Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site smu.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!houxz!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!smu!jay From: jay@smu.UUCP Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: STII and STIII remember scenes - (nf) Message-ID: <18200008@smu.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 15:58:00 EDT Article-I.D.: smu.18200008 Posted: Tue Jun 19 15:58:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 05:47:42 EDT References: <444@whuxle.UUCP> Lines: 14 Nf-ID: #R:whuxle:-44400:smu:18200008:000:625 Nf-From: smu!jay Jun 19 14:58:00 1984 #R:whuxle:-44400:smu:18200008:000:625 smu!jay Jun 19 14:58:00 1984 I can't vouch for or against, but I think the scenes were different. The feel and look of them (ignoring the black and white) was different. It may have been that they took one of the other "takes" of that scene and used it. As for computer visual records... Why can't they just pick a good position for the logical placement of holo-cameras and use a shot from that angle. I know, I know, with high resolution holo-images, ANY view could be manufactured from the original, but film makers seem to be extraordinarily dense about what is logical and what isn't (at least they don't logically explain they're rational).