Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!gwyn@BRL-VLD.ARPA From: gwyn@BRL-VLD.ARPA Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: sh vs csh Message-ID: <12124@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 05:16:42 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12124 Posted: Tue Sep 18 05:16:42 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 07:37:08 EDT Lines: 8 From: Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)Personally I think the Bourne shell functions are better than Cshell aliases. I am having a fine time with my UNIX System V Release 2 shell. Even better, Ron Natalie added job control to it. Now, if we could figure out a good way to edit command history (Cshell ! stuff is not the right way), we could junk csh altogether. Anybody have a good history mechanism for the Bourne shell? (It's hard..)