From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!info-terms Newsgroups: fa.info-terms Title: Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7108 Posted: Sat May 8 21:55:36 1982 Received: Sun May 9 02:19:15 1982 >From JMSK@MIT-MC Sat May 8 21:49:25 1982 RCPT:(root @ISL@Berkeley cbosgd!mark@BERKELEY) RCPT:(greep @ISL ucbvax!info-vax@BERKELEY (R-OPTION CC)) RCPT:(ucbvax!info-terms @BERKELEY (R-OPTION CC)) SUBJECT: vt-100's one reason we get vt-100's rather some of the other cheaper/"better" terminals is we need compatibility with DEC screen editors. the reason we don't get vt-100 clone's is to allow future installation of the Selanar full graphics boar, which , as far as i know, only works in an actual DEC VT-100.