Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site angband.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!mordor!angband!sjc From: sjc@angband.UUCP (Steve Correll) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Cartridge advice Message-ID: <21@angband.UUCP> Date: Sun, 30-Sep-84 22:01:42 EDT Article-I.D.: angband.21 Posted: Sun Sep 30 22:01:42 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Oct-84 07:35:33 EDT Distribution: net Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL Lines: 26 Re the query, "Is a $250 cartridge 10 times as good as a $25 cartridge?", I'll offer one experience. Some years ago, after I traded studenthood for a real grownup job, I traded my Shure M91ED for a Shure V15 Type III. The difference was pretty striking. I heard all kinds of new details on old records, loud passages were less harsh, I deciphered certain song lyrics that had always puzzled me, and (unfortunately) I realized that the old cartridge had scarred some of my records in passages where it didn't track properly. Later, when I traded the V15 Type III for a V15 Type IV, the sound improved further, but more striking was the new cartridge's ability to play some warped records which I had given up for lost. I paid not $250, but roughly $125 for each of the V15 cartridges, which were widely discounted. I gather that the gap in quality between cheap and expensive cartridges has diminished, but I'd be inclined to invest the extra $100. Even more important, though, I'd advocate choosing a cartridge/tonearm combination that minimizes the effect of record warps (e.g., high compliance cartridges require low-mass arms). You can pore over compliance and arm-mass specifications (High Fidelity Magazine periodically prints a little nomograph for this purpose). Or you can just buy one of the Shure cartridges with the resonance-damping brush which, despite its gimmicky appearance, has worked well for me.--Steve -- --Steve Correll sjc@s1-c.ARPA, ...!decvax!decwrl!mordor!sjc, or ...!ucbvax!dual!mordor!sjc