Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cavell.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!alberta!cavell!scottm From: scottm@cavell.UUCP (Scott McPhee) Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm Subject: Get a load of this: Message-ID: <22@cavell.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Dec-84 16:28:04 EST Article-I.D.: cavell.22 Posted: Wed Dec 5 16:28:04 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 06:15:15 EST Distribution: na Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Lines: 20 >They don't compare. The Atari is so superior to the C64 that I don't >know where to start. The graphics are better, the games are better and >from what I have seen, there is more software for the Atari than the >C64. One last comment: A very close friend of mine, who is in the >business of writing games, believes that the Atari is better than; C64, >VIC-20, Adam and TI. He was given all of the small computers and all of the >game machines on the market to write software for them. So he knows what >he's talking about. > > >Clancy Malloy >AT&T Bell Labs >Naperville, IL >(..!ihuxj!freak) Do you agree? Should we start throwing bananas at each other? How about tomatoes? Lets see some good flame, collect a database full of evidence to the contrary, and nuke net.atari for a Christmas joy. Can you believe it?