Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!consult
From: consult@uwmacc.UUCP (MACC Consultants)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Why isn't Vanessa Williams Suing?
Message-ID: <304@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Sep-84 17:07:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.304
Posted: Sun Sep 16 17:07:25 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 05:43:13 EDT
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 14

Why do I keep reading here that Vanessa Williams isn't suing?

(And the next sentence usually implies that  this shows that
she was wrong to begin with.)

According to at least two articles I've seend in the newspaper
she IS suing - both Penthouse and the photographer - for
$10,000 plus the profits.

I don't know where she came up with $10,000.  It seems like
she should have started with a million or so.

                         Sue Brunkow
                       ...seismo!uwvax!maccvax!consult