Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!oliven!hawk From: hawk@oliven.UUCP (Rick) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: big brother Message-ID: <574@oliven.UUCP> Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 19:28:36 EDT Article-I.D.: oliven.574 Posted: Tue Sep 18 19:28:36 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 04:44:54 EDT References: <216@laidbak.UUCP> Organization: University of Waikiki Lines: 15 Gee, Kin. Seems like some things are reasonable to forbid because we find them offensive but others aren't. hmm. Now, before we hear a crusade against the government legislating morality, would someone name a single law that isn't either a: based on morality of some form (drinking ages, rape, . . . ) That is, find a law that isn't an imposition of beliefs. b: an arbitrary standard (drive on right hand side of the road, etc.) That is, imposing the belief that there should be a standard rick -- [hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk