Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uiucuxc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!tynor From: tynor@uiucuxc.UUCP Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Re:Help, TT's, Cartridges, etc. - (nf) Message-ID: <18500029@uiucuxc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-May-84 23:13:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucuxc.18500029 Posted: Wed May 30 23:13:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Jun-84 08:28:10 EDT References: <252@whuxj.UUCP> Lines: 22 Nf-ID: #R:whuxj:-25200:uiucuxc:18500029:000:750 Nf-From: uiucuxc!tynor May 30 22:13:00 1984 #R:whuxj:-25200:uiucuxc:18500029:000:750 uiucuxc!tynor May 30 22:13:00 1984 Re: H/K decks... I currently own an H/K 400XM. I think it sounds much better (less metallic) than the Nak LX-3. Stereo Review just reviewed the new CD-491... they liked it a whole bunch (said it performed as well as decks costing twice as much...) A caveat about Nak. If you are thinking of making tapes for your car, or for a friend, be forewarned! Nak uses a different equilization curve than all other manufacturers. Tapes made on a Nak will sound dull on another brand. Likewise tapes recorded on another brand sound a bit zingy on the Nak. Steve Tynor ihnp4!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!tynor University of Illinois Champagne(?)-Urbana P.S. I agree on your choice of power amp. (Hafler DH220) Can't find a better amp for the money.