Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!decwrl!amd!dual!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!brahms
From: brahms@spp2.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.kids
Subject: Re: Diapers
Message-ID: <185@spp2.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Oct-84 12:12:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: spp2.185
Posted: Tue Oct 16 12:12:46 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Oct-84 06:43:25 EDT
References: <73@azure.UUCP> <11@tove.UUCP> <233@olivej.UUCP>
Reply-To: brahms@spp2.UUCP (Bradley S. Brahms)
Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach  CA
Lines: 25

>We've found we don't like Luvs for two reasons:
>	(1) We've noticed a higher incidence of diaper rash 
>	    with them.

For us, we have had better luck with Huggies and Luvs than Pampers.  The
two times we have used Pampers on our son, he has developed a rash.

>	(2) Even when they're straight out of the box they
>	    have what we find an unpleasant smell.  (Hard
>	    to tell "at a whiff" if the little one needs
>	    changing).

We can usually tell by the look of the diaper if it is wet or not.  If it
is wet, the outside of the diaper is not as smooth as it was orig.

Then again, we only use disposables when we are going some where.  At
home, he uses normal cloth diapers.  A diaper service runs about the same
as disposables.  Also, remember, it is illegal to dump the diaper in the
trash.  The disposable part is supposed to go down the toilet.  In fact,
there is a growing problem because people do not put the diaper down the
toilet.

			-- Brad brahms
			   usenet: {decvax,ucbvax}!trwrb!trwspp!brahms
			   arpa:   Brahms@usc-eclc