Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site allegra.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!whuxle!spuxll!abnjh!u1100a!pyuxn!pyuxww!gamma!ulysses!allegra!alan From: alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Forward Women not all they're cracked up to be? Message-ID: <2813@allegra.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Sep-84 10:35:21 EDT Article-I.D.: allegra.2813 Posted: Fri Sep 28 10:35:21 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Sep-84 10:29:51 EDT References: <3178@rabbit.UUCP>, <4375@utzoo.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill Lines: 26 > While I'm in the process of getting over a breakup with a `Forward > Woman,' I thought I'd post this note for those of you who are as naive > as I was. > > Some `Forward Women' seem that way only because they're out to see how > many concurrent notches they can make on their lipstick cases (thanks, > Pat Bennatar(sp?)). I didn't realize this in general, and wasn't aware > of it in this specific case for several reasons (too boring to go into > here, but they also raise questions of honesty and trust). > > Would some of you out in netland like to respond to this accusation? Who is your "accusation" directed at? All "forward women"? Or just the ones out to put another notch on their lipstick cases? Or maybe all contributors to net.singles for not warning you? Well, I, personally, don't want to be blamed for not warning people about this sort of thing. So let me say, for the record: Generally speaking, some of any group you care to mention is a particular way. So be careful out there! (Or something like that...) -- Alan S. Driscoll AT&T Bell Laboratories