Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site wlcrjs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!wlcrjs!jwiz
From: jwiz@wlcrjs.UUCP (John R. Petersen)
Newsgroups: net.singles,net.flame
Subject: Re: RE:trust abuse
Message-ID: <375@wlcrjs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Oct-84 04:57:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: wlcrjs.375
Posted: Fri Oct 12 04:57:01 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 06:53:52 EDT
References: <883@ihuxe.UUCP> <401@pucc-k>
Reply-To: jwiz@wlcrjs.UUCP (John R. Petersen)
Followup-To: <401@pucc-k>
Distribution: net
Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 13

[Yumm...yumm to the blank line eaters]

In article <401@pucc-k> agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta) writes:
>
>It bothers me to see all the people who have to pick on wording and
>can't call a game a game. Always have to find soething more serious and
>less realistic to cal it ...

Have you read any of the documentation on the use/etiquette of
USENET??  That's why rules were made in the first place...to
eliminate replys due to conflicts of the meaning of words/phrases.
If you haven't already, I would suggest you read net.announce.newusers
thoughly.