Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!hound!rfg
From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Ugly Square Waves - Not all are...some are purty!
Message-ID: <532@hound.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Jun-84 23:52:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: hound.532
Posted: Sun Jun 17 23:52:44 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 07:03:23 EDT
References: <4@sunybcs.UUCP> <428@ihu1g.UUCP>, <926@eosp1.UUCP> <527@hound.UUCP>, <305@intelca.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 13

[]
Yes, Harmon Kardon did make a big deal of their square wave response, but
would you believe the early sixties? Also a lot of others. Whenever a
speaker mfr can come up with one you will be sure he lets you know it.
Off hand I believe the following spkr mfrs have pointed out their sqwv response:
Acoustat and well

, ..practically any electrostatic mfr and those who like to point out their
time or phase alignment. Most of then can probably coax out a respectable
square wave if the frequency, mike position and room acoustics (dead)
are suitably manipulated.  hound!rfg