Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!sri-unix!RSHAPIRO@BBNA.ARPA
From: RSHAPIRO@BBNA.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: SWL-oriented messages
Message-ID: <12601@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Oct-84 17:34:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.12601
Posted: Tue Oct  2 17:34:57 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 08:24:11 EDT
Lines: 13

From:  Richard Shapiro 

Can we agree that SWL-oriented messages are OK, but that they
should feature the letters "SWL" in the subject field? I think
it's quite a reasonable policy in general to spend some effort
in making the subject field as descriptive as a few words allow.
A new mailing list does not sound feasible.

The thanks for clarification, by the way, should go to Will
Martin rather than to me. I was only the forwarder.

richard
-------