Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!aecom!teitz From: teitz@aecom.UUCP (Eliyahu Teitz) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments) Message-ID: <993@aecom.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 13:44:54 EST Article-I.D.: aecom.993 Posted: Tue Dec 4 13:44:54 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:21:56 EST References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY Lines: 14 > In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes: > >But if there were no God, man would not exist. Nothing would exist. (This > >could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....) > > Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created > God did not exist, God would not exist. Of course, this holds true for > whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum. Why do we stop with > one level of indirection? > > Ken Arnold this assumes that G-D was created. Eliyahu Teitz.