From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxj!mhuxi!aluxz!ltn Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Title: Re: 2M CQ - (nf) Article-I.D.: aluxz.1100 Posted: Sat Jan 22 10:44:50 1983 Received: Sun Jan 23 08:54:12 1983 References: pur-ee.792 Sure, let's call CQ on the repeaters. Besides, if you really want a QSO, calling CQ is probably the best way to get one. I'll bet that nine times out of ten, some guy who wouldn't bother coming back to a `monitoring' announcement WILL reply to your CQ, simply to flame on about not calling CQ on a repeater, and to `straighten out' the newcomer. de WA7WJZ, monitoring (Les Niles, Bell Labs Murray Hill (aluxz!ltn))