Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxa!wetcw
From: wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Innocent Sandanistas
Message-ID: <793@pyuxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Jun-84 09:00:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxa.793
Posted: Mon Jun 11 09:00:44 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Jun-84 23:57:58 EDT
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 20

Ken P says that Ed Asner is no flaming leftist.  A very curious
claim indeed.  I would certainly hate to see what he considers
a flaming leftist if Asner is to the right.  The image of
Lucifer comes to mind, but not being into religion, it fades.
In case you are wondering Perlow, the Sandinistas would very
much like to aquire certain territories now under the government
of Honduras.  This argument has been seething for 100 years.
When the Sandies came to power, the vowed to take certain areas
of Honduras and El Salvador.  Where now is the threat of
imminent invasion?  Further, why are the ships gathered at
the docks of Honduras, not off-loading food and medical supplies
instead of arms, the most common complaint of the people
on the streets of Honduras?  And, have you noticed the registry
of those ships?  If the Sandies are so damned innocent, why are
they gathering offensive weapons instead of defensive weapons?
Would that things could be so liberally simple.  Try looking
beyond the simplistic liberal reports and discover what is
behind the Sandanista revolution.  Innocent farmers they are
not.
T. C. Wheeler