Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: The atomic bomb
Message-ID: <3300068@ea.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Oct-84 17:25:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.3300068
Posted: Fri Oct 19 17:25:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Oct-84 01:44:33 EDT
References: <272@digi-g.UUCP>
Lines: 38
Nf-ID: #R:digi-g:-27200:ea:3300068:000:1738
Nf-From: ea!mwm Oct 19 16:25:00 1984
By popular demand, the following has flame-like overtones.
/***** ea:net.flame / digi-g!amir / 5:58 am Oct 6, 1984 */
> You are comparing a conventional war with a mass murder by a bomb. I really
> feel sorry for your kind.
Amir, you ignorant slut, "conventional war" *is* mass murder (oops, it's
been sanctioned by the state, so we have to call it "killing").
> You are trying to tell me that killing 450,000 people in a shot is ok. There
> is no way that that many people would have died in a conventional war.
I don't believe it - he quoted me saying that bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki
wasn't a good thing (see below) and can still make that statement. Amir,
I can believe that you don't read the articles you reply to, but you could
at least read the articles you write!
As for the number of people who would have died, you're displaying your
ignorance again. That number would have died if the US hadn't refrained
from bombing Hiroshima & Nagasaki (and others) so they could be used as
testing grounds for the bombs.
-------------------- promised quote --------------------
> Ok Ronnie. You did always believe that you could win a nuclear war.
We won one - you said so yourself, nitwit. Unlike you, I do try and
keep track of things other than "facts" to support my opinions, I know
that we probably couldn't survive an full-scale nuclear exchange. I prefer
not to find out - but I'll make an exception for you.