Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rayssd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!wjh12!foxvax1!brunix!rayssd!dpw
From: dpw@rayssd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: net.relationships vs net.love_sex (a yes vote for either)
Message-ID: <539@rayssd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 22-Oct-84 11:30:43 EST
Article-I.D.: rayssd.539
Posted: Mon Oct 22 11:30:43 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:38:37 EST
Distribution: net.followup
Organization: Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI
Lines: 30

>> line for the great love_sex god <<

Since I was not able to see the original submittion for net.love_sex
I don't know what was  proposed.   I will  throw  my two cents worth in
anyway.

I think that such a  group is much needed.   I propose  the  instead of
net.love_sex  that  the  group  be  net.relationship.  This would cover
all facets  of love,  sex, marriage, living with one other, breaking up
and all  of the  other goodies.   Please no flames.   I know  that this
is covered in  part by net.singles.   I also  feel that  net.singles is
getting a lot of what  should be in such a group but net.singles is the
closest thing to it and  has therefore  became a catch-all for anything
to do with interpersonal relationship.   With it being broader it opens
up the subject to  all aspects  of interpersonal relationships.  I feel
that I have a lot  to learn  about dealing  with people.   It  would be
very nice to have a news group devoted to the subject of relationships.
Outside  of sex there is not to much different between husband and wife
type  relationship and  any other  relationship.  I understand that the
degree of the feeling and involvement  are  different but  a lot of the
problems are same.

submitted for your approval.

Darryl Wagoner

decvax!brunix                     land line: 401-847-8000 x4089
allegra-------\			  home line: 401-849-5730
               ---- !rayssd!dpw
linus-------/