Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site turtlevax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!turtlevax!ken
From: ken@turtlevax.UUCP (Ken Turkowski)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: "When to go to CMOS", or, "Is Schottky dead"
Message-ID: <552@turtlevax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 13:05:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: turtleva.552
Posted: Fri Oct  5 13:05:18 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Oct-84 06:35:47 EDT
References: <537@turtlevax.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: CADLINC, Inc. @ Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 20

> How close is high-speed CMOS to price parity with S or LS?  Some of the
> components (MSI) are dominated by packaging costs, so should be no more
> than 5% more expensive than their bipolar counterparts.  How about LSI
> components?

The new (October 4, 1984) Electronic Design has several articles on
CMOS technology, including:

* Technology Report: CMOS seeks to dominate the digital world

* Technology Report: Analog CMOS driven by need for mixed circuitry

* The future of CMOS: Twelve experts tell how CMOS will blossom

* Six leading-edge CMOS IC's bring new sparkle to system design

-- 
Ken Turkowski @ CADLINC, Palo Alto, CA
UUCP: {amd,decwrl,flairvax,nsc}!turtlevax!ken
ARPA: turtlevax!ken@DECWRL.ARPA