Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site looking.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!looking!brad From: brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.women Subject: The Anti-porn ordinance IS pornography (You'll enjoy this) Message-ID: <238@looking.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Dec-84 00:00:00 EST Article-I.D.: looking.238 Posted: Fri Dec 21 00:00:00 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 01:29:46 EST References: <249@ahuta.UUCP> Organization: Looking Glass Software, Waterloo, Ont Lines: 18 Xref: watmath net.legal:1132 net.women:3864 That ordinance has got to be one of the sickest, most vile things I have ever read. I think that this ordinance, because it states that adult women, found to be in full possesion of their faculties, are not empowered with the capacity to contract, WHILE MEN ARE. It states explicitly in that ordinance that a woman's contract to engage in a pornographic photo session can in now way be enforced. The men involved in the session, however, are deemed fully capapble of entering into the contracts. Thus we see that in a matter of sexually explicit material, women are demeaned to the status of children, while men are not. Thus this act is pornography, and its printing, display and distribution should be immediately banned upon its passing, which will hopefully be a cold day in hell. -- Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software Ltd. - Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473