Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!wjh12!n44a!ima!inmet!grw
From: grw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: id AA18424; Mon, 20 Feb 84 12:08:28 - (nf)
Message-ID: <932@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Feb-84 05:46:38 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.932
Posted: Fri Feb 24 05:46:38 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Feb-84 15:45:45 EST
Lines: 22

#R:decwrl:-571000:inmet:2700056:000:987
inmet!grw    Feb 23 11:41:00 1984

Having used Omnis and Horizons on several occasions I can only say that I have
never seen a car that deteriorates faster (we're talking falling apart in
front of your eyes) then the Chrysler twins.  Lee sure missed a chance to
junk those two cars when remaking the 'new' Chrysler Corp a few years back.
It amazes me how Chrysler was able to steal a design from VW and Ford, use
(at least in the first few years) a VW engine and transmission, and still
wind up with a lousy car.  The Rabbit and the Fiesta were and still are much
superior to the Omin/Horizon.  

Past experience with Chrysler cars indicates that after ~1967 the company
made about 1 good auto - the Dart/Valiant - and then replaced that one
success story with the Volare/Aspen loosers.  I've used a 74 Plymouth wagon
for a while and a 73 Plymouth Fury III both of which were LOUSY LOUSY LOUSY!!!


					-- Gary Wasserman
					...harpo!inmet!grw
					...hplabs!sri-unix!cca!ima!inmet!grw
					...yale-comix!ima!inmet!grw