Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site denelcor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!denelcor!lmc From: lmc@denelcor.UUCP (Lyle McElhaney) Newsgroups: net.news.b Subject: article duplications Message-ID: <481@denelcor.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 15:36:51 EDT Article-I.D.: denelcor.481 Posted: Tue Jun 19 15:36:51 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 21-Jun-84 06:02:43 EDT Organization: Denelcor, Aurora, CO Lines: 49 I've recently been wondering why we are getting what seems to me to be a lot of repeat messages. I haven't much heard anyone else complaining, so I suspect I've missed a bug fix somewhere along the line. Anyway, it seems the most of the problems stem from having a message originate from a site that supports more than one domain. I received a message (one of many) twice from bbncca, once with the ARPA domain and once via UUCP. The history lines are: <778@bbncca.ARPA> Wed, 13-Jun-84 20:51:56 MDT net.unix-wizards/6863 net.lang.c/1753 <778@bbncca.UUCP> Thu, 14-Jun-84 02:12:12 MDT net.unix-wizards/6877 The headers show that the mail reached us through two different paths: Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site denelcor.UUCP Path: denelcor!hao!seismo!cmcl2!floyd!whuxle!mit-eddie!genrad! decvax!bbncca!keesan From: keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.lang.c Subject: Re: unsigned char -> unsigned int conversion Message-ID: <778@bbncca.ARPA> Date: Tue, 12-Jun-84 08:20:27 MDT Article-I.D.: bbncca.778 Posted: Tue Jun 12 08:20:27 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 13-Jun-84 20:51:56 MDT References: <183@haddock.UUCP> Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma. Lines: 30 Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site denelcor.UUCP Path: denelcor!hao!seismo!cmcl2!rna!n44a!wjh12!vaxine!linus!bbncca!keesan From: keesan@bbncca.UUCP Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: unsigned char -> unsigned int conversion Message-ID: <778@bbncca.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Jun-84 08:20:27 MDT Article-I.D.: bbncca.778 Posted: Tue Jun 12 08:20:27 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Jun-84 02:12:12 MDT References: <183@haddock.UUCP> Lines: 30 I've also received pairs of articles via UUCP and SUN (the Australian network). Has anyone else seen this and/or fixed it? It doesn't seem to hard to imagine a fix to the history mechanism that scrubs the domain from the entry, but it seems a little kludgey. Any words? Thanks and regards, -- Lyle McElhaney (hao,brl-bmd,nbires,csu-cs,scgvaxd)!denelcor!lmc