Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!jeffh From: jeffh@brl-tgr.ARPA (Jeff Hanes ) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Sargent's theory of neurosis Message-ID: <6220@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Fri, 30-Nov-84 08:54:06 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6220 Posted: Fri Nov 30 08:54:06 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Dec-84 05:55:42 EST References: <1344@ihuxq.UUCP> <1515@pucc-h> <707@watdcsu.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 36 Summary: >Believing falsehoods is not the same as believing lies, because not all >falsehoods are lies. Johnny, give this man a Doublespeak Award. The Oxford English Dictionary (Compact Edition) says, Falsehood: The intentional making of false statements; lying. > People *have* been known to make honest mistakes, True. You for instance (see above). >but I suppose this simple concept is beyond the intellectual grasp of the >average christianoid. I'm glad you admit we have *some* intellect. That's awfully generous, patient and/or tolerant of you. > Believing lies is not the same as lying to oneself, >if you have no way of knowing that you were told a lie. Makes it important to *seek* the truth, doesn't it? Or did someone already tell you what the truth is? >Were you born a fool, or did it take years of practice? I could ask you the same question, but I won't. > David Canzi, offended neurotic No comment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Fantome Straynger <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Unidentified Flaming Objection USnail: 508 Wheel Rd. UUCP: {seismo,decvax,unc}!brl-bmd!jeffh Bel Air, MD 21014 ARPA:(Is it safe to give this information?)