Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-kirk!mark
From: mark@hp-kirk.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Smoking Harms Non-Smokers -> Evidenc - (nf)
Message-ID: <1244@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 03:24:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1244
Posted: Thu Jun 30 03:24:48 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 10:03:58 EDT
Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR
Lines: 17

#R:ut-ngp:-35600:hp-kirk:7100004:000:819
hp-kirk!mark    Jun 23 07:26:00 1983

While I am inclined to suspect that secondary smoke is a health hazard, my
requirements for proof are somewhat more stringent than merely accepting the
"findinga" of three "experts".  No matter what your claim from the existance
of UFOs, to the hazards of nuclear waste, to the safety of 55mph, to the
problems with secondary smoke, (ad-infinitum), you are unlikely to have any
difficulty finding a fair number of doctors, lawyers, engineers, clergy, or
other so-called experts who support your position and have findings, surveys,
studies, evidence, or other supportive material to back them up.

                                        unimpressed,
                                        Death Rowe
                                        hp-pcd!hp-cvd!mark
                                        Corvallis, Oregon