Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!kaufman From: kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: What Does the NYT Say About BYU Rank Message-ID: <13000015@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Dec-84 12:25:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.13000015 Posted: Fri Dec 7 12:25:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 03:58:33 EST References: <142@ihu1m.UUCP> Lines: 22 Nf-ID: #R:ihu1m:-14200:uiucdcs:13000015:000:819 Nf-From: uiucdcs!kaufman Dec 7 11:25:00 1984 /* Written 3:48 am Dec 6, 1984 by citrin@ucbvax in uiucdcs:net.sport.foot */ Someone wanted to know the New York Times' computer rankings of college teams. Here it is from today's (12/5) paper, based on games through 12/1: ... 19) Rutgers (!) /* End of text from uiucdcs:net.sport.foot */ Why the exclamation point? Rutgers is my nominee for the annual we-got- screwed-out-of-a-bowl-appearance-award (pass the trophy on, East Carolina). While an Eastern counterpart with a comparable schedule and slightly inferior record, Army, goes to the Cherry Bowl, Rutgers, who beat them head-to-head this year, will spend the holidays in New Jersey. Bring back the Garden State Bowl? :-) This is no slight of the Cadets, but if they're going, there should be a place for Rutgers. Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)