From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihps3!ihuxx!robert1
Newsgroups: net.misc
Title: : The 1st Amendment and Communications Access, eh?
Article-I.D.: ihuxx.184
Posted: Mon Sep 27 17:08:28 1982
Received: Thu Sep 30 10:41:28 1982


	Re (an apparently hasty) reply (wheps.198) to my note:

----------
	I see no difference, in regard to censorship, between encoded and plain
	unencoded (if that is a word) cable. What have I missed.
		whuxg!beal
----------

	The difference is between encoded TV and cable transmissions (and a 
variety of other communications mediums, I'm sure). 
	The topic is restriction of access to those mediums, 
especially as enforced by the town of Bluffdale, Utah, with respect to
the potential introduction of cable in their fair town (ref Haas note
~ 10/23).
	I find no such word, "unencoded", in Webster's New Collegiate 
Dictionary.
	I have no idea what else you have missed.

		Now *I* should be ashamed to sign my name,

			Robert Duncan
			(ihuxx!robert1)