From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!utah-gr!thomas@Utah-CS Newsgroups: net.emacs Title: Re: bug(s) Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.452 Posted: Tue Feb 15 01:59:00 1983 Received: Sun Feb 20 08:35:49 1983 From:No, I don't see that "the semantics of dynamic binding are being violated". This is exactly the behaviour I would expect from an un-compiled FEXPR. (I was wrong in classifying it as "call by name", the evaluation of this is generally done in the calling environment.) I do agree, however, that this should be more explicitly spelled out. It bit me the first time, too. Given that expressions must be either all FEXPRs or all EXPRs, I think I prefer the FEXPR interpretation. =Spencer