Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site trwspp.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!stassen From: stassen@trwspp.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: hav's major catharsis (take 3) Message-ID: <609@trwspp.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Oct-84 14:30:15 EDT Article-I.D.: trwspp.609 Posted: Thu Oct 4 14:30:15 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Oct-84 06:47:42 EDT Organization: T R W, Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 58 [] > HEY!!! Whaddya mean, find something better to do? If someone is going to > flame the net for lousy (make that crummy; lousy is getting to be over-used) > grammar and/or punctuation, doesn't it seem reasonable that his or her (yes, > I read my mail) flame should be grammatically correct, and that *everything* > contained therein should be impeccably spelled? No? Well, you can always > unsubscribe, or "n" over the article, or go jump in the lake. :-) Aha... now I know why you were being such a "bored argumentative prick." Did you read the title of my article? It was "Re: minor catharsis." The "Re:" means that it is in reference to another article (Latin "re" - "about"). The other article is: Message-ID: <319@ihu1e.UUCP> I bet you didn't read the original article. This is a real "no-no." If you had, you would have understood that I was not flaming the net in general over spelling and punctuation. I was flaming at this one person who had decided that the English language was a standard that we could do without. Furthermore, you would have noticed that the most important parts of the article (the body, and the signature) were correct ("spelled impeccably"). You would have also noticed that the quote at the end of the article was enclosed in QUOTATION MARKS ("). This means that it is not original material. Being observant, you would also notice a lot of "standards" on the net have nothing to do with proper English. In fact, you make use of the three most common ones: ":-)" and "EMPHASIS" and "*emphasis*" You, my "friend," are "way out in left field." I suggest you reread the original article ("minor catharsis"), and then reread my article. If you still can't help but take my article personally, then I suggest you try one of the following methods: (1) Go jump in a lake. (2) Seek professional help. (3) Hide under your bed and read the label on the box spring until you feel better. Do you use readnews? The command "readnews -x -n net.flame -t atharsis" should let you see the original article. And, if I may be so bold as to ask, what English text allows "Whaddya?" Incidentally, it seems to be a de facto rule that it is open season on anyone who picks on someone else's spelling errors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this document are my own. They are not intended to reflect the views of my employer - TRW - or anyone else. Flame away! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Christian W. Stassen [decvax!trwrb,vortex,ihnp4!vortex]!trwspp!stassen "You rearrange me 'till I'm sane."