Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site zehntel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!dave From: dave@zinfandel.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm Subject: Re: Re: Save with replace '@:' trashes f - (nf) Message-ID: <1515@zehntel.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Jun-84 04:25:27 EDT Article-I.D.: zehntel.1515 Posted: Wed Jun 6 04:25:27 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Jun-84 07:08:16 EDT Sender: root@zehntel.UUCP Organization: Zehntel Inc., Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 16 #R:tektroni:-265500:zinfandel:19800009:000:275 zinfandel!dave May 31 11:15:00 1984 I have heard that using '@0:file' works better than just '@:file'. Does anybody else have any comments on this? Dave Funk Zehntel, Inc. 2625 Shadelands Drive Walnut Creek, CA 92598 (415) 932-6900 x309 ....!decvax!sytek!zehntel!dave ...."zehntel!dave"@BERKELEY