From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxj!mhuxi!aluxz!ltn
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Title: Re: 2M CQ - (nf)
Article-I.D.: aluxz.1100
Posted: Sat Jan 22 10:44:50 1983
Received: Sun Jan 23 08:54:12 1983
References: pur-ee.792

Sure, let's call CQ on the repeaters.
Besides, if you really want a QSO, calling CQ is probably the best way to get
one.  I'll bet that nine times out of ten, some guy who wouldn't bother
coming back to a `monitoring' announcement WILL reply to your CQ, simply to
flame on about not calling CQ on a repeater, and to `straighten out' the
newcomer.

de WA7WJZ, monitoring

(Les Niles, Bell Labs Murray Hill (aluxz!ltn))