Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!mit-eddie!nessus
From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.micro,net.legal
Subject: Re: Computer Bulletin Board Confiscated
Message-ID: <2009@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 2-Jun-84 12:46:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.2009
Posted: Sat Jun  2 12:46:57 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Jun-84 02:33:14 EDT
References: <806@sdcsvax.UUCP> <5815@mcvax.UUCP>, <1941@mit-eddie.UUCP> <941@dciem.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 18

Randwulf (mit-eddie!rh) writes:
	                                 ... how would you like it if on
	one of them your home address and the type of lock on your front
	door (including techniques for breaking same) appeared?  Someone
	should be held responsible for the BBoard....

And what if your home address and type of lock on your lock on your
front door appeared on one of MIT's physical bulletin boards?  Should
MIT be responsible?  Foo!  Perhaps the US government should be
responsible for allowing freedom of speech.  Isn't the First Ammendment
just so annoying!
-- 
				-Doug Alan
				 mit-eddie!nessus
				 Nessus@MIT-MC

				"What does 'I' mean"?