Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ritcv.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!spw2562 From: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP () Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Re*2: final argument against Message-ID: <1256@ritcv.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 12:41:24 EDT Article-I.D.: ritcv.1256 Posted: Fri Sep 14 12:41:24 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:23:52 EDT References: <929@ut-ngp.UUCP> Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY Lines: 20 [ I don't believe in line-eat... AAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIII!!! *gulp* ] > Women who become pregnant unintentionally are similar to the > the victims of muggers and arsonists, not to the criminals; all three > groups of victims have had their property rights violated. Does this mean if I invite someone I'v never seen before into my house, and they rob me while I'm gone, it's not my fault? > Women do not have any choice about the nature of their biology. > Its side effects (one of which is that they can become pregnant > by accident) should not... She got pregnant by accident? Gee, whatever could have caused that? Steve Wall ...!ritcv!ritvp!spw2562 flames to /dev/null, please.