Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site qubix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!qubix!msc
From: msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.micro
Subject: Re: Computer Bulletin Boards Must Be Confiscated!
Message-ID: <1173@qubix.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 5-Jun-84 21:37:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: qubix.1173
Posted: Tue Jun  5 21:37:16 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Jun-84 00:48:56 EDT
References: <171@ssc-vax.UUCP>, <357@teldata.UUCP> <531@cbdkc1.UUCP>
Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA
Lines: 18

From Frank Webb -
>	this kind of posting (credit card nos, etc.) may be presumed to have
>	been either welcomed, or at least tolerated.
I thought France was the only country where guilt was presumed and innocence
had to be proven.

	>Whether the confiscation will stick, the courts will determine.  I
	>will scream like blue blazes if a well managed (read responsible)
	>sysop gets stuck.  I will not waste a lot of sympathy on this case.
How do you tell the difference between the "sleaze" operation and the well
managed operation?  More importantly what kind of law would you write to
distinguish the two.
-- 
From the TARDIS of Mark Callow
msc@qubix.UUCP,  decwrl!qubix!msc@Berkeley.ARPA
...{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!decwrl!qubix!msc, ...{ittvax,amd70}!qubix!msc

"I'm a citizen of the Universe, and a gentleman to boot!"