Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site basser.SUN Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!mulga!munnari!basser!kvm From: kvm@basser.SUN (Karlos Mauvtaque) Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd Subject: Re: X is broken in 4.2bsd Message-ID: <233@basser.SUN> Date: Thu, 8-Mar-84 02:14:09 EST Article-I.D.: basser.233 Posted: Thu Mar 8 02:14:09 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Mar-84 10:44:53 EST Organization: Dept of C.S., University of Sydney Lines: 15 There seems to be a lot of news of late based on the following templates: "I tried using X in 4.2bsd and it is broken, but I've fixed it. The diffs follow." "Why did they change X in 4.2bsd? It breaks everything in sight." "I have something for 4.2bsd which simulates what everyone elses UNIX does." "Try X on your 4.2bsd system and watch it trash Y." "You need spaces after an X to make Y work in 4.2bsd." Is 4.2 really this disastorous or is it AT&T propoganda generated by a shell script on research? How about Dennis?