Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site calmasd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!calmasd!gail
From: gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan)
Newsgroups: net.abortion,net.women
Subject: Re: I am pro-choice, dare you claim the same?
Message-ID: <180@calmasd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 20:14:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: calmasd.180
Posted: Fri Sep 21 20:14:27 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:34:03 EDT
References: <8988@watmath.UUCP>
Organization: Calma Company, San Diego, CA
Lines: 21


>Likewise on funding.  How can you claim to be pro-choice, and at the
>same time insist that those anti-abortionists be forced on pain of prison
>to pay for abortions!  Where's the advocacy of choice in that?
> 	Brad Templeton


Some of those same anti-abortionists are "forcing" me to pay for MX
missiles and weaponry that *I* don't want. :)

This whole "I don't want my tax money to go for xyz" thing is
fallacious.  It's just as easy to think of your tax money
as paying for something you do support.  (But not as interesting
rhetorically.)


	Gail Bayley Hanrahan
	{decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail
	Calma Company, San Diego