Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!oliven!rap From: rap@oliven.UUCP (Robert A. Pease) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.motss Subject: Re: Logical Arguments Message-ID: <641@oliven.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 16:04:16 EDT Article-I.D.: oliven.641 Posted: Fri Oct 5 16:04:16 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 7-Oct-84 21:15:38 EDT References: <186@usfbobo.UUCP> Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca Lines: 16 . >I make no pretence of using "logical" or "reasonable" arguments. >I don't know what a "reductionist" argument is and don't care. >If you ever see a "logical argument" in my writing it is an accident. > ... > >-- >David Brunson, Master of Netsmanship Then by your own admission, you haven't got a leg to stand on. Why do you bother? -- Robert A. Pease {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!rap