Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA
From: Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA ("Benson I. Margulies")
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: return-path
Message-ID: <840307010402.021078@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 6-Mar-84 20:04:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.387
Posted: Tue Mar  6 20:04:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 7-Mar-84 06:45:17 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 3
To: header-people@MIT-MC.ARPA

As Mr.  Crispin pointed at length last week, the RFC specifies that
RETURN-PATH is explicitly supposed to serve as a target of complaints,
and NOT as a reply address or anything else.