From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!npoiv!npois!houxm!houxa!houxi!houxz!ihnp4!ihnss!warren Newsgroups: net.news Title: Re: Re net.emacs Article-I.D.: ihnss.1310 Posted: Tue Jan 11 12:38:33 1983 Received: Wed Jan 12 07:10:32 1983 Reply-To: warren@ihnss.UUCP (Warren Montgomery) References: uw-beave.286 Being a recipient of all of the emacs mailing lists, I doubt that the volume in net.emacs would swamp anybody. It is interesting information to see what is available in other implementations anyway, even if your emacs isn't the one being disucssed. I don't really see it necessary to create lots of subgroups yet. I could make 2 suggestions to those submitting things. 1) Identify which implementation you are talking about in each message. (Gosling's, Zimmerman's, Montgomery's(BTL), ITS/TWENEX) 2) When mailing lists are gatewayed, and this applies to other gatewayed mailing lists as well, strip the irrelevant junk out of the headers. Gosling's mailing list comes with a full page of headers containing the entire list and all of the sites it visited along the way. Warren Montgomery ihnss!warren