Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!beth From: beth@umcp-cs.UUCP (Beth Katz) Newsgroups: net.college Subject: Re: THE game - TEXAS-OU (ESAD Texans) Message-ID: <1899@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 18:56:06 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1899 Posted: Fri Dec 14 18:56:06 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Dec-84 05:23:28 EST References: <6433@yale.UUCP> <12500006@uokvax.UUCP> <1019@druri.UUCP> <356@busch.UUCP> <1021@druri.UUCP> <357@busch.UUCP> Reply-To: beth@maryland.UUCP (Beth Katz) Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 17 Summary: In article <357@busch.UUCP> dcm@busch.UUCP (Craig Miller) writes: >[ <1021@druri.UUCP> dht@druri.UUCP (Davis Tucker) ]: >> If only Oklahoma wouldn't let Texans in... what would Barry Switzer >> do for a starting football team? > I'd have to agree here... (even though it hurts to agree with > this Texan...) Then again, why are all those dumb Texans > playing for OU rather that UT? Says something for UT, doesn'tit? It seems to me that this is a double-edged sword. Maybe the OU Texans did not want to go to UT for various reasons. Or maybe UT didn't think they were good enough. Maybe I don't know what ESAD means in the subject line. Craig and Davis: Don't try to apply logic to this. We're having fun. Beth: Okay, fine! Could you guys at least cheer for Maryland in the Sun Bowl. The team has looked great this week as I've stared out my office window onto the practice field. GO TERPS.