Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site burl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!we13!otuxa!ll1!sb1!burl!lda From: lda@burl.UUCP Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Re: The burl controversy Message-ID: <216@burl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 20:10:03 EDT Article-I.D.: burl.216 Posted: Thu Jun 30 20:10:03 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 22:17:06 EDT References: <1202@tektronix.UUCP> Organization: Western Electric, Burlington, NC Lines: 7 I have corrected my error in sending mail to sites who do not have a return path. Martin Levy specifically stated in his README that mail was *not* to be sent to sites without return paths. I used a program to generate my routing file which was *supposed* to insure two way paths. I have verified (manually) all the paths now myself. I will not allow that sort of thing to happen again. My apologies for the inconvenience.