Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!tron
From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: net.singles vs. net.women
Message-ID: <839@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 17:36:42 EST
Article-I.D.: vax1.839
Posted: Mon Dec 17 17:36:42 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 02:34:15 EST
References: <3171@alice.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 21

> Let's try to see some 
> 
> ***P*O*S*I*T*I*V*E***
> 
> comments in net.singles.  All the sarcasm, belittling, chauvinism (of all
> kinds and gender/sexes), ad-hominem attacks, continual disparagement
> of both male and female fears, and the like are really good only for
> /dev/null UNLESS you have some CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions.  It's easy to

I agree with Tom's desire for positive and constructive discussions.  My
suggestion is that if the point of your article is to tell someone you
think they're wrong, you send them mail.  Use the net to aplaud or discuss.

Peter Barbee

decvax-+-uw-beaver-+
ihnp4--+   allegra-+
ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron
	       sun-+
	   ssc-vax-+
: