Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rti-sel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!rti-sel!rcb
From: rcb@rti-sel.UUCP (Randy Buckland)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.flame
Subject: Re: Kulawiec on Sargent on speaking in tongues
Message-ID: <25@rti-sel.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 10:09:39 EST
Article-I.D.: rti-sel.25
Posted: Tue Nov 27 10:09:39 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 29-Nov-84 05:57:48 EST
References: <231@pyuxd.UUCP> <1469@pucc-h>, <184@stat-l> <1489@pucc-h>, <191@stat-l> <1503@pucc-h> <198@stat-l>
Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC
Lines: 18

> 
> 	This is not a flame.  Rather, it is a substitute for a tactical
> nuclear weapon, which is an awful bother to carry about, doesn't fit
> through 1200 baud modems very well, and tends to cause a large amount
> of irration to those in the general vicinity of the target area.
> 
	.
	.
	.

	Lets hear it for a reasonable and logical approach to the
discussion. However, lets get the terminology right. That was a
strategic not tactical nuke. And it was the best argument for an
arms buildup I've ever seen. Put the nukes to good use.

					Randy Buckland
					Research Triangle Institute
					...!mcnc!rti-sel!rcb