Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncoast.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!akgua!mcnc!decvax!cwruecmp!atvax!ncoast!bobw
From: bobw@ncoast.UUCP (w2551080h2867511)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: XENIX cu bugs
Message-ID: <318@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 22:39:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: ncoast.318
Posted: Wed Sep 12 22:39:04 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:50:47 EDT
References: <13134@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Organization: North Coast XENIX, Cleveland
Lines: 14

()
We at ncoast, and I personally at my company with a similar Model 16
have used cu successfully between these systems without errors with
files as large as 100K.  We have used uucp between the same systems
for almost a megabyte of binary transfer at a time, all at 1200 baud.

Most of the time, the system was lightly loaded ( uucp about 4am) but
I have done cu transfer with 3 users on, 2 running heavy disk I/O and
runcobol.

Reply by mail if we can be of assistance.  By the way, we have been using
1.3.2, but used 1.2.0 back then as I recall for some of these transfers.