Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekecs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: If I can't see it, it's not there (clarification) Message-ID: <3544@tekecs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 01:44:09 EST Article-I.D.: tekecs.3544 Posted: Fri Mar 2 01:44:09 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 26-Feb-84 01:12:57 EST Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 10 I think you people are taking me a bit too literally. What I meant was that one should be wary of believing in such subtle influences precisely because they are so hard to prove and because that belief tends toward paranoia. I didn't mean to say that they absolutely do not exist. And of course, I didn't mean "see" to be something you do just with your eyes (or any of your senses). I would say that the title of this article was the *least* important of the statements in my earlier article. the misunderstood, Jeff Winslow