Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: reply to negative opinion of Star Wars Message-ID: <722@pyuxn.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-Jun-84 11:49:18 EDT Article-I.D.: pyuxn.722 Posted: Tue Jun 5 11:49:18 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 6-Jun-84 06:43:20 EDT References: <395@sri-arpa.UUCP> <150@ccivax.UUCP> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J. Lines: 23 > Jacob, > Do you REALLY think that we care what your personal opinion of > Star Wars is? Especially so many years after its imminent release? > Geeze - I just can't help thinking that's its a little presumptuous > on your part, ya know? > > Now if you want to write up a little review of that > boring but expensive Star Trek sequel that just came out, I'd > be pleased to read it and let you know whether the rest of us think its > 'a good post'. I'll base my judgement on the criterion in > /usr/spool/news/etiquette, of which I have my doubts that you have read. It's so nice to know that freedom of expression has found a home here. As long as you don't say anything negative about something that might conflict with someone else's opinion. It's not bad netiquette to post contrary opinions on a topic. Even if the "whole world" (according to you) thinks the subject is the greatest thing since sliced bread. -- WHAT IS YOUR NAME? Rich Rosen WHAT IS YOUR NET ADDRESS? pyuxn!rlr WHAT IS THE CAPITAL OF ASSYRIA? I don't know that ... ARGHHHHHHHH!