Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wateng.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan
From: jamcmullan@wateng.UUCP (Judy McMullan)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.relationships vs net.love_sex (a yes vote for either)
Message-ID: <1611@wateng.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 1-Nov-84 14:06:55 EST
Article-I.D.: wateng.1611
Posted: Thu Nov  1 14:06:55 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Nov-84 05:11:19 EST
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 13

Darryl Wagoner says:

	>I propose the instead of net.love_sex that the group be
	>net.relationship. This would cover all facets of love, sex,
	>marriage, living with one other, breaking up and all
	>of the other goodies. 

In fact, such a group was created many, many moons ago but it is not being
used for the purpose it was intended for. It is net.social. People just
continue to use net.singles!!

   --from the sssstickkky keyboard of JAM
   ...!{ihnp4|clyde|decvax}!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan