Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 Fluke 8/7/84; site fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!microsoft!fluke!moriarty From: moriarty@fluke.UUCP (Jeff Meyer) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: What is sensitivity good for anyway? Message-ID: <1389@vax2.fluke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24-Sep-84 13:50:55 EDT Article-I.D.: vax2.1389 Posted: Mon Sep 24 13:50:55 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 03:28:37 EDT References: randvax.1970, <2647@mit-eddie.UUCP>, <1318@browngr.UUCP> <1989@randvax.UUCP> <928@hammer.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, WA Lines: 31 >} ] I think the major effect of being sensitive is that women >} ] will end up feeling a little guilty when they kick your >} ] teeth in, rather than just complacently doing it. :-| >} >} If that really *is* your attitude, then I don't blame them one bit >} for ``kicking your teeth in''. >} >} -Ed Hall >} decvaxe!randvax!edhall > >Let X be the name of the original poster, which I have forgotten. > >Assume, for the moment, that X's teeth really have been kicked in, >and that this action would not normally be acceptable behavior (although >I accept that it's the norm). Then how does X's theories on the >motivation behind this action change the blame? > > Ed Sznyter > tektronix!tekecs!ews It doesn't unless.... X IS A DENTIST! Ta-dump Ta-dump (Take my car, please...) Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc. UUCP: {cornell,decvax,ihnp4,sdcsvax,tektronix,utcsrgv}!uw-beaver \ {allegra,gatech!sb1,hplabs!lbl-csam,decwrl!sun,ssc-vax} -- !fluke!moriarty ARPA: fluke!moriarty@uw-beaver.ARPA