Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!cmaz504 From: cmaz504@ut-ngp.UUCP (Steve Alexander) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: another 2010 mistake Message-ID: <1115@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Tue, 11-Dec-84 10:31:42 EST Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1115 Posted: Tue Dec 11 10:31:42 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Dec-84 02:21:18 EST References: <1193@bbncca.ARPA>, <1194@bbncca.ARPA> Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 9 Xref: watmath net.movies:5192 net.sf-lovers:5370 Another mistake in the film (other than Heywood Floyd knowing that the monolith hadn't been discussed with the crew) is the lone EVA pod in the docking bay of Discovery. I had always thought that there were only 3 and if one was lost with Frank Poole, another when Bowman had to enter the ship manually (ahem) and the last when Bowman heads toward the monolith then why is that one there? The suit without the helmet in the docking bay may also be a blooper (shouldn't it be a helmet without a suit?) but I haven't seen 2001 in awhile.