Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!cca!ima!ism70!dianeh
From: dianeh@ism70.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Re: Professional Films Re: 5247
Message-ID: <33@ism70.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 01:34:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: ism70.33
Posted: Tue Oct  2 01:34:06 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 28-Sep-84 06:59:34 EDT
Lines: 32
Nf-ID: #R:aluxe:-36300:ism70:16800002:000:1140
Nf-From: ism70!dianeh    Sep 24 16:45:00 1984




Thanks to 2141smh (at aluxe) for writing the response I was afraid I was going
to have to take the time to write -- and for doing it so clearly.

BUT...

   ***** ism70:net.rec.photo / brl-tgr!ron /  5:30 pm  Sep 19, 1984
   Then I still stand my ground 5247 and it's relatives are not professional
   film when used in the 35mm context.  Some of the more esoteric stuff
   for micrography, etc.. are.

	-Ron
   ----------

HUH?!?

You mean, because it has to be refrigerated, a *truly professional*
photographer like yourself wouldn't be able to take it out of the refrigerator
and load it into your 35mm still camera and take pictures with it? Trust me,
it's done ALL the time...by professionals and amateurs alike. As was stated
before, off-the-shelf films are amateur films -- in-the-fridge films are
professional films. They take more care to store and more care to use --
THAT'S what makes them professional films...amateurs can't be bothered with
all that fuss, they just want to load, shoot, and go.

Really, it's not that big of a deal, but just *try* to think about it a little
more clearly...please...

diane