Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!dan
From: dan@digi-g.UUCP (Dan Messinger)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Logical vs bitwise operators
Message-ID: <410@digi-g.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 09:36:04 EST
Article-I.D.: digi-g.410
Posted: Tue Nov 27 09:36:04 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Nov-84 08:07:14 EST
References: <1181@orca.UUCP>
Reply-To: dan@digi-g.UUCP (dan)
Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN
Lines: 16
Summary: 

In article <1181@orca.UUCP> andrew@orca.UUCP (Andrew Klossner) writes:
>If we're going to have the ^^ operator as a logical version of bitwise
>^, then we simply must have a logical version of the equivalence (EQV)
>operator, ==.
>
>Following the existing convention, it will be spelled ====.  Thus:
>
>	(a====b) is equivalent to ((a!=0) == (b!=0))
>
>(-:    or we could spell ^^ as !=!=    :-)

Ah, but a====b is easily expressed as !(a^^b).   :-)

(I can be as ridiculous as the next guy)
Dan Messinger
ihnp4!umn-cs!digi-g!dan