Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!grass From: grass@uiucdcsb.UUCP Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Re: Fantasia Message-ID: <10000106@uiucdcsb.UUCP> Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 10:28:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.10000106 Posted: Fri Oct 26 10:28:00 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:03:47 EST References: <210@pyuxd.UUCP> Lines: 15 Nf-ID: #R:pyuxd:-21000:uiucdcsb:10000106:000:497 Nf-From: uiucdcsb!grass Oct 26 09:28:00 1984 <> Stravinsky lost the case. Essentially, the composition was not protected, because Czarist Russia (and the USSR up to the mid 70's) did belong to the international copyright system. Stravinsky had essentially no rights to his work in the U.S. As I heard the story, Disney more or less said to him: Mr. Stravinsky, we would like permission to use your work, but if you do not give us permission, we will use it anyway. Rather shabby. -- Judy Grass Univ Of Illinois, Urbana