Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ucbvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!grkermit!mit-vax!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hogpc!houca!orion!hou5f!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!ucbcad!ucbvax!mo From: mo@ucbvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd Subject: Re: Networking Lossage in 4.1c Design Message-ID: <37@ucbvax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 1-Jul-83 14:52:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.37 Posted: Fri Jul 1 14:52:00 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 3-Jul-83 01:24:19 EDT References: <1620@allegra.UUCP> Organization: U. C. Berkeley Computer Science Lines: 6 The the problem with rebinding addresses is a non-problem. There is an option which is supplied to the socket() call to allow addresss rebinding exactly compliant with the semantics of TCP. This is an option because not all protocols in the universe take TCP's view of connection management. -Mike O'Dell