Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Re: The Sub-Minimum Wage Again
Message-ID: <22400008@ea.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 09:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.22400008
Posted: Wed Sep 19 09:19:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 21:17:32 EDT
References: <485@tty3b.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:tty3b:-48500:ea:22400008:000:548
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Sep 19 08:19:00 1984

/***** ea:net.politics / tty3b!mjk /  6:31 pm  Sep  6, 1984 */
The "right-to-work"  argument is a management red herring.

Mike Kelly
/* ---------- */

I love it. For people outside the union, the right to work is a management
red herring, and all they get is the right to starve. For people inside the
union, the right to work is "job security," and a major bargaining point.
Syjigm at its finest.

Come on, Mike - tell us one more time how union monopolies are good for
society.  If you repeat it often enough, you may hypnotize us, too.