Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ritcv.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!spw2562 From: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: re: final argument Message-ID: <1291@ritcv.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Oct-84 14:40:58 EDT Article-I.D.: ritcv.1291 Posted: Thu Oct 4 14:40:58 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Oct-84 02:02:51 EDT Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY Lines: 16 > The very existence of fairly reliable birth control indicates >that an unwanted pregnancy is not necessarily a risk associated with sex. >Pregnancy is neither a necessary risk nor a necessary consequence of sex. >There is, therefore, no such "risk" or "consequences" as you refer to. You're saying birth control eliminates risk of pregnancy? Then why the need for abortion? >BTW, when you drive down the highway, you take the risk that you will lose >control of your car and hit a bridge (or other large object). Are you saying that the natural result of driving a care is hitting a bridge (or other large object)? And don't tell my abortion is a natural result of intercourse. Abortion is simply a way people have come up with to keep from having to bear (no pun intended) the consequences. A cop-out as Mark Modig put it.