Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!houxe!drutx!druxi!bml From: bml@druxi.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: On the Interpretation of "girl" Message-ID: <772@druxi.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Sep-84 17:03:17 EDT Article-I.D.: druxi.772 Posted: Thu Sep 20 17:03:17 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 20:18:45 EDT References: <212@gitpyr.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 10 Concerning calling "women" "girl", anyone ever consider that for us "younger" types that most females we have associated with for most of our lives have actually BEEN girls? Perhaps it is just a bad habit. Oh, well, time to grow up and start seeing those "women". Could be interesting!! :-) Just a thought. Mark L. Bowen "...and as the light was revealed unto them it blinded them, and yea they were again in darkness."