Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!miller
From: miller@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: Paranoid fancies
Message-ID: <32500015@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Dec-84 02:47:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.32500015
Posted: Sun Dec  9 02:47:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 03:34:02 EST
References: <1241@ihuxr.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxr:-124100:uiucdcsb:32500015:000:1283
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!miller    Dec  9 01:47:00 1984

I find Lew's most recent article on the evolutionists' position on education
quite satisfying.  I challenged the evolutionists to support their claim
and allowed them the use of any and all material published by ICR, CRS, BSA, or
SOR.  Lew calls my offer a "restriction on allowable sources".  Indeed!  Since
these are the only large organized creationists groups that I know of, I find
his hesitancy quite illuminating.  Instead, Lew digs out some obscure letter
between two individuals not in any way connected with any of the groups just
mentioned.  In fact, neither ICR, CRS, BSA nor SOR has suggested that the best
way to get creationism accepted is to either 1) remove evolution from the 
schools or from the eduction of creationist children (the current topic under
discussion) or even 2) pass legislation mandating equal time.  In fact,
Dr. Gish has even said he would "not recommend" other states to pass equal time
provisions.
Now I know both 1 & 2 are favorite myths of the evolutionists, but you'll just
have to document your case before spreading any more disinformation - at least
on this net.

A. Ray Miller
Univ Illinios

ps. I repeat: where are the SOR #3 pamphlet criticisms?  I'm almost ready with
#4 and I don't want to post it until I've seen the results of #3.