Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!Pawka 
From: Pawka 
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Cover Versions
Message-ID: <6251@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 30-Nov-84 17:57:07 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6251
Posted: Fri Nov 30 17:57:07 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Dec-84 05:13:06 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 30

>> Dave ?Axler? resonds "... a cover version is, to wit, a re-make
>> of any song originally recorded by another artist, no matter how
>> good or bad the remake may be..."

>> and "...Fame and fortune are totally irrelevant to whether or not
>> a song's a cover version -- all that matters is whether or not
>> it's the original..."

	I believe the origin of the term "cover" version had to do with
early R&B tunes which were performed by black artists and played mostly
on "underground" stations in the late forties and early fifties. A good
example would be "Hound Dog" by Elvis. Most people associate that song
with Elvis and might be surprised to know "Big Mama" Thornton wrote and
sung that tune, as she did with "Ball and Chain", later successfully
covered by Janis Joplin. Maybe the term has something with one of the
definitions of cover, "to put something over or upon for concealment".
Anyone can do "their version" or a "re-make" of a tune, but I think that
a "cover version" implies more. This is not to imply that the "cover"
version is not done well, in a lot of cases it may be as good or better
than the original. This may seem to be just semantics, but to me it's
giving some artists too much credit. (Here's the Dead Meat Puppets with
their "cover version" of Johnny B. Goode . . .) Anyway I would be interested
in Dave's references, in the meantime I'm going to try to dig out the
books where I read all this,

					Mike

< Wrongo ???>

------