Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!ix269 From: ix269@sdcc6.UUCP (Jim) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re:Re: Big Breasts (BIG (someone was angry?)) Message-ID: <1842@sdcc6.UUCP> Date: Sat, 22-Dec-84 06:35:05 EST Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1842 Posted: Sat Dec 22 06:35:05 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 23-Dec-84 08:13:33 EST References: <798@pucc-i> <10403@watmath.UUCP> Reply-To: ix269@sdcc6.UUCP (Jim) Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center Lines: 22 Summary: BIG BREASTS. BIG OUTSIZED ANYTHING OR EXCEPTIONALLY SKINNY/BRAWNY, ETC!!! Pardon folks, but. Not everyone persues the perfect image. I do not insist that I am the norm within these thoughts, but that there are aspects to consider *here*. Physical appearance is no mere thing. Yes, within a strong enough love, you could love someone who is brutally ugly, but getting to know them might not ever happen. *I* do not advocate this worship of perfection. *I* do not scorn beauty, *I* do appreciate all that *I* perceive. Yes I marvel at 38 DD, but it is no way sexual, more in wonder at the modern engineering which allows *her* to jog without screaming. *Most* people are of ``average'' appearance in some way, that is why average is. It is unfortunate for those who can not find the beauty in each and every thing. (cliche'? pardon.). Tunnelvision directed at one aspect of a man/woman(either order) *is* running people into a wall without their realizing it. Somebody completely wonderful could walk right by *you*, and because there breasts/muscles/shirts/pants weren't bulging in some preferred way, you lose. Enough said. The original article written by a 'gent seemed merely a query, but the reply (another Name that passed by) was a bit vehement (or is that p*ssed). It is to the less curious that this reply is worded.