Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!alan
From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Newsgroups: net.women.only
Subject: Re: feminine "protection"
Message-ID: <1528@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Dec-84 20:41:20 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1528
Posted: Mon Dec  3 20:41:20 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 03:40:27 EST
References: <10083@watmath.UUCP>
Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 22
Summary: 

>
> So, is that what we've
>been so worried about all this time? protecting our underwear? not only that,
>but protecting it against ourselves?  it sure doesn't reflect well on the
>concerns of "modern woman" does it?  It's funny, but the impression I have
>from the tone of the ads I hear on TV or see in magazines, is that we are
>the ones being protected.  The only thing I can think of we are being
>protected against are our own icky bodies with their dripping fluids 
>
>Sophie Quigley
>

 Right On, Sophie! What self-respecting, liberated person would use toilet
 paper now-a-days, anyway?

> Am I the only paranoid on this
>issue?
>

No, i suspect that there are other people paranoid on this issue, too.

	sdcrdcf!alan