Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ariel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ahuta!houti!ariel!norm From: norm@ariel.UUCP (N.ANDREWS) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.philosophy Subject: Re: the defense industry and the graduating engineer. Message-ID: <796@ariel.UUCP> Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 12:54:09 EST Article-I.D.: ariel.796 Posted: Mon Dec 10 12:54:09 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 04:00:13 EST References: <140@hal.UUCP> Organization: AT&T-ISL, Holmdel, NJ Lines: 19 Xref: watmath net.politics:6224 net.philosophy:1291 > Military policy depends on foreign policies which depend on political policies which depend on political theories which depend on ethical policies and theories which depend on epistemological policies which depend on epistemological theories which depend on metaphysical theories. > A lot of learning and thinking has to be done before anyone can rationally conclude that there is something unethical about the United States' defense industry. > If you think there is something unethical about the defense industry, then you have to decide on many, many issues... You may find that it isn't unethical to be employed by an unethical employer. > Kant created the death-camps. Kant is alive and well. If you want to have an impact that's significant, get Kant. > (A good starting point would be Leonard Peikoff's book, The Ominous Parallels). >