Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ukc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ukc!mjb From: mjb@ukc.UUCP (M.J.Bayliss) Newsgroups: net.wanted Subject: Re: rmcobol for vax Message-ID: <3885@ukc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 25-Jul-83 10:45:24 EDT Article-I.D.: ukc.3885 Posted: Mon Jul 25 10:45:24 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 26-Jul-83 07:20:59 EDT References: <127@linus.UUCP> Organization: Computing Lab. Kent University, England Lines: 16 rmcobol is ryan-macfarlane cobol, and nothing to do with removing cobol from a system. fairly obvious really - all the adverts call it "rmcobol". so why, when we are trying to justify expensive connections to the U.S. and time and manpower in the UK to build up a network, are the only replies that we see, poking fun at serious requests? europe stopped getting some news groups because of the garbage in them, the uk is liable to follow the same course because we can't afford it. why not go away and read the etiquette articles? and look through the articles that have appeared in net.news recently about using the net and links to europe. mike bayliss University of Kent at Canterbury, UK ...!{vax135,mcvax}!ukc!mjb