Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!emjej From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: net.os9? - (nf) Message-ID: <9300022@uokvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 00:24:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uokvax.9300022 Posted: Tue Oct 2 00:24:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:36:20 EDT Lines: 18 Nf-ID: #N:uokvax:9300022:000:624 Nf-From: uokvax!emjej Sep 18 23:24:00 1984 #N:uokvax:9300022:000:624 uokvax!emjej Sep 18 23:24:00 1984 I may be sorry I did this, but here goes: in view of the existence of the OS-9 operating system for two different processors (the 6809 and the 68000), as well as the interest expressed both in net.micro and in mail to me in said operating system, it seems to me not entirely proper that net.micro.6809 be a de facto net.os9; therefore, I wish to propose a net.os9 (as well as possible alternative names/positioning in the name tree). If consensus is that there's not sufficient traffic to merit, so be it; I merely present the idea for consideration. James Jones {uokvax,mtxinu}!ea!jejones ctvax!uokvax!emjej