Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site ea.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm From: mwm@ea.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: mod.flame Message-ID: <21500004@ea.UUCP> Date: Sun, 21-Oct-84 23:56:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ea.21500004 Posted: Sun Oct 21 23:56:00 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 25-Oct-84 03:16:04 EDT References: <1616@nsc.UUCP> Lines: 24 Nf-ID: #R:nsc:-161600:ea:21500004:000:965 Nf-From: ea!mwm Oct 21 22:56:00 1984 /***** ea:net.news.group / nsc!chongo / 4:56 pm Oct 18, 1984 */ While we are on the subject, why not have a mod.flame. Net.flame is too full of repeated long dragged out discussions. Mod.flame would give a lower volume sample of things people flame about. chongo <*smYle*> /\--/\ -- ~ Why not make UN*X source be public domain? ~ J. Alton 84' /* ---------- */ Ok - who do I apply to to start moderating (unmoderate? domoderate?) mod.flame? Gee, just think - a flame list with no rational discussions, no celtic stuff (a disjoint set from rational discussions), no politiking, no nuking, etc. Come to think of it, mod.jokes might not be a bad idea, either. To censor out the jokes that have appeared before, and *only* to censor such jokes. Said person could also make sure any offensive jokes were rotated [which means in practice rotate everything that moves]. He would *not* censor jokes because they were "not funny", or were "offensive".