Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ucbcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!ucbcad!ucbesvax.turner From: ucbesvax.turner@ucbcad.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: war in the americas - (nf) Message-ID: <105@ucbcad.UUCP> Date: Wed, 27-Jul-83 23:18:09 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbcad.105 Posted: Wed Jul 27 23:18:09 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 28-Jul-83 21:16:52 EDT Sender: notes@ucbcad.UUCP Organization: UC Berkeley, CAD Group Lines: 25 #R:teklabs:-222400:ucbesvax:7500022:000:984 ucbesvax!turner Jul 21 21:40:00 1983 Offhand, I would say the answer is "no". I tried to prompt discussion along these lines. Maybe I just intimidated people. Henry the K is a good choice. It is quite clear just why he was chosen: as he said himself, if the administration can't keep the secret war a secret, it should be in the open. Kissinger should know about keeping war a secret. He was the architect of the secret bombing of Cambodia ("the Nixon doctrine in its purest form"), which proceeded at a rate of about a Hiroshima per week for several months. Ah, those were the days! Kissinger runs a good show, side or otherwise. Now that the executive limitations on war-waging have a judicial shadow cast over them (which also seems to have gone unremarked in these pages), the U.S. can use his unique brand of internecine slime. Walk softly, Henry, but carry big honkin' cluster bombs. That'll get 'em to the negotiating table by 1990. Peace with Honor, yeah. Michael Turner ucbvax!ucbesvax.turner