From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!info-terms
Newsgroups: fa.info-terms
Title: 
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7109
Posted: Sat May  8 22:02:11 1982
Received: Sun May  9 02:20:59 1982

>From JMSK@MIT-MC Sat May  8 21:55:39 1982
RCPT:(root @ISL@Berkeley cbosgd!mark@BERKELEY)
RCPT:(greep @ISL ucbvax!info-vax@BERKELEY (R-OPTION CC))
RCPT:(ucbvax!info-terms @BERKELEY (R-OPTION CC))
SUBJECT: vt-100's

one reason we get vt-100's rather some of the other cheaper/"better"
terminals is we need compatibility with DEC screen editors.

the reason we don't get vt-100 clone's is to allow future installation of the
Selanar full graphics boar, which , as far as i know, only works in an actual
DEC VT-100.