Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site shark.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!tektronix!orca!shark!brianp From: brianp@shark.UUCP (Brian Peterson) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Vinyl vs. CD recordings Message-ID: <1072@shark.UUCP> Date: Tue, 25-Sep-84 11:36:19 EDT Article-I.D.: shark.1072 Posted: Tue Sep 25 11:36:19 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Sep-84 03:27:09 EDT References: <3050@watcgl.UUCP> <61@unc.UUCP>, <829@opus.UUCP>, <4758@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 12 LPCD If it was done in pure analog, though, all the anti-digital arguments LPCD are overcome, while all the reasons for digital are also achieved LPCD (except for the minor one of the size of the storage medium; LPs LPCD are still bigger than CDs). You are forgetting the bestest in the galaxy reason for digital music systems. (Hint: look under your fingers) For plain old >retrieval<, however, your idea (laser reading of vinyl) is a great idea. Brian Peterson {ucbvax, ihnp4, } !tektronix!shark!brianp ^ ^