Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » General Discussion » News and Politics » Supreme Court Strikes Down Obama's Unconstitutional Executive Overreach 90
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Supreme Court Strikes Down Obama's Unconstitutional Executive Overreach 90 [message #258100] Fri, 27 June 2014 10:23
CyberkNight is currently offline  CyberkNight
Messages: 1606
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
The U.S. Constitution requires the president to receive the "advice and consent" of the Senate when filling vacancies in high government offices. Yet in January 2012 President Barack Obama bypassed that requirement and placed three new members on the National Labor Relations Board without first receiving senatorial confirmation. To justify this unilateral exercise of executive power, Obama cited the Constitution's Recess Appointments Clause, which permits the president to make temporary appointments to "fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session." But there was a problem: The Senate was not in recess at that time. In fact, Senate Republicans were then holding pro forma sessions for the precise purpose of denying Obama a legitimate opportunity to make any and all recess appointments. Obama's actions therefore violated both the text of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of the federal government.

Today, by a vote of 9-0, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Obama's unconstitutional overreach in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning. "In our view," declared the majority opinion of Justice Stephen Breyer, "the pro forma sessions count as sessions, not as periods of recess." Therefore, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is."

This ruling represents a resounding and well-deserved defeat for the Obama administration, which failed to garner even a single vote for its expansive theory of executive power. Indeed, in terms of recess appointments, President Obama has revealed a tendency towards unilateral action that exceeds even that of his predecessor George W. Bush, who was no slouch in the executive power department.

Full article: http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/26/supreme-court-strikes-down -obamas-uncons


[Updated on: Fri, 27 June 2014 10:25]

Report message to a moderator

  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Your Doctor Knows You're Killing Yourself. The Data Brokers Told Her
Next Topic: A SWAT team blew a hole in my 2-year-old son
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 22:23:30 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24808 seconds