Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uok.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!bruhgraw
From: bruhgraw@uok.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: BYU and Oklahoma: Who's # 1
Message-ID: <8200014@uok.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 10:57:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uok.8200014
Posted: Tue Dec  4 10:57:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 01:12:53 EST
References: <1506@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:sdcrdcf:-150600:uok:8200014:37777777600:890
Nf-From: uok!bruhgraw    Dec  4 09:57:00 1984

>>                ....the question of who has the toughest schedule became
>>  moot one Saturday afternoon in Kansas.  OK lost to an unranked
>>  team 28 - 11, (the fact that they had some injuries doesn't change
>>  anything)....

They had some injuries doesn't change anything??   Hey, apparently
you forget that it was their quarterback, the heart of their offense,
who was out.  The replacement was *not* a wishbone quarterback, and in
the passing dept., he had only 3 receptions, 2 to the other team.  I
would say that the injury to Danny Bradley changed the ENTIRE outcome of
the game.  Look at what he did to Missouri the next week, when he did
play.  OU 49, Missouri 7.

If Bradley would not have been hurt in Kansas, OU would've walked all
over them.  Wait 'til you see what he does to Washington.  Maybe then
you'll believe OU deserves to be #1.

						!ctvax!uokvax!uok!bruhgraw