Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!sjuvax!bbanerje
From: bbanerje@sjuvax.UUCP (B. Banerjee)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: net.wanted.sources???
Message-ID: <735@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 00:58:39 EST
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.735
Posted: Fri Dec 14 00:58:39 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 00:27:30 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa.
Lines: 27

I'm sure I missed the boat on this one.  I'm really backlogged as far
as my news reading is concerned, and I probably missed the discussion
on the creation of this group (unless it was one of the unilaterally
created ones).  HOWEVER!! Shouldn't this group have been named
net.sources.wanted??

I usually try and keep abreast of certain groups (among them -
net.sources) via something of the form...

% vnews -n net.sources

This will get me net.sources, and net.sources.bugs, but NOT
net.wanted.sources.  While reading the backlog of news, I found a large
number of requests in net.wanted.sources .  In about, 5 cases, I had
the sources requested, but hesitated in replying due to the time that
had expired since the posting.

Perhaps, it is possible to rename the group (No, I DONT intend to do it
myself).  What do all of you think?

Regards,

-- 
				Binayak Banerjee
		{allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!bbanerje
P.S.
	Send Flames, I love mail.