Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pittvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!mcnc!idis!pitt!pittvax!hoffman
From: hoffman@pittvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: Why is 250 Hz filter CHEAPER than 500 Hz? (ICOM R71A)
Message-ID: <606@pittvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 23:53:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: pittvax.606
Posted: Tue Oct  9 23:53:58 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 01:10:16 EDT
References: 
Reply-To: hoffman@pitt.UUCP (Bob Hoffman)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh
Lines: 11

I have an R71A with the 250 Hz filter and find that it performs very
well.  Between that filter, the passband tuning, and the notch, I
can isolate even the most crowded of CW signals.  Now, if only I
were more proficient in CW! :-) It even does an acceptable job of
picking those 85-hz shift RTTY stations out of the multiplexed
transmissions.

---N3CVL
-- 
Bob Hoffman
Pitt Computer Science