Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!mcnc!unc!brl-bmd!Human-Nets-Request@rutgers From: Human-Nets-Request%rutgers@brl-bmd.UUCP (Human-Nets-Request@rutgers) Newsgroups: fa.human-nets Subject: HUMAN-NETS Digest V7 #25 Message-ID: <823@brl-bmd.UUCP> Date: Fri, 16-Mar-84 22:06:20 EST Article-I.D.: brl-bmd.823 Posted: Fri Mar 16 22:06:20 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Mar-84 00:56:49 EST Lines: 159 HUMAN-NETS Digest Friday, 16 Mar 1984 Volume 7 : Issue 25 Today's Topics: Query - Employee Environments, Response to Query - Setting Read Times, Information - Bell National Security Group In Operation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 9 March 1984 1800-pst From: Jerry BakinSubject: Employee Environments Cc: Bakin @ HI-MULTICS, WORKS @ RUTGERS I am trying to change the "Standard Cube" where I work on the basis that it is too small, provides insufficient resources, and hence depresses employee productivity. To prove this, I am trying to write a small research paper showing the effects of certain resources on worker productivity. I have only one small problem: I know nothing about this. I have developed two lists to help me, a list of questions I would like to answer, and a list of places to look for answers. I would like to include these two lists here, and ask for the net response. Any other questions that need to be answered? Any more places to look for responses? Do you know of any specific studies (hopefully supportive) that respond to these questions. While I have a vested interest pertaining to software engineering, I am looking for any information that is available. While I would also like to know what the standards are at your company is, I would first like to make a standard machine analyzable questionaire which I hope to post to the net in two weeks. Of course, a summary will be posted in human-nets, but don't expect one soon. Also, I would appreciate mail sent to: Bakin @ HI-Multics In all of this I am trying to show that Maximum Productivity does imply a need for employee comfort. List of Questions to be examined: o What is Productivity? o What is Efficiency? o How are creature comforts taken into place in Productivity and/or Efficiency? o What is the Productivity Equation? o What is the Efficiency Equation? o How much floor space is needed per employee for maximum Productivity/Efficiency? o How much unoccupied floor space? o How much table/desk space? o How much clear table/desk space? o How much storage space? (bookshelves, filing cabinets) o What questionaires have been designed for these studies? o What questions should be included in such studies? Software Engineering adds the following Questions: o How much computing power per engineer? o How many engineers per terminal? o How much table space near each terminal? o What kind of hardcopy power? o Power of Terminals? o How should terminals be arranged? Terminal Rooms, or A Terminal on every Desk? List of Places to Look for Answers: (Note how blank these are, do you know where I should look for these?) Productivity Studies: (Where would I find these?) Human Factors Studies: "" Quality of Work Life Studies: "" Work Station Justifications: "" Are there studies specific to: Engineers? "" Software engineers? "" Okay, where would YOU begin? Jerry. ------------------------------ Date: Sat 10 Mar 84 15:24:17-PST From: Lynn Gold Subject: Read times in presentations To: US.JFA%CU20B@COLUMBIA-20.ARPA Funny you should mention this...I'm working on a film project in which I'll be shooting crt screens and printer output for a class out here. I was once given the following formula which I intend to use: Time yourself as you read the passage slowly out loud to yourself. Add 3-5 seconds to that time, depending on how much information is on display (i.e., if it's less than five words, go on the light side; if it's a screenful of credits, go on the heavy side), or just count to four. Ideally, you want the info to stay on the screen long enough for people to read it, but not so long that they get bored. When in doubt, you're better off making them wait, rather than causing them to lose information. Good luck! --Lynn ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-84 18:40 PST From: William Daul Tymshare OAD Cupertino CA Subject: Bell's National Security Group In Operation To: TELECOM@MIT-MC Cc: weeks@ames-vms, ARC.TYM@OFFICE-2 >From MICROWAVE SYSTEM NEW (Feb. 1984) The Central Services Organization of the seven Bell Regional Holding Companies said that its National Security and Emergency Preparedness (NS/EP) Group, located in Washington D.C., is now operating to meet the nationwide telecommunications planning and response needs of the Bell companies. In order to meet NS/EP requirements after the split-up of the Bell System the federal court agreement requires that the company establish and maintain a centralized communications group as a single point of contact for all national security and emergency preparedness matters, Marvin Konow, director of the group said. The group will advise and provide coordination to the Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) in the development of national security and emergency preparedness technical standards and nationwide telecommunications planning. An emergency alerting and respone center has been formed to alert the BOCs in the event of an emergency or crisis, the spokesperson said. The group will also participate in national industry-wide groups sponsored by the government to coordinate emergency and crisis communications activities and nationwide network planning. ------------------------------ End of HUMAN-NETS Digest ************************