Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver (info-mac)
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: 512K Mac and RAM disk driver
Message-ID: <1829@uw-beaver>
Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 21:38:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.1829
Posted: Tue Oct  2 21:38:59 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 04:04:32 EDT
Sender: daemon@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 12

From: Tim McNerney 
Your results are indeed astounding.  I would have expected this sort of
speed-up WITHOUT having to resort to hacks like using a RAM "disk."  It
sounds like the operating system's memory manager is not making effective
use of all the physical memory that the Fat Mac has.

Does anyone know what Apple plans to do about this?

Has anyone compared the performance of 512K Mac and the "small" Mac?

	Tim