Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site hocse.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!pegasus!hocse!dls From: dls@hocse.UUCP Newsgroups: net.space,net.taxes Subject: Re: SPACE STATION ALERT Message-ID: <150@hocse.UUCP> Date: Wed, 7-Mar-84 09:15:06 EST Article-I.D.: hocse.150 Posted: Wed Mar 7 09:15:06 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Mar-84 08:37:05 EST References: <2570@rabbit.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 18 Cute. Why don't you contribute some substantial criticism of the space station as a probject. I'm sure we'd all be interested and the net would be more interesting as a result. If we(space station advocates) can't convince a person such as yourself that a space station is 1)the essential next step in space 2)extremely important to the human future 3)likly to produce significant economic return 4)well worth a billion a year for ten years then maybe we shouldn't have one. But give us a chance to make our case. Dale.