Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!ron From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Turntable questions (Lack of response) Message-ID: <4724@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 14:31:45 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.4724 Posted: Wed Sep 19 14:31:45 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 20:54:04 EDT References: <76200015@hpfclk.UUCP> <607@hound.UUCP> <805@opus.UUCP> Organization: Ballistics Research Lab Lines: 12 Well, this whole thing boils down to is 1. CD's are a more convenient format. 2. CD's are more tolerant of their environment (which is to say that technical slop is less likely to affect them). and 3. Records are more abundant. 4. Records with reasonable quality control and care can sound as good as their master. This is why I own both a CD player, a Cassette deck (for recording stuff to play in the car mostly), and a turntable. -Ron