Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!lmaher From: lmaher@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: Orphaned Response - (nf) Message-ID: <5800025@uokvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 02:02:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uokvax.5800025 Posted: Tue Jun 19 02:02:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:56:12 EDT References: <2033@mit-eddie.UUCP> Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R:mit-eddie:-203300:uokvax:5800025:37777777600:688 Nf-From: uokvax!lmaher Jun 19 01:02:00 1984 #R:mit-eddie:-203300:uokvax:5800025:37777777600:688 uokvax!lmaher Jun 19 01:02:00 1984 I feel randwulf's remarks are unfair to Harve Bennett, who IS making the movie for Trekkies, as well as to make a profit. I don't see how losing the Enterprise mucks up the Star Trek universe. The universe doesn't care about one little starship. And as a devoted fan, once I got over my initial shock, I rather like its destruction, because it shows they're not afraid to make major changes. I actually was in suspense as to whether Spock might be killed by the Klingons, or might not remember Kirk. And the suspense of uncertainty made the actual outcome far more enjoyable. Carl (formerly uok!crigney) ..!ctvax!uokvax!lmaher ..!duke!uok!uokvax!lmaher