Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-h
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:rsk
From: rsk@pucc-h (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Sunflower Farm Party Review
Message-ID: <1217@pucc-h>
Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 03:21:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: pucc-h.1217
Posted: Wed Sep 19 03:21:46 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 08:46:02 EDT
References: <1359@ihuxl.UUCP> <1211@pucc-h>
Organization: Purdue, THE Indiana University
Lines: 21

From Jeff Sargent (aeq@pucc-h)

> In many ways, I'd a darn sight rather use PROCSY (Purdue Remote On-line Console
> SYstem, the home-grown terminal system on Purdue's CDC 6000's) than Unix.
> Chief reason is, of course, that a Vax is not a computer, and thus does not
> function with more that 15 users on it; hence Unix loses much of its appeal.
> The 6000's are real computers with hair on their chests; they'd probably be
> fast even running Unix!  But this is not the group to flame about the obvious
> performance deficiencies of Unix and Vaxen.  However, I think I'd still say
> the same thing even if I were not the Purdue staff member principally
> responsible for the maintenance of PROCSY....

	Fine, Jeff...I'll be happy to turn off NetNews on Unix; you can
bring it up on PROCSY. :-) ...snarl... :-)	
-- 
---Rsk

UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs  } !pur-ee!rsk
      { decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk

Not fade away...