Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site opus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!cires!nbires!opus!dbb
From: dbb@opus.UUCP (David B. Bordeau)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics
Subject: Re: ERA
Message-ID: <901@opus.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Oct-84 17:06:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: opus.901
Posted: Mon Oct 15 17:06:39 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Oct-84 06:48:02 EDT
References: <319@hou2g.UUCP> <334@pucc-k> <385@ihuxo.UUCP> <376@pucc-k>, <386@ihuxo.UUCP> <1266@ihuxq.UUCP>
Organization: NBI,Inc, Boulder CO
Lines: 22

> In the state of Wisconsin (at least) a friend of mine applied for a loan.
> The lending institution insisted on knowing the income etc.
> My friend is a professional musician and the loan was for a vehicle (car)
> for her to use to carry her instruments and herself to and from work.
> The loan was granted but the requirement for her husbands income had to
> be filled first.
> 	The car was purchased and titled in her name but when it came time
> to get insurance she was placed in a high risk group merely because her
> husband was ina high risk group, her driving record for the past 10 
> years had not even a parking ticket on it .



 If this is actually true she could always go to another insurance company.
 I have never heard of an ins. co. raising a spouses rate just because the
 other spouse has a bad driving record when the car is in her name. Are
 you sure of all your facts? If so, what is the purpose of posting the 
 above letter, to show all ins. co. are unfair? 

                                          David  * *
                                                  ^
                                                 \_/