| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122128] |
Tue, 01 October 2013 20:52  |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 01:47:16 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> wrote:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
> news:l1if391l94j90r65bmmu7as8br9sj1sb07@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:32:43 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Will Dockery <will.dockery@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:de861268-567e-4d09-be10-4d38b5df034c@googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:57:10 PM UTC-4,
>>>> wheresou...@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:36:09 -0700 (PDT), Will Dockery wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >An interesting read on the new Star Trek stuff I ran across:
>>>> >
>>>> > >
> http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2008/06/clip_job_ an_exc_
>>> 3.
>>>> > >php
>>>> >
>>>> > >"...Self-righteous person after self-righteous person has told me
>>>> > >how th
>>>> eyre
>>>> > >going to stay at home and watch The Wrath of Khan on repeat in
> pro
>>>> test of
>>>> > >Abrams bastardization of a beloved story. They should do what
> they
>>>> > >fe
>>>> el is
>>>> > >best. Me? Im going to go see the movie again."
>>>> >
>>>> > Yet another unsolicited testimonial?
>>>> >
>>>> > LOL.
>>>> >
>>>> > More likely:
>>>> >
>>>> > "Vee joos chaven't been ghetting ennuff sheckels outt of our
> chlatest
>>>> > Chollyvood boondoggle!
>>>> >
>>>> > Qvvick! Chymeee! Do sum prumoshen alreaddy!!"
>>>> >
>>>> > Why are Jews such
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> Who invited the Nazi over to the party?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Crashville Skyline from Will Dockery & The Shadowville All-Stars:
>>>> http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery/song/18523932-crashv ille-
>>> skylin
>>>> e--shadowville
>>>>
>>>
>>> He invites himself. He thinks people care what he believes.
>>
>>
>> And yet you still shrink from answering my perfectly valid question.
>>
>> Not so "wise" after all, are you?
>>
>>
>> http://www.texemarrs.com/062004/soviet_gulag.htm
>>
>>
>
> It's a stupid question from an idiot. Why should I answer it...or you,
> the idiot.
>
>
> This is a Star Trek group, not any religious nonsense group.
>
> But YOU'RE too stupid to understand that.
>
> Now go away.
>
> <plonk>
LOL. The "wise" one speaks.
But you see, "wise" one, my question really had nothing to do with
"religion" at all. Not that it really matters, but...
Just to remind you... because you apparently forgot...
Wayyyy back in June you said:
>> ... for someone so racist, why do you even watch Star Trek in the
>> first place? Special effects? You obviously don't understand it. Or
>> anything else.
>>
>>
And then I said:
>
> Oh...
>
> So I take it you don't like racists, and think it is morally right or
> proper to reprimand or ridicule, or vilify them.
>
> I also suspect that you believe racial supremacism is bad as well.
>
> Is this correct?
And you never answered.
The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
answer. And that is why you're mad.
But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
So actually, my job is done here... in that respect.
Have a nice day. :)
-.-
"You seem to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots,
and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest
people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations
in impertinent fables in bad conduct and barbarism. You deserve to be
punished, for this is your destiny."
Voltaire
From a letter to a jew who had written to him, complaining of his
"anti-semitism". LOL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUGVPBO9_cA
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122322 is a reply to message #122128] |
Wed, 02 October 2013 10:48  |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
<Snip>
> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>
> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>
> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>
> So actually, my job is done here...
Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
discuss Trek stuff here??
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122323 is a reply to message #122322] |
Wed, 02 October 2013 12:28 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>
>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>
>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>
>> So actually, my job is done here...
>
> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
> discuss Trek stuff here??
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
No, he's too stupid for that.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122804 is a reply to message #122323] |
Thu, 03 October 2013 11:32 |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Wiseguy wrote:
> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>
>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>
>>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>
>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
>>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>>
>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>
>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>
>> Daniel
>
> No, he's too stupid for that.
One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122918 is a reply to message #122804] |
Thu, 03 October 2013 20:06 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
<dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
> Wiseguy wrote:
>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>
>>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>>>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>>
>>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
>>>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>>>
>>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>
>>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
>>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>
> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>
> Daniel
Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
-.-
Two more infants have been infected with a deadly herpes virus in the
last three months after undergoing a controversial religious oral
circumcision in New York City.
The latest cases bring the count to 13 infants since 2000, two of
which suffered brain damage and two died from the virus which can
rapidly spread throughout its body.
The ultra-Orthodox Jewish practice of metzitzah b'peh requires a
practitioner to orally suck the baby's penis to "cleanse" the open
wound following its circumcision, making them susceptible to the
virus.
The department of health says one of the latest infants to contract
the virus developed a fever and a lesion on its scrotum, seven days
after the procedure. The boy later tested positive for HSV-1. That
virus differs from HSV-2, the genital herpes, which is contracted
during sexual intercourse.
"A herpes infection in a newborn baby has the risk of leading to
severe illness and death," Jay Varma, deputy commissioner for disease
control at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
told ABC News.
"The reason is that the baby doesn't have the same fully developed
immune system as an adult. Instead of staying in the genital area, it
extends throughout different organs in the body," he explained.
He said it's too soon to tell whether the boys will suffer permanent
effects.
The identify of the rabbi who performed the circumcision is being
withheld by the boys' parents, preventing the health department to
step in, they said.
Dangers: Since 2000 13 known cases of herpes have resulted from the
practice, two of which suffered brain damage and two others
diedDangers: Since 2000 13 known cases of herpes have resulted from
the practice, two of which suffered brain damage and two others died
The religious practice that dates back to more than 5,000 years defies
warning by the city's department of health which says there is no safe
way to perform the oral suction on an open wound.
....
bit.ly/11YIXR6
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #122972 is a reply to message #122918] |
Fri, 04 October 2013 00:13 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
news:sg1s49570p7joio90srv8d9fgq6vqocje9@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>
>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>
>>>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>> > The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
only
>>>> > serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >
>>>> > And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> > answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >
>>>> > But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
understand
>>>> > that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as
well.
>>>> >
>>>> > So actually, my job is done here...
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers
to
>>>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>
>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>
>> Daniel
>
>
> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>
No one cares what you think and post.
You're the only one too stupid to figure that out.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123099 is a reply to message #122918] |
Fri, 04 October 2013 08:20 |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>
>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>
>>>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>> > The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>>>> > serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >
>>>> > And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> > answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >
>>>> > But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
>>>> > that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > So actually, my job is done here...
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
>>>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>
>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>
>> Daniel
>
>
> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123778 is a reply to message #122972] |
Sat, 05 October 2013 00:05 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:13:14 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> wrote:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
> news:sg1s49570p7joio90srv8d9fgq6vqocje9@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>>
>>>> > wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > <Snip>
>>>> >> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
> only
>>>> >> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
> understand
>>>> >> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as
> well.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >
>>>> > Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers
> to
>>>> > discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >
>>>> > Daniel
>>>>
>>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>
>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>
>
>
> No one cares what you think and post.
>
> You're the only one too stupid to figure that out.
LOL.
The plonker replies again!
LOL.
Hey, plonker...
Maybe you think it's normal that jews suck on sliced baby dicks.
Well I don't. I think it's sick, perverted, and foul.
But it's soooo just like a jew... or maybe even... "yew".
LOL.
-.-
"The Jews have no sense of proportion nor do they have any judgement
on world affairs...The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care
not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks
get murdered or mistreated as Displaced Persons as long as the Jews
get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial
or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for
cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog."
Harry S. Truman 1947 Diary
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/diary/page21.htm
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123779 is a reply to message #123099] |
Sat, 05 October 2013 00:07 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:20:51 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
<dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>>
>>>> > wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > <Snip>
>>>> >> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>>>> >> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to understand
>>>> >> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >
>>>> > Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
>>>> > discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >
>>>> > Daniel
>>>>
>>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>
>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>
> What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
>
> Daniel
>
What... did you skip out on your hebrew classes?
Bad jew! Bad jew!
Go swing a chicken over your head to atone for your sins!
-.-
Orthodox Jew charged with sexual abuse of kids seeks asylum in Israel
under Law of Return -
British haredi man charged with child sexual abuse attempts to get
into Israel using phony passport, seeks citizenship under law allowing
all Jews to immigrate to Jewish state
ed note\u2013generally speaking, Israel does not extradite Jews for
having violated Gentile laws, which the Jews consider to be inferior
and therefore void. As it pertains to this case, if the children who
were molested turn out to be gentiles, then Jewish law is clear on the
matter that no crime took place, as the Talmud\u2013backed up by
certain precedents and teachings in the Torah\u2013permit a Jew to
sexually exploit gentile children. IF this Jew is denied Israeli
citizenship it will be due entirely to the bad PR that would result
from such a case.
ynet
Does the Law of Return trump international law? This question will
have to be ruled on by the High Court of Justice, following an attempt
by an ultra-Orthodox Jew from England, who was charged with sexual
abuse of children, to find asylum in Israel.
The man has been detained already for over a half year. In a rare
instance, the Interior Ministry decided not to grant him standing
under the Law of Return, due to the heavy suspicions against him in
the UK.
Now the issue comes before the High Court, which is expected to rule
soon, in an unusual case \u2013 is it possible to grant standing under
the Law of Return to a Jew accused of pedophilia who has fled his home
country in order to escape prosecution?
An indictment was filed against T., 48, for indecent assault on a
minor. After charges were announced, T. fled to Israel together with
his family. But when he landed, he was arrested for using a fake
passport.
The Immigration Authority refused to grant him standing under the Law
of Return due to the charges against him in the UK, and even sought to
deport him back to his homeland.
....
http://bit.ly/GDMqw9
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123807 is a reply to message #123099] |
Sat, 05 October 2013 02:21 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
news:Xoy3u.24200$Bi.1620@fx17.iad:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>>
>>>> > wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > <Snip>
>>>> >> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>>>> >> only serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>>>> >> understand that your stubborn refusal to answer my question
>>>> >> exposes you as well.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >
>>>> > Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers
>>>> > to discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >
>>>> > Daniel
>>>>
>>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>
>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>
> What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
No, he can't, he's too stupid.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123808 is a reply to message #123779] |
Sat, 05 October 2013 02:23 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
news:es3v49pcdidnp3ufepihffk18dg1oa700j@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:20:51 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>
>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> > "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> > news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>> >
>>>> >> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> <Snip>
>>>> >>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>>>> >>> only serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>>>> >>> understand that your stubborn refusal to answer my question
>>>> >>> exposes you as well.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us
>>>> >> trekkers to discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Daniel
>>>> >
>>>> > No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>>
>>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>
>> What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>
> What... did you skip out on your hebrew classes?
>
> Bad jew! Bad jew!
>
> Go swing a chicken over your head to atone for your sins!
>
Your stupidity is overwhelming.
And why are you so proud of your stupidity that you feel you have to
keep displaying it here. Boggles the mind.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #123809 is a reply to message #123778] |
Sat, 05 October 2013 02:26 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
news:vs3v49tq7kq42mr4u9kkametj3o195u2sl@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:13:14 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
>> news:sg1s49570p7joio90srv8d9fgq6vqocje9@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> > "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> > news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>> >
>>>> >> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> <Snip>
>>>> >>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>> only
>>>> >>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>> understand
>>>> >>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as
>> well.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us
trekkers
>> to
>>>> >> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Daniel
>>>> >
>>>> > No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>>
>>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>>
>>
>>
>> No one cares what you think and post.
>>
>> You're the only one too stupid to figure that out.
>
>
> LOL.
>
> The plonker replies again!
>
Already explained that, stupid.
Pay attention. Stop looking at shiny objects and read and
comprehend...assuning you can. Based on your stupid religious rants you
are obviously a moron.
> LOL.
>
> Hey, plonker...
>
> Maybe you think it's normal that jews suck on sliced baby dicks.
>
No I don't think that, I have a brain unlike you.
> Well I don't. I think it's sick, perverted, and foul.
>
> But it's soooo just like a jew... or maybe even... "yew".
>
> LOL.
>
What are you laughing at, yourself? So are all of us.
Laugh at the stupid idiot.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #125255 is a reply to message #123807] |
Sun, 06 October 2013 16:56 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:21:15 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> a.k.a.,
"The Paper Tiger Plonker" plonked:
> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
> news:Xoy3u.24200$Bi.1620@fx17.iad:
>
>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> > "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> > news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>> >
>>>> >> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> <Snip>
>>>> >>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>>>> >>> only serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>>>> >>> understand that your stubborn refusal to answer my question
>>>> >>> exposes you as well.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers
>>>> >> to discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Daniel
>>>> >
>>>> > No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>>
>>>> One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>
>> What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>
> No, he can't, he's too stupid.
LOL.
The paper tiger plonker strikes again!
LOL.
-.-
"Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to
remain here without my written permission. I know of no other
troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished
the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending, and commits all
deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be
removed and excluded from here as much as possible."
Maria Theresa
Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 - 1789)
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #125256 is a reply to message #123808] |
Sun, 06 October 2013 16:56 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:23:13 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> a.k.a.,
"The Paper Tiger Plonker" plonked:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
> news:es3v49pcdidnp3ufepihffk18dg1oa700j@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:20:51 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> >> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> >> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> <Snip>
>>>> >>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>>>> >>>> only serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>>>> >>>> understand that your stubborn refusal to answer my question
>>>> >>>> exposes you as well.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us
>>>> >>> trekkers to discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Daniel
>>>> >>
>>>> >> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>> >
>>>> > One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>> >
>>>> > Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>>
>>> What the ...?? Can you put that in English, please??
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>
>> What... did you skip out on your hebrew classes?
>>
>> Bad jew! Bad jew!
>>
>> Go swing a chicken over your head to atone for your sins!
>>
>
> Your stupidity is overwhelming.
>
> And why are you so proud of your stupidity that you feel you have to
> keep displaying it here. Boggles the mind.
LOL
Hey plonker...
Plonk me again. It tickles.
LOL.
-.-
"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's
armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and
the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that
each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and
the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."
George Washington
Maxims of George Washington
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Trek Into Darkness [message #125257 is a reply to message #123809] |
Sun, 06 October 2013 16:56 |
wheresourblessing
Messages: 55
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:26:04 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> a.k.a.,
"The Paper Tiger Plonker" plonked:
> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
> news:vs3v49tq7kq42mr4u9kkametj3o195u2sl@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:13:14 GMT, Wiseguy <epwise@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote in
>>> news:sg1s49570p7joio90srv8d9fgq6vqocje9@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000, "Daniel47@teranews.com"
>>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> >> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> >> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367@fx18.iad:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> wheresourblessing@israels.wars wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> <Snip>
>>>> >>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will
>>> only
>>>> >>>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>>> >>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise" enough to
>>> understand
>>>> >>>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as
>>> well.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us
> trekkers
>>> to
>>>> >>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Daniel
>>>> >>
>>>> >> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>> >
>>>> >One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>> >
>>>> >Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No one cares what you think and post.
>>>
>>> You're the only one too stupid to figure that out.
>>
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> The plonker replies again!
>>
>
> Already explained that, stupid.
>
> Pay attention. Stop looking at shiny objects and read and
> comprehend...assuning you can. Based on your stupid religious rants you
> are obviously a moron.
>
>> LOL.
>>
>> Hey, plonker...
>>
>> Maybe you think it's normal that jews suck on sliced baby dicks.
>>
>
> No I don't think that, I have a brain unlike you.
>
>> Well I don't. I think it's sick, perverted, and foul.
>>
>> But it's soooo just like a jew... or maybe even... "yew".
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>
>
> What are you laughing at, yourself? So are all of us.
>
What... you got a mouse in your pocket?
LOL.
> Laugh at the stupid idiot.
Oh, I am.
LOL
Believe me, I am.
LOL.
Plonk me again, please.
LOL.
-.-
"The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race
ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities
that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease,
confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without
taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is
wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of
display.
....
The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really
privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent
bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places
of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment
any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place
diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still
nicht gewuenscht ("not wanted.").
....
I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I
suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work,
worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must
differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright
spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish.
....
The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews
is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew
is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first
prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has
ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever
challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish
scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter
bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are
only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact
than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud
was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that
even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may
be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But
whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it
must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in
fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he
will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success.
But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability."
H. L. Mencken
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
