Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site basser.SUN
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!mulga!munnari!basser!kvm
From: kvm@basser.SUN (Karlos Mauvtaque)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: X is broken in 4.2bsd
Message-ID: <233@basser.SUN>
Date: Thu, 8-Mar-84 02:14:09 EST
Article-I.D.: basser.233
Posted: Thu Mar  8 02:14:09 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Mar-84 10:44:53 EST
Organization: Dept of C.S., University of Sydney
Lines: 15

There seems to be a lot of news of late based on the following templates:

"I tried using X in 4.2bsd and it is broken, but I've fixed it.
The diffs follow."

"Why did they change X in 4.2bsd?  It breaks everything in sight."

"I have something for 4.2bsd which simulates what everyone elses UNIX does."

"Try X on your 4.2bsd system and watch it trash Y."

"You need spaces after an X to make Y work in 4.2bsd."

Is 4.2 really this disastorous or is it AT&T propoganda generated by a
shell script on research?  How about Dennis?