Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.space » Space Whoopee
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Space Whoopee [message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:LShilkoff.ES@Xerox.ARPA
Article-I.D.: <2457@mordor.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 29-Jun-85 22:35:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: mordor.2457
Posted: Sat Jun 29 22:35:01 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 07:59:06 EDT
Sender: daemon@mordor.UUCP
Lines: 19

From: LShilkoff.ES@Xerox.ARPA

I just heard on the radio NASA is planning for experiments involving
intimate relations on board the future space station with married
couples and couples with "significant relationships". 

Question: How do you avoid moving from a stationary point in space while
having intimate relations.

I understand the first space based birth control device will be called
the heat shield :-)


sorryijusthadto


Larry

 
RE: Space Whoopee [message #135635 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
schultz is currently offline  schultz
Messages: 6
Registered: June 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Article-I.D.: <646@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Jul-85 11:27:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: bgsuvax.646
Posted: Wed Jul 10 11:27:32 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jul-85 03:11:32 EDT
Organization: Bowling Green State University, OH
Lines: 27
Xref: watmath net.space:4246 net.jokes:13143



> . . . NASA is planning for experiments involving
> intimate relations on board the future space station with married
> couples and couples with "significant relationships". 
> 
> Question: How do you avoid moving from a stationary point in space while
> having intimate relations.
> 
> I understand the first space based birth control device will be called
> the heat shield :-)
> 
> Larry

  Uh, just a few questions, Larry.  What is a "significant relationship"?
Does lust count for anything?  And I heard that these "heat sheilds" are
having problems.  They are falling off and cracking during 'liftoff' and
especially during 'reentry'.  Any truth to these rumours? :-)

                               Steven Schultz
===============================================================================
            "You can get anything you want, at Alice's Restaurant,
                               excepting Alice"
               -Arlo Guthrie "Alice's Restaurant Massacree"
===============================================================================
            PATH:  uw-beaver!ihnp4!cbosgd!osu-eddie!bgsuvax!schultz
===============================================================================
Re: Space Whoopee [message #135645 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: steve@kontron.UUCP (Steve McIntosh)
Article-I.D.: <338@kontron.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Jul-85 14:07:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: kontron.338
Posted: Mon Jul  8 14:07:01 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jul-85 11:18:21 EDT
References: <2457@mordor.UUCP>
Organization: Kontron Electronics, Irvine, CA
Lines: 7

> From: LShilkoff.ES@Xerox.ARPA
> 
> Question: How do you avoid moving from a stationary point in space while
> having intimate relations.
> 
Answer: Bunjee cords
[Perhaps the Russians have already tried it]
RE: Space Whoopee [message #135658 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dturner is currently offline  dturner
Messages: 4
Registered: July 1985
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Article-I.D.: <1693@saber.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 00:57:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: saber.1693
Posted: Fri Jul 12 00:57:43 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Jul-85 07:03:58 EDT
References: <646@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Organization: Saber Technology, San Jose, CA
Lines: 46
Xref: watmath net.space:4266 net.jokes:13203

> 
> 
> > . . . NASA is planning for experiments involving
> > intimate relations on board the future space station with married
> > couples and couples with "significant relationships". 
> > 
> > Question: How do you avoid moving from a stationary point in space while
> > having intimate relations.
> > 
> > I understand the first space based birth control device will be called
> > the heat shield :-)
> > 
> > Larry
> 
>   Uh, just a few questions, Larry.  What is a "significant relationship"?
> Does lust count for anything?  And I heard that these "heat sheilds" are
> having problems.  They are falling off and cracking during 'liftoff' and
> especially during 'reentry'.  Any truth to these rumours? :-)
> 
>                                Steven Schultz
> ===============================================================================
>             "You can get anything you want, at Alice's Restaurant,
>                                excepting Alice"
>                -Arlo Guthrie "Alice's Restaurant Massacree"
> ===============================================================================
>             PATH:  uw-beaver!ihnp4!cbosgd!osu-eddie!bgsuvax!schultz
> ===============================================================================

you know what roert heinlin says

"in a space suit built for 2 "

-- 
	        	
     *****************************************************
     *  oh dreddle gruntbuggly thy mictuations are to me *
     *  as plurdled garblebotchits on a lurgid be        *
     *****************************************************



Name:	David Turner
Mail:	6259 Rainbow dr , San Jose, California 95129
AT&T:	(408) 725-1974
UUCP:	...{decvax,ucbvax}!decwrl!saber!dturner
	...{amd,ihnp4,ittvax}!saber!dturner
RE: Space Whoopee [message #135666 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:mcgeer%ucbkim@Berkeley
Article-I.D.: <2641@mordor.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Jul-85 20:55:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: mordor.2641
Posted: Fri Jul 12 20:55:19 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 16-Jul-85 21:16:50 EDT
Sender: daemon@mordor.UUCP
Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL
Lines: 17

From: Rick McGeer (on an aaa-60-s) 

	Quite aside from the sniggering in this matter, there's a serious
question here.  Can humans conceive and reproduce in free fall? Maybe it
will never matter (the O'Neill colony will have artificial gravity) but we
still should find out.

	The effects of free fall on a fetus can't be measured until the
space station goes up, and for that matter the effects on a human fetus
shouldn't be explored at all until there has been at least one animal
(preferably primate) pregnancy and birth in space.  However, we can test the
ability to conceive right now: send a pair of rabbits up, with the female
due to go in heat while in orbit.  This test wouldn't prove the negative
result conclusively if the rabbits refused to Do It, but that (knowing
rabbits) is fairly unlikely....

					Rick.
Re: Space Whoopee [message #135671 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous message
fred is currently offline  fred
Messages: 64
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
Article-I.D.: <1337@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Jul-85 09:05:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1337
Posted: Wed Jul 17 09:05:47 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 17-Jul-85 10:24:54 EDT
References: <2641@mordor.UUCP>
Reply-To: fred@mnetor.UUCP (Fred Williams)
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 13
Summary: 

In article <2641@mordor.UUCP> @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:mcgeer%ucbkim@Berkeley writes:
>
>	Quite aside from the sniggering in this matter, there's a serious
>question here.  Can humans conceive and reproduce in free fall? Maybe it
>will never matter (the O'Neill colony will have artificial gravity) but we
>still should find out.
>
	Come now! Do you really have any doubts???
	Of coarse not! We know what's going on in your mind.
	You want confirmation of Newton's third law!!!

Cheers,		Fred Williams
Re: Space Whoopee ... [message #135675 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 18 October 2013 16:21 Go to previous message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:LARS@ACC
Article-I.D.: <2676@mordor.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 01:10:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: mordor.2676
Posted: Tue Jul 16 01:10:18 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Jul-85 05:30:14 EDT
Sender: daemon@mordor.UUCP
Lines: 17

From: Lars Poulsen 


From "The Weekly" of Santa Barbara, July 11th, comes this little
filler piece titled ''SEX IN SPACE'':
''Seeking to ensure the success of space missions, NASA has to be
sensitive to the needs of its crew members. With the first US space
station scheduled to go up in 1992, and "manned" by members of
both sexes, provisions for some extra-terestrial nookie are cur-
rently being explored. According to Yvonne Clearwater, an envir-
onmental psychologist for the space agency, normal, healthy
professionals will probably possess normal, healthy sexual appe-
tites. It isn't NASA's job to make moral judgments, just to make
sure the station's scientific work isn't disrupted. And that, says
Clearwater, means providing an "environment where needs for
auditory and visual privacy are met."''
------
RE: Space Whoopee [message #139093 is a reply to message #135602] Fri, 19 July 1985 18:34 Go to previous message
paulh is currently offline  paulh
Messages: 4
Registered: June 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Article-I.D.: tektroni.5518
Posted: Fri Jul 19 18:34:49 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jul-85 04:12:13 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 15
Xref: linus net.jokes:11179 net.space:2785


>> ... NASA is planning for experiments involving intimate relations on board
>> the future space station with married couples ...
>> 
>> Question: How do you avoid moving from a stationary point in space while
>> having intimate relations.

From Eros Rising (Volume I of Tales of The Velvet Comet) by Mike Resnick:

"Never try to make love in free fall; you can strain everything you've got!"
-- 

Paul Hoefling
Information Pack Rat
uucp: {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,ucbvax,zehntel}!tektronix!paulh
Re: Space Whoopee [message #139097 is a reply to message #135602] Sun, 21 July 1985 15:13 Go to previous message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: gamma@ih1ap.UUCP (tontille)
Article-I.D.: ih1ap.510
Posted: Sun Jul 21 15:13:43 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Jul-85 20:15:21 EDT
References: <2641@mordor.UUCP> <1337@mnetor.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 8

[]

	I dont see any problems with positioning
(a modified 'Rocking Chair' position seems reasonable),
and this could lead to a small retail business providing
'Space Bondage' devices to prevent sudden undocking.

		Key-Man (and the Masters of Technology)
Re: Space Whoopee [message #139107 is a reply to message #135602] Mon, 22 July 1985 16:01 Go to previous message
greenber is currently offline  greenber
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Article-I.D.: timeinc.348
Posted: Mon Jul 22 16:01:20 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 02:38:41 EDT
References: <2641@mordor.UUCP> <1337@mnetor.UUCP>
Reply-To: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Organization: Time, Inc. - New York
Lines: 13
Summary: 

Doesn't the idea of intimate relations somehow tie in with the idea
of how you move in space with no, er, reaction pistol???

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross M. Greenberg  @ Time Inc, New York 
              --------->{vax135 | ihnp4}!timeinc!greenber<---------

I highly doubt that Time Inc.  would make me their spokesperson.
----
"I was riding a wombat this morning, 'till it broke its leg. I had to
 shoot it"  -- Ranger on Camel
Re: Space Whoopee [message #139108 is a reply to message #135602] Mon, 22 July 1985 13:52 Go to previous message
mff is currently offline  mff
Messages: 20
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Article-I.D.: wuphys.329
Posted: Mon Jul 22 13:52:29 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 03:31:28 EDT
References: <2641@mordor.UUCP> <1337@mnetor.UUCP>
Reply-To: mff@wuphys.UUCP (Swamp Thing)
Organization: Physics Dept., Washington Univ. in St. Louis
Lines: 26

In article <1337@mnetor.UUCP> fred@mnetor.UUCP (Fred Williams) writes:
>In article <2641@mordor.UUCP> @S1-A.ARPA,@MIT-MC.ARPA:mcgeer%ucbkim@Berkeley writes:
>>
>>	Quite aside from the sniggering in this matter, there's a serious
>>question here.  Can humans conceive and reproduce in free fall?
>>
>	Come now! Do you really have any doubts???
>	Of coarse not! We know what's going on in your mind.
>	You want confirmation of Newton's third law!!!
>
>Cheers,		Fred Williams

I know it sounds silly, but, all seriousness aside, did you ever hear of
rubber-bands?  A couple of these, strategically located, could do wonders.


						Mark F. Flynn
						Department of Physics
						Washington University
						St. Louis, MO  63130
						ihnp4!wuphys!mff

"There is no dark side of the moon, really.
 Matter of fact, it's all dark."

				P. Floyd
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Spaceweek 1985
Next Topic: Re: SPACE Digest V5 #215
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Apr 24 21:27:01 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05467 seconds