Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site milo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!milo!eric From: eric@milo.UUCP (Eric Bergan) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: 2010 review--non spoiler Message-ID: <782@milo.UUCP> Date: Tue, 11-Dec-84 08:36:55 EST Article-I.D.: milo.782 Posted: Tue Dec 11 08:36:55 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Dec-84 02:15:43 EST References: <1193@bbncca.ARPA> <264@umd5.UUCP> Organization: JHU/Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD Lines: 11 Xref: watmath net.movies:5191 net.sf-lovers:5369 >Many people have argued that 2010 should not be judged against 2001, one >of the most influential movies of all time. Perhaps it IS an unfair >comparison, for 2010 is inferior in almost every respect. Actually, I don't think it is unfair at all. They are obviously reaping marketing benefits by being a sequel, they should also be prepared to take their lumps in comparison. -- eric ...!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!milo!eric