Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!proper!gam
From: gam@proper.UUCP (Gordon Moffett)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: "faggots and dykes" [sic]
Message-ID: <1361@proper.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Jun-84 00:58:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: proper.1361
Posted: Wed Jun 20 00:58:08 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 03:45:44 EDT
References: <2560@harpo.UUCP>
Organization: Proper UNIX, Oakland, CA
Lines: 51

> From: jrl@harpo.UUCP (jrl)
> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany
> 
>       With all this high intellectual discussion of 'gays' one question
> seems to keep popping up. If the whole world were 'gay' then mankind would
> become extinct in one generation.

If we all drove thru the same intersection at the same time we'd all
die.

>                                   The Creator gave you genitals for one reason
> only that being to procreate.

... I guess you consider masturbation and birth control to be perversions
also?  And do you urinate through your penis or have you found some other
way ...?

>                             The pleasure that we connect with this primal act
> is merely a byproduct of our large brain.

... I guess it isn't pleasurable for you, then.

>                                         Yes it probally can be said that homo-
> sexuals have ben around since the dawn of man. But it is only in the last 20
> or 30 years that they have come out of the closet. That is what happens when
> you have too many liberals in office for too many years.

... not to mention the Federal deficit!  Homosexuality, like butterscotch,
goes in and out of fashion and is held in various regards in different
cultures.

>                                                          When a 'gay' couple
> can produce a child than I will be ready to accept them into the mainstream
> of homo-sapiens. Until that happens I can only accept gays as perverts with
> severe mental problems.

Homosexuals do have children, but not very often.  As for "severe
mental problems", I'm more worried about you than them right now ....

>                       Lets have the bloody liberal faggot and dyke discussion
> take a walk to net.motss where it belongs.

You're probably right; the rest of the net -- or you, at least -- isn't
ready for dealing with sexual issues in a mature manner.

... and to top it off you don't even have the guts to sign your article.
-- 

Gordon A. Moffett

{ hplabs!nsc, decvax!sun!amd70, ihnp4!dual } !proper!gam