Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-h
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:rsk
From: rsk@pucc-h (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: net.chess
Subject: Re: Algebraic Notation (AN) vs. Descriptive Notation (DN)
Message-ID: <1266@pucc-h>
Date: Wed, 26-Sep-84 02:33:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: pucc-h.1266
Posted: Wed Sep 26 02:33:22 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Sep-84 05:44:47 EDT
References: <149@trwspp2.UUCP>
Organization: Purdue, THE Indiana University
Lines: 13


	I use descriptive notation simply because moving a pawn
to g6 doesn't move the same mental levers as moving a pawn to kn6.

	I have a lot easier time visualizing the squares under DN; the
ambiguity is something that's never bothered me.
-- 
---Rsk

UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs  } !pur-ee!rsk
      { decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.