Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site vax135.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!martin From: martin@vax135.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: 4.1c subgroup? and a question Message-ID: <497@vax135.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Jun-83 19:18:29 EDT Article-I.D.: vax135.497 Posted: Wed Jun 29 19:18:29 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jun-83 02:17:13 EDT References: <468@mhb5b.UUCP> Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ Lines: 16 the group for 4.1c shoudl take into account the future 4.2, so lets go with 'net.bugs.42bsd'. i know it does not sound correct, but i would think that 4.2bsd goes in the same sub group area as 2bsd 4bsd and usg. it's sad that this is net.bugs but there is not a 'net.working.today group'. this keeps the current structure correct. while we are on tthe subject, does anone understand the 'real' memory allocation at boot time in 4.1c?, i have a 1Mbyte 750 and i'm getting 1/2 of it taken away from me for system usage. i want to get some of that back, as the system runs very slowly. martin levy.