Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site astrovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!astrovax!elt
From: elt@astrovax.UUCP (Ed Turner)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Light & gravitons from black holes
Message-ID: <365@astrovax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 4-Jun-84 10:20:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: astrovax.365
Posted: Mon Jun  4 10:20:14 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Jun-84 00:58:52 EDT
References: <344@kpnoa.UUCP>
Organization: Princeton Univ. Astrophysics
Lines: 12

(Hi Nigel, Indeed I believe I do remember you.)

You are of course quite correct about the possibility of avoiding the
singularity in spinning charged black holes.  I did not mention this
in my article because highly charged black holes are very unlikely to
exist in nature as you are undoubtedly aware.

Do you know what the solution for a charged but not spinning hole looks
like? I either never knew or have forgotten.

Ed Turner
astrovax!elt