Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: reply to negative opinion of Star Wars
Message-ID: <722@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 5-Jun-84 11:49:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.722
Posted: Tue Jun  5 11:49:18 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Jun-84 06:43:20 EDT
References: <395@sri-arpa.UUCP> <150@ccivax.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 23

> Jacob, 
>     Do you REALLY think that we care what your personal opinion of
> Star Wars is? Especially so many years after its imminent release?
> Geeze - I just can't help thinking that's its a little presumptuous
> on your part, ya know? 
> 
>     Now if you want to write up a little review of that
> boring but expensive Star Trek sequel that just came out, I'd
> be pleased to read it and let you know whether the rest of us think its
> 'a good post'. I'll base my judgement on the criterion in 
> /usr/spool/news/etiquette, of which I have my doubts that you have read.

It's so nice to know that freedom of expression has found a home here.
As long as you don't say anything negative about something that might
conflict with someone else's opinion.

It's not bad netiquette to post contrary opinions on a topic.  Even if the
"whole world" (according to you) thinks the subject is the greatest thing
since sliced bread.
-- 
WHAT IS YOUR NAME?			Rich Rosen
WHAT IS YOUR NET ADDRESS?		pyuxn!rlr
WHAT IS THE CAPITAL OF ASSYRIA?		I don't know that ...  ARGHHHHHHHH!