Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe
From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Christianity, sex
Message-ID: <87@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 23-Sep-84 21:13:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.87
Posted: Sun Sep 23 21:13:34 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 08:16:19 EDT
References: <9646@brunix.UUCP>
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 18

> RE: 'There is a difference bettween making love and fucking'

> Jeff Sargent, in his reply on this subject assumes an implicit value
> judgement between the two.  This is a value judgement that I often hear
> people make, but my personal experience finds that judgement quite bogus.

> Making love is obviously a wonderful thing, and I'd be the first to laud
> it as a fullfilling, deep experience.  I'd even go so far as to say that
> it is in some way 'better' than just fucking.  BUT that does not mean
> that fucking is bad.  Fucking can be extremely pleasurable for all parties
> involved, and there's nothing wrong with that.  Tuna isn't as good as
> Lobster, but there's no reason you can't enjoy both!

The problem is that in Christianity, the difference between the two is more
akin to the difference between a cup of tea for breakfast and a shot of
heroin after lunch.

C. Wingate