Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!tron From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: net.singles vs. net.women Message-ID: <839@vax1.fluke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 17:36:42 EST Article-I.D.: vax1.839 Posted: Mon Dec 17 17:36:42 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 02:34:15 EST References: <3171@alice.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 21 > Let's try to see some > > ***P*O*S*I*T*I*V*E*** > > comments in net.singles. All the sarcasm, belittling, chauvinism (of all > kinds and gender/sexes), ad-hominem attacks, continual disparagement > of both male and female fears, and the like are really good only for > /dev/null UNLESS you have some CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions. It's easy to I agree with Tom's desire for positive and constructive discussions. My suggestion is that if the point of your article is to tell someone you think they're wrong, you send them mail. Use the net to aplaud or discuss. Peter Barbee decvax-+-uw-beaver-+ ihnp4--+ allegra-+ ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron sun-+ ssc-vax-+ :