From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!tom
Newsgroups: net.audio
Title: Re: Audio Magazines
Article-I.D.: rlgvax.1150
Posted: Mon Mar  7 18:13:09 1983
Received: Tue Mar  8 03:54:05 1983
References: mhb5b.165

First, as requested here is my reply to the question "which stereo mags
do we read?".  I get High Fidelity, not because I necessarily think it better
than the others but because I subscribed to it while also helping out a
good charitable cause (the special olympics).

Second, I am replying on the net ONLY because it was so requested.  A general
question of this type, particularly one which is addressed to the ENTIRE
net.audio community for replies, should be answered by MAIL.  The amount
of replies could be huge, and I am a strong proponent for a streamlined
Usenet.  The proper way to handle a query which could generate such a large
number of short replies is for the replies to be mailed, and the requestor
doing a proper job of summarizing the results and presenting them to the
net community.  Marty, I'm afraid that I think you are being too lazy
about your responsibilities as a topic coordinator (which comes from being
a topic originator).

That's my view, anyway.  I AM interested in how others feel about this.
So, everyone, feel free to MAIL (!) me your thoughts on this issue.
I will post the results if enough interest is shown.  I'm sure that,
as usual, both viewpoints are correct to some extent.

- ToM Beres
  RLG Corp.
(...!duke!mcnc!rlgvax!tom)
(...!brl-bmd!rlgvax!tom)