Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!we13!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!joe From: joe@zinfandel.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: A Response to the Straw Man Argument - (nf) Message-ID: <1122@zehntel.UUCP> Date: Sun, 17-Jul-83 01:19:58 EDT Article-I.D.: zehntel.1122 Posted: Sun Jul 17 01:19:58 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 19-Jul-83 20:00:05 EDT Lines: 9 #R:trw-unix:-35800:zinfandel:17200007:000:425 zinfandel!joe Jul 16 09:12:00 1983 I just think that there is something imbalanced in granting rights to any "subset" of an individual that aren't wholey subserviant to the individual, regardless of what might otherwise happen. The woman is the only individual there by definition of the word, in that NO subset of her body can exist alone. Any attempts to individuate any part of her logically must be accompanied by the right to individuate it physically.