Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83
Message-ID: <5976@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Mar-84 17:41:07 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.5976
Posted: Sat Mar 17 17:41:07 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:31:38 EST
References: <374@wjh12.UUCP> <430@wjh12.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 10

I'm quite possibly the one who said that there is no "p" for which
"(p)[0]" and "*p" were different, and you're right, pointer to
function makes the former illegal.  I just tried giving it to
the 4.1BSD C compiler and it produces a "compiler error" no less!
I wonder if the System V PCC has the same bug (I consider it a bug
when your compiler announces an internal error for bad input).
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci
UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris.umcp-cs@CSNet-Relay