Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!Mark Sienkiewicz 
From: Mark Sienkiewicz 
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: more on asynch i/o
Message-ID: <6382@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 5-Dec-84 18:46:35 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6382
Posted: Wed Dec  5 18:46:35 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 05:57:40 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 11

> If you expect your reads to be interrupted by signals, you should be
> prepared to handle the condition and take appropriate action (such as
> calling read again).

Yes, you SHOULD be prepared, but that is not to say that you are.  It is
something to look out for if you use this method.

Anybody know if stdio can handle this?


			Mark.