Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!cbosgd!ihnp4!fortune!tierney
From: tierney@fortune.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: ULTRIX
Message-ID: <4303@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Sep-84 23:09:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.4303
Posted: Thu Sep 20 23:09:54 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 20:42:27 EDT
Sender: notes@fortune.UUCP
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 38
Nf-ID: #R:teklds:-66500:fortune:11600101:000:1095
Nf-From: fortune!tierney    Sep 20 10:18:00 1984

I have a question about ULTRIX:

	(Background) I went to Northeastern U. in Boston,
	and we had one VAX running VMS with everything 
	you can fit into the box (mostly memory and terminal 
	boards).  Near the end of the quarter, it was not 
	unusual to find > 120 people logged on simultaneously!

	I once asked whether UNIX would not be a better OS,
	and I received the following answer:

	UNIX may be a nice OS, but it is not as efficient
	as VMS for the VAX.  In other words, I can run 
	120 users on my VAX under VMS and many fewer under
	UNIX.

MY QUESTION:

	ULTRIX was developed for VAXen by the VMS wizards at DEC.
	So how does the efficiency of VAX/ULTRIX compare to
	VAX/VMS?

	Anyone care to conjecture?  



Charlie Tierney
--------------------------------------------------------------
                  { hpda harpo ihnp4 cbosgd } !fortune!tierney
DEC                   { decvax !decwrl !amd } !fortune!tierney
Berkeley                      { ucbvax !amd } !fortune!tierney

MaBell:  (415) 595-8444
USnail:  Fortune Systems, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, California 94065