Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site oakhill.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!oakhill!davet From: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k Subject: Re: 32016 bug summary wanted... Message-ID: <255@oakhill.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 08:14:44 EST Article-I.D.: oakhill.255 Posted: Tue Dec 4 08:14:44 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 05:51:08 EST References: <>Reply-To: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Distribution: net Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx Lines: 32 Summary: In article <1938@nsc.UUCP> srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) writes: >In article <693@sjuvax.UUCP> jss@sjuvax.UUCP (Jonathan Shapiro) writes: >> >> A lot of talk has been exchanged here about microcode bugs in the movsu >>.... I have heard the same about problems with the MMU. Any comments on >>that one? > >If anyone can help me track down the source of this kind of rumor, I'd >appreciate it. It goes beyond the limits of normal competitive give and >take. ............ > >-- >Richard Mateosian >{cbosgd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA Dear Net.viewers, It may interest you all to know about the pot calling the kettle. It seems lately that our customers are telling us that someone at National is spreading the rumor that the MC68020 is actually an NMOS, and *NOT* a CHMOS machine. (We won't go into a discussion on how much power 200,000 NMOS transistors would take versus the .5 watts consumption of the MC68020.) Also, the same felon has had the nerve to personally post this weak excuse of a rumor to me. I'll give ya one guess who it is, and the first one doesn't count! (We'll just chalk Jonathan's comments up to "normal competitive give and take" eh, Richard?) Motorola Semiconductor Dave Trissel Austin, Texas 32-bit Applications Engineer