Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site shark.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!tektronix!orca!shark!brianp
From: brianp@shark.UUCP (Brian Peterson)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Vinyl vs. CD recordings
Message-ID: <1072@shark.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Sep-84 11:36:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: shark.1072
Posted: Tue Sep 25 11:36:19 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:27:09 EDT
References: <3050@watcgl.UUCP> <61@unc.UUCP>, <829@opus.UUCP>, <4758@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 12

LPCD	If it was done in pure analog, though, all the anti-digital arguments
LPCD	are overcome, while all the reasons for digital are also achieved
LPCD	(except for the minor one of the size of the storage medium; LPs
LPCD	are still bigger than CDs).

You are forgetting the bestest in the galaxy reason for digital music systems.
(Hint: look under your fingers)
For plain old >retrieval<, however, your idea (laser reading of vinyl) is
a great idea.

Brian Peterson  {ucbvax, ihnp4, }  !tektronix!shark!brianp
				    ^         ^