Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!Mark SienkiewiczFrom: Mark Sienkiewicz Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: more on asynch i/o Message-ID: <6382@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 5-Dec-84 18:46:35 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6382 Posted: Wed Dec 5 18:46:35 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 05:57:40 EST Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 11 > If you expect your reads to be interrupted by signals, you should be > prepared to handle the condition and take appropriate action (such as > calling read again). Yes, you SHOULD be prepared, but that is not to say that you are. It is something to look out for if you use this method. Anybody know if stdio can handle this? Mark.