Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uok.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!bruhgraw From: bruhgraw@uok.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: BYU and Oklahoma: Who's # 1 Message-ID: <8200014@uok.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 10:57:00 EST Article-I.D.: uok.8200014 Posted: Tue Dec 4 10:57:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 01:12:53 EST References: <1506@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Lines: 19 Nf-ID: #R:sdcrdcf:-150600:uok:8200014:37777777600:890 Nf-From: uok!bruhgraw Dec 4 09:57:00 1984 >> ....the question of who has the toughest schedule became >> moot one Saturday afternoon in Kansas. OK lost to an unranked >> team 28 - 11, (the fact that they had some injuries doesn't change >> anything).... They had some injuries doesn't change anything?? Hey, apparently you forget that it was their quarterback, the heart of their offense, who was out. The replacement was *not* a wishbone quarterback, and in the passing dept., he had only 3 receptions, 2 to the other team. I would say that the injury to Danny Bradley changed the ENTIRE outcome of the game. Look at what he did to Missouri the next week, when he did play. OU 49, Missouri 7. If Bradley would not have been hurt in Kansas, OU would've walked all over them. Wait 'til you see what he does to Washington. Maybe then you'll believe OU deserves to be #1. !ctvax!uokvax!uok!bruhgraw