Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou5g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5g!pgf
From: pgf@hou5g.UUCP (Paul Fox)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women
Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance
Message-ID: <480@hou5g.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 11:31:07 EST
Article-I.D.: hou5g.480
Posted: Fri Dec 21 11:31:07 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 02:29:39 EST
References: <249@ahuta.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.books:1116 net.movies:5310 net.legal:1133 net.women:3869

a
Has this ordinance been passed, or is it just proposed?  If it's proposed,
I doubt its chances of passing.  If it has passed, then I doubt its chances
of lasting, in the face of the money and power behind pornography.  The 
language is, as you say, awfully strong for an ordinance, but I must say I
approve of the sentiment of the content.

				Paul Fox, AT&T Information Systems 
				  Laboratories, Holmdel NJ.
				  [ihnp4|vax135]!hou5g!pgf