Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site okstate.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate!kermit From: kermit@okstate.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.ti Subject: Re: Large XBASIC programs on cassette Message-ID: <26500001@okstate.UUCP> Date: Thu, 29-Nov-84 17:43:00 EST Article-I.D.: okstate.26500001 Posted: Thu Nov 29 17:43:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Dec-84 04:53:14 EST References: <1855@nsc.UUCP> Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R:nsc:-185500:okstate:26500001:000:624 Nf-From: okstate!kermit Nov 29 16:43:00 1984 [munch...munch...munch...] Since you are using EX-Basic, the best solution would probably be to modularize your program and then use statements like RUN "CS1" to load and run the next phase of the assembler. Although this doesn't allow you to pass variables to the next phase, it is about the only way to get a big program in a small machine. If you really want an assembler, than you should look into finding an EDITOR/ASSEMBLER package and a disk system. Beleive me, it is more than worth the money. Gregg WonderlyOklahoma State University Department of Computing and Information Sciences