Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site smu.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!smu!pedz From: pedz@smu.UUCP Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: Star Trek III - II question? - (nf) Message-ID: <18200005@smu.UUCP> Date: Sun, 17-Jun-84 23:53:00 EDT Article-I.D.: smu.18200005 Posted: Sun Jun 17 23:53:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:54:13 EDT References: <1946@hplabsc.UUCP> Lines: 14 Nf-ID: #R:hplabsc:-194600:smu:18200005:000:409 Nf-From: smu!pedz Jun 17 22:53:00 1984 #R:hplabsc:-194600:smu:18200005:000:409 smu!pedz Jun 17 22:53:00 1984 I actually noticed the sequence the second time I saw STII (before I saw STIII) and it bewildered me since I could not make sense of it at that time. I just passed it off as one of those things which was to tie in with something which was left on the cutting room floor. Little did I realize... The greater the complexity of the mind, The greater the need for the simplecity of play. Perry convex!smu!pedz