Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!jeff From: jeff@dciem.UUCP (Jeff Richardson) Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey Subject: Maple Leafs' defence Message-ID: <1263@dciem.UUCP> Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 17:53:50 EST Article-I.D.: dciem.1263 Posted: Mon Dec 10 17:53:50 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 10-Dec-84 18:57:30 EST Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada Lines: 23 I found Carlo's comments about the Leafs' defensemen very interesting, though I don't agree completely. I agree that they have a lot of excellent young prospects who could be future stars, but I don't think they'll amount to anything unless management does something soon. You can't throw a bunch of young defensemen onto a last place team and expect them to do everything themselves and come out of it without ruining their confidence completely. They need one or two good, experienced two-way defensemen to help bring them along. Salming fits the bill except that I don't think he's much of a leader and he seems to get injured an awful lot, and I don't think he'll last much longer, especially on such a terrible team, but you can tell how much the rest of the guys need his experience because they fall completely apart whenever he's injured. I was very upset when Dave Maloney got traded to Buffalo because he's a guy that the Leafs should have got. I figured he was available, and the Rangers were the team the Leafs had the best chance of making a deal with because of their surplus of experienced defensemen, their poor record over the last month or so, the fact that they're in a different division, and they have been mentioned in the past as a team that might be interested in Salming, plus they're weak on right wing, so they might be willing to give up a lot to get Rick Vaive. -- Jeff Richardson, DCIEM, Toronto (416) 635-2073 {linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd}!utcsrgv!dciem!jeff {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!dciem!jeff