FromSubjectReceived
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) in defence of C Sat, 25-Feb-84 22:22:34 EST
turner@ucbesvax.UUCP enum, bit fields, cpp... Sun, 26-Feb-84 00:28:37 EST
wolfe@mprvaxa.UUCP (Peter Wolfe) C optimizers (slight? FLAME) Sun, 26-Feb-84 01:19:36 EST
padpowell@wateng.UUCP (PAD Powell [Admin]) Re: C optimizers (slight? FLAME) Mon, 27-Feb-84 07:39:15 EST
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Re: enum, bit fields, cpp... Tue, 28-Feb-84 00:40:04 EST
dvk@mi-cec.UUCP (Dan Klein) C Neatener - a postscript Tue, 28-Feb-84 15:30:32 EST
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) the mythical NOSTRICT keyword Tue, 28-Feb-84 19:05:06 EST
jdb@mordor.UUCP Re: Precedence Question - (nf) Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:11:55 EST
mark@umcp-cs.UUCP Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9) Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:47:42 EST
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Re: enum, bit fields, cpp... Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:48:29 EST
arnold@gatech.UUCP cxref cross referencing program bug fix posted. Thu, 1-Mar-84 02:42:37 EST
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: enum, bit fields, cpp... Thu, 1-Mar-84 03:05:45 EST
jas@druxy.UUCP (ShanklandJA) Re: Precedence Question (again) Fri, 2-Mar-84 00:23:25 EST
reg@vaxine.UUCP (Rick Genter) What do *YOU* think of typedefs? (A long message) Fri, 2-Mar-84 00:23:57 EST
bet@ecsvax.UUCP Update on C compiler query for IBM S-370 under OS/MVS Fri, 2-Mar-84 05:33:44 EST
turner@ucbesvax.UUCP Re: enum, bit fields, cpp... Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:31:18 EST
ldl@genix.UUCP Re: Identifier significance CHALLENGE Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:39:24 EST
keashly@mprvaxa.UUCP (Lance Keashly) Help with portable C compiler porting Fri, 2-Mar-84 06:45:12 EST
crl@pur-phy.UUCP (Charles LaBrec) Re: Precedence Question - (nf) Fri, 2-Mar-84 07:45:11 EST
ldl@genix.UUCP Re: typedef in c Fri, 2-Mar-84 11:11:44 EST
dan@rna.UUCP String and constant #defines, Summation Sat, 3-Mar-84 09:20:45 EST
joe@teltone.UUCP (Joe) Assignment to pointers to functions returning void Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:36:27 EST
ee161acv@sdccs5.UUCP Dynamic structures in C Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:50:05 EST
sa@byucsa.UUCP Automated Standards: Query/Offer Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:24:46 EST
karn@allegra.UUCP (Phil Karn) Re: Assignment to pointers to functions returning void Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:46:16 EST
greg@sdcsvax.UUCP Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs? Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:46:55 EST
dvk@mi-cec.UUCP (Dan Klein) Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9) Sun, 4-Mar-84 00:54:46 EST
greg@sdcsvax.UUCP Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs? Sun, 4-Mar-84 02:01:48 EST
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) Re: Assignment to pointers to functions returning void Sun, 4-Mar-84 02:31:16 EST
ado@elsie.UUCP Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs Mon, 5-Mar-84 00:25:15 EST
rjk@mgweed.UUCP (Randy King) Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs Mon, 5-Mar-84 01:18:16 EST
wls@astrovax.UUCP Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9) Tue, 6-Mar-84 01:01:20 EST
alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll) Re: C "neatener" - another example (#9) Tue, 6-Mar-84 02:45:22 EST
msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow) Re: C optimization and debugging. Wed, 7-Mar-84 00:25:23 EST
baskett@decwrl.UUCP (Forest Baskett) Optimizing C and portable Bliss compilers Wed, 7-Mar-84 00:25:59 EST
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs Wed, 7-Mar-84 06:58:38 EST
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) New LINT gag wanted Wed, 7-Mar-84 08:27:24 EST
reg@vaxine.UUCP (Rick Genter) A followup to my typedefs article Thu, 8-Mar-84 00:11:17 EST
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) Re: Re: typedef in C Thu, 8-Mar-84 19:21:52 EST
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) Re: typedef in c (recursive structs) Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:46:29 EST
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) Re: C optimization and debugging. Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:47:49 EST
plw@mgweed.UUCP (Pete Wilson) pointer question Sat, 10-Mar-84 12:46:30 EST
johanw@ttds.UUCP (Johan Wide'n) Re: New LINT gag wanted Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:19:04 EST
keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) Re: New LINT gag wanted Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:21:21 EST
bet@ecsvax.UUCP Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MVS request Sat, 10-Mar-84 13:37:40 EST
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: RISC perspective Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:19:15 EST
chris@eneevax.UUCP more on C optimization Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:23:46 EST
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: New LINT gag wanted Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:28:34 EST
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: A followup to my typedefs article Sat, 10-Mar-84 14:33:27 EST
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) inconsistency in C manual Sun, 11-Mar-84 00:24:05 EST
barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin) Re: pointer question Sun, 11-Mar-84 07:05:26 EST
hal@cornell.UUCP (Hal Perkins) Re: Improving C Mon, 12-Mar-84 05:40:21 EST
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) Is #define NULL 0L ok? Mon, 12-Mar-84 05:42:25 EST
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Mon, 12-Mar-84 07:23:46 EST
decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot) yacc %token value #defines Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:30:05 EST
decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot) lint bug: f((int) double expr) Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:30:26 EST
smoot@ut-sally.UUCP (Smoot Carl-Mitchell) Re: Improving C Tue, 13-Mar-84 08:46:13 EST
dave@qtlon.UUCP (Dave Lukes) Re: Wanted--better way to please lint and sccs Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:35:24 EST
bet@ecsvax.UUCP C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL? Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:40:51 EST
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) What Can't C Do? Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:41:56 EST
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Tue, 13-Mar-84 20:38:26 EST
minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin Minow) Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized" Tue, 13-Mar-84 20:38:57 EST
tjt@kobold.UUCP Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:08:27 EST
alan@allegra.UUCP (Alan S. Driscoll) (char *) NULL Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:39:06 EST
ark@rabbit.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) yet another null pointer idea Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:39:21 EST
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Re: What Can't C Do? Wed, 14-Mar-84 07:56:43 EST
tgg@hou5e.UUCP Re: RISC perspective Wed, 14-Mar-84 19:49:13 EST
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Wed, 14-Mar-84 20:37:28 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL? Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:27:24 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: What Can't C Do? Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:27:42 EST
msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow) Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Thu, 15-Mar-84 00:34:16 EST
paul@uiucuxc.UUCP Re: Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MV - (nf) Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:03:46 EST
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) C Bigotry Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:21:27 EST
wcs@homxa.UUCP (Bill Stewart HO 4K-437 x0705) Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized" Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:25:46 EST
ok@edai.UUCP (Richard O'Keefe) if sizeof (char*) == 4 then sizeof (int) MUST = 4 (K&R) Thu, 15-Mar-84 01:45:34 EST
guido@mcvax.UUCP (Guido van Rossum) Is mixing char and int types as parameters portable? Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:15:33 EST
stew@harvard.UUCP (Stew Rubenstein) Re: What Can't C Do? Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:18:42 EST
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) Re: RISC perspective -- register variables Thu, 15-Mar-84 07:24:55 EST
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Re: more on C optimization Fri, 16-Mar-84 00:28:16 EST
hamilton@uiucuxc.UUCP Re: pointer question - (nf) Fri, 16-Mar-84 00:36:15 EST
dcn@ihuxl.UUCP (Dave Newkirk) Language Independent Code Optimization? Fri, 16-Mar-84 02:05:11 EST
martillo@ihuxt.UUCP (Yehoyaqim Shemtob Martillo) Re: pointer question - (nf) Fri, 16-Mar-84 02:57:56 EST
hom@hocda.UUCP (H.MORRIS) Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Fri, 16-Mar-84 03:05:18 EST
johnl@haddock.UUCP Re: Orphaned Response - (nf) Fri, 16-Mar-84 07:44:58 EST
tjt@kobold.UUCP Re: if sizeof (char*) == 4 then sizeof (int) MUST = 4 (K&R) Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:37:29 EST
hans@log-hb.UUCP (Hans Albertsson) Re: pointer question Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:39:13 EST
smk@axiom.UUCP (Steven M. Kramer) Re: RISC perspective Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:39:45 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: What Can't C Do? Sat, 17-Mar-84 02:42:39 EST
usenet@abnjh.UUCP (usenet) Re: pointer question Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:43:48 EST
gurr@west44.UUCP (Dave Gurr) Re: C: is it just another descendant of ALGOL? Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:50:14 EST
tim@unc.UUCP Re: What Can't C Do? (struct & string compares) Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:54:43 EST
mcewan@uiucdcs.UUCP (mcewan ) Re: Precedence Question - (nf) Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:56:25 EST
mcewan@uiucdcs.UUCP (mcewan ) Re: What do *YOU* think of typedefs? (A - (nf) Sat, 17-Mar-84 03:56:40 EST
lwall@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Larry Wall) Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized" Sat, 17-Mar-84 04:02:15 EST
kendall@wjh12.UUCP (Sam Kendall) Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83 Sun, 18-Mar-84 01:37:36 EST
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) C Bigotry (Erratum) Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:22:28 EST
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83 Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:31:38 EST
ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Re: What Can't C Do? Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:36:35 EST
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: read(fd,&y,sizeof y) Mon, 19-Mar-84 07:16:51 EST
dmmartindale@watcgl.UUCP (Dave Martindale) Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized" Mon, 19-Mar-84 07:22:54 EST
ggr@hudson.UUCP (Guy Riddle) Re: register variables in C Mon, 19-Mar-84 08:07:42 EST
nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) Re: What Can't C Do? (strings) Tue, 20-Mar-84 00:38:21 EST
mnc@hou2g.UUCP (#M.CONDICT) Re: Orphaned Response - (nf) Tue, 20-Mar-84 00:47:08 EST
nathan@orstcs.UUCP Re: Followup on C compiler for IBM OS/MV Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:29:34 EST
keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) Re: inconsistency in C manual Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:35:00 EST
dyer@vaxuum.DEC (Where's the falafel?) To C or not to C... Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:36:02 EST
bet@ecsvax.UUCP C compiler for IBM OS/MVS -- final word Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:40:30 EST
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: Can ANSI Standard C be "Optimized" Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:41:12 EST
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: structure and array and string comparisons Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:41:31 EST
leiby@masscomp.UUCP Re: Improving C Tue, 20-Mar-84 01:42:36 EST
lfm@ukc.UUCP (L.Marshall) "void" for V7 Tue, 20-Mar-84 02:06:11 EST
guido@mcvax.UUCP (Guido van Rossum) Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary). Tue, 20-Mar-84 06:25:17 EST
tim@unc.UUCP (Tim Maroney) Re: structure and array and string comparisons Tue, 20-Mar-84 06:27:50 EST
hamilton@uiucuxc.UUCP Re: Re: What Can't C Do? (struct & strin - (nf) Wed, 21-Mar-84 00:47:18 EST
emjej@uokvax.UUCP Re: C: is it just another descendant of - (nf) Wed, 21-Mar-84 00:57:19 EST
phipps@fortune.UUCP (Clay Phipps) Explicit "Unknown" Arg Type / Re: Is #define NULL 0L ok? Wed, 21-Mar-84 01:07:33 EST
phil@unisoft.UUCP (Phil Ronzone) Re: What Can't C Do? Wed, 21-Mar-84 01:09:44 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: What Can't C Do? (strings) Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:23:57 EST
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) Re: What Can't C Do? Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:48:31 EST
chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Re: inconsistency in C manual Wed, 21-Mar-84 02:48:56 EST
bet@ecsvax.UUCP C language problems -- maybe we should leave it be? Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:27:26 EST
aaw@pyuxss.UUCP (Aaron Werman) Re: What Can't C Do? Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:33:58 EST
brt@pyuxvv.UUCP (B Reytblat) help! (rather long) Wed, 21-Mar-84 03:34:13 EST
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Re: Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary). Wed, 21-Mar-84 04:56:25 EST
cwc@uw-june (Winnie Chow) AT&T C/370 Thu, 22-Mar-84 00:46:37 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: structure and array and string comparisons Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:25:04 EST
rcd@opus.UUCP Re: structure and array and string comparisons Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:25:18 EST
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: Mixing char and int types as parameters in portable (summary). Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:28:38 EST
gnu@sun.uucp (John Gilmore) Re: help! (much shorter) Thu, 22-Mar-84 01:28:53 EST
budd@arizona.UUCP little quiz Thu, 22-Mar-84 02:29:09 EST
eric@wucs.UUCP Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83 Thu, 22-Mar-84 04:16:13 EST
eric@wucs.UUCP (Eric Kiebler) Re: What Can't C Do? (strings) Thu, 22-Mar-84 04:16:56 EST
waterloop@watmath.UUCP (waterloop) re: c compilers for the 370 Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:22:57 EST
scarton@inmet.UUCP Re: C compiler for IBM OS/MVS -- final w - (nf) Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:36:29 EST
tgg@hou5e.UUCP Re: little quiz Fri, 23-Mar-84 20:44:00 EST
hom@hocda.UUCP (H.MORRIS) Re: "sizeof(int) < sizeof(char *): a defense" Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:04:41 EST
neal@denelcor.UUCP (Neal Weidenhofer) Re: little quiz Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:40:30 EST
neal@denelcor.UUCP (Neal Weidenhofer) Re: structure and array and string comparisons Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:41:18 EST
jbf@ccieng5.UUCP (Jens Bernhard Fiederer) preprocessor question Fri, 23-Mar-84 21:41:53 EST