Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rayssd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!wjh12!foxvax1!brunix!rayssd!dpw From: dpw@rayssd.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: net.relationships vs net.love_sex (a yes vote for either) Message-ID: <539@rayssd.UUCP> Date: Mon, 22-Oct-84 11:30:43 EST Article-I.D.: rayssd.539 Posted: Mon Oct 22 11:30:43 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:38:37 EST Distribution: net.followup Organization: Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI Lines: 30 >> line for the great love_sex god << Since I was not able to see the original submittion for net.love_sex I don't know what was proposed. I will throw my two cents worth in anyway. I think that such a group is much needed. I propose the instead of net.love_sex that the group be net.relationship. This would cover all facets of love, sex, marriage, living with one other, breaking up and all of the other goodies. Please no flames. I know that this is covered in part by net.singles. I also feel that net.singles is getting a lot of what should be in such a group but net.singles is the closest thing to it and has therefore became a catch-all for anything to do with interpersonal relationship. With it being broader it opens up the subject to all aspects of interpersonal relationships. I feel that I have a lot to learn about dealing with people. It would be very nice to have a news group devoted to the subject of relationships. Outside of sex there is not to much different between husband and wife type relationship and any other relationship. I understand that the degree of the feeling and involvement are different but a lot of the problems are same. submitted for your approval. Darryl Wagoner decvax!brunix land line: 401-847-8000 x4089 allegra-------\ home line: 401-849-5730 ---- !rayssd!dpw linus-------/