From: utzoo!decvax!duke!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!orion!lime!we13!plw Newsgroups: net.misc Title: Re: Religous Matters Article-I.D.: we13.369 Posted: Thu Jan 20 09:30:42 1983 Received: Sun Jan 23 05:43:24 1983 References: ucbvax.629 Read "Refutation of the Ontological Proof of the Existance of God" by Kant (I think, it's been awhile since Intro to Philosophy). Proof by definition is a tautology - a=b doesn't prove that either a or b exist, it just establishes a relationship. Their are better proofs for the existance of God than St. Anselm's, and I think that all have been refuted as having some logical or philosophical flaw.