Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-kirk!mark From: mark@hp-kirk.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Smoking Harms Non-Smokers -> Evidenc - (nf) Message-ID: <1244@hp-pcd.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 03:24:48 EDT Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1244 Posted: Thu Jun 30 03:24:48 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 10:03:58 EDT Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR Lines: 17 #R:ut-ngp:-35600:hp-kirk:7100004:000:819 hp-kirk!mark Jun 23 07:26:00 1983 While I am inclined to suspect that secondary smoke is a health hazard, my requirements for proof are somewhat more stringent than merely accepting the "findinga" of three "experts". No matter what your claim from the existance of UFOs, to the hazards of nuclear waste, to the safety of 55mph, to the problems with secondary smoke, (ad-infinitum), you are unlikely to have any difficulty finding a fair number of doctors, lawyers, engineers, clergy, or other so-called experts who support your position and have findings, surveys, studies, evidence, or other supportive material to back them up. unimpressed, Death Rowe hp-pcd!hp-cvd!mark Corvallis, Oregon