Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!stanonik@nprdc.ARPA From: stanonik@nprdc.ARPA Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: Re: rfnm's and 4.2bsd Message-ID: <12267@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Sep-84 17:09:00 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12267 Posted: Fri Sep 21 17:09:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:53:03 EDT Lines: 13 According to the bbn 1822 report, after the imp sends a RESET, it should respond to the first message with a BADLEADER. So berkeley's expectation of a BADLEADER seems in accordance with the report. Why they chose to wait for the BADLEADER before clearing rfnm's beats me. Why we don't see a BADLEADER beats me too, and makes it necessary for us to reboot to clear the rfnm counts. The report doesn't seem to mention when the imp clears its rfnm counts. I guess we'll assume on RESET. Thanks, Ron stanonik@nprdc