Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxw.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxh!mhuxr!mhuxv!mhuxm!mhuxa!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxw!rung
From: rung@ihuxw.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Reagan"s Press Conference
Message-ID: <406@ihuxw.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Jul-83 09:41:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxw.406
Posted: Fri Jul  8 09:41:55 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Jul-83 12:06:59 EDT
References: cvl.452, <268@isrnix.UUCP>
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 33


Tim Sevener seems to object to the Reagan Presidency being that
of a pro-business nature.  He seems to have forgotten that if
business does not profitably flourish in this country, the
country itself gets into economic trouble.  The Reagan
administration has the support of business behind it today
because this administration, from a business view, has done
what it said it would do when they were all back on the
campaign trail 3 and 4 years ago.  President Reagan's ability
to _c_o_m_m_u_n_i_c_a_t_e with Congress should be considered as an example
for future administrations.  It's been 20 years since this
quality of communication has taken place between Congress and
the Executive Branch regardless of partisanship!

Mr. Sevener seems to suggest that the citizens view is not
the same as that of business' view:

"So it is no surprise when Congress votes for corporate interests!
It takes major struggles on the part of citizens to get Congress
to vote against corporate interests."

Mr. Sevener should remember that 95% of income earning people in
this country work for a business of some sort and that if the
company he works for doesn't flourish (corporations are allowed
to make a profit you know, otherwise they wouldn't need you),
he might not be very excited around salary review time,
regardless of the good quality producer he probably is for his
company.


			Pete Rung
			BTL, Naperville, Ill.
			
#