Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekecs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw
From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: If I can't see it, it's not there (clarification)
Message-ID: <3544@tekecs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 01:44:09 EST
Article-I.D.: tekecs.3544
Posted: Fri Mar  2 01:44:09 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Feb-84 01:12:57 EST
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 10

I think you people are taking me a bit too literally. What I meant was
that one should be wary of believing in such subtle influences
precisely because they are so hard to prove and because that belief
tends toward paranoia. I didn't mean to say that they absolutely do
not exist. And of course, I didn't mean "see" to be something you do
just with your eyes (or any of your senses). I would say that the title of
this article was the *least* important of the statements in my earlier article.

                                                  the misunderstood,
                                                       Jeff Winslow