Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!sjuvax!bbanerje From: bbanerje@sjuvax.UUCP (B. Banerjee) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: net.wanted.sources??? Message-ID: <735@sjuvax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 00:58:39 EST Article-I.D.: sjuvax.735 Posted: Fri Dec 14 00:58:39 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 00:27:30 EST Distribution: net Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa. Lines: 27 I'm sure I missed the boat on this one. I'm really backlogged as far as my news reading is concerned, and I probably missed the discussion on the creation of this group (unless it was one of the unilaterally created ones). HOWEVER!! Shouldn't this group have been named net.sources.wanted?? I usually try and keep abreast of certain groups (among them - net.sources) via something of the form... % vnews -n net.sources This will get me net.sources, and net.sources.bugs, but NOT net.wanted.sources. While reading the backlog of news, I found a large number of requests in net.wanted.sources . In about, 5 cases, I had the sources requested, but hesitated in replying due to the time that had expired since the posting. Perhaps, it is possible to rename the group (No, I DONT intend to do it myself). What do all of you think? Regards, -- Binayak Banerjee {allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!bbanerje P.S. Send Flames, I love mail.