Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!ucbvax!medin
From: medin@ucbvax.ARPA (Milo Medin)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re: Disarm. & Foreign Policy - (nf)
Message-ID: <2521@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 13-Oct-84 18:53:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.2521
Posted: Sat Oct 13 18:53:08 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Oct-84 01:33:34 EDT
References: <318@ihu1e.UUCP> <22400012@ea.UUCP> <1390@vax2.fluke.UUCP> <274@whuxl.UUCP>
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 11

50K weapons are more than enough?  More than enough for what?
Those 50K are very diverse systems indeed, you cant make a 
blanket statement like that? You make no mention of accuracy
or throweight or many otheer important details.  As for freezing us
into inadaquacy and old unreliable systems such as the B-52,
I say no thank you.  Try not to be so simplistic, it tends to
make you look unintelligent.


				Milo