Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!ron From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie) Newsgroups: net.cse Subject: Re: CS students unexposed to C Message-ID: <5169@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 10-Oct-84 14:49:38 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.5169 Posted: Wed Oct 10 14:49:38 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Oct-84 05:09:40 EDT References: <2460@dartvax.UUCP> Organization: Ballistics Research Lab Lines: 19 Your comments are in violent agreement with the previous ones. Anyone who graduates with a CS degree these days and hasn't learned at least a little about UNIX shows the major problem with places claiming to have a computer science department. Any serious Operating Systems program would have case studies of several operating systems (of course when I was studying it was stuff like VM and EXEC-8). However, as prominent as UNIX is, and the fact that it is an approach rather than an implementation (many people argue that the implementation sucks), it should be part of the curriculum. It is amazing that you can still get CS grads who only know the PASCAL on the O/S that they were allowed to use, and not any kind of diversity. The ACM attempts to reform this are meeting with dissent from the chincier CS departments. -Ron