Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site erix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!mcvax!enea!erix!per
From: per@erix.UUCP (Per Hedeland)
Newsgroups: net.followup,eunet.followup
Subject: Re: Private Opinions: an Inquiry
Message-ID: <293@erix.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 04:16:26 EST
Article-I.D.: erix.293
Posted: Wed Feb 29 04:16:26 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Mar-84 05:21:00 EST
References: <209@haring.UUCP> <1014@cbosgd.UUCP> <5712@mcvax.UUCP>
Organization: L M Ericsson, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 10

<>

There is a related point, though: An employee might due to his work have
access to e g classified information, which to a great extent influences
his "personal" opininions. In this case, while he can freely express those
opinions, he is prevented from fully motivating them. (Perhaps that means
that it would be best not to even express them?)

Per Hedeland
..{decvax, philabs}!mcvax!enea!erix!per  or  per@erix.UUCP