Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!wjh12!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!mark
From: mark@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: generalized suspend wanted
Message-ID: <5535@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-Feb-84 22:39:04 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.5535
Posted: Tue Feb 28 22:39:04 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Mar-84 00:16:52 EST
References: <8348@arizona.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 9

The big problem with generalized suspend is what to do with the
file descripters.  We have a hack here, written by Rehmi Post,
that can reach into the kernel and re-attatch file descripters
to previously suspended jobs.  But its real dangerous and
no one uses it.  If you think of an elegant solution to the
file re-attachment problem, let's hear it.
-- 
Spoken: Mark Weiser 	ARPA:	mark@maryland
CSNet:	mark@umcp-cs 	UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!mark