From | Subject | Received |
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) |
in defence of C
|
Sat, 25-Feb-84 22:22:34 EST |
turner@ucbesvax.UUCP |
enum, bit fields, cpp...
|
Sun, 26-Feb-84 00:28:37 EST |
wolfe@mprvaxa.UUCP (Peter Wolfe) |
C optimizers (slight? FLAME)
|
Sun, 26-Feb-84 01:19:36 EST |
padpowell@wateng.UUCP (PAD Powell [Admin]) |
Re: C optimizers (slight? FLAME)
|
Mon, 27-Feb-84 07:39:15 EST |
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) |
Re: enum, bit fields, cpp...
|
Tue, 28-Feb-84 00:40:04 EST |
dvk@mi-cec.UUCP (Dan Klein) |
C Neatener - a postscript
|
Tue, 28-Feb-84 15:30:32 EST |
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) |
the mythical NOSTRICT keyword
|
Tue, 28-Feb-84 19:05:06 EST |
jdb@mordor.UUCP |
Re: Precedence Question - (nf)
|
Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:11:55 EST |
mark@umcp-cs.UUCP |
Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9)
|
Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:47:42 EST |
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP |
Re: enum, bit fields, cpp...
|
Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:48:29 EST |
arnold@gatech.UUCP |
cxref cross referencing program bug fix posted.
|
Thu, 1-Mar-84 02:42:37 EST |
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) |
Re: enum, bit fields, cpp...
|
Thu, 1-Mar-84 03:05:45 EST |
jas@druxy.UUCP (ShanklandJA) |
Re: Precedence Question (again)
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 00:23:25 EST |
reg@vaxine.UUCP (Rick Genter) |
What do *YOU* think of typedefs? (A long message)
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 00:23:57 EST |
bet@ecsvax.UUCP |
Update on C compiler query for IBM S-370 under OS/MVS
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 05:33:44 EST |
turner@ucbesvax.UUCP |
Re: enum, bit fields, cpp...
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:31:18 EST |
ldl@genix.UUCP |
Re: Identifier significance CHALLENGE
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:39:24 EST |
keashly@mprvaxa.UUCP (Lance Keashly) |
Help with portable C compiler porting
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:45:12 EST |
crl@pur-phy.UUCP (Charles LaBrec) |
Re: Precedence Question - (nf)
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 07:45:11 EST |
ldl@genix.UUCP |
Re: typedef in c
|
Fri, 2-Mar-84 11:11:44 EST |
dan@rna.UUCP |
String and constant #defines, Summation
|
Sat, 3-Mar-84 09:20:45 EST |
joe@teltone.UUCP (Joe) |
Assignment to pointers to functions returning void
|
Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:36:27 EST |
ee161acv@sdccs5.UUCP |
Dynamic structures in C
|
Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:50:05 EST |
sa@byucsa.UUCP |
Automated Standards: Query/Offer
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:24:46 EST |
karn@allegra.UUCP (Phil Karn) |
Re: Assignment to pointers to functions returning void
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:46:16 EST |
greg@sdcsvax.UUCP |
Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs?
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:46:55 EST |
dvk@mi-cec.UUCP (Dan Klein) |
Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9)
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:54:46 EST |
greg@sdcsvax.UUCP |
Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs?
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 02:01:48 EST |
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) |
Re: Assignment to pointers to functions returning void
|
Sun, 4-Mar-84 02:31:16 EST |
ado@elsie.UUCP |
Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs
|
Mon, 5-Mar-84 00:25:15 EST |
rjk@mgweed.UUCP (Randy King) |
Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs
|
Mon, 5-Mar-84 01:18:16 EST |
wls@astrovax.UUCP |
Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9)
|
Tue, 6-Mar-84 01:01:20 EST |
alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll) |
Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9)
|
Tue, 6-Mar-84 02:45:22 EST |
msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow) |
Re: C optimization and debugging.
|
Wed, 7-Mar-84 00:25:23 EST |
baskett@decwrl.UUCP (Forest Baskett) |
Optimizing C and portable Bliss compilers
|
Wed, 7-Mar-84 00:25:59 EST |
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) |
Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs
|
Wed, 7-Mar-84 06:58:38 EST |
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) |
New LINT gag wanted
|
Wed, 7-Mar-84 08:27:24 EST |
reg@vaxine.UUCP (Rick Genter) |
A followup to my typedefs article
|
Thu, 8-Mar-84 00:11:17 EST |
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) |
Re: Re: typedef in C
|
Thu, 8-Mar-84 19:21:52 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) |
Re: typedef in c (recursive structs)
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:46:29 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) |
Re: C optimization and debugging.
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:47:49 EST |
plw@mgweed.UUCP (Pete Wilson) |
pointer question
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 12:46:30 EST |
johanw@ttds.UUCP (Johan Wide'n) |
Re: New LINT gag wanted
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:19:04 EST |
keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) |
Re: New LINT gag wanted
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:21:21 EST |
bet@ecsvax.UUCP |
Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MVS request
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:37:40 EST |
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) |
Re: RISC perspective
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:19:15 EST |
chris@eneevax.UUCP |
more on C optimization
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:23:46 EST |
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) |
Re: New LINT gag wanted
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:28:34 EST |
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) |
Re: A followup to my typedefs article
|
Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:33:27 EST |
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) |
inconsistency in C manual
|
Sun, 11-Mar-84 00:24:05 EST |
barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin) |
Re: pointer question
|
Sun, 11-Mar-84 07:05:26 EST |
hal@cornell.UUCP (Hal Perkins) |
Re: Improving C
|
Mon, 12-Mar-84 05:40:21 EST |
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) |
Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Mon, 12-Mar-84 05:42:25 EST |
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Mon, 12-Mar-84 07:23:46 EST |
decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot) |
yacc %token value #defines
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:30:05 EST |
decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot) |
lint bug: f((int) double expr)
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:30:26 EST |
smoot@ut-sally.UUCP (Smoot Carl-Mitchell) |
Re: Improving C
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:46:13 EST |
dave@qtlon.UUCP (Dave Lukes) |
Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:35:24 EST |
bet@ecsvax.UUCP |
C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL?
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:40:51 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) |
What Can't C Do?
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:41:56 EST |
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 20:38:26 EST |
minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin Minow) |
Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized"
|
Tue, 13-Mar-84 20:38:57 EST |
tjt@kobold.UUCP |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:08:27 EST |
alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll) |
(char *) NULL
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:39:06 EST |
ark@rabbit.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) |
yet another null pointer idea
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:39:21 EST |
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:56:43 EST |
tgg@hou5e.UUCP |
Re: RISC perspective
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 19:49:13 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Wed, 14-Mar-84 20:37:28 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL?
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:27:24 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:27:42 EST |
msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow) |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:34:16 EST |
paul@uiucuxc.UUCP |
Re: Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MV - (nf)
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:03:46 EST |
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) |
C Bigotry
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:21:27 EST |
wcs@homxa.UUCP (Bill Stewart HO 4K-437 x0705) |
Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized"
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:25:46 EST |
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) |
if sizeof (char*) == 4 then sizeof (int) MUST = 4 (K&R)
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:45:34 EST |
guido@mcvax.UUCP (Guido van Rossum) |
Is mixing char and int types as parameters portable?
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:15:33 EST |
stew@harvard.UUCP (Stew Rubenstein) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:18:42 EST |
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) |
Re: RISC perspective -- register variables
|
Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:24:55 EST |
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP |
Re: more on C optimization
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 00:28:16 EST |
hamilton@uiucuxc.UUCP |
Re: pointer question - (nf)
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 00:36:15 EST |
dcn@ihuxl.UUCP (Dave Newkirk) |
Language Independent Code Optimization?
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 02:05:11 EST |
martillo@ihuxt.UUCP (Yehoyaqim Shemtob Martillo) |
Re: pointer question - (nf)
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 02:57:56 EST |
hom@hocda.UUCP (H.MORRIS) |
Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 03:05:18 EST |
johnl@haddock.UUCP |
Re: Orphaned Response - (nf)
|
Fri, 16-Mar-84 07:44:58 EST |
tjt@kobold.UUCP |
Re: if sizeof (char*) == 4 then sizeof (int) MUST = 4 (K&R)
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:37:29 EST |
hans@log-hb.UUCP (Hans Albertsson) |
Re: pointer question
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:39:13 EST |
smk@axiom.UUCP (Steven M. Kramer) |
Re: RISC perspective
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:39:45 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:42:39 EST |
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) |
Re: pointer question
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:43:48 EST |
gurr@west44.UUCP (Dave Gurr) |
Re: C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL?
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:50:14 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP |
Re: What Can't C Do? (struct & string compares)
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:54:43 EST |
mcewan@uiucdcs.UUCP (mcewan ) |
Re: Precedence Question - (nf)
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:56:25 EST |
mcewan@uiucdcs.UUCP (mcewan ) |
Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs? (A - (nf)
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:56:40 EST |
lwall@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Larry Wall) |
Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized"
|
Sat, 17-Mar-84 04:02:15 EST |
kendall@wjh12.UUCP (Sam Kendall) |
Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83
|
Sun, 18-Mar-84 01:37:36 EST |
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) |
C Bigotry (Erratum)
|
Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:22:28 EST |
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP |
Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83
|
Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:31:38 EST |
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:36:35 EST |
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) |
Re: read(fd,&y,sizeof y)
|
Mon, 19-Mar-84 07:16:51 EST |
dmmartindale@watcgl.UUCP (Dave Martindale) |
Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized"
|
Mon, 19-Mar-84 07:22:54 EST |
ggr@hudson.UUCP (Guy Riddle) |
Re: register variables in C
|
Mon, 19-Mar-84 08:07:42 EST |
nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) |
Re: What Can't C Do? (strings)
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 00:38:21 EST |
mnc@hou2g.UUCP (#M.CONDICT) |
Re: Orphaned Response - (nf)
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 00:47:08 EST |
nathan@orstcs.UUCP |
Re: Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MV
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:29:34 EST |
keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) |
Re: inconsistency in C manual
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:35:00 EST |
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) |
To C or not to C...
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:36:02 EST |
bet@ecsvax.UUCP |
C compiler for IBM OS/MVS -- final word
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:40:30 EST |
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) |
Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized"
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:41:12 EST |
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) |
Re: structure and array and string comparisons
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:41:31 EST |
leiby@masscomp.UUCP |
Re: Improving C
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:42:36 EST |
lfm@ukc.UUCP (L.Marshall) |
"void" for V7
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 02:06:11 EST |
guido@mcvax.UUCP (Guido van Rossum) |
Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary).
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 06:25:17 EST |
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) |
Re: structure and array and string comparisons
|
Tue, 20-Mar-84 06:27:50 EST |
hamilton@uiucuxc.UUCP |
Re: Re: What Can't C Do? (struct & strin - (nf)
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 00:47:18 EST |
emjej@uokvax.UUCP |
Re: C: is it just another descendant of - (nf)
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 00:57:19 EST |
phipps@fortune.UUCP (Clay Phipps) |
Explicit "Unknown" Arg Type / Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok?
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 01:07:33 EST |
phil@unisoft.UUCP (Phil Ronzone) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 01:09:44 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: What Can't C Do? (strings)
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:23:57 EST |
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:48:31 EST |
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP |
Re: inconsistency in C manual
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:48:56 EST |
bet@ecsvax.UUCP |
C language problems -- maybe we should leave it be?
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:27:26 EST |
aaw@pyuxss.UUCP (Aaron Werman) |
Re: What Can't C Do?
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:33:58 EST |
brt@pyuxvv.UUCP (B Reytblat) |
help! (rather long)
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:34:13 EST |
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) |
Re: Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary).
|
Wed, 21-Mar-84 04:56:25 EST |
cwc@uw-june (Winnie Chow) |
AT&T C/370
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 00:46:37 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: structure and array and string comparisons
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:25:04 EST |
rcd@opus.UUCP |
Re: structure and array and string comparisons
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:25:18 EST |
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) |
Re: Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary).
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:28:38 EST |
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) |
Re: help! (much shorter)
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:28:53 EST |
budd@arizona.UUCP |
little quiz
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 02:29:09 EST |
eric@wucs.UUCP |
Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 04:16:13 EST |
eric@wucs.UUCP (Eric Kiebler) |
Re: What Can't C Do? (strings)
|
Thu, 22-Mar-84 04:16:56 EST |
waterloop@watmath.UUCP (waterloop) |
re: c compilers for the 370
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:22:57 EST |
scarton@inmet.UUCP |
Re: C compiler for IBM OS/MVS -- final w - (nf)
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:36:29 EST |
tgg@hou5e.UUCP |
Re: little quiz
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:44:00 EST |
hom@hocda.UUCP (H.MORRIS) |
Re: "sizeof(int) < sizeof(char *): a defense"
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:04:41 EST |
neal@denelcor.UUCP (Neal Weidenhofer) |
Re: little quiz
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:40:30 EST |
neal@denelcor.UUCP (Neal Weidenhofer) |
Re: structure and array and string comparisons
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:41:18 EST |
jbf@ccieng5.UUCP (Jens Bernhard Fiederer) |
preprocessor question
|
Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:41:53 EST |