Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site calmasd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!calmasd!gail From: gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan) Newsgroups: net.abortion,net.women Subject: Re: I am pro-choice, dare you claim the same? Message-ID: <180@calmasd.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 20:14:27 EDT Article-I.D.: calmasd.180 Posted: Fri Sep 21 20:14:27 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:34:03 EDT References: <8988@watmath.UUCP> Organization: Calma Company, San Diego, CA Lines: 21 >Likewise on funding. How can you claim to be pro-choice, and at the >same time insist that those anti-abortionists be forced on pain of prison >to pay for abortions! Where's the advocacy of choice in that? > Brad Templeton Some of those same anti-abortionists are "forcing" me to pay for MX missiles and weaponry that *I* don't want. :) This whole "I don't want my tax money to go for xyz" thing is fallacious. It's just as easy to think of your tax money as paying for something you do support. (But not as interesting rhetorically.) Gail Bayley Hanrahan {decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail Calma Company, San Diego