Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!genrad!wjh12!n44a!ima!inmet!mazur From: mazur@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Net.abortion - (nf) Message-ID: <1026@inmet.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Mar-84 06:42:57 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.1026 Posted: Thu Mar 8 06:42:57 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Mar-84 07:19:17 EST Lines: 34 #R:decwrl:-604400:inmet:10900059:000:1459 inmet!mazur Mar 7 15:23:00 1984 > Can it be because you can't answer my question about what makes the fetus > different from the child that makes you want to stop the discussion? > How come we can go on at great lengths about every other topic, but suddenly > when someone who does not agree with YOU comes along YOU try to move them > out of sight. Talk about censorship and closed minds! > You can silence me anytime by answering my question so that it makes sense > to continue the debate. But you're looking bad now, especially after your > attempt to dictate (heil Sophie) free speech only for your side. Of course > I know that you would be a big reader of net.abortion, :-). He's kidding right??? If he is, forgive this. Who died and gave you the right to go against what the majority of people appeared to support? The point is, *many* people are sick and tired of the abortion debate, and don't want to read your views on the issue. Somebody, (not Sophie) posted a note saying he would create net.abortion if there wasn't any good reason not too. So *he* created it, and Sophie just wanted to make sure that everyone knew where to post their subsequent articles. If you don't have access to net.abortion, talk to your system administrator, 'cause the discussion is alive and well in that group. It is not censored, be serious. As far as looking bad, I think you're looking a lot worse right now than Sophie. Beth Mazur {ima,harpo,esquire}!inmet!mazur