Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site daisy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!nsc!daisy!pkl
From: pkl@daisy.UUCP (Peter K. Lee)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: How about &&= and ||= ?
Message-ID: <25@daisy.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 18:14:24 EST
Article-I.D.: daisy.25
Posted: Tue Dec  4 18:14:24 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Dec-84 06:32:58 EST
References: <5700031@ea.UUCP>
Organization: Daisy Systems Corp., Mountain View
Lines: 12

> Speaking of ^^ and ==== (?!), I always wondered why C didn't have &&= and
> ||= (with the obvious semantics).
> 						James Jones

&= and |= are sufficient already.  Remember ... C doesn't really
have booleans.

-- 
			-- Peter Lee
			...{ucbvax!amd,decwrl,ihnp4}!nsc!daisy!pkl

[No news is good news]