Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (L 'Deathwish' Chabot)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Tolerance (Jeff, Chuqui, Plaid, Paisley)
Message-ID: <197@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 10:43:49 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.197
Posted: Mon Dec 10 10:43:49 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 07:36:52 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 25

Pooh  ==  >
> What it boils down to here is that while Jeff may have exhibited some
> disapproval, distaste or whatever for the ideas other people live by, he has
> never been malicious or intentionally insulting--UNLIKE some other people we
> all have encountered. 

Like hell!  What about the great homosexuals-perceive-the-opposite-sex-as-enemy
stuff in net.motss!!  Which category does this fit into: Jeff exhibiting 
"whatever"?!  It is, IT IS insulting to go bleating belittling theories about
behavior of which one lacks direct experience: the homosexual's-perceived-
enemies theory as well as the all-women-want-abuse garbage as espoused here
periodically (again and again).  The lack of tact itself is galling. 

And look, if there are those of you who aren't gay or don't have gay friends
and therefore aren't insulted by the homosexual's-perceived-enemies theory
and there are those of you who aren't women or don't have women friends and 
therefore aren't insulted by the all-women-want-abuse theory, then speak up!
We've several equal opportunity offenders available for public consultation
here on the net, and we can come up with an insult for You! (or at least your
intelligence).

L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
shadow:	[ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]