Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!pesnta!qumix!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!ix772 From: ix772@sdcc6.UUCP (Richard J. Willis) Newsgroups: net.women,net.women.only Subject: Re: proposed removal of net.women.only Message-ID: <1829@sdcc6.UUCP> Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 21:53:55 EST Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1829 Posted: Tue Nov 27 21:53:55 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 30-Nov-84 06:41:47 EST Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center Lines: 34 Xref: dcdwest net.women:2248 net.women.only:65 C ZZ > In article <209@calmasd.UUCP> gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan) writes: > >If David DiGiacomo doesn't want net.women.only on his own > >machine, he doesn't have to accept it from his news feed > >(assuming it is under his control). Likewise for those who > >agree with him that net.women.only is "a waste of net > >resources". > >Long Live Net.women.only! > >Gail Bayley Hanrahan > >{ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail > > Right. And if David is administrator for a backbone machine, it is ok > with you that everyone getting their newsfeed from him can do without > it also, right? > > How about if the name gets changed to net.rabid.feminists? > (As opposed to net.feminists, a name which implies that men > might be acceptable also?) > > I'm sure David D. wouldn't care about the group name, then. > What's that? The name is offensive? But it's only so that women > can have their own space without MEN interfering! > -- > "The weight of the world is love." -- Allan Ginsberg > > Rick Keir -- MicroComputer Information Center, MACC > 1210 West Dayton St/U Wisconsin Madison/Mad WI 53706 > > {allegra, ihnp4, seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!rick *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***