Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site mhuxt.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: Daredevil & the IRA Message-ID: <424@mhuxt.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Dec-84 16:47:04 EST Article-I.D.: mhuxt.424 Posted: Wed Dec 19 16:47:04 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 20-Dec-84 04:26:46 EST References: <4784@rochester.UUCP> <571@uwmacc.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill Lines: 23 > PLEASE don't comment about the motives of the IRA in net.comics. > A remarkably fruitless discussion about all of this has been going > on forever on the net, cross-posted to net.legal, net.politics, > net.nlang.celts, and net.flame. Periodically, something like > net.general and net.tv gets dragged in as well. > I really don't want to see net.comics get into this as well. > Comment about Glorianna O'Breen, talk about the statements made > by Daredevil, come up with inconsistencies and such in the plots. > Even talk about the IRA, as portrayed in Marvel comics. Alright, you want to talk about inconsistencies? Daredevil has ALWAYS (until now) been portrayed as an individual who is very concerned with the morality of his actions. Yet now, he is protecting someone, Glorianna, who he KNOWS is protecting terrorists, helping them escape from police, helping them to kill again. THAT's inconsistancy. Regardless of their motives, it's a known fact that they bomb innocent people. Who cares about their motives after that? Maybe they will expand on this in future issues, showing Daredevil recognize that he's only protecting her instead of telling the police about her because he (loves?) her, and how he deals with that conflict. Jeff Sonntag ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j