Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!rhea!squirt!arndt
From: arndt@squirt.DEC
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Flash for Scott Renner
Message-ID: <6069@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Mar-84 16:46:46 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.6069
Posted: Tue Mar  6 16:46:46 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Mar-84 07:21:41 EST
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 27

From:	SMURF::ARNDT           6-MAR-1984 16:53  
To:	SQUIRT::ARNDT
Subj:	Scott R

Scott Renner, you are really too much.  Let me just walk you through
what you sent me.

"You ask for a difference between human life in the womb and human life
outside of it.  I think the point is irrelevant." (I assume that what
follows is you supporting argument) "If the fetus is not human, then
surely it has no rights." (Agreed. No HUMAN rights) "If it is human,
then it does have rights, but no more than any other person." (Agreed.
)  "In particular it does not have any right to occupy the body of the
mother." (I can't picture a human fetus with human rights that doesn't
have the right to exist in the only place where it CAN exist or by the
very nature of things where it DOES exist!  Isn't that sort of like saying
to a human "You have the right to exist but not on this earth!"?  Scott baby,
lighten up.  Give the poor fetus you agree for the sake of argument is
human SOMEPLACE to exist!  I'd hate to have you for a landlord.)

Your next paragraph is a real chiller.  You admit (as I always suspected of
pro-abortion folks) that you
kill for less than the defense of your life.  Sad, Sad.  Ain't you got no
religion?  Hope I never get in your way.  But then I'd be defending my
life and (with great sadness) kill you first.

Regards,