Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!houxz!vax135!floyd!cmcl2!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!prophet
From: prophet@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Stereo and Audio Magazines
Message-ID: <7479@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Jun-84 15:58:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.7479
Posted: Wed Jun 13 15:58:55 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Jun-84 01:47:01 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 27


<>

In addition to the lack of Classical Music reviews in Stereo Review magazine,
I have also noticed that the technical articles  are  becomming  more  poorly
written as time goes by.  The articles (in general) seem to be less and  less
technical.  Of the big three (Audio, High Fidelity, and  Stereo  Review),   I
think that Audio is the best all-around Stereo magazine.  I subscribe to both
Audio and Stereo Review, and it seems as though Stereo Review articles  state
only things that are obvious to me.  Audio's  technical  articles  are   more
technically-oriented.  I intend to keep my subscription to Audio, but I  will
eventually drop the Stereo Review subscription for the above reasons.    Does
anyone in netland have any opinions on some of the "Underground" Hi-Fi   mag-
azines?  I would be interested in subscribing  to one  of  the  "underground"
magazines.  Unfortunately, they don't seem to be available on newsstands, and
the cost of subscribing to most of them is pretty high, so I  would  like  to
hear from those of you subscribing to one of these magazines.  In particular,
what do you think of the magazines, and do you think they are worth the  sub-
stantially high cost of subscribing?

                                 Dennis

-- 
Call-Me:   Dennis Gibbs, Univ. of Md. Comp. Sci. Center.
UUCP:	   {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!prophet
CSNet:	   prophet@umcp-cs
ARPA:	   prophet.umcp-cs@CSNet-Relay