Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!decwrl!sun!qubix!ios!oliveb!oliven!danw
From: danw@oliven.UUCP (danw)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: why not?
Message-ID: <732@oliven.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Nov-84 11:53:13 EST
Article-I.D.: oliven.732
Posted: Fri Nov 30 11:53:13 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Dec-84 05:07:28 EST
Organization: National Cobalt Testing Range
Lines: 17

=======================================================================



> By the way, in a libertarian society, nothing would prevent people from
> forming and joining compacts designed to result in enforced
> Pareto-optimal outcomes among themselves.  

>>That's a valid point which Clarke discusses at some length.  However, it
>>would not work for large-scale externality problems like air pollution,
>>national defense, research, and many others.

	Why not? 
 
						danw