Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ritcv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!spw2562
From: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: re: final argument
Message-ID: <1291@ritcv.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Oct-84 14:40:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: ritcv.1291
Posted: Thu Oct  4 14:40:58 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Oct-84 02:02:51 EDT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Lines: 16

>            The very existence of fairly reliable birth control indicates
>that an unwanted pregnancy is not necessarily a risk associated with sex.
>Pregnancy is neither a necessary risk nor a necessary consequence of sex.
>There is, therefore, no such "risk" or "consequences" as you refer to.

You're saying birth control eliminates risk of pregnancy?  Then why
the need for abortion?

>BTW, when you drive down the highway, you take the risk that you will lose
>control of your car and hit a bridge (or other large object).

Are you saying that the natural result of driving a care is hitting a
bridge (or other large object)?  And don't tell my abortion is a natural
result of intercourse.  Abortion is simply a way people have come up with
to keep from having to bear (no pun intended) the consequences.  A cop-out
as Mark Modig put it.