Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site tove.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!tove!rene
From: rene@tove.UUCP (Rene Steiner)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: RE: apology
Message-ID: <23@tove.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Oct-84 11:32:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: tove.23
Posted: Fri Oct 19 11:32:30 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Oct-84 07:44:43 EDT
References: <5057@root44.UUCP>
Organization: U of Maryland, Laboratory for Parallel Computation, C.P., MD
Lines: 28

> I agree that the whole idea of an employers disclaimer is a bit silly.
> But I can see that some lawyers could go round getting worried (or rather
> getting company management worried -they have got to justify their existence
> somehow).
> Maybe we could update netiquette so that a disclaimer is to always be
> assumed -unless explicitly stated.
> 	Alain Williams

(how interesting - this goes automagically to net.followup - what a
wonderful idea!)

I just now (in the past few days) switched to reading news on a
different machine because my employer saw an article I posted to
net.jokes.d (about a  problem with 0 length articles - I first
encountered the problem in net.jokes). He was worried about "what will
people think if they see NIH employees reading net.jokes?" Of course,
anyone reading my article ALSO reads net.jokes. I also wonder how HE
saw my article. So, in case you're wondering, nothing I say or imply
has ANYTHING AT ALL to with the opinions, management, or anything else
to do with the US goverment, or reflects anythings at all upon any of
the fuddy-duddies employed therein. This is all my opinion, of
course.

			- rene
-- 
rene@tove

My opinions are my own, and no one can take them away from me!!!