Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ih4ep.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!ih4ep!semreb From: semreb@ih4ep.UUCP (Waz Nardbill) Newsgroups: net.origins,net.flame Subject: Re: Re: Creationists are stupid Message-ID: <115@ih4ep.UUCP> Date: Mon, 5-Nov-84 16:22:52 EST Article-I.D.: ih4ep.115 Posted: Mon Nov 5 16:22:52 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Nov-84 05:22:55 EST References: <222@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <261@we53.UUCP> <1096@bbncca.ARPA> <552@pucc-k> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 6 The inability to prove one notion cannot be used to prove another It seems that what you are saying is that because one idea cannot be proven, the "alternative" must be true. Your logic is highly questionable. Terry Bermes