Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!oliven!rap
From: rap@oliven.UUCP (Robert A. Pease)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.motss
Subject: Re: Logical Arguments
Message-ID: <641@oliven.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 16:04:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: oliven.641
Posted: Fri Oct  5 16:04:16 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Oct-84 21:15:38 EDT
References: <186@usfbobo.UUCP>
Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca
Lines: 16

.

>I make no pretence of using "logical" or "reasonable" arguments.
>I don't know what a "reductionist" argument is and don't care.
>If you ever see a "logical argument" in my writing it is an accident.
> ...
>
>--
>David Brunson, Master of Netsmanship

Then by your own admission, you haven't got a leg to stand on.
Why do you bother?
-- 

					Robert A. Pease
    {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!rap