Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!lmaher
From: lmaher@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response - (nf)
Message-ID: <5800025@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 02:02:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5800025
Posted: Tue Jun 19 02:02:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:56:12 EDT
References: <2033@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:mit-eddie:-203300:uokvax:5800025:37777777600:688
Nf-From: uokvax!lmaher    Jun 19 01:02:00 1984

#R:mit-eddie:-203300:uokvax:5800025:37777777600:688
uokvax!lmaher    Jun 19 01:02:00 1984

I feel randwulf's remarks are unfair to  Harve  Bennett,  who  IS
making  the  movie  for Trekkies, as well as to make a profit.  I
don't see how losing  the  Enterprise  mucks  up  the  Star  Trek
universe.   The  universe doesn't care about one little starship.
And as a devoted fan, once I got over my initial shock, I  rather
like its destruction, because it shows they're not afraid to make
major changes.  I actually was in suspense as  to  whether  Spock
might be killed by the Klingons, or might not remember Kirk.  And
the suspense of uncertainty made  the  actual  outcome  far  more
enjoyable.

	Carl			(formerly uok!crigney)
	..!ctvax!uokvax!lmaher		..!duke!uok!uokvax!lmaher