Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.lang.c,net.bugs.4bsd Subject: Re: Comparison failure in C compiler Message-ID: <6266@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Sat, 1-Dec-84 01:39:11 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6266 Posted: Sat Dec 1 01:39:11 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Dec-84 05:40:27 EST References: <438@aquila.noao.UUCP> <6196@brl-tgr.ARPA> <4088@elsie.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 9 Xref: godot net.unix-wizards:3919 net.lang.c:2062 net.bugs.4bsd:623 > > Why not use the current release of PCC instead? That is what I do; > > I quickly got tired of bugs like this in the one shipped with 4BSD. > > While some folks have the money and clout to keep constantly up-to-date, > others do have legitimate economic and legal reasons for using older tools. It doesn't take very many run-ins with the compiler to justify spending the $2500 (MAX) that it would've taken to replace it with a better one. About one reclaimed week of system staff time per year would cover this.