Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k Subject: Re: Series 32000 part numbering history Message-ID: <4504@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Fri, 19-Oct-84 13:04:35 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.4504 Posted: Fri Oct 19 13:04:35 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 19-Oct-84 13:04:35 EDT References: <1610@nsc.UUCP>, <24200001@cmcl2.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 10 > Isn't there a clash of naming conventions between the NS32000 series > and the WE 32000 chip? In a word, yes. But this is nothing new. "4024" is not an unambiguous part number either; Motorola had a series of old bipolar parts with 4000-series part numbers, and most of them clash with CMOS numbers now. It's surprising that this problem isn't more frequent. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry