Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!chris From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: Solution to "A C Puzzle" of 12/12/83 Message-ID: <5976@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Sat, 17-Mar-84 17:41:07 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.5976 Posted: Sat Mar 17 17:41:07 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Mar-84 08:31:38 EST References: <374@wjh12.UUCP> <430@wjh12.UUCP> Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept. Lines: 10 I'm quite possibly the one who said that there is no "p" for which "(p)[0]" and "*p" were different, and you're right, pointer to function makes the former illegal. I just tried giving it to the 4.1BSD C compiler and it produces a "compiler error" no less! I wonder if the System V PCC has the same bug (I consider it a bug when your compiler announces an internal error for bad input). -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci UUCP: {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris CSNet: chris@umcp-cs ARPA: chris.umcp-cs@CSNet-Relay