Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!alan From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak) Newsgroups: net.women.only Subject: Re: feminine "protection" Message-ID: <1528@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Date: Mon, 3-Dec-84 20:41:20 EST Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1528 Posted: Mon Dec 3 20:41:20 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 03:40:27 EST References: <10083@watmath.UUCP> Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak) Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica Lines: 22 Summary: > > So, is that what we've >been so worried about all this time? protecting our underwear? not only that, >but protecting it against ourselves? it sure doesn't reflect well on the >concerns of "modern woman" does it? It's funny, but the impression I have >from the tone of the ads I hear on TV or see in magazines, is that we are >the ones being protected. The only thing I can think of we are being >protected against are our own icky bodies with their dripping fluids > >Sophie Quigley > Right On, Sophie! What self-respecting, liberated person would use toilet paper now-a-days, anyway? > Am I the only paranoid on this >issue? > No, i suspect that there are other people paranoid on this issue, too. sdcrdcf!alan