Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cavell.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!alberta!cavell!scottm
From: scottm@cavell.UUCP (Scott McPhee)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Get a load of this:
Message-ID: <22@cavell.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Dec-84 16:28:04 EST
Article-I.D.: cavell.22
Posted: Wed Dec  5 16:28:04 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 06:15:15 EST
Distribution: na
Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Lines: 20


>They don't compare. The Atari is so superior to the C64 that I don't
>know where to start. The graphics are better, the games are better and
>from what I have seen, there is more software for the Atari than the
>C64. One last comment: A very close friend of mine, who is in the
>business of writing games, believes that the Atari is better than; C64,
>VIC-20, Adam and TI. He was given all of the small computers and all of the
>game machines on the market to write software for them. So he knows what 
>he's talking about.
>
>
>Clancy Malloy
>AT&T Bell Labs
>Naperville, IL
>(..!ihuxj!freak)
 
Do you agree? Should we start throwing bananas at each other?
How about tomatoes? 
Lets see some good flame, collect a database full of evidence to the
contrary, and nuke net.atari for a Christmas joy. Can you believe it?