Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!mmt From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Newsgroups: net.nlang Subject: A possibly unique word Message-ID: <1136@dciem.UUCP> Date: Sat, 13-Oct-84 15:16:31 EDT Article-I.D.: dciem.1136 Posted: Sat Oct 13 15:16:31 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 18:39:13 EDT Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada Lines: 17 The Oxford English Dictionary (in the 2-volume micro-print form of 8000+ pages) {contains/does not contain} the word "parecbasis" (and the adjectival form "parecbatical"). The paradox, if such it can be called, is that in the section "Spurious words" there are three words (parechasis and two others) that are considered to be errors made when the writer means "parecbasis". "Parecbasis" is (in that place) defined as a deviation in rhetoric from the main point -- Aha, Usenet slogan "Parecbatical and to the point". Now we look in the main body of the dictionary, and we find that "parecbasis" is not a word! Are there any other words that the OED declares specifically to be proper English and then declines to admit? -- Martin Taylor {allegra,linus,ihnp4,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt {uw-beaver,qucis,watmath}!utcsrgv!dciem!mmt