Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou5g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5g!pgf From: pgf@hou5g.UUCP (Paul Fox) Newsgroups: net.books,net.movies,net.legal,net.women Subject: Re: Anti-porn ordinance Message-ID: <480@hou5g.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 11:31:07 EST Article-I.D.: hou5g.480 Posted: Fri Dec 21 11:31:07 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 02:29:39 EST References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ Lines: 10 Xref: watmath net.books:1116 net.movies:5310 net.legal:1133 net.women:3869 a Has this ordinance been passed, or is it just proposed? If it's proposed, I doubt its chances of passing. If it has passed, then I doubt its chances of lasting, in the face of the money and power behind pornography. The language is, as you say, awfully strong for an ordinance, but I must say I approve of the sentiment of the content. Paul Fox, AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel NJ. [ihnp4|vax135]!hou5g!pgf