Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!oliven!hawk From: hawk@oliven.UUCP Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Re: A little light humor. Or, perhaps, tragedy. Message-ID: <528@oliven.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 19:32:12 EDT Article-I.D.: oliven.528 Posted: Fri Sep 14 19:32:12 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 02:28:18 EDT References: <277@uwmacc.UUCP> <919@ut-ngp.UUCP> <98@rlgvax.UUCP> <927@ut-ngp.UUCP> Organization: University of Waikiki Lines: 14 > Obviously the woman's right to abort the baby >derives from her right to control her body. By "recover control", >I meant that she should be able, if she so desires, to forbid any >particular use of her property, and that she should be able to >enforce her choices, even if that means denying aid to another. She isn't denying aid, she is actively acting against another and his property rights. Destroying the fetus is an even greater violation of its property rights than hanging around for a few months is a violation of the women's rights. -- [hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk