Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!jejones
From: jejones@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Inappropriate Postings - (nf)
Message-ID: <3400016@ea.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Jun-84 23:17:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.3400016
Posted: Fri Jun 15 23:17:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:42:34 EDT
References: <1385@cbosgd.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:cbosgd:-138500:ea:3400016:000:604
Nf-From: ea!jejones    Jun 15 22:17:00 1984

#R:cbosgd:-138500:ea:3400016:000:604
ea!jejones    Jun 15 22:17:00 1984

I bow to better English usage. What I should have said is

	"Why should notes pervert itself...?"

"Pervert" is the right word--the whole purpose of notes is
to provide linkage between notes and responses to them.
Intentionally breaking the link between a note and its
response is a violation of this notion.

Now, I have heard from folks that there is a hack for notes
to conform to netnews usage. If this keeps the linkage for
notes while keeping up appearances for netnews, then this is
fine--I don't know enough about the subject to say whether
it's possible. We'll see, I suppose.

					James Jones