From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!CAD:tektronix!zehntel!sytek!menlo70!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!cca!ima!inmet!porges Newsgroups: net.lang.c Title: Re: PCC compiler question - (nf) Article-I.D.: inmet.44 Posted: Sun Mar 20 03:24:18 1983 Received: Fri Mar 25 06:26:23 1983 #R:bronze:-50100:inmet:5000002:000:490 inmet!porges Mar 18 17:48:00 1983 I don't know if you could really call a && b *= c (or whatever) a bug. The precedence levels are confusing, but all that's happened is that the compiler found a legal parse. If the legal parse implies that the default precedence is not applicable, too bad. The precedence levels server to disambiguate the parse, not restrict it. Or am I wrong again? -- Don Porges ...harpo!inmet!porges ...hplabs!sri-unix!cca!ima!inmet!porges ...yale-comix!ima!inmet!porges