Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site turtlevax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!turtlevax!ken From: ken@turtlevax.UUCP (Ken Turkowski) Newsgroups: net.arch Subject: Re: "When to go to CMOS", or, "Is Schottky dead" Message-ID: <552@turtlevax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 13:05:18 EDT Article-I.D.: turtleva.552 Posted: Fri Oct 5 13:05:18 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Oct-84 06:35:47 EDT References: <537@turtlevax.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: CADLINC, Inc. @ Palo Alto, CA Lines: 20 > How close is high-speed CMOS to price parity with S or LS? Some of the > components (MSI) are dominated by packaging costs, so should be no more > than 5% more expensive than their bipolar counterparts. How about LSI > components? The new (October 4, 1984) Electronic Design has several articles on CMOS technology, including: * Technology Report: CMOS seeks to dominate the digital world * Technology Report: Analog CMOS driven by need for mixed circuitry * The future of CMOS: Twelve experts tell how CMOS will blossom * Six leading-edge CMOS IC's bring new sparkle to system design -- Ken Turkowski @ CADLINC, Palo Alto, CA UUCP: {amd,decwrl,flairvax,nsc}!turtlevax!ken ARPA: turtlevax!ken@DECWRL.ARPA