Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadre.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!idis!cadre!geb
From: geb@cadre.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.general
Subject: RE: apology
Message-ID: <59@cadre.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Oct-84 09:01:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: cadre.59
Posted: Tue Oct  9 09:01:42 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Oct-84 05:57:49 EDT
Organization: Decision Systems Lab., Univ. of Pgh.
Lines: 14



I would be interested in knowing if you were forced by
your employers to post this "apology".  I think these
disclaimers are ridiculous!  Is there anyone on the
net stupid enough to believe that articles posted by
people are officially being posted by the employer,
or that the employee can speak for the employer?
Anyone who thinks that is an idiot!  I suspect some
lawyer or would-be lawyer got worried about the
legal consequences of some flame, since the computer
is owned by them.  Does anyone have a solution to
this problem?  What percentage of net traffic could be
saved if these disclaimers were deleted?