Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadre.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!idis!cadre!geb From: geb@cadre.UUCP Newsgroups: net.general Subject: RE: apology Message-ID: <59@cadre.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 09:01:42 EDT Article-I.D.: cadre.59 Posted: Tue Oct 9 09:01:42 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Oct-84 05:57:49 EDT Organization: Decision Systems Lab., Univ. of Pgh. Lines: 14 I would be interested in knowing if you were forced by your employers to post this "apology". I think these disclaimers are ridiculous! Is there anyone on the net stupid enough to believe that articles posted by people are officially being posted by the employer, or that the employee can speak for the employer? Anyone who thinks that is an idiot! I suspect some lawyer or would-be lawyer got worried about the legal consequences of some flame, since the computer is owned by them. Does anyone have a solution to this problem? What percentage of net traffic could be saved if these disclaimers were deleted?