Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site mcvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!mcvax!piet
From: piet@mcvax.UUCP (Piet Beertema)
Newsgroups: net.followup,eunet.followup
Subject: Re: Private Opinions: an Inquiry
Message-ID: <5712@mcvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Feb-84 06:05:50 EST
Article-I.D.: mcvax.5712
Posted: Mon Feb 27 06:05:50 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 28-Feb-84 22:39:06 EST
References: <209@haring.UUCP> <1014@cbosgd.UUCP>
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 16

<>

Sorry Mark, but you missed the point: my inquiry is not about the
(in)ability to give somehow restricted information, but about the
freedom to publicly give a *personal* or *private* opinion on certain
topics. And it's for that reason that I specially pointed at the
newsgroup (eu)net.politics.

Second I know very well the difference between moderation and censorship,
but since the boundary between those two is very vague, censorship tends
to euphemistically be presented as "moderation". That's why I did (and
do) *not* speak about moderation, but about "moderation".
-- 
	Piet Beertema
	CWI (Center for Math. & Comp. Science), Amsterdam
	...{decvax,philabs}!mcvax!piet