Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site rocksvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!rocksvax!z
From: z@rocksvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Gerald Owens on Liz Allen's Story (l
Message-ID: <11200003@rocksvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Dec-84 03:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: rocksvax.11200003
Posted: Mon Dec 10 03:09:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Dec-84 02:37:01 EST
References: <2234@stolaf.UUCP>
Lines: 33
Nf-ID: #R:stolaf:-223400:rocksvax:11200003:000:1290
Nf-From: rocksvax!z    Dec 10 03:09:00 1984


	I would imagine a pro-abortion movie would not show botched abortions
since even a 'pro' can blow one now and then.  If the abortions were illegal
it was more a problem of enforcing the laws that was the problem.  Thus the
movie Sophie mentioned could be interpreted the wrong way.

	A real pro-abortion movie should show the results of NOT having
an abortion, i.e. having a child.  I can picture the movie now:

Cold winter night.

Woman in labor drives car onto Sophie's farm.  She can't be put up in the
house since the house is filled with guests on Christmas Eve.  Sophie does
offer her the barn.

In the barn the child is born slightly after midnight.  The only thing
which keeps the child warm is the breath of the animals.

Later three of society's 'untouchables' visit to complete the insult.  The
retard from down the street brings a stupid toy.  The welfare case from
around the block brings a cheap meal.  The hitchhiker brings his dirty towel.
Grody to the max!

Of course it will then take a little bit of creative talent to show the
disruption to society that the child will bring and his suffering.  But
that might be better told as another story.

:-}
--
Hey, Santa, pass the bottle.
//Z\\
James M. Ziobro
Ziobro.Henr@Xerox.ARPA
{rochester,amd,sunybcs,allegra}!rocksvax!z