Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uicsl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsl!keller
From: keller@uicsl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: A commom senerio.
Message-ID: <28100017@uicsl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Oct-84 15:59:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uicsl.28100017
Posted: Thu Oct 11 15:59:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 07:08:36 EDT
References: <408@tpvax.UUCP>
Lines: 45
Nf-ID: #R:tpvax:-40800:uicsl:28100017:000:2411
Nf-From: uicsl!keller    Oct 11 14:59:00 1984

[for emergency use only]

I was away from net.politics for a month and upon my return I had the
unfortunate impulse to read all of the months entries--the result:
my brain hurts! To give you the feeling of revulsion I have I liken it
to watching Ron Reagan fumble around trying to say something coherent
during the first "debate."

Now, I don't think that net.politics is unique among notesfiles by being
full of entries that bespeak a lack of knowledge. Nor do I believe that
the participants are dull witted. What I do believe is that most of the
users don't know that they are very poorly informed. Part of the reason
that I believe this is that shortly after I made my first entries in
net.politics I received a tremendous amount of criticism about what I
had said and I found that I needed to think quite a bit harder about
what I was going to say if I ever made another entry. I have continued
to make entries some of which I am proud of and some of which I wonder
whether I should have made (it is very hard not to start flaming away about
politics). But believe me when I tell you that spouting an opinion without
having several good sources to back you up is worse than wasted breath.

This brings me to the topic of news sources. I remember a debate I
participated in where the opponents sole source was Newsweek. I thought
that was the pinnacle of narrow-mindedness, but the debate judge didn't
seem too upset by it. If you have been following net.politics for a while
you have heard of several cases of creative editing of stories in the
major news magazines and papers. This doesn't mean that you can never
trust what you read only that you shouldn't be surprised to find someone
who tells you a completely different story (especially about foreign
affairs). My friend Jordan thinks that there is nothing true ever printed
in the National Review, but he is wrong just as one cannot claim that
an liberal magazine is always full of junk. I have found that if you want
to get close to the truth you have to find several good books and read them;
it just requires more effort to write books than articles so they tend to be
better.

If any of you think that TV news can inform you on any substantial topic then
I want you to read this quote:

	"I don't think anyone can get anything--enough information
	about anything--out of television to make a full, informed
	judgement." Tom Brokaw (NBC)

-Shaun