Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sdcsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!davidson
From: davidson@sdcsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Numerical C
Message-ID: <869@sdcsvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 5-Jun-84 16:29:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.869
Posted: Tue Jun  5 16:29:13 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Jun-84 00:44:22 EDT
References: <1945@rlgvax.UUCP>
Organization: EECS Dept. U.C. San Diego
Lines: 7

Naturally, C++ must now be called C, and our familiar C is now old C.
The use of the term C++ has caused the problem, since it has a side
effect of modifying the referent of the term C.  If only the authors
of the system had used the name C+1, we could have avoided this
unnecessary and confusing side effect.  Be warned!

-Greg