Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wateng.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan
From: jamcmullan@wateng.UUCP (Judith McMullan)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: countering homophobic hate from harpo!jrl
Message-ID: <1097@wateng.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Jun-84 12:02:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: wateng.1097
Posted: Fri Jun 15 12:02:20 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Jun-84 03:11:29 EDT
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 23

Actually, if the whole world were gay then humans would probably NOT
become extinct at all.

What WOULD happen is that every child conceived would be
a wanted child. A woman who had a child would have to think carefully about
whether she wanted one and make arrangements with someone to be fertilized
(whether by artificial insemination or intercourse).

A man would also have to make the same careful, conscious, decision.
He could make arrangements to take an orphan or have a woman bear
his child for him (for pay or, if he has a good female friend, for love).

The population would probably drop (if everyone became gay overnight) but
the quality of life for children would probably rise dramatically.

harpo!jrl says that the genitals are for procreation only but the truth is
staring him/her in the face -- they aren't. A entire world of gays would
make that clear at last. Gee, it's getting to sound more and more attractive
the more I think about it!!  Women's ability to bear children would be more
valued, too. Maybe I should switch........ 

   --from the sssstickkky keyboard of JAM
   ...!{ihnp4|clyde|decvax}!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan