Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site usceast.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!mcnc!ncsu!ncrcae!usceast!ted From: ted@usceast.UUCP (Ted Nolan) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: ERA Message-ID: <2116@usceast.UUCP> Date: Sat, 27-Oct-84 01:44:24 EDT Article-I.D.: usceast.2116 Posted: Sat Oct 27 01:44:24 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Oct-84 07:07:45 EDT References: <319@hou2g.UUCP> <334@pucc-k> <530@pucc-i> Reply-To: ted@usceast.UUCP (System Programmer) Organization: Csci Dept, U of S. Carolina, Columbia Lines: 47 Summary: In article <530@pucc-i> ag5@pucc-i (Henry C. Mensch) writes: > >>>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I agreed whole-heartedly that women >>>should be equals of men (and vice-versa), but I don't see any reason >>>that there has to be a law supporting this! > > Unfortunately, it does seem that we have to guarantee these >sorts of rights. Generally, if we believe in something so strongly, >we put it into writing of some sort. In the twenties, people believed >that a sober society was what they wanted; hence *that* amendment >to the Constitution. > > If we think women's rights are so important, then we should >have no problem putting this down for the record. > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Henry C. Mensch | Purdue University Computing Center >{decvax|ucbvax|sequent|icalqa|inuxc|uiucdcs|ihnp4}!pur-ee!pucc-i!ag5 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Saved by Bird's Eye Cheese Sauce!" While I certainly don't think ERA would do any harm, it seems like an unneeded cluttering of the constitution. I quote : Amendment 14 (July 28 1868) Section 1 . All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the priveleges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property , without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jusisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Doesn't that about cover it? Note the use of "person" throughout. Perhaps we just need interpretation and enforcement of what we already have. Ted Nolan ..usceast!ted -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Nolan ...decvax!mcnc!ncsu!ncrcae!usceast!ted 6536 Brookside Circle ...akgua!usceast!ted Columbia, SC 29206 ("Deep space is my dwelling place, the stars my destination") -------------------------------------------------------------------------------