Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!alan From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments) Message-ID: <1537@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Date: Thu, 6-Dec-84 15:52:07 EST Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1537 Posted: Thu Dec 6 15:52:07 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 05:54:34 EST References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> <993@aecom.UUCP> Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak) Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica Lines: 20 Summary: < USEnet provides a good case for the need for excorcism.> >> If whatever created God did not exist, God would not exist. >> Why do we stop with one level of indirection? >> >> Ken Arnold > > this assumes that G-D was created. > > Eliyahu Teitz. A popular line of reasoning among believers is: If whatever created the universe did not exist, the universe would not exist. (See recent postings defending the Design Arguement for the existence of God, for example) this assumes that The -n-v-rs- was created. Thank you, Eliyahu Teitz, for refuting this arguement for the existence of God. sdcrdcf!alan