Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!bentley!hoxna!houxm!ihnp4!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP ( Zonker T. Chuqui )
Newsgroups: mod.singles
Subject: Anonymous postings in mod.singles
Message-ID: <1783@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Oct-84 17:09:32 EST
Article-I.D.: nsc.1783
Posted: Mon Oct 29 17:09:32 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 31-Oct-84 00:16:07 EST
Sender: chuqui@nsc.UUCP
Organization: The Warlocks Cave, Western Annex
Lines: 25
Approved: chuqui@nsc.UUCP

- - - mod.singles- - -          - - - Volume 1, Issue 20 - - -

> >  Phil Ngai
> > mod.singles SUCKS! Why are all the frigging articles anonymous?
> 
> So far, the anonymity has been my only real problem with the group.
> Unfortunately it is a rather critical problem.
> 
>     Analogy: a group of people carry on a long-going free-form discussion.
> They are bothered by harassers, so they go somewhere else that the harassers
> can't get to. ("but i LIKE watching harassment"). So far so good, but losing
> each others identity sure does take a lot of the sparkle out of things.

The number of anonymous postings as a percentage of mod.singles is
dropping. One reason the percentage was so high to start was because there
are a few people out on the net who have been silenced by less than
supportive administrations and who are now using the anonymous feature of
mod.singles to post their comments safely. My preference is that articles
posted to mod.singles NOT be anonymous, but that isn't always possible.

chuq
-- 
Mod.singles postings should be mailed to 'nsc!singles'
administrivia should be mailed to 'nsc!singles-request'
nsc talks to {cbosgd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}