Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wucs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!afinitc!wucs!eric
From: eric@wucs.UUCP (Eric Kiebler)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: What Can't C Do? (strings)
Message-ID: <151@wucs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Mar-84 20:56:49 EST
Article-I.D.: wucs.151
Posted: Wed Mar 21 20:56:49 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Mar-84 04:16:56 EST
References: <58@utastro.UUCP>
Organization: Wash. Univ. in St. Louis, CS Dept.
Lines: 18

[And down in the lovely muck I've lain;  Happy -- 'til I woke again!]

For a good example of "lets give each function name an infix
operator", look at Icon.  That language is Martian.  Powerful,
but Martian nonetheless.  It is the kind of language you will like if
you like that kind of language.

We could always drag APL through the dirt, but it's supposed to look like that.

Has anyone out there developed any packages of macros or preprocessors
to add abstract data types to C?  Was it worthwhile if so?

Has anyone out there used PPI's objective-C?  How about class-c from
Always Talking and Talking?

eric
-- 
..!ihnp4!afinitc!wucs!eric