Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!oliven!hawk
From: hawk@oliven.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: A little light humor.  Or, perhaps, tragedy.
Message-ID: <528@oliven.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 19:32:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: oliven.528
Posted: Fri Sep 14 19:32:12 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 02:28:18 EDT
References: <277@uwmacc.UUCP> <919@ut-ngp.UUCP> <98@rlgvax.UUCP> <927@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Organization: University of Waikiki
Lines: 14


> Obviously the woman's right to abort the baby
>derives from her right to control her body.  By "recover control",
>I meant that she should be able, if she so desires, to forbid any
>particular use of her property, and that she should be able to
>enforce her choices, even if that means denying aid to another.

She isn't denying aid, she is actively acting against another and his property
rights.  Destroying the fetus is an even greater violation of its property
rights than hanging around for a few months is a violation of the women's
rights.

-- 
[hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk