Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site qubix.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!qubix!msc From: msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.micro Subject: Re: Computer Bulletin Boards Must Be Confiscated! Message-ID: <1173@qubix.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-Jun-84 21:37:16 EDT Article-I.D.: qubix.1173 Posted: Tue Jun 5 21:37:16 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Jun-84 00:48:56 EDT References: <171@ssc-vax.UUCP>, <357@teldata.UUCP> <531@cbdkc1.UUCP> Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA Lines: 18 From Frank Webb - > this kind of posting (credit card nos, etc.) may be presumed to have > been either welcomed, or at least tolerated. I thought France was the only country where guilt was presumed and innocence had to be proven. >Whether the confiscation will stick, the courts will determine. I >will scream like blue blazes if a well managed (read responsible) >sysop gets stuck. I will not waste a lot of sympathy on this case. How do you tell the difference between the "sleaze" operation and the well managed operation? More importantly what kind of law would you write to distinguish the two. -- From the TARDIS of Mark Callow msc@qubix.UUCP, decwrl!qubix!msc@Berkeley.ARPA ...{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!decwrl!qubix!msc, ...{ittvax,amd70}!qubix!msc "I'm a citizen of the Universe, and a gentleman to boot!"