Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site proper.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!amd70!dual!proper!gam From: gam@proper.UUCP (Gordon Moffett) Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Mr. Ardnt's Argument Message-ID: <1395@proper.UUCP> Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 21:51:51 EDT Article-I.D.: proper.1395 Posted: Fri Jun 22 21:51:51 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 24-Jun-84 00:06:18 EDT References: <1780@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: Proper UNIX, Oakland, CA Lines: 13 I think Mr. Ardnt makes a very good argument. I beleive that he is wrong, but I must admid I cannot come up with a counter argument yet. I feel the invalidness of his argument rests not with his assertion that saying gayness is OK is a moral issue and therefore relative, but that there is a fundamental flaw in the meaning of or use of the word "moral". I also feel that (so far) his articles are relevent to this group, though he is bordering on insult. -- Gordon A. Moffett { hplabs!nsc, decvax!sun!amd, ihnp4!dual } !proper!gam