Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!tron From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Equipment Check Message-ID: <843@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Dec-84 16:21:05 EST Article-I.D.: vax1.843 Posted: Wed Dec 19 16:21:05 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Dec-84 02:27:36 EST References: <798@pucc-i> <10403@watmath.UUCP> <434@gitpyr.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 23 > > Since the pleasure a woman experiences during "conventional" sex is > directly related to clitoral stimulation, it seems to me that length > is not the important size factor in the male anatomy. I would think > that circumference would be the determining measurement. Thoughts? > I believe the statement "pleasure...directly related to clitoral stimulation" to be extremely shortsighted. The pleasure I experience during "conventional" (is there another type?) sex is not directly related to friction, fit, or orgasm and I strongly suspect the a woman's response is similarly unlimited. I could also mention the infamous G spot but defining pleasure as stimulation of body parts is too limiting for me. Peter Barbee decvax-+-uw-beaver-+ ihnp4--+ allegra-+ ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron sun-+ ssc-vax-+ :