Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver (laser-lovers) Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers Subject: id AA18734; Fri, 2 Mar 84 07:16:48 pst Message-ID: <865@uw-beaver> Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 13:15:19 EST Article-I.D.: uw-beave.865 Posted: Fri Mar 2 13:15:19 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 4-Mar-84 06:49:07 EST Sender: root@uw-beave Organization: U of Washington Computer Science Lines: 21 From decwrl!baskett@Shasta Fri Mar 2 10:15:13 1984 Date: 2 Mar 1984 0716-PST (Friday) From: Forest BaskettSubject: Re: LN01 vs. Xerox 2700 Message-Id: <8403021516.AA29109@ACETES> Received: by ACETES (3.327/4.04) 2 Mar 84 07:16:03 PST (Fri) To: William LeFebvre Cc: texhax@su-score, laser-lovers@washington In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 2 Mar 84 00:07:17 CST. <322.phil.Dione@Rice> ReSent-date: Fri 2 Mar 84 10:11:37-PST ReSent-from: Richard Furuta ReSent-to: "Laser Lovers": ; As far as I can tell, the DEC LN01 is very similar to the Xerox 2700. The electronics are the same, as you can quickly tell by just looking inside. There are some 8086 code changes in the LN01 aimed at adding some new features but I don't think they affect font file formats and other limitations of the 2700. Forest