Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!wjh12!n44a!ima!inmet!grw From: grw@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: id AA18424; Mon, 20 Feb 84 12:08:28 - (nf) Message-ID: <932@inmet.UUCP> Date: Fri, 24-Feb-84 05:46:38 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.932 Posted: Fri Feb 24 05:46:38 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Feb-84 15:45:45 EST Lines: 22 #R:decwrl:-571000:inmet:2700056:000:987 inmet!grw Feb 23 11:41:00 1984 Having used Omnis and Horizons on several occasions I can only say that I have never seen a car that deteriorates faster (we're talking falling apart in front of your eyes) then the Chrysler twins. Lee sure missed a chance to junk those two cars when remaking the 'new' Chrysler Corp a few years back. It amazes me how Chrysler was able to steal a design from VW and Ford, use (at least in the first few years) a VW engine and transmission, and still wind up with a lousy car. The Rabbit and the Fiesta were and still are much superior to the Omin/Horizon. Past experience with Chrysler cars indicates that after ~1967 the company made about 1 good auto - the Dart/Valiant - and then replaced that one success story with the Volare/Aspen loosers. I've used a 74 Plymouth wagon for a while and a 73 Plymouth Fury III both of which were LOUSY LOUSY LOUSY!!! -- Gary Wasserman ...harpo!inmet!grw ...hplabs!sri-unix!cca!ima!inmet!grw ...yale-comix!ima!inmet!grw