Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 7/1/83; site rlgvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!oz From: oz@rlgvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Sickening, sickening, sickening... Message-ID: <782@rlgvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Jul-83 09:34:59 EDT Article-I.D.: rlgvax.782 Posted: Wed Jul 6 09:34:59 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Jul-83 20:52:49 EDT References: aplvax.151 <5492@unc.UUCP> Organization: CCI, Capitol Operations Office Lines: 13 Again we are besieged with people that are so narrow-minded that all they can see is the misspelling in articles, rather then the point of the ariticle. Agreed that even *I* wouldn't spell "sickening," "sickning" and it IS poor spelling, but the issue here is the point that the "person" made in their article, NOT the misspelling of the word "sickening" in the original article. A discussion of the merits of proper spelling and grammer has (and I'm sure will continue to be) discussed here in net.flame, but lets stick to one issue at a time per subject, ok. I corrected "sickening" for you above, OZ seismo!rlgvax!oz