Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site smu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!smu!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@smu.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Death for we who deserve it
Message-ID: <15900002@smu.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Dec-84 23:46:00 EST
Article-I.D.: smu.15900002
Posted: Sun Dec  9 23:46:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Dec-84 03:42:39 EST
References: <275@ho95b.UUCP>
Lines: 11
Nf-ID: #R:ho95b:-27500:smu:15900002:000:428
Nf-From: smu!mcdonald    Dec  9 22:46:00 1984


I was taught (about 8 years ago) that the first instance in both examples
is incorrect -- that it is always (my picking) that is being referred to,
and that in a construction like (we/us who) the who takes the case required
by the subordinate clause and the we/us takes the case required by the 
outer clause/phrase.

Unfortunately I don't still have the text to refer to.

                                                 McD