Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!tower
From: tower@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: How about net.nutrition?? - (nf)
Message-ID: <968@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 23:56:21 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.968
Posted: Wed Feb 29 23:56:21 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 5-Mar-84 00:26:31 EST
Lines: 24

#R:bpa:-21900:inmet:7000042:000:767
inmet!tower    Feb 28 22:59:00 1984

net.cooks and net.veg should serve the net.nutrition    needs.
net.med   and net.bio should serve the net.malnutrition needs.

If you really feel, that you need this group, please choose
one of the above and let see some discussion on nutritional
issues, before the group gets established!

I follow all four of the above groups, and have seen little
about nutrition in them. Certainly not enough traffic to
need another group...

This isn't a NO vote. I do not believe news.groups should be
form by votes.

It's a statement:
"Let see a lot of news items before forming yet another group".

-len tower        harpo!inmet!tower        Cambridge, MA

PS: The other useful criteria is: "There has been too much
X in net.Y, lets move it out." Clearly doesn't apply here.