Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncoast.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!akgua!mcnc!decvax!cwruecmp!atvax!ncoast!bobw From: bobw@ncoast.UUCP (w2551080h2867511) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Re: XENIX cu bugs Message-ID: <318@ncoast.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 22:39:04 EDT Article-I.D.: ncoast.318 Posted: Wed Sep 12 22:39:04 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:50:47 EDT References: <13134@sri-arpa.UUCP> Organization: North Coast XENIX, Cleveland Lines: 14 () We at ncoast, and I personally at my company with a similar Model 16 have used cu successfully between these systems without errors with files as large as 100K. We have used uucp between the same systems for almost a megabyte of binary transfer at a time, all at 1200 baud. Most of the time, the system was lightly loaded ( uucp about 4am) but I have done cu transfer with 3 users on, 2 running heavy disk I/O and runcobol. Reply by mail if we can be of assistance. By the way, we have been using 1.3.2, but used 1.2.0 back then as I recall for some of these transfers.