Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (Chevrolet Chabot)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: On the Interpretation of "girl"
Message-ID: <3777@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 16:24:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.3777
Posted: Fri Sep 28 16:24:12 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:19:42 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 13

Mark L. Bowen  ==  >
> Concerning calling "women" "girl", anyone ever consider that for us "younger"
> types that most females we have associated with for most of our lives have
> actually BEEN girls? 

By "us 'younger' types", you mean you "boys"?

-----------------
Let's call a Trey of Swords a Trey of Swords:
L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA  01752