Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Christianity, sex Message-ID: <87@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Sun, 23-Sep-84 21:13:34 EDT Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.87 Posted: Sun Sep 23 21:13:34 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 08:16:19 EDT References: <9646@brunix.UUCP> Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 18 > RE: 'There is a difference bettween making love and fucking' > Jeff Sargent, in his reply on this subject assumes an implicit value > judgement between the two. This is a value judgement that I often hear > people make, but my personal experience finds that judgement quite bogus. > Making love is obviously a wonderful thing, and I'd be the first to laud > it as a fullfilling, deep experience. I'd even go so far as to say that > it is in some way 'better' than just fucking. BUT that does not mean > that fucking is bad. Fucking can be extremely pleasurable for all parties > involved, and there's nothing wrong with that. Tuna isn't as good as > Lobster, but there's no reason you can't enjoy both! The problem is that in Christianity, the difference between the two is more akin to the difference between a cup of tea for breakfast and a shot of heroin after lunch. C. Wingate