Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amd!phil
From: phil@amd.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Snoopy's conception of abortion
Message-ID: <413@amd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Oct-84 20:43:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: amd.413
Posted: Fri Oct 12 20:43:51 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 08:22:53 EDT
References: <1985@stolaf.UUCP>
Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 18

> 	Your several corrolary examples are as equally ridiculous.  You
> cite only items of luxury, not necessity.  Abortions are a matter of
> need.  Just how important you view that need, or how right it is, or how
> you apply it to various situations, I'll let you decide - but you can't
> tell me that having an abortion is a luxury!  Get serious!!

I don't see the government funding heart transplants which are rather
important to the person who needs one. And I don't want them to either.

Let's consider "poor people who live in the Northeast who can't pay their
heating bills" or any of the other classes of people who have a need
they can't afford. Now explain why people who need abortions are more
deserving of my tax dollars.
-- 

 Phil Ngai (408) 982-6554
 UUCPnet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd!phil
 ARPAnet: amd!phil@decwrl.ARPA