Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uokvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!lmaher From: lmaher@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <2200077@uokvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 23-Oct-84 03:12:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uokvax.2200077 Posted: Tue Oct 23 03:12:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 26-Oct-84 02:55:07 EDT References: <3774@decwrl.UUCP> Lines: 22 Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-377400:uokvax:2200077:37777777600:917 Nf-From: uokvax!lmaher Oct 23 02:12:00 1984 > | Ah yes, the "dark forces". Oh Ken [Arndt], if you ever get past philo. 101, > | please try "History of American Foreign Policy from WWII to Present." > | But watch out--you won't find any of your ample supply of "Captain > | America" comic books on the reading list! > | - Ken Perlow > > HEY! WATCH IT! You clearly haven't read any Captain America > comics since the Comics Code came into being, or you'd know that > the blind support of American imperialism has NOT been espoused > there (with exceptions when Jim Shooter pretends to write it) > since the end of the McCarthy era. > > Hutch (appalling literary ignorance, and a slur as well!) I entirely agree with Hutch that Ken Perlow is entirely offbase in denigrating Captain America. Flame Ken Arndt all you want (and rightfully so), but don't cast aspersions from sources you're not familiar with! Carl {allegra,ihnp4}!convex!ctvax!uokvax!lmaher