Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!miller From: miller@uiucdcsb.UUCP Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Re: Paranoid fancies Message-ID: <32500015@uiucdcsb.UUCP> Date: Sun, 9-Dec-84 02:47:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.32500015 Posted: Sun Dec 9 02:47:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 03:34:02 EST References: <1241@ihuxr.UUCP> Lines: 23 Nf-ID: #R:ihuxr:-124100:uiucdcsb:32500015:000:1283 Nf-From: uiucdcsb!miller Dec 9 01:47:00 1984 I find Lew's most recent article on the evolutionists' position on education quite satisfying. I challenged the evolutionists to support their claim and allowed them the use of any and all material published by ICR, CRS, BSA, or SOR. Lew calls my offer a "restriction on allowable sources". Indeed! Since these are the only large organized creationists groups that I know of, I find his hesitancy quite illuminating. Instead, Lew digs out some obscure letter between two individuals not in any way connected with any of the groups just mentioned. In fact, neither ICR, CRS, BSA nor SOR has suggested that the best way to get creationism accepted is to either 1) remove evolution from the schools or from the eduction of creationist children (the current topic under discussion) or even 2) pass legislation mandating equal time. In fact, Dr. Gish has even said he would "not recommend" other states to pass equal time provisions. Now I know both 1 & 2 are favorite myths of the evolutionists, but you'll just have to document your case before spreading any more disinformation - at least on this net. A. Ray Miller Univ Illinios ps. I repeat: where are the SOR #3 pamphlet criticisms? I'm almost ready with #4 and I don't want to post it until I've seen the results of #3.