Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:agz From: agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta) Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics Subject: Re: ERA Message-ID: <376@pucc-k> Date: Wed, 3-Oct-84 04:41:40 EDT Article-I.D.: pucc-k.376 Posted: Wed Oct 3 04:41:40 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Oct-84 01:47:06 EDT References: <319@hou2g.UUCP> <334@pucc-k> <385@ihuxo.UUCP> Organization: Alcohol Design and Application Corp. Lines: 19 > Having the Equal Rights Amendment would give women a tool to use > in court for proving discrimination. Wrong again! The ERA simply says that no laws shall be written at any legislative level discriminating against women. It has no definiton of what discrimination is, ie dress codes discussed earlier. It still remains up to the court to decide what is discrimination and what isn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andy Banta {decvax!allegra!inhp4}!pucc-k!agz Alcohol Design and Application Corp. --- Serving people over 21 years. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "The evidence before the court is quite incontrovertable. There's no need for the jury to retire. In all my years of judging I have never heard before Anything more worthy of the full penaly of the the law ... "