Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekig1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!tektronix!tekig1!rickb From: rickb@tekig1.UUCP (Rick Bensene) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Fuel Economy? Message-ID: <1584@tekig1.UUCP> Date: Mon, 19-Mar-84 13:41:05 EST Article-I.D.: tekig1.1584 Posted: Mon Mar 19 13:41:05 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:31:51 EST References: <2095@ihuxf.UUCP>, <426@sequent.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 35 Since everyone and their brother seems to be reporting the fuel consumption rates on their automobiles (and motorcycles), I guess I might as well toss this in and see what happens: Vehicle Best Worst Average Comments ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ *1967 Camaro 396/375 HP 6.1 0.8 5.2 Estimates. Worst figure acheived at dragstrip. *1967 Firebird 400/325 HP 13.9 7.2 11 2.80 gears - rotten in the city, great (relatively) on hiway. *1969 Camaro Z/28 302/290?HP 13.1 4.8 9.1 City driving really sucks up the gas here. 1968 Impala, Warm 327 17.5 8.6 12.6 I had this car during the gas crunch, and drove it >50 mi. round trip to work. EXPENSIVE! 1982 Ford EXP 1.6L DOG 37.9 19 29 DOG says it all! *1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo 33.0 21.7 25.8 9100 miles so far. 2.2L FI No long hiway trips yet. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Vehicles still owned and driven on regular basis. Rick Bensene ..tektronix!tekig1!rickb