Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!jcp From: jcp@brl-tgr.ARPA (Joe Pistritto) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: Lets get 1600 Penn. Ave on the net. Message-ID: <6133@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 28-Nov-84 11:24:04 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6133 Posted: Wed Nov 28 11:24:04 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 30-Nov-84 07:07:18 EST References: <330@stcvax.UUCP> Reply-To: jcp@brl-tgr.ARPA (Joe Pistritto ) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 25 Summary: In article <330@stcvax.UUCP> jps@stcvax.UUCP (Jeff Snover) writes: >Is the white house (1600 Penn. ave.) on the net? If it is not >(as I suspect) how can we get it on? It seems to me that they >would be interested in getting feedback from as many people as >possible and the net would be a perfect medium. (keep any flames >about "the white house doesn't care" to yourself or else feel free >to post them to /dev/null or anywhere else where I don't have to >see them!!). > >I know that if I want to write to the white house I should pick >up pen in hand and go for it via the US SNAIL but when it gets right >down to it I usually won't because I fluked penmanship and I don't >have a typewriter and to get to the point: its a pain in the ass! The net >is easy and fun to use and if I had a path to the white house I would >mail them feedback on things pro and con on a fairly frequent basis >and I think alot of other folks would do so also. > >What do you think guys? (colloquialism - implies women, wombats, wackballs) > >-- >Jeffrey P. Snover - STC StorageTek (Disk Division) >uucp: { hao, ihnp4, decvax}!stcvax!jps > { allegra, amd70, ucbvax }!nbires!stcvax!jps >USnail: Storage Technology Corp - MD 3T / Louisville, CO / 80028 >DDD: (303) 673-6750