Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!gwyn@BRL-VLD.ARPA
From: gwyn@BRL-VLD.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re:  sh vs csh
Message-ID: <12124@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 05:16:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12124
Posted: Tue Sep 18 05:16:42 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 07:37:08 EDT
Lines: 8

From:      Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) 

Personally I think the Bourne shell functions are better than Cshell
aliases.  I am having a fine time with my UNIX System V Release 2
shell.  Even better, Ron Natalie added job control to it.  Now, if
we could figure out a good way to edit command history (Cshell !
stuff is not the right way), we could junk csh altogether.  Anybody
have a good history mechanism for the Bourne shell?  (It's hard..)