Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site machaids.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!hocda!machaids!brf
From: brf@machaids.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: CHOICE and the Senate
Message-ID: <393@machaids.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-Jun-83 17:03:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: machaids.393
Posted: Thu Jun 30 17:03:29 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jul-83 21:17:50 EDT
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel
Lines: 24

Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics
Subject: Re: CHOICE and the Senate
References: <192@ihnp1.UUCP>

Subtitle: We Ride the Slippery Slope Again!

Seriously, you raise valid moral questions, but unfortunately
they have nothing to do with the recent Senate debate.
The real question should be:

    Is this an issue to be settled by the U. S. Senate?

I don't think there is any valid argument for the Government
to be interfering in the private decisions of women.
An anti-abortion amendment would make Probition look like
kids play.  Why make potential outlaws out of 51% of the population?

    Bruce Fowler     {houx*}!machaids!brf

    Bell Telephone Laboratories, Room HO 2B-319
    Crawfords Corner Rd., Holmdel, N.J.  07733
    Work Phone: (201)949-3677 or 8-233-3677