Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/23/84; site ucbcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!faustus From: faustus@ucbcad.UUCP Newsgroups: net.origins,net.flame Subject: Re: Re: Creationists are stupid Message-ID: <2782@ucbcad.UUCP> Date: Sat, 10-Nov-84 14:59:50 EST Article-I.D.: ucbcad.2782 Posted: Sat Nov 10 14:59:50 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Nov-84 20:39:49 EST References: <447@uwmacc.UUCP> Organization: UC Berkeley CAD Group, Berkeley, CA Lines: 13 > If it were so obvious, I would agree that evolution is the best > explanation. Perhaps it is; but I don't think so. Certainly if it > *is* the best explanation, it is by no means obvious how it occurs. > If it were, evolutionists wouldn't be at such pains to disagree > with each other (that's not a slam at evolution, or science. But > it simply is not well understood how evolution occurs, if it occurs). Wrong, Bozo. It is obvious how it occurs, and the only people who say they don't understand it are people like you who don't want to understand it, or are too stupid to look beyond the pages of the Bible for anything. If you're so sure of creationism, explain to me how IT works. Wayne