From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!houxz!houxi!houxa!houxm!u1100a!sdo
Newsgroups: net.general,net.news
Title: Replying on the net vs. replying by mail
Article-I.D.: u1100a.279
Posted: Tue Jan 18 13:46:55 1983
Received: Thu Jan 20 05:20:33 1983

Lately I've been seeing many "post-a-question everyone-posts-some-form-of-
the-answer" in various newsgroups.  In particular, I had to wade through
ten of the same reply to a question in net.rec.photo, which I had
already replied to by mail.  I know everyone needs to prove that they
are smart and know the answers, but if the proper procedures are followed,
you will get your recognition, and I will be spared reading the same thing
over and over.

Isn't it proper netiquette to mail answers to the originator who then
posts a collection of responses?  This person can include the names
of all those who responded so that they get their credit.

I'm only talking about the narrow case of a specific question being
asked, such as "What were the words to that theme song for that TV show
in 1962?" or "How do I kill a Troll with just an dart?"

Anything which doesn't have a clear answer or needs some discussion
or presents some safety issue should remain public.

Since this may need some discussion, please use net.followup for
non-trivial, non-defamatory, flameless replies.  The rest you can
mail to me.  (And, yes, I thought this was important enough for
net.general.)

			Scott Orshan
			Bell Labs Piscataway
			201-981-3064
			houxm!u1100a!sdo