Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site water.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!water!rggoebel From: rggoebel@water.UUCP (Randy Goebel) Newsgroups: net.ai Subject: Re: Clarification Regarding Teknowledge's M.1 Product Message-ID: <20@water.UUCP> Date: Sun, 30-Sep-84 11:30:02 EDT Article-I.D.: water.20 Posted: Sun Sep 30 11:30:02 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 1-Oct-84 03:33:58 EDT References: <12417@sri-arpa.UUCP> Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 17 I've just read what amounts to an advertisement for Teknowledge's M.1 software product. I can't believe there isn't something to be criticized in a product that comes from such an infant technology? I'd be interested to know what's wrong with M.1? Will Teknowledge give it away to universities to teach students about expert systems? Is SRI-KL using M.1 for anything (note origin of original message)? On a lighter note, what is novel about a software system that supports ``variables?'' Randy Goebel Logic Programming and Artificial Intelligence Group Computer Science Department University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA N2L 3G1 UUCP: {decvax,ihnp4,allegra}!watmath!water!rggoebel CSNET: rggoebel%water@waterloo.csnet ARPA: rggoebel%water%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa