From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!npoiv!npois!houxm!houxa!houxi!houxz!ihnp4!ihnss!warren
Newsgroups: net.news
Title: Re: Re net.emacs
Article-I.D.: ihnss.1310
Posted: Tue Jan 11 12:38:33 1983
Received: Wed Jan 12 07:10:32 1983
Reply-To: warren@ihnss.UUCP (Warren Montgomery)
References: uw-beave.286

Being a recipient of all of the emacs mailing lists, I doubt that
the volume in net.emacs would swamp anybody.  It is interesting
information to see what is available in other implementations
anyway, even if your emacs isn't the one being disucssed.  I don't
really see it necessary to create lots of subgroups yet.  I could
make 2 suggestions to those submitting things.

1)	Identify which implementation you are talking about in each
	message.  (Gosling's, Zimmerman's, Montgomery's(BTL), ITS/TWENEX)

2)	When mailing lists are gatewayed, and this applies to other
	gatewayed mailing lists as well, strip the irrelevant junk
	out of the headers.  Gosling's mailing list comes with a
	full page of headers containing the entire list and all of
	the sites it visited along the way.


		Warren Montgomery
		ihnss!warren