Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 SMI; site sun.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!decwrl!sunny
From: sunny@sun.uucp (Sunny Kirsten)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: what's rape?
Message-ID: <1700@sun.uucp>
Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 13:58:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.1700
Posted: Fri Sep 21 13:58:25 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:23:29 EDT
References: <459@hou5g.UUCP> <1143@drutx.UUCP>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 9

[]
	Yes, the double standard exists, particularly in connotations
associated with descriptive terms.  Can anyone seriously suggest that
"bachelor" has any of the negative connotations of the equivalent feminine
"slut"?  These two equivalent terms carry the implied connotations that
promiscuity is ok for men, but not for women.  What did you expect?
Equality?
-- 
{ucbvax,decvax,ihnp4}!sun!sunny (Sunny :-> Kirsten of Sun Microsystems Inc.)