Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uiucuxc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!tynor
From: tynor@uiucuxc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re:Help, TT's, Cartridges, etc. - (nf)
Message-ID: <18500029@uiucuxc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-May-84 23:13:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucuxc.18500029
Posted: Wed May 30 23:13:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Jun-84 08:28:10 EDT
References: <252@whuxj.UUCP>
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:whuxj:-25200:uiucuxc:18500029:000:750
Nf-From: uiucuxc!tynor    May 30 22:13:00 1984

#R:whuxj:-25200:uiucuxc:18500029:000:750
uiucuxc!tynor    May 30 22:13:00 1984

 Re: H/K decks... 

 I currently own an H/K 400XM.  I think it sounds much better (less
 metallic) than the Nak LX-3.  Stereo Review just reviewed the new
 CD-491... they liked it a whole bunch (said it performed as well
 as decks costing twice as much...) 

 A caveat about Nak.  If you are thinking of making tapes for your
 car, or for a friend, be forewarned! Nak uses a different equilization
 curve than all other manufacturers.  Tapes made on a Nak will sound
 dull on another brand. Likewise tapes recorded on another brand sound
 a bit zingy on the Nak.

 Steve Tynor
 ihnp4!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!tynor
 University of Illinois Champagne(?)-Urbana

P.S.  I agree on your choice of power amp. (Hafler DH220)  Can't find 
a better amp for the money.