Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucsfcgl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!arnold From: arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold%CGL) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments) Message-ID: <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 29-Nov-84 17:43:29 EST Article-I.D.: ucsfcgl.397 Posted: Thu Nov 29 17:43:29 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Dec-84 20:30:33 EST References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> Reply-To: arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab Lines: 10 Summary: In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes: >But if there were no God, man would not exist. Nothing would exist. (This >could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....) Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created God did not exist, God would not exist. Of course, this holds true for whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum. Why do we stop with one level of indirection? Ken Arnold