Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pyuxc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxc!chris From: chris@pyuxc.UUCP (R. Hollenbeck) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: net.personals Message-ID: <581@pyuxc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 11:30:35 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxc.581 Posted: Mon Dec 10 11:30:35 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 04:15:49 EST Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway, NJ Lines: 11 Regarding the propaosal set up a mailing list instead of a net.personals group: How would this be different from a net.personals group? The best way to find out if there's a need for net.personals is to create it and see how it goes. If it fails, it fails. If it succeeds, great. Why is there such a strong reaction to introducing sex into (or alongside) net.singles? Could it be that net.singles is meant to be a dry hump?