Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!ucbvax!info-vlsi From: info-vlsi@ucbvax.ARPA Newsgroups: fa.info-vlsi Subject: Compilation of survey on functional testers. (long msg-5 screens) Message-ID: <2078@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Thu, 20-Sep-84 20:24:01 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.2078 Posted: Thu Sep 20 20:24:01 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 07:12:51 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 104 From: Doug FreyburgerA while ago I posted a request for information on functional testers. I was suprised at how little information is available out there on them. It seems that most people only have Tek DAS 9100's. Some people seem only to want a DAS. That suprised me a lot since the DAS has so few channels. Few people have ever heard of the Stanford MEDIUM machine, and even then it is barely more than a rumor. The only testers out there that seem in range of what I am looking for are the Stanford MEDIUM and the Terak tester. If anyone has manuals on-line for these, I'd like a copy. Are they Q-bus, IEEE-488, RS-232 interfaced? Is there a good software kernal that goes with them? What I am looking for is very many pins, 64 minumim and expanible, that will work in the 1-4Mhz range. Anyone willing to fund a project to make one? It may actually come down to cutting a proposal to do that. I think I can make a simple design for Q-bus that will be under $20K per unit after the prototype. >From: Carl.Ebeling@CMU-CS-UNH.ARPA > >The tester that we use here at CMU is a home brewed version. It >consists of a 68000 (running the popeye kernal) connected to a set of >custom chips we designed and built here that allows 128 bits of I/O to >the chip, each of which can be programmed in or out. Chips are usually >tested by writing a C program that drives and senses the chip signals >and most designers find this preferable to generating test vectors. >Using this method, the tester runs at most at about .2 Mhz which is OK for >functional testing. To do performance testing, a Tektronix DAS can be >tied in and called as a subroutine to produce test vectors at up to 25 Mhz. >Unfortunately, our DAS can only generate 15 bit vectors with the >remainder being held static by the 68000. In spite of this, we have had >little problem doing performance testing as it is fairly easy to >identify a small set of bits can be used to do perfomance testing. >From: Robert Montay > >We use a DAS 9100 logic analyser with tektronix software that allows a vax >to be a host. Figure $25K, unless you can swing a donation. >From: John Goodhue > >In the "fancy machine" domain, we have recently been dealing with a >company called LSI Testing inc. in Salem Mass (617) 745-2450. They >provide engineering resources for test program development as well >as time on their machines (Fairchild Sentry series) on a contract >basis. I believe that they have a sister company on the west coast >as well, but I do not recall their name. I think you will find that >there are many places that can do functional and/or at speed testing >for you on a contract basis, and quite a few software houses that >specialize in the development of test software. Test software is >(unfortunately) not cheap. We have been quoted $8750 for a chip >that is only moderately complex (64 signal lines, approx. 300 >vectors for good coverage). >From: gvax.kevin@Cornell.ARPA (Kevin Karplus) > >we have a somewhat slower tester based on an IBM PC with a digital >oscilliscope board. I think we have only 32 I/O pins (input or ouput in sets >of 8). It is very cheap, especially as the PCs are used in the Junior EE lab, >so no new machines were needed. Software was written to download esim files >to the PCs over a serial line, where they can be used as test vectors. There >were also some FORTH testing programs written, but I have no copies of them. >From: Ted Sabety > >We at Columbia uase a TEktronix DAS with networking software to a VAX >running UNIX as a test system. We arepretty stisfied with it. >Cost: between $12000 and 25000 depending on how much you need. >From: Vernon L. Chi > >On the academic scene, we are aware of the following activity: > >The Stanford MEDIUM Tester - Rob Mathews, Irene Watson, Dave Chenevert >of Stanford (DARPA contracts (MDA 903-79-C-0335, MDA 903-79-C-0680, >and MDA-903-80-C-0432) ... which more or less directly executes the >pin-ops constituting the SIFT test language (see MOSIS documents) >I hear Mathews and Watson are no longer at Stanford. > >The MISE (Machine for In-System Evaluation of Custom VLSI Chips) - >R. Bisani, M.J. Foster, H.T. Kung, K. Oflazer of CMU (CMU-CS-82-132) >which I'm not sure is "real", even yet. > >A Functional Tester Design for the University Environment - >Mark Sherred of MIT (gone to Amdahl), EE&CS VLSI Memo No. 82-111, >which I'm not sure is "real" either. > >The Terak Tester - V. Chi of UNC. This is a tester in the class of >the Stanford MEDIUM Tester; it's less efficient for chips with low >pin counts, but better for higher pin counts. This is "real" - we >have been using it for over two years to develop and verify logical >correctness of numerous projects. > >We have a Stanford MEDIUM Tester here. After determining the cost of DMA >interfacing (which brings its performance into line with our Terak Tester), >we have decided not to use it. > >The price of the Terak and an Andromeda interface card is about the same as >the hardware cost of interfacing the MEDIUM tester. The custom modifications >to the Andromeda card are trivial (1/2 day of technician time), and a test >head with ZIF socket will take another technician-day. ------