Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84  Brag 10-8-84; site bragvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!qubix!ios!oliveb!hplabs!bragvax!david
From: david@bragvax.UUCP (David DiGiacomo)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: mod.all and net.fascism
Message-ID: <221@bragvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Oct-84 16:40:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: bragvax.221
Posted: Wed Oct 17 16:40:11 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Oct-84 06:20:37 EDT
References: <3886@decwrl.UUCP> <1574@nsc.UUCP> <200@bragvax.UUCP> <371@amdahl.UUCP> <429@amd.UUCP>
Organization: Brag Systems Inc., San Mateo, CA
Lines: 18

I was apparently quoted as follows in 371@amdahl: 

(>> my quote,  > someone else's comment)

>> Can someone convince me that the "new order" mod groups are not an example
>> of net.fascism?
> No, I can't.  My gripe is the new 'mod.motss', being created because
> some contributors ...

I'd like to make it clear that I have no objection to moderated groups,
or to mod.motss.  However, I'm very unhappy that mod.movies, mod.music,
mod.newslists, mod.singles, mod.sources, and mod.unix were created
anonymously with no advance discussion or justification.  Who are the
moderators for these groups, who selected them, and what are their
qualifications? 
-- 
David DiGiacomo, BRAG Systems Inc., San Mateo CA  (415) 342-3963
(...decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!bragvax!david)