Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!pur-ee!nwuxd!jab@berkeley
From: jab%berkeley@nwuxd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: UNIX continues!
Message-ID: <2923@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Jul-83 21:37:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.2923
Posted: Fri Jul  8 21:37:13 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Jul-83 03:06:25 EDT
Lines: 13

>From what I remember reading (QUITE a while back), HALTing the CPU isn't
a really great idea.

On the pdp11's, the UNIBUS behaves differently when the CPU is halted. More
specifically, NPR requests fail, and so (older) disks can do unpredictable
things if a transfer is occurring when the CPU is halted. (Really, decvax!aps
is one of the people who come to mind on this. Armando?)

As I said, it's been a while since I've looked at the material on this, but
you are VERY, VERY wrong in the statement that "a partial sync() is better
than no sync() at all."

	Jeff BOwles