Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:agz From: agz@pucc-k (Andrew Banta) Newsgroups: net.women,net.abortion Subject: Re: ERA and abortion Message-ID: <426@pucc-k> Date: Thu, 11-Oct-84 05:52:38 EDT Article-I.D.: pucc-k.426 Posted: Thu Oct 11 05:52:38 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Oct-84 03:36:29 EDT References: <372@uwmacc.UUCP> <499@tty3b.UUCP> Organization: Dept. of Mental Instability, Purdue University Lines: 21 > Abortion is legal in the U.S. under some circumstances. So long as that > is true, why should there be discrimination against poor people? That's > what a cutoff of funding for abortion does. It says if you can afford to > pay for it, OK; otherwise, no way. That's hypocritical and wrong. Big news, buddy. That's the way capitalism is supposed to work. Abortion is a strange issue to begin with. It's not a matter of you're poor, so you can't afford a TV set or something like that. But still, *I* should have to pay for someone else getting an abortion? If that's how it is supposed to be, I think there is something wrong. But I also think that if I should have to pay for someone find/keep a job to do anything, I think it's wrong. Go ahead and toast (flame) me ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andy Banta {decvax!allegra!ihnp4}!pur-ee!pucc-k!agz Dept. of Mental Instability, Purdue University --- "I'm OK, You're a CS Major" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Nothing's good, the news is bad. The heat goes on, and it drives you mad ... "