Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pittvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!mcnc!idis!pitt!pittvax!hoffman From: hoffman@pittvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: Re: Why is 250 Hz filter CHEAPER than 500 Hz? (ICOM R71A) Message-ID: <606@pittvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 23:53:58 EDT Article-I.D.: pittvax.606 Posted: Tue Oct 9 23:53:58 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 01:10:16 EDT References:Reply-To: hoffman@pitt.UUCP (Bob Hoffman) Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh Lines: 11 I have an R71A with the 250 Hz filter and find that it performs very well. Between that filter, the passband tuning, and the notch, I can isolate even the most crowded of CW signals. Now, if only I were more proficient in CW! :-) It even does an acceptable job of picking those 85-hz shift RTTY stations out of the multiplexed transmissions. ---N3CVL -- Bob Hoffman Pitt Computer Science