From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxp!reza
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Title: Summary of responses to the Cannon quality query
Article-I.D.: ihuxp.359
Posted: Fri Feb  4 14:39:47 1983
Received: Sat Feb  5 04:52:48 1983
Reply-To: reza@ihuxp.UUCP (H. Reza Taheri)



   Thanks to all the people who responded to my article.   There is
nothing to summarize since everyone who took the time to answer (on
the net or through mail) had the same thing to say:

	The dealer wanted me to buy a Nikon instead of the Cannon
	not because of the difference in quality but either because he
	got a bigger commission from Nikon or for some reason he wanted
	to keep his supply of Connons.

   Many people who have used a Cannon A-1 sent mail in defense of its
quality.  Everybody agrees that there is not much of a difference in
quality between the two brands, if any.  The bit about the commission 
makes sense.  Cannon probably spends its money on advertisement rather
than giving commission to dealers.


						  H. Reza Taheri
						  ...!ihnp4!ihuxp!reza
						  (312)-979-1040