From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!tom Newsgroups: net.audio Title: Re: Audio Magazines Article-I.D.: rlgvax.1150 Posted: Mon Mar 7 18:13:09 1983 Received: Tue Mar 8 03:54:05 1983 References: mhb5b.165 First, as requested here is my reply to the question "which stereo mags do we read?". I get High Fidelity, not because I necessarily think it better than the others but because I subscribed to it while also helping out a good charitable cause (the special olympics). Second, I am replying on the net ONLY because it was so requested. A general question of this type, particularly one which is addressed to the ENTIRE net.audio community for replies, should be answered by MAIL. The amount of replies could be huge, and I am a strong proponent for a streamlined Usenet. The proper way to handle a query which could generate such a large number of short replies is for the replies to be mailed, and the requestor doing a proper job of summarizing the results and presenting them to the net community. Marty, I'm afraid that I think you are being too lazy about your responsibilities as a topic coordinator (which comes from being a topic originator). That's my view, anyway. I AM interested in how others feel about this. So, everyone, feel free to MAIL (!) me your thoughts on this issue. I will post the results if enough interest is shown. I'm sure that, as usual, both viewpoints are correct to some extent. - ToM Beres RLG Corp. (...!duke!mcnc!rlgvax!tom) (...!brl-bmd!rlgvax!tom)