Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd
From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Vinyl vs. CD recordings
Message-ID: <829@opus.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 20:06:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: opus.829
Posted: Tue Sep 18 20:06:07 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 03:09:14 EDT
References: <3050@watcgl.UUCP> <61@unc.UUCP>
Organization: NBI, Boulder
Lines: 11

> But when measured by the important (admittedly subjective) measurement -- is
> it listenable -- vinyl is better, on the average, than CD.
> 
> This is because no CD's are listenable, whereas some vinyl is.  And that's
> all that matters.

Could we move this side of the discussion over to net.religion (from which
I just recently unsubscribed:-) and get on with something substantive?
-- 
Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
   ...Never offend with style when you can offend with substance.