Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!aecom!berger From: berger@aecom.UUCP (Mitchell Berger) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments) Message-ID: <997@aecom.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 16:43:36 EST Article-I.D.: aecom.997 Posted: Tue Dec 4 16:43:36 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:22:35 EST References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> <993@aecom.UUCP> Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY Lines: 21 > > In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes: > > >But if there were no God, man would not exist. Nothing would exist. (This > > >could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....) > > > > Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created > > God did not exist, God would not exist. Of course, this holds true for > > whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum. Why do we stop with > > one level of indirection? > > > > Ken Arnold > > this assumes that G-D was created. > > Eliyahu Teitz. > *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE *** I beleive that what Eliyahu is trying to say (and if he isn't, I am) is that since G-d created time, the concept of G-d being created, i.e. G-d's begining, i.e. his innitial point IN time, is a meaningless concept. micha b