Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:agz
From: agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.abortion
Subject: Re: ERA and abortion
Message-ID: <426@pucc-k>
Date: Thu, 11-Oct-84 05:52:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: pucc-k.426
Posted: Thu Oct 11 05:52:38 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 03:36:29 EDT
References: <372@uwmacc.UUCP> <499@tty3b.UUCP>
Organization: Dept. of  Mental Instability, Purdue University
Lines: 21


> Abortion is legal in the U.S. under some circumstances.   So long as that
> is true, why should there be discrimination against poor people?  That's
> what a cutoff of funding for abortion does.  It says if you can afford to
> pay for it, OK; otherwise, no way.  That's hypocritical and wrong.

Big news, buddy. That's the way capitalism is supposed to work. Abortion
is a strange issue to begin with. It's not a matter of you're poor, so
you can't afford a TV set or something like that. But still, *I* should
have to pay for someone else getting an abortion? If that's how it is
supposed to be, I think there is something wrong. But I also think that
if I should have to pay for someone find/keep a job to do anything, I
think it's wrong. Go ahead and toast (flame) me ...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Banta			{decvax!allegra!ihnp4}!pur-ee!pucc-k!agz
Dept. of Mental Instability, Purdue University --- "I'm OK, You're a CS Major"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing's good, the news is bad.
 The heat goes on, and it drives you mad ... "