Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wateng.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan From: jamcmullan@wateng.UUCP (Judith McMullan) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: countering homophobic hate from harpo!jrl Message-ID: <1097@wateng.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Jun-84 12:02:20 EDT Article-I.D.: wateng.1097 Posted: Fri Jun 15 12:02:20 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 16-Jun-84 03:11:29 EDT Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 23 Actually, if the whole world were gay then humans would probably NOT become extinct at all. What WOULD happen is that every child conceived would be a wanted child. A woman who had a child would have to think carefully about whether she wanted one and make arrangements with someone to be fertilized (whether by artificial insemination or intercourse). A man would also have to make the same careful, conscious, decision. He could make arrangements to take an orphan or have a woman bear his child for him (for pay or, if he has a good female friend, for love). The population would probably drop (if everyone became gay overnight) but the quality of life for children would probably rise dramatically. harpo!jrl says that the genitals are for procreation only but the truth is staring him/her in the face -- they aren't. A entire world of gays would make that clear at last. Gee, it's getting to sound more and more attractive the more I think about it!! Women's ability to bear children would be more valued, too. Maybe I should switch........ --from the sssstickkky keyboard of JAM ...!{ihnp4|clyde|decvax}!watmath!wateng!jamcmullan