Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou5e.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5e!ijk
From: ijk@hou5e.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sport
Subject: Brett Conduct
Message-ID: <688@hou5e.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 1-Aug-83 16:13:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou5e.688
Posted: Mon Aug  1 16:13:10 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Aug-83 03:17:58 EDT
Organization: American Bell ED&D, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 13

In general, I don't have too much to say on the specific allowance
of the use of the bat.  Waht really irks me is that in my opinion
Brett should have been heavily fined/ censured for his behaviour
in charging the ump (from the videotape, it looked like he would have
literally beated the ump if he hadn't been restrained.  Technically, his
actions constiture assault on the ump, and battery on the guys who
retrained him.  But was any action taken????????????   NO!!@#%^&

And furthermore, none of the sportcasters even commented upon this issue!
Why not?  Didn't anyone else find that reprehensible???

Ihor Kinal
hou5e!ijk