Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 Fluke 8/7/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!microsoft!fluke!moriarty
From: moriarty@fluke.UUCP (Jeff Meyer)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: What is sensitivity good for anyway?
Message-ID: <1389@vax2.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Sep-84 13:50:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax2.1389
Posted: Mon Sep 24 13:50:55 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 03:28:37 EDT
References: randvax.1970, <2647@mit-eddie.UUCP>, <1318@browngr.UUCP> <1989@randvax.UUCP> <928@hammer.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, WA
Lines: 31

>} ] I think the major effect of being sensitive is that women
>} ] will end up feeling a little guilty when they kick your
>} ] teeth in, rather than just complacently doing it.   :-|
>} 
>} If that really *is* your attitude, then I don't blame them one bit
>} for ``kicking your teeth in''.
>} 
>} 		-Ed Hall
>} 		decvaxe!randvax!edhall
>
>Let X be the name of the original poster, which I have forgotten.
>
>Assume, for the moment, that X's teeth really have been kicked in,
>and that this action would not normally be acceptable behavior (although
>I accept that it's the norm).  Then how does X's theories on the
>motivation behind this action change the blame?
>
>		Ed Sznyter
>		tektronix!tekecs!ews

It doesn't unless.... X IS A DENTIST!

				Ta-dump Ta-dump (Take my car, please...)

					Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
					John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
UUCP:
 {cornell,decvax,ihnp4,sdcsvax,tektronix,utcsrgv}!uw-beaver \
    {allegra,gatech!sb1,hplabs!lbl-csam,decwrl!sun,ssc-vax} -- !fluke!moriarty
ARPA:
	fluke!moriarty@uw-beaver.ARPA