Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1.chuqui 4/7/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: faggots and dykes
Message-ID: <1059@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 14-Jun-84 12:41:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.1059
Posted: Thu Jun 14 12:41:48 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Jun-84 00:41:58 EDT
References: <2560@harpo.UUCP>
Organization: The Warlocks Cave
Lines: 83

>                 Oh I can feel the flames already . . . . . . . .
>                                                 harpo!jrl

Hoo boy, understatement of the year...

>      With all this high intellectual discussion of 'gays' one question
>seems to keep popping up. If the whole world were 'gay' then mankind would
>become extinct in one generation. 

Bad assumption on a number of levels. It is possible for homosexuals to
have children, and growing numbers are. Artificial insemination is one
possibility. In a few years parthenogenisis will be a possibility as well.
If the fate of civilisation is involved, I'm sure you'll even find a few
hardy women who can overcome their revulsion with the male body and do it
for humanity. Besides, making the assumption that everyone is gay is like
making the assumption that everyone isn't. Silly, silly, silly. If you put
25 programmers in a room you will get 30 different opinions on a subject.
Why should it be different with sex?

>The Creator gave you genitals for one reason
>only that being to procreate. The pleasure that we connect with this primal act
>is merely a byproduct of our large brain. 

Hmmm... that isn't where I notice the pleasure but that's beside the point.
If the Creator (what a nice amorphous way of pointing out that the reason
you are so any-gay is because your God told you to be-- so much for
thinking for yourself) really wanted Sex (with a capital S, thank God) to
be simply for procreation then It would have kept us amoeba's because we
wouldn't have to worry about things like partners. Sex is a much more
complicated subject than that. Anthropological studies have shown that the
reason the sex is fun is directly linked to the intelligence of man. Lower
animals have sex only during times of ovulation. Lower animals also tend to
be polygamous and the young tend to be born quickly and become independent
quickly. Humans (and to a lesser extent our brothers the primates) take a
lot longer to mature and the woman is less able to fend for both herself
and her sibling. To survive the latter months of pregnancy and the early
months of the child they invented recreational sex. This new and improved
feature allows the woman to keep a man from wandering so that he will be
more willing to take care of her. 

>Yes it probally can be said that homo-
>sexuals have ben around since the dawn of man. But it is only in the last 20
>or 30 years that they have come out of the closet. 

bullshit. They have always been around. Many famous names in history were
gay and acknowledge as such. Look for biographical works that haven't been
rewritten by the puritanical elite.

>That is what happens when
>you have too many liberals in office for too many years. When a 'gay' couple
>can produce a child than I will be ready to accept them into the mainstream
>of homo-sapiens. 

See my previous comments on gay childrearing. If it takes too many liberals
in office for too many years to allow people to live their lives the way
they want to without fear (or excessive fear considering the current
situation) of retribution then I'm for it. Harrasing Gays for being gay is
no better than what happened to the 'witches' in Salem in the 1600's. The
only difference is that Salem used physical torture and the current crop of
bigots is limited to psychological torture.

>Until that happens I can only accept gays as perverts with
>severe mental problems. Lets have the bloody liberal faggot and dyke discussion
>take a walk to net.motss where it belongs.

People who automatically write off an entire (and non-trivial) section of
the population based on a biased and incorrect stereotype (this, my
friends, is called bigotry whether is is Nazism and Jews, Rednecks and
Blacks, or assholes and gays) are the people with the real problem. If you
can't look past the walls and see the people, you really don't know what it
means to live. Forcing people to conform to your internal stereotypes may
make your life a little more stable, but it also makes it a lot less real.

chuq


-- 
From the ledge of the seventh cornice:			Chuq Von Rospach
{amd70,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4}!nsc!chuqui			(408) 733-2600 x242

Love is the process of my leading you gently back to yourself.
			- Saint Exupery