Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!we13!ihnp4!zehntel!zinfandel!joe
From: joe@zinfandel.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: A Response to the Straw Man Argument - (nf)
Message-ID: <1122@zehntel.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Jul-83 01:19:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: zehntel.1122
Posted: Sun Jul 17 01:19:58 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Jul-83 20:00:05 EDT
Lines: 9

#R:trw-unix:-35800:zinfandel:17200007:000:425
zinfandel!joe    Jul 16 09:12:00 1983

I just think that there is something imbalanced in granting rights to
any "subset" of an individual that aren't wholey subserviant to the
individual, regardless of what might otherwise happen. The woman is
the only individual there by definition of the word, in that NO subset of her
body can exist alone. Any attempts to individuate any part of her logically
 must be accompanied by the right to individuate it physically.