Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site tty3b.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!tty3b!mjk
From: mjk@tty3b.UUCP (Mike Kelly)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Criticism of US foreign policy
Message-ID: <514@tty3b.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Sep-84 11:05:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: tty3b.514
Posted: Mon Sep 24 11:05:13 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Sep-84 05:58:36 EDT
References: <479@tty3b.UUCP> <1731@sdcc6.UUCP>, <5971@mcvax.UUCP> <1380@qubix.UUCP> <5978@mcvax.UUCP> <137@rlgvax.UUCP>
Organization: Teletype Corp., Skokie, Ill
Lines: 34


 >From: plunkett@rlgvax.UUCP (S. Plunkett)
 >Truism 1: Criticism of the Soviet Government by a Soviet citizen,
 >in the U.S.S.R. is personally dangerous.  Truism 2: Criticism of
 >the U.S. Government by a U.S. citizen, quite apart from it being
 >a method of governing here, is not personally dangerous.
 >
 >However, to the extent that such criticism is congruent to
 >Soviet policy and aims, it is dangerous to the U.S.; certainly
 >it is not the same degree of danger for the Soviet critic in
 >the U.S.S.R., because the U.S. is big enough to absorb and with-
 >stand alot of abuse.  But criticisms based on Soviet propaganda,
 >or criticism believed to have been produced independently of
 >Kremlin machinations yet nonetheless friendly to the Soviet
 >point of view, undermines the ability of the West to survive.

 >So it is that the above quoted remark is used in an attempt
 >to bring some sense of personal responsibility to the "useful
 >idiots" who even unwittingly parrot the Kremlin line.

It is odd that some of those who most fervently defend the U.S. show
such a profound lack of understanding of what the U.S. is really all 
about.  It is as if they think the U.S. is good only because it lets
them buy all the dishwashers, microwaves and cars they want.  The fact
that there is no such thing as "acceptable" and "unacceptable" dissent
seems to them an afterthought, something willingly sacrificed for the
dishwasher.

Your theory, Scott, would qualify you for a high position within the
politburo.  You even make the reference to "idiots"; in the USSR, though,
the term is "criminally insane".  Perhaps that's really what you meant, hmm?

Mike Kelly