Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:agz
From: agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics
Subject: Re: ERA
Message-ID: <376@pucc-k>
Date: Wed, 3-Oct-84 04:41:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: pucc-k.376
Posted: Wed Oct  3 04:41:40 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 01:47:06 EDT
References: <319@hou2g.UUCP> <334@pucc-k> <385@ihuxo.UUCP>
Organization: Alcohol Design and Application Corp.
Lines: 19



> Having the Equal Rights Amendment would give women a tool to use 
> in court for proving discrimination.  

Wrong again! The ERA simply says that no laws shall be written at any
legislative level discriminating against women. It has no definiton of
what discrimination is, ie dress codes discussed earlier. It still
remains up to the court to decide what is discrimination and what isn't.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Banta			{decvax!allegra!inhp4}!pucc-k!agz
Alcohol Design and Application Corp. --- Serving people over 21 years.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The evidence before the court is quite incontrovertable.
 There's no need for the jury to retire.
 In all my years of judging I have never heard before
 Anything more worthy of the full penaly of the the law ... "