Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cepu.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrba!cepu!scw From: scw@cepu.UUCP (Stephen C. Woods) Newsgroups: net.bugs.2bsd,net.bugs.uucp,net.unix-wizards Subject: 2.9BSD uucico s l o w n e s s Message-ID: <350@cepu.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 12:38:43 EDT Article-I.D.: cepu.350 Posted: Fri Sep 28 12:38:43 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:16:17 EDT Reply-To: scw@cepu.UUCP (Stephen C. Woods) Organization: VA Wadsworth Med. Center; LA CA Lines: 24 Xref: 106 333 9692 **<- squished bugs There seems to be a major problem with the 2.9BSD implementation of uucico on 1200 baud lines talking to 2 different 2.9BSD systems we're only getting: With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) total data 294648 bytes 12924 secs = 22.80 CPS With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) recieved data 0 bytes 0 secs With ucla-an (09/27-15:25) sent data 294648 bytes 12924 secs = 22.80 CPS With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) total data 1874341 bytes 85608 secs = 21.89 CPS With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) recieved data 4422 bytes 279 secs = 15.85 CPS With ucla-ci (09/27-15:25) sent data 1869919 bytes 85329 secs = 21.91 CPS Typically with other systems (V7, sysIII, 4.xBSD, and Locus) that I talk to at 1200 baud the Gross Xfer rate is ~100 CPS. Even the V7 system that I talk to at 300 baud is faster (~27 CPS). Has anyone else seen this problem? If so are there any fixes available? Please respond directly to me, I'll post a summary (and any fixes that we discover) to the net. Thanks in advance. -- Stephen C. Woods (VA Wadsworth Med Ctr./UCLA Dept. of Neurology) uucp: { {ihnp4, uiucdcs}!bradley, hao, trwrb, sdcrdcf}!cepu!scw ARPA: cepu!scw@ucla-cs location: N 34 3' 9.1" W 118 27' 4.3"