Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!nsc!chongo
From: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon C. Noll)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: New and improved name for the 32032 (16032?)
Message-ID: <1547@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Oct-84 05:16:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.1547
Posted: Mon Oct  8 05:16:14 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Oct-84 02:57:11 EDT
References: <1372@bmcg.UUCP> <1487@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 22

>	 > Old	New	New and improved
>	 > 16008	32008	?
>	 > 16016	32016	?
>	 > 16032	32032	32123
>	 > -	-	32232
>	 > -	-	32332
>	 > -	-	32432
> 
> 16008? 16016?   i think you were given some wrong information there.  here is
> a better list:
> 
> 	old	new
> 	08032	32008
> 	16032	32016
> 	32032	32032	

I never said that the chips didnt exist!  I suggested that some wrong
information was obtained because the 16016 is quite a bit different from
the 32016; and the 16032 was connected with the 32016, not the 32032 as
was suggested!  Yes, the 16008 and 16016 chips were considered ...

chongo <"There you go again...  :-)"> /\../\