Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site uw-june
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!uw-june!eli
From: eli@uw-june (Eli Messinger)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Jaws 3-D:  A Warning
Message-ID: <510@uw-june>
Date: Sat, 23-Jul-83 20:23:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: uw-june.510
Posted: Sat Jul 23 20:23:51 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Jul-83 07:05:40 EDT
Organization: U. Washington, Computer Sci
Lines: 34

I wandered into a screening of this film at one of our local muliti-
screen theaters (after having seen Psycho II), and found a pair of
genuine-cardboard framed 3-D glasses underneath the seat.

All in all I'd say I got my money's worth (a no-dollar investment),
and wasted approximately two hours of time.  Jaws 3-D smelled up the
movie theater like the warmed over "three-quel" that it is.

To say that Jaws-3D is loosely based on a >title< by Peter Benchely (sp?)
might be giving the new writers more credit than they deserve.  The film
crawls along with the pace and excitement of a rock under water, and man-
ages almost that amount of drama and tension.  The few "action" sequences
(read that: simulated shark gorings) are about as stimulating as used dental
floss.

Of course everyone who goes to see it does so for the not-so-fabulous
3-D effects.  Unfortunately this didn't sustain my interest for more than
four or five minutes.  Not that the 3-D is bad... it's certainly compar-
able to Friday the 13th Part 3 (hey, why not "Rocky 3-D?")... it's just
that it's not used for much of anything.

Even the fake great-white shark from Jaws seems to have gotten a fairly
poor looking stand-in for the close-ups.

About the only thing this film has going for it (besides the ending,
when it's over and you can leave the theater) are some very poorly
matted underwater scenes that could induce laughter in anyone who is
still paying attention.

I'm glad I knew better than to go to the theater to intentionally see
this film.  You should too.


	... uw-beaver!eli