Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (l s chabot)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: _Ms._ Magazine Advertisements
Message-ID: <267@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 11:58:56 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.267
Posted: Fri Dec 14 11:58:56 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 17-Dec-84 03:17:09 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 15

It's been oh six years since I picked up a _Ms._ magazine, but I did last month
and noticed the same thing Jym reported.  Except I didn't count and my 
impression was that it was higher, and I decided not to subscribe: I just felt
that there was too much emphasis on feeling-good-about-yourself==looking-good,
and what I'd remembered fondly, and perhaps mistakenly, was rather an emphasis
more along the lines of feeling-good-about-yourself==awareness-and-control-of-
health-and-self.  

Any body out there been reading it for a long time?  Has it changed?  Or is it
me, as I suspect.

Disappointed,
L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA