Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley
From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Big Breasts
Message-ID: <10403@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 04:24:23 EST
Article-I.D.: watmath.10403
Posted: Fri Dec 14 04:24:23 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Dec-84 06:38:25 EST
References: <798@pucc-i>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 31


Well, while we're at it, why don't we get to the *** MEAT *** of it:
(as in SAUSAGE!!!!!!!!)

            H E Y ! ! ! ! !    W O M E N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

what kind of PENISES are you attracted to?  I noticed that *most* women
(notice I said "most", not all, I am NOT being sexist!) prefer big ones. 

Do you think that this is an evolutionary process, or a sociological phenomenon,
or are big PENISES simply better than small ones?  Have any of you found that
PENISES actually serve any real purpose in SEX or are we sexually attracted to
them simply because they are different?
How about TESTICLES?  does anybody out there really like TESTICLES or are they
just overrated kiwi fruits?  Also, do most of you do you prefer !cutting!
TESTICLES or !slicing! kiwis?

PLEASE answer, I am writing a book about this as it is obviously
a topic of paramount importance.  Actually, I have this theory (explained
in great detail in my upcoming book) that most men nowadays (in North
America, I don't really know about other parts of the world) have PENISES
and TESTICLES because prehistoric men needed them to spread their jeans,
oops.... genes.  In fact, I believe that only men with TESTICLES and PENISES
managed to produce healthy offsprings!

Far out, eh? isn't this a great revolutionary idea?
Move over, Darwin!!!!  You've met your match!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sophie Quigley
...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley