Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!ucbcad!ucbmonet.arnold
From: ucbmonet.arnold@ucbcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Rainbows and discussions - (nf)
Message-ID: <160@ucbcad.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 26-Jun-83 22:44:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbcad.160
Posted: Sun Jun 26 22:44:14 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 28-Jun-83 08:53:36 EDT
Lines: 12

#R:orstcs:14800002:ucbmonet:22400017:000:498
ucbmonet!arnold    Jun 23 16:29:00 1983

I would disagree that the Bible is creationistic.  I would agree it
could be intrepreted that way.  If, however, you insist that it can
only be read in a creationistic fashion, you deny the intelligence of
many thinking Christians who are not creationists.
		Ken
P.S.  I do not mean to imply by this that anyone who does interpret it
this way is not intelligent.  I'm sure there are intelligent
creationists.  I'm not sure I would use the epithet "thinking", but
that is another argument entirely.