Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!sri-unix!RSHAPIRO@BBNA.ARPA From: RSHAPIRO@BBNA.ARPA Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: SWL-oriented messages Message-ID: <12601@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 17:34:57 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12601 Posted: Tue Oct 2 17:34:57 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 08:24:11 EDT Lines: 13 From: Richard ShapiroCan we agree that SWL-oriented messages are OK, but that they should feature the letters "SWL" in the subject field? I think it's quite a reasonable policy in general to spend some effort in making the subject field as descriptive as a few words allow. A new mailing list does not sound feasible. The thanks for clarification, by the way, should go to Will Martin rather than to me. I was only the forwarder. richard -------