Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!edhall@rand-unix
From: edhall@rand-unix@sri-unix.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re:  Re:  Ram disks
Message-ID: <3796@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Aug-83 21:46:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.3796
Posted: Wed Aug  3 21:46:00 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Aug-83 04:00:31 EDT
Lines: 28


						      You probably do
    not want them to extend virtual memory (paging/swapping).  We do get
    close to the same performance (I think) by utilizing paging/swapping
    area on disks that are isolated from the rest of our system I/O.
    Most of the 11/70's swap on RK05's that have their own controller (the
    additional drives on this controller are seldom used).

Whoa!!  I thought that swapping is best done on your FASTEST disks.
An RK05 is SLOW, no matter whether it is exclusively used for swapping
or not.

I once experimented with this on a PDP-11/45 running V7 by moving
swapping from an AMPEX-980 (with a one-of-a-kind controller) to an
RK05.  Even though the AMPEX supported all filesystems as well as
usually serving as swap, moving swap off to the RK05 slowed things
down considerably; I immediately received a barrage of complaints as
to how the already slow system had gotten much slower.

Admittedly, an 11/70 with large memory is not going to be swapping
as much as this 11/45 was.  But speeding up the swapping process can
be quite significant on a system that needs to swap.  And on a paging
system, disk I/O speed can be even more important.  How a `ram disk'
is best used depends upon the system and what it is used for.

		-Ed Hall
		edhall@rand-unix
		{ucbvax,decvax}!trw-unix!randvax!edhall