Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!grass
From: grass@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Re: Fantasia
Message-ID: <10000106@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 10:28:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.10000106
Posted: Fri Oct 26 10:28:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:03:47 EST
References: <210@pyuxd.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:pyuxd:-21000:uiucdcsb:10000106:000:497
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!grass    Oct 26 09:28:00 1984


<>

Stravinsky lost the case.  Essentially, the composition was not protected,
because Czarist Russia (and the USSR up to the mid 70's) did belong
to the international copyright system.  Stravinsky had essentially no 
rights to his work in the U.S.

As I heard the story, Disney more or less said to him:  Mr. Stravinsky,
we would like permission to use your work, but if you do not give us
permission, we will use it anyway.  Rather shabby.

					-- Judy Grass
					   Univ Of Illinois, Urbana