Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!tower From: tower@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: How about net.nutrition?? - (nf) Message-ID: <968@inmet.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 23:56:21 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.968 Posted: Wed Feb 29 23:56:21 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 5-Mar-84 00:26:31 EST Lines: 24 #R:bpa:-21900:inmet:7000042:000:767 inmet!tower Feb 28 22:59:00 1984 net.cooks and net.veg should serve the net.nutrition needs. net.med and net.bio should serve the net.malnutrition needs. If you really feel, that you need this group, please choose one of the above and let see some discussion on nutritional issues, before the group gets established! I follow all four of the above groups, and have seen little about nutrition in them. Certainly not enough traffic to need another group... This isn't a NO vote. I do not believe news.groups should be form by votes. It's a statement: "Let see a lot of news items before forming yet another group". -len tower harpo!inmet!tower Cambridge, MA PS: The other useful criteria is: "There has been too much X in net.Y, lets move it out." Clearly doesn't apply here.