From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!floyd!cmcl2!philabs!jgc
Newsgroups: net.dcom
Title: Re: UDS 212-LP
Article-I.D.: philabs.2932
Posted: Thu Jun  3 08:56:26 1982
Received: Fri Jun  4 05:27:35 1982
References: ucbvax.7502

I have been using a 212-LP for about a week now.  It
replaced a 103 type that I was using.  The 212 protocall
seems to be much less susceptible to noisy lines than the old 
103A dataset that I had been using.  The calls that I make 
are from Manhattan (212) to Westchester county (914).  With
my old 103A I occasionally had to redial because of a noisy line,
but with the 212-LP I have not seen the problem at all.A

The 212-LP performs very well for the price.