Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!decwrl!flairvax!ellis From: ellis@flairvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.music Message-ID: <142@flairvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 01:07:41 EDT Article-I.D.: flairvax.142 Posted: Thu Jun 30 01:07:41 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jun-83 15:30:01 EDT References: rabbit.1642 Lines: 27 Regarding a recent suggestion to split net.music into classical and popular -- there don't seem to have been many articles at all about classical music. The most frequent mention to classical lately is in net.audio, usually about hi-tech issues of stuff like Wellington's Victory and the 1812 Overture. Perhaps a better split would be between commercial/mass oriented music that's "really climbing the charts this week" and, well, just music. We could call them 'net.music.$$$' vs. 'net.music.???'. The $$$ group would be used for articles about Human League, Men at Work, Barry Manilow, Hooked on XXX, DISCOfied jazz, top forty anything, and other stuff you can play at parties**. The ??? group would receive articles ranging from anonymous 9th century composers to aging blues singers, and would encompass such topics as Surgical Penis Clinic, Tennstedt's latest Mahler release, Cabaret Voltaire, John Coltrane, Millions of Dead Cops... you know, stuff that empties out a room in 5 seconds flat leaving you in blissful solitude. Well, it's just another idea. Michael Ellis - Fairchild AI Lab - Palo Alto CA - (415) 858-4270 ** (not MY parties)