From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxp!reza Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Title: Summary of responses to the Cannon quality query Article-I.D.: ihuxp.359 Posted: Fri Feb 4 14:39:47 1983 Received: Sat Feb 5 04:52:48 1983 Reply-To: reza@ihuxp.UUCP (H. Reza Taheri) Thanks to all the people who responded to my article. There is nothing to summarize since everyone who took the time to answer (on the net or through mail) had the same thing to say: The dealer wanted me to buy a Nikon instead of the Cannon not because of the difference in quality but either because he got a bigger commission from Nikon or for some reason he wanted to keep his supply of Connons. Many people who have used a Cannon A-1 sent mail in defense of its quality. Everybody agrees that there is not much of a difference in quality between the two brands, if any. The bit about the commission makes sense. Cannon probably spends its money on advertisement rather than giving commission to dealers. H. Reza Taheri ...!ihnp4!ihuxp!reza (312)-979-1040