Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot From: chabot@amber.DEC (Chevrolet Chabot) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: On the Interpretation of "girl" Message-ID: <3777@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 16:24:12 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.3777 Posted: Fri Sep 28 16:24:12 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:19:42 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 13 Mark L. Bowen == > > Concerning calling "women" "girl", anyone ever consider that for us "younger" > types that most females we have associated with for most of our lives have > actually BEEN girls? By "us 'younger' types", you mean you "boys"? ----------------- Let's call a Trey of Swords a Trey of Swords: L S Chabot UUCP: ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot ARPA: ...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA USFail: DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA 01752