Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/23/84; site ucbcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!faustus
From: faustus@ucbcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins,net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Creationists are stupid
Message-ID: <2782@ucbcad.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 10-Nov-84 14:59:50 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbcad.2782
Posted: Sat Nov 10 14:59:50 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Nov-84 20:39:49 EST
References: <447@uwmacc.UUCP>
Organization: UC Berkeley CAD Group, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 13

> If it were so obvious, I would agree that evolution is the best
> explanation.  Perhaps it is; but I don't think so.  Certainly if it
> *is* the best explanation, it is by no means obvious how it occurs.
> If it were, evolutionists wouldn't be at such pains to disagree
> with each other (that's not a slam at evolution, or science.  But
> it simply is not well understood how evolution occurs, if it occurs).

Wrong, Bozo. It is obvious how it occurs, and the only people who say
they don't understand it are people like you who don't want to understand
it, or are too stupid to look beyond the pages of the Bible for anything.
If you're so sure of creationism, explain to me how IT works.

	Wayne