Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ritcv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!spw2562
From: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re*2: final argument against
Message-ID: <1256@ritcv.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 12:41:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: ritcv.1256
Posted: Fri Sep 14 12:41:24 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:23:52 EDT
References: <929@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Lines: 20

[ I don't believe in line-eat... AAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIII!!!   *gulp*  ]

> Women who become pregnant unintentionally are similar to the
> the victims of muggers and arsonists, not to the criminals; all three
> groups of victims have had their property rights violated.

Does this mean if I invite someone I'v never seen before into
my house, and they rob me while I'm gone, it's not my fault?

> Women do not have any choice about the nature of their biology.
> Its side effects (one of which is that they can become pregnant
> by accident) should not...

She got pregnant by accident?  Gee, whatever could have caused that?


			Steve Wall
			...!ritcv!ritvp!spw2562

flames to /dev/null, please.