Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!kwlalonde From: kwlalonde@watmath.UUCP Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Re on the direction of net.motss Message-ID: <9211@watmath.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 18:45:55 EDT Article-I.D.: watmath.9211 Posted: Fri Sep 28 18:45:55 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Sep-84 09:06:58 EDT Sender: kwlalonde@watmath.UUCP Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 39 Subject: Re on the direction of net.motss : net.motss My problem with the Arndts, Brunsons, et.als is have this incredible tendency to hit my "n" key if I see articles from them (not so bad) but also on article who's title refers to one of their submissions. I *suspect* that I miss valid information this way. Even though someone puts a title in reference to the et.als they have buried in their article some info/topic that can be quite new/different -- but I have used the "n" key, *sigh*. Example: Subject: Re last article by favourite christian Paragraph 1: I think that christian is just actiing christian again and maybe attacks on the points/person. Next paragraph: BY THE WAY..... So I ask, if we keep this forum public (if no mailing lists -- although I think I would personally prefer mail) (is it possible to have a "supplement" mailing list as well as net.motss or would that guarantee the death of net.motss????) Could people make the following points of effort: a) if article refers to arndt,brunson,dubois,et.al, please say so in the subject line b) if (a) type of article with said subject line, PLEASE DO NOT include new topics or information but make a separate posting - Ken Dykes Software Development Group, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. N2L 3G1 watmath!watrose!watbun!kgdykes