Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!hammer!ews
From: ews@hammer.UUCP (Ed Sznyter)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: What is sensitivity good for anyway?
Message-ID: <928@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 17:31:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: hammer.928
Posted: Fri Sep 21 17:31:40 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 01:37:10 EDT
References: randvax.1970, <2647@mit-eddie.UUCP>, <1318@browngr.UUCP> <1989@randvax.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 21


} ] I think the major effect of being sensitive is that women
} ] will end up feeling a little guilty when they kick your
} ] teeth in, rather than just complacently doing it.   :-|
} 
} If that really *is* your attitude, then I don't blame them one bit
} for ``kicking your teeth in''.
} 
} 		-Ed Hall
} 		decvaxe!randvax!edhall

Let X be the name of the original poster, which I have forgotten.

Assume, for the moment, that X's teeth really have been kicked in,
and that this action would not normally be acceptable behavior (although
I accept that it's the norm).  Then how does X's theories on the
motivation behind this action change the blame?

		Ed Sznyter
		tektronix!tekecs!ews
		tekecs!ews%tektronix@csnet-relay.csnet