Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!mark From: mark@digi-g.UUCP (Mark Mendel) Newsgroups: net.college,net.flame Subject: Re: "Universities need not verify draft status of students . . ." Message-ID: <435@digi-g.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Dec-84 13:51:48 EST Article-I.D.: digi-g.435 Posted: Mon Dec 17 13:51:48 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Dec-84 02:43:43 EST References: <577@pucc-k> <147@panda.UUCP> <247@ssc-vax.UUCP> <371@amdcad.UUCP> Reply-To: mark@digi-g.UUCP (mark) Distribution: net Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN Lines: 17 Xref: watmath net.college:569 net.flame:7343 Summary: In article <371@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes: >> that women >> would be raped if they became POWs (whereas, we all know that male POWs >> play bridge and drink Kahlua & cream while in captivity). >> -- Mark A. > >Yeah, I know a woman who claims to be a feminist but doesn't want to >get drafted for the above reason. > >I find it impossible to take her seriously. Can you say "rights without >responsibilities"? Sure you can. No one (except myself) can foist upon me a "responsibilty" to be party to killing people. Sorry. Those I know, however, that have, tend to suffer pyschological damage quite comprable to being raped.