Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!lmaher
From: lmaher@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <2200077@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Oct-84 03:12:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.2200077
Posted: Tue Oct 23 03:12:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Oct-84 02:55:07 EDT
References: <3774@decwrl.UUCP>
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-377400:uokvax:2200077:37777777600:917
Nf-From: uokvax!lmaher    Oct 23 02:12:00 1984

> | Ah yes, the "dark forces".  Oh Ken [Arndt], if you ever get past philo. 101,
> | please try "History of American Foreign Policy from WWII to Present."
> | But watch out--you won't find any of your ample supply of "Captain
> | America" comic books on the reading list!
> |  - Ken Perlow
> 
> HEY!  WATCH IT!  You clearly haven't read any Captain America
> comics since the Comics Code came into being, or you'd know that
> the blind support of American imperialism has NOT been espoused
> there (with exceptions when Jim Shooter pretends to write it)
> since the end of the McCarthy era.
> 
> Hutch  (appalling literary ignorance, and a slur as well!)

I entirely agree with Hutch that Ken Perlow is entirely offbase
in denigrating Captain America.  Flame Ken Arndt all you want
(and rightfully so), but don't cast aspersions from sources
you're not familiar with!

Carl
{allegra,ihnp4}!convex!ctvax!uokvax!lmaher