From: utzoo!decvax!duke!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!orion!lime!we13!plw
Newsgroups: net.misc
Title: Re: Religous Matters
Article-I.D.: we13.369
Posted: Thu Jan 20 09:30:42 1983
Received: Sun Jan 23 05:43:24 1983
References: ucbvax.629


	Read "Refutation of the Ontological Proof of the Existance of God"
by Kant (I think, it's been awhile since Intro to Philosophy). Proof by
definition is a tautology - a=b doesn't prove that either a or b exist, it
just establishes a relationship. Their are better proofs for the existance
of God than St. Anselm's, and I think that all have been refuted as having
some logical or philosophical flaw.