Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cepu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrba!cepu!scw
From: scw@cepu.UUCP (Stephen C. Woods)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.2bsd,net.bugs.uucp,net.unix-wizards
Subject: 2.9BSD uucico   s l o w n e s s
Message-ID: <350@cepu.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 12:38:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: cepu.350
Posted: Fri Sep 28 12:38:43 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:16:17 EDT
Reply-To: scw@cepu.UUCP (Stephen C. Woods)
Organization: VA Wadsworth Med. Center; LA CA
Lines: 24
Xref: 106 333 9692

**<- squished bugs
There seems to be a major problem with the 2.9BSD implementation of uucico
on 1200 baud lines talking to 2 different 2.9BSD systems we're only getting:

With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) total data 294648 bytes 12924 secs = 22.80 CPS
With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) recieved data 0 bytes 0 secs 
With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) sent data 294648 bytes 12924 secs = 22.80 CPS

With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) total data 1874341 bytes 85608 secs = 21.89 CPS
With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) recieved data 4422 bytes 279 secs = 15.85 CPS
With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) sent data 1869919 bytes 85329 secs = 21.91 CPS

Typically with other systems (V7, sysIII, 4.xBSD, and Locus) that I
talk to at 1200 baud the Gross Xfer rate is ~100 CPS. Even the V7
system that I talk to at 300 baud is faster (~27 CPS).

Has anyone else seen this problem?  If so are there any fixes available?
Please respond directly to me, I'll post a summary (and any fixes that we
discover) to the net.
Thanks in advance.
-- 
Stephen C. Woods (VA Wadsworth Med Ctr./UCLA Dept. of Neurology)
uucp:	{ {ihnp4, uiucdcs}!bradley, hao, trwrb, sdcrdcf}!cepu!scw
ARPA: cepu!scw@ucla-cs location: N 34 3' 9.1" W 118 27' 4.3"