Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxa!wetcw From: wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Innocent Sandanistas Message-ID: <793@pyuxa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Jun-84 09:00:44 EDT Article-I.D.: pyuxa.793 Posted: Mon Jun 11 09:00:44 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 11-Jun-84 23:57:58 EDT Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J. Lines: 20 Ken P says that Ed Asner is no flaming leftist. A very curious claim indeed. I would certainly hate to see what he considers a flaming leftist if Asner is to the right. The image of Lucifer comes to mind, but not being into religion, it fades. In case you are wondering Perlow, the Sandinistas would very much like to aquire certain territories now under the government of Honduras. This argument has been seething for 100 years. When the Sandies came to power, the vowed to take certain areas of Honduras and El Salvador. Where now is the threat of imminent invasion? Further, why are the ships gathered at the docks of Honduras, not off-loading food and medical supplies instead of arms, the most common complaint of the people on the streets of Honduras? And, have you noticed the registry of those ships? If the Sandies are so damned innocent, why are they gathering offensive weapons instead of defensive weapons? Would that things could be so liberally simple. Try looking beyond the simplistic liberal reports and discover what is behind the Sandanista revolution. Innocent farmers they are not. T. C. Wheeler