Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site hammer.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!hammer!ews From: ews@hammer.UUCP (Ed Sznyter) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: What is sensitivity good for anyway? Message-ID: <928@hammer.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 17:31:40 EDT Article-I.D.: hammer.928 Posted: Fri Sep 21 17:31:40 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 01:37:10 EDT References: randvax.1970, <2647@mit-eddie.UUCP>, <1318@browngr.UUCP> <1989@randvax.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 21 } ] I think the major effect of being sensitive is that women } ] will end up feeling a little guilty when they kick your } ] teeth in, rather than just complacently doing it. :-| } } If that really *is* your attitude, then I don't blame them one bit } for ``kicking your teeth in''. } } -Ed Hall } decvaxe!randvax!edhall Let X be the name of the original poster, which I have forgotten. Assume, for the moment, that X's teeth really have been kicked in, and that this action would not normally be acceptable behavior (although I accept that it's the norm). Then how does X's theories on the motivation behind this action change the blame? Ed Sznyter tektronix!tekecs!ews tekecs!ews%tektronix@csnet-relay.csnet