Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.sf-lovers » Re: SF-LOVERS Digest V10 #37
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: SF-LOVERS Digest V10 #37 [message #114433] Tue, 17 September 2013 15:21
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: @RUTGERS.ARPA,@MIT-MC:MLY.G.SHADES@MIT-OZ
Message-ID: <503@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 4-Feb-85 00:56:58 EST
Article-I.D.: topaz.503
Posted: Mon Feb  4 00:56:58 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Feb-85 04:10:23 EST
Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 25

From: geoffrey dov cooper 

	i was only being semi-facetious about the star wars movies.
yes they did gross an amazing amount of money, but, they are not and
never have been good science fiction.

	they lack adequate characterization, an adult plot, realism in
their special effects, etc.

	as someone previously pointed out they are simply a remake of
all the old westerns that we watched as kids, with the addition of old
air battle footage ala n wwii movies.

	i forget the originator of the quote but "you can't go broke
underestimating the taste of the american public."

	star wars is and was a prime example of shooting for the
lowest common denominator.  money made is not an adequate indicator of
quality it just goes to show that action/adventure never goes out of
style.  if money made was the way to choose quality then harold
robbins and sidney sheldon are the greatest writers since the edge of
creation (excepting moses of course).

                            shades@mit-oz
-------
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Delany's STARS IN MY POCKET LIKE GRAINS OF SAND
Next Topic: Re: SF-LOVERS Digest V10 #38
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 18 13:30:47 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00299 seconds