Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekchips.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!floyd!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!tektronix!tekchips!terryl From: terryl@tekchips.UUCP (Terry Laskodi) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: "...Temple of Doom", a PRO review! Message-ID: <836@tekchips.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Jun-84 19:08:32 EDT Article-I.D.: tekchips.836 Posted: Fri Jun 1 19:08:32 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 5-Jun-84 08:18:07 EDT References: <458@ccieng5.UUCP>, <3481@fortune.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 17 Well, just to add my two cents worth to this discussion, I would like to refute one point someone made comparing violence between the two Indiana Jones movies. The point made was that the violent content of the two movies was roughly the same. Maybe so, but the point I would like to make is that the violent content of Raiders was mostly fantasy(when was the last time you saw someone's face melt away after openning a magic box?), whereas the violent content in Temple of Doom was more realistic (like someone else already pointed out in a previous article child abuse, etc.). For me at least, it was all of the explicit and realistic violence that turned me off to the movie. Terry Laskodi of Tektronix