Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!randvax!rohn From: rohn@randvax.UUCP (Laurinda Rohn) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.news.group Subject: Re: Boy, is net.politics busy these days... Message-ID: <2171@randvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Dec-84 11:31:29 EST Article-I.D.: randvax.2171 Posted: Tue Dec 4 11:31:29 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:18:23 EST References: <137@talcott.UUCP> <294@spp2.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica Lines: 20 Xref: watmath net.politics:6116 net.news.group:2613 >In fact, net.politics is about eight times as busy as, say, net.math or >net.physics. I suggest we split it up into some or all of the following: > > net.politics.abortion > net.politics.economic > net.politics.foreign > net.politics.nukes > net.politics.rights > net.politics.sevener :-) > > Greg Kuperberg I think creating a subgroup or two might not be a bad idea. As an initial experiment, I would propose creating net.politics.libertarian. This might cut down the traffic substantially. I don't think net.politics.abortion would help much. Abortion isn't strictly a political issue. I don't think anything is wrong with keeping net. abortion as it is. Lauri