Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site vax135.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!martin
From: martin@vax135.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: 4.1c subgroup? and a question
Message-ID: <497@vax135.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Jun-83 19:18:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax135.497
Posted: Wed Jun 29 19:18:29 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jun-83 02:17:13 EDT
References: <468@mhb5b.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 16

the group for 4.1c shoudl take into account the future 4.2, so
lets go with 'net.bugs.42bsd'.

i know it does not sound correct, but i would think that 4.2bsd
goes in the same sub group area as 2bsd 4bsd and usg. it's sad
that this is net.bugs but there is not a 'net.working.today group'.

this keeps the current structure correct.

while we are on tthe subject, does anone understand the 'real'
memory allocation at boot time in 4.1c?, i have a 1Mbyte 750 and
i'm getting 1/2 of it taken away from me for system usage. i want
to get some of that back, as the system runs very slowly.

martin levy.