Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: new twist on computer "crime" and law
Message-ID: <98@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Sep-84 18:07:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.98
Posted: Mon Sep 24 18:07:59 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Sep-84 04:18:25 EDT
References: <3716@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 23

*	From: falcone@erlang.DEC (Joe Falcone, HLO2-3/N03, dtn 225-6059)

	. . . the AFL-CIO has passed resolutions indicating their
	position on other "work-at-home" situations.  In particular,
	they passed a resolution favoring the passage of a law
	regulating computer work at home. . . .  Of course, it is
	unclear what the extent of such a law would be, but it would
	definitely effect all those solitary hackers putting out nifty
	utilities for PC's as a profitable hobby.  In this case, hacker
	does = criminal; someone could be prosecuted for programming at
	home just like the knitters in New England.

(-:)

FLAME!!!  What!?  They're all conspiring to keep us stuck in rush hour!
Work at home?  They'll haul me off to jail!  (Please officer I was just
playing Rogue!  NOOOOOooooooaaaaaauuugh....)
-- 
(This mind accidently left blank.)

In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci (301) 454-7690
UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris@maryland