Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!houxe!drutx!druxi!bml
From: bml@druxi.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: On the Interpretation of "girl"
Message-ID: <772@druxi.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Sep-84 17:03:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: druxi.772
Posted: Thu Sep 20 17:03:17 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 20:18:45 EDT
References: <212@gitpyr.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 10

Concerning calling "women" "girl", anyone ever consider that for us "younger"
types that most females we have associated with for most of our lives have
actually BEEN girls? Perhaps it is just a bad habit. Oh, well, time to grow
up and start seeing those "women". Could be interesting!! :-)
  Just a thought.

  Mark L. Bowen

"...and as the light was revealed unto them it blinded them, and yea they were
again in darkness."