Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 4/2/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!wed From: wed@drutx.UUCP (DeibertWE) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Hmmmm Message-ID: <1562@drutx.UUCP> Date: Sun, 9-Dec-84 14:59:57 EST Article-I.D.: drutx.1562 Posted: Sun Dec 9 14:59:57 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 10-Dec-84 03:21:11 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 32 > = myself >> = Gerald Owens >>> = Ken Montgomery > Should males be held responsible financially and/or emotionally for a > baby that is born when the same male has no decision making rights as > far as abortion is concerned? >>> Yes. The man should be held financially responsible for half of the >>> cost, either of the birth and subsequent care, or of the abortion; >>> whichever the woman chooses. >> ... My intention was to mean that, once it was determined that a >> woman was pregnant, that there was another life involved than >> just the woman's convenience, and in this case, there IS a duty >> involved! Just as much a duty as that a father SHOULD support >> his children! ... >>> Why does anyone have the duty to support anyone else? -------------------------> Hmmm....? <------------------------- William D.