Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site zehntel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!dave
From: dave@zinfandel.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Re: Re: Save with replace '@:' trashes f - (nf)
Message-ID: <1515@zehntel.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Jun-84 04:25:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: zehntel.1515
Posted: Wed Jun  6 04:25:27 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Jun-84 07:08:16 EDT
Sender: root@zehntel.UUCP
Organization: Zehntel Inc., Walnut Creek, CA
Lines: 16

#R:tektroni:-265500:zinfandel:19800009:000:275
zinfandel!dave    May 31 11:15:00 1984

I have heard that using '@0:file' works better than just '@:file'.  Does
anybody else have any comments on this?


Dave Funk
Zehntel, Inc.
2625 Shadelands Drive
Walnut Creek, CA  92598
(415) 932-6900 x309

     ....!decvax!sytek!zehntel!dave
     ...."zehntel!dave"@BERKELEY