Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830713); site mcvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!mcvax!jaap
From: jaap@mcvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Broff and a proposed net project
Message-ID: <5276@mcvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Jul-83 01:12:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: mcvax.5276
Posted: Tue Jul 19 01:12:50 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Jul-83 10:41:52 EDT
References: <3123@arizona.UUCP>
Organization: Math.Centre, Amsterdam
Lines: 27

Of course it is nice to do a project and communicating about it on the net.
It is one of the reason why the unix network exist.

I don't consider a rewrite of *roff to be a serious project. (BROFF: a
Burlesque Rewrite Off a Famous Formatter?).

First, my boss doesn't pay me do have hobbies like this.

Second, it is a bad idea to make a look alike with more or less the same input
requirements. (By the way, it will take a 2 seconds edit job to change to
change \n in \# and a little sed script for tbl, eqn, ideal and pic to let
them know about it.)
What is really needed is a new approach with new concepts for text processing.
I don't think that a text processing in a programming language flavour is a
solution. This will be just a tool made by programmers for programmers.
It would certainly not help our typist pool.
To have things done more interactively would be a better idea.

By the way, if you are continueing this project, keep the hyphenation algorithm
as clean as it is now. It's now trivial to put a different algorithm in, f.i.
for Dutch.

Final remark:
	\*(OQ doen't address the character OQ but a by .ds OQ defined macro.

	Jaap "Not wanting to recode years 60's software in the 80's" Akkerhuis.
	{philabs,mcvax}!jaap.