Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site haring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!turing!haring!teus
From: teus@haring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: parsing host1!user@host2 - a new idea
Message-ID: <339@haring.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 21-Oct-84 16:10:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: haring.339
Posted: Sun Oct 21 16:10:29 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Oct-84 19:09:30 EDT
References: <691@sunybcs.UUCP> <1606@nsc.UUCP> <1608@nsc.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 7
Apparently-To: rnews@turing.LOCAL

The idea of having parentheses in routing addresses popped here in Europe
up for getting around the problem of "different parsing ideas in different
networks". Together with "do not touch it for rerouting" there are
enough arguments to it. I think it is a good idea. The only problem left
is: which character(s) are used for it? Are '(' and ')' suitable?
-- 
	Teus Hagen	teus@mcvax.UUCP  (CWI, Amsterdam)