Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pyuxc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxc!chris
From: chris@pyuxc.UUCP (R. Hollenbeck)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: net.personals
Message-ID: <581@pyuxc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 11:30:35 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxc.581
Posted: Mon Dec 10 11:30:35 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 04:15:49 EST
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway, NJ
Lines: 11

Regarding the propaosal
set up a mailing list 
instead of a net.personals group:
How would this be different 
from a net.personals group?
The best way to find out if there's a need for net.personals
is to create it and see how it goes.
If it fails, it fails. If it succeeds, great.
Why is there such a strong reaction to introducing sex into (or
alongside) net.singles?  Could it be that net.singles is meant to
be a dry hump?