From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!C70:info-cpm
Newsgroups: fa.info-cpm
Title: Is Apple CPM discussion appropriate on info-cpm??
Article-I.D.: ucb.1193
Posted: Wed May 26 23:24:33 1982
Received: Sat May 29 09:35:16 1982

>From daemon  Wed May 26 23:24:22 1982
GAI@MIT-AI 05/26/82 18:19:11 Re: Is Apple CPM discussion appropriate on info-cpm??
To: INFO-CPM at MIT-AI
CC: GAI at MIT-AI
  Sorry to take this to the entire list, but the only alternative is
to completely ignore it. I received the following unsigned message,
apparently in response to my message about patching apple-cpm input,
and have no way to reply to it:

    Annoyed@MIT-AI (Sent by ___041@MIT-AI) 05/23/82 11:31:36
    PLEASE DO NOT SEND APPLE RELATED ITEMS TO INFO-CPM.
    YOU ARE BORING MANY MANY PEOPLE, AND WASTING NETWORK RESOURCE.

  Does this message reflect the general sentiments of persons on this
list? I HAD considered using only INFO-APPLE even for my cpm-related
questions, and in fact I started out doing so!! The result was that
other people began forwarding my messages to INFO-CPM, so I inferred
(perhaps incorrectly) that I might as well send them there directly in
the first place.
   Are there any Apple CPM users out there who do not also
"subscribe" to INFO-APPLE ?? If not, should we begin using
INFO-APPLE as the forum for discussing Apple CPM related issues?
   Are there non-Apple CPM users who would nevertheless still
like to hear about Apple CPM?
   Comments, suggestions??
		--Glenn