Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site erix.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!mcvax!enea!erix!per From: per@erix.UUCP (Per Hedeland) Newsgroups: net.followup,eunet.followup Subject: Re: Private Opinions: an Inquiry Message-ID: <293@erix.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 04:16:26 EST Article-I.D.: erix.293 Posted: Wed Feb 29 04:16:26 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 1-Mar-84 05:21:00 EST References: <209@haring.UUCP> <1014@cbosgd.UUCP> <5712@mcvax.UUCP> Organization: L M Ericsson, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 10 <> There is a related point, though: An employee might due to his work have access to e g classified information, which to a great extent influences his "personal" opininions. In this case, while he can freely express those opinions, he is prevented from fully motivating them. (Perhaps that means that it would be best not to even express them?) Per Hedeland ..{decvax, philabs}!mcvax!enea!erix!per or per@erix.UUCP