Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rlgvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!rlgvax!guy
From: guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Recovery possible from signal aborted write(2) ?
Message-ID: <144@rlgvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Sep-84 20:38:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: rlgvax.144
Posted: Mon Sep 24 20:38:17 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Sep-84 04:21:03 EDT
References: <3253@ecsvax.UUCP>, <138@rlgvax.UUCP> <45@cithep.UucP>
Organization: CCI Office Systems Group, Reston, VA
Lines: 11

> By the way, is there any reason to not have u directly readable?
> It's been that way for about two years here at cithep, but I think
> only two or three people know it!

The source to the System III "make" has a reference to a "getu" system
call from Columbus UNIX, which looks like it was intended to permit a
process to read its own U area; anybody from BTL Columbus have any
comments?

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy