Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!faigin From: faigin@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: another 2010 mistake Message-ID: <2791@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Fri, 14-Dec-84 14:27:04 EST Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.2791 Posted: Fri Dec 14 14:27:04 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 17-Dec-84 03:09:44 EST References: <1193@bbncca.ARPA> <1194@bbncca.ARPA> <1115@ut-ngp.UUCP> Reply-To: faigin@ucla-cs.UUCP (Daniel Faigin) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 25 Xref: watmath net.movies:5243 net.sf-lovers:5390 Summary: In article <1115@ut-ngp.UUCP> cmaz504@ut-ngp.UUCP (Steve Alexander) writes: > >Another mistake in the film (other than Heywood Floyd knowing that the >monolith hadn't been discussed with the crew) is the lone EVA pod in the >docking bay of Discovery. I had always thought that there were only 3 >and if one was lost with Frank Poole, another when Bowman had to enter >the ship manually (ahem) and the last when Bowman heads toward the >monolith then why is that one there? I believe that it is that way in the book, and so the film is just being true to the book. As to whether the book is in error, I am not sure. -- | Daniel P. Faigin | (This space intentionally University of California at Los Angeles | left blank) | UUCP: {cepu|ihnp4|trwspp|ucbvax}!ucla-cs!faigin | ARPA: faigin@UCLA-CS.ARPA | USPS (Home): 11743 Darlington Avenue #9 | Los Angeles CA 90049 | (213) 826-3357 |