Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1h.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!mhuxj!ihnp4!ihu1h!ajaym
From: ajaym@ihu1h.UUCP (Jay Mitchell)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics
Subject: Re: ERA
Message-ID: <349@ihu1h.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 22:48:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihu1h.349
Posted: Wed Sep 19 22:48:36 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:26:15 EDT
References: <319@hou2g.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 9

I, for one, fit that category. I think the ERA is vague at best and does
not do the need justice. Too many "what ifs" arise from a vague document
especially one which will be used in court. Being a bit more specific and
to the point will do the ERA and the women it should protect the most good.
-- 
				    -------------------------
					Jay Mitchell
					ihnp4!ihu1h!ajaym
				    -------------------------