Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!emjej
From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: net.os9? - (nf)
Message-ID: <9300022@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 00:24:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.9300022
Posted: Tue Oct  2 00:24:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:36:20 EDT
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #N:uokvax:9300022:000:624
Nf-From: uokvax!emjej    Sep 18 23:24:00 1984

#N:uokvax:9300022:000:624
uokvax!emjej    Sep 18 23:24:00 1984

I may be sorry I did this, but here goes:

in view of the existence of the OS-9 operating system for two different
processors (the 6809 and the 68000), as well as the interest expressed
both in net.micro and in mail to me in said operating system, it seems
to me not entirely proper that net.micro.6809 be a de facto net.os9;
therefore, I wish to propose a net.os9 (as well as possible alternative
names/positioning in the name tree). If consensus is that there's not
sufficient traffic to merit, so be it; I merely present the idea for
consideration.

				James Jones

				{uokvax,mtxinu}!ea!jejones
				ctvax!uokvax!emjej