Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp2.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!decwrl!amd!dual!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!brahms From: brahms@spp2.UUCP Newsgroups: net.kids Subject: Re: Diapers Message-ID: <185@spp2.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Oct-84 12:12:46 EDT Article-I.D.: spp2.185 Posted: Tue Oct 16 12:12:46 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Oct-84 06:43:25 EDT References: <73@azure.UUCP> <11@tove.UUCP> <233@olivej.UUCP> Reply-To: brahms@spp2.UUCP (Bradley S. Brahms) Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach CA Lines: 25 >We've found we don't like Luvs for two reasons: > (1) We've noticed a higher incidence of diaper rash > with them. For us, we have had better luck with Huggies and Luvs than Pampers. The two times we have used Pampers on our son, he has developed a rash. > (2) Even when they're straight out of the box they > have what we find an unpleasant smell. (Hard > to tell "at a whiff" if the little one needs > changing). We can usually tell by the look of the diaper if it is wet or not. If it is wet, the outside of the diaper is not as smooth as it was orig. Then again, we only use disposables when we are going some where. At home, he uses normal cloth diapers. A diaper service runs about the same as disposables. Also, remember, it is illegal to dump the diaper in the trash. The disposable part is supposed to go down the toilet. In fact, there is a growing problem because people do not put the diaper down the toilet. -- Brad brahms usenet: {decvax,ucbvax}!trwrb!trwspp!brahms arpa: Brahms@usc-eclc