Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site water.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!water!rggoebel
From: rggoebel@water.UUCP (Randy Goebel)
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: Re: Clarification Regarding Teknowledge's M.1 Product
Message-ID: <20@water.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 30-Sep-84 11:30:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: water.20
Posted: Sun Sep 30 11:30:02 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 1-Oct-84 03:33:58 EDT
References: <12417@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 17

I've just read what amounts to an advertisement for Teknowledge's
M.1 software product.   I can't believe there isn't something to
be criticized in a product that comes from such an infant technology?
I'd be interested to know what's wrong with M.1?  Will Teknowledge
give it away to universities to teach students about expert systems?
Is SRI-KL using M.1 for anything (note origin of original message)?
On a lighter note, what is novel about a software system that supports
``variables?''

Randy Goebel
Logic Programming and Artificial Intelligence Group
Computer Science Department
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA N2L 3G1
UUCP:	{decvax,ihnp4,allegra}!watmath!water!rggoebel
CSNET:	rggoebel%water@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:	rggoebel%water%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa