Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-h Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:rsk From: rsk@pucc-h (Rich Kulawiec) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Sunflower Farm Party Review Message-ID: <1217@pucc-h> Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 03:21:46 EDT Article-I.D.: pucc-h.1217 Posted: Wed Sep 19 03:21:46 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 08:46:02 EDT References: <1359@ihuxl.UUCP> <1211@pucc-h> Organization: Purdue, THE Indiana University Lines: 21 From Jeff Sargent (aeq@pucc-h) > In many ways, I'd a darn sight rather use PROCSY (Purdue Remote On-line Console > SYstem, the home-grown terminal system on Purdue's CDC 6000's) than Unix. > Chief reason is, of course, that a Vax is not a computer, and thus does not > function with more that 15 users on it; hence Unix loses much of its appeal. > The 6000's are real computers with hair on their chests; they'd probably be > fast even running Unix! But this is not the group to flame about the obvious > performance deficiencies of Unix and Vaxen. However, I think I'd still say > the same thing even if I were not the Purdue staff member principally > responsible for the maintenance of PROCSY.... Fine, Jeff...I'll be happy to turn off NetNews on Unix; you can bring it up on PROCSY. :-) ...snarl... :-) -- ---Rsk UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs } !pur-ee!rsk { decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk Not fade away...