Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 Fluke 8/7/84; site fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!twitch!hocad!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!moriarty From: moriarty@fluke.UUCP (Jeff Meyer) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: moriarity's retort on miko Message-ID: <1445@vax2.fluke.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 11:46:41 EDT Article-I.D.: vax2.1445 Posted: Tue Oct 9 11:46:41 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Oct-84 07:17:29 EDT References: <2455@dartvax.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, WA Lines: 47 >jeff, i think you should keep in mind that we are dealing with fictional >characters, and as such, they serve a literary purpose higher than their >existence (yes, i will argue that comics are a form of literature). to >me, miko would serve a better literary purpose as a sacrifice. those who >disagree with this position, still shouldn't cast moral aspersions on others. > >i remain, with my honor intact, > >Mark Modrall >mwm Well, Heck, Mark, I don't think I *ever* cast moral aspersions on other -- I fling them, which gives one a better arc-to-altitude ratio... But seriously, I re-read my article, and I was being silly about challenging you to a duel and such (I'm much too cowardly for that... hit & run is more my style). Of course, everyone has there own opinions, and yours are as valid as mine. I'm sorry you took the "unfeeling brute" comments seriously; I thought I was being pretty clear about the intended humor (I resort only to ":-)" when I think it might be too subtle, and I don't believe it was here). And before this is relegated to a letter, I disagree with Mark's position about Miko; I also feel that comics can be "literature" (one of the most over/miss-used buzzwords in America today), and one of the factors is respect for the characters. Killing Miko off for the reasons he stated in his article seems more of a "calculated offing", which I am seeing more and more of in comics... something to get the old tear-ducts flowing, etc. It seems to me to be more of a matter that some writers can't provide emotional impact except by killing a minor or major character. Plot is not a tactical maneuver; it something to engage one's interest. This quota killing is one of the things that really bugs me about Marvel & Shooter, in general. And as to me taking these stories too seriously, hogwash. I have a very clearly-defined boundary between reality and fiction (i.e. Earth-Me and Earth-Pacific, Earth-Eclipse, etc.). Excuse me now, I have to get back to plotting the Crime of the Century before Holmes gets back from vacation... "...for DEATH awaits you all, with nasty sharp pointy teeth!" Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc. UUCP: {cornell,decvax,ihnp4,sdcsvax,tektronix,utcsrgv}!uw-beaver \ {allegra,gatech!sb1,hplabs!lbl-csam,decwrl!sun,ssc-vax} -- !fluke!moriarty ARPA: fluke!moriarty@uw-beaver.ARPA