FromSubjectReceived
mats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 (actually, partitioned releases) Tue, 5-Jun-84 07:51:04 EDT
hart@cp1.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Tue, 5-Jun-84 07:51:36 EDT
boylan@dicomed.UUCP (Chris Boylan) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Tue, 5-Jun-84 08:26:44 EDT
jpj@mss.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Tue, 5-Jun-84 08:46:01 EDT
ech@spuxll.UUCP (Ned Horvath) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Tue, 5-Jun-84 20:15:46 EDT
knutson@ut-ngp.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 6-Jun-84 01:00:31 EDT
scottt@tektronix.UUCP Re: net.digital: low overhead refresh controller? Wed, 6-Jun-84 02:29:15 EDT
agk@ihuxq.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 6-Jun-84 02:35:31 EDT
aoki@trwspp.UUCP 68020 vs. 32032 Wed, 6-Jun-84 04:19:50 EDT
jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 6-Jun-84 06:31:30 EDT
jml@drutx.UUCP (LeonJM) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 6-Jun-84 06:39:32 EDT
boylan@dicomed.UUCP (Chris Boylan) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 6-Jun-84 07:13:55 EDT
jsgray@watmath.UUCP (Jan Gray) Re: 68020 vs. 32032 Thu, 7-Jun-84 02:33:18 EDT
lamarche@micomvax.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Thu, 7-Jun-84 07:42:44 EDT
lamarche@micomvax.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Thu, 7-Jun-84 07:43:05 EDT
brownell@harvard.UUCP RISC bibliography (longish) Thu, 7-Jun-84 19:24:03 EDT
eugene@ames-lm.UUCP (Eugene Miya) Posting announcements for ACM SIGBIG to net.arch and ba.general Fri, 8-Jun-84 01:36:38 EDT
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Re: 68020 vs. 32032 Fri, 8-Jun-84 17:16:57 EDT
crp@stcvax.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Sat, 9-Jun-84 00:11:42 EDT
ron@brl-vgr.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Sat, 9-Jun-84 00:13:26 EDT
bytebug@pertec.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Sat, 9-Jun-84 07:52:26 EDT
kurt@fluke.UUCP (Kurt Guntheroth) Re: 68020 vs. 32032 Sat, 9-Jun-84 08:05:18 EDT
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: What's in a 3b2? Sun, 10-Jun-84 01:07:42 EDT
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: What's in a 3b2? Sun, 10-Jun-84 01:08:20 EDT
eugene@ames-lm.UUCP Additional RISC bibliography Sun, 10-Jun-84 01:25:09 EDT
ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie ) Re: IBM 4300 look-alike wanted Sun, 10-Jun-84 01:55:07 EDT
elh@edison.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Sun, 10-Jun-84 02:07:23 EDT
ken@turtlevax.UUCP net.digital: Floating-point chips Mon, 11-Jun-84 00:39:13 EDT
dave@qtlon.UUCP (Dave Lukes) Re: AT&T and the 3B*2: FLAME! Tue, 12-Jun-84 04:25:56 EDT
wm@tekchips.UUCP (Wm Leler) Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Tue, 12-Jun-84 04:58:58 EDT
hammond@mouton.UUCP Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Wed, 13-Jun-84 00:11:59 EDT
dgary@ecsvax.UUCP Re: AT&T and the 3B*2 Wed, 13-Jun-84 00:56:51 EDT
phil@amd70.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Re: 68020 vs. 32032, pros and cons Wed, 13-Jun-84 02:21:05 EDT
ctk@ecsvax.UUCP What's in a 3b2? Wed, 13-Jun-84 04:55:30 EDT
emigh@ecsvax.UUCP Re: What's in a 3b2? Wed, 13-Jun-84 04:55:46 EDT
blenko@rochester.UUCP (Tom Blenko) Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Wed, 13-Jun-84 06:57:59 EDT
hammond@mouton.UUCP Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Thu, 14-Jun-84 00:11:02 EDT
rde@ukc.UUCP (R.D.Eager) Re: RE: Why Not Virtual Files? Thu, 14-Jun-84 00:56:15 EDT
nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) Re: 68020 vs. 32032, pros and cons Thu, 14-Jun-84 01:17:34 EDT
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: 68020 vs. 32032, pros and cons Thu, 14-Jun-84 06:37:07 EDT
bob@islenet.UUCP Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Fri, 15-Jun-84 02:02:53 EDT
davecl@mako.UUCP Re: Re: 68020 vs. 32032, pros and cons Tue, 19-Jun-84 01:14:09 EDT
phipps@fortune.UUCP Chip Speed / Re: 68020 vs. 32032, ... Tue, 19-Jun-84 01:18:47 EDT
zrm@mit-eddie.UUCP (Zigurd R. Mednieks) Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Wed, 20-Jun-84 00:31:22 EDT
ron@brl-vgr.UUCP Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Wed, 20-Jun-84 00:45:54 EDT
kds@intelca.UUCP Re: Chip Speed / Re: 68020 vs. 32032, ... Wed, 20-Jun-84 00:54:41 EDT
mark@umcp-cs.UUCP 3b2 performance. Wed, 20-Jun-84 01:06:01 EDT
mark@umcp-cs.UUCP How many suns does it take to screw in a light bulb? Wed, 20-Jun-84 01:07:10 EDT
tut@ucbopal.CC.Berkeley.ARPA 3B2 performance not phenomenal? Thu, 21-Jun-84 02:19:39 EDT
toby@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Toby Harness) Re: AT&T's new Personal Computer Thu, 21-Jun-84 03:35:44 EDT
ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie ) Re: 3b2 performance. Thu, 21-Jun-84 04:30:16 EDT
mwm@ea.UUCP Re: Re: AT&T and the 3B*2: FLAME! - (nf) Fri, 22-Jun-84 03:55:56 EDT
mats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann) Re: AT&T vs. the toolkit approach Fri, 22-Jun-84 06:56:28 EDT
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: Re: AT&T and the 3B*2: FLAME! Fri, 22-Jun-84 07:33:44 EDT
pete@lvbull.UUCP (pete) Re: Re: Re: Pyramid architectural restraints Fri, 22-Jun-84 09:38:20 EDT
rcc@imsvax.UUCP AT&T's new Personal Computer Fri, 22-Jun-84 10:05:13 EDT
eric@aplvax.UUCP Re: 3B2 performance not phenomenal? Fri, 22-Jun-84 20:34:25 EDT
nam@allegra.UUCP (Nam Sung Woo) any good way of implementing "recursion" in the dataflow model ? Sat, 23-Jun-84 04:16:15 EDT
darrelj@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Darrel VanBuer) Re: Re: AT&T and the 3B*2: FLAME! Sat, 23-Jun-84 04:16:43 EDT
phil@amd70.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Re: 68020 vs. 32032, pros and cons Tue, 26-Jun-84 00:25:02 EDT