Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site burdvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!akgua!psuvax1!burdvax!droms From: droms@burdvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Motorola monitor and Xerox 820-I (reposting) Message-ID: <1576@burdvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Jun-84 08:07:13 EDT Article-I.D.: burdvax.1576 Posted: Tue Jun 12 08:07:13 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 21-Jun-84 01:16:44 EDT Organization: System Development Corporation, Paoli PA Lines: 21 (Please excuse this reposting; this article has already appeared in net.wanted and net.micro.cpm.) I bought a Motorola TTL-compatible monitor from the Xerox Mfg. Outlet in Texas which was claimed to be compatible with the Xerox 820-I boards from the same source. Has anyone else tried using this combination of equipment? I'm having a problem with the video display beginning before the vertical retrace is complete; about 10 horizontal scans are "folded" down from the top of the screen and overlap the remaining horizontal scans. I know the board works correctly when connected to a composite video monitor through an appropriate composite video generator. It appears that the vertical retrace is slower than the video generator on the 820-I board expects. Should I blame the monitor, the 820-I board or an incompatibility between the two? If the two are incompatible, what can I do to fix them? One solution is to stretch out the vertical retrace time on the 820-I board; unfortunately, that timing is all done with counters and requires cutting traces to adjust the values loaded into the counters. - Ralph Droms