Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie )
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Turntable questions (Lack of response)
Message-ID: <4724@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 14:31:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.4724
Posted: Wed Sep 19 14:31:45 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 20:54:04 EDT
References: <76200015@hpfclk.UUCP> <607@hound.UUCP> <805@opus.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistics Research Lab
Lines: 12

Well, this whole thing boils down to is
	1.  CD's are a more convenient format.
	2.  CD's are more tolerant of their environment (which is to
		say that technical slop is less likely to affect them).
and	3.  Records are more abundant.
	4.  Records with reasonable quality control and care can sound
		as good as their master.

This is why I own both a CD player, a Cassette deck (for recording
stuff to play in the car mostly), and a turntable.

-Ron