Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!cca!ima!ism70!dianeh From: dianeh@ism70.UUCP Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Re: Professional Films Re: 5247 Message-ID: <33@ism70.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 01:34:06 EDT Article-I.D.: ism70.33 Posted: Tue Oct 2 01:34:06 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 28-Sep-84 06:59:34 EDT Lines: 32 Nf-ID: #R:aluxe:-36300:ism70:16800002:000:1140 Nf-From: ism70!dianeh Sep 24 16:45:00 1984Thanks to 2141smh (at aluxe) for writing the response I was afraid I was going to have to take the time to write -- and for doing it so clearly. BUT... ***** ism70:net.rec.photo / brl-tgr!ron / 5:30 pm Sep 19, 1984 Then I still stand my ground 5247 and it's relatives are not professional film when used in the 35mm context. Some of the more esoteric stuff for micrography, etc.. are. -Ron ---------- HUH?!? You mean, because it has to be refrigerated, a *truly professional* photographer like yourself wouldn't be able to take it out of the refrigerator and load it into your 35mm still camera and take pictures with it? Trust me, it's done ALL the time...by professionals and amateurs alike. As was stated before, off-the-shelf films are amateur films -- in-the-fridge films are professional films. They take more care to store and more care to use -- THAT'S what makes them professional films...amateurs can't be bothered with all that fuss, they just want to load, shoot, and go. Really, it's not that big of a deal, but just *try* to think about it a little more clearly...please... diane