Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wateng.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan From: jamcmullan@wateng.UUCP (Judy McMullan) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.relationships vs net.love_sex (a yes vote for either) Message-ID: <1611@wateng.UUCP> Date: Thu, 1-Nov-84 14:06:55 EST Article-I.D.: wateng.1611 Posted: Thu Nov 1 14:06:55 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 2-Nov-84 05:11:19 EST Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 13 Darryl Wagoner says: >I propose the instead of net.love_sex that the group be >net.relationship. This would cover all facets of love, sex, >marriage, living with one other, breaking up and all >of the other goodies. In fact, such a group was created many, many moons ago but it is not being used for the purpose it was intended for. It is net.social. People just continue to use net.singles!! --from the sssstickkky keyboard of JAM ...!{ihnp4|clyde|decvax}!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan