Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxw.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxh!mhuxr!mhuxv!mhuxm!mhuxa!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxw!rung From: rung@ihuxw.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Reagan"s Press Conference Message-ID: <406@ihuxw.UUCP> Date: Fri, 8-Jul-83 09:41:55 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxw.406 Posted: Fri Jul 8 09:41:55 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Jul-83 12:06:59 EDT References: cvl.452, <268@isrnix.UUCP> Organization: BTL Naperville, Il. Lines: 33 Tim Sevener seems to object to the Reagan Presidency being that of a pro-business nature. He seems to have forgotten that if business does not profitably flourish in this country, the country itself gets into economic trouble. The Reagan administration has the support of business behind it today because this administration, from a business view, has done what it said it would do when they were all back on the campaign trail 3 and 4 years ago. President Reagan's ability to _c_o_m_m_u_n_i_c_a_t_e with Congress should be considered as an example for future administrations. It's been 20 years since this quality of communication has taken place between Congress and the Executive Branch regardless of partisanship! Mr. Sevener seems to suggest that the citizens view is not the same as that of business' view: "So it is no surprise when Congress votes for corporate interests! It takes major struggles on the part of citizens to get Congress to vote against corporate interests." Mr. Sevener should remember that 95% of income earning people in this country work for a business of some sort and that if the company he works for doesn't flourish (corporations are allowed to make a profit you know, otherwise they wouldn't need you), he might not be very excited around salary review time, regardless of the good quality producer he probably is for his company. Pete Rung BTL, Naperville, Ill. #