dec 25 11:13:26 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Dec-84 01:58:59 EST References: <567@voder.UUCP> <6703@brl-tgr.ARPA> Reply-To: carlton@masscomp.UUCP (Carlton Hommel) Organization: Masscomp - Westford, MA Lines: 15 Keywords: 2001 sequels Summary: In article <6703@brl-tgr.ARPA> wmartin@brl-tgr.ARPA (Will Martin ) writes: >I always did think that "2001" was far too near a date to use; I vote >for 2051 or 2071 for the new edition. (:-) Anybody have any better >or more rigorous reasoning for a realistic date? > Sure. How about the following set of sequels? 2001 - A Space Odyessy 2010 - Odyessy Two 2100 - Odyessy Three 3000 - Odyessy Four 12000 - Homer Rolls Over in His Grave Wife: I'm tired of being dragged to all these boring SF movies! Husband: You're right; lets go see a boring Dudley Moore movie.