Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley
From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: A little light humor.  Or, perhaps, tragedy.
Message-ID: <9471@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Oct-84 19:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: watmath.9471
Posted: Thu Oct 18 19:19:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Oct-84 08:10:33 EDT
References: <939@ut-ngp.UUCP>, <1155@hou4b.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 26


>>> She isn't denying aid, she is actively acting against another and his
>>> property rights.  Destroying the fetus is an even greater violation of its
>>> property rights than hanging around for a few months is a violation of the
>>> women's rights.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> [hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk
>>
>>So if I pitch a tent, without permission, on someone else's property, I
>>have the right to squat there until I decide I don't need to use the
>>land anymore.
>
>	But if
>	1)  driving you off that land will cost you your life, and
>	2)  you are not responsible for the situation, and
>	3)  I drive you off the land in full knowledge of the fact,
>	I suspect that I would be prosecuted for murder.

Humm, so by your definition, countries who refuse to give asylum to political
refugees who will be murdered if they go back home (as in the case of quite
a few latin american political refugees) should be prosecuted for murder.
Funny how I've never heard of this happening.

Sophie Quigley
...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley