Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site masscomp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!masscomp!lip
From: lip@masscomp.UUCP (John Lipinski)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Where do souls come from?
Message-ID: <176@masscomp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 09:03:56 EST
Article-I.D.: masscomp.176
Posted: Fri Dec 14 09:03:56 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 02:09:09 EST
References: <675@ames.UUCP> <1007@aecom.UUCP>
Reply-To: lip@masscomp.UUCP (John Lipinski)
Distribution: net
Organization: Masscomp - Westford, MA
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <1007@aecom.UUCP> berger@aecom.UUCP (Mitchell Berger) writes:
>Space and time are the limits of the physical universe. Without
>a body as a referance point, how can the consept of time exist 
>for the soul?
>Think of it this way... If you can understand the fact that a soul
>has no location in space, why should it have one in time?
>
>                      michab 


Well, if the soul has no location in time and space, what evidence do
you have that it exists?  All evidence depends on stimuli from time and
space.  If you say that no evidence is needed and that faith only is
sufficient for a belief in a soul, then you are defending the position
of blind faith.  Do you really think it is wise to believe in something
if there is no evidence to suggest that it is true or that it exists?
If you do, then when I tell you that the true god is called Fred,
then you are committed to believing me.


		- John Lipinski