Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!ucbvax!medin From: medin@ucbvax.ARPA (Milo Medin) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re: Disarm. & Foreign Policy - (nf) Message-ID: <2521@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Sat, 13-Oct-84 18:53:08 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.2521 Posted: Sat Oct 13 18:53:08 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 15-Oct-84 01:33:34 EDT References: <318@ihu1e.UUCP> <22400012@ea.UUCP> <1390@vax2.fluke.UUCP> <274@whuxl.UUCP> Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 11 50K weapons are more than enough? More than enough for what? Those 50K are very diverse systems indeed, you cant make a blanket statement like that? You make no mention of accuracy or throweight or many otheer important details. As for freezing us into inadaquacy and old unreliable systems such as the B-52, I say no thank you. Try not to be so simplistic, it tends to make you look unintelligent. Milo