Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!kaufman From: kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: ERA Support? Message-ID: <36200160@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 14:30:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.36200160 Posted: Tue Oct 9 14:30:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Oct-84 07:37:18 EDT References: <161@rlgvax.UUCP> Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R:rlgvax:-16100:uiucdcs:36200160:000:648 Nf-From: uiucdcs!kaufman Oct 9 13:30:00 1984 [Disable the monarchy - stop kissing frogs!] No, Jeff, you've interpreted what I was saying all wrong. I was arguing on the assumption that somebody was an ERA supporter before, and no more; I had no interest in arguing the actual principles of the Amendment. What I was saying was that one should not be against it ON ACCOUNT OF THE FACT THAT IT WAS NOT ADDED TO THE CONSTITUTION, nothing more. The issue is not dead - only the recent campaign to enact it. Issues don't die. (They do sometimes fade away :-) ) I do not attempt to deny that people have and had good reasons for supporting and opposing ERA. Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)