Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site daisy.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!nsc!daisy!pkl From: pkl@daisy.UUCP (Peter K. Lee) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: How about &&= and ||= ? Message-ID: <25@daisy.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 18:14:24 EST Article-I.D.: daisy.25 Posted: Tue Dec 4 18:14:24 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 06:32:58 EST References: <5700031@ea.UUCP> Organization: Daisy Systems Corp., Mountain View Lines: 12 > Speaking of ^^ and ==== (?!), I always wondered why C didn't have &&= and > ||= (with the obvious semantics). > James Jones &= and |= are sufficient already. Remember ... C doesn't really have booleans. -- -- Peter Lee ...{ucbvax!amd,decwrl,ihnp4}!nsc!daisy!pkl [No news is good news]