Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!floyd!whuxle!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
From: boyajian@akov68.DEC (Jerry Boyajian)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Mystery Movi{
Message-ID: <1601@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Jun-84 08:20:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.1601
Posted: Sat Jun 16 08:20:33 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 09:41:56 EDT
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 23

> Path: decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-dcd!hpcnoe!barrett
> Subject: Re:Orphaned Response
> Posted: Fri Jun 22 20:04:00 1984
>
> I have so much to say on how bad this movie REALLY  was  that  I  cannot
> justify  the  amount  of  time and disc space it would take up to post a
> proper account of it.  I'll just say that it is THE worst picture I have 
> ever seen anywhere, bar none.  Anything else I have seen I walked out on 
> or turned off.  The only reason I stayed through it was that  it  was  a
> long  walk  from  denver to fort collins at midnight.  I wouldn't see it
> again if I was offered $20.  I mean it.  

Fine. NOW COULD YOU TELL US JUST WHAT MOVIE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT????!!! As far
as I know, there is no movie in release with the title "Orphaned Response". This
is a perfectly good example of why it's a good idea to give submissions their
own subject headers rather than just "replying" to them and stacking up a series
of re's. Oftentimes the subject ends up straying from the original, and so the
header bears no relationship to what's discussed in the message.

				  --- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC Maynard, MA)

UUCP:	{decvax|ihnp4|allegra|ucbvax|...}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
ARPA:	boyajian%akov68.DEC@DECWRL.ARPA