Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site allegra.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!whuxle!spuxll!abnjh!u1100a!pyuxn!pyuxww!gamma!ulysses!allegra!alan
From: alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Forward Women not all they're cracked up to be?
Message-ID: <2813@allegra.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 10:35:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: allegra.2813
Posted: Fri Sep 28 10:35:21 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Sep-84 10:29:51 EDT
References: <3178@rabbit.UUCP>, <4375@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 26

> While I'm in the process of getting over a breakup with a `Forward
> Woman,' I thought I'd post this note for those of you who are as naive
> as I was.
>
> Some `Forward Women' seem that way only because they're out to see how
> many concurrent notches they can make on their lipstick cases (thanks,
> Pat Bennatar(sp?)).  I didn't realize this in general, and wasn't aware
> of it in this specific case for several reasons (too boring to go into
> here, but they also raise questions of honesty and trust).
>
> Would some of you out in netland like to respond to this accusation?

Who is your "accusation" directed at?  All "forward women"?  Or just
the ones out to put another notch on their lipstick cases?  Or maybe
all contributors to net.singles for not warning you?

Well, I, personally, don't want to be blamed for not warning people
about this sort of thing.  So let me say, for the record:  Generally
speaking, some of any group you care to mention is a particular way.
So be careful out there!  (Or something like that...)

-- 

	Alan S. Driscoll
	AT&T Bell Laboratories