Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA From: MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: RESENT field :) Message-ID: <357@hou3c.UUCP> Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 10:08:00 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.357 Posted: Fri Mar 2 10:08:00 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:42:14 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 7 To: Bakin.SSID@HI-MULTICS Cc: HEADER-PEOPLE@MIT-MC Cc: Mooers@BBNA In-Reply-To: The message of 1 March 1984 13:37 pst from Bakin.SSID at HI-MULTICS I agree completely that "RESENT" is an unfortunate choice. I was told that Dave Crocker thought it was cute. At the time that RFC822 was written, HERMES and MSG used "REDISTRIBUTED" and MM used "REMAILED". I don't know that anyone was using "RESENT". HERMES spells the fields "ReSent". What else can you do? ---Charlotte