From: utzoo!decvax!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsovax!warren Newsgroups: net.bugs Title: f77 bug - (nf) Article-I.D.: uicsovax.191 Posted: Sun Jun 20 19:06:50 1982 Received: Thu Jun 24 01:34:05 1982 Reply-To: s #N:uicsovax:10900001:000:381 uicsovax!warren Jun 18 21:51:00 1982 in f77 using a 0 as a continuation character in a common block is treated differently than other symbols, 0 gives a syntax error when placed in column 6, other symbols (i tried other digits) dont. the way berkeley f77 parses common blocks declarations is not standard in other respects, I have examples if anyone is interested. this is an obscure, but nevertheless present bug.