Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd,net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: sh -c 'trap "" 10; date' vs. sh -c 'trap "" 11; date' on 4.?bsd Message-ID: <4623@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 16:06:52 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.4623 Posted: Fri Sep 14 16:06:52 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 02:38:07 EDT References: <1207@elsie.UUCP> Organization: Ballistics Research Lab Lines: 4 Yes, you cannot catch trap 11 in the Bourne shell since it is needed internally for memory allocation purposes. Newer shells give the following message on your example: sh: bad trap: cannot trap 11