Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!aecom!teitz
From: teitz@aecom.UUCP (Eliyahu Teitz)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments)
Message-ID: <993@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 13:44:54 EST
Article-I.D.: aecom.993
Posted: Tue Dec  4 13:44:54 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:21:56 EST
References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 14

> In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes:
> >But if there were no God, man would not exist.  Nothing would exist.  (This
> >could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....)
> 
> Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created
> God did not exist, God would not exist.  Of course, this holds true for
> whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum.  Why do we stop with
> one level of indirection?
> 
> 		Ken Arnold

   this assumes that G-D was created.

	Eliyahu Teitz.