Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site burl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!we13!otuxa!ll1!sb1!burl!lda
From: lda@burl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: The burl controversy
Message-ID: <216@burl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 20:10:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: burl.216
Posted: Thu Jun 30 20:10:03 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 22:17:06 EDT
References: <1202@tektronix.UUCP>
Organization: Western Electric, Burlington, NC
Lines: 7

I have corrected my error in sending mail to sites who do not have a
return path. Martin Levy specifically stated in his README that mail
was *not* to be sent to sites without return paths.  I used a
program to generate my routing file which was *supposed* to insure
two way paths.  I have verified (manually) all the paths now myself.
I will not allow that sort of thing to happen again. My apologies
for the inconvenience.