Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site hocse.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!pegasus!hocse!dls
From: dls@hocse.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.space,net.taxes
Subject: Re: SPACE STATION ALERT
Message-ID: <150@hocse.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Mar-84 09:15:06 EST
Article-I.D.: hocse.150
Posted: Wed Mar  7 09:15:06 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:37:05 EST
References: <2570@rabbit.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 18

Cute. 

Why don't you contribute some substantial
criticism of the space station as a probject. I'm
sure we'd all be interested and the net would be
more interesting as a result.

If we(space station advocates) can't convince a person
such as yourself that a space station
is 1)the essential next step in space
   2)extremely important to the human future
   3)likly to produce significant economic return
   4)well worth a billion a year for ten years

then maybe we shouldn't have one. But give
us a chance to make our case.

Dale.