Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!hound!rfg From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Ugly Square Waves - Not all are...some are purty! Message-ID: <532@hound.UUCP> Date: Sun, 17-Jun-84 23:52:44 EDT Article-I.D.: hound.532 Posted: Sun Jun 17 23:52:44 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 07:03:23 EDT References: <4@sunybcs.UUCP> <428@ihu1g.UUCP>, <926@eosp1.UUCP> <527@hound.UUCP>, <305@intelca.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 13 [] Yes, Harmon Kardon did make a big deal of their square wave response, but would you believe the early sixties? Also a lot of others. Whenever a speaker mfr can come up with one you will be sure he lets you know it. Off hand I believe the following spkr mfrs have pointed out their sqwv response: Acoustat and well , ..practically any electrostatic mfr and those who like to point out their time or phase alignment. Most of then can probably coax out a respectable square wave if the frequency, mike position and room acoustics (dead) are suitably manipulated. hound!rfg