Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!jcp
From: jcp@brl-tgr.ARPA (Joe Pistritto )
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Lets get 1600 Penn. Ave on the net.
Message-ID: <6133@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 28-Nov-84 11:24:04 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6133
Posted: Wed Nov 28 11:24:04 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Nov-84 07:07:18 EST
References: <330@stcvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: jcp@brl-tgr.ARPA (Joe Pistritto )
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 25
Summary: 

In article <330@stcvax.UUCP> jps@stcvax.UUCP (Jeff Snover) writes:
>Is the white house (1600 Penn. ave.) on the net?  If it is not
>(as I suspect) how can we get it on?  It seems to me that they
>would be interested in getting feedback from as many people as
>possible and the net would be a perfect medium. (keep any flames
>about "the white house doesn't care" to yourself or else feel free
>to post them to /dev/null or anywhere else where I don't have to
>see them!!).
>
>I know that if I want to write to the white house I should pick
>up pen in hand and go for it via the US SNAIL but when it gets right
>down to it I usually won't because I fluked penmanship and I don't
>have a typewriter and to get to the point: its a pain in the ass!  The net
>is easy and fun to use and if I had a path to the white house I would
>mail them feedback on things pro and con on a fairly frequent basis
>and I think alot of other folks would do so also.
>
>What do you think guys? (colloquialism - implies women, wombats, wackballs)
>
>-- 
>Jeffrey P. Snover  -  STC StorageTek (Disk Division)
>uucp:	{ hao, ihnp4, decvax}!stcvax!jps
>	{ allegra, amd70, ucbvax }!nbires!stcvax!jps
>USnail:	Storage Technology Corp  -  MD 3T / Louisville, CO / 80028
>DDD:	(303) 673-6750