Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!ucbcad!ucbmonet.arnold From: ucbmonet.arnold@ucbcad.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Rainbows and discussions - (nf) Message-ID: <160@ucbcad.UUCP> Date: Sun, 26-Jun-83 22:44:14 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbcad.160 Posted: Sun Jun 26 22:44:14 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 28-Jun-83 08:53:36 EDT Lines: 12 #R:orstcs:14800002:ucbmonet:22400017:000:498 ucbmonet!arnold Jun 23 16:29:00 1983 I would disagree that the Bible is creationistic. I would agree it could be intrepreted that way. If, however, you insist that it can only be read in a creationistic fashion, you deny the intelligence of many thinking Christians who are not creationists. Ken P.S. I do not mean to imply by this that anyone who does interpret it this way is not intelligent. I'm sure there are intelligent creationists. I'm not sure I would use the epithet "thinking", but that is another argument entirely.