Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site milo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!milo!eric
From: eric@milo.UUCP (Eric Bergan)
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: 2010 review--non spoiler
Message-ID: <782@milo.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Dec-84 08:36:55 EST
Article-I.D.: milo.782
Posted: Tue Dec 11 08:36:55 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Dec-84 02:15:43 EST
References: <1193@bbncca.ARPA> <264@umd5.UUCP>
Organization: JHU/Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.movies:5191 net.sf-lovers:5369

>Many people have argued that 2010 should not be judged against 2001, one
>of the most influential movies of all time.  Perhaps it IS an unfair
>comparison, for 2010 is inferior in almost every respect.

	Actually, I don't think it is unfair at all. They are obviously
reaping marketing benefits by being a sequel, they should also be prepared
to take their lumps in comparison.

-- 
					eric
					...!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!milo!eric