Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!mit-eddie!nessus From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) Newsgroups: net.followup,net.micro,net.legal Subject: Re: Computer Bulletin Board Confiscated Message-ID: <2009@mit-eddie.UUCP> Date: Sat, 2-Jun-84 12:46:57 EDT Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.2009 Posted: Sat Jun 2 12:46:57 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 6-Jun-84 02:33:14 EDT References: <806@sdcsvax.UUCP> <5815@mcvax.UUCP>, <1941@mit-eddie.UUCP> <941@dciem.UUCP> Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 18 Randwulf (mit-eddie!rh) writes: ... how would you like it if on one of them your home address and the type of lock on your front door (including techniques for breaking same) appeared? Someone should be held responsible for the BBoard.... And what if your home address and type of lock on your lock on your front door appeared on one of MIT's physical bulletin boards? Should MIT be responsible? Foo! Perhaps the US government should be responsible for allowing freedom of speech. Isn't the First Ammendment just so annoying! -- -Doug Alan mit-eddie!nessus Nessus@MIT-MC "What does 'I' mean"?