Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1h.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!mhuxj!ihnp4!ihu1h!ajaym From: ajaym@ihu1h.UUCP (Jay Mitchell) Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics Subject: Re: ERA Message-ID: <349@ihu1h.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Sep-84 22:48:36 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1h.349 Posted: Wed Sep 19 22:48:36 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Sep-84 06:26:15 EDT References: <319@hou2g.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 9 I, for one, fit that category. I think the ERA is vague at best and does not do the need justice. Too many "what ifs" arise from a vague document especially one which will be used in court. Being a bit more specific and to the point will do the ERA and the women it should protect the most good. -- ------------------------- Jay Mitchell ihnp4!ihu1h!ajaym -------------------------