Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrba!cepu!hao!ward From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Rules question Message-ID: <1190@hao.UUCP> Date: Fri, 5-Oct-84 22:55:48 EDT Article-I.D.: hao.1190 Posted: Fri Oct 5 22:55:48 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 7-Oct-84 09:14:18 EDT References: uwmacc.317 <9652@brunix.UUCP> <245@we53.UUCP> Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 20 > What I mean, if > my metaphor applies, is that the evolotionary theory arose out of an > unqualified rejection of the idea of a creator, specifically *the* > Creator of the Judeo-Christian teachings. The rejection stemmed from > the logical conclusion that if He existed, then He had something to say > about how I live My life, something that Darwin et al. had a personal > problem with, as do the evolutionists of today. I don't suppose you can back up this incredible statement with any documentary evidence. But then why should you? Creationists don't seem to have to follow rules of logic or anything else. That statement is no crazier than any of the rest of the unsubstatiated garbage we've been seeing in this newsgroup. -- Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!ward ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley BELL: 303-497-1252 USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307