Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA From: Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA ("Benson I. Margulies") Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: return-path Message-ID: <840307010402.021078@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA> Date: Tue, 6-Mar-84 20:04:00 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.387 Posted: Tue Mar 6 20:04:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 7-Mar-84 06:45:17 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 3 To: header-people@MIT-MC.ARPA As Mr. Crispin pointed at length last week, the RFC specifies that RETURN-PATH is explicitly supposed to serve as a target of complaints, and NOT as a reply address or anything else.