Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » General Discussion » News and Politics » Corporate welfare's quiet enablers: How democrats pander to big business
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Corporate welfare's quiet enablers: How democrats pander to big business [message #260430] Fri, 11 July 2014 10:47
CyberkNight is currently offline  CyberkNight
Messages: 1606
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
In politics, as the old saying goes, there are no permanent friends or permanent enemies there are only permanent interests. Few policy debates prove that truism as well as the one now brewing over the Export-Import Bank a government agency providing taxpayer subsidized loans to multinational corporations.

This tale starts 15 years ago when my old boss, U.S. Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, was trying to construct a left-right coalition to reform the bank. While a few libertarians were willing to voice free-market criticism of the bank, the impetus for reform was primarily among Democrats and the left. Indeed, Sanders' failed 2002 amendment proposing to restrict the bank's subsidies garnered only 22 Republican votes but had 111 Democratic backers mostly progressive legislators who, in the words of Sanders, saw the Ex-Im Bank program as "one of the most egregious forms of corporate welfare."

As Salon's David Dayen reports, liberals in subsequent years "highlighted how Enron, the failed energy giant, benefited from $675 million in Ex-Im loans"; how "Ex-Im gave an $18 million loan to a Chinese steel mill, which was later on accused of dumping steel into U.S. markets and hurting U.S. workers" and how, "Ex-Im loan guarantees helped build one of the largest coal plants in the world." By 2008, the progressive-themed criticism of the bank had become so central to Democrats' agenda that Barack Obama used a presidential campaign speech in 2008 to lambast the bank as "little more than a fund for corporate welfare."

Fast forward to the last few years. In 2012, Democrats rammed a bill reauthorizing the bank through the Senate, and Obama held a public ceremony to sign the reauthorization bill into law. At the same time, Republicans provided most of the congressional votes against the bank. And now, in the last few weeks, the GOP's new House majority leader is threatening to block the next authorization bill and thus completely shut the bank down.

Full article: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/10/corporate_welfares_quiet_ena blers_how_democrats_pander_to_big_business_partner/


  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: In NSA-intercepted data, those not targeted far outnumber the foreigners who are
Next Topic: Lois Lerner's Former FEC Colleague Has Emails Go Missing Too
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Mar 29 09:55:54 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.49680 seconds