Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!alan
From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments)
Message-ID: <1537@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Dec-84 15:52:07 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1537
Posted: Thu Dec  6 15:52:07 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 05:54:34 EST
References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> <993@aecom.UUCP>
Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 20
Summary: 

< USEnet provides a good case for the need for excorcism.>

>> If whatever created God did not exist, God would not exist.
>> Why do we stop with one level of indirection?
>> 
>> 		Ken Arnold
>
>   this assumes that G-D was created.
>
>	Eliyahu Teitz.

A popular line of reasoning among believers is:  If whatever created the
universe did not exist, the universe would not exist. (See recent postings
defending the Design Arguement for the existence of God, for example)

    this assumes that The -n-v-rs- was created.

Thank you, Eliyahu Teitz, for refuting this arguement for the existence
of God.
	sdcrdcf!alan