Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucsfcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!arnold
From: arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold%CGL)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments)
Message-ID: <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 29-Nov-84 17:43:29 EST
Article-I.D.: ucsfcgl.397
Posted: Thu Nov 29 17:43:29 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Dec-84 20:30:33 EST
References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP>
Reply-To: arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab
Lines: 10
Summary: 

In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes:
>But if there were no God, man would not exist.  Nothing would exist.  (This
>could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....)

Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created
God did not exist, God would not exist.  Of course, this holds true for
whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum.  Why do we stop with
one level of indirection?

		Ken Arnold