Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Re: A little light humor. Or, perhaps, tragedy. Message-ID: <939@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 14:45:31 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.939 Posted: Tue Sep 18 14:45:31 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 08:43:58 EDT References: <98@rlgvax.UUCP> <927@ut-ngp.UUCP> <528@oliven.UUCP> Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 16 [] > She isn't denying aid, she is actively acting against another and his property > rights. Destroying the fetus is an even greater violation of its property > rights than hanging around for a few months is a violation of the women's > rights. > > -- > [hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk So if I pitch a tent, without permission, on someone else's property, I have the right to squat there until I decide I don't need to use the land anymore. Got a back yard, hawk? The fetus is within the woman; it is allocating her resources. The woman's property rights take precedence.