Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!randvax!rohn
From: rohn@randvax.UUCP (Laurinda Rohn)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Boy, is net.politics busy these days...
Message-ID: <2171@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 11:31:29 EST
Article-I.D.: randvax.2171
Posted: Tue Dec  4 11:31:29 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:18:23 EST
References: <137@talcott.UUCP> <294@spp2.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.politics:6116 net.news.group:2613

>In fact, net.politics is about eight times as busy as, say, net.math or
>net.physics.  I suggest we split it up into some or all of the following:
>
>             net.politics.abortion
>             net.politics.economic
>             net.politics.foreign
>             net.politics.nukes
>             net.politics.rights
>             net.politics.sevener :-)
>
>                     Greg Kuperberg

I think creating a subgroup or two might not be a bad idea.  As an
initial experiment, I would propose creating net.politics.libertarian.
This might cut down the traffic substantially.  I don't think
net.politics.abortion would help much.  Abortion isn't strictly a
political issue.  I don't think anything is wrong with keeping net.
abortion as it is.

					Lauri