Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: A little light humor.  Or, perhaps, tragedy.
Message-ID: <939@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 14:45:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.939
Posted: Tue Sep 18 14:45:31 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 08:43:58 EDT
References: <98@rlgvax.UUCP> <927@ut-ngp.UUCP> <528@oliven.UUCP>
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 16

[]

> She isn't denying aid, she is actively acting against another and his property
> rights.  Destroying the fetus is an even greater violation of its property
> rights than hanging around for a few months is a violation of the women's
> rights.
>
> -- 
> [hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk

So if I pitch a tent, without permission, on someone else's property, I
have the right to squat there until I decide I don't need to use the
land anymore.  Got a back yard, hawk?  The fetus is within the woman;
it is allocating her resources.  The woman's property rights take
precedence.