Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!decwrl!decvax!mcnc!duke!crm
From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Godel sentences contradictory?
Message-ID: <4784@duke.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Sep-84 10:25:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: duke.4784
Posted: Mon Sep 17 10:25:43 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 04:35:35 EDT
References: <2390@dartvax.UUCP>
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 12

I guess the argument that Goedel senatnces are contradictory
is a little weak -- I equivocated the word "contradictory"
with the concept of "self-denying".  My point is that a
Goedel sentance is a statement of fact which cannot be
evaluated, much as a Lier
s-paradox sentace can't. (Is that
how you spell the word for a person who lies?)

I don't feel real contrite about it, however....

Charlie Martin
(duke!crm)