Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site smu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!smu!pedz
From: pedz@smu.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Star Trek III - II  question? - (nf)
Message-ID: <18200005@smu.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Jun-84 23:53:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: smu.18200005
Posted: Sun Jun 17 23:53:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:54:13 EDT
References: <1946@hplabsc.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:hplabsc:-194600:smu:18200005:000:409
Nf-From: smu!pedz    Jun 17 22:53:00 1984

#R:hplabsc:-194600:smu:18200005:000:409
smu!pedz    Jun 17 22:53:00 1984

I actually noticed the sequence the second time I saw STII (before I
saw STIII) and it bewildered me since I could not make sense of it
at that time.  I just passed it off as one of those things which was
to tie in with something which was left on the cutting room floor.
Little did I realize...

The greater the complexity of the mind, The greater the need for the
simplecity of play.

Perry
convex!smu!pedz