Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrba!cepu!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Rules question
Message-ID: <1190@hao.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 22:55:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1190
Posted: Fri Oct  5 22:55:48 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Oct-84 09:14:18 EDT
References: uwmacc.317 <9652@brunix.UUCP> <245@we53.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 20

> What I mean, if
> my metaphor applies, is that the evolotionary theory arose out of an
> unqualified rejection of the idea of a creator, specifically *the*
> Creator of the Judeo-Christian teachings.  The rejection stemmed from
> the logical conclusion that if He existed, then He had something to say
> about how I live My life, something that Darwin et al. had a personal
> problem with, as do the evolutionists of today.

I don't suppose you can back up this incredible statement with
any documentary evidence.  But then why should you?  Creationists
don't seem to have to follow rules of logic or anything else.
That statement is no crazier than any of the rest of the unsubstatiated
garbage we've been seeing in this newsgroup.

-- 
Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307