Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site uwmacc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!consult From: consult@uwmacc.UUCP (MACC Consultants) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Why isn't Vanessa Williams Suing? Message-ID: <304@uwmacc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 16-Sep-84 17:07:25 EDT Article-I.D.: uwmacc.304 Posted: Sun Sep 16 17:07:25 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 05:43:13 EDT Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center Lines: 14 Why do I keep reading here that Vanessa Williams isn't suing? (And the next sentence usually implies that this shows that she was wrong to begin with.) According to at least two articles I've seend in the newspaper she IS suing - both Penthouse and the photographer - for $10,000 plus the profits. I don't know where she came up with $10,000. It seems like she should have started with a million or so. Sue Brunkow ...seismo!uwvax!maccvax!consult