Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!pesnta!qumix!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!ix772
From: ix772@sdcc6.UUCP (Richard J. Willis)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.women.only
Subject: Re: proposed removal of net.women.only
Message-ID: <1829@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 21:53:55 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1829
Posted: Tue Nov 27 21:53:55 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Nov-84 06:41:47 EST
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 34
Xref: dcdwest net.women:2248 net.women.only:65

C
ZZ


> In article <209@calmasd.UUCP> gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan) writes:
> >If David DiGiacomo doesn't want net.women.only on his own
> >machine, he doesn't have to accept it from his news feed
> >(assuming it is under his control).  Likewise for those who
> >agree with him that net.women.only is "a waste of net
> >resources".
> >Long Live Net.women.only!
> >Gail Bayley Hanrahan
> >{ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail
> 
> Right.  And if David is administrator for a backbone machine, it is ok
> with you that everyone getting their newsfeed from him can do without
> it also, right?  
> 
> 	How about if the name gets changed to net.rabid.feminists?
> (As opposed to net.feminists, a name which implies that men 
> might be acceptable also?) 
> 
> 	I'm sure David D. wouldn't care about the group name, then.
> What's that?  The name is offensive?  But it's only so that women
> can have their own space without MEN interfering!  
> -- 
> "The weight of the world is love." -- Allan Ginsberg
> 
> Rick Keir -- MicroComputer Information Center, MACC
> 1210 West Dayton St/U Wisconsin Madison/Mad WI 53706
> 
> {allegra, ihnp4, seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!rick

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***