Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers
From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver (laser-lovers)
Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers
Subject: id AA18734; Fri, 2 Mar 84 07:16:48 pst
Message-ID: <865@uw-beaver>
Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 13:15:19 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.865
Posted: Fri Mar  2 13:15:19 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Mar-84 06:49:07 EST
Sender: root@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 21

From decwrl!baskett@Shasta Fri Mar  2 10:15:13 1984
Date: 2 Mar 1984 0716-PST (Friday)
From: Forest Baskett 
Subject: Re: LN01 vs. Xerox 2700
Message-Id: <8403021516.AA29109@ACETES>
Received: by ACETES (3.327/4.04) 2 Mar 84 07:16:03 PST (Fri)
To: William LeFebvre 
Cc: texhax@su-score, laser-lovers@washington
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri,  2 Mar 84 00:07:17 CST.
             <322.phil.Dione@Rice>
ReSent-date: Fri 2 Mar 84 10:11:37-PST
ReSent-from: Richard Furuta 
ReSent-to: "Laser Lovers": ;

As far as I can tell, the DEC LN01 is very similar to the Xerox 2700.
The electronics are the same, as you can quickly tell by just looking
inside.  There are some 8086 code changes in the LN01 aimed at adding
some new features but I don't think they affect font file formats and
other limitations of the 2700.

Forest