Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ucbvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!grkermit!mit-vax!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!hogpc!houca!orion!hou5f!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!ucbcad!ucbvax!mo
From: mo@ucbvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: Networking Lossage in 4.1c Design
Message-ID: <37@ucbvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Jul-83 14:52:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.37
Posted: Fri Jul  1 14:52:00 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Jul-83 01:24:19 EDT
References: <1620@allegra.UUCP>
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Computer Science
Lines: 6

The the problem with rebinding addresses is a non-problem.  There is
an option which is supplied to the socket() call to allow addresss
rebinding exactly compliant with the semantics of TCP.  This is an
option because not all protocols in the universe take TCP's view
of connection management.
	-Mike O'Dell