Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley
From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: Re: A little light humor.  Or, p
Message-ID: <9473@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Oct-84 19:35:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: watmath.9473
Posted: Thu Oct 18 19:35:05 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Oct-84 09:43:41 EDT
References: <939@ut-ngp.UUCP>, <47700015@hpfcla.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 24


>> So if I pitch a tent, without permission, on someone else's property, I
>> have the right to squat there until I decide I don't need to use the
>> land anymore.  Got a back yard, hawk?  The fetus is within the woman;
>> it is allocating her resources.  The woman's property rights take
>> precedence.
>
>The tent allegory is incomplete.  The tent (fetus) has been pitched *with*
>permission.  Remember, there had to be intercourse between consenting
>people in order for the fetus to get there...
>
>				Steve Wolf
>				[hplabs, ihnp4]!hpfcla!woof
>
During intercourse, the only permission a woman is giving to anybody is to
the man to have his penis inside her (if you want to look at it in terms
of "giving permissions").  Unless the woman specifies so, this permission
does not extend to anybody else to do anything with her body.  The above
argument is a stupid as saying that it is ok to rape a non-virgin woman
since she has given permission to one man to enter her body.  A fetus is
a THIRD party, it is not the same as its father.

Sophie Quigley
...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley