Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 7/1/83; site rlgvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!oz
From: oz@rlgvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Sickening, sickening, sickening...
Message-ID: <782@rlgvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Jul-83 09:34:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: rlgvax.782
Posted: Wed Jul  6 09:34:59 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 7-Jul-83 20:52:49 EDT
References: aplvax.151 <5492@unc.UUCP>
Organization: CCI, Capitol Operations Office
Lines: 13

Again we are besieged with people that are so narrow-minded that all they
can see is the misspelling in articles, rather then the point of the ariticle.
Agreed that even *I* wouldn't spell "sickening," "sickning" and it IS  poor
spelling, but the issue here is the point that the "person" made in their
article, NOT the misspelling of the word "sickening" in the original article.
A discussion of the merits of proper spelling and grammer has (and I'm sure
will continue to be) discussed here in net.flame, but lets stick to one issue
at a time per subject, ok.

				I corrected "sickening" for you above,

				OZ
				seismo!rlgvax!oz