Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!oliven!hawk
From: hawk@oliven.UUCP (Rick)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: big brother
Message-ID: <574@oliven.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 19:28:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: oliven.574
Posted: Tue Sep 18 19:28:36 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 04:44:54 EDT
References: <216@laidbak.UUCP>
Organization: University of Waikiki
Lines: 15

Gee, Kin.  Seems like some things are reasonable to forbid because we find them
offensive but others aren't.  hmm. 

Now, before we hear a crusade against the government legislating morality, would
someone name a single law that isn't either 

	a:  based on morality of some form (drinking ages, rape, . . . )
	    That is, find a law that isn't an imposition of beliefs.

	b:  an arbitrary standard (drive on right hand side of the road, etc.)
	    That is, imposing the belief that there should be a standard

rick
-- 
[hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix]!oliveb!oliven!hawk