Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site machaids.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!hocda!machaids!brf From: brf@machaids.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: CHOICE and the Senate Message-ID: <393@machaids.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 17:03:29 EDT Article-I.D.: machaids.393 Posted: Thu Jun 30 17:03:29 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 21:17:50 EDT Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel Lines: 24 Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics Subject: Re: CHOICE and the Senate References: <192@ihnp1.UUCP> Subtitle: We Ride the Slippery Slope Again! Seriously, you raise valid moral questions, but unfortunately they have nothing to do with the recent Senate debate. The real question should be: Is this an issue to be settled by the U. S. Senate? I don't think there is any valid argument for the Government to be interfering in the private decisions of women. An anti-abortion amendment would make Probition look like kids play. Why make potential outlaws out of 51% of the population? Bruce Fowler {houx*}!machaids!brf Bell Telephone Laboratories, Room HO 2B-319 Crawfords Corner Rd., Holmdel, N.J. 07733 Work Phone: (201)949-3677 or 8-233-3677