Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!alan
From: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Context of the Debate
Message-ID: <1316@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Sep-84 16:12:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1316
Posted: Mon Sep 17 16:12:33 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:38:33 EDT
References: <1052@ihuxm.UUCP> <1866@ucbvax.ARPA> 
Reply-To: alan@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Alan Algustyniak)
Organization: System Development Corporation, Santa Monica
Lines: 17
Summary: 

>>the Shah of
>>Iran, who, despite the claims of Khomeni, was a very good ruler,
>>	Wayne
>
>I would recommend
>that you read some of their reports on political repression in Iran
>during the Shah's rule.  You might find there evidence of a few more
>things he did wrong.
>Sophie Quigley

I'm afraid Sophie's right Wayne; I'm sure that, according to her defn.
no one has ever been a good ruler.  But Sophie, consider this: don't
you think that he was probably the best ruler Iran ever had, and is the
best that could be hoped for today?

	sdcrdcf!alan