Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!aecom!berger
From: berger@aecom.UUCP (Mitchell Berger)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: Re: More replies to Ken (and general comments)
Message-ID: <997@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 16:43:36 EST
Article-I.D.: aecom.997
Posted: Tue Dec  4 16:43:36 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:22:35 EST
References: <1114@trwrba.UUCP> <> <1905@nsc.UUCP> <397@ucsfcgl.UUCP> <993@aecom.UUCP>
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 21

> > In article <1506@pucc-h> aeq@pucc-h (Jeff Sargent) writes:
> > >But if there were no God, man would not exist.  Nothing would exist.  (This
> > >could get into some really mind-bending philosophy....)
> > 
> > Well, this leads us to the logical next statement: If whatever created
> > God did not exist, God would not exist.  Of course, this holds true for
> > whatever created whatever created God, ad nauseum.  Why do we stop with
> > one level of indirection?
> > 
> > 		Ken Arnold
> 
>    this assumes that G-D was created.
> 
> 	Eliyahu Teitz.
> 

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
I beleive that what Eliyahu is trying to say (and if he isn't, I am) is that
since G-d created time, the concept of G-d being created, i.e. G-d's begining,
i.e. his innitial point IN time, is a meaningless concept.
                                   micha b