Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cornell.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!cornell!ddw From: ddw@cornell.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Subdividing net.religion Message-ID: <4727@cornell.UUCP> Date: Tue, 28-Jun-83 12:58:57 EDT Article-I.D.: cornell.4727 Posted: Tue Jun 28 12:58:57 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 29-Jun-83 20:16:40 EDT Sender: ddw@cornell.UUCP Organization: Cornell Computer Science Lines: 26 From: ddw (David Wright) To: net-religion I'm opposed to the subdivision, simply because I don't think it's all that practical. Now, I suppose we could divide into net.religion.Xity, net.religion.totemism and so on just to keep the topics separate, but as far as trying to keep the arguments out of the subgroup, this just ain't gonna happen! If these religions were all one big happy family, there wouldn't be schisms and factionalism and the IRA and who knows what all else. Now, I grant you that some submitters to the net are simply asking for doctrinal information (e.g. "What do Mormons believe?") and this sort of thing can be answered non-controversially as long as the responder doesn't get too detailed or the question isn't too broad (e.g. "What do Christians believe?"), but it's the details that'll get you every time. Anyway, who wants to miss all the arguments? And if we subdivide, what about cross-doctrinal arguments? It's messy the way it is, but it isn't broken badly enough to need fixing. If you can't take the flames, stay out of the fireplace. David Wright {vax135|decvax|purdue}!cornell!ddw ddw@cornell