Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Vinyl vs. CD recordings Message-ID: <829@opus.UUCP> Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 20:06:07 EDT Article-I.D.: opus.829 Posted: Tue Sep 18 20:06:07 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 03:09:14 EDT References: <3050@watcgl.UUCP> <61@unc.UUCP> Organization: NBI, Boulder Lines: 11 > But when measured by the important (admittedly subjective) measurement -- is > it listenable -- vinyl is better, on the average, than CD. > > This is because no CD's are listenable, whereas some vinyl is. And that's > all that matters. Could we move this side of the discussion over to net.religion (from which I just recently unsubscribed:-) and get on with something substantive? -- Dick Dunn {hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd (303)444-5710 x3086 ...Never offend with style when you can offend with substance.