Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rti-sel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!rti-sel!rcb From: rcb@rti-sel.UUCP (Randy Buckland) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.flame Subject: Re: Kulawiec on Sargent on speaking in tongues Message-ID: <25@rti-sel.UUCP> Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 10:09:39 EST Article-I.D.: rti-sel.25 Posted: Tue Nov 27 10:09:39 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 29-Nov-84 05:57:48 EST References: <231@pyuxd.UUCP> <1469@pucc-h>, <184@stat-l> <1489@pucc-h>, <191@stat-l> <1503@pucc-h> <198@stat-l> Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC Lines: 18 > > This is not a flame. Rather, it is a substitute for a tactical > nuclear weapon, which is an awful bother to carry about, doesn't fit > through 1200 baud modems very well, and tends to cause a large amount > of irration to those in the general vicinity of the target area. > . . . Lets hear it for a reasonable and logical approach to the discussion. However, lets get the terminology right. That was a strategic not tactical nuke. And it was the best argument for an arms buildup I've ever seen. Put the nukes to good use. Randy Buckland Research Triangle Institute ...!mcnc!rti-sel!rcb