Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site smu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!smu!jay
From: jay@smu.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: STII and STIII remember scenes - (nf)
Message-ID: <18200008@smu.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 15:58:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: smu.18200008
Posted: Tue Jun 19 15:58:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:47:42 EDT
References: <444@whuxle.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:whuxle:-44400:smu:18200008:000:625
Nf-From: smu!jay    Jun 19 14:58:00 1984

#R:whuxle:-44400:smu:18200008:000:625
smu!jay    Jun 19 14:58:00 1984

I can't vouch for or against, but I think the scenes were different.  The
feel and look of them (ignoring the black and white) was different.  It may
have been that they took one of the other "takes" of that scene and used
it.

    As for computer visual records... Why can't they just pick a good position
for the logical placement of holo-cameras and use a shot from that angle.
I know, I know, with high resolution holo-images, ANY view could be
manufactured from the original, but film makers seem to be extraordinarily
dense about what is logical and what isn't (at least they don't logically
explain they're rational).