Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ih4ep.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!ih4ep!semreb
From: semreb@ih4ep.UUCP (Waz Nardbill)
Newsgroups: net.origins,net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Creationists are stupid
Message-ID: <115@ih4ep.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 5-Nov-84 16:22:52 EST
Article-I.D.: ih4ep.115
Posted: Mon Nov  5 16:22:52 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Nov-84 05:22:55 EST
References: <222@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <261@we53.UUCP> <1096@bbncca.ARPA> <552@pucc-k>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 6


    The inability to prove one notion cannot be used to prove another
  It seems that what you are saying is that because
 one idea cannot be proven, the "alternative" must be true.
 Your logic is highly questionable.
          Terry Bermes