Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!floyd!whuxle!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian From: boyajian@akov68.DEC (Jerry Boyajian) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Mystery Movi{ Message-ID: <1601@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Sat, 16-Jun-84 08:20:33 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.1601 Posted: Sat Jun 16 08:20:33 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 09:41:56 EDT Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 23 > Path: decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-dcd!hpcnoe!barrett > Subject: Re:Orphaned Response > Posted: Fri Jun 22 20:04:00 1984 > > I have so much to say on how bad this movie REALLY was that I cannot > justify the amount of time and disc space it would take up to post a > proper account of it. I'll just say that it is THE worst picture I have > ever seen anywhere, bar none. Anything else I have seen I walked out on > or turned off. The only reason I stayed through it was that it was a > long walk from denver to fort collins at midnight. I wouldn't see it > again if I was offered $20. I mean it. Fine. NOW COULD YOU TELL US JUST WHAT MOVIE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT????!!! As far as I know, there is no movie in release with the title "Orphaned Response". This is a perfectly good example of why it's a good idea to give submissions their own subject headers rather than just "replying" to them and stacking up a series of re's. Oftentimes the subject ends up straying from the original, and so the header bears no relationship to what's discussed in the message. --- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC Maynard, MA) UUCP: {decvax|ihnp4|allegra|ucbvax|...}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian ARPA: boyajian%akov68.DEC@DECWRL.ARPA