Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dalcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!dartvax!dalcs!holmes
From: holmes@dalcs.UUCP (Ray Holmes)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography - (nf)
Message-ID: <704@dalcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Feb-84 03:22:55 EST
Article-I.D.: dalcs.704
Posted: Mon Feb 27 03:22:55 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 28-Feb-84 07:18:21 EST
References: <941@inmet.UUCP>
Organization: Dalhousie U, Halifax N.S.
Lines: 25

[]
Extract from Beth Mazur's article (starts with a G. C. Scott movie):

>   ...
>   The really scary part of this movie was at the very end.  The producer
>   was making a rape/murder movie, and to make it "realistic", the female
>   star of the film (within the movie) was actually killed, knifed to death
>   I believe.  Then George rescues his daughter and there's a happy ending.
>   Left me pretty unsettled.  This was a network TV movie, by the way.
>   ...

There called, I believe, "snuff films" (the ones where the 'star' is murdered
on film). The 'star' (usually a runaway, or someone else without traces) gets
to be a film star for the one and (obviously) only time in their life.  They
are exceedingly expensive, BUT NOT that hard to come by (so I am told).

There was also another such reference in the film (I forget the title) about
Marlyn Monroe's early film career.

There are obviously lots of REALY sick people out there.  This is, to my
mind, far worse than "kiddie porn".

					Ray