Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm From: mwm@ea.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Re: The Sub-Minimum Wage Again Message-ID: <22400008@ea.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 09:19:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ea.22400008 Posted: Wed Sep 19 09:19:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 21:17:32 EDT References: <485@tty3b.UUCP> Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R:tty3b:-48500:ea:22400008:000:548 Nf-From: ea!mwm Sep 19 08:19:00 1984 /***** ea:net.politics / tty3b!mjk / 6:31 pm Sep 6, 1984 */ The "right-to-work" argument is a management red herring. Mike Kelly /* ---------- */ I love it. For people outside the union, the right to work is a management red herring, and all they get is the right to starve. For people inside the union, the right to work is "job security," and a major bargaining point. Syjigm at its finest. Come on, Mike - tell us one more time how union monopolies are good for society. If you repeat it often enough, you may hypnotize us, too.