Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!Axler.UPenn@UDel-Relay From: Axler.UPenn@UDel-Relay@sri-unix.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Usenet/SFL interaction Message-ID: <3476@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 26-Jul-83 12:02:00 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.3476 Posted: Tue Jul 26 12:02:00 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jul-83 22:38:02 EDT Lines: 12 From: David AxlerIn general, I agree with Lauren Weinstein as to assigning a high value to interaction twixt ourselves and Usenet. However, I agree fully with one problem raised by an earlier commentator: Usenet messages tend to come with their 'answers', which in turn tends to inhibit further commentary. Perhaps there's a way around this, though it'll almost certainly mean more work for the sfl administrator, such as separating initial messages from responses and entering them in two successive sfl issues. Dave Axler (Axler.UPenn@UDel-Relay)