Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amd!phil From: phil@amd.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Snoopy's conception of abortion Message-ID: <413@amd.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12-Oct-84 20:43:51 EDT Article-I.D.: amd.413 Posted: Fri Oct 12 20:43:51 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 08:22:53 EDT References: <1985@stolaf.UUCP> Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA Lines: 18 > Your several corrolary examples are as equally ridiculous. You > cite only items of luxury, not necessity. Abortions are a matter of > need. Just how important you view that need, or how right it is, or how > you apply it to various situations, I'll let you decide - but you can't > tell me that having an abortion is a luxury! Get serious!! I don't see the government funding heart transplants which are rather important to the person who needs one. And I don't want them to either. Let's consider "poor people who live in the Northeast who can't pay their heating bills" or any of the other classes of people who have a need they can't afford. Now explain why people who need abortions are more deserving of my tax dollars. -- Phil Ngai (408) 982-6554 UUCPnet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd!phil ARPAnet: amd!phil@decwrl.ARPA